-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Parameter Testing] KPP vs ePBL vertical mixing #243
Comments
Velocity truncations, likely caused by initial conditions, happen only on the second day of a 5 model year run. The affected locations can be visualised in this notebook. Update on 9 Dec 2024: |
Minghang pointed out that the truncation errors are occurring only with the ePBL mixing for the 0.25° configuration using the new grids and topography. These errors are happening consecutively for 5 years. Anton mentioned that the ice shelf may have retreated compared to the previous GEBCO data, which might explain the presence of a new channel. @aekiss Would a topography edit be required in this case, given that the issue arises only with the ePBL mixing? |
Truncations are still present when dt and dt_cpl are reduced to 900s while keeping dt_therm=10800s. A comparison between the OM3 and OM2 topos is provided below: As noted by @aekiss, the two topos are quite similar to each other. |
Using a 900s timestep results in a ~27% reduction in runtime performance compared to the one using 1080s. Given this big decrease, it seems unlikely that we will further reduce the timestep. The current ePBL parameters are configured according to the OM5 setup, excluding the Langmuir parameterisation. |
To troubleshoot if this truncation occurred due to the frequency of ice-ocean coupling, dt was still 900s, but dt_cpl was set to 1080s and no truncation was observed. |
This issue has been mentioned on ACCESS Hive Community Forum. There might be relevant details there: https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/cosima-twg-meeting-minutes-2024/1734/22 |
This comment is related to salinity restoring (related #167).Option1: Black solid lines - KPP (Control)
Option5: Gray dashed lines - OM2-0.25deg ryf Comments:
Plots are available https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-eval-recipes/blob/main/ocean/Salinity_restoring.ipynb |
The salinity value at the crash location is high, |
Following this comment, #167 (comment)
The updated topography is noted, but are we still using the default value for |
Yes, we haven't changed |
Parameter Tests Description
The test is as follows,
Expts_manager Version
dd38b80
YAML input file
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: