-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 374
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Anyway to make the faraday instrumentation split by domain but allow an override to not split by domain in some cases? #3719
Comments
Hey @alexevanczuk, does the webhooks you mention have a single call site? |
Yes @marcotc , it has a single call site. Let me know what you're thinking, sounds like maybe there is a simple way to make this change by updating how tracing is done at that callsite? |
This class of issue (service naming for third-party services) is being addressed with the introduction of Inferred Service dependencies. Inferred services allow for you to decide after the fact what's important and what's not. It also represents these external entities better in the Service Map and Services page. We are moving towards enabling Inferred services by default in the future, but if you think you can opt into the beta, I think you would get a much improved experience for the services created from the Faraday request. If you need a solution in the meantime, I think adding a Faraday middleware would work best here: class WebhookServiceNameMiddleware < Faraday::Middleware
def on_request(env)
if env['from_webhook'] # We have to set this value at the call site.
Datadog::Tracing.active_span.service = 'all-my-webhooks'
# or `Datadog.configuration.env`, if you don't want a new service created for these.
# Datadog::Tracing.active_span.service = Datadog.configuration.env
end
end
end |
Thanks @marcotc , that sounds great, thanks for sharing that context. I opted into the beta and will discuss with my team about turning this on. Appreciate it! |
I think one thing I don't fully understand @marcotc is how things are inferred and grouped. Say we have ImportantVendorA, ImportantVendorB, and WebhookEndpointA-Z. It'd be great to see the separate important vendors in their own service so we can dig into just that service dependency (e.g. integrating with the google API). Can you share more information about the mechanics behind how the inferred dependencies are grouped? |
We use the
split_by_domain
option with the faraday instrumentation, which is really helpful to see information about how we interact with 3rd parties.However, we have a webhooks system which calls out to an arbitrary number of 3rd party systems. I'd like all of these webhook calls to have a single service (e.g. outbound_webhooks) and to have the URL just be a tag on the spans.
Is this possible today?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: