You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Even that it won't be a 100% effective method at all times because easily some Discord user can censor there username with some typo modification we can still try it on the usernames even when there's some typo censorship!! this is an example: let's think that "muscle" is an inappropiate word so the bot will detect and it will show the username on the new inappropriate username channel so (the mods and up) can see it and then kick/ban him, but if the name it's censored like this "mvscl3" we can simply put in the bot typo detections just to find out the usernames like this: mu5cle, nnuscle, musçle and etc.
Over time this detection method would get improved over time little by little just to make this more precise on the detections.
It would make our moderations jobs much more easy and affective
Even that it wouldn't work at 100% of the times we have the join-log and ourselves just to check in so no problems at the end.
This suggestion is subject to change just to improve on it and to be just more agreeable
From: DominantLuigi
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Even that it won't be a 100% effective method at all times because easily some Discord user can censor there username with some typo modification we can still try it on the usernames even when there's some typo censorship!! this is an example: let's think that "muscle" is an inappropiate word so the bot will detect and it will show the username on the new inappropriate username channel so (the mods and up) can see it and then kick/ban him, but if the name it's censored like this "mvscl3" we can simply put in the bot typo detections just to find out the usernames like this: mu5cle, nnuscle, musçle and etc.
Over time this detection method would get improved over time little by little just to make this more precise on the detections.
It would make our moderations jobs much more easy and affective
Even that it wouldn't work at 100% of the times we have the join-log and ourselves just to check in so no problems at the end.
This suggestion is subject to change just to improve on it and to be just more agreeable
From: DominantLuigi
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: