From df2d04b1ac5782b9e369b5641f9ab93d2e7b45aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Krystian Hebel Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2024 13:25:26 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] 2024-12-13-ram-data-decay-research.md: change improper word Signed-off-by: Krystian Hebel --- blog/content/post/2024-12-13-ram-data-decay-research.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/blog/content/post/2024-12-13-ram-data-decay-research.md b/blog/content/post/2024-12-13-ram-data-decay-research.md index 81fb723e..bf098d21 100644 --- a/blog/content/post/2024-12-13-ram-data-decay-research.md +++ b/blog/content/post/2024-12-13-ram-data-decay-research.md @@ -247,8 +247,8 @@ on the memory bus. On this platform, we've struggled to get any preserved bits at all. We ended up disconnecting the battery and unplugging and, as quickly as humanly possible, -plugging power cord back. The time without power was so short that it was unable -to measure using stopwatch. +plugging power cord back. The time without power was so short that it was +impossible to measure using stopwatch. Our best 3 measurements were 36.06%, 39.28% and 41.04%, and the rest was so close to the worst possible result (50%) that it may as well be disregarded as a