Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can't transfer from Ganache to Hardhat node through metamask #4408

Closed
Ujjwalvinze opened this issue Sep 21, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Can't transfer from Ganache to Hardhat node through metamask #4408

Ujjwalvinze opened this issue Sep 21, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@Ujjwalvinze
Copy link

Version of Hardhat

2.17.3

What happened?

I tried to transfer some of the ganache tokens (hosted on localhost 7545) to an account of hardhat node (hosted on localhost 8545). I imported the node account in metamask and conected to ganache chain.
When I tried to send the tokens it won't let me proceed further after adding the account. The "next" button on metamask is greyed out.
I saw on terminal and saw this error multiple times.

eth_estimateGas

If you think this is a bug in Hardhat, please report it here: https://hardhat.org/report-bug

Minimal reproduction steps

Just try to transfer tokens from any chain to node through metamask. I tried with ganache

Search terms

Can't transfer tokens from ganache to hardhat node

@fvictorio
Copy link
Member

You can't transfer tokens from one chain to another using Metamask, even if they are both development networks. You need some sort of bridge for that, which is out of scope for Hardhat.

@fvictorio fvictorio closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Sep 26, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Ready to Done in Hardhat Sep 26, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 26, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants