Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

.kdbg format and variants #143

Open
MatthewRalston opened this issue Jul 14, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

.kdbg format and variants #143

MatthewRalston opened this issue Jul 14, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees
@MatthewRalston
Labels
bug Something isn't working documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed invalid This doesn't seem right question Further information is requested wontfix This will not be worked on
Milestone
v0.8 D2, node, ed...

Comments

@MatthewRalston
Copy link
Owner

[Update 4 to the Assembly Algorithm project]https://github.com/users/MatthewRalston/projects/4

The goal of the alternate format (adjacency list structure) instead of the current 0.7.7 vanilla .kdbg spec would be to abbreviate known paths, potentially stored in an additional output file (.kdbg.stats.paths)

--[ ] .kdbg
--[ ] .kdb.gi
--[ ] .kdbg.stats.paths.tsv (--sparse adjacency list structure : new spec for tsv [ .paths vs .edges ]
--[ ].kdbg.stats.edges.tsv (currently, identical to the 0.7.7 spec for .kdbg)
--[ ] .kdbg.log
@MatthewRalston MatthewRalston converted this from a draft issue Jul 14, 2024
@MatthewRalston MatthewRalston self-assigned this Jul 14, 2024
@MatthewRalston MatthewRalston added bug Something isn't working documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed good first issue Good for newcomers invalid This doesn't seem right question Further information is requested wontfix This will not be worked on labels Jul 14, 2024
@MatthewRalston MatthewRalston added this to the V0.7 stable? milestone Jul 14, 2024
@MatthewRalston
Copy link
Owner Author

v0.7 was deprecated... and some usage changes happened, and now were at a different version. version 0.12.x wil be the next pre-alpha revelation.

@MatthewRalston
Copy link
Owner Author

Currently, just thinking of index files, to get the different side-formats and shape exploratory combinations of data out of the way.

@MatthewRalston MatthewRalston moved this from Ready to In progress in Assembly algorithm (0.7.7+) Jul 14, 2024
@MatthewRalston
Copy link
Owner Author

Still thinking at this point that the system should use intermediary formats.

@MatthewRalston
Copy link
Owner Author

Just checking in, nothing to report, still working on a presentation, some system config, and the white paper template. Also, idk

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@MatthewRalston MatthewRalston

Labels
bug Something isn't working documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed invalid This doesn't seem right question Further information is requested wontfix This will not be worked on
Projects
Assembly algorithm (0.7.7+)
Status: In progress
Milestone
v0.8 D2, node, edge, path formats, no...
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@MatthewRalston