You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for this script, it surely makes life easier :)
When used with several files, displaying the correct label is a bit of a heuristic process, though. I could rename my files, but generally, perhaps it could be improved
What do you think about the following heuristic for labeling:
split file names on a set of strings such as ., _, -
count the occurrences in each bin in the split (we care about 1 vs. many)
many bins are selected for label names
1 bins (common for all) can become the title
I wouldn't mind PRing this
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Apologies for replying to this 1.5y later. My bad!
Each file represents a latency curve to plot. Plotting move curves allows for comparing different variants. I think that giving the self-explanatory name to the file which describes a given variant tested is not only a good thing but in many cases necessary to make sense of the data (especially when looking back at test results some time later).
For this reason, I thought using the filename would have been the easiest way to get a meaningful label with the least amount of effort. Otherwise, you need some way to associate a label (text) to each filename.
Looking at the scheme you proposed, I'm not sure I fully understand we would achieve such a result.
Thank you for this script, it surely makes life easier :)
When used with several files, displaying the correct label is a bit of a heuristic process, though. I could rename my files, but generally, perhaps it could be improved
What do you think about the following heuristic for labeling:
.
,_
,-
many
bins are selected for label names1
bins (common for all) can become the titleI wouldn't mind PRing this
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: