Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can we improve the Introduction / Need decription? #650

Open
zimeon opened this issue Sep 14, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Can we improve the Introduction / Need decription? #650

zimeon opened this issue Sep 14, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
Editorial Editorial issues (no changes to intent)
Milestone

Comments

@zimeon
Copy link
Contributor

zimeon commented Sep 14, 2024

The idea and most of the Need section is really good. I think there are opportunities to improve two of the five requirements descriptions:

  • Versioning - I'm not sure how accessible the term "forward delta" is, it would not take much to be explicit and say we store only new and changed files. Also, we don't mention that this is an efficient strategy wrt storage use.
  • Storage diversity - Should we be bold and say something about our hope that the simple approach that works with the range of current options hopefully sets us up with a good chance of working well on future storage technologies?
@zimeon zimeon added the Editorial Editorial issues (no changes to intent) label Sep 14, 2024
@awoods
Copy link
Member

awoods commented Sep 15, 2024

I agree that spelling out the versioning approach of storing new and changed files with a parenthetical mention of "forward delta" would be clarifying.

Also, the "storage diversity" block could be bolstered.

@neilsjefferies
Copy link
Member

With V2 we will have improved support for WORM media and object stores...

@rosy1280 rosy1280 added this to the 2.0 milestone Nov 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Editorial Editorial issues (no changes to intent)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants