-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 574
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
How to setup the development environment which is identical to the one core developers are using? #2229
Comments
The easiest option is to use codespaces directly in GitHub. It won't work for GUIs (Qt, kivy) but for everything else it should be ok. If you want to run it locally, you can look at the Tests can be run with the tox test plugin (which is automatically installed if you use the devcontainer), but due to some strange vscode-server restrictions you first have to open the |
It is a major risk if you cannot develop a software without tools from Microsoft. And, cloud computing is hard for me since I am totally behind away from clearnet using Tor. |
Of course you can develop PyBitmessage without tools from Microsoft (except for building windows binaries which do require some Microsoft libraries, even though they are built with wine). I for example develop with vim, but I don't run the tests or builds locally anymore, I let buildbot do it. I use codespaces for pair programming. If you want to run the PyQt4 version locally while developing, you can base your environment on Ubuntu 18.04, either as a VM or as a container. I for example use it in docker with xpra frontend. |
One of the problems with the Qt frontend is that we don't have automated tests for it, so you have to test it locally, for now. There were some attempts but I don't think they were finished. |
I don't know GUI world well, but if you know some GUI toolkits that have automatic test facilities, please let me know.
|
For kivy, we use telenium. This is what it then looks like: https://artifacts.bitmessage.at/kivy/25018/test.webm For Qt, this is the PR I was referring to: #1603 |
I don't like Ubuntu. I have no high-end machine, so VM can not run smoothly. I don't like docker.
BTW, now I'm trying to build good old Qt4 from source code on my new stable Debian derived Linux. |
Interesting!
|
Well, you don't have to use it, it's just going to get more difficult to setup an environment for python2/Qt4.
I understand. But as a result you're going to spend unnecessarily lot of time working around the restrictions.
This is unfortunate as with containerisation you can greatly enhance your development performance.
It should work on an older Debian as from the point of view of the build tooling we use, it's basically the same as Ubuntu. If you don't like containers, maybe then a simple chroot, using debootstrap, should work, assuming you are also not super low on disk space. |
debootstrap!!
|
My life is totally killing time.
|
The debootstrap method works almost perfectly!
PyBitmessage powered by Python 2.7 + PyQt4 launched successfully! There are troubles with sounds, but they may be acceptable now. But, beowulf (buster) is oldoldstable, so when Devuan (Debian) released next major version, it will be dropped, and this bootstrap method will be unable. |
I have managed to build Qt4 by two days long surgery. Then, I tried debootstrap method, and almost perfectly succeeded in ten minutes. |
Debian 10 LTS buster will be dropped on June 30th, 2024, which is the last version including Python2 deb package >_< |
How to setup the development environment which is identical to the one core developers are using?
That must be a good old Python 2.7 + PyQt4 environment.
Usual Linux distributions already dropped them since now is the era of Python 3 + PyQt6.
Although it is far from perfect, I already managed to run PyBitmessage on Python3 + PyQt6, but I found it is not sufficient to be merged to the official repository, anyway.
So I changed the strategy to issue pull requests that seem to be easily accepted to the current PyBitmessage for Python 2.7 + PyQt4.
But there is no easy way to setup a development environment.
I already found and installed PyPy, which is still support Python 2.7.
But I wonder the core developers are using PyPy or not?
PyQt4 may be exist to be installed by pip.
But that can be installed really?
Theoretically, anything can be installed by compiling from the source code, but is it the way the core developers are doing?
Another way, Debian GNU/Linux oldoldoldoldoldstable version is still support Python 2.7 + PyQt4, so I could managed to run PyBitmessage on that environment.
But I wonder the core developers are using such oldoldoldoldoldstable version of a Linux?
Please give me some hints :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: