We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Describe the bug Hi, I'm running into an issue with creating an amalgamated table of enumerated values from this source definition below.
To Reproduce Here is a screenshot of the source definition:
Actual behaviour This produces this table with only the enum values from the first property:
Expected behaviour Was hoping for a complete table with all the enum values, like this:
This is a long shot and I understand that having a distinct 'items' dictionary might be causing this behaviour with Widdershins.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Describe the bug
Hi, I'm running into an issue with creating an amalgamated table of enumerated values from this source definition below.
To Reproduce
Here is a screenshot of the source definition:
Actual behaviour
This produces this table with only the enum values from the first property:
Expected behaviour
Was hoping for a complete table with all the enum values, like this:
This is a long shot and I understand that having a distinct 'items' dictionary might be causing this behaviour with Widdershins.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: