Figures for the paper

[gully]

Possible Ideas:

1. Teff and logg compared to theory and observations of Class I, II, and/or III young stars
2. Spectrum with example composite model (optionally extinction curves, etc)
3. Distribution of inferred solid angle ratio
4. Distribution of r_K
5. Corner plot for a subset of other interesting parameters?
6. Visualization of priors over the posteriors?
7. Constraints from independent information-- photometry, etc.

[gully]

It'd be great if we could get the patch labels into the legend for the Cottaar KDE's in the first figure. It doesn't work for some reason. Backup is just put the description in the caption, which is what we're doing now.

[gully]

Here is my new favorite spectrum figure:
S68N_spectrum.pdf

[gully]

Whoops, here is a png of it:

[gully]

The distribution of r_K and solid angle ratio is not super clean, since it's confounded with the disk temperature, and to lesser but notable degree surface gravity and stellar effective temperature. Therefore the distribution plot is not visually compelling. Ideally we would do a 4 or 5 dimensional projection, but this is too difficult to represent on 2 dimensions...

[gully]

[gully]

Well, I suppose it's sort of neat that the temperature scales with solid angle ratio (as you'd expect), but there's no action in the vertical dimension. I assume the vertical action is a combination of logg and effective temperature (line depths compressed by veiling), but no single dimension provides a clear story.

[gully]

The corner plot doesn't seem necessary-- what story does it tell? Currently that story is: "many of the parameters are underconstrained", which does not warrant a half page. The logg-teff pane is embedded in context with the theory and observations. Maybe a separate figure about the disk properties is OK, or maybe just a marginal distribution on r_K.