You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For example I have a package. I nest a module deeply, so the exported functions in that module will have long prefix specifying the module structure, e.g., in this page, numerov_iter shows as . Is that the way the prefix supposed to be? Is there a way for not showing NumericalMethodsInQuantumMechanics? It is apparent that this function is bonded to this package.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
singularitti
changed the title
The name for each method is too long
The prefixes for some methods are too long
Jul 11, 2019
I don't think anything exists to drop the prefix at the moment. In general, I would say that you want the prefix to be there since you want to make it clear what function it is exactly.
But we could consider having an at-meta option that allows you to, say, set the module to which the identifiers should be relative to. I'd be happy to review a PR implementing something like that.
For example I have a package. I nest a module deeply, so the exported functions in that module will have long prefix specifying the module structure, e.g., in this page,
numerov_iter
shows as. Is that the way the prefix supposed to be? Is there a way for not showing
NumericalMethodsInQuantumMechanics
? It is apparent that this function is bonded to this package.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: