Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wastewater charges #486

Open
patwater opened this issue Nov 27, 2018 · 3 comments
Open

Wastewater charges #486

patwater opened this issue Nov 27, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@patwater
Copy link
Contributor

One noted enhancement of OWRS would be to add in wastewater rates. Chris what are your thoughts on how to incorporate?

Thinking this would be a separate section of each OWRS file that follows the same fixed / volumetric breakdown.

In terms of existing data sources, the Water Boards collects and issue the annual Wastewater User Charge Survey Report

https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/grants_loans/srf/docs/fy1617/fy1617ww_user_charge_survey.pdf

And here you may find those reports since 1996-97

https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/publications_forms/publications/general/#Ww

Also worth looking at EPAs clean watersheds Needs Survey that assess the capital investment needed for publicly-owned wastewater collection and treatment facilities to meet the water quality goals of the Clean Water Act.

https://www.epa.gov/cwns

h/t RM

@christophertull
Copy link
Member

So this is something we actually support more-or-less already, but it is not documented in the OWRS repo and we didn't emphasize it during data collection. I think we may have commented out the sections of the survey that collect WW rate info before sending out it out last year.

The basic approach just adds additional sections that append _wastewater like below:

FIRE_SERVICE:
    service_charge:
      depends_on:
        - meter_size
      values:
        1": 7.63
        2": 7.63
        3": 22.15
        4": 47.19
        6": 137.08
        8": 292.11
        10": 525.31
        12": 848.52
    commodity_charge: flat_rate_commodity*usage_ccf
    flat_rate_commodity: 0
    fixed_drought_surcharge: 0
    variable_drought_surcharge: 0
    fixed_wastewater_charge: 0
    variable_wastewater_charge: 0
    bill: service_charge+commodity_charge 

Then the bill calculation would need to become

bill: service_charge+commodity_charge+fixed_wastewater_charge+variable_wastewater_charge

In terms of todos, mainly seems like

  • Document this in the README
  • Peruse the references listed to make sure the rateparser supports most common types of WW rates.
  • Test with the survey and make sure everything is actually working the way I think it works.

@patwater
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ah great! For exhaustiveness, are there budget based wastewater rates? How would that be specified?

@christophertull
Copy link
Member

I believe yes, but would need to dig into the source of the rateparser and refresh my memory.

Count that in the "update documentation" bullet.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants