You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Just noticed (I'm a little slow! :-)) that the sensor measurement event doesn't include a "type". Method is there but it might be handy to have type just in case the same method is used multiple times e.g. in a device the records high and low temperatures.
measurement.type exists; measurement_taxonomy revised for clarity. Above example can be handled in current implementation, though we would need to enable extension to the taxonomy. I suspect that we need to permit on-the-fly types here, owing to the variety of stuff out there.
Should I revise the taxonomy to suggest that this can be extended by locally determined values if required? Then, the listed ones are simply there to map to, if appropriate, or as examples, but not prescriptive.
Just noticed (I'm a little slow! :-)) that the sensor measurement event doesn't include a "type". Method is there but it might be handy to have type just in case the same method is used multiple times e.g. in a device the records high and low temperatures.
Might be worth considering a taxonomy of known types too.
What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: