diff --git a/tasks/README.md b/tasks/README.md index dbd90d744..e300dd904 100644 --- a/tasks/README.md +++ b/tasks/README.md @@ -1275,29 +1275,6 @@ Name | Summary | Category | Domain | Input Language | Output Language `task1282_ted_translation_pt_fa` | Translate a sentence in Portugese to Farsi. | Translation `task1283_hrngo_quality_classification` | Evaluate quality of system generated reference. | Classification `task1284_hrngo_informativeness_classification` | Evaluate informativeness of system generated reference. | Classification -`task1285_kpa_keypoint_matching_assisted_suicide_topic` | Given an argument and a keypoint under the topic "Assisted suicide should be a criminal offence", answer if the keypoint summarizes the argument | Classification -`task1286_kpa_keypoint_matching_homeschooling_topic` | Given an argument and a keypoint under the topic "Homeschooling should be banned", answer if the keypoint summarizes the argument | Classification -`task1287_kpa_keypoint_matching_marriage_topic` | Given an argument and a keypoint under the topic "We should abandon marriage", answer if the keypoint summarizes the argument | Classification -`task1288_kpa_keypoint_matching_capital_punishment_topic` | Given an argument and a keypoint under the topic "We should abolish capital punishment", answer if the keypoint summarizes the argument | Classification -`task1289_kpa_keypoint_matching_intellectual_property_rights` | Given an argument and a keypoint under the topic "We should abolish intellectual property rights", answer if the keypoint summarizes the argument | Classification -`task1290_kpa_keypoint_matching_atheism_topic` | Given an argument and a keypoint under the topic "We should adopt atheism", answer if the keypoint summarizes the argument | Classification -`task1291_kpa_keypoint_matching_libertarianism_topic` | Given an argument and a keypoint under the topic "We should adopt libertarianism", answer if the keypoint summarizes the argument | Classification -`task1292_kpa_keypoint_matching_human_cloning_topic` | Given an argument and a keypoint under the topic "We should ban human cloning", answer if the keypoint summarizes the argument | Classification -`task1293_kpa_keypoint_matching_military_companies_topic` | Given an argument and a keypoint under the topic "We should ban private military companies", answer if the keypoint summarizes the argument | Classification -`task1294_kpa_keypoint_matching_child_actors_topic` | Given an argument and a keypoint under the topic "We should ban the use of child actors", answer if the keypoint summarizes the argument | Classification -`task1295_kpa_keypoint_matching_guantanamo_bay_detection_camp_topic` | Given an argument and a keypoint under the topic "We should close Guantanamo Bay detention camp", answer if the keypoint summarizes the argument | Classification -`task1296_kpa_keypoint_matching_mandatory_retirement_topic` | Given an argument and a keypoint under the topic "We should end mandatory retirement", answer if the keypoint summarizes the argument | Classification -`task1297_kpa_keypoint_matching_nuclear_weapons_topic` | Given an argument and a keypoint under the topic "We should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons", answer if the keypoint summarizes the argument | Classification -`task1298_kpa_keypoint_matching_urbanization_topic` | Given an argument and a keypoint under the topic "We should fight urbanization", answer if the keypoint summarizes the argument | Classification -`task1299_kpa_keypoint_matching_compulsory_voting` | Given an argument and a keypoint under the topic "We should introduce compulsory voting", answer if the keypoint summarizes the argument | Classification -`task1300_kpa_keypoint_matching_cannabis_topic` | Given an argument and a keypoint under the topic "We should legalize cannabis", answer if the keypoint summarizes the argument | Classification -`task1301_kpa_keypoint_matching_prostitution_topic` | Given an argument and a keypoint under the topic "We should legalize prostitution", answer if the keypoint summarizes the argument | Classification -`task1302_kpa_keypoint_matching_sex_selection_topic` | Given an argument and a keypoint under the topic "We should legalize sex selection", answer if the keypoint summarizes the argument | Classification -`task1303_kpa_keypoint_matching_flag_burning_topic` | Given an argument and a keypoint under the topic "We should prohibit flag burning", answer if the keypoint summarizes the argument | Classification -`task1304_kpa_keypoint_matching_women_in_combat_topic` | Given an argument and a keypoint under the topic "We should prohibit women in combat", answer if the keypoint summarizes the argument | Classification -`task1305_kpa_keypoint_matching_journalism_topic` | Given an argument and a keypoint under the topic "We should subsidize journalism", answer if the keypoint summarizes the argument | Classification -`task1306_kpa_keypoint_matching_space_exploration_topic` | Given an argument and a keypoint under the topic "We should subsidize space exploration", answer if the keypoint summarizes the argument | Classification -`task1307_kpa_keypoint_matching_vocational_education_topic` | Given an argument and a keypoint under the topic "We should subsidize vocational education", answer if the keypoint summarizes the argument | Classification `task1308_amazonreview_category_classification` | You're given a review from Amazon and category of the product based on the review, classify whether review match the category. | Classification `task1309_amazonreview_summary_classification` | You're given a review from Amazon and summary of the review, classify whether summary match the original review. | Classification `task1310_amazonreview_rating_classification` | You're given a review from Amazon. Your task is to generate a rating for the product on a scale of 1-5 based on the review. | Classification diff --git a/tasks/task1285_kpa_keypoint_matching_assisted_suicide_topic.json b/tasks/task1285_kpa_keypoint_matching_assisted_suicide_topic.json deleted file mode 100644 index 3aa46d30d..000000000 --- a/tasks/task1285_kpa_keypoint_matching_assisted_suicide_topic.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2871 +0,0 @@ -{ - "Contributors": [ - "Arjun Ashok" - ], - "Source": [ - "ArgKP (https://github.com/IBM/KPA_2021_shared_task)" - ], - "Definition": "The input contains an argument and a keypoint on the topic \"Assisted suicide should be a criminal offence\", separated by \"\".Your task is to answer if the keypoint matches the argument and summarizes exactly what the argument means, in the context of this topic.", - "Categories": [ - "Classification -> Verification -> Summary Verification", - "Text Comparison" - ], - "Domains": [ - "Reviews", - "Law", - "Dialogue" - ], - "Input_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Output_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Instruction_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Positive Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: It is more humane to help the person die than to let them suffer excruciating painKeypoint: The terminally ill would benefit from assisted suicide", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that it is more humane to help the person die than to let them suffer excruciating pain" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is equivalent to murder and should be treated as such.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that assisted suicide is equivalent to murder and should be treated as such." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It helps relieve some people from tremendous sufferingKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that it helps relieve some people from tremendous suffering" - } - ], - "Negative Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: People who are terminally ill with no hope of survival should be spared the pain and suffering of living.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that people who are terminally ill with no hope of survival should be spared the pain and suffering of living." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be a criminal offence because people shouldn't be able to help murder othersKeypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that assisted suicide should be a criminal offence because people shouldn't be able to help murder others" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide allows for a person who is sick and fully understanding what is done to end their pain when no quality of life can be assuredKeypoint: The terminally ill would benefit from assisted suicide", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that assisted suicide allows for a person who is sick and fully understanding what is done to end their pain when no quality of life can be assured" - } - ], - "Instances": [ - { - "input": "Argument: If someone is suffering from an incurable disease and is in great pain, it can be humane to help end their suffering.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is a personal choice on how a person wants to live his or her life and therefore should be legal by the constitutionKeypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should no be considered a criminal offence because a person could really be suffering and in pain and to let them suffer is heartless and inhumaneKeypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide helps terminally ill people end their sufferingKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Killing another person is wrong and should be bannedKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If you help someone kill themselves that is murder, and should be punished.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People who are terminally ill and don't want to suffer any more have a right to ask for help to end their livesKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a criminal defense because in some cases, like people who have terminal cancer, you are doing them a mercy and saving them from suffering.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If someone has an illness and is in constant pain, helping them end their misery is the humane thing to do and should be understood.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People with terminal illnesses are going to die. by not allowing assisted suicide we are making these people suffer deeply which in inhumane.Keypoint: The terminally ill would benefit from assisted suicide", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is a form of murder and should be a criminal offenseKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People who have terminal illness or suffer from certain medical conditions should have the freedom to choose and if medical personnel helps them it shouldn't be treated as offence.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be a criminal offence because it would be very easy to murder a vulnerable relative in order to get an inheritance.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a criminal offence as people should not be expected to live in vegetative states and need help to make their own decisions to die a reality.Keypoint: The terminally ill would benefit from assisted suicide", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is a lot better than letting a person suffer until end of life.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is killing by another name - it is far too open to abuse by those with a vested interest, since it is often impossible to accurately interpret the intentions of the individual being 'assisted'.Keypoint: Assisted suicide should not be allowed because many times people can still get better", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: No-one has the right to play god and decide to help another person to die.Keypoint: People do not have the right to self-harm/harm others", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: For those with degenerative diseases, assisted suicide is often the only solace they haveKeypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is a crime and people involved should be sent to prisonKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a criminal offence because it helps to ease the suffering of those who will never recover from their illnesses or injuries.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is killing by another name - it is far too open to abuse by those with a vested interest, since it is often impossible to accurately interpret the intentions of the individual being 'assisted'.Keypoint: People do not have the right to self-harm/harm others", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is a human right and would spare the terminally i'll pain.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a person is already diagnosed with only a short time to live and is undergoing excruciating pain, assisted death is a compassionate support for the person.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is a criminal offence as it centers on the intentional death of a human being.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a crime. if someone is suffering on a daily basis from something that they are going to die from anyway, they should be allowed to die on their own terms.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Helping a human being to commit suicide devalues human life and can lead to deaths of unstable people who are not mentally competent to make the decision. it should be criminalized.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is too much potential for exploitation of assisted suicide by malicious relatives that it should be banned as a matter of individual safetyKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide allows terminally ill persons to choose when to die and do it with dignity. it lets people decide not to live in a state of pain and misery and choose to pass on with human intervention.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nobody has the right to take a life.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Being able to die with dignity should be a right. when someone thinks their time has come, they should be able to die comfortable without worrying if having their loved ones nearby would get them jail time.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is a great help for people who suffer from deadly diseases and are on their deathbedKeypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It helps relieve some people from tremendous sufferingKeypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is murder and therefore illegalKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Murder is murder no matter the circumstancesKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide shouldn't be a criminal offence because sometimes the person is in such pain or has no life just laying around in a bedKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a criminal offense since it should be a personal decision what a person wants for themselves. it could prevent months or years of pain for someone with no quality of life.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a criminal offense because when you get so sick with no hope left, one should be able to end the pain.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is just another word for murder.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The hippocratic oath states, \"first, do no harm\" - assisted suicide violates a doctor's duty not to do harm to a patient.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide could be misused by people who want their weaker partner to die. people could be encouraged to take their own life before they really want to.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some diseases are life threatening and can put a person in a no-living state. these situations are hard to bear for the ill person and for his family and relatives. only assisted suicide can make this easeKeypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisting with suicide is helping kill someone, and should be treated as such. the intent of the victim doesn't matter, murder is murder.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Death with dignity is having the option to decide your own fate. you're able to take control of your own fate. it allows you to leave the world with your true self intact.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide allows people who have terrible health conditions to die with dignity. if assisted suicide is a crime they may have to endure many more years living in agony.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is too much potential for exploitation of assisted suicide by malicious relatives that it should be banned as a matter of individual safetyKeypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide would relieve much suffering by those with a terminal illness that is too much to bear.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is killing someone even if it is at their requestKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a person is already diagnosed with only a short time to live and is undergoing excruciating pain, assisted death is a compassionate support for the person.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is killing someone even if it is at their requestKeypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People and family members must decide what they want to do with their life and bodyKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a criminal offense because if a person doesn't want to live, why should they be forced toKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If someone has an illness and is in constant pain, helping them end their misery is the humane thing to do and should be understood.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a criminal offense because when a person get gravely ill they should not have to keep on suffering.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be a criminal offense because it's just a different name for murderKeypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisting suicide is the same of assisting murder. both are crimes.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assited suicide allows those with a painful and terminal illness the ability to chose to end their life to cease the pain and suffering that would last for the end of their lives.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be a criminal offence because the person is basically killing the other person.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is a great help for people who suffer from deadly diseases and are on their deathbedKeypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a criminal offense because it helps people who are in constant pain due to a terminal illnessKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is just like accessory to murderKeypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If someone wants to die they shouldn't have to stay alive, so helping them to die is the beat thing to do. that shouldn't be a criminal offence.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some diseases are life threatening and can put a person in a no-living state. these situations are hard to bear for the ill person and for his family and relatives. only assisted suicide can make this easeKeypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: No matter how much suffering we have in life nothing justifies death in the same way i think that a sick person is not in the capacity of whether he wants to live or notKeypoint: People who are ill do not have clear judgement and are in need of help", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some patients have the utmost suffering and must end it as soon as possibleKeypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nobody has the right to take someone else's life.Keypoint: People do not have the right to self-harm/harm others", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is another form of homicideKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many people are suffering terribly but are physically incapable of dying on their ownKeypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a criminal offence because a person should be able to decide how and when they want to die.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide must be allowed. if a terminally ill person wants to end their life, allow them the peace of being able to with the help of a professional instead of potentially making it worse on their own.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is just another form of murder. murder is illegal so assisted suicide must be illegal as well.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is a criminal offense to kill someone and that is what someone assisting a person in committing suicide is doing.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The end of life can be painful and humiliating, and we should allow people the right to decide when they are ready to end their own suffering.Keypoint: The terminally ill would benefit from assisted suicide", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide sometimes is the only thing that ends suffering.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A patient should be able to decide when they have had enough \"care\".Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People have the right to their bodies and if they wish to die they should be able to get help to do so.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be a criminal offence as if the person cannot make their own decisions and actions then it would be impossible to know if the person helping wasn't just murdering them.Keypoint: Assisted suicide should not be allowed because many times people can still get better", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a patient is suffering with cancer or other painful conditions, they should have a right to end their sufferingKeypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: An assisted suicide is just another way to murder a person. it does not matter if the person asked to be killed the person who does the killing has put one to death.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The person assisting in an assisted suicide is committing murder and should be chargedKeypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Everyone should have the right to chose the direction they want to take, if someone is in unbearable pain with no quality of life then they should have the right to seek assistance.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Asisted suicide can be abused by those who want to benefit from taking advantage of a sick or ill relative and thus should not be allowed.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When people are in unbearable pain and suffering and have no chance of getting better it is cruel to keep them alive without their consentKeypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a criminal offence as people with no quality of life should not have to suffer indefinitely and their trusted helper should not be a criminal for helping them.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The hippocratic oath states, \"first, do no harm\" - assisted suicide violates a doctor's duty not to do harm to a patient.Keypoint: Assisted suicide violates the doctor's role", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be a form of murder or pre meditated murder. people should die naturally not by suicide.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide would save terminally i'll people pain and suffering.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be allowed to die with dignity if they choose to.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: For those with degenerative diseases, assisted suicide is often the only solace they haveKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be free to help people out of their pain by helping them commit suicide without the fear of prosecutionKeypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People and family members must decide what they want to do with their life and bodyKeypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is killing by another name - it is far too open to abuse by those with a vested interest, since it is often impossible to accurately interpret the intentions of the individual being 'assisted'.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be a form of murder or pre meditated murder. people should die naturally not by suicide.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide allows one to end terminal pain and suffering and should be allowed to continue.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be allowed in certain circumstances such as when a person is suffering from severe illnesses.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People have the right to die on their own terms and in their own timeKeypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide and the right to live with dignity is a human right and should be made legal everywhere. it is a human right to choose not to suffer with a terminal illness.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be a criminal offence because that is murderKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is just murder by another name and it should be punished accordingly.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Killing another person is wrong and should be bannedKeypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is no difference between assisted suicide and being an accessory to murder. suicide is immoral and those that help should be punished.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It should be a criminal offence because someone that may feel suicidal now might not feel that ay a few weeks down the line. they could go on to live a normal life if they get over the suicidal thoughts.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is murder of another and should be considered a criminal offence.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If people has a life ending illness they should be allowed to dieKeypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People who are terminally ill with no hope of survival should be spared the pain and suffering of living.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Suicide is a form of murder and those who attempt it can be convicted. assisting someone to commit suicide can therefore be considered an accomplice.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisting suicide is the same of assisting murder. both are crimes.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is nothing but murder. you are giving a human the ability to legally kill another. this should be stopped. no person should be allowed to cause a death of another.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A person has the right to end their suffering and if somebody takes pity on them and chooses to help, that person should not be punished.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide shouldn't be a criminal offence because sometimes the person is in such pain or has no life just laying around in a bedKeypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People may easily be manipulated into being a victim of assisted suicide by relatives with alterior motivesKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is nothing short of murder and it should be a criminal offence.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be criminalized as no human being has the right to determine whether another human being lives or diesKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is just like accessory to murderKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is too dangerous as if someone is weak and feeble a manipulative person could encourage them to kill themselves when they do not really want to.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Being able to die with dignity should be a right. when someone thinks their time has come, they should be able to die comfortable without worrying if having their loved ones nearby would get them jail time.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sometimes people are so ill they have no quality of life and want to end it themselves but are physically unable ot do so, in thee cases it is only merciful for it to be legal for someone to help them.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicides are less painful and are an act of mercyKeypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be a criminal offence because pain makes people do some extreme things, but it shouldn't include death.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Helping someone commit suicide is like killing them yourself.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assited suicide allows those with a painful and terminal illness the ability to chose to end their life to cease the pain and suffering that would last for the end of their lives.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If to a reasonable degree of medical certainty the medical condition of a person is irreversible, it must have the right to terminate his life by requesting assistance without consequences for the fact.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisting to suicide is still an accessory to murderKeypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is not only immoral but is also a form of murder and should be a criminal offence.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a criminal offence as people with no quality of life should not have to suffer indefinitely and their trusted helper should not be a criminal for helping them.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a criminal offence because if someone doesn't want to live they shouldn't be forced toKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People who are terminally ill and suffering greatly should have the right to end their own life if they so desire.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be allowed to die with dignity instead of suffering a long painful death.Keypoint: The terminally ill would benefit from assisted suicide", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should have the right to die. some people who are severely suffering without hope should be able to end their lives. sometimes this cannot be done without assistance.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be allowed to die with dignity if they choose to.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People who have no hope of living should have a choice to end their lifeKeypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is a great help for people who suffer from deadly diseases and are on their deathbedKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is more humane to help the person die than to let them suffer excruciating painKeypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People who are terminally ill and suffering greatly should have the right to end their own life if they so desire.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide sometimes is the only thing that ends suffering.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be a criminal offence because people shouldn't be able to help murder othersKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is the same as murder and therefore should be illegal.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be an option just because people are in pain as there are other options to help with thisKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Ending a life is unlawful regardless of the reason.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Being able to die with dignity should be a right. when someone thinks their time has come, they should be able to die comfortable without worrying if having their loved ones nearby would get them jail time.Keypoint: The terminally ill would benefit from assisted suicide", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Suicide is a criminal offense, thus assisting in suicide would be acting as an accomplice to murder.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is murder and therefore illegalKeypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide allows terminally ill persons to choose when to die and do it with dignity. it lets people decide not to live in a state of pain and misery and choose to pass on with human intervention.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be a criminal offence because killing someone is wrong even if they want you to do itKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is murder, the doctor is giving the weapon to the person with the sole purpose of death.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is a form of murder and should be a criminal offenseKeypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a criminal defense because in some cases, like people who have terminal cancer, you are doing them a mercy and saving them from suffering.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People have the right to die on their own terms and in their own timeKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is a crime and people involved should be sent to prisonKeypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is unfair to force someone with a terminal illness to continue to suffer greatly when they are just dying anyway. the only humane and compassionate way to help them is to allow assisted suicide.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People willing to die, it's their choice, should be able to leave this world in a civil way and helped with assisted suicide when neededKeypoint: The terminally ill would benefit from assisted suicide", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is a form of murder and should be treated as a crimeKeypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is another form of homicideKeypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is not only immoral but is also a form of murder and should be a criminal offence.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It shouldn't be an offence because is someone is seriously ill and in pain they have the right to end their own life if they are suffering.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide allows one to end terminal pain and suffering and should be allowed to continue.Keypoint: The terminally ill would benefit from assisted suicide", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is no difference between assisted suicide and being an accessory to murder. suicide is immoral and those that help should be punished.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: No matter how much suffering we have in life nothing justifies death in the same way i think that a sick person is not in the capacity of whether he wants to live or notKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This is effectively commiting murder; no one has the right to take another person's lifeKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People need to die on their own as this would be almost like murder.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisting to suicide is still an accessory to murderKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Suicide has never been legal. it is still killing, even if one is taking ones own life.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is still one person essentially killing anotherKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a person is already diagnosed with only a short time to live and is undergoing excruciating pain, assisted death is a compassionate support for the person.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Giving someone the medicine to end a life other than natural causes is assisting in murder.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide allows people who have terrible health conditions to die with dignity. if assisted suicide is a crime they may have to endure many more years living in agony.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Yes, because it is murder practically and this is considered a crimeKeypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People who have no hope of living should have a choice to end their lifeKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be a criminal offence because no one has a right to take another persons life or to help themKeypoint: People do not have the right to self-harm/harm others", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People wanting to commit suicide need mental and emotional help, not help in carrying out their plans to end their own lives.Keypoint: People who are ill do not have clear judgement and are in need of help", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide helps those who are in pain due to a devastating disease end their own lives on their own terms.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People who are suffering with terminal illnesses with no hope of cure and in immense pain should be allowed to end their suffering. it's safer and painless done in a doctor's care rather than their own devices.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should choose what to do with their lives, even if it means ending it in whatever manner they chooseKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: An assisted suicide is just another way to murder a person. it does not matter if the person asked to be killed the person who does the killing has put one to death.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Helping a human being to commit suicide devalues human life and can lead to deaths of unstable people who are not mentally competent to make the decision. it should be criminalized.Keypoint: People who are ill do not have clear judgement and are in need of help", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People have a basic right to bodily autonomy, deciding whether or not to die with minimal suffering and dignity is integral to that right.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a criminal offence because a person should be able to decide how and when they want to die.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If you help someone kill themselves that is murder, and should be punished.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If someone is suffering from an incurable disease and is in great pain, it can be humane to help end their suffering.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be a criminal offense because at the end of the day somebody is dead and you had a hand in it.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We cannot allow people to assist suicide because there is a fine line between assistance and murder and to have to differentiate is complex ground.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is a form of murder and should never be allowed.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: No doctor should take part in killing , it is their job to healKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a criminal offence because it helps to ease the suffering of those who will never recover from their illnesses or injuries.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide shouldn't be a criminal offence because sometimes the person is in such pain or has no life just laying around in a bedKeypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Helping someone kill themself is murderKeypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide allows terminally ill people to die with dignity and should not be criminalizedKeypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Death with dignity is having the option to decide your own fate. you're able to take control of your own fate. it allows you to leave the world with your true self intact.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is necessary in our modern world full of people dealing with pain and sorrowKeypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should have the right to die. some people who are severely suffering without hope should be able to end their lives. sometimes this cannot be done without assistance.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: No-one has the right to play god and decide to help another person to die.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some diseases are life threatening and can put a person in a no-living state. these situations are hard to bear for the ill person and for his family and relatives. only assisted suicide can make this easeKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a person who is dying anyway wants to end their life in a peaceful way then they should be able to do so.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People wanting to commit suicide need mental and emotional help, not help in carrying out their plans to end their own lives.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide allows terminally ill people to die with dignity and should not be criminalizedKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be an option just because people are in pain as there are other options to help with thisKeypoint: Assisted suicide should not be allowed because many times people can still get better", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is a criminal offense to kill someone and that is what someone assisting a person in committing suicide is doing.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Allowing assisted suicide would enable greedy relatives to take advantage of ill relatives for their own financial gainKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should have the right to die. some people who are severely suffering without hope should be able to end their lives. sometimes this cannot be done without assistance.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Providing someone the means to kill themselves is equivalent to pulling the trigger yourselfKeypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: And who defines reasonable certainty, how many people evicted by medicine has regained health thanks to an alternative treatment or a medical advance, ending life is not the solution, much less involving othersKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nobody has the right to take someone else's life.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Suicide should never be allowed and helping a person should be treated as murder. no person has the right to take a life. each person should be treated humanely and encouraged to live their natural life span.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is a humane and caring way to allow a person to help another person whose life is too difficult to be lived properly in any manner, so it should not be criminalized.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is just helping a person kill a person which seems like i should be a criminal offence.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Suicide is a form of murder and those who attempt it can be convicted. assisting someone to commit suicide can therefore be considered an accomplice.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A cure or treatment may be discovered shortly after having ended someone's life unnecessarily.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If not a criminal offence it could encourage murder under the guise of assisted suicide that would be difficult to prove.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If not a criminal offence it could encourage murder under the guise of assisted suicide that would be difficult to prove.Keypoint: Assisted suicide should not be allowed because many times people can still get better", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is a form of murder and should never be allowed.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is still one person essentially killing anotherKeypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide helps terminally ill people end their sufferingKeypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a criminal defense because in some cases, like people who have terminal cancer, you are doing them a mercy and saving them from suffering.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a person only has weeks to live, then assisted suicide may be the answer if all other possibilities have been exhaussted.Keypoint: The terminally ill would benefit from assisted suicide", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide usually involves a terminal medical patient that is tired of fighting and being in agony. they should be allowed to 'check out' and receive help doing so.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is a human right and would spare the terminally i'll pain.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be able to ask for help in ending their own life if they are living with an incurable disease.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Suicide is illegal and so is killing, so how is assisted suicide going to be legal?Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a criminal offence because it is sometimes the only way a person suffering a debilitating medical condition such as motor neurone disease can end there life.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide allows one to end terminal pain and suffering and should be allowed to continue.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People who are terminally ill and don't want to suffer any more have a right to ask for help to end their livesKeypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be a criminal offence because killing is wrong whether it is willingly or notKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a criminal offence because it is sometimes the only way a person suffering a debilitating medical condition such as motor neurone disease can end there life.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: And who defines reasonable certainty, how many people evicted by medicine has regained health thanks to an alternative treatment or a medical advance, ending life is not the solution, much less involving othersKeypoint: Assisted suicide should not be allowed because many times people can still get better", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be a criminal offense because it's just a different name for murderKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be allowed in certain circumstances such as when a person is suffering from severe illnesses.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This would protect someone who's judgement may be impairedKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a criminal offence because it helps to ease the suffering of those who will never recover from their illnesses or injuries.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People must be able to decide what to do or not with their lives therefore assisted suicide is an alternativeKeypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be a criminal offence because that is murderKeypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The end of life can be painful and humiliating, and we should allow people the right to decide when they are ready to end their own suffering.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Terminally ill patients who just don't want to continue suffering have a valid reason to contemplate suicide, and someone who wants to help ease their pain should not be punished.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is unfair to force someone with a terminal illness to continue to suffer greatly when they are just dying anyway. the only humane and compassionate way to help them is to allow assisted suicide.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Helping someone commit suicide is like killing them yourself.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should have the right to decide how and when they want to die, particularly if they are suffering from a terminal illnessKeypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a person who is dying anyway wants to end their life in a peaceful way then they should be able to do so.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many people are suffering terribly but are physically incapable of dying on their ownKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide shouldn't be a criminal offence if they are suffering from an incurable disease, they are going to die anywayKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be a crime to prevent greedy individuals from killing their family member to get their money and propertyKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: For those with degenerative diseases, assisted suicide is often the only solace they haveKeypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be made legal so that those who have a terminal illness or are in uncurable pain can make an informed choice to end their lives with dignity surrounded by those they love.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be a criminal offence because killing someone is wrong even if they want you to do itKeypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A cure or treatment may be discovered shortly after having ended someone's life unnecessarily.Keypoint: Assisted suicide should not be allowed because many times people can still get better", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is killing by another name - it is far too open to abuse by those with a vested interest, since it is often impossible to accurately interpret the intentions of the individual being 'assisted'.Keypoint: Assisted suicide violates the doctor's role", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should have the right to decide how and when they want to die, particularly if they are suffering from a terminal illnessKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If to a reasonable degree of medical certainty the medical condition of a person is irreversible, it must have the right to terminate his life by requesting assistance without consequences for the fact.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is murder, the doctor is giving the weapon to the person with the sole purpose of death.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is possible that this could be used as a murder in some cases.Keypoint: Assisted suicide should not be allowed because many times people can still get better", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is just another word for murder.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide would relieve much suffering by those with a terminal illness that is too much to bear.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many people are suffering terribly but are physically incapable of dying on their ownKeypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be a criminal offence because what if the person being assisted was in only a bad emotional state which could be cured with professional health.Keypoint: People who are ill do not have clear judgement and are in need of help", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is unethical how do we know that the person who is assisting the suicide hasnt got something to gain from the death of the other personKeypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Suicide is a criminal offense, thus assisting in suicide would be acting as an accomplice to murder.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a criminal offense because if someone is in enough pain and is sane enough to decide, they should have that choice.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a criminal offence because if someone doesn't want to live they shouldn't be forced toKeypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should choose what to do with their lives, even if it means ending it in whatever manner they chooseKeypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A person should have the dignity to choose how they dieKeypoint: The terminally ill would benefit from assisted suicide", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicides are less painful and are an act of mercyKeypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A person should have the right to be able to choose if they want to live or dieKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Suicide should never be allowed and helping a person should be treated as murder. no person has the right to take a life. each person should be treated humanely and encouraged to live their natural life span.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The person assisting in an assisted suicide is committing murder and should be chargedKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We don't allow our pets to suffer but because of religious doctrine we force humans to die in mental anguish and pain instead of decriminalising assisted suicide so they can die with dignity.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Death with dignity is having the option to decide your own fate. you're able to take control of your own fate. it allows you to leave the world with your true self intact.Keypoint: The terminally ill would benefit from assisted suicide", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Helping someone kill themself is murderKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Everyone should have the right to chose the direction they want to take, if someone is in unbearable pain with no quality of life then they should have the right to seek assistance.Keypoint: The terminally ill would benefit from assisted suicide", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide shouldn't be a criminal offence because every human being should have the right to have someone assist them in passing should they determine they no longer wish to liveKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People who are suffering with terminal illnesses with no hope of cure and in immense pain should be allowed to end their suffering. it's safer and painless done in a doctor's care rather than their own devices.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many people face a cruel and protracted period of suffering before their death so with compassion they should be helped therefore assisted suicide should not be a criminal offence.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be allowed to die with dignity instead of suffering a long painful death.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If to a degree of reasonable certainty the state of seriousness can not be reversed by the medicine, the patient must have the right to end his life and if he needs help for that he should not be condemnedKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A person should have the right to die on their own termsKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should no be considered a criminal offence because a person could really be suffering and in pain and to let them suffer is heartless and inhumaneKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some patients have the utmost suffering and must end it as soon as possibleKeypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The right to die is a personal choice and everyone has the right to make it happen if they truly wishKeypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is more humane to help the person die than to let them suffer excruciating painKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People willing to die, it's their choice, should be able to leave this world in a civil way and helped with assisted suicide when neededKeypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If people has a life ending illness they should be allowed to dieKeypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a patient is suffering with cancer or other painful conditions, they should have a right to end their sufferingKeypoint: The terminally ill would benefit from assisted suicide", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be a criminal offence because killing is wrong whether it is willingly or notKeypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: No one should be able to get away with assisting suicide. it is nothing more than glorified murder. assisting should be replaced by helping these people find a better way to cope with their lives.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisting with suicide is helping kill someone, and should be treated as such. the intent of the victim doesn't matter, murder is murder.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a criminal offense because if a person doesn't want to live, why should they be forced toKeypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a criminal offense because it helps people who are in constant pain due to a terminal illnessKeypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide helps those who are in pain due to a devastating disease end their own lives on their own terms.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It should be a criminal offence because someone that may feel suicidal now might not feel that ay a few weeks down the line. they could go on to live a normal life if they get over the suicidal thoughts.Keypoint: Assisted suicide should not be allowed because many times people can still get better", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Giving someone the medicine to end a life other than natural causes is assisting in murder.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a criminal offense since it should be a personal decision what a person wants for themselves. it could prevent months or years of pain for someone with no quality of life.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be made legal many people suffer with debilitating and painful illnesses and should be counselled and supported to make an informed choiceKeypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: No other person should help you take your lifeKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Death with dignity is having the option to decide your own fate. you're able to take control of your own fate. it allows you to leave the world with your true self intact.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a person only has weeks to live, then assisted suicide may be the answer if all other possibilities have been exhaussted.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A person should have the dignity to choose how they dieKeypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People willing to die, it's their choice, should be able to leave this world in a civil way and helped with assisted suicide when neededKeypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A person should have the dignity to choose how they dieKeypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is a humane and caring way to allow a person to help another person whose life is too difficult to be lived properly in any manner, so it should not be criminalized.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is a blessing not a crime. a person who wants to be assisted in this is in great pain or has no ability to be cured, let someone give the suffering the chance to end it.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide allows for a person who is sick and fully understanding what is done to end their pain when no quality of life can be assuredKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This is effectively commiting murder; no one has the right to take another person's lifeKeypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide goes directly against the oath taken by doctors to do no harm. suicide is harm. there is no oversight when giving the patients the drugs. they are prescribed and the patient faces death alone.Keypoint: Assisted suicide violates the doctor's role", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is a personal choice on how a person wants to live his or her life and therefore should be legal by the constitutionKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a criminal offense because when you get so sick with no hope left, one should be able to end the pain.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is another type of murder.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide goes directly against the oath taken by doctors to do no harm. suicide is harm. there is no oversight when giving the patients the drugs. they are prescribed and the patient faces death alone.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a criminal offense because when you get so sick with no hope left, one should be able to end the pain.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Providing someone the means to kill themselves is equivalent to pulling the trigger yourselfKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Suicide should never be allowed and helping a person should be treated as murder. no person has the right to take a life. each person should be treated humanely and encouraged to live their natural life span.Keypoint: Assisted suicide should not be allowed because many times people can still get better", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is just helping a person kill a person which seems like i should be a criminal offence.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People with terminal illnesses are going to die. by not allowing assisted suicide we are making these people suffer deeply which in inhumane.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It shouldn't be an offence because is someone is seriously ill and in pain they have the right to end their own life if they are suffering.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be a criminal offence because it causes the death of a human being just the same as if taken by a criminal.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Anyone who contributes to ending a life should be punishedKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: `people reach their limit when it comes to their quality of life and should be able to end their suffering. this can be done with little or no suffering by assistance and the person is able to say good bye.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many people face a cruel and protracted period of suffering before their death so with compassion they should be helped therefore assisted suicide should not be a criminal offence.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisting someone with suicide is equivalent to murder and that person has a moral obligation to report that persons intentions to authoritiesKeypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People have a basic right to bodily autonomy, deciding whether or not to die with minimal suffering and dignity is integral to that right.Keypoint: The terminally ill would benefit from assisted suicide", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Terminally ill patients who just don't want to continue suffering have a valid reason to contemplate suicide, and someone who wants to help ease their pain should not be punished.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People that are terminally ill should be able to choose whether they want to have to live suffering or whether they want to end the pain.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It should be a criminal offense to assist in a suicide because that is murder.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be a criminal offence because it causes the death of a human being just the same as if taken by a criminal.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Murder is murder no matter the circumstancesKeypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Yes, because it is murder practically and this is considered a crimeKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People have the right to their bodies and if they wish to die they should be able to get help to do so.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sometimes people who are unable to end their own lives, are in so much pain and anguish that it is cruel to make them keep living, their loved ones need to be able to help them legally.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide allows terminally ill persons to choose when to die and do it with dignity. it lets people decide not to live in a state of pain and misery and choose to pass on with human intervention.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People who are terminally ill and don't want to suffer any more have a right to ask for help to end their livesKeypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide usually involves a terminal medical patient that is tired of fighting and being in agony. they should be allowed to 'check out' and receive help doing so.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is a criminal offence as it centers on the intentional death of a human being.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When people are suffering, it is unfair to force them to continue to do so. if someone can assist them in ending the suffering, they should be able to.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a criminal defense because in some cases, like people who have terminal cancer, you are doing them a mercy and saving them from suffering.Keypoint: The terminally ill would benefit from assisted suicide", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We don't allow our pets to suffer but because of religious doctrine we force humans to die in mental anguish and pain instead of decriminalising assisted suicide so they can die with dignity.Keypoint: The terminally ill would benefit from assisted suicide", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be allowed to die with dignity instead of suffering a long painful death.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A patient should be able to decide when they have had enough \"care\".Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Suicide is illegal and so is killing, so how is assisted suicide going to be legal?Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be a criminal offence as it is another form of murderKeypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is the same as murder and therefore should be illegal.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a patient is suffering with cancer or other painful conditions, they should have a right to end their sufferingKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It should be a criminal offense to assist in a suicide because that is murder.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People have a basic right to bodily autonomy, deciding whether or not to die with minimal suffering and dignity is integral to that right.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is against the oath all doctors take.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many people do not have the mental capacity to comprehend the finality of assisted suicide and it will be abused, and it should be a criminal offence to any persons involved.Keypoint: People who are ill do not have clear judgement and are in need of help", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When people are in unbearable pain and suffering and have no chance of getting better it is cruel to keep them alive without their consentKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should have the right to die if they choose.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many people do not have the mental capacity to comprehend the finality of assisted suicide and it will be abused, and it should be a criminal offence to any persons involved.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be criminalized as no human being has the right to determine whether another human being lives or diesKeypoint: People do not have the right to self-harm/harm others", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Anyone who contributes to ending a life should be punishedKeypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide shouldn't be a criminal offence if they are suffering from an incurable disease, they are going to die anywayKeypoint: The terminally ill would benefit from assisted suicide", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A person has the right to end their suffering and if somebody takes pity on them and chooses to help, that person should not be punished.Keypoint: The terminally ill would benefit from assisted suicide", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicides are less painful and are an act of mercyKeypoint: The terminally ill would benefit from assisted suicide", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is no reason for dying people to suffer unnecessarilyKeypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a criminal offense because it helps people who are in constant pain due to a terminal illnessKeypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a criminal offense because when a person get gravely ill they should not have to keep on suffering.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is nothing short of murder and it should be a criminal offence.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be a criminal offence because what if the person being assisted was in only a bad emotional state which could be cured with professional health.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is against the oath all doctors take.Keypoint: Assisted suicide violates the doctor's role", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is just another form of murder. murder is illegal so assisted suicide must be illegal as well.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is killing by another name - it is far too open to abuse by those with a vested interest, since it is often impossible to accurately interpret the intentions of the individual being 'assisted'.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If someone wants to die they shouldn't have to stay alive, so helping them to die is the beat thing to do. that shouldn't be a criminal offence.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide allows people who have terrible health conditions to die with dignity. if assisted suicide is a crime they may have to endure many more years living in agony.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some diseases are life threatening and can put a person in a no-living state. these situations are hard to bear for the ill person and for his family and relatives. only assisted suicide can make this easeKeypoint: The terminally ill would benefit from assisted suicide", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People need to die on their own as this would be almost like murder.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The end of life can be painful and humiliating, and we should allow people the right to decide when they are ready to end their own suffering.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be able to ask for help in ending their own life if they are living with an incurable disease.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Doctors take an oath to do no harm - assisting in suicide violates thisKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When people are suffering, it is unfair to force them to continue to do so. if someone can assist them in ending the suffering, they should be able to.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a criminal offense because if someone is in enough pain and is sane enough to decide, they should have that choice.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be made legal many people suffer with debilitating and painful illnesses and should be counselled and supported to make an informed choiceKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: To enable a very sick individual to end their life should be seen as an act of kindness not a criminal offence as it takes great strength of character to be that enabler in what is a very difficult time.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is too dangerous as if someone is weak and feeble a manipulative person could encourage them to kill themselves when they do not really want to.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: No doctor should take part in killing , it is their job to healKeypoint: Assisted suicide violates the doctor's role", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is a lot better than letting a person suffer until end of life.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be able to ask for help in ending their own life if they are living with an incurable disease.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be a criminal offence as if the person cannot make their own decisions and actions then it would be impossible to know if the person helping wasn't just murdering them.Keypoint: People who are ill do not have clear judgement and are in need of help", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be a criminal offence because pain makes people do some extreme things, but it shouldn't include death.Keypoint: People who are ill do not have clear judgement and are in need of help", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide could be misused by people who want their weaker partner to die. people could be encouraged to take their own life before they really want to.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People must be able to decide what to do or not with their lives therefore assisted suicide is an alternativeKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a criminal offense because when a person get gravely ill they should not have to keep on suffering.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is unethical how do we know that the person who is assisting the suicide hasnt got something to gain from the death of the other personKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People that are terminally ill should be able to choose whether they want to have to live suffering or whether they want to end the pain.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should have the right to die if they choose.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Helping someone to commit suicide is murder and should be criminalizedKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Being able to die with dignity should be a right. when someone thinks their time has come, they should be able to die comfortable without worrying if having their loved ones nearby would get them jail time.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sometimes people who are unable to end their own lives, are in so much pain and anguish that it is cruel to make them keep living, their loved ones need to be able to help them legally.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide allows for a person who is sick and fully understanding what is done to end their pain when no quality of life can be assuredKeypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is equivalent to murder and should be treated as such.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be free to help people out of their pain by helping them commit suicide without the fear of prosecutionKeypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: To assist a loved one to pass on and be relieved of suffering is a selfless act that should not be criminalised.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is no reason for dying people to suffer unnecessarilyKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is another type of murder.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a person who is dying anyway wants to end their life in a peaceful way then they should be able to do so.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If someone is suffering from an incurable disease and is in great pain, it can be humane to help end their suffering.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide shouldn't be a criminal offence because every human being should have the right to have someone assist them in passing should they determine they no longer wish to liveKeypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be a crime to prevent greedy individuals from killing their family member to get their money and propertyKeypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: To assist a loved one to pass on and be relieved of suffering is a selfless act that should not be criminalised.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: No other person should help you take your lifeKeypoint: People do not have the right to self-harm/harm others", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is no reason for dying people to suffer unnecessarilyKeypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be a criminal offence because the person is basically killing the other person.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Suicide has never been legal. it is still killing, even if one is taking ones own life.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It shouldn't be an offence because is someone is seriously ill and in pain they have the right to end their own life if they are suffering.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisting someone with suicide is equivalent to murder and that person has a moral obligation to report that persons intentions to authoritiesKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a crime. if someone is suffering on a daily basis from something that they are going to die from anyway, they should be allowed to die on their own terms.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If someone has an illness and is in constant pain, helping them end their misery is the humane thing to do and should be understood.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be a criminal offense because death is death, at the end of the day someone is dead and you had a hand in it.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is murder of another and should be considered a criminal offence.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a criminal offense since it should be a personal decision what a person wants for themselves. it could prevent months or years of pain for someone with no quality of life.Keypoint: The terminally ill would benefit from assisted suicide", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be allowed because it allows people with terminal illnesses to die with dignity before suffering a long and painful death.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is nothing but murder. you are giving a human the ability to legally kill another. this should be stopped. no person should be allowed to cause a death of another.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide involves murdering someone which is illegal and should be treated as such.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People who are suffering with terminal illnesses with no hope of cure and in immense pain should be allowed to end their suffering. it's safer and painless done in a doctor's care rather than their own devices.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People may easily be manipulated into being a victim of assisted suicide by relatives with alterior motivesKeypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a terminally ill patient does not have assisted suicide available they may turn to another more violent method of ending their own life.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People with terminal illnesses are going to die. by not allowing assisted suicide we are making these people suffer deeply which in inhumane.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There's the possibility that it could be used by those close to the person for financial gain or maliciously. you only have the word of the survivor that the person actually wanted to die.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide would save terminally i'll people pain and suffering.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be a criminal offence as it is another form of murderKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisting a suicide for medical reasons should not be considered a criminal offense because the person is making sound judgements based on someone else's suffering.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many people face a cruel and protracted period of suffering before their death so with compassion they should be helped therefore assisted suicide should not be a criminal offence.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisting a suicide for medical reasons should not be considered a criminal offense because the person is making sound judgements based on someone else's suffering.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide involves murdering someone which is illegal and should be treated as such.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There's the possibility that it could be used by those close to the person for financial gain or maliciously. you only have the word of the survivor that the person actually wanted to die.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People who are terminally ill with no hope of survival should be spared the pain and suffering of living.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This would protect someone who's judgement may be impairedKeypoint: People who are ill do not have clear judgement and are in need of help", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide would save terminally i'll people pain and suffering.Keypoint: The terminally ill would benefit from assisted suicide", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Allowing assisted suicide would enable greedy relatives to take advantage of ill relatives for their own financial gainKeypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Suicide should never be allowed and helping a person should be treated as murder. no person has the right to take a life. each person should be treated humanely and encouraged to live their natural life span.Keypoint: People do not have the right to self-harm/harm others", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be a criminal offense because death is death, at the end of the day someone is dead and you had a hand in it.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People who are suffering with terminal illnesses with no hope of cure and in immense pain should be allowed to end their suffering. it's safer and painless done in a doctor's care rather than their own devices.Keypoint: The terminally ill would benefit from assisted suicide", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide would save terminally i'll people pain and suffering.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be a criminal offence because it would be very easy to murder a vulnerable relative in order to get an inheritance.Keypoint: Assisted suicide should not be allowed because many times people can still get better", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be allowed to die with dignity if they choose to.Keypoint: The terminally ill would benefit from assisted suicide", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A person has the right to end their suffering and if somebody takes pity on them and chooses to help, that person should not be punished.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Asisted suicide can be abused by those who want to benefit from taking advantage of a sick or ill relative and thus should not be allowed.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is really just another word for murder or homicide,Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A person should have the right to die on their own termsKeypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A person should have the right to be able to choose if they want to live or dieKeypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A person should not be forced into having to live their lives suffering, when death is already enevitableKeypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be allowed in certain circumstances such as when a person is suffering from severe illnesses.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisting a suicide for medical reasons should not be considered a criminal offense because the person is making sound judgements based on someone else's suffering.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We cannot allow people to assist suicide because there is a fine line between assistance and murder and to have to differentiate is complex ground.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be a criminal offense because at the end of the day somebody is dead and you had a hand in it.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: For those with degenerative diseases, assisted suicide is often the only solace they haveKeypoint: The terminally ill would benefit from assisted suicide", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People who have no hope of living should have a choice to end their lifeKeypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should be a criminal offence because no one has a right to take another persons life or to help themKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A patient should be able to decide when they have had enough \"care\".Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Ending a life is unlawful regardless of the reason.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Ending a life is a crime no matter the reason.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is just murder by another name and it should be punished accordingly.Keypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People who are terminally ill and suffering greatly should have the right to end their own life if they so desire.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be free to help people out of their pain by helping them commit suicide without the fear of prosecutionKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: No one should be able to get away with assisting suicide. it is nothing more than glorified murder. assisting should be replaced by helping these people find a better way to cope with their lives.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A person should not be forced into having to live their lives suffering, when death is already enevitableKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Terminally ill patients who just don't want to continue suffering have a valid reason to contemplate suicide, and someone who wants to help ease their pain should not be punished.Keypoint: The terminally ill would benefit from assisted suicide", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is necessary in our modern world full of people dealing with pain and sorrowKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide would relieve much suffering by those with a terminal illness that is too much to bear.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Helping someone to commit suicide is murder and should be criminalizedKeypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be allowed to die with dignity if they choose to.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is really just another word for murder or homicide,Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some patients have the utmost suffering and must end it as soon as possibleKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People who have terminal illness or suffer from certain medical conditions should have the freedom to choose and if medical personnel helps them it shouldn't be treated as offence.Keypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Doctors take an oath to do no harm - assisting in suicide violates thisKeypoint: Assisted suicide violates the doctor's role", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The right to die is a personal choice and everyone has the right to make it happen if they truly wishKeypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should no be considered a criminal offence because a person could really be suffering and in pain and to let them suffer is heartless and inhumaneKeypoint: People should have the freedom to choose to end their life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Everyone should have the right to chose the direction they want to take, if someone is in unbearable pain with no quality of life then they should have the right to seek assistance.Keypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide helps terminally ill people end their sufferingKeypoint: Assisted suicide reduces suffering", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Ending a life is a crime no matter the reason.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is possible that this could be used as a murder in some cases.Keypoint: Assisted suicide is akin to killing someone", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nobody has the right to take a life.Keypoint: People do not have the right to self-harm/harm others", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide is a form of murder and should be treated as a crimeKeypoint: Assisted suicide allows people to solicit someone to die to their own benefit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Assisted suicide should not be a criminal offence as people with no quality of life should not have to suffer indefinitely and their trusted helper should not be a criminal for helping them.Keypoint: Assisted suicide gives dignity to the person that wants to commit it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - } - ] -} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/tasks/task1286_kpa_keypoint_matching_homeschooling_topic.json b/tasks/task1286_kpa_keypoint_matching_homeschooling_topic.json deleted file mode 100644 index bb1b211f3..000000000 --- a/tasks/task1286_kpa_keypoint_matching_homeschooling_topic.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2823 +0,0 @@ -{ - "Contributors": [ - "Arjun Ashok" - ], - "Source": [ - "ArgKP (https://github.com/IBM/KPA_2021_shared_task)" - ], - "Definition": "The input contains an argument and a keypoint on the topic \"Homeschooling should be banned\", separated by \"\".Your task is to answer if the keypoint matches the argument and summarizes exactly what the argument means, in the context of this topic.", - "Categories": [ - "Classification -> Verification -> Summary Verification", - "Text Comparison" - ], - "Domains": [ - "Reviews", - "Law", - "Dialogue" - ], - "Input_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Output_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Instruction_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Positive Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Parentz have a right to make educational choices for their kids.Keypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that parentz have a right to make educational choices for their kids." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should be banned because a lot of the time the parents are too stupid to teach and the kids don't learn what they should be learning and they cannot make it out into the real worldKeypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that homeschooling should be banned because a lot of the time the parents are too stupid to teach and the kids don't learn what they should be learning and they cannot make it out into the real world" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents doesn't have the skills to properly school their kid and should be left for the professionals so you the kid can be sure to have a good and properly educationKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that parents doesn't have the skills to properly school their kid and should be left for the professionals so you the kid can be sure to have a good and properly education" - } - ], - "Negative Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling tailors learning to specific children's educational and psychological needs.Keypoint: Homeschools can be personalized to the child's pace/needs", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that homeschooling tailors learning to specific children's educational and psychological needs." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should not be banned because parents have the right to educate their children with the curriculum of their choice and not having to conform to a set curriculum.Keypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that homeschooling should not be banned because parents have the right to educate their children with the curriculum of their choice and not having to conform to a set curriculum." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling shouldn't be banned because it is a great alternative to public school. parents have the right to make that choice and they get to teach the children what they believe they need to learn.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that homeschooling shouldn't be banned because it is a great alternative to public school. parents have the right to make that choice and they get to teach the children what they believe they need to learn." - } - ], - "Instances": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling absolutely should not be banned because parents have the freedom to raise their kids as they see fit. if they think they can do a better job teaching their children, they have every right to.Keypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It should be banned because there is no control of what is being teached at home and it could hinder the child's development not being able to socialise.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are of higher educational quality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children who are homeschooled may end up being lonely because they aren't socializing with school friends. there could also be the worry that they aren't getting a proper education.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is unregulated so a good education is not guaranteedKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sometimes the best teacher is a parent because they know how best a child will learnKeypoint: Parents will have more ability to pay-attention/educate their child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some parents provide an inferior education so the children don't learn to read or write sufficiently well enough to enable them to join the work force.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling provides children who cannot keep up in school a way to learn at their paceKeypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children can get more one on one assistance when they are homeschooled and can learn at their own pace.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents are usually not qualified to provide a suitable curriculum for their children. additionally, children are not exposed to the real world.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling isolates children from a social setting which would help a child learn social skills and interactions.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should continue to support homeschooling as all children have different learning styles and this gives another avenue for students to learn in an environment they are comfortable.Keypoint: Homeschools can be personalized to the child's pace/needs", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling doesn't allow the child to have the same social aspect that they would attain at a regular school.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should be banned because educational institutions still provide a better education.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling allows the child to get more direct instruction and can be completed at their speed and not someone else's.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children miss out on important social interaction with their peersKeypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling can provide more one on one attention and can allow the child to learn at their own speed.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should be banned as their result of homeschooling is a generation of children who do not have solid socialization skills to go out into the world in.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling isolates children from a social setting which would help a child learn social skills and interactions.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents are not trained, qualified teachers and kids need to learn to socialize with other kidsKeypoint: Mainstream schools are of higher educational quality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents are not trained, qualified teachers and kids need to learn to socialize with other kidsKeypoint: Parents are not qualified as teachers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some children can not succeed in a group setting such as an autistic child. by working at home without distractions school subjects can better be learnedKeypoint: Homeschools can be personalized to the child's pace/needs", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some parents provide an inferior education so the children don't learn to read or write sufficiently well enough to enable them to join the work force.Keypoint: Parents are not qualified as teachers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are concerns that the 'whole child' is put to a disadvantage as a result of homeschooling as meaningful interactions with peers become limited.Keypoint: Parents are not qualified as teachers", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling closes students off from peer to peer interactionKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Particularly for students with learning difficulties, mainstream schooling could be inappropriate.Keypoint: Homeschools can be personalized to the child's pace/needs", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sometimes the best teacher is a parent because they know how best a child will learnKeypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling allows for one on one teaching as well as allowing a student to learn in a safe environmentKeypoint: Parents will have more ability to pay-attention/educate their child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children need to be with other children to learn to be socialKeypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should be banned because parents are often ill equipped to teach their children properlyKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling does not educate children in the way they should be educated causing them to often be behind those of their own age.Keypoint: Parents are not qualified as teachers", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents are really no substitute to a qualified teacher and their ignorance at their inability to provide their child with a good education is harmful to the child for the rest of their lifeKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It shouldn't be because some children have difficulty at school, maybe due to anxiety and its good to be able to have the option to still learn but from home.Keypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling can be tailored to individual needs of children.Keypoint: Homeschools can be personalized to the child's pace/needs", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling has proven to be just as educational as traditional schools.Keypoint: Homeschools can be personalized to the child's pace/needs", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling allows for targeted education in a safe environment.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should be banned as all children should have the right to go to a school where they will learn with other children.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling causes stunted social skills in children, creating larger problems for them as adultsKeypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling programs use curricula similar to schools so that the kids will be just as prepared as students in regular schools. also, some kids are better at learning one-on-one rather than in a classroom.Keypoint: The home is a good learning environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling does not promote social interaction and therefore should be discontinued.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling can be appropriate with children, who have specific needs. for example, people with mental health or physical needs.Keypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children can get more one on one assistance when they are homeschooled and can learn at their own pace.Keypoint: Parents will have more ability to pay-attention/educate their child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should continue to support homeschooling as all children have different learning styles and this gives another avenue for students to learn in an environment they are comfortable.Keypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooled kids don't get the education they need and don't get to work on their social skillsKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling takes kids away from a social setting and ruins their social skillsKeypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should be allowed to give children who do not function in a large setting the ability for a solid education.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling deprives the child of learning social behaviors and norms.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Under the homeschooling system parents become much more exclusive mentors to a child, and this can be problematicKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children have a right to education and ignorant parents that think they are more qualified than they are should not have tyranny over that rightKeypoint: Parents are not qualified as teachers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many families are adopting their own curriculum and are leaving out important details. children's educations are being limited because their parents have limited education.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are of higher educational quality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is necessary for those with reduced mobility or those who suffer bullyingKeypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooled kids don't get the education they need and don't get to work on their social skillsKeypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If parents feel their local schools are not helping to achieve then they should have the right to try and do a better job.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents have the right to educate their children at home.Keypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling can be tailored to individual needs of children.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A parent knows best what is good for their kidKeypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should never be banned. with the amount of bullying and school shootings that happen it's very important that parents be allowed to home school their kids if they want.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is a good thing for those kids that have extra curricular activitiesKeypoint: Homeschools can be personalized to the child's pace/needs", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is the best way for children to have their specific needs metKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: To homeschool is in one way giving a child an immersive educational experience, but not giving them the social skills and cooperative skills they need throughout life, so should be banned.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many homeschool kids are smarter and learn more than kids in public school.Keypoint: The home is a good learning environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Home schooling isn't as good as regular schools because parents just are not as equipped as teachers are in educating their kids.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling can provide the child with a more comfortable environment. it can also help shield the child from all ills of society like bullying.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents are not teachers and have not been educated on teaching methodsKeypoint: Parents are not qualified as teachers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is often done by parents who do not have enough education themselves to provide an adequate one for their children.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling provides an opportunity to tailer the curriculum to the particular childs learning style. this may be particularly advantageous when individual learning needs require special consideration.Keypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is difficult to regulate and stops children from mixing with others which is important for social function in adult life.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are of higher educational quality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children with disabilities or mental illness will get as much patience as they need in home schoolKeypoint: Homeschools can be personalized to the child's pace/needs", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children who are bullied in school can benefit greatly from switching to a homeschool environment where the parents have more control over who their children socialize with.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents are usually not qualified to provide a suitable curriculum for their children. additionally, children are not exposed to the real world.Keypoint: Parents are not qualified as teachers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is not government regulated.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Families should have the continued option of homeschooling because bullying in schools and such exists.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling allows children to be taught in a comfortable sitting as well as benefit from one-on-one teaching and relieves the stress from such things as bullying and peer pressure.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents are not trained, qualified teachers and kids need to learn to socialize with other kidsKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to support homeschooling as not all children have the same learning style and may suffer if they are not offered an alternative way to learn.Keypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling eschews the normal standards adhered to in the school system and does the child a disservice in terms of education.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling isolates the children and prevents them from developing proper social relations.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling makes it difficult for children to socially intereact with their peers.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should not be banned because it is the right of parents to decide which kind of school is best for their children.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling eschews the normal standards adhered to in the school system and does the child a disservice in terms of education.Keypoint: Parents are not qualified as teachers", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The parents should be allowed to home school their kids if that's their choice.Keypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling can provide more one on one attention and can allow the child to learn at their own speed.Keypoint: Homeschools can be personalized to the child's pace/needs", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooled kids don't get the education they need and don't get to work on their social skillsKeypoint: Mainstream schools are of higher educational quality", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: With all the violence going on in schools, i think parents have a right to homeschooling their children if they want toKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents are free to educate their children how they see fitKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling stops children interacting with others their own age, delaying the development of crucial social skills.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling can lead to a better learning outcome for many children who struggle in the traditional classroom.Keypoint: The home is a good learning environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents should have the freedom to raise their children the way the wish to.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children do not get the social interaction from kids their own age if homeschooled.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Most homeschooled students are not learning the appropriate subjects needed to further their education.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should be banned because some homeschool parents are not capable of actually teaching their kids anything.Keypoint: Parents are not qualified as teachers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling keeps children from socializing and learning to work with other people.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children need an active environment with different types of people rather than always being at homeKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is very helpful to children who have been bulliedKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There's no guarantee that homeschooled children will receive a good education.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling allows parents to emphasis topics that are important and necessary instead of the fluf that is added by the school systems.Keypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents and other home schoolers are not as equipped as regular teachers and schools to educate students.Keypoint: Parents are not qualified as teachers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling does not educate children in the way they should be educated causing them to often be behind those of their own age.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are of higher educational quality", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should be banned as their result of homeschooling is a generation of children who do not have solid socialization skills to go out into the world in.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling does not give kids a way to meet other kids, their social lives are nonexistent and during those ages they are developing and need to have social interaction with kids their age.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children have a right to education and ignorant parents that think they are more qualified than they are should not have tyranny over that rightKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Particularly for students with learning difficulties, mainstream schooling could be inappropriate.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling not only allows a parent to choose what the child is learning about, but it also keeps the children in a familiar, safe environment.Keypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Schools are able to provide a good education in almost every area. by homeschooling parents limit the types of knowledge available. schools provide a socialization children need in the real worldKeypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This is a free country, people have the right to homeschool their childrenKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling prevents children from socializing with other children which can cause problems for them in the future.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should not be banned, its a great way to learn one to one especially for children with learning difficultiesKeypoint: Homeschools can be personalized to the child's pace/needs", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling provides opportunities for a safe environment as well as for children with special needs that are not properly met in a school setting.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling allows for one on one teaching as well as allowing a student to learn in a safe environmentKeypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling needs to be banned as it isolated the children and they do not learn how to function if a diverse world.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should be banned because it's too hard to make sure that students are following set curriculums and getting the full education that they need.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooled children do much better in standardized testingKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling means that the children involved are deprived of regular social contact with others of their own ageKeypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling removes bullying from a childs life and can help a child focus on studies.Keypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Public schools are dangerous these days and homeschooling allows parents to teach their children while keeping them safe at the same time.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling allows a cirriculum that caters to a child's specific needs and saves the state money.Keypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling does not provide communication skills children needKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Schools nowadays are not really teaching something new grow older people don't know. since school environment is getting dangerous for children, homeschooling should be allowedKeypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents are free to educate their children how they see fitKeypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling allows for one on one teaching as well as allowing a student to learn in a safe environmentKeypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some students with special needs will need more personalized attention that only homeschooling can provide.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents have the right to choose how their child should be educated and schools are not always the best environment so the option to homeschool should remain.Keypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling prevents a child from socialising with his or her own age group, and can cause isolation and loneliness.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should not be banned, its a great way to learn one to one especially for children with learning difficultiesKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is advantageous for a particular subset of children; for example if they have additional needs or if they have been bullied in main stream school.Keypoint: Homeschools can be personalized to the child's pace/needs", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents have the right to choose how their child should be educated and schools are not always the best environment so the option to homeschool should remain.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homes schooled children get a much better adult:child ratio. they can take advantage of weather current events etc by being flexible in their curriculum. there is also the absence of peer pressureKeypoint: Parents will have more ability to pay-attention/educate their child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschool students don't gain the social skills they need while growing up.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The kids do not get the proper socialization and may have more trouble moving on to college educationally and socially.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is sometimes required for children with learning disabilitiesKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Education at home could represent a risk since it is not regulatedKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling helps children by providing one on one attention when they need extra help.Keypoint: Parents will have more ability to pay-attention/educate their child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is advantageous for a particular subset of children; for example if they have additional needs or if they have been bullied in main stream school.Keypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Home schooling isn't as good as regular schools because parents just are not as equipped as teachers are in educating their kids.Keypoint: Parents are not qualified as teachers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should not be banned because some kids get picked on and a safe home setting is best place to learn.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Public schools are dangerous these days and homeschooling allows parents to teach their children while keeping them safe at the same time.Keypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling can lead to a better learning outcome for many children who struggle in the traditional classroom.Keypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should be banned because an important part of a child's education is social learning and one cannot grow socially without being around their peers.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should be banned because it can result in children not receiving a standard education, missing important subjects, social skills and qualifications.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should continue to support homeschooling as it gives children another form of education when other forms do not work.Keypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooled children do much better in standardized testingKeypoint: The home is a good learning environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some parents don't offer their children a good education when they homeschool and therefore their child is disadvantaged later on in life.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It stops kids integrating with other kidsKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling means that the children involved are deprived of regular social contact with others of their own ageKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents have the right to determine their childrens' upbringing.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children do not get the social interaction from kids their own age if homeschooled.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is little oversight into how the parents teach their children & it should be bannedKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It should be banned because there is no control of what is being teached at home and it could hinder the child's development not being able to socialise.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some children don't perform well in a public school setting, not every child learns the same ways. it is important to have alternatives to give the child the best chance of success when public school fails him.Keypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling does not educate children in the way they should be educated causing them to often be behind those of their own age.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooled kids get a good education and it is the parents right to school them how they see fitKeypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a school is not providing a good education parents should be allowed to take overKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Schools are getting dangerous. an education at home, personalized and geared toward the child will benefit himKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children who homeschool have surpassed their public school peers in standardized testing by an overall 10% better performance.Keypoint: The home is a good learning environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some children don't perform well in a public school setting, not every child learns the same ways. it is important to have alternatives to give the child the best chance of success when public school fails him.Keypoint: Homeschools can be personalized to the child's pace/needs", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should be banned because a lazy parent cannot help a child grow fundamentally.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling strips children of necessary socializationKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling causes a child to not get the proper education they need due to parents having control over what they learn and what they don'tKeypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling has proven to be just as educational as traditional schools.Keypoint: The home is a good learning environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some children can't adjust to a regular school and homeschooling means they can still get an education.Keypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling allows for targeted education in a safe environment.Keypoint: The home is a good learning environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is a right for parents that cannot be taken away. they have the right to choose to school their children as they see fitKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling deprives the child of learning social behaviors and norms.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is an inadequate and limited form of teaching children educational materials. homeschooling denies children the ability to learn with peers and learn valuable social interaction skills.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling helps children by providing one on one attention when they need extra help.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children can not learn to interact with their peers when taught at homeKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling closes kids off from creating relationships with others their ageKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a child gets a good education why does it matter if that is at home or in a school. some children have needs that are not always met by a school such as learning difficulties, autism and anxietyKeypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Home schooling provides a safe place to learn without school shooting and bullying dangersKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should be banned because a lazy parent cannot help a child grow fundamentally.Keypoint: Parents are not qualified as teachers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Education at home could represent a risk since it is not regulatedKeypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is very helpful to children who have been bulliedKeypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling prevents the child from interacting with others in a safe school environmentKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: To homeschool is in one way giving a child an immersive educational experience, but not giving them the social skills and cooperative skills they need throughout life, so should be banned.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is difficult to regulate and stops children from mixing with others which is important for social function in adult life.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some children can not succeed in a group setting such as an autistic child. by working at home without distractions school subjects can better be learnedKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling strips children of necessary socializationKeypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents are really no substitute to a qualified teacher and their ignorance at their inability to provide their child with a good education is harmful to the child for the rest of their lifeKeypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is a good thing for those kids that have extra curricular activitiesKeypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling does not give children social interaction.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The kids do not get the proper socialization and may have more trouble moving on to college educationally and socially.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is not well regulated and overseen by independent bodiesKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling does not provide communication skills children needKeypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Home schooling is a good alternative for many. it is economical, safe and and a better environment for some children. parents have a right to choose what is best for their child.Keypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should be banned because it can result in children not receiving a standard education, missing important subjects, social skills and qualifications.Keypoint: Parents are not qualified as teachers", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling shouldn't be banned because not everyone is suitable for school, for example those with autism/aspergersKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling can lead to children not forming the social bonds with their peers which they should.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling strips kids of the necessary socialization they have in their adolescence at schoolKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling lets kids learn on their own level and helps kids improve their learning skillsKeypoint: Homeschools can be personalized to the child's pace/needs", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling programs use curricula similar to schools so that the kids will be just as prepared as students in regular schools. also, some kids are better at learning one-on-one rather than in a classroom.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling shouldn't be banned because it is a great alternative to public school. parents have the right to make that choice and they get to teach the children what they believe they need to learn.Keypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is the best way for children to have their specific needs metKeypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children need a well rounded education which includes socializing with their peers. they need to learn the cooperation and negotiating skills essential for the world at largeKeypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling does not allow the child or children to socialize with others of their own age.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is necessary for those with reduced mobility or those who suffer bullyingKeypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling prevent children to socialize and confront with others, therefore it should be banned.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children miss out on important social interaction with their peersKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents do not have to divide their time between a classroom full of children and can cater to the needs of their own childKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If parents feel their local schools are not helping to achieve then they should have the right to try and do a better job.Keypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is often done by parents who do not have enough education themselves to provide an adequate one for their children.Keypoint: Parents are not qualified as teachers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is not well regulated and overseen by independent bodiesKeypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents have the right to educate their children at home.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: With all the violence going on in schools, i think parents have a right to homeschooling their children if they want toKeypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling eschews the normal standards adhered to in the school system and does the child a disservice in terms of education.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are of higher educational quality", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is not enough regulation around homeschooling or the people to ensure the children are getting the required and appropriate education.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooled children lack essentials education and social cohesion schooled children are taught. this impede children proper developmentKeypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should be banned because educational institutions still provide a better education.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are of higher educational quality", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some children have no choice but to be homeschooled. if they learn best in that environment, it wouldn't be fair to take that away from them.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling provides opportunities for a safe environment as well as for children with special needs that are not properly met in a school setting.Keypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling can be useful when a child is being bullied in school and needs protection from their bullies.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should be banned because a lot of the time the parents are too stupid to teach and the kids don't learn what they should be learning and they cannot make it out into the real worldKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents should have the freedom to raise their children the way the wish to.Keypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some children do not adapt well to the school environment and need the one on one support that homeschooling can provideKeypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parentz have a right to make educational choices for their kids.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents should determine how their children sill be taught and use homeschooling if it meets their needs. government can determine the educational requirements not the teaching method.Keypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is unregulated and unsupervised. many homeschoolers indoctrinate their children in bizarre religious beliefs and to not believe in science. this is dangerous and must be stopped.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should be banned as all children should have the right to go to a school where they will learn with other children.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling does not provide necessary socialization skills needed in everyday life as well as cooperation among peers.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children have a right to education and ignorant parents that think they are more qualified than they are should not have tyranny over that rightKeypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling closes students off from peer to peer interactionKeypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling can lead to a better learning outcome for many children who struggle in the traditional classroom.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling children creates children that have no social skills and won't be able to function in a workplace with other people.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is sometimes the only option for distressed or troublesome children who cannot adapt to the normal school environment.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many children prosper from homeschooling.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling allows a cirriculum that caters to a child's specific needs and saves the state money.Keypoint: Homeschools can be personalized to the child's pace/needs", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It stops kids integrating with other kidsKeypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooled kids don't get the education they need and don't get to work on their social skillsKeypoint: Parents are not qualified as teachers", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents have an absolute choice to determine how their children should be educatedKeypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents should have the right to choose how to educate their childrenKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Schools are getting dangerous. an education at home, personalized and geared toward the child will benefit himKeypoint: Homeschools can be personalized to the child's pace/needs", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooled students do not learn necessary social skillsKeypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling can put children at a disadvantage if their parents are not intelligent enough to provide a good education.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should not be banned because some kids get picked on and a safe home setting is best place to learn.Keypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is a right for parents that cannot be taken away. they have the right to choose to school their children as they see fitKeypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is good for children that require special one on one learning.Keypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling prevent children to socialize and confront with others, therefore it should be banned.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents should determine how their children sill be taught and use homeschooling if it meets their needs. government can determine the educational requirements not the teaching method.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling provides an opportunity to tailer the curriculum to the particular childs learning style. this may be particularly advantageous when individual learning needs require special consideration.Keypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should be banned because some homeschool parents are not capable of actually teaching their kids anything.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A parent knows best what is good for their kidKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is advantageous for a particular subset of children; for example if they have additional needs or if they have been bullied in main stream school.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should not be banned because some children who have been bullied need the safety of home.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should have a say in what their children are taught.Keypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some parents don't offer their children a good education when they homeschool and therefore their child is disadvantaged later on in life.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling stops children interacting with others their own age, delaying the development of crucial social skills.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is difficult to regulate and stops children from mixing with others which is important for social function in adult life.Keypoint: Parents are not qualified as teachers", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is not regulated and nobody can be sure that the kids have learned anything.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is not regulated enough.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some children are better suited to the homeschool environment and learn better that way.Keypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should will allowed to continue as its important to allow parents to allow their child to be educated at home if they feel that its the best option for their child.Keypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is sometimes required for children with learning disabilitiesKeypoint: Homeschools can be personalized to the child's pace/needs", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling a child denies them valuable lifeskills, particularly interaction with their own age group and all experiences stemming from this.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Home schooling provides a safe place to learn without school shooting and bullying dangersKeypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling helps kids learn better in an environment where they're comfortable.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is not government regulated.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children can get more one on one assistance when they are homeschooled and can learn at their own pace.Keypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling robs children of very valuable socialization.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents are really no substitute to a qualified teacher and their ignorance at their inability to provide their child with a good education is harmful to the child for the rest of their lifeKeypoint: Parents are not qualified as teachers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling can lead to a better learning outcome for many children who struggle in the traditional classroom.Keypoint: Parents will have more ability to pay-attention/educate their child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling can put children at a disadvantage if their parents are not intelligent enough to provide a good education.Keypoint: Parents are not qualified as teachers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is unregulated so a good education is not guaranteedKeypoint: Parents are not qualified as teachers", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is difficult to regulate and stops children from mixing with others which is important for social function in adult life.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling not only allows a parent to choose what the child is learning about, but it also keeps the children in a familiar, safe environment.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling gives kids the opportunity to learn at their own pace which helps them excel in areas they may have failed at in public school.Keypoint: Homeschools can be personalized to the child's pace/needs", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some children don't perform well in a public school setting, not every child learns the same ways. it is important to have alternatives to give the child the best chance of success when public school fails him.Keypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children who are homeschooled may end up being lonely because they aren't socializing with school friends. there could also be the worry that they aren't getting a proper education.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents know what is best for their children. some children do better learning in a home environment, as opposed to a institutional environmentKeypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is an excellent alternative for children who are unable to attend normal schools for either emotional or psychological reasons.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It should be banned because there is no control of what is being teached at home and it could hinder the child's development not being able to socialise.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is not regulated enough.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents are not trained, qualified teachers and kids need to learn to socialize with other kidsKeypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should not be banned because there is a lot of crime in the schools and if the parents want to teach their children they should have the right toKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling lets kids learn on their own level and helps kids improve their learning skillsKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is a matter of parental choice and if the parents think they can educate their child better than sending them to school, it should be their right.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should will allowed to continue as its important to allow parents to allow their child to be educated at home if they feel that its the best option for their child.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents and other home schoolers are not as equipped as regular teachers and schools to educate students.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should not be banned because parents have the right to educate their children with the curriculum of their choice and not having to conform to a set curriculum.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should be supportive by any means because will help kids to be successful at school and tomorrow on their life.Keypoint: The home is a good learning environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Families should have the continued option of homeschooling because bullying in schools and such exists.Keypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children who homeschool have surpassed their public school peers in standardized testing by an overall 10% better performance.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling does not give children social interaction.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should be banned as the quality of education received at home is considerably less than what you would receive at a school.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is sometimes the only option for distressed or troublesome children who cannot adapt to the normal school environment.Keypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A parent knows their child better than anyone else and can personalize their teaching to that childs personalityKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling needs to be banned as it isolated the children and they do not learn how to function if a diverse world.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is not regulated so students could miss out on important lessons.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should not be banned as typically the students are more self motivated and higher achievers by being able to work at their own pace and on their own interests.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should not be banned because there is so much crime in the schools that the parents have a right to keep their kids home and teach themKeypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling can provide the child with a more comfortable environment. it can also help shield the child from all ills of society like bullying.Keypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some children can't adjust to a regular school and homeschooling means they can still get an education.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling can lead to children not forming the social bonds with their peers which they should.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is impossible to ensure that homeschooled children are being taught properlyKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling gives kids the opportunity to learn at their own pace which helps them excel in areas they may have failed at in public school.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling not only allows a parent to choose what the child is learning about, but it also keeps the children in a familiar, safe environment.Keypoint: The home is a good learning environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children need to be with other children to learn to be socialKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should be banned because it can result in children not receiving a standard education, missing important subjects, social skills and qualifications.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling robs children of very valuable socialization.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many children prosper from homeschooling.Keypoint: The home is a good learning environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is an inadequate and limited form of teaching children educational materials. homeschooling denies children the ability to learn with peers and learn valuable social interaction skills.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should be banned because an important part of a child's education is social learning and one cannot grow socially without being around their peers.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Most homeschooled students are not learning the appropriate subjects needed to further their education.Keypoint: Parents are not qualified as teachers", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should have the right to choose how they want to do schoolingKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should be supportive by any means because will help kids to be successful at school and tomorrow on their life.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This is a free country, people have the right to homeschool their childrenKeypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling allows parents to emphasis topics that are important and necessary instead of the fluf that is added by the school systems.Keypoint: Parents will have more ability to pay-attention/educate their child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is a good option for children who are bullied, giving them a safe place to learnKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling allows parents to teach using methods that are best suited to their child's way of learningKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should not be banned because some children who have been bullied need the safety of home.Keypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling can be useful when a child is being bullied in school and needs protection from their bullies.Keypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should not be banned because it is a great way of educating children especially those with special medical attentionKeypoint: Homeschools can be personalized to the child's pace/needs", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling can be appropriate with children, who have specific needs. for example, people with mental health or physical needs.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooled students do not learn necessary social skillsKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homes schooled children get a much better adult:child ratio. they can take advantage of weather current events etc by being flexible in their curriculum. there is also the absence of peer pressureKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling cannot provide the quality of education that real teachers and a real school can provide.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is often done to keep children from encountering a diverse array of viewpoints which may differ from the beliefs of the homeschooling parents. this damages a child's social development.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is not the best way to learn.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should have the right to choose how they want to do schoolingKeypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents have the right to determine their childrens' upbringing.Keypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Schools are usually crowded and full of distractions, homeschooling affords children the opportunity to study with more concentration on their booksKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling prevents children from gaining important social skillsKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling absolutely should not be banned because parents have the freedom to raise their kids as they see fit. if they think they can do a better job teaching their children, they have every right to.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling deprives children of essential social interaction with their peers.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling provides an opportunity to tailer the curriculum to the particular childs learning style. this may be particularly advantageous when individual learning needs require special consideration.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some children have no choice but to be homeschooled. if they learn best in that environment, it wouldn't be fair to take that away from them.Keypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling tends to isolate children and not provide them with necessary social supports.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is a way for the child to still learn if they are having problems in a public setting whether its bullying or poor learning skills it can help the child improve and keep them safeKeypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should be banned as the quality of education received at home is considerably less than what you would receive at a school.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are of higher educational quality", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should have a say in what their children are taught.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should be banned because sometimes the parents aren't smart enough to teach their kidsKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some parents don't offer their children a good education when they homeschool and therefore their child is disadvantaged later on in life.Keypoint: Parents are not qualified as teachers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling doesn't allow the child to have the same social aspect that they would attain at a regular school.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling has a curriculum that is developed largely resembling that of a normal school's curriculum, and sometimes, students learn better in a more intimate setting.Keypoint: Homeschools can be personalized to the child's pace/needs", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling allows parents to teach using methods that are best suited to their child's way of learningKeypoint: Homeschools can be personalized to the child's pace/needs", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling does not promote social interaction and therefore should be discontinued.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children can not learn to interact with their peers when taught at homeKeypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is advantageous for a particular subset of children; for example if they have additional needs or if they have been bullied in main stream school.Keypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling causes a decline in education.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are of higher educational quality", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Not every parent is capable of adequately educating their child. parents don't have the knowledge, skills and training to properly educate, this leads to children being unsuccessful in life.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling tailors learning to specific children's educational and psychological needs.Keypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If parents feel they are best placed to educate their kids, they should be allowed toKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling may be beneficial in certain situations. such as for children who are being bullied.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling keeps children from learning to work in a groupKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is a way for the child to still learn if they are having problems in a public setting whether its bullying or poor learning skills it can help the child improve and keep them safeKeypoint: Parents will have more ability to pay-attention/educate their child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents should have the right to choose how to educate their childrenKeypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should be banned because parents are often ill equipped to teach their children properlyKeypoint: Parents are not qualified as teachers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooled children lack essentials education and social cohesion schooled children are taught. this impede children proper developmentKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling allows for one on one teaching as well as allowing a student to learn in a safe environmentKeypoint: The home is a good learning environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many families are adopting their own curriculum and are leaving out important details. children's educations are being limited because their parents have limited education.Keypoint: Parents are not qualified as teachers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling provides an opportunity to tailer the curriculum to the particular childs learning style. this may be particularly advantageous when individual learning needs require special consideration.Keypoint: Homeschools can be personalized to the child's pace/needs", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It should be banned because there is no control of what is being teached at home and it could hinder the child's development not being able to socialise.Keypoint: Parents are not qualified as teachers", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should not be banned because there is a lot of crime in the schools and if the parents want to teach their children they should have the right toKeypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is not the best way to learn.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are of higher educational quality", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling doesnt get children enough interaction with people so they are more likely to be social outcastsKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling children creates children that have no social skills and won't be able to function in a workplace with other people.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents do not have to divide their time between a classroom full of children and can cater to the needs of their own childKeypoint: Parents will have more ability to pay-attention/educate their child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some children do not adapt well to the school environment and need the one on one support that homeschooling can provideKeypoint: Homeschools can be personalized to the child's pace/needs", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling prevents children from socializing with other children which can cause problems for them in the future.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children need a well rounded education which includes socializing with their peers. they need to learn the cooperation and negotiating skills essential for the world at largeKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents are usually not qualified to provide a suitable curriculum for their children. additionally, children are not exposed to the real world.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are of higher educational quality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children who are homeschooled may end up being lonely because they aren't socializing with school friends. there could also be the worry that they aren't getting a proper education.Keypoint: Parents are not qualified as teachers", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If parents feel they are best placed to educate their kids, they should be allowed toKeypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should be allowed to give children who do not function in a large setting the ability for a solid education.Keypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling provides children who cannot keep up in school a way to learn at their paceKeypoint: Homeschools can be personalized to the child's pace/needs", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is not regulated and nobody can be sure that the kids have learned anything.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling keeps children from learning to work in a groupKeypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling takes kids away from a social setting and ruins their social skillsKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is not regulated so students could miss out on important lessons.Keypoint: Parents are not qualified as teachers", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Home schooling isn't as good as regular schools because parents just are not as equipped as teachers are in educating their kids.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is unfair to make decisions on a parents behalf in terms of what would be best for their child's educationKeypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling a child denies them valuable lifeskills, particularly interaction with their own age group and all experiences stemming from this.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is necessary for those with reduced mobility or those who suffer bullyingKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A parent knows their child better than anyone else and can personalize their teaching to that childs personalityKeypoint: Homeschools can be personalized to the child's pace/needs", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should be banned because the children will be kept at home and no social with other children and the children very likely in an abusive situation to where nobody knows about itKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling removes bullying from a childs life and can help a child focus on studies.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling allows the child to get more direct instruction and can be completed at their speed and not someone else's.Keypoint: Homeschools can be personalized to the child's pace/needs", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling doesnt get children enough interaction with people so they are more likely to be social outcastsKeypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is not enough regulation around homeschooling or the people to ensure the children are getting the required and appropriate education.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some children are better suited to the homeschool environment and learn better that way.Keypoint: Homeschools can be personalized to the child's pace/needs", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling closes kids off from creating relationships with others their ageKeypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Schools nowadays are not really teaching something new grow older people don't know. since school environment is getting dangerous for children, homeschooling should be allowedKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should not be banned because there is so much crime in the schools that the parents have a right to keep their kids home and teach themKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should be banned because the children will be kept at home and no social with other children and the children very likely in an abusive situation to where nobody knows about itKeypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should be banned because it's too hard to make sure that students are following set curriculums and getting the full education that they need.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Schools are able to provide a good education in almost every area. by homeschooling parents limit the types of knowledge available. schools provide a socialization children need in the real worldKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling does not give kids a way to meet other kids, their social lives are nonexistent and during those ages they are developing and need to have social interaction with kids their age.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling helps kids learn better in an environment where they're comfortable.Keypoint: The home is a good learning environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling does not allow the child or children to socialize with others of their own age.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents know what is best for their children. some children do better learning in a home environment, as opposed to a institutional environmentKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling makes it difficult for children to socially intereact with their peers.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling allows children to be taught in a comfortable sitting as well as benefit from one-on-one teaching and relieves the stress from such things as bullying and peer pressure.Keypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children who are bullied in school can benefit greatly from switching to a homeschool environment where the parents have more control over who their children socialize with.Keypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling deprives children of essential social interaction with their peers.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some children don't perform well in a public school setting, not every child learns the same ways. it is important to have alternatives to give the child the best chance of success when public school fails him.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is not regulated so students could miss out on important lessons.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children with disabilities or mental illness will get as much patience as they need in home schoolKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children need an active environment with different types of people rather than always being at homeKeypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should not be banned because it is the right of parents to decide which kind of school is best for their children.Keypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is an excellent alternative for children who are unable to attend normal schools for either emotional or psychological reasons.Keypoint: Homeschools can be personalized to the child's pace/needs", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents have an absolute choice to determine how their children should be educatedKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Schools are usually crowded and full of distractions, homeschooling affords children the opportunity to study with more concentration on their booksKeypoint: The home is a good learning environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children can get more one on one assistance when they are homeschooled and can learn at their own pace.Keypoint: Homeschools can be personalized to the child's pace/needs", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should continue to support homeschooling as it gives children another form of education when other forms do not work.Keypoint: Homeschools can be personalized to the child's pace/needs", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Most homeschooled students are not learning the appropriate subjects needed to further their education.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are of higher educational quality", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The parents should be allowed to home school their kids if that's their choice.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling cannot provide the quality of education that real teachers and a real school can provide.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should not be banned as typically the students are more self motivated and higher achievers by being able to work at their own pace and on their own interests.Keypoint: Homeschools can be personalized to the child's pace/needs", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling causes a decline in education.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some students with special needs will need more personalized attention that only homeschooling can provide.Keypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is impossible to ensure that homeschooled children are being taught properlyKeypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to support homeschooling as not all children have the same learning style and may suffer if they are not offered an alternative way to learn.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling isolates the children and prevents them from developing proper social relations.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling allows for one on one teaching as well as allowing a student to learn in a safe environmentKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Under the homeschooling system parents become much more exclusive mentors to a child, and this can be problematicKeypoint: Parents are not qualified as teachers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should not be banned because it is a great way of educating children especially those with special medical attentionKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should never be banned. with the amount of bullying and school shootings that happen it's very important that parents be allowed to home school their kids if they want.Keypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is unregulated and unsupervised. many homeschoolers indoctrinate their children in bizarre religious beliefs and to not believe in science. this is dangerous and must be stopped.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling prevents children from gaining important social skillsKeypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooled kids get a good education and it is the parents right to school them how they see fitKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is a way for the child to still learn if they are having problems in a public setting whether its bullying or poor learning skills it can help the child improve and keep them safeKeypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling can put children at a disadvantage if their parents are not intelligent enough to provide a good education.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sometimes the best teacher is a parent because they know how best a child will learnKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a child gets a good education why does it matter if that is at home or in a school. some children have needs that are not always met by a school such as learning difficulties, autism and anxietyKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is little oversight into how the parents teach their children & it should be bannedKeypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The kids do not get the proper socialization and may have more trouble moving on to college educationally and socially.Keypoint: Parents are not qualified as teachers", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling keeps children from socializing and learning to work with other people.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should be banned because a lot of the time the parents are too stupid to teach and the kids don't learn what they should be learning and they cannot make it out into the real worldKeypoint: Parents are not qualified as teachers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents are not teachers and have not been educated on teaching methodsKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling causes stunted social skills in children, creating larger problems for them as adultsKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is unregulated so a good education is not guaranteedKeypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling tends to isolate children and not provide them with necessary social supports.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is an inadequate and limited form of teaching children educational materials. homeschooling denies children the ability to learn with peers and learn valuable social interaction skills.Keypoint: Parents are not qualified as teachers", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are concerns that the 'whole child' is put to a disadvantage as a result of homeschooling as meaningful interactions with peers become limited.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is unfair to make decisions on a parents behalf in terms of what would be best for their child's educationKeypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should be banned because the children do not get the societal interaction they need to succeed outside the homeKeypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Home schooling is a good alternative for many. it is economical, safe and and a better environment for some children. parents have a right to choose what is best for their child.Keypoint: Homeschools can be personalized to the child's pace/needs", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling prevents the child from interacting with others in a safe school environmentKeypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling cannot provide the quality of education that real teachers and a real school can provide.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are of higher educational quality", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are concerns that the 'whole child' is put to a disadvantage as a result of homeschooling as meaningful interactions with peers become limited.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling may be beneficial in certain situations. such as for children who are being bullied.Keypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling has a curriculum that is developed largely resembling that of a normal school's curriculum, and sometimes, students learn better in a more intimate setting.Keypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling shouldn't be banned because not everyone is suitable for school, for example those with autism/aspergersKeypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling does not provide necessary socialization skills needed in everyday life as well as cooperation among peers.Keypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Not every parent is capable of adequately educating their child. parents don't have the knowledge, skills and training to properly educate, this leads to children being unsuccessful in life.Keypoint: Parents are not qualified as teachers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooled children lack essentials education and social cohesion schooled children are taught. this impede children proper developmentKeypoint: Parents are not qualified as teachers", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling prevents a child from socialising with his or her own age group, and can cause isolation and loneliness.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling can lead to a better learning outcome for many children who struggle in the traditional classroom.Keypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a school is not providing a good education parents should be allowed to take overKeypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It shouldn't be because some children have difficulty at school, maybe due to anxiety and its good to be able to have the option to still learn but from home.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents doesn't have the skills to properly school their kid and should be left for the professionals so you the kid can be sure to have a good and properly educationKeypoint: Parents are not qualified as teachers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many families are adopting their own curriculum and are leaving out important details. children's educations are being limited because their parents have limited education.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is a good option for children who are bullied, giving them a safe place to learnKeypoint: Mainstream schools have a lot of violence/bullying", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is a matter of parental choice and if the parents think they can educate their child better than sending them to school, it should be their right.Keypoint: Parents should be permitted to choose the education of their children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should be banned because sometimes the parents aren't smart enough to teach their kidsKeypoint: Parents are not qualified as teachers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is necessary for those with reduced mobility or those who suffer bullyingKeypoint: Homeschools can be personalized to the child's pace/needs", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is good for children that require special one on one learning.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling is often done to keep children from encountering a diverse array of viewpoints which may differ from the beliefs of the homeschooling parents. this damages a child's social development.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschool students don't gain the social skills they need while growing up.Keypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling allows parents to emphasis topics that are important and necessary instead of the fluf that is added by the school systems.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many homeschool kids are smarter and learn more than kids in public school.Keypoint: Homeschooling is often the best option for catering for the needs of exceptional/religious/ill/disabled students.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling strips kids of the necessary socialization they have in their adolescence at schoolKeypoint: Mainstream schools are essential to develop social skills", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Homeschooling should be banned because the children do not get the societal interaction they need to succeed outside the homeKeypoint: Homeschools cannot be regulated/standardized", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - } - ] -} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/tasks/task1287_kpa_keypoint_matching_marriage_topic.json b/tasks/task1287_kpa_keypoint_matching_marriage_topic.json deleted file mode 100644 index f0b96a813..000000000 --- a/tasks/task1287_kpa_keypoint_matching_marriage_topic.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,1670 +0,0 @@ -{ - "Contributors": [ - "Arjun Ashok" - ], - "Source": [ - "ArgKP (https://github.com/IBM/KPA_2021_shared_task)" - ], - "Definition": "The input contains an argument and a keypoint on the topic \"We should abandon marriage\", separated by \"\".Your task is to answer if the keypoint matches the argument and summarizes exactly what the argument means, in the context of this topic.", - "Categories": [ - "Classification -> Verification -> Summary Verification", - "Text Comparison" - ], - "Domains": [ - "Reviews", - "Dialogue" - ], - "Input_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Output_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Instruction_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Positive Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: We should abandon marriage since very few people marry these days and most that do end up in divorce.Keypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that we should abandon marriage since very few people marry these days and most that do end up in divorce." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abandon marriage because a lot of people are living together without being married so it's a waste to have marriages nowadaysKeypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that we should abandon marriage because a lot of people are living together without being married so it's a waste to have marriages nowadays" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Studies show that people who are married are happier and healthier than those who are notKeypoint: Marriage makes people happy", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that studies show that people who are married are happier and healthier than those who are not" - } - ], - "Negative Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: With divorce rates up so high, we should abandon marriage as an archaic and broken tradition.Keypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that with divorce rates up so high, we should abandon marriage as an archaic and broken tradition." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage has important religious groundings and we should not forbid people from following and adhering to their faith.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that marriage has important religious groundings and we should not forbid people from following and adhering to their faith." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage provides a stable and secure home for the children and should not be abandoned.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that marriage provides a stable and secure home for the children and should not be abandoned." - } - ], - "Instances": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an expression of love, and the gravity of it encourages couples to persevere with their relationship through difficult periods.Keypoint: Marriage provides important financial benefits", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is no longer necessary to obtain the benefits that have traditionally been associated with itKeypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage between two people creates a committed union forming the basis of a strong and secure union that is a safe setting to nurture children. it is a statement to the world of a bond between two peoples.Keypoint: Marriage makes people happy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is a legal relationship so you can claim certain benefits and get inheritance when your loved ones dies.Keypoint: Marriage provides important financial benefits", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is the law of god and very moral.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage provides stability and a commitment between people which strengthens relationships and to abandon it would be to turn out backs on something good.Keypoint: Marriage makes the couple closer", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriages are no longer lasting at the same rate they have been, so it should be avoided.Keypoint: Marriages are unstable", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is no need for marriage in this society. too many marriages end in divorce. it would be easier to just get rid of that altogether. safe money and stress.Keypoint: Marriages are unstable", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Weddings are joyous events for family and friends.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Even with high rates of divorce, married couples and the children of married parents ultimately have more stable and emotionally healthy lives than their unmarried counterparts.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is traditional and shows the unity between a couple.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage in an obsolete institution that legally entangles people and does not let them free without incuring costs.Keypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is the law of god and very moral.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an institution founded on the outdated notion that women are property and should be discontinuedKeypoint: Marriages are unstable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is revered in religious faith and has been an institution that provides legal and symbolic love and lifelong virtue.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is associated with stable families; stable families produce happier children.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an archaic form of oppression against women and should be abandoned. it is used to tie a woman to a man to support the man in his success while diminishing the woman to a subservient role.Keypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children from parents who are committed to each other grow up to be more well adjustedKeypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: To abandon marriage would be removing rights that people have bought into as a fundamental part of their existence, it harms no one and is incredibly meaningful for manyKeypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is a very important institution that must be kept as a bond between people that cannot be easily broken on a whimKeypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an important safeguard in terms of legal and financial binding.Keypoint: Marriage provides important financial benefits", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage shouldn't be abandoned because it's a historical union between two people that has been going on for centuries. we cannot stop people from being married because our societal system is built around itKeypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't abandon marriage because is important for society and union for peopleKeypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abandon marriage because it is important and a union made between two people under god.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage provides much needed emotional and financial stability for children.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage puts women in the subservient role and keeps them there.Keypoint: Marriages are unstable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an old construct that largely fails in our modern society. we simply aren't designed to be compatible through all stages of lifeKeypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is no longer necessary to obtain the benefits that have traditionally been associated with itKeypoint: Most of the advantages of marriage are achieved by a monogamous relationship", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage as a social institution is based on outdated notions of exchanging property and other resources in order to purchase or take ownership over a woman, and these practices should be abandoned.Keypoint: Marriages are unstable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage contributes a solild framework and structure to a relationship, gives legal representation and stability.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is the base of the society. children growing up in married couples are more stable and not stressed than the non-married couples oneKeypoint: Marriage provides important financial benefits", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abandon marriage since very few people marry these days and most that do end up in divorce.Keypoint: Marriages are unstable", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is revered in religious faith and has been an institution that provides legal and symbolic love and lifelong virtue.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage allows the legality of a spouse to be able to obtain medical information in the instance that a spouse is sick and/or hospitalized as well as acces to healthcare under a spouse's coverage plan.Keypoint: Marriage provides important financial benefits", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should never abandon the union of marriage sine that is what our higher power intended for a man and woman.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an expression of love, and the gravity of it encourages couples to persevere with their relationship through difficult periods.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage puts women in the subservient role and keeps them there.Keypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: I don't think we should abandon marriage, those that are happily married tend to live very long.Keypoint: Marriage makes people happy", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: I don't think we should abandon marriage, those that are happily married tend to live very long.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is not compatible with human biology, as is evidenced by rising divorce rates and continually high rates of infidelity amongst married individuals.Keypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: To abandon marriage would be removing rights that people have bought into as a fundamental part of their existence, it harms no one and is incredibly meaningful for manyKeypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Society needs people who commit to marriage rather than just living together as an example to children that a lifetime commitment really does mean that.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is a very important institution that must be kept as a bond between people that cannot be easily broken on a whimKeypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abandon marriage as with divorce rates so high it is clear that is has become an outmoded concept.Keypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abandon marriage because it is no longer relevant in society. not everyone has equal access to it which is unfair but also many of these marriages end in divorce.Keypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is a way to bring families together and to grow the web of support that one has in their lives by creating these bonds that are incredibly meaningful to people.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Too many marriages end up in divorce and many couples are just living together without it now.Keypoint: Marriages tie up people with unfair obligations", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an outdated institution that has little meaning in today's society when it is perfectly acceptable for unmarried couples to live together.Keypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is a dated institution that unfairly benefits the patriarchy.Keypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abandon marriage because it is an important commitment that helps keep society going.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abandon marriage because it is no longer relevant in society. not everyone has equal access to it which is unfair but also many of these marriages end in divorce.Keypoint: Marriages are unstable", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is the foundation for our society's basic family structureKeypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage provides a more stable enviroment in which to bring up childrenKeypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Committment and stability are important in the lives of children and marriage provides these qualitiesKeypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not get rid of marriage because it is a special union for both religious and non-religious families. with marriage, two people become one and they essentially share everything that they ownKeypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an institution that holds women down.Keypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is the ideal stable relationship to raise children and helps people to live longer more stable lives.Keypoint: Marriage makes the couple closer", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an outdated institution that rarely last very long anyway.Keypoint: Marriages are unstable", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abandon marriage because people don't stay married too often nowadays anywayKeypoint: Marriages are unstable", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is traditional and shows the unity between a couple.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is the foundation for our society's basic family structureKeypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is not compatible with human biology, as is evidenced by rising divorce rates and continually high rates of infidelity amongst married individuals.Keypoint: Most of the advantages of marriage are achieved by a monogamous relationship", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is too ingrained in our culture to abandon.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By adopting such practice we can get rid of all the burdens associate with marriage like financial, legal and social obligations.Keypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Too many marriages end up in divorce and many couples are just living together without it now.Keypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an outdated institution that rarely last very long anyway.Keypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage provides a safe, secure foundation for children.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an important covenant relationship that should be protected at all costs.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is a sacred act in several religions and abandoning it removes that from them. we can't do that.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage provides much needed emotional and financial stability for children.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A couple doesn't have to bind themselves legally to one another, by marrying, to prove their love.Keypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage often serves both culturally and religiously important purposes, and abandoning marriage altogether is likely impossible because of the deep ties it has in a persons identity and conception of the world.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abandon marriage because many religious people still believe in marriageKeypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an outdated tradition that usually ends in divorce anyways.Keypoint: Marriages are unstable", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an out-dated patriarchal system of ownership of women that has no place in modern societies.Keypoint: Marriages are unstable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage shouldn't be abandoned because it is a scared thing and bonds two people together as one and many people still believe in thatKeypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage traps people into a legal contract that they find hard to get out of if they decide later that it is not what was right for them.Keypoint: Marriages tie up people with unfair obligations", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abandon marriage because a lot of people don't take their wedding vows seriously any way and cheat on their spouseKeypoint: Marriages are unstable", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage and the accompanying wedding imposes massive financial hardship at the start of a relationship, often contributing to its eventual dissolution.Keypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is a sacred act in several religions and abandoning it removes that from them. we can't do that.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage has roots in patriarchy and misogyny therefore it is time to move on to a new system.Keypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an expression of love, and the gravity of it encourages couples to persevere with their relationship through difficult periods.Keypoint: Marriage makes people happy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an old construct that largely fails in our modern society. we simply aren't designed to be compatible through all stages of lifeKeypoint: Marriages are unstable", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an important bond between people that offers financial and social benefits for those who choose to participate.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is one of the fundamental pillars to be able to form a familyKeypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an important religious ceremony and belief system, which provides a stability and family values.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage in an obsolete institution that legally entangles people and does not let them free without incuring costs.Keypoint: Marriages tie up people with unfair obligations", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abandon marriage because in the world we live in today does not need marriage. many people live together and are perfectly happy without being married.Keypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is something given from god and abandon it will be disaster for humanity and the chaos door will be wide open.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is one of the fundamental pillars to be able to form a familyKeypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage, weddings and divorces, they cost thousands and thousands and mean very little, often causing more stress and upheaval than happinessKeypoint: Marriages are unstable", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It provides a stable environment for childrenKeypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage should not be abandoned as formal religious bonding keeps couples togetherKeypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage as a social institution is based on outdated notions of exchanging property and other resources in order to purchase or take ownership over a woman, and these practices should be abandoned.Keypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is sacred and confirms a couples commitment to one another.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage between two people creates a committed union forming the basis of a strong and secure union that is a safe setting to nurture children. it is a statement to the world of a bond between two peoples.Keypoint: Marriage provides important financial benefits", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage provides stability and it helps familiesKeypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is still a valuable part of our societyKeypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is very important to some people and should be available to themKeypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is very important to some people and should be available to themKeypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abandon marriage because in the world we live in today does not need marriage. many people live together and are perfectly happy without being married.Keypoint: Most of the advantages of marriage are achieved by a monogamous relationship", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage can be difficult to dissolve if the relationship breaks down. without marriage the couple will be able to get on with their separate lives much quicker.Keypoint: Most of the advantages of marriage are achieved by a monogamous relationship", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is a way for a couple to deepen their bonds to each other.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: As society and values change, marriage is no longer as popular as it once was and divorce rates continue to climb.Keypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abandon marriage because it's a tradition and it shows the love and trust between two individuals.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The legality of marriage helps with health care and government benefits,Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is a way for a couple to deepen their bonds to each other.Keypoint: Marriage makes the couple closer", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an institution founded on the outdated notion that women are property and should be discontinuedKeypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Weddings are an economic boon for many sectors of society.Keypoint: Marriage provides important financial benefits", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By adopting such practice we can get rid of all the burdens associate with marriage like financial, legal and social obligations.Keypoint: Marriages tie up people with unfair obligations", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Society needs people who commit to marriage rather than just living together as an example to children that a lifetime commitment really does mean that.Keypoint: Marriage makes people happy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is no need for marriage in this society. too many marriages end in divorce. it would be easier to just get rid of that altogether. safe money and stress.Keypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is the ideal stable relationship to raise children and helps people to live longer more stable lives.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is a wholesome, normal act that teaches family values. we shouldn't be abandoning the concept but rather fear why more marriages are failing these days and fix it.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriages are no longer lasting at the same rate they have been, so it should be avoided.Keypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage provides stability and it helps familiesKeypoint: Marriage makes people happy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage contributes a solild framework and structure to a relationship, gives legal representation and stability.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage as a social institution is based on outdated notions of exchanging property and other resources in order to purchase or take ownership over a woman, and these practices should be abandoned.Keypoint: Most of the advantages of marriage are achieved by a monogamous relationship", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children have better outcomes in life when their parents are marriedKeypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is a social construct to oppress women & is backed by & enforced by the patriarchyKeypoint: Marriages are unstable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Even with high rates of divorce, married couples and the children of married parents ultimately have more stable and emotionally healthy lives than their unmarried counterparts.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is associated with stable families; stable families produce happier children.Keypoint: Marriage provides important financial benefits", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should never abandon marriage. it means making a commitment and sticking to it through good and bad. it's a way to show someone how much they mean to you.Keypoint: Marriage makes the couple closer", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is outdated and is no longer needed as people rarely stay together anyway.Keypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is still a tradition that many people uphold and should not abandon.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage, weddings and divorces, they cost thousands and thousands and mean very little, often causing more stress and upheaval than happinessKeypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abandon marriage as with divorce rates so high it is clear that is has become an outmoded concept.Keypoint: Marriages are unstable", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is a legal relationship so you can claim certain benefits and get inheritance when your loved ones dies.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage has important religious groundings and we should not forbid people from following and adhering to their faith.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The legality of marriage helps with health care and government benefits,Keypoint: Marriage provides important financial benefits", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It provides a stable environment for childrenKeypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is a solid foundation with which to build a family and it should be held as sacred always.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an importiant part of family life.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't abandon marriage because is important for society and union for peopleKeypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Very few marriages work out anymore and there are more divorces then ever.Keypoint: Marriages are unstable", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: So many marriages end in divorce these days that there barely seems any point in it.Keypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Far too many marriages dissolve before the death of either individual; we might as well get rid of marriages entirely.Keypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is a sacred bond that is highly regarded in various religions.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abandon marriage because people don't stay married too often nowadays anywayKeypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is too ingrained in our culture to abandon.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be free to do what they want with other consenting adults, and so if two people want to get married the state and society should not denounce them or stand in their way.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an outdated insitution that is not seen in the same way as it was years ago tying two people together and costs both parties a huge amount of money to get out of if they want to end the marriage.Keypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is still valid for those who belief in the commitmentKeypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an outdated institution that has little meaning in today's society when it is perfectly acceptable for unmarried couples to live together.Keypoint: Most of the advantages of marriage are achieved by a monogamous relationship", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: So many marriages end in divorce these days that there barely seems any point in it.Keypoint: Marriages are unstable", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage helps to ensure the both parties and their children receive the support that is needed in life.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an important covenant relationship that should be protected at all costs.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abandon marriage because many religious people still believe in marriageKeypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Committment and stability are important in the lives of children and marriage provides these qualitiesKeypoint: Marriage makes people happy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children from parents who are committed to each other grow up to be more well adjustedKeypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage can be difficult to dissolve if the relationship breaks down. without marriage the couple will be able to get on with their separate lives much quicker.Keypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage provides a more stable enviroment in which to bring up childrenKeypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an outdated insitution that is not seen in the same way as it was years ago tying two people together and costs both parties a huge amount of money to get out of if they want to end the marriage.Keypoint: Marriages tie up people with unfair obligations", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should never abandon marriage. it means making a commitment and sticking to it through good and bad. it's a way to show someone how much they mean to you.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage still holds a place in tradition and in the lawKeypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an expression of love, and the gravity of it encourages couples to persevere with their relationship through difficult periods.Keypoint: Marriage makes the couple closer", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Most marriages end in divorce, which causes an economic hardship on both parties. it makes more financial sense to not get married in the first placeKeypoint: Most of the advantages of marriage are achieved by a monogamous relationship", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A couple doesn't have to bind themselves legally to one another, by marrying, to prove their love.Keypoint: Most of the advantages of marriage are achieved by a monogamous relationship", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is a sacred agreement between two people and should be honoredKeypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is a way to bring families together and to grow the web of support that one has in their lives by creating these bonds that are incredibly meaningful to people.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: To preserve the assets of the couple, marriage is absolutely necessaryKeypoint: Marriage provides important financial benefits", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage allows the legality of a spouse to be able to obtain medical information in the instance that a spouse is sick and/or hospitalized as well as acces to healthcare under a spouse's coverage plan.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Studies show that people who are married are happier and healthier than those who are notKeypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't abandon marriage because is important for faith and peaceKeypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage helps to ensure the both parties and their children receive the support that is needed in life.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an important institution that can provide a secure foundation for raising children.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is not compatible with human biology, as is evidenced by rising divorce rates and continually high rates of infidelity amongst married individuals.Keypoint: Marriages are unstable", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is a solid foundation with which to build a family and it should be held as sacred always.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is a sacred bond that is highly regarded in various religions.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is a sacred agreement between two people and should be honoredKeypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is still important when recognised in law and brings stability to a family.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an outdated institution that has little meaning in today's society when it is perfectly acceptable for unmarried couples to live together.Keypoint: Marriages are unstable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage shouldn't be abandoned because of the affect that it can have on both parties financesKeypoint: Marriage provides important financial benefits", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not get rid of marriage because it is a special union for both religious and non-religious families. with marriage, two people become one and they essentially share everything that they ownKeypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is still a tradition that many people uphold and should not abandon.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an out-dated patriarchal system of ownership of women that has no place in modern societies.Keypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Weddings are an economic boon for many sectors of society.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is a sacred thing for many people and should not be abandoned.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Far too many marriages dissolve before the death of either individual; we might as well get rid of marriages entirely.Keypoint: Marriages are unstable", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some cultures rely on marriage to be with their partners without being punished.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is still a valuable part of our societyKeypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Married people enjoy better health and longer lives than unmarried people.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is becoming obsolete with more and more youth cohabiting without the need to celebrate anything. celebration is costly and deprive couples the means for sustaining their familyKeypoint: Most of the advantages of marriage are achieved by a monogamous relationship", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is antiquated and not necessary for couples who are committed to each other.Keypoint: Most of the advantages of marriage are achieved by a monogamous relationship", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is becoming obsolete with more and more youth cohabiting without the need to celebrate anything. celebration is costly and deprive couples the means for sustaining their familyKeypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage provides stability and a commitment between people which strengthens relationships and to abandon it would be to turn out backs on something good.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Fifty percent of marriages end in divorce which is letting us know that the idea of marriage as lifelong is no longer realisticKeypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should never abandon the union of marriage sine that is what our higher power intended for a man and woman.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage has roots in patriarchy and misogyny therefore it is time to move on to a new system.Keypoint: Marriages are unstable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is a wholesome, normal act that teaches family values. we shouldn't be abandoning the concept but rather fear why more marriages are failing these days and fix it.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Most of the tine marriage just ends in divorce anyway.Keypoint: Marriages are unstable", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage traps people into a legal contract that they find hard to get out of if they decide later that it is not what was right for them.Keypoint: Marriages are unstable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is a way to bring families together and to grow the web of support that one has in their lives by creating these bonds that are incredibly meaningful to people.Keypoint: Marriage provides important financial benefits", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is still valid for those who belief in the commitmentKeypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an important safeguard in terms of legal and financial binding.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage should not be abandoned as formal religious bonding keeps couples togetherKeypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is confining and restricting and serves no purposeKeypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is the ideal stable relationship to raise children and helps people to live longer more stable lives.Keypoint: Marriage provides important financial benefits", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage still holds a place in tradition and in the lawKeypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abandon marriage because it is an old contract that serves no purpose in our world, and ties people together unnecessarilyKeypoint: Marriages tie up people with unfair obligations", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage shouldn't be abandoned because of the affect that it can have on both parties financesKeypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Most marriages end in divorce, which causes an economic hardship on both parties. it makes more financial sense to not get married in the first placeKeypoint: Marriages tie up people with unfair obligations", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is something given from god and abandon it will be disaster for humanity and the chaos door will be wide open.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Fifty percent of marriages end in divorce which is letting us know that the idea of marriage as lifelong is no longer realisticKeypoint: Marriages are unstable", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage shouldn't be abandoned because it is a scared thing and bonds two people together as one and many people still believe in thatKeypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is one of the essential elements of society. it is centered around the concept of forming strong, coherent and dependable family.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage makes you lose your personal freedom and having to share everything with your partner, it should be abandonedKeypoint: Marriages are unstable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is now an institution that fails in the majority of cases - it is clearly an expensive, outdated avenue.Keypoint: Marriages are unstable", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is a straight-forward way to legalise a union and ensure arrangements such as inheritances and benefits are simplified.Keypoint: Marriage provides important financial benefits", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage makes you lose your personal freedom and having to share everything with your partner, it should be abandonedKeypoint: Most of the advantages of marriage are achieved by a monogamous relationship", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abandon marriage because it's a tradition and it shows the love and trust between two individuals.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abandon marriage because a lot of people are living together without being married so it's a waste to have marriages nowadaysKeypoint: Most of the advantages of marriage are achieved by a monogamous relationship", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some cultures rely on marriage to be with their partners without being punished.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Most marriages end in divorce, which causes an economic hardship on both parties. it makes more financial sense to not get married in the first placeKeypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abandon marriage because it is important and a union made between two people under god.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't abandon marriage because is important for faith and peaceKeypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: To preserve the assets of the couple, marriage is absolutely necessaryKeypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage offers a greater potential for increasing wealth.Keypoint: Marriage provides important financial benefits", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an expression of love, and the gravity of it encourages couples to persevere with their relationship through difficult periods.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is associated with stable families; stable families produce happier children.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is a sacred thing for many people and should not be abandoned.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is a straight-forward way to legalise a union and ensure arrangements such as inheritances and benefits are simplified.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage often serves both culturally and religiously important purposes, and abandoning marriage altogether is likely impossible because of the deep ties it has in a persons identity and conception of the world.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: With divorce rates up so high, we should abandon marriage as an archaic and broken tradition.Keypoint: Marriages are unstable", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage and the accompanying wedding imposes massive financial hardship at the start of a relationship, often contributing to its eventual dissolution.Keypoint: Marriages tie up people with unfair obligations", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is not only a status that is recognized by the government, it is also a religious union and committment.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is one of the essential elements of society. it is centered around the concept of forming strong, coherent and dependable family.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Married people enjoy better health and longer lives than unmarried people.Keypoint: Marriage makes people happy", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an important institution that can provide a secure foundation for raising children.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is a sacred act in many religions. there's no reason to abandon it completely. don't want to get married, don't do. abandonment is not the answer.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is antiquated and not necessary for couples who are committed to each other.Keypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage makes you lose your personal freedom and having to share everything with your partner, it should be abandonedKeypoint: Marriages tie up people with unfair obligations", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is a social construct to oppress women & is backed by & enforced by the patriarchyKeypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abandon marriage because it is an old contract that serves no purpose in our world, and ties people together unnecessarilyKeypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage provides a stable and secure home for the children and should not be abandoned.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not get rid of marriage because it is a special union for both religious and non-religious families. with marriage, two people become one and they essentially share everything that they ownKeypoint: Marriage makes people happy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage between two people creates a committed union forming the basis of a strong and secure union that is a safe setting to nurture children. it is a statement to the world of a bond between two peoples.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is not only a status that is recognized by the government, it is also a religious union and committment.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage and the accompanying wedding imposes massive financial hardship at the start of a relationship, often contributing to its eventual dissolution.Keypoint: Most of the advantages of marriage are achieved by a monogamous relationship", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is now an institution that fails in the majority of cases - it is clearly an expensive, outdated avenue.Keypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage traps people into a legal contract that they find hard to get out of if they decide later that it is not what was right for them.Keypoint: Most of the advantages of marriage are achieved by a monogamous relationship", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is the base of the society. children growing up in married couples are more stable and not stressed than the non-married couples oneKeypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Weddings are joyous events for family and friends.Keypoint: Marriage makes people happy", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage can be difficult to dissolve if the relationship breaks down. without marriage the couple will be able to get on with their separate lives much quicker.Keypoint: Marriages tie up people with unfair obligations", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is a dated institution that unfairly benefits the patriarchy.Keypoint: Marriages are unstable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children have better outcomes in life when their parents are marriedKeypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is a sacred act in many religions. there's no reason to abandon it completely. don't want to get married, don't do. abandonment is not the answer.Keypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage shouldn't be abandoned because it's a historical union between two people that has been going on for centuries. we cannot stop people from being married because our societal system is built around itKeypoint: Marriage is important for people, either generally or because of religious/traditional reasons", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is confining and restricting and serves no purposeKeypoint: Marriages tie up people with unfair obligations", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: As society and values change, marriage is no longer as popular as it once was and divorce rates continue to climb.Keypoint: Marriages are unstable", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage provides a safe, secure foundation for children.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Too many marriages end up in divorce and many couples are just living together without it now.Keypoint: Marriages are unstable", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should never abandon marriage. it means making a commitment and sticking to it through good and bad. it's a way to show someone how much they mean to you.Keypoint: Marriage provides important financial benefits", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an outdated tradition that usually ends in divorce anyways.Keypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be free to do what they want with other consenting adults, and so if two people want to get married the state and society should not denounce them or stand in their way.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is still important when recognised in law and brings stability to a family.Keypoint: Marriage makes people happy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage offers a greater potential for increasing wealth.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an archaic form of oppression against women and should be abandoned. it is used to tie a woman to a man to support the man in his success while diminishing the woman to a subservient role.Keypoint: Marriages are unstable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is sacred and confirms a couples commitment to one another.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an important bond between people that offers financial and social benefits for those who choose to participate.Keypoint: Marriage provides important financial benefits", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Most of the tine marriage just ends in divorce anyway.Keypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an important religious ceremony and belief system, which provides a stability and family values.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an institution that holds women down.Keypoint: Marriages are unstable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Very few marriages work out anymore and there are more divorces then ever.Keypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abandon marriage because a lot of people don't take their wedding vows seriously any way and cheat on their spouseKeypoint: Marriage preserves norms that are harmful for women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abandon marriage because it is an important commitment that helps keep society going.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is outdated and is no longer needed as people rarely stay together anyway.Keypoint: Marriages are unstable", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marriage is an importiant part of family life.Keypoint: Marriage benefits children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - } - ] -} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/tasks/task1288_kpa_keypoint_matching_capital_punishment_topic.json b/tasks/task1288_kpa_keypoint_matching_capital_punishment_topic.json deleted file mode 100644 index bafd422da..000000000 --- a/tasks/task1288_kpa_keypoint_matching_capital_punishment_topic.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2391 +0,0 @@ -{ - "Contributors": [ - "Arjun Ashok" - ], - "Source": [ - "ArgKP (https://github.com/IBM/KPA_2021_shared_task)" - ], - "Definition": "The input contains an argument and a keypoint on the topic \"We should abolish capital punishment\", separated by \"\".Your task is to answer if the keypoint matches the argument and summarizes exactly what the argument means, in the context of this topic.", - "Categories": [ - "Classification -> Verification -> Summary Verification", - "Text Comparison" - ], - "Domains": [ - "Reviews", - "Law", - "Dialogue" - ], - "Input_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Output_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Instruction_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Positive Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment has been proven ineffective in reducing crime rates.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that capital punishment has been proven ineffective in reducing crime rates." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: In places where capital punishment is legal, it is often used in discriminatory ways against minority groups, and therefore we should abolish it to prevent disproportionate punishment against the most vulnerable people in society.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that in places where capital punishment is legal, it is often used in discriminatory ways against minority groups, and therefore we should abolish it to prevent disproportionate punishment against the most vulnerable people in society." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is irreversible, there are too many miscarriages of justice to justify retention of the penalty.Keypoint: The death penalty irreversible", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that capital punishment is irreversible, there are too many miscarriages of justice to justify retention of the penalty." - } - ], - "Negative Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: There are some crimes so heinous, such as child rape and murder, that capital punishment is the only appropriate punishment for the crime as well as to act as a deterrent to othersKeypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that there are some crimes so heinous, such as child rape and murder, that capital punishment is the only appropriate punishment for the crime as well as to act as a deterrent to others" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment provides permanent closure to victims and their families who have experienced immense trauma and have been subjected to intense pain by the criminal.Keypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that capital punishment provides permanent closure to victims and their families who have experienced immense trauma and have been subjected to intense pain by the criminal." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is irreversible, there are too many miscarriages of justice to justify retention of the penalty.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that capital punishment is irreversible, there are too many miscarriages of justice to justify retention of the penalty." - } - ], - "Instances": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment provides permanent closure to victims and their families who have experienced immense trauma and have been subjected to intense pain by the criminal.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is never a good message to propagate - that taking a life solves any problemKeypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment acts as the ultimate deterrent for the most heinous of crimes, and saves vast amounts of money that would be spent keeping such offenders in jail for ever more.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is a barbaric practice that is outdated and shouldn't exist in a civilized society.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is simply a waste of resources, and it does not serve as an effective deterrent to major crimes.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A basic principle of punishment is that it should be proportional to the crime, and therefore capital punishment is the only legitimate response to a crime such as first degree murder.Keypoint: The death penalty is proportional", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Too much of our taxes go towards paying for bad people, capital punishment would reduce jail spending.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment provides a punishment that is equal to the crime committed. if you kill you should expect to be killed.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is a conscious act of murdering someoneKeypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment provides a more effective deterrent that simple fines, penalties or light sentences in prison.Keypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is cruel and in some cases people have been punished for crimes they didn't commitKeypoint: The death penalty is a waste of resources", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is never a good message to propagate - that taking a life solves any problemKeypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is just ineffective. most states that still use it as punishment actually have higher murder rates and crime than those that do not.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is morally wrong, since it can never be acceptable to take a human life; applying an act of violence as a response to an act of violence is not a solution.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Death penalty brings closure to families and saving taxpayers millions of dollars every yearKeypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is cruel and in some cases people have been punished for crimes they didn't commitKeypoint: The death penalty irreversible", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment acts as the ultimate deterrent - serious crime levels will drop due to the risk of paying the ultimate price.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some crimes are too grievous for a simple prison term and capital punishment is very important.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some crimes are so heinous that the only just punishment is the death penalty.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is better to retain the death penalty because imprisoning people for the most serious crimes is not a good use of public funds in the long-term, particularly in the case of life sentences.Keypoint: The death penalty saves costs to the state", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is a viable last resort for serious offenders with no possibility of rehabilitation.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is ample evidence showing that capital punishment does not constitute effective deterrence.Keypoint: The death penalty is ineffective in deterring crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some people have committed such unspeakable crimes that they don't deserve to liveKeypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is inhumane and unnecessary it teaches that violence is a solution it can open the door to abuseKeypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Government action informs citizens action, so government should not condone death in any way.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is a massive transgression of the dignity of life, which should have no exceptions.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abolish capital punishment because there is no possibility of correcting a miscarriage of justice where people have died for crimes they did not commit.Keypoint: The death penalty irreversible", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are many instances of innocence being proved at a later dateKeypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Taxes shouldn't have to pay for criminals to live comfortably after they've committed horrific crimes.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is good at keeping dangerous criminals off of the streets.Keypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need capital punishment to deter serious crimesKeypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment has been proven to deter violent crimeKeypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is basically taking the life of an unarmed, helpless person.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Crime rates in states with capital punishment is no different than crime rates in states without, proving that it is an ineffective deterrent.Keypoint: The death penalty is ineffective in deterring crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many people deserve to die for their actionsKeypoint: The death penalty saves costs to the state", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is simply a waste of resources, and it does not serve as an effective deterrent to major crimes.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment sends a message to other criminals that if you commit an awful crime you will be severely punishedKeypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Why should evil people be taken care of their whole lives while in prison. killing them saves money.Keypoint: The death penalty saves costs to the state", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The death penalty is outdated and immoral - there is no justification for taking a person's life.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The death penalty and capital punishment serves as an effective deterrent to discourage people from committing crimes.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is a real deterant to crime and should not be abolished.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The death penalty is incompatible with human rights and human dignityKeypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The death penalty is a racially biased punishment, and also ineffective in deterring crimeKeypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are some crimes so heinous, such as child rape and murder, that capital punishment is the only appropriate punishment for the crime as well as to act as a deterrent to othersKeypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Dangerous criminals that can not be rehabilitated and are a danger to society should be subjected to capital punishment.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment should be abolished because too many innocent people are put to death because they have been wrongly accused.Keypoint: The death penalty irreversible", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abolish capital punishment because it is inhumane to kill a human being. an eye for an eye doesn't do us any good. they just need to be changed to a better person, not killed.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is expensive and inhumane.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without capital punishment truly dangerous perpetrators always have the potential of finding some way out of jail and causing more harm to society.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Very long sentences represent a huge expense for taxpayersKeypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Given that we can almost never guarantee that someone isn't wrongly convicted, we shouldn't have capital punishment because it can't be undone if new evidence comes out.Keypoint: The death penalty irreversible", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment would be unfair to those who were wrongfully sentenced to death for a crime they did not commit.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is a massive transgression of the dignity of life, which should have no exceptions.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The death penalty has never been proven as a detterent to crime.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some murderers are so brutal they must be executedKeypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We have seen too many cases of overturned judgments as new technologies and evidence have come to light, rendering capital punishment inherently problematic.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Crimes that get the death penalty are rarely premeditated, which means capital punishment doesn't function as a deterant.Keypoint: The death penalty is ineffective in deterring crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment remains a good deterrent for serious crimeKeypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is needed as a deterrent to murder.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It has been proven that some people who were put to death were actually innocent of the crime.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It has been proven that some people who were put to death were actually innocent of the crime.Keypoint: The death penalty irreversible", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If someone was found not guilty, they wouldn't be able to bring him back to life after being killed under false accusationsKeypoint: The death penalty irreversible", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We have seen too many cases of overturned judgments as new technologies and evidence have come to light, rendering capital punishment inherently problematic.Keypoint: The death penalty irreversible", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is an important deterrent to those who may consider committing a serious crime.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is simply a waste of resources, and it does not serve as an effective deterrent to major crimes.Keypoint: The death penalty is a waste of resources", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If reserved for extreme cases, capital punishment can send a strong message that society condemns such crimes.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: No-one has ever proven with numbers that killing murderers stops other people committing similar crimesKeypoint: The death penalty is ineffective in deterring crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many executions are botched and thus produce excessive and unjustified pain and tortureKeypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Taking a life is an irreversible decision, and there have been many proven miscarriages of justice in past that could not be remedied due to such punishment.Keypoint: The death penalty irreversible", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is no credible evidence that the death penalty deters crime more effectively than a prison termKeypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Government action informs citizens action, so government should not condone death in any way.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is inhumane. by killing someone legally, you become as bad as the criminals.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment allows for victims' families to get justice equal to the crime committed (usually murder).Keypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment acts as the ultimate deterrent for the most heinous of crimes, and saves vast amounts of money that would be spent keeping such offenders in jail for ever more.Keypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment must be retained as the ultimate punishment for the most heinous crime. an example needs to be shown to others that this in a consequence of you actions think again.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment serves as a deterrent for criminals. they see the negative consequences of the actions of themselves and others.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Strict capital punishment brings justice and closure to the victim's familyKeypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment can potentially lead to the death of innocent men. there are cases where there is strong doubt that the person executed actually carried out the crime.Keypoint: The death penalty irreversible", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Taxes shouldn't have to pay for criminals to live comfortably after they've committed horrific crimes.Keypoint: The death penalty saves costs to the state", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is preferable to costly appeals that the taxpayers have to cover.Keypoint: The death penalty saves costs to the state", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Since abolishing the death penalty in 1976, murder rate in canada has steadily declined and as of 2016 was at its lowest since 1966Keypoint: The death penalty is ineffective in deterring crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If you kill or rape someone you deserve to die.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment provides both the ultimate deterrent, and the ultimate penalty, for the most heinous of crimes.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nobody has the right to take another person's life no matter how evil that person may be.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment doesn't stop a crime.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: As the only actor that can legitimately wield the use of force, the state has an reparative obligation to victims and their families to seek retribution against criminals, and this includes the use of capital punishment.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is barbaric, ties up a lot of resources, and doesn't really act as a deterrent to major crimes.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment has been proven to deter violent crimeKeypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Everyone is capable of being reformed, but that is impossible with the death penalty.Keypoint: The death penalty irreversible", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment provides a punishment that is equal to the crime committed. if you kill you should expect to be killed.Keypoint: The death penalty is proportional", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The death penalty and capital punishment serves as an effective deterrent to discourage people from committing crimes.Keypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many people deserve to die for their actionsKeypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abolish capital punishment because there is no possibility of correcting a miscarriage of justice where people have died for crimes they did not commit.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment provides both the ultimate deterrent, and the ultimate penalty, for the most heinous of crimes.Keypoint: The death penalty is proportional", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment disincentives people to commit crimesKeypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If someone is guilty of heinous crimes it is only fair that they suffer the consequencesKeypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: For some people the crimes committed are so horrendous that the perpetrator must never be allowed to spend time with decent people again, the only way to guarantee this is by capital punishmentKeypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A basic principle of punishment is that it should be proportional to the crime, and therefore capital punishment is the only legitimate response to a crime such as first degree murder.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is a conscious act of murdering someoneKeypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment helps deter serious crime.Keypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is an immoral act.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are crimes for which it is the only responseKeypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment can be a deterrent if criminals know this is the ultimate punishmentKeypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Because there are a lot of innocent people who are in prison there is a good chance that you would kill a person and would later find out that they did not commit the crimeKeypoint: The death penalty irreversible", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment remains a good deterrent for serious crimeKeypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is often the only viable response to certain crimes and should be upheldKeypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guilty people deserve to be punished in proportion to the severity of their crime. thus, the death penalty is a just punishment for murder - a life for a life.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment frees up space in jail, allowing for less prisons overall.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment should remain in affect as a deterrent to horrific crimes so that these types of crimes do not get out of hand.Keypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment allows for victims' families to get justice equal to the crime committed (usually murder).Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment often comes at a higher cost to the state and taxpayers than simply leaving someone in jail for life, meaning that abolishing capital punishment would save time and pressure on the courts.Keypoint: The death penalty is a waste of resources", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Potential criminals will be scared to suffer such harsh punishment and as a result, they will be hesitant to commit crimesKeypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When the death penalty is performed, there is no chance for the individual to escape and commit another crimeKeypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Recent investigations consistently demonstrate a strong link between executions and reduced murder ratesKeypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Recent investigations consistently demonstrate a strong link between executions and reduced murder ratesKeypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment helps deter serious crime.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment provides closure for victim's families who can be reassured that the perpetrator can literally never harm anyone again.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is an unfair attempt to the sanctity of life. no offender merits this kind of sentencingKeypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: I believe abolishing capital punishment because it's murder. we shouldn't play god and decide if someone should live or die. we can put them in solitary confinement for life instead.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Unlike prison sentences, the death penalty is irreversible and irreparableKeypoint: The death penalty irreversible", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is a barbaric and inhumane practice that is outdated.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Crimes that get the death penalty are rarely premeditated, which means capital punishment doesn't function as a deterant.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guilty people deserve to be punished in proportion to the severity of their crime. thus, the death penalty is a just punishment for murder - a life for a life.Keypoint: The death penalty is proportional", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The most obvious reason to oppose is the danger that an innocent person is killed due to the fact that mistakes are made. witnesses can be wrong in what they saw and lawyers can make a hash of defending a case.Keypoint: The death penalty irreversible", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abolish capital punishment because in term of religious view, god is the author of life and death so only god can decide who die and who lives when times comes.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment often comes at a higher cost to the state and taxpayers than simply leaving someone in jail for life, meaning that abolishing capital punishment would save time and pressure on the courts.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The punishment should be equal to the crime. it also might deter others from murder if they know they will lose their own life.Keypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is a strong deterrent. if someone know they will be put to death for committing a crime they will be less likely to do it.Keypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment provides solace to the loved ones of the deceased that the criminal will not be set free again.Keypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Government violence is more extreme than individual violence, making it so the death penalty is never justified.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There cannot be a just retribution for mass murder, for example, but surely death sentence would be closer to justice than subsisting such a murderer till the end of his days at the taxpayer's expense.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Because there are a lot of innocent people who are in prison there is a good chance that you would kill a person and would later find out that they did not commit the crimeKeypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If you kill or rape someone you deserve to die.Keypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Dangerous criminals that can not be rehabilitated and are a danger to society should be subjected to capital punishment.Keypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment disincentives people to commit crimesKeypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is simply a waste of resources, and it does not serve as an effective deterrent to major crimes.Keypoint: The death penalty is ineffective in deterring crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Innocent people may be wrongly convicted and executed.Keypoint: The death penalty irreversible", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It's the best deterrant there is to committing heinous crimes.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is the best method to ensure that a murderer does not kill againKeypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It has been shown that capital punishment doesn't deter crime, making it useless.Keypoint: The death penalty is ineffective in deterring crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Part of the purpose of punishment is to prevent dangerous people from committing further crimes, and capital punishment serves as protection against the most heinous offenders.Keypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment can provide more catharsis for victims than life in prison.Keypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment provides both the ultimate deterrent, and the ultimate penalty, for the most heinous of crimes.Keypoint: The death penalty saves costs to the state", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Too much of our taxes go towards paying for bad people, capital punishment would reduce jail spending.Keypoint: The death penalty saves costs to the state", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The death penalty is a racially biased punishment, and also ineffective in deterring crimeKeypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment can suffer from social or racial bias and in fact be used as a weapon against a certain section of societyKeypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is not a moral way of dealing with crime.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: In places where capital punishment is legal, it is often used in discriminatory ways against minority groups, and therefore we should abolish it to prevent disproportionate punishment against the most vulnerable people in society.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When someone dear to you is horribly mudered and mutilated, you understandably want retribution and justice, and in extreme cases you deserve itKeypoint: The death penalty saves costs to the state", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is nothing more than state violence directed towards a person in vengeance, making it morally wrong and an unjustified form of punishment.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abolish capital punishment because in term of religious view, god is the author of life and death so only god can decide who die and who lives when times comes.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is a barbaric and inhumane practice that is outdated.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment has done nothing to actually deter serious crime in this countryKeypoint: The death penalty is ineffective in deterring crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The death penalty has never been proven as a detterent to crime.Keypoint: The death penalty is ineffective in deterring crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are crimes for which it is the only responseKeypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are some crimes so heinous, such as child rape and murder, that capital punishment is the only appropriate punishment for the crime as well as to act as a deterrent to othersKeypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It doesn't deter crime and it's simply about revenge. the innocence project has exonerated twenty people on death row, and with their limited resources i have no doubt the number is higher.Keypoint: The death penalty is a waste of resources", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When someone dear to you is horribly mudered and mutilated, you understandably want retribution and justice, and in extreme cases you deserve itKeypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The death penalty is incompatible with human rights and human dignityKeypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abolish capital punishment because it deters terrorism.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment wrongly gives governments the power to take human life.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is barbaric, ties up a lot of resources, and doesn't really act as a deterrent to major crimes.Keypoint: The death penalty irreversible", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some people need more extreme punishments to stop them from their bad behavior and keep the public safe.Keypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We have the responsibility to punish those who deserve itKeypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is a barbaric practice which gives men too much power.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is seen as a cruel and inhumane way of treating prisoners.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: For some people the crimes committed are so horrendous that the perpetrator must never be allowed to spend time with decent people again, the only way to guarantee this is by capital punishmentKeypoint: The death penalty saves costs to the state", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By taking away the right to life of his victim, a murderer forfeits his own right to life.Keypoint: The death penalty is proportional", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment allows for equal justice type punishment and a means for the victim's family members to have some type of closure to such a horrible episode in their lives.Keypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There cannot be a just retribution for mass murder, for example, but surely death sentence would be closer to justice than subsisting such a murderer till the end of his days at the taxpayer's expense.Keypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The death penalty is a form of revenge which continues the cycle of violence.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment can influence better behaviorKeypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There have been instances where the person that faces capital punishment was later found to be not guilty of the crime that they have been accused of.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment can potentially lead to the death of innocent men. there are cases where there is strong doubt that the person executed actually carried out the crime.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abolish capital punishment because sometimes people are wrongfully accused and once dead cannot bring them back so life in prison is betterKeypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Death penalty brings closure to families and saving taxpayers millions of dollars every yearKeypoint: The death penalty saves costs to the state", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It will set bad example for others that people can get away with doing anythings and this will certainly increase crime rateKeypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is a barbaric practice which gives men too much power.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is a needed last threat to keep kids in line how need discipline in their lives.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Far too many innocent people have been hanged fir capital punishment to continue.Keypoint: The death penalty irreversible", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is archaic and barbaric. it is government sanctioned murder.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If reserved for extreme cases, capital punishment can send a strong message that society condemns such crimes.Keypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some crimes are so heinous and inherently wrong that they demand death penaltiesKeypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is inhumane and teaches that violence solves violence until the justice system is 100% correct all the time, we cannot risk killing someone that may later be proven innocentKeypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The old saying \"an eye for an eye\" exists for a reason. if a person commits a horrible act, than swift punishment is not only a good thing but deserved.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some crimes are so despicable that death is the only appropriate punishmentKeypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some people have committed such unspeakable crimes that they don't deserve to liveKeypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment can be a deterrent if criminals know this is the ultimate punishmentKeypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is often the only viable response to certain crimes and should be upheldKeypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is the most cost effective method of dealing with sociopathsKeypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment wrongly gives governments the power to take human life.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is 100% effective as a deterrent to the criminal being executed; that killer cannot commit any more crimesKeypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment dose not work and is barbaric.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is expensive and inhumane.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is inhumane. by killing someone legally, you become as bad as the criminals.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some criminals are too dangerous and have to be dealt with effectively, and capital punishment is the only choice.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: I believe abolishing capital punishment because it's murder. we shouldn't play god and decide if someone should live or die. we can put them in solitary confinement for life instead.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Death penalty brings closure to families and saving taxpayers millions of dollars every yearKeypoint: The death penalty is proportional", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is wrong because it's like committing murder.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment must be retained as the ultimate punishment for the most heinous crime. an example needs to be shown to others that this in a consequence of you actions think again.Keypoint: The death penalty saves costs to the state", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment doesn't stop a crime.Keypoint: The death penalty is ineffective in deterring crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is a needed last threat to keep kids in line how need discipline in their lives.Keypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment sends a message to other criminals that if you commit an awful crime you will be severely punishedKeypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment should be abolished because too many innocent people are put to death because they have been wrongly accused.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abolish capital punishment because it deters terrorism.Keypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment can provide more catharsis for victims than life in prison.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The old saying \"an eye for an eye\" exists for a reason. if a person commits a horrible act, than swift punishment is not only a good thing but deserved.Keypoint: The death penalty is proportional", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abolish capital punishment because it brings fair closure for those that are suffering because the criminal still lives. in most cases because their loved one was murdered by the criminal.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is excessive, gruesome, and ties up resources unnecessarily.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is an important deterrent to those who may consider committing a serious crime.Keypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some criminals are too dangerous and have to be dealt with effectively, and capital punishment is the only choice.Keypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment provides a more effective deterrent that simple fines, penalties or light sentences in prison.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment normalizes government violence and having the power of life and death over citizens.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Criminals that have committed terrible crimes should not continue to be a burden to society.Keypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is cruel and in some cases people have been punished for crimes they didn't commitKeypoint: The death penalty is ineffective in deterring crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment can suffer from social or racial bias and in fact be used as a weapon against a certain section of societyKeypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Everyone is capable of being reformed, but that is impossible with the death penalty.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Recent dna evidence have proved that some death penalty inmates to be innocent. executing one innocent person is an enough proof that the capital punishment should be abolished.Keypoint: The death penalty irreversible", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment can often cause great pain when being implemented and does not deter violent crime which is often committed in the throes of rage not to mention the injustice to the wrongly convicted.Keypoint: The death penalty is ineffective in deterring crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Recent dna evidence have proved that some death penalty inmates to be innocent. executing one innocent person is an enough proof that the capital punishment should be abolished.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is not credible statistical evidence that capital punishment reduces the rate of homicideKeypoint: The death penalty is ineffective in deterring crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: For some people the crimes committed are so horrendous that the perpetrator must never be allowed to spend time with decent people again, the only way to guarantee this is by capital punishmentKeypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We have the responsibility to punish those who deserve itKeypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Killing someone, outside of self defense, is never a positive choice.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some crimes are so heinous that the only just punishment is the death penalty.Keypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Unlike prison sentences, the death penalty is irreversible and irreparableKeypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment can often cause great pain when being implemented and does not deter violent crime which is often committed in the throes of rage not to mention the injustice to the wrongly convicted.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Murderers deserve to have a capital punishment.Keypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is better to retain the death penalty because imprisoning people for the most serious crimes is not a good use of public funds in the long-term, particularly in the case of life sentences.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The punishment should be equal to the crime. it also might deter others from murder if they know they will lose their own life.Keypoint: The death penalty saves costs to the state", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The death penalty is a form of revenge which continues the cycle of violence.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without harsh punishments for their offenses, criminals will be taking advantage of weaker people and victimsKeypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment should be abolished because man is not the one that should be making the decision to take a life, but leave that to the all mighty god.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment denies due process by making it impossible for new evidence or good behavior to change the sentence.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need capital punishment to deter serious crimesKeypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some crimes are too grievous for a simple prison term and capital punishment is very important.Keypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is 100% effective as a deterrent to the criminal being executed; that killer cannot commit any more crimesKeypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Strict capital punishment brings justice and closure to the victim's familyKeypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is a viable last resort for serious offenders with no possibility of rehabilitation.Keypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a person cannot and will not change, and would re-offend on release by killing others, then they should be stopped and should not be an expense to the taxpayer.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abolish capital punishment because it brings fair closure for those that are suffering because the criminal still lives. in most cases because their loved one was murdered by the criminal.Keypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abolish capital punishment because sometimes people are wrongfully accused and once dead cannot bring them back so life in prison is betterKeypoint: The death penalty irreversible", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It's the best deterrant there is to committing heinous crimes.Keypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: No-one has ever proven with numbers that killing murderers stops other people committing similar crimesKeypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment has done nothing to actually deter serious crime in this countryKeypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is cruel and in some cases people have been punished for crimes they didn't commitKeypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: As the only actor that can legitimately wield the use of force, the state has an reparative obligation to victims and their families to seek retribution against criminals, and this includes the use of capital punishment.Keypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Abolishing capital punishment means the victims' families will pay their taxes to support offenders who ruined their and their loved ones' lives. there is nothing merciful or humane in this; it is a sick, cruel joke.Keypoint: The death penalty saves costs to the state", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A state that outlaws murder cannot then turn around and murder prisoners in the name of the law. it is perverse and unjust.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The death penalty is outdated and immoral - there is no justification for taking a person's life.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Potential criminals will be scared to suffer such harsh punishment and as a result, they will be hesitant to commit crimesKeypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is cruel and unusual punishment.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment can serve as a useful deterrent to prevent crime as people who are thinking about committing heinous crimes may have second thoughts as they know they put be put to death themselves.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The most obvious reason to oppose is the danger that an innocent person is killed due to the fact that mistakes are made. witnesses can be wrong in what they saw and lawyers can make a hash of defending a case.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is needed as a deterrent to murder.Keypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is good at keeping dangerous criminals off of the streets.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without harsh punishments for their offenses, criminals will be taking advantage of weaker people and victimsKeypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment can serve as a useful deterrent to prevent crime as people who are thinking about committing heinous crimes may have second thoughts as they know they put be put to death themselves.Keypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is the most fitting retribution for heinous crimes such as serial killings or child rape - and sometimes even it isn't enough.Keypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is applied unfairly among the different races, so it should be replaced with a better form of punishment that treats everyone equally.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishments targets mostly men of color and sometimes even innocent people are put to death. you cannot make reparations to a person after you have killed them.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Murderers deserve to have a capital punishment.Keypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is a strong deterrent. if someone know they will be put to death for committing a crime they will be less likely to do it.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Death penalty brings closure to families and saving taxpayers millions of dollars every yearKeypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is not a moral way of dealing with crime.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is ample evidence showing that capital punishment does not constitute effective deterrence.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many people deserve to die for their actionsKeypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment has been proven ineffective in reducing crime rates.Keypoint: The death penalty is ineffective in deterring crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If someone is guilty of heinous crimes it is only fair that they suffer the consequencesKeypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Taking a life is an irreversible decision, and there have been many proven miscarriages of justice in past that could not be remedied due to such punishment.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many innocents have been killed as a result of capital punishment. even one innocent killed is one too many.Keypoint: The death penalty irreversible", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If someone was found not guilty, they wouldn't be able to bring him back to life after being killed under false accusationsKeypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Killing someone, outside of self defense, is never a positive choice.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment provides the best outcome for the families of victims. they can rest easier knowing that the person who harmed their family person can no longer hurt anyone.Keypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is too risky as sometimes innocent people are killed. unless it can be known for certain that a person is guilty, capital punishment wiill always present too much of a risk.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Government violence is more extreme than individual violence, making it so the death penalty is never justified.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is not credible statistical evidence that capital punishment reduces the rate of homicideKeypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Very long sentences lead to a lot of taxpayers spendingKeypoint: The death penalty saves costs to the state", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Criminals that have committed terrible crimes should not continue to be a burden to society.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is no credible evidence that capital punishment acts as a deterrentKeypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are many instances of innocence being proved at a later dateKeypoint: The death penalty irreversible", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is possible that we could provide capital punishment to an innocent individual.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The death penalty goes against our most basic human right - the right to lifeKeypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Abolishing capital punishment means the victims' families will pay their taxes to support offenders who ruined their and their loved ones' lives. there is nothing merciful or humane in this; it is a sick, cruel joke.Keypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A state that outlaws murder cannot then turn around and murder prisoners in the name of the law. it is perverse and unjust.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is too risky as sometimes innocent people are killed. unless it can be known for certain that a person is guilty, capital punishment wiill always present too much of a risk.Keypoint: The death penalty irreversible", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Killing people is wrong, no matter what crime they committedKeypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Killing people is wrong, no matter what crime they committedKeypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is applied unfairly among the different races, so it should be replaced with a better form of punishment that treats everyone equally.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment acts as the ultimate deterrent - serious crime levels will drop due to the risk of paying the ultimate price.Keypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Part of the purpose of punishment is to prevent dangerous people from committing further crimes, and capital punishment serves as protection against the most heinous offenders.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is no credible evidence that the death penalty deters crime more effectively than a prison termKeypoint: The death penalty is ineffective in deterring crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is seen as a cruel and inhumane way of treating prisoners.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment provides solace to the loved ones of the deceased that the criminal will not be set free again.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some murderers are so brutal they must be executedKeypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Why should evil people be taken care of their whole lives while in prison. killing them saves money.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is an immoral act.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Criminals that have committed terrible crimes should not continue to be a burden to society.Keypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is a real deterant to crime and should not be abolished.Keypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment allows for equal justice type punishment and a means for the victim's family members to have some type of closure to such a horrible episode in their lives.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is the best way of stopping a murderer from killing again.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The death penalty is not an effective deterrent to crimeKeypoint: The death penalty is ineffective in deterring crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There have been instances where the person that faces capital punishment was later found to be not guilty of the crime that they have been accused of.Keypoint: The death penalty irreversible", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By taking away the right to life of his victim, a murderer forfeits his own right to life.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment provides closure for victim's families who can be reassured that the perpetrator can literally never harm anyone again.Keypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment must be retained as the ultimate punishment for the most heinous crime. an example needs to be shown to others that this in a consequence of you actions think again.Keypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some crimes are so despicable that death is the only appropriate punishmentKeypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nobody has the right to take another person's life no matter how evil that person may be.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Crime rates in states with capital punishment is no different than crime rates in states without, proving that it is an ineffective deterrent.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is the only real solution for criminals who commit terrible crimes.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is wrong because it's like committing murder.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment breaks the human rights of the individuals being punished.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The death penalty is a violation of the human right to lifeKeypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment has historically been unfairly used more against minorities and the weak people in society, and i believe it's true todayKeypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Death penalty brings closure to families and saving taxpayers millions of dollars every yearKeypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is excessive, gruesome, and ties up resources unnecessarily.Keypoint: The death penalty is a waste of resources", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When someone dear to you is horribly mudered and mutilated, you understandably want retribution and justice, and in extreme cases you deserve itKeypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is barbaric, ties up a lot of resources, and doesn't really act as a deterrent to major crimes.Keypoint: The death penalty is ineffective in deterring crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is an unfair attempt to the sanctity of life. no offender merits this kind of sentencingKeypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This type of punishment is wrong because no one deserves to be treated that wayKeypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are some crimes so heinous, such as child rape and murder, that capital punishment is the only appropriate punishment for the crime as well as to act as a deterrent to othersKeypoint: The death penalty saves costs to the state", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There cannot be a just retribution for mass murder, for example, but surely death sentence would be closer to justice than subsisting such a murderer till the end of his days at the taxpayer's expense.Keypoint: The death penalty saves costs to the state", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Murderers deserve to have a capital punishment.Keypoint: The death penalty is proportional", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is preferable to costly appeals that the taxpayers have to cover.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It will set bad example for others that people can get away with doing anythings and this will certainly increase crime rateKeypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment breaks the human rights of the individuals being punished.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment should remain in affect as a deterrent to horrific crimes so that these types of crimes do not get out of hand.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is inhumane and teaches that violence solves violence until the justice system is 100% correct all the time, we cannot risk killing someone that may later be proven innocentKeypoint: The death penalty irreversible", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without capital punishment truly dangerous perpetrators always have the potential of finding some way out of jail and causing more harm to society.Keypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a person cannot and will not change, and would re-offend on release by killing others, then they should be stopped and should not be an expense to the taxpayer.Keypoint: The death penalty saves costs to the state", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is cruel and in some cases people have been punished for crimes they didn't commitKeypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment acts as the ultimate deterrent for the most heinous of crimes, and saves vast amounts of money that would be spent keeping such offenders in jail for ever more.Keypoint: The death penalty is proportional", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Far too many innocent people have been hanged fir capital punishment to continue.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is the only real solution for criminals who commit terrible crimes.Keypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The death penalty goes against our most basic human right - the right to lifeKeypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is cruel and unusual punishment.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The government shouldnt have the power to say who lives and who dies.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is possible that we could provide capital punishment to an innocent individual.Keypoint: The death penalty irreversible", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment normalizes government violence and having the power of life and death over citizens.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment serves as a deterrent for criminals. they see the negative consequences of the actions of themselves and others.Keypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is morally wrong, since it can never be acceptable to take a human life; applying an act of violence as a response to an act of violence is not a solution.Keypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is the most cost effective method of dealing with sociopathsKeypoint: The death penalty saves costs to the state", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Since abolishing the death penalty in 1976, murder rate in canada has steadily declined and as of 2016 was at its lowest since 1966Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This type of punishment is wrong because no one deserves to be treated that wayKeypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The government shouldnt have the power to say who lives and who dies.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment provides both the ultimate deterrent, and the ultimate penalty, for the most heinous of crimes.Keypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is nothing more than state violence directed towards a person in vengeance, making it morally wrong and an unjustified form of punishment.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Innocent people may be wrongly convicted and executed.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is inhumane and unnecessary it teaches that violence is a solution it can open the door to abuseKeypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many people deserve to die for their actionsKeypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is a barbaric practice that is outdated and shouldn't exist in a civilized society.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Very long sentences lead to a lot of taxpayers spendingKeypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some people need more extreme punishments to stop them from their bad behavior and keep the public safe.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is no credible evidence that capital punishment acts as a deterrentKeypoint: The death penalty is ineffective in deterring crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When the death penalty is performed, there is no chance for the individual to escape and commit another crimeKeypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment denies due process by making it impossible for new evidence or good behavior to change the sentence.Keypoint: The death penalty irreversible", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment has historically been unfairly used more against minorities and the weak people in society, and i believe it's true todayKeypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It doesn't deter crime and it's simply about revenge. the innocence project has exonerated twenty people on death row, and with their limited resources i have no doubt the number is higher.Keypoint: The death penalty is ineffective in deterring crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment frees up space in jail, allowing for less prisons overall.Keypoint: The death penalty saves costs to the state", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is archaic and barbaric. it is government sanctioned murder.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many innocents have been killed as a result of capital punishment. even one innocent killed is one too many.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Murderers deserve to have a capital punishment.Keypoint: The death penalty saves costs to the state", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Very long sentences represent a huge expense for taxpayersKeypoint: The death penalty saves costs to the state", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment dose not work and is barbaric.Keypoint: The death penalty is ineffective in deterring crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The punishment should be equal to the crime. it also might deter others from murder if they know they will lose their own life.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The death penalty is not an effective deterrent to crimeKeypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment can influence better behaviorKeypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is the most fitting retribution for heinous crimes such as serial killings or child rape - and sometimes even it isn't enough.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment provides the best outcome for the families of victims. they can rest easier knowing that the person who harmed their family person can no longer hurt anyone.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should continue to honor capital punishment because there are individuals that have done taken innocent lives and do not deserve to continue to live when there victim cannot.Keypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment would be unfair to those who were wrongfully sentenced to death for a crime they did not commit.Keypoint: The death penalty irreversible", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is the best method to ensure that a murderer does not kill againKeypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many people deserve to die for their actionsKeypoint: The death penalty is proportional", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It has been shown that capital punishment doesn't deter crime, making it useless.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Murderers deserve to have a capital punishment.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The death penalty is a violation of the human right to lifeKeypoint: The death penalty harms the disenfranchised", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is basically taking the life of an unarmed, helpless person.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abolish capital punishment because it is inhumane to kill a human being. an eye for an eye doesn't do us any good. they just need to be changed to a better person, not killed.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many executions are botched and thus produce excessive and unjustified pain and tortureKeypoint: The death penalty irreversible", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishments targets mostly men of color and sometimes even innocent people are put to death. you cannot make reparations to a person after you have killed them.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some crimes are so heinous and inherently wrong that they demand death penaltiesKeypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment should be abolished because man is not the one that should be making the decision to take a life, but leave that to the all mighty god.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should continue to honor capital punishment because there are individuals that have done taken innocent lives and do not deserve to continue to live when there victim cannot.Keypoint: The death penalty helps the victim/their family", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is just ineffective. most states that still use it as punishment actually have higher murder rates and crime than those that do not.Keypoint: The death penalty is ineffective in deterring crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is simply a waste of resources, and it does not serve as an effective deterrent to major crimes.Keypoint: The death penalty irreversible", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment provides both the ultimate deterrent, and the ultimate penalty, for the most heinous of crimes.Keypoint: The death penalty is acceptable in cases of severe crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Given that we can almost never guarantee that someone isn't wrongly convicted, we shouldn't have capital punishment because it can't be undone if new evidence comes out.Keypoint: State-sanctioned killing is principally wrong", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Capital punishment is the best way of stopping a murderer from killing again.Keypoint: The death penalty prevents crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - } - ] -} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/tasks/task1289_kpa_keypoint_matching_intellectual_property_rights.json b/tasks/task1289_kpa_keypoint_matching_intellectual_property_rights.json deleted file mode 100644 index 3d4257375..000000000 --- a/tasks/task1289_kpa_keypoint_matching_intellectual_property_rights.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2042 +0,0 @@ -{ - "Contributors": [ - "Arjun Ashok" - ], - "Source": [ - "ArgKP (https://github.com/IBM/KPA_2021_shared_task)" - ], - "Definition": "The input contains an argument and a keypoint on the topic \"We should abolish intellectual property rights\", separated by \"\".Your task is to answer if the keypoint matches the argument and summarizes exactly what the argument means, in the context of this topic.", - "Categories": [ - "Classification -> Verification -> Summary Verification", - "Text Comparison" - ], - "Domains": [ - "Reviews", - "Dialogue" - ], - "Input_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Output_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Instruction_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Positive Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: A song or writing are works of art and their creators should benefit from themKeypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that a song or writing are works of art and their creators should benefit from them" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to do away with intellectual property rights so it doesn't slow down innovationKeypoint: Intellectual property restricts access to important information/products", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that we need to do away with intellectual property rights so it doesn't slow down innovation" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights ensure that people or companies can make profits from what they have spent much time and effort in creating.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that intellectual property rights ensure that people or companies can make profits from what they have spent much time and effort in creating." - } - ], - "Negative Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: There is no reason to abolish these rights because, if a person came up with an idea, they should get credit for itKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that there is no reason to abolish these rights because, if a person came up with an idea, they should get credit for it" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights protect someone's research and hard work ensuring that they can be recognized and recompensed for their efforts.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that intellectual property rights protect someone's research and hard work ensuring that they can be recognized and recompensed for their efforts." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If abolished it will stiffle creativity and advancement because there will be no incentive if intellectual property is not a right.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that if abolished it will stiffle creativity and advancement because there will be no incentive if intellectual property is not a right." - } - ], - "Instances": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Abolishing intellectual property rights would damage the economy since there would be less incentive to bring new and innovative products to marketKeypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Abolishing intellectual property rights will give people more access to informationKeypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to protect the rights of copyright holders to safeguard the creative economy and should never open the market for rampant exploitation of recognisable contentKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights are what protects an individual who earns his living from that workKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The advantages of abolishing intellectual property rights greatly outweigh the reasons not to, for instance it would massively enhance continuous development.Keypoint: Intellectual property restricts access to important information/products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights should not be abolished as they provide security and protection to inventors to stop their hard work and financial investment being stolen and losing their just rewardsKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abolish intellectual property rights because it is a personal ideas, people work hard on the things they created and it is just not right people just take it and make it their own sometimesKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights are a barrier to innovation and further improvements to an idea by blocking others capitalising on ideas and technologyKeypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights mean that it is too expensive to access literature and music. abolishing these rights would make art more accessible to all.Keypoint: Intellectual property restricts access to important information/products", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights keep people from making needed improvements to ideas first thought of by someone else.Keypoint: Intellectual property restricts access to important information/products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shoudn't abolish intellectual property rights because a person should have the rights to change and make plans on something that they own without worrying about someone else stepping in.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights are a barrier to innovation and further improvements to an idea by blocking others capitalising on ideas and technologyKeypoint: Intellectual property rights are ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should have intellectual property rights so a company can protect their ideas.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abolish intellectual property rights because it can get very expensiveKeypoint: Intellectual property rights waste money", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights allows their creators to receive incentives for their work.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Property is property, whether intellectual or physical and belongs to whoever created it. their rights should be protected.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Creative property is just as important as physical work and should be protectedKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we abolish intellectual property rights there is the fear of ideas being stolen.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abolish intellectual property rights because once the property is put out there, everyone should have the right to use said property.Keypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: I think that we shouldn't abolish intellectual property rights for their hard workKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When a person creates a type of intellectual property, he has the right to own that property and dictate the use of it, since he is the one who made the effort to make that property.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The advantages of abolishing intellectual property rights greatly outweigh the reasons not to, for instance it would massively enhance continuous development.Keypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abolish intellectual property rights because it discourages new ideas.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights harm creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abolish because it can be a very expensive process as well as being time consuming. there's also the issues of intellectual property rights being given to works that don't deserve it.Keypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be protected from having their ideas and other intellectual property stolen from them by big businesses.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A person uses his imagination and hard work to write as book or music. they should be able to benefit from their work. it should not be in the public domain.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If someone comes up with something on their own, no on else should have the right to try to profit or capitalize off of it. intellectual rights need to be protected.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights are useful as it helps protect people who have innovative products.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abolish intellectual property rights because an individuals should be able to keep the property they create solely for their own benefit and not the benefit of the whole world.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a person has worked hard to create a lyric, a song or a novel then it is only fair that they own their work and benefit financially from it.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights shouldn't be abolished because you won't have to worry about someone stealing your product and trying to pass it off as their ownKeypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abolish intellectual property rights because it is a personal ideas, people work hard on the things they created and it is just not right people just take it and make it their own sometimesKeypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we abolish these rights we remove incentive for innovation. people would have no guaranteed gains for creating intellectual propertyKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abolish intellectual property rights as the law is very complex and it is very easy to infringe copyright.Keypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If someone comes up with a cool idea or invention it's not fair for someone else to be able to steal itKeypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abolish intellectual property rights because everyone has the right to keep their creations or ideas all to themselves.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Art would probably be a lot better without intellectual property rightsKeypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to protect the rights of copyright holders to safeguard the creative economy and should never open the market for rampant exploitation of recognisable contentKeypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is essential that people who put effort into inventions should reap the rewards without their ideas being stolenKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without intellection property rights there is no incentive to research and develop new productsKeypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If abolished it will stiffle creativity and advancement because there will be no incentive if intellectual property is not a right.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights are useful as it helps protect people who have innovative products.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights allows their creators to receive incentives for their work.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights allow for competition between companies which often leads to positive results for consumersKeypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If you think of something first you don't want another person stealing that idea and profiting out of it.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abolish intellectual property rights because it mostly just helps the rich get richerKeypoint: Intellectual property rights are unfair", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is much financial gain at stake here, the right country or persons should be the ones who benefit not those who steal for their own greed.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If you think of something first you don't want another person stealing that idea and profiting out of it.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Maintaining intellectual property rights for all is too expensive, and maintaining these rights might restrict innovation in certain sectors.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights harm creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If an individual has created any property it is his to determine it's useKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without these protections innovation would decrease. no one would be willing to out in the time, effort and money into something that someone else could immediately rip off.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abolish intellectual property rights to break to the barriers if innovation, barring people from building on and improving ideas is counter productiveKeypoint: Intellectual property rights are ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights allows their creators to receive incentives for their work.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights are expensive to maintain and hold back the spread of new ideasKeypoint: Intellectual property rights are ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without intellection property rights there is no incentive to research and develop new productsKeypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights supports the idea of exclusivity to a concept or idea. limiting what others can do with a similar idea is not fair and should not be supported.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights waste money", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights are expensive to maintain and hold back the spread of new ideasKeypoint: Intellectual property rights harm creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Maintaining intellectual property rights for all is too expensive, and maintaining these rights might restrict innovation in certain sectors.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights waste money", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is only fair that a person or company that created something should have protections against those that want to make money off of another's hard work.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: I think that we shouldn't abolish intellectual property rights for their hard workKeypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Creators have the right to profit from their ideas.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights incentivize inventors to keep inventingKeypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should have intellectual property rights so a company can protect their ideas.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to protect the rights of copyright holders to safeguard the creative economy and should never open the market for rampant exploitation of recognisable contentKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without intellection property rights there is no incentive to research and develop new productsKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property is just as valid as a property that is concrete. its creator deserves to control these rights.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without ip rights, the market would be awash with cheap imitationsKeypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abolish intellectual property rights, they protect the creative works of every field, without them creators would have no ability to earn from their hard work since anyone could steal their ideasKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A person or business has a right to profit or use their own invention, idea, process etc without fearing someone stealing it.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Abolishing intellectual property rights will give people more access to informationKeypoint: Intellectual property restricts access to important information/products", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is much financial gain at stake here, the right country or persons should be the ones who benefit not those who steal for their own greed.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights mean that it is too expensive to access literature and music. abolishing these rights would make art more accessible to all.Keypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights shouldn't be abolished because you won't have to worry about someone stealing your product and trying to pass it off as their ownKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights should be protected to prevent ideas and inventive thinking from being stolen, used and/or manipulated by others, claim the intellectual property as their own.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Enforcing property rights is almost impossible when companies in numerous countries do not enforce the rules very well such as china etc so it is easier just to abolish themKeypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abolish intellectual property rights as they inhibit the creativity of artists who would use previous work for inspiration.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights harm creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't abolish intellectual property rights because everyone has the right to be creative with their thoughtsKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Eliminate intellectual property rights could lead to plagiarism at all levels of the artsKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights keep people from making needed improvements to ideas first thought of by someone else.Keypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abolish intellectual property rights because abolishing intellectual property rights of individuals would severely cripple the creativity necessary for achievements in many different areasKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights mean that access to the arts can be more expensive meaning that poorer people have less access than richer people.Keypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights protect someone's research and hard work ensuring that they can be recognized and recompensed for their efforts.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Ip rights safeguard medical advancement so other countries won't profit off of their discoveriesKeypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Creators have the right to profit from their ideas.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Abolishing intellectual property rights removes the financial incentive to innovation.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights stifle growth and information by stopping the free-flowing of ideas.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights harm creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights allow for competition between companies which often leads to positive results for consumersKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be protected from having their ideas and other intellectual property stolen from them by big businesses.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abolish intellectual property rights because it protects individuals rights to their discoveries and inventions.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights protects the ideas that will lead to a solid invention/investment and therefore need to be protected, not abolished.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban intellectual property rights because not everyone sees issue such as copyright in the same way. there can be loopholes which people abuse.Keypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abolish intellectual property rights because it protects individuals rights to their discoveries and inventions.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't abolish because intellectual property rights help the owners to protect their property and to keep their property from being stolen or replicated.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without intellectual property rights there would be little incentive for people to create as they would not make as much money. therefore a lot of art would not be created.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abolish intellectual property rights because that is someones idea and they should get credit for it.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Creative property is just as important as physical work and should be protectedKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is unfair if two people come up with something at the same time, that if one gets to the patent office first the other can't use their ideaKeypoint: Intellectual property rights are unfair", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights ensure that people or companies can make profits from what they have spent much time and effort in creating.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Maintaining intellectual property rights for all is too expensive, and maintaining these rights might restrict innovation in certain sectors.Keypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights stifle the widespread use of life enhancing technology so we should abolish them.Keypoint: Intellectual property restricts access to important information/products", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual properties allow large corporations to have monopolies over their products and restrict the free market.Keypoint: Intellectual property restricts access to important information/products", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abolish intellectual property rights as the law is very complex and it is very easy to infringe copyright.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights are ineffective", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abolish intellectual property rights because an individuals should be able to keep the property they create solely for their own benefit and not the benefit of the whole world.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we abolish intellectual property rights people will just stop trying to invent new ides because they won't get anything for their efforts.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be able to guarantee income from inventions to recover development costKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights keep people from stealing others' ideas and selling them as their own.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By abolishing these rights, the livelihood of the creators is severely threatened.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Somebody somewhere could get the same idea,song or something exactly the same which already been registered as intellectual property and will be unfair to them.Keypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to do away with intellectual property rights so it doesn't slow down innovationKeypoint: Intellectual property rights harm creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without intellectual property rights creative people may not be able to make a living from their creativity. their work may then be lost as they have to take on other paying professions.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without these protections innovation would decrease. no one would be willing to out in the time, effort and money into something that someone else could immediately rip off.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By abolishing these rights, the livelihood of the creators is severely threatened.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Having intellectual property rights hinders progress and stops other people developing and improving projectsKeypoint: Intellectual property rights are ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without intellectual property rights creative people may not be able to make a living from their creativity. their work may then be lost as they have to take on other paying professions.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should have intellectual property rights so a company can protect their ideas.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights can be granted to those who don't deserve protectionKeypoint: Intellectual property rights are unfair", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Keeping ip laws is better for creation and innovation. if ideas and products are not protected, people have less incentive to continue creating if someone else can replicate their idea immediately.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights protect those who have spent time and ingenuity on development of an idea and ensures they can be rewarded accordingly for their inspiration.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abolish intellectual property rights because people should get credit for their work.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights should be protected, as intellectual property is the same as physical property.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Somebody somewhere could get the same idea,song or something exactly the same which already been registered as intellectual property and will be unfair to them.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights are unfair", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If someone comes up with a cool idea or invention it's not fair for someone else to be able to steal itKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abolish intellectual property rights because people should get credit for their work.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Information should be freely available to allKeypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights incentivize inventors to keep inventingKeypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights are so important in that they don't allow someone to just steal someone else's ideas and creations for their own benefit.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights should not be legally enforced, because anyone who creates intellectual property has the obligation to share that creation with the world in order to help educate or edify others.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights are ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Art would probably be a lot better without intellectual property rightsKeypoint: Intellectual property rights harm creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without intellectual property rights creative people may not be able to make a living from their creativity. their work may then be lost as they have to take on other paying professions.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should have a right of ownership to their creations, ideas, and concepts that they created themselves.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Each person or institution owns their innovations, therefore they must be the owners of the income they generate and there must be intellectual property rights.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: An individual uses his thoughts to develop ideas which are then put into a book or song. that individual should be able to profit from his work.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights should be protected, as intellectual property is the same as physical property.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights keep people from stealing others' ideas and selling them as their own.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abolish intellectual property rights because it discourages new ideas.Keypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without these rights people would not spend for new discovery because others could immediately copy it without compensating for their investment.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abolish intellectual property rights because an individuals should be able to keep the property they create solely for their own benefit and not the benefit of the whole world.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't abolish because intellectual property rights help the owners to protect their property and to keep their property from being stolen or replicated.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights should not be legally enforced, because anyone who creates intellectual property has the obligation to share that creation with the world in order to help educate or edify others.Keypoint: Intellectual property restricts access to important information/products", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is only fair that a person or company that created something should have protections against those that want to make money off of another's hard work.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property is such a vague concept in many cases, to have a right to it stiffles others' creativity.Keypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights ensures ideas from originators are not stolen and used for profit.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abolish intellectual property rights because everyone has the right to keep their creations or ideas all to themselves.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Enforcing property rights is almost impossible when companies in numerous countries do not enforce the rules very well such as china etc so it is easier just to abolish themKeypoint: Intellectual property rights are ineffective", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Abolishing intellectual property rights would damage the economy since there would be less incentive to bring new and innovative products to marketKeypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without intellectual property rights, there would be little motivation to invent new things and future developments would grind to a halt.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights are so important in that they don't allow someone to just steal someone else's ideas and creations for their own benefit.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights allow a person to reap the rewards for having come up with and develop an innovative idea.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights allow a person to reap the rewards for having come up with and develop an innovative idea.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Keeping ip laws is better for creation and innovation. if ideas and products are not protected, people have less incentive to continue creating if someone else can replicate their idea immediately.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights prevent the stealing of others accomplishments and ideasKeypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We cannot abolish intellectual property rights because artists and scientists need to have their ideas and innovations protected so that they can earn a living in their fieldsKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights are so important in that they don't allow someone to just steal someone else's ideas and creations for their own benefit.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without intellection property rights there is no incentive to research and develop new productsKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Having intellectual property rights hinders progress and stops other people developing and improving projectsKeypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights hurt the flow of information.Keypoint: Intellectual property restricts access to important information/products", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights should be abolished as it limits competitions and innovation.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights harm creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights mean that access to the arts can be more expensive meaning that poorer people have less access than richer people.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights are unfair", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights should not be abolished as they provide security and protection to inventors to stop their hard work and financial investment being stolen and losing their just rewardsKeypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abolish intellectual property rights as people should be able to profit from the developments that they make.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People/companies will have worked hard, possibly for many years to develop research and product and spend a lot of money on these, they need to be able to recoup this money by keeping the products exclusive.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Ip rights safeguard medical advancement so other countries won't profit off of their discoveriesKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is essential that people who put effort into inventions should reap the rewards without their ideas being stolenKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be able to guarantee income from inventions to recover development costKeypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abolish intellectual property rights because it will make a fairer playing fieldKeypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Property is property, whether intellectual or physical and belongs to whoever created it. their rights should be protected.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights supports the idea of exclusivity to a concept or idea. limiting what others can do with a similar idea is not fair and should not be supported.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights are unfair", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is only fair that a person or company that created something should have protections against those that want to make money off of another's hard work.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abolish intellectual property rights because it protects that person's claim to their inventions and discoveries.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights should be abolished as it limits competitions and innovation.Keypoint: Intellectual property restricts access to important information/products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is much financial gain at stake here, the right country or persons should be the ones who benefit not those who steal for their own greed.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abolish intellectual property rights because it's not fair for people to steal a genius idea from someone elseKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights enable people to benefit from what they worked so hard to achieve.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights slows down the speed with which people have access to technology, goods and ideas that could transfrom their lives so should be abolished.Keypoint: Intellectual property restricts access to important information/products", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should have the right to own their own ideasKeypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights should be protected, as intellectual property is the same as physical property.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Property rights are essential as it encourages innovative thought and technological advances.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abolish intellectual property rights because once the property is put out there, everyone should have the right to use said property.Keypoint: Intellectual property restricts access to important information/products", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should have the right to own their own ideasKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Removing ip rights would cause a free for all and no one will have the incentive to do anything since it can just be taken by someone elseKeypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is no reason to abolish these rights because, if a person came up with an idea, they should get credit for itKeypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Creators have the right to profit from their ideas.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abolish intellectual property rights because it mostly just helps the rich get richerKeypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Ip should remain and/or be reformed, as they offer essential legal and commercial protections for the inventors or rights holders.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A song or writing are works of art and their creators should benefit from themKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights help secure people's rights to their income.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Ip rights safeguard medical advancement so other countries won't profit off of their discoveriesKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without these rights people would not spend for new discovery because others could immediately copy it without compensating for their investment.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to abolish intellectual property rights and let people innovate and create without having to worry about who owns whatKeypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should have the right to own their own ideasKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights are necessary to protect those who came up with better solutions and products, they are meant to give the clever more money to deal with new ideasKeypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Property rights are essential as it encourages innovative thought and technological advances.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need intellectual property rights to protect those who have invested so much in research and technology to develop new things.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If someone comes up with something on their own, no on else should have the right to try to profit or capitalize off of it. intellectual rights need to be protected.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If someone comes up with something on their own, no on else should have the right to try to profit or capitalize off of it. intellectual rights need to be protected.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People/companies will have worked hard, possibly for many years to develop research and product and spend a lot of money on these, they need to be able to recoup this money by keeping the products exclusive.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If someone invents something they should be able to profit from itKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights don't work. we see this with piracy websites as well as state actors such as china. there is no point in holding onto a broken system.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights are ineffective", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights prevent the stealing of others accomplishments and ideasKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights are expensive to maintain and hold back the spread of new ideasKeypoint: Intellectual property rights are unfair", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights incentivize inventors to keep inventingKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Ideas are free thoughts so it's not fair for one person to profit off of itKeypoint: Intellectual property rights are unfair", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abolish intellectual property rights as they inhibit the creativity of artists who would use previous work for inspiration.Keypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If you think of something first you don't want another person stealing that idea and profiting out of it.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights are important as it gives economic incentive for their creation and helps to stimulate innovation and contribute to the technological progress of countries.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights should not be abolished as they provide security and protection to inventors to stop their hard work and financial investment being stolen and losing their just rewardsKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we abolish intellectual property rights there is the fear of ideas being stolen.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abolish intellectual property rights to break to the barriers if innovation, barring people from building on and improving ideas is counter productiveKeypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban intellectual property rights because not everyone sees issue such as copyright in the same way. there can be loopholes which people abuse.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights are ineffective", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without intellectual property rights, the most innovative minds will have no motivation to come up with the best ideas.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If someone comes up with a cool idea or invention it's not fair for someone else to be able to steal itKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abolish intellectual property rights, they protect the creative works of every field, without them creators would have no ability to earn from their hard work since anyone could steal their ideasKeypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights stifle the widespread use of life enhancing technology so we should abolish them.Keypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Copyright laws protect artistic creations.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abolish intellectual property rights because it is a personal ideas, people work hard on the things they created and it is just not right people just take it and make it their own sometimesKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should get rid of these property rights because they take away from others ideas.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights harm creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without intellectual property rights, there would be little motivation to invent new things and future developments would grind to a halt.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Abolishing intellectual property rights would damage the economy since there would be less incentive to bring new and innovative products to marketKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights reduce the ability of people to engage with and reinterpret characters and stories and so make all of us poorer.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights are unfair", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights should be abolished because maintaining it can be very expensiveKeypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights should be abolished because maintaining it can be very expensiveKeypoint: Intellectual property rights waste money", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Abolishing intellectual property rights removes the financial incentive to innovation.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Ip should remain and/or be reformed, as they offer essential legal and commercial protections for the inventors or rights holders.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A person uses his imagination and hard work to write as book or music. they should be able to benefit from their work. it should not be in the public domain.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A person or business has a right to profit or use their own invention, idea, process etc without fearing someone stealing it.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Maintaining intellectual property rights for all is too expensive, and maintaining these rights might restrict innovation in certain sectors.Keypoint: Intellectual property restricts access to important information/products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we abolish the rights, then companies will stop developing products and ideas as they will know that there is no way they can make back the cost of r&d and so will run at lossesKeypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights ensures ideas from originators are not stolen and used for profit.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abolish intellectual property rights as they protect the income of people who need them to make a living.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Property rights are essential as it encourages innovative thought and technological advances.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights are what protects an individual who earns his living from that workKeypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights should not be abolished because the work of an individual or company is their work to ownKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights ensures ideas from originators are not stolen and used for profit.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights benefit the big corporations more than individuals as they can spend millions creating and patenting ideas which just makes them more powerfulKeypoint: Intellectual property rights are unfair", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abolish intellectual property rights because it protects that person's claim to their inventions and discoveries.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property is such a vague concept in many cases, to have a right to it stiffles others' creativity.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights harm creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights should not be abolished because the work of an individual or company is their work to ownKeypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights hurt the flow of information.Keypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Maintaining intellectual property rights can be expensiveKeypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Eliminate intellectual property rights could lead to plagiarism at all levels of the artsKeypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is essential that people who put effort into inventions should reap the rewards without their ideas being stolenKeypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights are a barrier to innovation and further improvements to an idea by blocking others capitalising on ideas and technologyKeypoint: Intellectual property restricts access to important information/products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: I think that we shouldn't abolish intellectual property rights because respect to the authorKeypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People working hard to invite something and should be awarded for it.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Each person or institution owns their innovations, therefore they must be the owners of the income they generate and there must be intellectual property rights.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we abolish these rights we remove incentive for innovation. people would have no guaranteed gains for creating intellectual propertyKeypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abolish because it can be a very expensive process as well as being time consuming. there's also the issues of intellectual property rights being given to works that don't deserve it.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights waste money", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without ip rights, the market would be awash with cheap imitationsKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual properties allow large corporations to have monopolies over their products and restrict the free market.Keypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights help secure people's rights to their income.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When a person creates a type of intellectual property, he has the right to own that property and dictate the use of it, since he is the one who made the effort to make that property.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Companies invest billions into research, if there are no rights it would dissuade companies from conducting research in the first place.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights are what protects an individual who earns his living from that workKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't abolish intellectual property rights because everyone has the right to be creative with their thoughtsKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights limit creativity and put too much power in the hands of corporations which have the resources to crush the liberty of people who innocently re-post content.Keypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: An individual uses his thoughts to develop ideas which are then put into a book or song. that individual should be able to profit from his work.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is just too hard to enforce & not worth the time & moneyKeypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abolish intellectual property rights as they protect the income of people who need them to make a living.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without intellectual property rights there would be little incentive for people to create as they would not make as much money. therefore a lot of art would not be created.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should get rid of these property rights because they take away from others ideas.Keypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights allow for competition between companies which often leads to positive results for consumersKeypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights don't work. we see this with piracy websites as well as state actors such as china. there is no point in holding onto a broken system.Keypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People working hard to invite something and should be awarded for it.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We must not abolish the right of intellectual property, people strive hard to create and this must be recognized and protected.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Somebody was working hard to make something and then should be rewarded for it. that`s what intellectual property rights all about.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights slows down the speed with which people have access to technology, goods and ideas that could transfrom their lives so should be abolished.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights are ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights protect those who have spent time and ingenuity on development of an idea and ensures they can be rewarded accordingly for their inspiration.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Property is property, whether intellectual or physical and belongs to whoever created it. their rights should be protected.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights can be granted to those who don't deserve protectionKeypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Creative property is just as important as physical work and should be protectedKeypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Ideas are free thoughts so it's not fair for one person to profit off of itKeypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be able to guarantee income from inventions to recover development costKeypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If someone invents something they should be able to profit from itKeypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights provide an important incententive for innovation and development of new products which if lost would harm the economyKeypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual rights are important because they provide incentives for those who do artistic or research workKeypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It keeps others from infringing on patented ideasKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be protected from having their ideas and other intellectual property stolen from them by big businesses.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property is just as valid as a property that is concrete. its creator deserves to control these rights.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights stifle growth and information by stopping the free-flowing of ideas.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights are ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't abolish because intellectual property rights help the owners to protect their property and to keep their property from being stolen or replicated.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Keeping ip laws is better for creation and innovation. if ideas and products are not protected, people have less incentive to continue creating if someone else can replicate their idea immediately.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights enable people to benefit from what they worked so hard to achieve.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a person has worked hard to create a lyric, a song or a novel then it is only fair that they own their work and benefit financially from it.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abolish intellectual property rights because it can get very expensiveKeypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should have a right of ownership to their creations, ideas, and concepts that they created themselves.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights should be abolished as there is no real evidence that someone thought of something first and they should not profit in perpetuity from someone else using their claimed knowledge.Keypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abolish intellectual property rights because it's not fair for people to steal a genius idea from someone elseKeypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It keeps others from infringing on patented ideasKeypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Ip should remain and/or be reformed, as they offer essential legal and commercial protections for the inventors or rights holders.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: I think that we shouldn't abolish intellectual property rights because respect to the authorKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Companies invest billions into research, if there are no rights it would dissuade companies from conducting research in the first place.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should abolish intellectual property rights because it will make a fairer playing fieldKeypoint: Intellectual property rights are unfair", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It keeps others from infringing on patented ideasKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need intellectual property rights to protect those who have invested so much in research and technology to develop new things.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to abolish intellectual property rights and let people innovate and create without having to worry about who owns whatKeypoint: Intellectual property rights harm creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't abolish intellectual property rights because everyone has the right to be creative with their thoughtsKeypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights benefit the big corporations more than individuals as they can spend millions creating and patenting ideas which just makes them more powerfulKeypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Somebody was working hard to make something and then should be rewarded for it. that`s what intellectual property rights all about.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abolish intellectual property rights because that is someones idea and they should get credit for it.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we abolish the rights, then companies will stop developing products and ideas as they will know that there is no way they can make back the cost of r&d and so will run at lossesKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Maintaining intellectual property rights can be expensiveKeypoint: Intellectual property rights waste money", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights are necessary to protect those who came up with better solutions and products, they are meant to give the clever more money to deal with new ideasKeypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is just too hard to enforce & not worth the time & moneyKeypoint: Intellectual property rights waste money", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights are important as it gives economic incentive for their creation and helps to stimulate innovation and contribute to the technological progress of countries.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights should be protected to prevent ideas and inventive thinking from being stolen, used and/or manipulated by others, claim the intellectual property as their own.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abolish intellectual property rights as people should be able to profit from the developments that they make.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is much financial gain at stake here, the right country or persons should be the ones who benefit not those who steal for their own greed.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights are useful as it helps protect people who have innovative products.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A person or business has a right to profit or use their own invention, idea, process etc without fearing someone stealing it.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights reduce the ability of people to engage with and reinterpret characters and stories and so make all of us poorer.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights harm creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights are a barrier to innovation and further improvements to an idea by blocking others capitalising on ideas and technologyKeypoint: Intellectual property rights harm creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We must not abolish the right of intellectual property, people strive hard to create and this must be recognized and protected.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without intellectual property rights, the most innovative minds will have no motivation to come up with the best ideas.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights reduce the ability of people to engage with and reinterpret characters and stories and so make all of us poorer.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights are ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If an individual has created any property it is his to determine it's useKeypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Information should be freely available to allKeypoint: Intellectual property restricts access to important information/products", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a person has worked hard to create a lyric, a song or a novel then it is only fair that they own their work and benefit financially from it.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is unfair if two people come up with something at the same time, that if one gets to the patent office first the other can't use their ideaKeypoint: Intellectual property prevents the continuous improvement of a service/product", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abolish intellectual property rights because abolishing intellectual property rights of individuals would severely cripple the creativity necessary for achievements in many different areasKeypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Companies and individuals spend a long time often even years developing services and products , they will have spent a lot of their own money too and need the chance to recoup this.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights should be abolished as there is no real evidence that someone thought of something first and they should not profit in perpetuity from someone else using their claimed knowledge.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights are unfair", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abolish intellectual property rights because abolishing intellectual property rights of individuals would severely cripple the creativity necessary for achievements in many different areasKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We must not abolish the right of intellectual property, people strive hard to create and this must be recognized and protected.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We cannot abolish intellectual property rights because artists and scientists need to have their ideas and innovations protected so that they can earn a living in their fieldsKeypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we abolish intellectual property rights people will just stop trying to invent new ides because they won't get anything for their efforts.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Abolishing intellectual property rights removes the financial incentive to innovation.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights limit creativity and put too much power in the hands of corporations which have the resources to crush the liberty of people who innocently re-post content.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights harm creativity/innovation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Intellectual property rights supports the idea of exclusivity to a concept or idea. limiting what others can do with a similar idea is not fair and should not be supported.Keypoint: Intellectual property rights are ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Companies and individuals spend a long time often even years developing services and products , they will have spent a lot of their own money too and need the chance to recoup this.Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we abolish these rights we remove incentive for innovation. people would have no guaranteed gains for creating intellectual propertyKeypoint: Intellectual property rights incentivize investment in developing new products", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - } - ] -} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/tasks/task1290_kpa_keypoint_matching_atheism_topic.json b/tasks/task1290_kpa_keypoint_matching_atheism_topic.json deleted file mode 100644 index 2e27c5efe..000000000 --- a/tasks/task1290_kpa_keypoint_matching_atheism_topic.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,1569 +0,0 @@ -{ - "Contributors": [ - "Arjun Ashok" - ], - "Source": [ - "ArgKP (https://github.com/IBM/KPA_2021_shared_task)" - ], - "Definition": "The input contains an argument and a keypoint on the topic \"We should adopt atheism\", separated by \"\".Your task is to answer if the keypoint matches the argument and summarizes exactly what the argument means, in the context of this topic.", - "Categories": [ - "Classification -> Verification -> Summary Verification", - "Text Comparison" - ], - "Domains": [ - "Reviews", - "World Religions", - "Dialogue" - ], - "Input_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Output_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Instruction_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Positive Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt atheism because religion is the root of all the wars that have happened and would stop so much fighting in th world.Keypoint: Religions are immoral and people should not follow them", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that we should adopt atheism because religion is the root of all the wars that have happened and would stop so much fighting in th world." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without belief in a god, what is to stop people from being immoral and treating others poorly?Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that without belief in a god, what is to stop people from being immoral and treating others poorly?" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism is based on factual informationKeypoint: Atheism is beneficial to the person that adopts it", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that atheism is based on factual information" - } - ], - "Negative Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: There are many religious beliefs and turning to atheism would deny people's right to the freedom of religion, therefore atheism should not be adopted.Keypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that there are many religious beliefs and turning to atheism would deny people's right to the freedom of religion, therefore atheism should not be adopted." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Switching to a belief system based on logic and provable fact would be much better for us as a society.Keypoint: Religions are immoral and people should not follow them", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that switching to a belief system based on logic and provable fact would be much better for us as a society." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Wherever there's strong religious beliefs there's hatred of other religions, war and killing, the world would be a much better and safer place if we all started adopting atheism.Keypoint: Atheism is beneficial to the person that adopts it", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that wherever there's strong religious beliefs there's hatred of other religions, war and killing, the world would be a much better and safer place if we all started adopting atheism." - } - ], - "Instances": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Freedom to choose a religion is a human rightKeypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism should be the defacto stance as it is the only provable observance of reality, in that there is absolutely no evidence to prove the contrary.Keypoint: Atheism should be adopted since we cannot prove that god exists", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: No one has ever been able to prove that god exists. religions convince people of a higher power to get them into church for their own profit,Keypoint: Atheism should be adopted since we cannot prove that god exists", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People are so afraid of an imaginary punishment that they do not live their lives to the fullest - with atheism, it will be more convincing to live in the present.Keypoint: Atheism should be adopted since we cannot prove that god exists", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Religion encourages togetherness and a sense of community amongst adherents, and this unity would be lost with atheism, which is essentially an isolationist, negative and blinkered approach to life.Keypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is ridiculous to believe in god with so much scientific anti-proofKeypoint: Science can adequately explain the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Religion is used to control and manipulate peopleKeypoint: Religions are immoral and people should not follow them", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism would be against our right to religious freedom.Keypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism is fomenting debauchery and bad habits in societyKeypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism should be the defacto standard for all people. if individuals choose to believe in unprovable, invisible super beings from space, it should be kept private and out of official/public spaces.Keypoint: Atheism should be adopted since we cannot prove that god exists", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Religious freedom is a right for everybody to worship what god they see fit in the manner they wish and atheism removes this, as well as introducing resentment of governmentKeypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The constitution guarantees freedom of religionKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Adopting atheism is not for everyone as it can eliminate one's moral principles, tradition, and cultural beliefs.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There would be a decrease in morals and moralityKeypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be able to believe whatever they want and not be forced into atheism.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: I think that we shouldn't adopt atheism because is free religionKeypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt atheism because religions form the basis of the moral code by which we live byKeypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism should not be adopted as it doesn't make people accountable for their actionsKeypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheists encourage debauchery and bad habitsKeypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism is godless and fundamentally lacking in a coherent moral compass, therefore it should not be adopted.Keypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be free to practice whatever beliefs they want. you can not force a particular religion or atheism on everyone. atheism is in direct conflict to the majority of society's deeply held beliefs.Keypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: No one belief system should be adopted or endorsed, it is entirely a personal decision that should be kept private.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt atheism because religions form the basis of the moral code by which we live byKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism is fomenting debauchery and bad habits in societyKeypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt atheism because in this country it's a right to practice religion and to believe in god if you so choose.Keypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheists encourage debauchery and bad habitsKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many of the most horrendous acts by humanity has been done in the name of religion, the world would be a more peaceful place if we all adopted atheism.Keypoint: Science can adequately explain the universe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism is the way to go away from religion conflictsKeypoint: Atheism is beneficial to the person that adopts it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism should be adopted as it will put an end to organized religions which have caused wars and deaths over the centuries.Keypoint: Atheism is beneficial to the person that adopts it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If people believe there is a god the state should not stop them from practising their faithKeypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism denies years of worship carried on through generationsKeypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt atheism because it gives the freedom from being bound by a religion and their rulesKeypoint: Atheism should be adopted since we cannot prove that god exists", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is against basic freedom rights to impose atheism upon everybodyKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: While there are many atheists in the world, there are many that believe in god or a higher power and don't want to see atheism as an adopted practice.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be free to practice whatever beliefs they want. you can not force a particular religion or atheism on everyone. atheism is in direct conflict to the majority of society's deeply held beliefs.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Religion encourages togetherness and a sense of community amongst adherents, and this unity would be lost with atheism, which is essentially an isolationist, negative and blinkered approach to life.Keypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Religions around the world provide the basis of the moral code by which most people live their livesKeypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Adopting atheism is not for everyone as it can eliminate one's moral principles, tradition, and cultural beliefs.Keypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Religion has been the cause of countless wars so adopting atheism would put a stop to religion based conflict.Keypoint: Religions are immoral and people should not follow them", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: You can not force a religion or lack there of on someoneKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt atheism, there is not one piece of evidence for religion being fact, yet science is proven. religion is a manipulative tactic based on lies.Keypoint: Science can adequately explain the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Adopting atheism would violate freedom of religionKeypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Adopting atheism infringes upon people's first amendment right to freedom of religion.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism would be against our right to religious freedom.Keypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt atheism because science can explain how we got here without needing a god to explain it.Keypoint: Atheism is beneficial to the person that adopts it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Freedom to choose a religion is a human rightKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People have the freedom to religion and forcing them to chose a non religious entity is unconstitutional.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we adopt atheism then maybe people will start believing in the scientific community again.Keypoint: Atheism is beneficial to the person that adopts it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldnt adopt atheism everyone is entitled to their beliefs and values living in a multi cultural society we should accept people for who they areKeypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is unfair to mandate a belief system even if it is an \"un-belief\" like atheism.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People have the freedom to religion and forcing them to chose a non religious entity is unconstitutional.Keypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be allowed to choose how to believe freely and not forced to accept the beliefs of atheism. each person has a mind and can make their own decision and should be allowed the freedom of choice.Keypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism does not account for our moral values and in fact undermines them when people begin to believe that morality is relativistic and might makes right when people put themselves first.Keypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many people use religion to connect with their family as well as loved ones that are no longer alive - losing this comforting connection would be devastating for some.Keypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without belief in a god, what is to stop people from being immoral and treating others poorly?Keypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The right to practice religion is a personal freedom that cannot be taken away as it is a source of comfort to many.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The belief in god promotes kindness and love towards our fellow man. by taking this away we would be making a less compassionate world who has no regard for their fellow man.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is no actual proof that god exists. it is all stories passed down no matter which religion. atheism would stop the fighting over which religion is superior.Keypoint: Atheism is beneficial to the person that adopts it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we adopt atheism then maybe people will start believing in the scientific community again.Keypoint: Science can adequately explain the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt atheism as people should be allowed to retain their own religions or belief systems as they see fit.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be free to follow their own faith and it should not be a government decision.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many of the most horrendous acts by humanity has been done in the name of religion, the world would be a more peaceful place if we all adopted atheism.Keypoint: Atheism should be adopted since we cannot prove that god exists", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt atheism because religion is the root of all the wars that have happened and would stop so much fighting in th world.Keypoint: Atheism is beneficial to the person that adopts it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Freedom of religion is a fundamental rightKeypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt atheism because we can not prove that deities really do exist.Keypoint: Atheism should be adopted since we cannot prove that god exists", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Adopting atheism would be a way to isolate and be against religions and it does not seem rightKeypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: No one belief system should be adopted or endorsed, it is entirely a personal decision that should be kept private.Keypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt atheism as people have the right to believe the way they want when it come to a higher power.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Religion is used to control and manipulate peopleKeypoint: Atheism should be adopted since we cannot prove that god exists", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt atheism because organized religion instills good morals into people.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt atheism because we can not prove that deities really do exist.Keypoint: Atheism is beneficial to the person that adopts it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt atheism because people have a right to believe what ever they wantKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism does not account for our moral values and in fact undermines them when people begin to believe that morality is relativistic and might makes right when people put themselves first.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Anyone is entitled to believe in whatever they want, god or no godKeypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Adopting atheism would violate freedom of religionKeypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is still no proof of god so why not adopt atheism.Keypoint: Atheism is beneficial to the person that adopts it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Adopting atheism infringes upon people's first amendment right to freedom of religion.Keypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People are entitled to believe in any god that they choose to believe in. as religion offers comfort, aatheism should not be adopted.Keypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Religion is used to control and manipulate peopleKeypoint: Science can adequately explain the universe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't adopt atheism because it goes against the right to free religious beliefKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Adopting atheism takes away the freedom of worship that people are promised in this country.Keypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Religious freedom is a right for everybody to worship what god they see fit in the manner they wish and atheism removes this, as well as introducing resentment of governmentKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism fosters intellectual and human development and we must adopt itKeypoint: Atheism should be adopted since we cannot prove that god exists", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If everyone was an atheist they could enjoy life without fear of judgement in the afterlife and live more happily and worry free.Keypoint: Atheism should be adopted since we cannot prove that god exists", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If people believe there is a god the state should not stop them from practising their faithKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We cannot adopt atheism because it's not enforceable. people will believe what they want and no regulation will change their hearts.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt atheism as government should not be able to dictate people's religious freedom.Keypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism fosters the negative values of human beingsKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Adopting atheism would be a way to isolate and be against religions and it does not seem rightKeypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism disregards the majority of people that hold faith dear to their lives and adopting atheism would put so many people of faith at a discriminatory level.Keypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There would be a decrease in morals and moralityKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many people use religion to connect with their family as well as loved ones that are no longer alive - losing this comforting connection would be devastating for some.Keypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should never adopt atheism because it removes a sense of purpose in people. if they believe there is no purpose to life and no afterlife, it removes the incentive for them to behave positivelyKeypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The belief in god promotes kindness and love towards our fellow man. by taking this away we would be making a less compassionate world who has no regard for their fellow man.Keypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism will destroy the world by unleashing godless people running the government with no morals or ethics and should not be adopted.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Religions around the world provide the basis of the moral code by which most people live their livesKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is no true god therefore atheism is the way forwardKeypoint: Atheism should be adopted since we cannot prove that god exists", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't adopt atheism because it can scare people away from religion.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is no way to legislate people's religious faithKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is ridiculous to believe in god with so much scientific anti-proofKeypoint: Atheism is beneficial to the person that adopts it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt atheism, religion is hugely important to many people. it can provide them with many positive influences including purpose, morals, guidance, and comfort in the hardest of times.Keypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not force our religious beliefs, or lack thereof, onto other people with their own autonomy.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should have the freedom to believe in a way of their choice. atheism forces people to believe in one way and this is not the principle of freedom the usa was founded upon.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be able to believe whatever they want and not be forced into atheism.Keypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should have the right to worship the religion they believe inKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We are a free country and are allowed to believe in our god if we want to. adopting a non-belief goes against the ability to choose our religion and that goes against the founding of our country.Keypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism should not be adopted as it doesn't make people accountable for their actionsKeypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't adopt atheism for the free religion of the peopleKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldnt adopt atheism everyone is entitled to their beliefs and values living in a multi cultural society we should accept people for who they areKeypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism is a concept to adopt because no religions can be substantiated. without proof we are perpetuating a myth.Keypoint: Atheism is beneficial to the person that adopts it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism disregards the majority of people that hold faith dear to their lives and adopting atheism would put so many people of faith at a discriminatory level.Keypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People cannot simply be forced to abandon their religious beliefs and practices that guide their daily lives and provide comfort.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Adopting atheism takes away the freedom of worship that people are promised in this country.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt atheism because organized religion instills good morals into people.Keypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Freedom to choose what someone believes in is a rightKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't adopt atheism because it goes against the right to free religious beliefKeypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt atheism because science can explain how we got here without needing a god to explain it.Keypoint: Science can adequately explain the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Religious freedom is a fundamental right and should not be overridden by non religious people dictating that atheism is the way forward.Keypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism is based on factual informationKeypoint: Religions are immoral and people should not follow them", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism is in collision with any religion so as that should never be adopted.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldnt adopt atheism everyone is entitled to their beliefs and values living in a multi cultural society we should accept people for who they areKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The right to practice religion is a personal freedom that cannot be taken away as it is a source of comfort to many.Keypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism is the way to go away from religion conflictsKeypoint: Religions are immoral and people should not follow them", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If everyone was an atheist they could enjoy life without fear of judgement in the afterlife and live more happily and worry free.Keypoint: Atheism is beneficial to the person that adopts it", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt atheism because you can live your life freely without the worry of being judged by godKeypoint: Religions are immoral and people should not follow them", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Religion is the moral center of many culturesKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt atheism because religions form the basis of the moral code by which we live byKeypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism is in collision with any religion so as that should never be adopted.Keypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: While there are many atheists in the world, there are many that believe in god or a higher power and don't want to see atheism as an adopted practice.Keypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism can lead to amoral behavior as there is no code of ethics or religious guidance to live byKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: No belief or religion should be instituted in a blanket form. people are completely different with very different beliefs. no one way is good for everyone. there should be freedom to believe whatever one wants.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Religious freedom is a fundamental right and should not be overridden by non religious people dictating that atheism is the way forward.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt atheism because in this country it's a right to practice religion and to believe in god if you so choose.Keypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt atheism because people have a right to believe what ever they wantKeypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism fosters intellectual and human development and we must adopt itKeypoint: Atheism is beneficial to the person that adopts it", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Everyone has a right to follow the religion they truly believe, therefore we cannot impose atheismKeypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Everyone should adopt atheism because we have moved away from ancient times and explanations for our existance and science can explain how the universe came to be.Keypoint: Science can adequately explain the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism can lead to amoral behavior as there is no code of ethics or religious guidance to live byKeypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism is in collision with any religion so as that should never be adopted.Keypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism is fomenting debauchery and bad habits in societyKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt atheism as people have the right to believe the way they want when it come to a higher power.Keypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Religions around the world provide the basis of the moral code by which most people live their livesKeypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism offends the beliefs of most people. no one should be forced to deny their belief in godKeypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Religion has been the underlying cause of thousands of conflicts over the years and many hundreds of thousands of deaths, the only way to prevent this is for everyone to adopt atheism.Keypoint: Atheism is beneficial to the person that adopts it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We are a free country and are allowed to believe in our god if we want to. adopting a non-belief goes against the ability to choose our religion and that goes against the founding of our country.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt atheism because it would go against all other religionsKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt atheism as many people still follow a religion and find it a source of comfort, support and community. it is also an individuals right to choose whether they follow a religion.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt atheism because it would go against all other religionsKeypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism offends the beliefs of most people. no one should be forced to deny their belief in godKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism should be the defacto stance as it is the only provable observance of reality, in that there is absolutely no evidence to prove the contrary.Keypoint: Atheism is beneficial to the person that adopts it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism fosters the negative values of human beingsKeypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt atheism, religion is hugely important to many people. it can provide them with many positive influences including purpose, morals, guidance, and comfort in the hardest of times.Keypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt atheism because you can live your life freely without the worry of being judged by godKeypoint: Science can adequately explain the universe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The most basic right we have is freedom of religion, and it is very strong personal belief. atheism strips that away and should not be encouraged.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Religious freedom is a fundamental right and should not be overridden by non religious people dictating that atheism is the way forward.Keypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be allowed to choose how to believe freely and not forced to accept the beliefs of atheism. each person has a mind and can make their own decision and should be allowed the freedom of choice.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is no actual proof that god exists. it is all stories passed down no matter which religion. atheism would stop the fighting over which religion is superior.Keypoint: Atheism should be adopted since we cannot prove that god exists", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People are guided by religion on how to conduct their live and its been around for thousands of yearsKeypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People have the freedom to choose any religion, atheism should not be forced upon peopleKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is still no proof of god so why not adopt atheism.Keypoint: Atheism should be adopted since we cannot prove that god exists", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt atheism until someone can prove there is a god.Keypoint: Atheism should be adopted since we cannot prove that god exists", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People have the freedom to choose any religion, atheism should not be forced upon peopleKeypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: One of the most basic human rights is the freedom of religion, and asking anyone to give up that right to believe in whatever they choose is wrong.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Too many people fight and cause wars through religion so it should be banned in favour of atheismKeypoint: Religions are immoral and people should not follow them", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There would be a decrease in morals and moralityKeypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: I think that we shouldn't adopt atheism because is free religionKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Religion and the belief in god gives us comfort and allows us to face our own mortality, it is something we as humans need to maintain a healthy mind. atheism lacks this and should not be adopted.Keypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Forcing any religion, even atheism on people violates their freedom of religionKeypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Everyone should adopt atheism because we have moved away from ancient times and explanations for our existance and science can explain how the universe came to be.Keypoint: Atheism is beneficial to the person that adopts it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt atheist because this america and we should be free to have our own beliefsKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt atheism because it would go against all other religionsKeypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt atheism because it gives the freedom from being bound by a religion and their rulesKeypoint: Atheism is beneficial to the person that adopts it", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People are entitled to believe in any god that they choose to believe in. as religion offers comfort, aatheism should not be adopted.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The belief in god promotes kindness and love towards our fellow man. by taking this away we would be making a less compassionate world who has no regard for their fellow man.Keypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Forcing any religion, even atheism on people violates their freedom of religionKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should have the right to choose what they want to believe.Keypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheists have much lower stress levels because they do not constantly feel guilty about not living up to religious standardsKeypoint: Atheism should be adopted since we cannot prove that god exists", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People have the right to choose any religion they with, atheism should not be forced upon them.Keypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't adopt atheism for the free religion of the peopleKeypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People have the right to choose any religion they with, atheism should not be forced upon them.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt atheism because organized religion instills good morals into people.Keypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't adopt atheism because it can scare people away from religion.Keypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Religion is the moral center of many culturesKeypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People cannot simply be forced to abandon their religious beliefs and practices that guide their daily lives and provide comfort.Keypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People are guided by religion on how to conduct their live and its been around for thousands of yearsKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt atheism, there is not one piece of evidence for religion being fact, yet science is proven. religion is a manipulative tactic based on lies.Keypoint: Atheism is beneficial to the person that adopts it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism will destroy the world by unleashing godless people running the government with no morals or ethics and should not be adopted.Keypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism should be adopted as it will put an end to organized religions which have caused wars and deaths over the centuries.Keypoint: Religions are immoral and people should not follow them", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Too many people fight and cause wars through religion so it should be banned in favour of atheismKeypoint: Atheism is beneficial to the person that adopts it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Adopting atheism would be a way to isolate and be against religions and it does not seem rightKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: You can not force a religion or lack there of on someoneKeypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Freedom of religion is a fundamental rightKeypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should have the right to choose what they want to believe.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are many religious beliefs and turning to atheism would deny people's right to the freedom of religion, therefore atheism should not be adopted.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Freedom of religion is a fundamental rightKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without belief in a god, what is to stop people from being immoral and treating others poorly?Keypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Religion causes nothing but disagreement and warKeypoint: Atheism is beneficial to the person that adopts it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Everyone has a right to believe in anything and follow the religion they think it's most suited for them, so we cannot impose atheismKeypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism is a concept to adopt because no religions can be substantiated. without proof we are perpetuating a myth.Keypoint: Atheism should be adopted since we cannot prove that god exists", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism should be the defacto standard for all people. if individuals choose to believe in unprovable, invisible super beings from space, it should be kept private and out of official/public spaces.Keypoint: Atheism is beneficial to the person that adopts it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: No one has ever been able to prove that god exists. religions convince people of a higher power to get them into church for their own profit,Keypoint: Atheism is beneficial to the person that adopts it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism does not account for our moral values and in fact undermines them when people begin to believe that morality is relativistic and might makes right when people put themselves first.Keypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Adopting atheism will help to end senseless wars that are based on religionKeypoint: Religions are immoral and people should not follow them", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Religion causes nothing but disagreement and warKeypoint: Religions are immoral and people should not follow them", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Adopting one religion or another is a free choice of each human being, each person adapts the belief they want and knowsKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many of the most horrendous acts by humanity has been done in the name of religion, the world would be a more peaceful place if we all adopted atheism.Keypoint: Religions are immoral and people should not follow them", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People are so afraid of an imaginary punishment that they do not live their lives to the fullest - with atheism, it will be more convincing to live in the present.Keypoint: Atheism is beneficial to the person that adopts it", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt atheism until someone can prove there is a god.Keypoint: Atheism is beneficial to the person that adopts it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't adopt atheism because it can scare people away from religion.Keypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Everyone has a right to follow the religion they truly believe, therefore we cannot impose atheismKeypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is no true god therefore atheism is the way forwardKeypoint: Atheism is beneficial to the person that adopts it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism would be against our right to religious freedom.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Religion has been the underlying cause of thousands of conflicts over the years and many hundreds of thousands of deaths, the only way to prevent this is for everyone to adopt atheism.Keypoint: Religions are immoral and people should not follow them", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism denies years of worship carried on through generationsKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt atheism because in this country it's a right to practice religion and to believe in god if you so choose.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: All beliefs should be recognized not just the one you want.Keypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People are guided by religion on how to conduct their live and its been around for thousands of yearsKeypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If people were not allowed to practice their own beliefs then mental health issues would rise exponentially.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism is a concept to adopt because no religions can be substantiated. without proof we are perpetuating a myth.Keypoint: Religions are immoral and people should not follow them", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Adopting atheism would violate freedom of religionKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Everyone has a right to follow the religion they truly believe, therefore we cannot impose atheismKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism is godless and fundamentally lacking in a coherent moral compass, therefore it should not be adopted.Keypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Religion encourages togetherness and a sense of community amongst adherents, and this unity would be lost with atheism, which is essentially an isolationist, negative and blinkered approach to life.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is ridiculous to believe in god with so much scientific anti-proofKeypoint: Religions are immoral and people should not follow them", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Anyone is entitled to believe in whatever they want, god or no godKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism is godless and fundamentally lacking in a coherent moral compass, therefore it should not be adopted.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Adopting atheism will help to end senseless wars that are based on religionKeypoint: Atheism is beneficial to the person that adopts it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Religion has been the cause of countless wars so adopting atheism would put a stop to religion based conflict.Keypoint: Atheism is beneficial to the person that adopts it", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: No one belief should be forced onto everyone and therefore everyone adopting atheism is wrong.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheists have much lower stress levels because they do not constantly feel guilty about not living up to religious standardsKeypoint: Atheism is beneficial to the person that adopts it", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: All beliefs should be recognized not just the one you want.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism disregards the majority of people that hold faith dear to their lives and adopting atheism would put so many people of faith at a discriminatory level.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Everyone should adopt atheism because we have moved away from ancient times and explanations for our existance and science can explain how the universe came to be.Keypoint: Religions are immoral and people should not follow them", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Wherever there's strong religious beliefs there's hatred of other religions, war and killing, the world would be a much better and safer place if we all started adopting atheism.Keypoint: Religions are immoral and people should not follow them", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many people use religion to connect with their family as well as loved ones that are no longer alive - losing this comforting connection would be devastating for some.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism should not be adopted as it doesn't make people accountable for their actionsKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Everyone has a right to believe in anything and follow the religion they think it's most suited for them, so we cannot impose atheismKeypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheists encourage debauchery and bad habitsKeypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt atheism because you can live your life freely without the worry of being judged by godKeypoint: Atheism is beneficial to the person that adopts it", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism is based on factual informationKeypoint: Science can adequately explain the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism denies years of worship carried on through generationsKeypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt atheism since anyone should be free to believe anything they want. following a religion helps many people try to be better people.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The most basic right we have is freedom of religion, and it is very strong personal belief. atheism strips that away and should not be encouraged.Keypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism will destroy the world by unleashing godless people running the government with no morals or ethics and should not be adopted.Keypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt atheism as government should not be able to dictate people's religious freedom.Keypoint: Atheism lacks morality", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Adopting atheism takes away the freedom of worship that people are promised in this country.Keypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism fosters the negative values of human beingsKeypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be free to follow their own faith and it should not be a government decision.Keypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: No one belief system should be adopted or endorsed, it is entirely a personal decision that should be kept private.Keypoint: People should choose for themselves whether atheism should be adopted", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: One of the most basic human rights is the freedom of religion, and asking anyone to give up that right to believe in whatever they choose is wrong.Keypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Atheism can lead to amoral behavior as there is no code of ethics or religious guidance to live byKeypoint: Atheism discriminates against religious people / violates freedom of religion", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - } - ] -} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/tasks/task1291_kpa_keypoint_matching_libertarianism_topic.json b/tasks/task1291_kpa_keypoint_matching_libertarianism_topic.json deleted file mode 100644 index 9b101d3ea..000000000 --- a/tasks/task1291_kpa_keypoint_matching_libertarianism_topic.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2098 +0,0 @@ -{ - "Contributors": [ - "Arjun Ashok" - ], - "Source": [ - "ArgKP (https://github.com/IBM/KPA_2021_shared_task)" - ], - "Definition": "The input contains an argument and a keypoint on the topic \"We should adopt libertarianism\", separated by \"\".Your task is to answer if the keypoint matches the argument and summarizes exactly what the argument means, in the context of this topic.", - "Categories": [ - "Classification -> Verification -> Summary Verification", - "Text Comparison" - ], - "Domains": [ - "Reviews", - "Philosophy", - "Government and Politics", - "Dialogue" - ], - "Input_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Output_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Instruction_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Positive Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: It is much better for people to act as individuals because it encourages business enterprise, libertarianism is essentialKeypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that it is much better for people to act as individuals because it encourages business enterprise, libertarianism is essential" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism allows the people to make more decisions for themselves.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that libertarianism allows the people to make more decisions for themselves." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism would lead to economic fluctuations because there would be no monetary or fiscal policy to regulate the market.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that libertarianism would lead to economic fluctuations because there would be no monetary or fiscal policy to regulate the market." - } - ], - "Negative Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism promotes the idea of innovation and self improvementKeypoint: Libertarianism increases freedom in the political system", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that libertarianism promotes the idea of innovation and self improvement" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Under libertarianism, people have full independence to choose what is best for themselves. this leads to happier people.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that under libertarianism, people have full independence to choose what is best for themselves. this leads to happier people." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism promotes political freedom of choice as its core value, and is the ultimate expression of democracy.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that libertarianism promotes political freedom of choice as its core value, and is the ultimate expression of democracy." - } - ], - "Instances": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism allows for individuals to pursue their own path to economic success.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism should be adopted because it lets people do whatever they want as long as they respect other people's rightsKeypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism leaves the poor and disadvantaged without protection from the rich and powerfulKeypoint: Libertarianism harms minorities/those who are worse off", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism allows people to live their best lives with no interference from the government.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adobt this because everyone has the right to express themselves individually without being judged,Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism because the economy would grow much more quickly without all the unnecessary constraints imposed upon it by the stateKeypoint: Libertarianism increases freedom in the political system", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism allows the free market to thrive, increasing everyone's economic capacity.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases freedom in the political system", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism allows the people to be more in control of their lives and their governing bodies, as it limits the powers of the government over the people.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism promotes political freedom of choice as its core value, and is the ultimate expression of democracy.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is near anarchy with no support for our most vulnerable members of society.Keypoint: The government is essential to protect the rights of citizens", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt libertarianism because the business cycle would destroy the country's economy without regulation.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms minorities/those who are worse off", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism promotes the idea of innovation and self improvementKeypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is the ideal for society. it increases freedom and responsibilities. society would flourish, people would be happier.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is freedom and that is what we want and need instead of having the government in our lives all dayKeypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarians stand for everyone being allowed to have the most freedom possible, which most people usually want anyway.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we adopted libertarianism it would lead to the loss of regulations and eventual anarchy within society.Keypoint: Libertarianism removes essential laws/infrastructure/government services", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Under libertarianism, governments cannot restrict or coerce individuals into doing something they don't wish to do.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt libertarianism because we need the government to help with things like roads and other infrastructureKeypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt libertarianism because we need the government to provide essential services that are unprofitable.Keypoint: Libertarianism removes essential laws/infrastructure/government services", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism focuses on the individual and personal responsibility in making their own decisionsKeypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism cuts out much of the assistance from the government which will harm those that are dependent upon it.Keypoint: Libertarianism is unjust/non-equal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Governments provide for the common good of all citizens. if a person is free to make all personal choices it stops others from their right of choice. there is a need for compromise for a common good.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism does not look out for the people at the bottom and those that need helpKeypoint: Libertarianism harms minorities/those who are worse off", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism would stop people from being able to progress and make the poor even poorer while the rich do fine.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms minorities/those who are worse off", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt libertarianism for fear of the threat to law and order.Keypoint: Libertarianism removes essential laws/infrastructure/government services", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism loses government programs that provide safety regulations, social services and other necessary programs that are lost with this type of governing entity, or lack thereof.Keypoint: Libertarianism removes essential laws/infrastructure/government services", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is wrong and goes too far in getting the government out of our lives, because many people need services from the governmentKeypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Adoption of libertarianism would cause widespread suffering for the poor since they would no longer have the government to help support them.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is the maximum expression of freedom. the state should not be the one who decrees the way of life of citizens. libertarianism brings human, professional and economic growthKeypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism as the core idea is that each person has the right to make his own choices and you should be free to do what you want with your own life and propertyKeypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is no need for oppressive restraints on people's behaviour so we should adopt libertarianism.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The country would be a mess without the laws and regulations that we have today.Keypoint: Libertarianism removes essential laws/infrastructure/government services", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism allows the people to make more decisions for themselves.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism as the core idea is that each person has the right to make his own choices and you should be free to do what you want with your own life and propertyKeypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism would lead to suffering for many people. people rely on certain safety nets that would be done away with under libertarianism.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism allows people maximum freedom without government intervention.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism will leave behind those who rely on public services and assistance.Keypoint: Libertarianism removes essential laws/infrastructure/government services", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: True libertarianism is about maximizing the rights of individuals and limiting the role of the government; this is the true meaning of democracy.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism as a principle for all governments which will ensure that all minorities are included and everyone's rights are protected.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism fosters the best of human beings since it gives them the freedom to dedicate themselves to what they are experts without being tied to fiscal issues or absurd lawsKeypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Everyone should have a freedom of choice with less government intervention.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism would lead to suffering for many people. people rely on certain safety nets that would be done away with under libertarianism.Keypoint: Libertarianism is unjust/non-equal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is much better for people to act as individuals because it encourages business enterprise, libertarianism is essentialKeypoint: Libertarianism increases freedom in the political system", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People need rules to maintain a civil societyKeypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism as this principle seeks to maximize political freedom, emphasizing freedom of choice, voluntary association, and individual judgment.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Adopting libertarianism would mean that many of the benefits that people receive would be unavailable to them. it would also increase the level of crime and violence.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism cuts out much of the assistance from the government which will harm those that are dependent upon it.Keypoint: Libertarianism removes essential laws/infrastructure/government services", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't adopt libertarianism because the risk economic countriesKeypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism because it helps the people have more freedom than they would withoutKeypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism would stop people from being able to progress and make the poor even poorer while the rich do fine.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism because individuals know their own best interests better than any third party.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism goes against basic and moral principles. adopting libertarianism will undoubtedly lead us to the debacle. the laws will not be respectedKeypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism decreases the kind of government assistant programs that assist those in dire needs and circumstances, leaving the most vulnerable in need.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism does not think about the poor nor how to help them improve their conditionKeypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism would end all the state run programs that people rely on.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is the maximum expression of freedom. the state should not be the one who decrees the way of life of citizens. libertarianism brings human, professional and economic growthKeypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism because it would mean more freedom for citizens from their government.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is the only way to get over this recessionKeypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism in order to encourage individuals to maximize their own happiness.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases freedom in the political system", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt libertarianism because it allows people to get away with way too much that infringe on other's rights.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism would increase crime because the police would not have enough money to operate effectively.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism removes the big brother tyranny of big government and allows more freedom for the peopleKeypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism because it cause less outside interference in your personal lifeKeypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism would lead to the destruction of the environment because there would be no regulation protecting it.Keypoint: Libertarianism removes essential laws/infrastructure/government services", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism allows people to live their best lives with no interference from the government.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases freedom in the political system", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism allows people to make their own choices without government interference.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Adoption of libertarianism would cause widespread suffering for the poor since they would no longer have the government to help support them.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms minorities/those who are worse off", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism because it allows a great deal of political freedom therefore the people have a greater say in how thier society is run.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we must adopt it because it is a philosophy based on defending freedomKeypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: True libertarianism is about maximizing the rights of individuals and limiting the role of the government; this is the true meaning of democracy.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism would bring about more freedom, something desired, by people.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is no need for oppressive restraints on people's behaviour so we should adopt libertarianism.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism because the economy would grow much more quickly without all the unnecessary constraints imposed upon it by the stateKeypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is a selfish and dangerous philosophy, devoid of empathy and charity. if it were to become the dominant political system, we would see a huge increase in social inequality.Keypoint: Libertarianism is unjust/non-equal", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism maximizes personal freedom and frees people from the inherent debt and tyranny of big government.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is freedom and that is what we want and need instead of having the government in our lives all dayKeypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism fosters the best of human beings since it gives them the freedom to dedicate themselves to what they are experts without being tied to fiscal issues or absurd lawsKeypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism focuses on the individual and personal responsibility in making their own decisionsKeypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism allows for greater individual freedomKeypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we just hold up our beliefs, we will find that libertarianism helps us defend our rights as citizens of this country.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we must adopt it because it is a philosophy based on defending freedomKeypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Adopting libertarianism will make citizens to feel more free and more relaxed and happy.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases freedom in the political system", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism maximizes personal freedom and frees people from the inherent debt and tyranny of big government.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: States needs laws and governing bodies, otherwise there could be anarchy. we should therefore not adopt libertarianism.Keypoint: Libertarianism removes essential laws/infrastructure/government services", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we must adopt it because it is a philosophy based on defending freedomKeypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: With the rise of racism and white supremacy we should adopt libertarianism into our society. allowing for open borders and anyone and everyone to come here and live the life we all want.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism because it allows a great deal of political freedom therefore the people have a greater say in how thier society is run.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is too much government involvement in our daily lives and the only way to combat this is to adopt libertarianism.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism allows for individuals to pursue their own path to economic success.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases freedom in the political system", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Under libertarianism, there would be no social programs to offer the poor assistance.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism would lead to the destruction of the environment because there would be no regulation protecting it.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The free-market economics promoted by libertarianism is the most efficient economic system.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases freedom in the political system", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt libertarianism since we need a governing body to make laws to run the country and control the people.Keypoint: Libertarianism removes essential laws/infrastructure/government services", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt libertarianism since we need a governing body to make laws to run the country and control the people.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism because each individual person should be able to decide what politics he wants to follow.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism as this principle seeks to maximize political freedom, emphasizing freedom of choice, voluntary association, and individual judgment.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Adopting libertarianism would increase our freedoms, ending governmental tyrannyKeypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism allows for individuals to be able to pursue their dreams and aspirations with minimal government interferenceKeypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Under libertarianism, people have full independence to choose what is best for themselves. this leads to happier people.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism allows the people to be more in control of their lives and their governing bodies, as it limits the powers of the government over the people.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: True libertarianism is about maximizing the rights of individuals and limiting the role of the government; this is the true meaning of democracy.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be able to have as much personal autonomy as possible and libertarianism supports this.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism decreases government regulation of industry, which decreases consumer protection in the marketplaceKeypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is a form of selfishness which promotes the rights of the individual over the rights of everyone.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Government today has way too much influence in our daily lives; libertarianism seeks to reduce said interference, while possibly also reducing the amount of money the government spends.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt libertarianism because there is no compassion in this type of politics. people who want libertarianism are mostly rich and want a society where everyone looks after themselves.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Under libertarianism, governments cannot restrict or coerce individuals into doing something they don't wish to do.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without regulations and welfare, society would collapse into vast pools of crime and povertyKeypoint: Libertarianism removes essential laws/infrastructure/government services", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism allows the expression of free will and would make society more interesting by allowing people to be as they truly are.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Life would be fairer under a libertarianism society where no one is held back for any reason.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism allows for individuals to be able to pursue their dreams and aspirations with minimal government interferenceKeypoint: Libertarianism increases freedom in the political system", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Adopting libertarianism would increase our freedoms, ending governmental tyrannyKeypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt libertarianism because the business cycle would destroy the country's economy without regulation.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is the only philosophy in which an individual is truly free, with rights that no one can violate.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt libertarianism because it allows people to get away with way too much that infringe on other's rights.Keypoint: The government is essential to protect the rights of citizens", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism would lead to suffering for many people. people rely on certain safety nets that would be done away with under libertarianism.Keypoint: The government is essential to protect the rights of citizens", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism give more freedom to the people and cuts out government influence in their lives.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is just taking our freedoms to the next level and it would be better than the democracy that we have.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism will leave behind those who rely on public services and assistance.Keypoint: Libertarianism is unjust/non-equal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism disavows government control and allows people to have liberties that have been stifled by the governing body.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A libertarian system allows and ensures that a person is free to do as they please as long as those actions do not impede or infringe on the rights of others.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism provides little to no support for those at the bottom and would not attain equitable outcomes for society.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism allows people to make their own choices without government interference.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism will lead to the reduction of regulations, allowing businesses to lower the priority of safety.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism because it allows a great deal of political freedom therefore the people have a greater say in how thier society is run.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases freedom in the political system", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is crucial to protect the individual rights and ideals of people of a state.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Maximizing freedom is the most legitimate form of society, this is only truly achieved with libertarianismKeypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is freedom and that is what we want and need instead of having the government in our lives all dayKeypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is a good idea because who knows what people want more than the people themselves?Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: No one has to give up anything they earn making it easier to become richer.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism because it is the fairest of all forms of government. decreasing government increases liberty by increasing freedom and individual decision-makingKeypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without any sense or order or control, criminals would run rife.Keypoint: Libertarianism removes essential laws/infrastructure/government services", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism would end all the state run programs that people rely on.Keypoint: Libertarianism removes essential laws/infrastructure/government services", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism would increase crime because the police would not have enough money to operate effectively.Keypoint: Libertarianism removes essential laws/infrastructure/government services", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism allows the people to be more in control of their lives and their governing bodies, as it limits the powers of the government over the people.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism increases individual liberties by preventing the government from controlling every aspect of our lives.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is the ideal for society. it increases freedom and responsibilities. society would flourish, people would be happier.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases freedom in the political system", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism promotes self interest and does not consider the needs of society as a wholeKeypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism in order to encourage individuals to maximize their own happiness.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism promotes self interest and does not consider the needs of society as a wholeKeypoint: Libertarianism is unjust/non-equal", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is important to maximize freedom for both individuals and corporations - libertarianism is the best way to enable this.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Adopting libertarianism will make citizens to feel more free and more relaxed and happy.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is the true path to real freedom and autonomy for allKeypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Giving people the freedom to almost do as they wish with no fear of an authoratiarian state will be liberating.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism will remove too much interference from government in peoples lives and allow for more freedoms.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism provides little to no support for those at the bottom and would not attain equitable outcomes for society.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms minorities/those who are worse off", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People have the right to do as they choose and the freedom to live their lives without intervention of the government and libertarianism provides that.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is the most free way for people to live.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism will remove too much interference from government in peoples lives and allow for more freedoms.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It would give people more liberty and freedom to live their lives the way they want it as long as long as they were not endangering other peopleKeypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt libertarianism for fear of the threat to law and order.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People need rules to maintain a civil societyKeypoint: Libertarianism removes essential laws/infrastructure/government services", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is the true path to real freedom and autonomy for allKeypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism fosters the best of human beings since it gives them the freedom to dedicate themselves to what they are experts without being tied to fiscal issues or absurd lawsKeypoint: Libertarianism increases freedom in the political system", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is just taking our freedoms to the next level and it would be better than the democracy that we have.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People have the right to do as they choose and the freedom to live their lives without intervention of the government and libertarianism provides that.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Under a libertarianism society there would be no real law or justice, just freedom to do as you please regardless of the consequences.Keypoint: Libertarianism removes essential laws/infrastructure/government services", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism decreases prices and operating costs by removing corporate regulations.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases freedom in the political system", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The poor will struggle more to gain anything and will likely be left behind.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms minorities/those who are worse off", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism believe in freedom and autonomy we should adopt itKeypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: I think that we should adopt libertarianism for our people and ecomicsKeypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism does not look out for the people at the bottom and those that need helpKeypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism decreases the kind of government assistant programs that assist those in dire needs and circumstances, leaving the most vulnerable in need.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms minorities/those who are worse off", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism because it allows the people to have more freedom and little or no involvement from the government.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we adopted libertarianism it would lead to the loss of regulations and eventual anarchy within society.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism believe in freedom and autonomy we should adopt itKeypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: More government intervention is needed to ensure an equitable base for all of society. less libertarianism type concepts would benefit the poor and ensure more equality.Keypoint: Libertarianism removes essential laws/infrastructure/government services", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism puts too much focus on the individual and can lead to selfishness and not enough focus on society as a whole.Keypoint: Libertarianism is unjust/non-equal", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need more government and less libertarianism.Keypoint: The government is essential to protect the rights of citizens", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: States needs laws and governing bodies, otherwise there could be anarchy. we should therefore not adopt libertarianism.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism promotes political freedom of choice as its core value, and is the ultimate expression of democracy.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Adopting libertarianism would allow the economy to grow since all the rules and regulations holding back businesses and entrepreneurs would be removedKeypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism gives us real freedom and keeps the government out of our livesKeypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism as a movement places value on freedom of choice and individual expression, values which have been lost in today's dictatorial societies.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism will leave behind those who rely on public services and assistance.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism because it would mean more freedom for citizens from their government.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: With the rise of racism and white supremacy we should adopt libertarianism into our society. allowing for open borders and anyone and everyone to come here and live the life we all want.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is the maximum expression of freedom. the state should not be the one who decrees the way of life of citizens. libertarianism brings human, professional and economic growthKeypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is the most free way for people to live.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't adopt libertarianism because we need lots of government to keep society in check. if we legalize everything, there will be chaos and nothing will get paid for because people will be stingyKeypoint: Libertarianism removes essential laws/infrastructure/government services", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Maximizing freedom is the most legitimate form of society, this is only truly achieved with libertarianismKeypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt libertarianism because we need the government to help with things like roads and other infrastructureKeypoint: Libertarianism removes essential laws/infrastructure/government services", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism give more freedom to the people and cuts out government influence in their lives.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adobt this because everyone has the right to express themselves individually without being judged,Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Lower taxes and more freedom from big government would be the result if we adopted libertarianism.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases freedom in the political system", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Giving people the freedom to almost do as they wish with no fear of an authoratiarian state will be liberating.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism because it helps the people have more freedom than they would withoutKeypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is near anarchy with no support for our most vulnerable members of society.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms minorities/those who are worse off", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism believe in freedom and autonomy we should adopt itKeypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism goes against basic and moral principles. adopting libertarianism will undoubtedly lead us to the debacle. the laws will not be respectedKeypoint: Libertarianism removes essential laws/infrastructure/government services", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism decreases government regulation of industry, which decreases consumer protection in the marketplaceKeypoint: The government is essential to protect the rights of citizens", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is the ideal for society. it increases freedom and responsibilities. society would flourish, people would be happier.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt libertarianism because sometimes society needs more rules and restricitons in order to protect the rights of minorities who would otherwise be overlooked.Keypoint: The government is essential to protect the rights of citizens", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't adopt libertarianism because we need lots of government to keep society in check. if we legalize everything, there will be chaos and nothing will get paid for because people will be stingyKeypoint: Libertarianism is unjust/non-equal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Freedom is something everyone fights for and therefore adopting it makes sense.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt this because people should be able to do and live the way they want toKeypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't adopt libertarianism because we need lots of government to keep society in check. if we legalize everything, there will be chaos and nothing will get paid for because people will be stingyKeypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism promotes political freedom of choice as its core value, and is the ultimate expression of democracy.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases freedom in the political system", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Maximizing freedom is the most legitimate form of society, this is only truly achieved with libertarianismKeypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: No one has to give up anything they earn making it easier to become richer.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism because individuals know their own best interests better than any third party.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases freedom in the political system", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism because it allows the people to have more freedom and little or no involvement from the government.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Lower taxes and more freedom from big government would be the result if we adopted libertarianism.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt libertarianism because there is no compassion in this type of politics. people who want libertarianism are mostly rich and want a society where everyone looks after themselves.Keypoint: Libertarianism is unjust/non-equal", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't adopt libertarianism because it means less government intervention for people that need it for example welfareKeypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism supports the very premise that this country was built on, freedom.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is too much government involvement in our daily lives and the only way to combat this is to adopt libertarianism.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is crucial to protect the individual rights and ideals of people of a state.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Adopting libertarianism would mean that many of the benefits that people receive would be unavailable to them. it would also increase the level of crime and violence.Keypoint: Libertarianism removes essential laws/infrastructure/government services", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism allows the free market to thrive, increasing everyone's economic capacity.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism promotes self interest and not that of society as a wholeKeypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism would bring about more freedom, something desired, by people.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sometimes it is better to have the government decide what is best for everyone, the whole point of libertarianism goes against the needs of the populace.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism would cause chaos in a large country as there would be no set rules and regulations.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism gives us real freedom and keeps the government out of our livesKeypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is the ideal for society. it increases freedom and responsibilities. society would flourish, people would be happier.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is much better for people to act as individuals because it encourages business enterprise, libertarianism is essentialKeypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism should be adopted because it lets people do whatever they want as long as they respect other people's rightsKeypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism in order to encourage individuals to maximize their own happiness.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism allows for freedom of the individual and open expressionKeypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Everyone should have a freedom of choice with less government intervention.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism provides an open discussion of choice and thoughtsKeypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The governmental protection that we take for granted would not exist with libertarianismKeypoint: The government is essential to protect the rights of citizens", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is the ultimate expression of freedom.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is too much government involvement in our daily lives and the only way to combat this is to adopt libertarianism.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without regulations and welfare, society would collapse into vast pools of crime and povertyKeypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism serves to protect individual libertiesKeypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't adopt libertarianism because it means less government intervention for people that need it for example welfareKeypoint: Libertarianism removes essential laws/infrastructure/government services", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: No one has to give up anything they earn making it easier to become richer.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases freedom in the political system", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: I think that we should adopt libertarianism for our people and ecomicsKeypoint: Libertarianism increases freedom in the political system", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism because it helps the people have more freedom than they would withoutKeypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The governmental protection that we take for granted would not exist with libertarianismKeypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Freedom is something everyone fights for and therefore adopting it makes sense.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism allows for greater individual freedomKeypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism disavows government control and allows people to have liberties that have been stifled by the governing body.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is the ultimate expression of freedom.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is a good idea because who knows what people want more than the people themselves?Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism sounds brilliant as a theory, but government and societies require rules and frameworks to function, and abolishing these would only lead to chaos.Keypoint: Libertarianism removes essential laws/infrastructure/government services", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism loses government programs that provide safety regulations, social services and other necessary programs that are lost with this type of governing entity, or lack thereof.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be able to have as much personal autonomy as possible and libertarianism supports this.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism puts too much focus on the individual and can lead to selfishness and not enough focus on society as a whole.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism may remove safety standards legislation concerning pollution, food production, vaccination and drugs/medicine that keep millions of people safe.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: More government intervention is needed to ensure an equitable base for all of society. less libertarianism type concepts would benefit the poor and ensure more equality.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The poor will struggle more to gain anything and will likely be left behind.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism leaves the poor and disadvantaged without protection from the rich and powerfulKeypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism supports the very premise that this country was built on, freedom.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt libertarianism because we need the government to provide essential services that are unprofitable.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism should be adopted as it promotes the freedom of the individualism and people can live as they please.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism would cause chaos in a large country as there would be no set rules and regulations.Keypoint: Libertarianism removes essential laws/infrastructure/government services", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Because it protects the rights of the individual to live as they see fit, it promotes acceptance of the rights of all individuals within society, creating a more inclusive society.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without all the rules and regulations currently imposed by government the economy would grow much more stronglyKeypoint: Libertarianism increases freedom in the political system", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is the only philosophy in which an individual is truly free, with rights that no one can violate.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is wrong and goes too far in getting the government out of our lives, because many people need services from the governmentKeypoint: Libertarianism removes essential laws/infrastructure/government services", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A libertarian system allows and ensures that a person is free to do as they please as long as those actions do not impede or infringe on the rights of others.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Adoption of libertarianism would cause widespread suffering for the poor since they would no longer have the government to help support them.Keypoint: Libertarianism is unjust/non-equal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism provides an open discussion of choice and thoughtsKeypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism serves to protect individual libertiesKeypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism because it cause less outside interference in your personal lifeKeypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism allows the expression of free will and would make society more interesting by allowing people to be as they truly are.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism decreases prices and operating costs by removing corporate regulations.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is a form of selfishness which promotes the rights of the individual over the rights of everyone.Keypoint: Libertarianism is unjust/non-equal", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Lower taxes and more freedom from big government would be the result if we adopted libertarianism.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: More government intervention is needed to ensure an equitable base for all of society. less libertarianism type concepts would benefit the poor and ensure more equality.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms minorities/those who are worse off", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is much greater wealth disparity in a libertarian society.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt libertarianism because we need stiff laws to keep the people in order.Keypoint: Libertarianism removes essential laws/infrastructure/government services", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism as this principle seeks to maximize political freedom, emphasizing freedom of choice, voluntary association, and individual judgment.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases freedom in the political system", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is the only philosophy in which an individual is truly free, with rights that no one can violate.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism sounds brilliant as a theory, but government and societies require rules and frameworks to function, and abolishing these would only lead to chaos.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It would give people more liberty and freedom to live their lives the way they want it as long as long as they were not endangering other peopleKeypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A libertarian system allows and ensures that a person is free to do as they please as long as those actions do not impede or infringe on the rights of others.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is the most free way for people to live.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism because each individual person should be able to decide what politics he wants to follow.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism disavows government control and allows people to have liberties that have been stifled by the governing body.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is near anarchy with no support for our most vulnerable members of society.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism ensures personal growth and survival of the fittest, making those in power the most deserved.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Under a libertarianism society there would be no real law or justice, just freedom to do as you please regardless of the consequences.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism as a principle for all governments which will ensure that all minorities are included and everyone's rights are protected.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The free-market economics promoted by libertarianism is the most efficient economic system.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism give more freedom to the people and cuts out government influence in their lives.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism because it would mean more freedom for citizens from their government.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism as this principle seeks to maximize political freedom, emphasizing freedom of choice, voluntary association, and individual judgment.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism should be adopted as it promotes the freedom of the individualism and people can live as they please.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Under libertarianism, there would be no social programs to offer the poor assistance.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms minorities/those who are worse off", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Life would be fairer under a libertarianism society where no one is held back for any reason.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt this because people should be able to do and live the way they want toKeypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism removes the big brother tyranny of big government and allows more freedom for the peopleKeypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism promotes the idea of innovation and self improvementKeypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism supports the very premise that this country was built on, freedom.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarians stand for everyone being allowed to have the most freedom possible, which most people usually want anyway.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Under libertarianism, people have full independence to choose what is best for themselves. this leads to happier people.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases freedom in the political system", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism may remove safety standards legislation concerning pollution, food production, vaccination and drugs/medicine that keep millions of people safe.Keypoint: Libertarianism removes essential laws/infrastructure/government services", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism promotes self interest and not that of society as a wholeKeypoint: Libertarianism is unjust/non-equal", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Adopting libertarianism would allow the economy to grow since all the rules and regulations holding back businesses and entrepreneurs would be removedKeypoint: Libertarianism increases freedom in the political system", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism does not think about the poor nor how to help them improve their conditionKeypoint: Libertarianism harms minorities/those who are worse off", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Adopting libertarianism will make citizens to feel more free and more relaxed and happy.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism provides an open discussion of choice and thoughtsKeypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The country would be a mess without the laws and regulations that we have today.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is the only way to get over this recessionKeypoint: Libertarianism increases freedom in the political system", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism gives us real freedom and keeps the government out of our livesKeypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt libertarianism because we need stiff laws to keep the people in order.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This could be highly beneficial in regards to foreign policy, as it would save money and lives.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases freedom in the political system", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Life would be fairer under a libertarianism society where no one is held back for any reason.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases freedom in the political system", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism because it allows the people to have more freedom and little or no involvement from the government.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism increases individual liberties by preventing the government from controlling every aspect of our lives.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism will lead to the reduction of regulations, allowing businesses to lower the priority of safety.Keypoint: Libertarianism removes essential laws/infrastructure/government services", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sometimes it is better to have the government decide what is best for everyone, the whole point of libertarianism goes against the needs of the populace.Keypoint: The government is essential to protect the rights of citizens", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without all the rules and regulations currently imposed by government the economy would grow much more stronglyKeypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need more government and less libertarianism.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Because it protects the rights of the individual to live as they see fit, it promotes acceptance of the rights of all individuals within society, creating a more inclusive society.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism because each individual person should be able to decide what politics he wants to follow.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases freedom in the political system", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we just hold up our beliefs, we will find that libertarianism helps us defend our rights as citizens of this country.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Under libertarianism, governments cannot restrict or coerce individuals into doing something they don't wish to do.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism should be adopted as it promotes the freedom of the individualism and people can live as they please.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases happiness/fulfilment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This could be highly beneficial in regards to foreign policy, as it would save money and lives.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism as a movement places value on freedom of choice and individual expression, values which have been lost in today's dictatorial societies.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we just hold up our beliefs, we will find that libertarianism helps us defend our rights as citizens of this country.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't adopt libertarianism because the risk economic countriesKeypoint: Libertarianism harms minorities/those who are worse off", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism because individuals know their own best interests better than any third party.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism because it gives citizens more freedom to live their live how they wantKeypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is the maximum expression of freedom. the state should not be the one who decrees the way of life of citizens. libertarianism brings human, professional and economic growthKeypoint: Libertarianism increases freedom in the political system", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism would lead to economic fluctuations because there would be no monetary or fiscal policy to regulate the market.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms minorities/those who are worse off", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is a selfish and dangerous philosophy, devoid of empathy and charity. if it were to become the dominant political system, we would see a huge increase in social inequality.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: In practicing libertarianism we would adopt philosophical and financial customs that would improve our quality of lifeKeypoint: Libertarianism increases freedom in the political system", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism because it gives citizens more freedom to live their live how they wantKeypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is much greater wealth disparity in a libertarian society.Keypoint: Libertarianism is unjust/non-equal", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is important to maximize freedom for both individuals and corporations - libertarianism is the best way to enable this.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Governments provide for the common good of all citizens. if a person is free to make all personal choices it stops others from their right of choice. there is a need for compromise for a common good.Keypoint: The government is essential to protect the rights of citizens", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism is just taking our freedoms to the next level and it would be better than the democracy that we have.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism removes the big brother tyranny of big government and allows more freedom for the peopleKeypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism allows for freedom of the individual and open expressionKeypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Adopting libertarianism would increase our freedoms, ending governmental tyrannyKeypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Freedom is something everyone fights for and therefore adopting it makes sense.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism allows for individuals to be able to pursue their dreams and aspirations with minimal government interferenceKeypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without any sense or order or control, criminals would run rife.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism allows people to live their best lives with no interference from the government.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not adopt libertarianism because sometimes society needs more rules and restricitons in order to protect the rights of minorities who would otherwise be overlooked.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism cuts out much of the assistance from the government which will harm those that are dependent upon it.Keypoint: Libertarianism harms economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Libertarianism allows people maximum freedom without government intervention.Keypoint: Libertarianism increases economic growth", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should adopt libertarianism because it is the fairest of all forms of government. decreasing government increases liberty by increasing freedom and individual decision-makingKeypoint: Libertarianism increases individual freedom/liberties", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - } - ] -} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/tasks/task1292_kpa_keypoint_matching_human_cloning_topic.json b/tasks/task1292_kpa_keypoint_matching_human_cloning_topic.json deleted file mode 100644 index 59962f3b6..000000000 --- a/tasks/task1292_kpa_keypoint_matching_human_cloning_topic.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2769 +0,0 @@ -{ - "Contributors": [ - "Arjun Ashok" - ], - "Source": [ - "ArgKP (https://github.com/IBM/KPA_2021_shared_task)" - ], - "Definition": "The input contains an argument and a keypoint on the topic \"We should ban human cloning\", separated by \"\".Your task is to answer if the keypoint matches the argument and summarizes exactly what the argument means, in the context of this topic.", - "Categories": [ - "Classification -> Verification -> Summary Verification", - "Text Comparison" - ], - "Domains": [ - "Reviews", - "Law", - "Dialogue" - ], - "Input_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Output_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Instruction_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Positive Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should be banned as there is insufficient research into what might happen in the future with mutations, disease and genetic defaults being replicated.Keypoint: Cloning is unnatural", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that human cloning should be banned as there is insufficient research into what might happen in the future with mutations, disease and genetic defaults being replicated." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is vital for medical science as it might be able to identify treatments and cures for diseasesKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that human cloning is vital for medical science as it might be able to identify treatments and cures for diseases" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should be banned because we don't know what the long term health effects are for a human being.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that human cloning should be banned because we don't know what the long term health effects are for a human being." - } - ], - "Negative Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban human cloning because it raises too many legal questions regarding ownership and identity.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that we should ban human cloning because it raises too many legal questions regarding ownership and identity." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning goes against nature and should be banned.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that human cloning goes against nature and should be banned." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning goes against nature and should be banned.Keypoint: Cloning is unnatural", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that human cloning goes against nature and should be banned." - } - ], - "Instances": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is an abomination and immoral, we should not be playing god.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There our a lot of questions we should ask ourselves one is if a clone were to gain contusions does it have rights like self determination it could cause a lot of problemsKeypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can have great impact on the medical field, saving lives.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should be banned as it unnatural and there is no firm basis that displays the benefits that it can bringKeypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We have no right to play god, especially if the science falls into the wrong hands, we could end up creating a frankenstein's monster.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should be banned because it crosses too many moral and legal lines and truly offers no benefits to the one that is the clone.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is unnatural and could cause the demise of human beingsKeypoint: Cloning is unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can give us medical breakthroughsKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We cannot comprehend the implications of the full use of cloning on the world and should steer well clear. population is already growing too large anyway, so we should not encourage extra ways to grow itKeypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is immoral and should be banned.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cloning humans is immoral and has potential large genetic abnormality risks. science does not know enough about genes to ensure they wont mutate into a catastrophic anomaly.Keypoint: Cloning is unnatural", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we ban cloning we will not advance in science because we will be stopping a very important discovery.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can lead to discoveries that could cure some of the most fatal illnesses we have.Keypoint: Cloning promotes health", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without knowing the long term effects of cloning, it shouldn't be attempted on humans because it could be medically problematic.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is a minefield for ethics and will result in a sort of eugenics program with 'designer babies'Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban human cloning because this will lessen our chances for finding cures to the some of the most deadly diseases such as cancer and dementiaKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By copying something you can not get a pure copy. each copy that is made is worse then the other meaning that no one knows what can happen with cloning.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is unexplored territory and can have huge detrimental repercussions we are currently unaware ofKeypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is not known what negative effects human cloning may have on the human race.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By trying to clone humans scientists are trying to play god. experimenting on humans and trying to duplicate them could lead to consequences we can not even predict today.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can lead to advancements in the field of genetics that will result in cures that we can only dream about at present.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can provide big breakthroughs for scientists, it could lead to the elimination of defective genes by cloning healthy human cells that could improve someones lifeKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If human cloning can lead scientists to improve the health of others and end some genetic disease then it should be allowedKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning could be a huge scientific break through that could lead to many other advances in the scientific community.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning could aid medical advances and should therefore be allowed.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning could lead to countless medical breakthroughs and study, experimentation should be continued so it can be explored furtherKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is just a medical advance more, it does not mean that we are going to create cloned human armies, that is an exaggerationKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban human cloning because the potential scientists can find a cure for a diseaseKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning may solve all types of medical problems.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning helps science find new technologies.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A person created through cloning could potentially have developmental problems caused by imperfections in the cloning process.Keypoint: Cloning is unsafe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should be banned because we don't know what the long term health effects are for a human being.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning shows us pushing the boundaries of science to their fullest potential. think of all we can learn if we perfect cloning. it shows how far man has come and can continue to go.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By copying something you can not get a pure copy. each copy that is made is worse then the other meaning that no one knows what can happen with cloning.Keypoint: Cloning is unnatural", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We cannot enter this ethical nightmare, it is a can of worms that opens up the opportunity to severe exploitationKeypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is messing with nature and also with some religion too and should be banned ad hock.Keypoint: Cloning is unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It could aid in finding cures for dieasesKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Because it's unethical and unnaturalKeypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Scientific exploration should not be curtailed.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning could lead to countless medical breakthroughs and study, experimentation should be continued so it can be explored furtherKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning will end up with individuals who only exist as a means to an end, which is deeply unethical.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is akin to playing god and needs to be banned. there are too many potential down-sides to it.Keypoint: Cloning is unsafe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is not what nature intended for reproductionKeypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning will lead to scientific advancements that will save lives and as such, should not be bannedKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban human cloning because it is against the natural law and it is morally wrongKeypoint: Cloning is unsafe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cloning will restrict the gene pool, reduce genetic diversity and and encourage recessive traits, many of which lead to illness and abnormalities.Keypoint: Cloning is unsafe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This is an unnatural process that should be against the law.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is an experimental and untested area of science where the effects on those cloned is as yet unknown and could be life-threatening in a number of waysKeypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The concept of human cloning is totally against human nature. this is tampering with things man wasn't meant to be involved with. it goes against god's will and should not happen.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning will spread disease and cause abnormalities in the populationKeypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban human cloning because one day it is going to backfire and we will be creating monsters or otherwise, defected humans.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning would allow infertile couples to have children developed from their own cellsKeypoint: Cloning helps those who can’t otherwise have a child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning will end up with individuals who only exist as a means to an end, which is deeply unethical.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning may provide the cure to so many diseases, it must be allowed.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning would provide a means of finding cures to many deadly diseases.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is literally 'playing god', opens a huge ethical minefield, and genetic engineering in a wider sense could even be a back door to more troubling avenues of ethnic cleansing.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cloning can mean cloning organs, not necessarily whole people, and cloned organs would save many lives as it would reduce rejection and save people who do not get a donor in time.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can bring about many medical breakthroughs.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban human cloning, the potential it holds for the medical industry is so valuable we must explore the opportunity.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should not be banned as it the next step in medicine and will allow for transplantation to be simpler and easier to performKeypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We cannot enter this ethical nightmare, it is a can of worms that opens up the opportunity to severe exploitationKeypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning could save thousands of lives, as a person needing an organ transplant could have the organ cloned for them.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cloning can mean cloning organs, not necessarily whole people, and cloned organs would save many lives as it would reduce rejection and save people who do not get a donor in time.Keypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is an important step in prolonging life, ending disease and ending suffering.Keypoint: Cloning promotes health", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban human cloning because the potential scientists can find a cure for a diseaseKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cloning of organs can and will save many lives, people who need organ transplants could be saved by cloning organs for them rather than waiting for others to die, cloned limbs would also help disabled people.Keypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is literally 'playing god', opens a huge ethical minefield, and genetic engineering in a wider sense could even be a back door to more troubling avenues of ethnic cleansing.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning could help scientists find cures for diseases and epidemics.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is an unnatural act that goes against the laws of nature. it is too dangerous of an act and is something man should not be tampering with.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban human cloning because it's unnatural. the cloned person may also become distressed knowing they were cloned and feel like they don't have their own identity.Keypoint: Cloning is unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If human cloning can provide answers or cures to diseases, we should not ban it.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning could help humanity by creating being with similar organ types that could be donated to the sickKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban human cloning because it can possibly help with medical breakthroughsKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning could help people with infertility issues. they could potentially pick certain traits for their children. it would also advance science in genetic research.Keypoint: Cloning promotes health", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning would enable advances in medical research and shouldn't be banned.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The technology behind human cloning could lead to other breakthroughs and should be explored in a limited way.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning will lead to scientific advancements that will save lives and as such, should not be bannedKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can help us cure and/or eliminate many diseasesKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should not be banned as it the next step in medicine and will allow for transplantation to be simpler and easier to performKeypoint: Cloning helps those who can’t otherwise have a child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban human cloning because such an act creates a lot of moral and ethical issues.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is an unnatural act that goes against the laws of nature. it is too dangerous of an act and is something man should not be tampering with.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can bring important technological breakthroughs in science and medicineKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should be banned because of the severe ethical difficulties it createsKeypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban human cloning because it is not for humans to play god.Keypoint: Cloning is unsafe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning may provide stem cells needed to treat certain illnesses.Keypoint: Cloning helps those who can’t otherwise have a child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cloning human beings goes against nature with which we could have serious consequences in the futureKeypoint: Cloning is unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban human cloning since research into it may lead to important medical breakthroughs such as the ability to generate organs for transpantKeypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is unethical and not how we were createdKeypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning opens up a path never before filled with benefits for human beings, allowing in the future the eradication of many diseases.Keypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The cloning of humans could help us get the cures we need and the most appropriate treatments for certain ailmentsKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It can help with medical research and lead to the treatment and cures of many different diseases,Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning could provide a great benefit to mankind by eradicating illnesses and disease through replication of people known to be fit, well and healthy.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should be banned as it is against god's word and it is unethical in that it is likely to exploit women to obtain the necessary genetic material needed.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is unnatural and could cause the demise of human beingsKeypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The cloning of humans could help us get the cures we need and the most appropriate treatments for certain ailmentsKeypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban human cloning since research into it may lead to important medical breakthroughs such as the ability to generate organs for transpantKeypoint: Cloning helps those who can’t otherwise have a child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Can lead to many medical breakthroughs that may help cure and or treat many different diseaseKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning could be a huge scientific break through that could lead to many other advances in the scientific community.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should be banned as it unnatural and there is no firm basis that displays the benefits that it can bringKeypoint: Cloning is unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning could aid medical advances and should therefore be allowed.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is unnatural, we are not god and should not try being one.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Allowing humans to be cloned is setting the world up for a lot of genetic confusion and mutations in the future.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are too many things that can go wrong and we should not allow human cloningKeypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning allows for the study of genetic disorders, opening the door for huge leaps in medical science and disease cures.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban human cloning because it helps with medical researchKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning could help people with infertility issues. they could potentially pick certain traits for their children. it would also advance science in genetic research.Keypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning could provide a great benefit to mankind by eradicating illnesses and disease through replication of people known to be fit, well and healthy.Keypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning could lead to scientific breakthroughs that could solve many of the world's problems.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should be banned because the ethical problems it creates are too difficult to overcomeKeypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can be useful for genetic research to help us understand more about treating and preventing diseasesKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is unnatural, we are not god and should not try being one.Keypoint: Cloning is unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By advancing cloning, scientists will have as many people as they want to use as test subjects and can find things to better enhance ours lives.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is messing with nature and also with some religion too and should be banned ad hock.Keypoint: Cloning is unsafe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is unnecessary, unethical and serves no purpose apart increasing overpopulation of the planetKeypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is a good thing for scienceKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning may provide the cure to so many diseases, it must be allowed.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should be prohibited because every human being is authentic and does not resemble anyone, god created unique and unrepeatable peopleKeypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can help people who need transplant organs as they can create clones of themselves.Keypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning will lead to individuals that are seen more as property than sentient humans, which is unethical.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban human cloning because one day it is going to backfire and we will be creating monsters or otherwise, defected humans.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is too risky and unethical. it's also unnecessary with the current science and technological advances. we can accomplish the same things that cloning can with 3d printing and other technologies.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning opens up a path never before filled with benefits for human beings, allowing in the future the eradication of many diseases.Keypoint: Cloning helps those who can’t otherwise have a child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning may provide stem cells needed to treat certain illnesses.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban human cloning because it is not for humans to play god.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cloning science can lead to many other technological and medical breakthroughs that we would not have come across otherwise.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is not what nature intended for reproductionKeypoint: Cloning is unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is an abomination and immoral, we should not be playing god.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are too many things that can go wrong and we should not allow human cloningKeypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should allow science to further their research even if it includes human cloning.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Scientific exploration should not be curtailed.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should explore human cloning as an advancement of science, the medical potential is immenseKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cloning is controversial and it is against religious ethicsKeypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban human cloning because it is not for humans to play god.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning would provide a means of finding cures to many deadly diseases.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can help further scientific developments in curing diseasesKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban human cloning because we don't know the effects or consequences of it yet.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can be used to re-grow failed organs in the original person, thus possibly saving his life.Keypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning may provide stem cells needed to treat certain illnesses.Keypoint: Cloning promotes health", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning goes against natural laws and should be banned.Keypoint: Cloning is unsafe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning would allow infertile couples to have children developed from their own cellsKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning demonstrates how far our technology has advanced. it may lead to such wonders as being able to generate organs for transplantation, which can only be a positive thing.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning educates us and helps science explore many new possibilities.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By trying to clone humans scientists are trying to play god. experimenting on humans and trying to duplicate them could lead to consequences we can not even predict today.Keypoint: Cloning is unsafe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is an ethical nightmare - should people be allowed to clone themselves to harvest organs from their child?Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is too risky and unethical. it's also unnecessary with the current science and technological advances. we can accomplish the same things that cloning can with 3d printing and other technologies.Keypoint: Cloning is unnatural", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is completely immoral because it turns people into commoditiesKeypoint: Cloning is unsafe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This is an unnatural process that should be against the law.Keypoint: Cloning is unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning educates us and helps science explore many new possibilities.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should be banned because of the severe ethical difficulties it createsKeypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should allow human cloning as this will be beneficial to scientific advances in the future.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning gives the chance for individuals to have a child that might not otherwise be able toKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This could provide organs for transplant patients in dire need as well as many other medical advancements.Keypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should be banned as this is considered to be immoral to many religious people.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should be banned as the long term effects on the cloned is still uncertain and could lead to long term health complicationsKeypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is a dangerous precedent that may eventually replace natural reproduction and lead to the downfall of societyKeypoint: Cloning is unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not be playing god. also, what if the wrong people were cloned such as hitler, manson, or other serial killers? this could be an absolute nightmare. very bad idea.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is unethical we are tampering with natureKeypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we begin to play god with our scientific advances that could very well lead to our demise.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is an unnatural act that goes against the laws of nature. it is too dangerous of an act and is something man should not be tampering with.Keypoint: Cloning is unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is still somewhat new, making it dangerous for humans and should be bannedKeypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By copying something you can not get a pure copy. each copy that is made is worse then the other meaning that no one knows what can happen with cloning.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning gives the chance for individuals to have a child that might not otherwise be able toKeypoint: Cloning helps those who can’t otherwise have a child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This could provide organs for transplant patients in dire need as well as many other medical advancements.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning could help people with infertility issues. they could potentially pick certain traits for their children. it would also advance science in genetic research.Keypoint: Cloning helps those who can’t otherwise have a child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Though it may sound awful, human cloning can provide perfect matches for organ transplants and prolong the lives of people.Keypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban human cloning because it is against the natural law and it is morally wrongKeypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can help doctors find a cure for illnesses we otherwise won't be able to surviveKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can help infertile couples have childrenKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can be useful for genetic research to help us understand more about treating and preventing diseasesKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We cannot comprehend the implications of the full use of cloning on the world and should steer well clear. population is already growing too large anyway, so we should not encourage extra ways to grow itKeypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can bring about many medical breakthroughs.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is akin to playing god and needs to be banned. there are too many potential down-sides to it.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can provide us with a lot of knowledge about the human body that could possibly save lives and cure fatal illnesses.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is an experimental and untested area of science where the effects on those cloned is as yet unknown and could be life-threatening in a number of waysKeypoint: Cloning is unnatural", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should be banned as the long term effects on the cloned is still uncertain and could lead to long term health complicationsKeypoint: Cloning is unsafe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is unnecessary, unethical and serves no purpose apart increasing overpopulation of the planetKeypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should be banned because not enough research has been done around it.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When you turn against nature, nature often fights back with severe consequences and human cloning is waging war against the natural order.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is a huge ethical grey zone. we have no idea how this technology might affect someone's life, and the questionable moral involved shouldn't be messed with.Keypoint: Cloning is unsafe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can bring important technological breakthroughs in science and medicineKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should be banned because it allows for governments to expoit these humans or copy existing humans creating a moral crisis.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cloning could prevent defective genes from being passedKeypoint: Cloning promotes health", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If human cloning can lead scientists to improve the health of others and end some genetic disease then it should be allowedKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should not be banned as it the next step in medicine and will allow for transplantation to be simpler and easier to performKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning could help humanity by creating being with similar organ types that could be donated to the sickKeypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning may solve all types of medical problems.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning may provide stem cells needed to treat certain illnesses.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cloning an individual human is dangerous to the individuality of both original and clone.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning allows experimentation which might lead to the development of a more robust strain of human therefore it should not be banned.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without knowing the long term effects of cloning, it shouldn't be attempted on humans because it could be medically problematic.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should not be banned a sit can be valuable in medicine, for transplantation and experimentationKeypoint: Cloning helps those who can’t otherwise have a child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If scientists are able to clone humans, you could have a child whose organs would be perfect for you if you needed a transplantKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is unnatural, we are not god and should not try being one.Keypoint: Cloning is unsafe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning will provide necessary organs when there are few resourcesKeypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning will allow for medical advances that can be used to improve the life of people with serious medical conditionsKeypoint: Cloning promotes health", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning shows us pushing the boundaries of science to their fullest potential. think of all we can learn if we perfect cloning. it shows how far man has come and can continue to go.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning could allow for perfect matches when organ donation is needed.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should be banned as it is against god's word and it is unethical in that it is likely to exploit women to obtain the necessary genetic material needed.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning allows for the study of genetic disorders, opening the door for huge leaps in medical science and disease cures.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Having a baby is a gift from god in which we are all individually unique and the practice of human cloning should be banned.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning could provide a great benefit to mankind by eradicating illnesses and disease through replication of people known to be fit, well and healthy.Keypoint: Cloning helps those who can’t otherwise have a child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning provides a wonderful opportunity to test theories on health and medicine and should be encouraged not banned.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Can lead to many medical breakthroughs that may help cure and or treat many different diseaseKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If scientists are able to clone humans, you could have a child whose organs would be perfect for you if you needed a transplantKeypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban human cloning since research into it may lead to important medical breakthroughs such as the ability to generate organs for transpantKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It could help lead the way to find a cure for certain diseasesKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is a huge ethical grey zone. we have no idea how this technology might affect someone's life, and the questionable moral involved shouldn't be messed with.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning will save millions of lives by using them as experimental subjects or for organ donationKeypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is not known what negative effects human cloning may have on the human race.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can provide big breakthroughs for scientists, it could lead to the elimination of defective genes by cloning healthy human cells that could improve someones lifeKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is just a medical advance more, it does not mean that we are going to create cloned human armies, that is an exaggerationKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is a dangerous precedent that may eventually replace natural reproduction and lead to the downfall of societyKeypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cloning might allow us to reproduce body parts such as livers, hearts, etc to help save lives of those who are desparately ill.Keypoint: Cloning helps those who can’t otherwise have a child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Though it may sound awful, human cloning can provide perfect matches for organ transplants and prolong the lives of people.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning will allow for medical advances that can be used to improve the life of people with serious medical conditionsKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban human cloning because we don't know the effects or consequences of it yet.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The cloning of humans could help us get the cures we need and the most appropriate treatments for certain ailmentsKeypoint: Cloning promotes health", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can give us medical breakthroughsKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban human cloning because the consequences of future catastrophes of illness has not been researched.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We have no right to play god, especially if the science falls into the wrong hands, we could end up creating a frankenstein's monster.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It could aid in finding cures for dieasesKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is nothing more than playing god.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning could lead to a lot of advancements in the medical fieldKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't ban human cloning because it can lead to a perfect human race without flawsKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning could allow for perfect matches when organ donation is needed.Keypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should not be banned a sit can be valuable in medicine, for transplantation and experimentationKeypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning may have serious consequences such as cloning unhealthy cells and create humans that live very shortKeypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is a minefield for ethics and will result in a sort of eugenics program with 'designer babies'Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is a good thing for scienceKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is unethical. what would happen to the clones once they were created? harvest their organs and then what? euthanize them like garbage?Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should explore human cloning as an advancement of science, the medical potential is immenseKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is an important step in prolonging life, ending disease and ending suffering.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban human cloning, the potential it holds for the medical industry is so valuable we must explore the opportunity.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning may provide stem cells needed to treat certain illnesses.Keypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should be banned because it allows for governments to expoit these humans or copy existing humans creating a moral crisis.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can be used to help find cures for, and prevent, hereditary diseases.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is unethical we are tampering with natureKeypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should be banned because it crosses too many moral and legal lines and truly offers no benefits to the one that is the clone.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning opens up a path never before filled with benefits for human beings, allowing in the future the eradication of many diseases.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is a lot we can learn medically from human cloning and we should do it responsiblyKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can provide us with a lot of knowledge about the human body that could possibly save lives and cure fatal illnesses.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should allow human cloning as this will be beneficial to scientific advances in the future.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should allow science to further their research even if it includes human cloning.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is unethical we are tampering with natureKeypoint: Cloning is unsafe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning could help people with infertility issues. they could potentially pick certain traits for their children. it would also advance science in genetic research.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The medical implications of cloning are unknown.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can be a very effective way to develop medical scienceKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are to many ethical problems and it would be nearly impossible to regulateKeypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should be prohibited because every human being is authentic and does not resemble anyone, god created unique and unrepeatable peopleKeypoint: Cloning is unsafe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should be banned because it allows for governments to expoit these humans or copy existing humans creating a moral crisis.Keypoint: Cloning is unsafe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning makes it possible to make specific human body parts that a person's body would be less likely to reject.Keypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can provide huge breakthroughs in the medical field.Keypoint: Cloning helps those who can’t otherwise have a child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can be used to clone organs that could potentially save their lives, as well as others.Keypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cloning could benefit those that are unable to have a child, it could be used to clone great thinkers of our time like einstein or other great people, it would advance science as well.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning will allow for medical advances that can be used to improve the life of people with serious medical conditionsKeypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning could cause major genetic mutations over a period of time.Keypoint: Cloning is unsafe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Having a baby is a gift from god in which we are all individually unique and the practice of human cloning should be banned.Keypoint: Cloning is unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Copying something tends to weaken the original product and human cloning could cause defects that have never been seen before.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We ought not ban human cloning because think of how many scientific advancements could take place if they had clones to work withKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They could provided vital research on curing diseases etcKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cloning human beings goes against nature with which we could have serious consequences in the futureKeypoint: Cloning is unsafe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Having a baby is a gift from god in which we are all individually unique and the practice of human cloning should be banned.Keypoint: Cloning is unsafe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning could help scientists find cures for diseases and epidemics.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should not be prohibited because these are scientific advances that benefit humanityKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should be banned because it crosses too many moral and legal lines and truly offers no benefits to the one that is the clone.Keypoint: Cloning is unsafe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning goes against natural laws and should be banned.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should be banned as this is considered to be immoral to many religious people.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cloning humans is immoral and has potential large genetic abnormality risks. science does not know enough about genes to ensure they wont mutate into a catastrophic anomaly.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is messing with nature and also with some religion too and should be banned ad hock.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can aid in research for medical issues as well as preserving the continuation of humankind.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Copying something tends to weaken the original product and human cloning could cause defects that have never been seen before.Keypoint: Cloning is unsafe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban human cloning because it could help with medical researchKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should be banned because we don't know what the long term health effects are for a human being.Keypoint: Cloning is unnatural", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning will save millions of lives by using them as experimental subjects or for organ donationKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning not only can aid in securing the longevity of a familial line but aid in research to target diseases that can find a cure.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning helps science find new technologies.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is completely immoral because it turns people into commoditiesKeypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is immoral and should be banned.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning opens up a path never before filled with benefits for human beings, allowing in the future the eradication of many diseases.Keypoint: Cloning promotes health", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cloning might allow us to reproduce body parts such as livers, hearts, etc to help save lives of those who are desparately ill.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cloning science can lead to many other technological and medical breakthroughs that we would not have come across otherwise.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The technology behind human cloning could lead to other breakthroughs and should be explored in a limited way.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should not be prohibited because these are scientific advances that benefit humanityKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is a dangerous precedent that may eventually replace natural reproduction and lead to the downfall of societyKeypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban human cloning because cloning can help product better individuals which results in a better world.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can be used to clone organs that could potentially save their lives, as well as others.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Because it's unethical and unnaturalKeypoint: Cloning is unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning will allow for medical advances that can be used to improve the life of people with serious medical conditionsKeypoint: Cloning helps those who can’t otherwise have a child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can ensure that certain strengths of a human trait is continued therefore human cloning should be allowed to be accomplished.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The concept of human cloning is totally against human nature. this is tampering with things man wasn't meant to be involved with. it goes against god's will and should not happen.Keypoint: Cloning is unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban human cloning because it can possibly help with medical breakthroughsKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cloning humans is immoral and has potential large genetic abnormality risks. science does not know enough about genes to ensure they wont mutate into a catastrophic anomaly.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By advancing cloning, scientists will have as many people as they want to use as test subjects and can find things to better enhance ours lives.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can enable scientific research into genetic disorders, possibly paving the way for life-saving breakthroughs.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is a huge ethical dilemma on whether or not the clones have rights or even a right to live normallyKeypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is a huge ethical dilemma on whether or not the clones have rights or even a right to live normallyKeypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It can help with medical research and lead to the treatment and cures of many different diseases,Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is nothing more than playing god.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There our a lot of questions we should ask ourselves one is if a clone were to gain contusions does it have rights like self determination it could cause a lot of problemsKeypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It may lead to medical break throughsKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When you turn against nature, nature often fights back with severe consequences and human cloning is waging war against the natural order.Keypoint: Cloning is unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban human cloning because one day it is going to backfire and we will be creating monsters or otherwise, defected humans.Keypoint: Cloning is unsafe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is still somewhat new, making it dangerous for humans and should be bannedKeypoint: Cloning is unnatural", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can help infertile couples have childrenKeypoint: Cloning helps those who can’t otherwise have a child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban human cloning because it can save lives due to the possibility of cloning organs such as hearts.Keypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning will provide necessary organs when there are few resourcesKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A person created through cloning could potentially have developmental problems caused by imperfections in the cloning process.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The cloning of humans could help us get the cures we need and the most appropriate treatments for certain ailmentsKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning may have serious consequences such as cloning unhealthy cells and create humans that live very shortKeypoint: Cloning is unnatural", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should be banned because not enough research has been done around it.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We can learn a lot from cloning so it should be allowed to be exploredKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is sick and morally wrong.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is nothing more than playing god.Keypoint: Cloning is unsafe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should be banned because it interferes with natureKeypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Having a baby is a gift from god in which we are all individually unique and the practice of human cloning should be banned.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can lead to advancements in the field of genetics that will result in cures that we can only dream about at present.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can further medical science; cloning organs will relieve our overburdened need for donors.Keypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By trying to clone humans scientists are trying to play god. experimenting on humans and trying to duplicate them could lead to consequences we can not even predict today.Keypoint: Cloning is unnatural", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is completely immoral because it turns people into commoditiesKeypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning could cause major genetic mutations over a period of time.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban human cloning because the consequences of future catastrophes of illness has not been researched.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can ensure that certain strengths of a human trait is continued therefore human cloning should be allowed to be accomplished.Keypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The medical implications of cloning are unknown.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is an ethical nightmare - should people be allowed to clone themselves to harvest organs from their child?Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can be used to help find cures for, and prevent, hereditary diseases.Keypoint: Cloning helps those who can’t otherwise have a child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The concept of human cloning is totally against human nature. this is tampering with things man wasn't meant to be involved with. it goes against god's will and should not happen.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cloning may bring many useful benefits to society, notably for medical research.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is sick and morally wrong.Keypoint: Cloning is unsafe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't ban human cloning because it can help save people that might need organs, so having a transplant wont be a long waiting list.Keypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cloning may bring many useful benefits to society, notably for medical research.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should not be banned a sit can be valuable in medicine, for transplantation and experimentationKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can provide huge breakthroughs in the medical field.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning may result in mutations and double the population.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It could lead to medical advances good for humanityKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cloning could benefit those that are unable to have a child, it could be used to clone great thinkers of our time like einstein or other great people, it would advance science as well.Keypoint: Cloning helps those who can’t otherwise have a child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can provide huge breakthroughs in the medical field.Keypoint: Cloning promotes health", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should be prohibited because every human being is authentic and does not resemble anyone, god created unique and unrepeatable peopleKeypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can help us cure and/or eliminate many diseasesKeypoint: Cloning promotes health", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is still somewhat new, making it dangerous for humans and should be bannedKeypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is sick and morally wrong.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning makes it possible to make specific human body parts that a person's body would be less likely to reject.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can help people who need transplant organs as they can create clones of themselves.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are too many things that can go wrong and we should not allow human cloningKeypoint: Cloning is unsafe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can be a very effective way to develop medical scienceKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning opens up a whole new level of ethics, such as the rights of the clone, that we are unprepared to handle legally and morally.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It could lead to medical advances good for humanityKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The concept of human cloning is totally against human nature. this is tampering with things man wasn't meant to be involved with. it goes against god's will and should not happen.Keypoint: Cloning is unsafe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban human cloning as humans should not play god and it raises a moral issue.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can lead to discoveries that could cure some of the most fatal illnesses we have.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban human cloning because this will lessen our chances for finding cures to the some of the most deadly diseases such as cancer and dementiaKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cloning an individual human is dangerous to the individuality of both original and clone.Keypoint: Cloning is unsafe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning allows experimentation which might lead to the development of a more robust strain of human therefore it should not be banned.Keypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is an abomination and immoral, we should not be playing god.Keypoint: Cloning is unsafe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If human cloning can provide answers or cures to diseases, we should not ban it.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should be banned as the long term effects on the cloned is still uncertain and could lead to long term health complicationsKeypoint: Cloning is unnatural", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Scientific exploration should continue uninhibited.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is unethical. what would happen to the clones once they were created? harvest their organs and then what? euthanize them like garbage?Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning must be prohibited because it could be used in many things to commit crimesKeypoint: Cloning is unsafe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without knowing the long term effects of cloning, it shouldn't be attempted on humans because it could be medically problematic.Keypoint: Cloning is unnatural", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can lead to discoveries that could cure some of the most fatal illnesses we have.Keypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We ought not ban human cloning because think of how many scientific advancements could take place if they had clones to work withKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning opens up a path never before filled with benefits for human beings, allowing in the future the eradication of many diseases.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning will spread disease and cause abnormalities in the populationKeypoint: Cloning is unsafe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cloning would have strict regulations on how to handle clones and ethical dilemmas. scientific advancements made while working towards cloning can advance the human race.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By cloning humans we could provide more organs for sick people needing organs.Keypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Contamination can happen very easy, cloning a human with contaminated cells could lead to diseases with no cure being spread worldwideKeypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning could help people with infertility issues. they could potentially pick certain traits for their children. it would also advance science in genetic research.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can aid in research for medical issues as well as preserving the continuation of humankind.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can further medical science; cloning organs will relieve our overburdened need for donors.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is a huge ethical grey zone. we have no idea how this technology might affect someone's life, and the questionable moral involved shouldn't be messed with.Keypoint: Cloning is unnatural", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban human cloning because it could help with medical researchKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is messing with nature and also with some religion too and should be banned ad hock.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban human cloning since research into it may lead to important medical breakthroughs such as the ability to generate organs for transpantKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is a lot we can learn medically from human cloning and we should do it responsiblyKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is unnatural and could cause the demise of human beingsKeypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban human cloning as one of these days a freak is going to be created and that is not humane.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cloning could prevent defective genes from being passedKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is the future of medicine. cloned bodies and parts will save thousands of lives.Keypoint: Cloning helps those who can’t otherwise have a child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is the future of medicine. cloned bodies and parts will save thousands of lives.Keypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can provide huge breakthroughs in the medical field.Keypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban human cloning because it opens up many unethical ideas such as designer babies. also only the rich can afford it so the poor will be less, whilst the rich will be crafted.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban human cloning because it is against the natural law and it is morally wrongKeypoint: Cloning is unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban human cloning as humans should not play god and it raises a moral issue.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning goes against natural laws and should be banned.Keypoint: Cloning is unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It may lead to medical break throughsKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban human cloning because it can save lives due to the possibility of cloning organs such as hearts.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We can learn a lot from cloning so it should be allowed to be exploredKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban human cloning because it opens up many unethical ideas such as designer babies. also only the rich can afford it so the poor will be less, whilst the rich will be crafted.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should be banned because the ethical problems it creates are too difficult to overcomeKeypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban human cloning because it raises too many legal questions regarding ownership and identity.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is too risky and unethical. it's also unnecessary with the current science and technological advances. we can accomplish the same things that cloning can with 3d printing and other technologies.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Scientific exploration should continue uninhibited.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban human cloning because cloning can help product better individuals which results in a better world.Keypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban human cloning because such an act creates a lot of moral and ethical issues.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban human cloning because it's unnatural. the cloned person may also become distressed knowing they were cloned and feel like they don't have their own identity.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is unexplored territory and can have huge detrimental repercussions we are currently unaware ofKeypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Because it's unethical and unnaturalKeypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not be playing god. also, what if the wrong people were cloned such as hitler, manson, or other serial killers? this could be an absolute nightmare. very bad idea.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should be banned as the long term effects on the cloned is still uncertain and could lead to long term health complicationsKeypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cloning will restrict the gene pool, reduce genetic diversity and and encourage recessive traits, many of which lead to illness and abnormalities.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is akin to playing god and needs to be banned. there are too many potential down-sides to it.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should be banned as there is insufficient research into what might happen in the future with mutations, disease and genetic defaults being replicated.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban human cloning because it helps with medical researchKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can have great impact on the medical field, saving lives.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning would enable advances in medical research and shouldn't be banned.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They could provided vital research on curing diseases etcKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can help further scientific developments in curing diseasesKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning will lead to individuals that are seen more as property than sentient humans, which is unethical.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are too many things that can go wrong and we should not allow human cloningKeypoint: Cloning is unnatural", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can help doctors find a cure for illnesses we otherwise won't be able to surviveKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We have no right to play god, especially if the science falls into the wrong hands, we could end up creating a frankenstein's monster.Keypoint: Cloning is unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can be used to re-grow failed organs in the original person, thus possibly saving his life.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning could lead to a lot of advancements in the medical fieldKeypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cloning is controversial and it is against religious ethicsKeypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning not only can aid in securing the longevity of a familial line but aid in research to target diseases that can find a cure.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cloning would have strict regulations on how to handle clones and ethical dilemmas. scientific advancements made while working towards cloning can advance the human race.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning will allow for medical advances that can be used to improve the life of people with serious medical conditionsKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning opens up a whole new level of ethics, such as the rights of the clone, that we are unprepared to handle legally and morally.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By cloning humans we could provide more organs for sick people needing organs.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are to many ethical problems and it would be nearly impossible to regulateKeypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning may have serious consequences such as cloning unhealthy cells and create humans that live very shortKeypoint: Cloning is unsafe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning could save thousands of lives, as a person needing an organ transplant could have the organ cloned for them.Keypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is vital for medical science as it might be able to identify treatments and cures for diseasesKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should be banned as there is insufficient research into what might happen in the future with mutations, disease and genetic defaults being replicated.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning could lead to scientific breakthroughs that could solve many of the world's problems.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban human cloning since research into it may lead to important medical breakthroughs such as the ability to generate organs for transpantKeypoint: Cloning promotes health", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Contamination can happen very easy, cloning a human with contaminated cells could lead to diseases with no cure being spread worldwideKeypoint: Cloning is unsafe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cloning might allow us to reproduce body parts such as livers, hearts, etc to help save lives of those who are desparately ill.Keypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't ban human cloning because it can lead to a perfect human race without flawsKeypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The cloning of humans could help us get the cures we need and the most appropriate treatments for certain ailmentsKeypoint: Cloning helps those who can’t otherwise have a child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can be used to help find cures for, and prevent, hereditary diseases.Keypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we ban cloning we will not advance in science because we will be stopping a very important discovery.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should be banned because it interferes with natureKeypoint: Cloning is unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning provides a wonderful opportunity to test theories on health and medicine and should be encouraged not banned.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can lead to discoveries that could cure some of the most fatal illnesses we have.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning should be banned as it unnatural and there is no firm basis that displays the benefits that it can bringKeypoint: Cloning is unsafe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It could help lead the way to find a cure for certain diseasesKeypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning demonstrates how far our technology has advanced. it may lead to such wonders as being able to generate organs for transplantation, which can only be a positive thing.Keypoint: Cloning can be used to create more advanced humans", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can provide huge breakthroughs in the medical field.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is a huge ethical grey zone. we have no idea how this technology might affect someone's life, and the questionable moral involved shouldn't be messed with.Keypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't ban human cloning because it can help save people that might need organs, so having a transplant wont be a long waiting list.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Copying something tends to weaken the original product and human cloning could cause defects that have never been seen before.Keypoint: Cloning is unnatural", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can lead to discoveries that could cure some of the most fatal illnesses we have.Keypoint: Cloning helps those who can’t otherwise have a child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning can enable scientific research into genetic disorders, possibly paving the way for life-saving breakthroughs.Keypoint: Cloning promotes science/research", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is unethical and not how we were createdKeypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cloning of organs can and will save many lives, people who need organ transplants could be saved by cloning organs for them rather than waiting for others to die, cloned limbs would also help disabled people.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Because it's unethical and unnaturalKeypoint: Cloning is unsafe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is an experimental and untested area of science where the effects on those cloned is as yet unknown and could be life-threatening in a number of waysKeypoint: Cloning is unethical/anti-religious", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By trying to clone humans scientists are trying to play god. experimenting on humans and trying to duplicate them could lead to consequences we can not even predict today.Keypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning must be prohibited because it could be used in many things to commit crimesKeypoint: Cloning is not understood enough yet", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human cloning is the future of medicine. cloned bodies and parts will save thousands of lives.Keypoint: Cloning can be used for organ replication", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - } - ] -} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/tasks/task1293_kpa_keypoint_matching_military_companies_topic.json b/tasks/task1293_kpa_keypoint_matching_military_companies_topic.json deleted file mode 100644 index 79f6b1965..000000000 --- a/tasks/task1293_kpa_keypoint_matching_military_companies_topic.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,1863 +0,0 @@ -{ - "Contributors": [ - "Arjun Ashok" - ], - "Source": [ - "ArgKP (https://github.com/IBM/KPA_2021_shared_task)" - ], - "Definition": "The input contains an argument and a keypoint on the topic \"We should ban private military companies\", separated by \"\".Your task is to answer if the keypoint matches the argument and summarizes exactly what the argument means, in the context of this topic.", - "Categories": [ - "Classification -> Verification -> Summary Verification", - "Text Comparison" - ], - "Domains": [ - "Reviews", - "Law", - "Dialogue" - ], - "Input_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Output_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Instruction_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Positive Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are basically soldiers for hire, driven by money and nothing else.Keypoint: Private military companies main interest is profit", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that private military companies are basically soldiers for hire, driven by money and nothing else." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies have their bottom line as a priority rather than the safety of the country.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that private military companies have their bottom line as a priority rather than the safety of the country." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are dangerous. they fight for their bosses' interests, not the interest of the country.Keypoint: Private military companies cannot be trusted to be loyal to the hiring country", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that private military companies are dangerous. they fight for their bosses' interests, not the interest of the country." - } - ], - "Negative Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban private military companies because there is no way for governments to regulate and ensure the quality of private military companiesKeypoint: Private military companies are not professional", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that we should ban private military companies because there is no way for governments to regulate and ensure the quality of private military companies" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban private military companies, as soon as fighting is for financial gain rather than for your country and your freedom, the ethics of the military action are compromised.Keypoint: Private military companies solicit engaging, or prolonging, conflict", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that we should ban private military companies, as soon as fighting is for financial gain rather than for your country and your freedom, the ethics of the military action are compromised." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies fill a void in the security and protection of people and property. the can operate in a professional manner and assist persons and companies in protecting life and property.Keypoint: Private military companies are well-trained/better equipped", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that private military companies fill a void in the security and protection of people and property. the can operate in a professional manner and assist persons and companies in protecting life and property." - } - ], - "Instances": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Sometimes you have to rely on the private sector when the public isn't there to helpKeypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies do not have the same oversight as the armed forces so they can do what they want and this can lead to exploitation, profiteering and mistreatment of prisonersKeypoint: Private military companies cannot be trusted to be loyal to the hiring country", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Pmcs should be banned, as they are profiting from war and destruction. it is their interest to cause and prolong discord in the world.Keypoint: Private military companies are not professional", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies have no governmental controls and can attack people in their own country.Keypoint: Private military companies solicit engaging, or prolonging, conflict", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They are basically mercenaries and often violate international law.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are only interested in making money.Keypoint: Private military companies main interest is profit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies can access places where terrorists are without the constriction of global law.Keypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are basically soldiers for hire, driven by money and nothing else.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They provide useful additional support to armiesKeypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are no different to weapons manufacturers. they provide a necessary service for the military.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A private military company can provide a much more streamlined and money-saving operation versus government-owned entities, which are historically wasteful and inefficient.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies provide a valuable service assisting regular formations when it come to low-level concerns, freeing the army up from more mainstream activities and saving money.Keypoint: Private military companies increase safety", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are more efficient and better trained than the government run military.Keypoint: Private military companies are well-trained/better equipped", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies provide an armed protection for some that may not have it normallyKeypoint: Private military companies increase safety", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without private military companies, the military would be ill equipped and not able to get the tools they need,Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies operate without any oversight and are modern day mercenaries that answer to no one and strain relations with other nations.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies could lead to personal motives or agendas, which could be dangerous.Keypoint: Private military companies solicit engaging, or prolonging, conflict", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They are basically mercenaries and often violate international law.Keypoint: Private military companies are not professional", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sometimes you have to rely on the private sector when the public isn't there to helpKeypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies earn their profits from war. they do not work for a country but for whatever individuals hire them there really is not a good oversight for what these companies do.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban private military companies because it is unethical to be profiting off of war, which means the government has incentive to keep wars going for monetary reasonsKeypoint: Private military companies cannot be trusted to be loyal to the hiring country", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are dangerous. they fight for their bosses' interests, not the interest of the country.Keypoint: Private military companies are not professional", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies provide a valuable service assisting regular formations when it come to low-level concerns, freeing the army up from more mainstream activities and saving money.Keypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies have no oversight and thus can commit atrocities with no repercussions.Keypoint: Private military companies are not professional", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They can go where an official government entity cannotKeypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are trained for combat and can assist the governmental military groupsKeypoint: Private military companies increase safety", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies can have very specialized skills that the military can use so they can be helpfulKeypoint: Private military companies increase safety", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't ban private military because if there was a war then we need all the extra power that there is.Keypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private companies are able to be better funded than government militaries and therefore are better equiped for dangerous situationsKeypoint: Private military companies increase safety", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They may sell weapons to countries that would use them inappropriatelyKeypoint: Private military companies cannot be trusted to be loyal to the hiring country", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The do not abide by the same rules and regulations of a government run military and need to be banned.Keypoint: Private military companies are not professional", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies lack the principles and morality of legislated military and are more prone to commits war crimes.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private armies are necessary to enter in extremely dangerous conflict zones where the use of irregular soldiers is necessaryKeypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban private military companies as they do not abide by the same regulations and standards as state armies.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies provide essential services to the armed services so should be retained.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies only exist to continue and profit from warfare. their operations are immoral and unlawful.Keypoint: Private military companies are not professional", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies could be a danger to our national security because their motives are financial in nature which means they could act in ways that are not in our country's best interest politcally.Keypoint: Private military companies cannot be trusted to be loyal to the hiring country", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are more efficient and better trained than the government run military.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies provide additional soldiers in places where it is necessaryKeypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Military companies should not be banned because something things need to be private to keep certain information and things safe.Keypoint: Private military companies increase safety", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies provide invaluable assistance by attending to the more mundane tasks when and where it's required, this allows the main state military to concentrate on the most difficult tasks.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies take on missions when our military doesn't have enough manpower.Keypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies provide assistance in areas where there is an inadequate number of service personnelKeypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A private company's main interest is to profit and this can lead to bad practices or even corruption. they most definitely should not be trusted to run a military where life and death decisions need to be made.Keypoint: Private military companies solicit engaging, or prolonging, conflict", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban private military companies as they are often manned by ex-military members and as such are well trained and a useful addition to our normal military.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies take strain off of state military forces in active warzones.Keypoint: Private military companies are well-trained/better equipped", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies provide essential services to the armed services so should be retained.Keypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies should be banned as they have committed heinous acts against innocent people in places like iraq.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies can access places where terrorists are without the constriction of global law.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies hire dedicated people to become soldiers; they are likely more skilled than the kids we send out onto the battleground now.Keypoint: Private military companies are well-trained/better equipped", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban this because they cant be controlled and could turn against the government or people. they also might cause more problems then help solve them.Keypoint: Private military companies cannot be trusted to be loyal to the hiring country", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban private military companies because they can provide great protection in many areas of our countryKeypoint: Private military companies are well-trained/better equipped", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They are regulated differently and might not act according to standard rulesKeypoint: Private military companies cannot be trusted to be loyal to the hiring country", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private armies are necessary to enter in extremely dangerous conflict zones where the use of irregular soldiers is necessaryKeypoint: Private military companies are well-trained/better equipped", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are only in the business for profit and not for the \"best\" for our country in it's interests and private military companies should be banned.Keypoint: Private military companies main interest is profit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies provide assistance in areas where there is an inadequate number of service personnelKeypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies earn their profits from war. they do not work for a country but for whatever individuals hire them there really is not a good oversight for what these companies do.Keypoint: Private military companies main interest is profit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies offer a valuable service for instances where government military cannot do what needs to be done for fear or repercussions.Keypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban private military companies as they do not abide by the same regulations and standards as state armies.Keypoint: Private military companies are not professional", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are often run by former military men and women and provide a service that allows the military to concentrate on military operations.Keypoint: Private military companies are well-trained/better equipped", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies have no governmental controls and can attack people in their own country.Keypoint: Private military companies cannot be trusted to be loyal to the hiring country", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies have no oversight and thus can commit atrocities with no repercussions.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They provide a valuable service that goes above and beyond what our military can do.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Military companies should not be banned because something things need to be private to keep certain information and things safe.Keypoint: Private military companies are well-trained/better equipped", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are less likely to exercise proper discipline or follow ethical rules of engagement in warfare.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are not regulated by government and their code of conduct might be violating human rightsKeypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies specialize in services to help our military.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban private military companies because it is unethical to be profiting off of war, which means the government has incentive to keep wars going for monetary reasonsKeypoint: Private military companies main interest is profit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies only exist to continue and profit from warfare. their operations are immoral and unlawful.Keypoint: Private military companies cannot be trusted to be loyal to the hiring country", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is helpful that private military companies exist to support combatKeypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are just profiting on war and conflict. the company owners make loads of money and just send out people as cannon fodder for money.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies allow more investment than governments can afford and so are essential to future security and should not be banned.Keypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Military should only be government controlled to ensure action taken is not profit motivated but national security motivatedKeypoint: Private military companies main interest is profit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are less likely to exercise proper discipline or follow ethical rules of engagement in warfare.Keypoint: Private military companies cannot be trusted to be loyal to the hiring country", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The pay is good and they use new technolodgyKeypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies only purpose is to make money and as a result they don't focus on protection as much as they should be.Keypoint: Private military companies main interest is profit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies have their own agendas and are not always acting in our country's best interest.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies can go into areas and do things that we don't allow the government to do. therefore they add an extra layer of protection to society in addition to what the government can do.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies operate without any oversight and are modern day mercenaries that answer to no one and strain relations with other nations.Keypoint: Private military companies solicit engaging, or prolonging, conflict", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This helps cover more issues; the current government is too short staffed to deal with all of the problems.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban private military companies because they can provide great protection in many areas of our countryKeypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are no different to weapons manufacturers. they provide a necessary service for the military.Keypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies fill a void in the security and protection of people and property. the can operate in a professional manner and assist persons and companies in protecting life and property.Keypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban private military companies because there is no proper monitoring of their services in term of misconduct in handling certain issuesKeypoint: Private military companies cannot be trusted to be loyal to the hiring country", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies can go into areas and do things that we don't allow the government to do. therefore they add an extra layer of protection to society in addition to what the government can do.Keypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies could be a danger to our national security because their motives are financial in nature which means they could act in ways that are not in our country's best interest politcally.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies can serve as a deterrent to conflicts, increasing the chances of peace.Keypoint: Private military companies are well-trained/better equipped", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are unstable.Keypoint: Private military companies are not professional", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies provide weapons and other items needed by the military, without them, they would be ill equipped.Keypoint: Private military companies increase safety", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies can serve as a deterrent to conflicts, increasing the chances of peace.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They just care about money and usually not care about innocent civilians and people who safer in the war.Keypoint: Private military companies main interest is profit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies should be banned as they are not obliged to follow the strict rules of engagement that the military must which results in abuse of civilians.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This helps cover more issues; the current government is too short staffed to deal with all of the problems.Keypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are there for profit onlyKeypoint: Private military companies main interest is profit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies should be banned as they have committed heinous acts against innocent people in places like iraq.Keypoint: Private military companies are not professional", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When there is a shortage of military manpower, private military companies can fill the gaps.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are only interested in making money.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies take the pressure off government armies.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies can provide many security benefits within our countryKeypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies fill a void in the security and protection of people and property. the can operate in a professional manner and assist persons and companies in protecting life and property.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are needed to do the work that our soldiers should not doKeypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban private military companies as the national military is not able to perform smaller operations and should not be taken away from their national duties and responsibilities.Keypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They go against international laws and lead to an increase in violence and civilian casualties.Keypoint: Private military companies are not professional", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies can provide many security benefits within our countryKeypoint: Private military companies are well-trained/better equipped", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A private company's main interest is to profit and this can lead to bad practices or even corruption. they most definitely should not be trusted to run a military where life and death decisions need to be made.Keypoint: Private military companies are not professional", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies have their bottom line as a priority rather than the safety of the country.Keypoint: Private military companies main interest is profit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are unstable.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are fewer american casualties when using private military companies.Keypoint: Private military companies increase safety", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without private military companies, the military would be ill equipped and not able to get the tools they need,Keypoint: Private military companies are well-trained/better equipped", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies have an incentive to continue the military action so they should be bannedKeypoint: Private military companies solicit engaging, or prolonging, conflict", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies provide valuable services in areas that are not served by enough military personnelKeypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies do not have the same oversight as the armed forces so they can do what they want and this can lead to exploitation, profiteering and mistreatment of prisonersKeypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A private military company can provide a much more streamlined and money-saving operation versus government-owned entities, which are historically wasteful and inefficient.Keypoint: Private military companies are well-trained/better equipped", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies' primary goal is profit. they are not motivated by the desire to serve their nation. they are very difficult to regulate and to hold responsible for their actions.Keypoint: Private military companies main interest is profit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies take on missions when our military doesn't have enough manpower.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies can keep the costs down for the national military freeing up some of their resources.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies serve a purpose especially in war torn areas and a lot of military veteransKeypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They are regulated differently and might not act according to standard rulesKeypoint: Private military companies are not professional", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban private military companies as they shouldn't protect for financial gainKeypoint: Private military companies main interest is profit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban private military companies, as soon as fighting is for financial gain rather than for your country and your freedom, the ethics of the military action are compromised.Keypoint: Private military companies main interest is profit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies should be banned because it is immoral to make money off of warKeypoint: Private military companies main interest is profit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are needed to do the work that our soldiers should not doKeypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban private military companies because it is unethical to be profiting off of war, which means the government has incentive to keep wars going for monetary reasonsKeypoint: Private military companies are not professional", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies should be banned as they are not obliged to follow the strict rules of engagement that the military must which results in abuse of civilians.Keypoint: Private military companies cannot be trusted to be loyal to the hiring country", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies can be much more advanced and skilled than our current branches of the military.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies can have very specialized skills that the military can use so they can be helpfulKeypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The do not abide by the same rules and regulations of a government run military and need to be banned.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Having these forces, give a tactical advantage over any potential attack, your staff is constantly active and not making common life in the reserve.Keypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies help bring down the cost of military action by our government.Keypoint: Private military companies are well-trained/better equipped", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies provide invaluable assistance by attending to the more mundane tasks when and where it's required, this allows the main state military to concentrate on the most difficult tasks.Keypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are wrong and should be banned immediately. they are being paid to create war, not to help prevent it.Keypoint: Private military companies solicit engaging, or prolonging, conflict", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Pmcs should be banned, as they are profiting from war and destruction. it is their interest to cause and prolong discord in the world.Keypoint: Private military companies solicit engaging, or prolonging, conflict", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies can move more quickly and secretly than government troops.Keypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Military companies provide valuable expertise to supplement the armed forcesKeypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies do not have to go through governmental red tape to spend money for training and equipmentKeypoint: Private military companies increase safety", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies provide valuable security services, and can act as an overflow unit taking pressure from the regular army formations.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies provide weapons and other items needed by the military, without them, they would be ill equipped.Keypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are often run by former military men and women and provide a service that allows the military to concentrate on military operations.Keypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a private military company sends it's employees to dangerous places then it saves the lives of soldiers who won't be sent thereKeypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are not regulated by government and their code of conduct might be violating human rightsKeypoint: Private military companies are not professional", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are fewer american casualties when using private military companies.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are just profiting on war and conflict. the company owners make loads of money and just send out people as cannon fodder for money.Keypoint: Private military companies main interest is profit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies provide weapons and other items needed by the military, without them, they would be ill equipped.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies do not operate to the same code of conduct as regular forces thus could commit acts that could be viewed as war crimes.Keypoint: Private military companies are not professional", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Pmcs should be banned, as they are profiting from war and destruction. it is their interest to cause and prolong discord in the world.Keypoint: Private military companies main interest is profit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban private military companies because they can provide great protection in many areas of our countryKeypoint: Private military companies increase safety", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies can operate in ways to keep us safe that the government isn't allowed to.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We would not be able to oversee their operations and prevent them from unethical activities.Keypoint: Private military companies are not professional", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: These companies make millions in a private sector and they are not necessary.Keypoint: Private military companies main interest is profit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Military companies should not be banned because something things need to be private to keep certain information and things safe.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies abuse the locals and lack effective oversight so should be banned.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are only in it for the financial gainKeypoint: Private military companies main interest is profit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies should be banned because it is immoral to make money off of warKeypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies can keep the costs down for the national military freeing up some of their resources.Keypoint: Private military companies increase safety", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are only out for profit and not patriotism and should be banned.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies provide valuable security services, and can act as an overflow unit taking pressure from the regular army formations.Keypoint: Private military companies are well-trained/better equipped", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban private military companies as the national military is not able to perform smaller operations and should not be taken away from their national duties and responsibilities.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies tend to save the company hiring them money.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies can go into areas and do things that we don't allow the government to do. therefore they add an extra layer of protection to society in addition to what the government can do.Keypoint: Private military companies are well-trained/better equipped", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private companies should be free to organize and supplement whatever public services are available, including military.Keypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Pmcs should be banned, as they are profiting from war and destruction. it is their interest to cause and prolong discord in the world.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban private military companies because there is no way for governments to regulate and ensure the quality of private military companiesKeypoint: Private military companies cannot be trusted to be loyal to the hiring country", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are dangerous. they fight for their bosses' interests, not the interest of the country.Keypoint: Private military companies solicit engaging, or prolonging, conflict", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban private military companies because your contract can be bought at any moment by another company leading to instabilityKeypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They provide a valuable service when there are not enough people wanting to enlist in the armed forcesKeypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They go against international laws and lead to an increase in violence and civilian casualties.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies provide services that enhance security for american military and help fuel the economy as a bonus.Keypoint: Private military companies are well-trained/better equipped", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private armies are generally used to violate human rights because they are not subject to restrictions like current armiesKeypoint: Private military companies are not professional", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private armies are generally used to violate human rights because they are not subject to restrictions like current armiesKeypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies provide an armed protection for some that may not have it normallyKeypoint: Private military companies are well-trained/better equipped", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies do some of the work our soldiers do so they can concentrate on more important rolesKeypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They provide useful additional support to armiesKeypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies provide valuable security services, and can act as an overflow unit taking pressure from the regular army formations.Keypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The military is the last thing that should be profit driven, reliance on such companies can invoke catastrophe.Keypoint: Private military companies main interest is profit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies can serve as a deterrent to conflicts, increasing the chances of peace.Keypoint: Private military companies increase safety", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies only look towards making a profit not towards any patriotism.Keypoint: Private military companies main interest is profit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies have their own agendas and are not always acting in our country's best interest.Keypoint: Private military companies cannot be trusted to be loyal to the hiring country", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private companies should be free to organize and supplement whatever public services are available, including military.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban private military companies as they are often manned by ex-military members and as such are well trained and a useful addition to our normal military.Keypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They may sell weapons to countries that would use them inappropriatelyKeypoint: Private military companies are not professional", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are dangerous as their neutrality cannot be guaranteed. they may be open to counter offers for their services.Keypoint: Private military companies cannot be trusted to be loyal to the hiring country", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Having these forces, give a tactical advantage over any potential attack, your staff is constantly active and not making common life in the reserve.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private armies are necessary to enter in extremely dangerous conflict zones where the use of irregular soldiers is necessaryKeypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private miltary companies are open to abusing their privileges because they are not under the same direct scrutiny as the regular military.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The military is the last thing that should be profit driven, reliance on such companies can invoke catastrophe.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies give rise to some unethical practices as they are not under the same scrutiny as government military.Keypoint: Private military companies are not professional", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They provide a valuable service when there are not enough people wanting to enlist in the armed forcesKeypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies can do things the real military cannot, or be hired for short term assignments.Keypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies take the pressure off government armies.Keypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies can operate in ways to keep us safe that the government isn't allowed to.Keypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need the private military companies instead of having to exhaust our military and putting them in direct danger so that they can not protect our own country.Keypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are operated for profit rather than for the defence of nations.Keypoint: Private military companies main interest is profit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are dangerous as their neutrality cannot be guaranteed. they may be open to counter offers for their services.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies do not operate to the same code of conduct as regular forces thus could commit acts that could be viewed as war crimes.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Having these forces, give a tactical advantage over any potential attack, your staff is constantly active and not making common life in the reserve.Keypoint: Private military companies increase safety", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Pmcs should be banned as they exist only to profit from war, unrest and destruction. they are immoralKeypoint: Private military companies are not professional", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Pmcs should be banned, as they are profiting from war and destruction. it is their interest to cause and prolong discord in the world.Keypoint: Private military companies cannot be trusted to be loyal to the hiring country", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban private military companies because they help to protect peopleKeypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The fact that private military companies exist simply breeds the thoughts of violence and escalates the chances of conflict. we should not allow these companies to exist.Keypoint: Private military companies solicit engaging, or prolonging, conflict", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are often run by former military men and women and provide a service that allows the military to concentrate on military operations.Keypoint: Private military companies increase safety", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without private military companies the army wouldn't be able to provide enough personnel every day in crisis environments and therefore its essential they remain.Keypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are there for profit onlyKeypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies have an incentive to continue the military action so they should be bannedKeypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We would not be able to oversee their operations and prevent them from unethical activities.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies only look towards making a profit not towards any patriotism.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some private companies are irresponsible and inadequate and should be bannedKeypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies can save the government moneyKeypoint: Private military companies are well-trained/better equipped", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are needed to provide security when the military can not do the jobKeypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies help bring down the cost of military action by our government.Keypoint: Private military companies increase safety", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Military should only be government controlled to ensure action taken is not profit motivated but national security motivatedKeypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies take strain off of state military forces in active warzones.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies might be engaged in times of conflict when regular national military service is not eunoughKeypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: These companies make millions in a private sector and they are not necessary.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies can keep the costs down for the national military freeing up some of their resources.Keypoint: Private military companies are well-trained/better equipped", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is helpful that private military companies exist to support combatKeypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The fact that private military companies exist simply breeds the thoughts of violence and escalates the chances of conflict. we should not allow these companies to exist.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies do not have the same oversight as the armed forces so they can do what they want and this can lead to exploitation, profiteering and mistreatment of prisonersKeypoint: Private military companies solicit engaging, or prolonging, conflict", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are only in the business for profit and not for the \"best\" for our country in it's interests and private military companies should be banned.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without private military companies the army wouldn't be able to provide enough personnel every day in crisis environments and therefore its essential they remain.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies perpetuate war and should be bannedKeypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies give rise to some unethical practices as they are not under the same scrutiny as government military.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a private military company sends it's employees to dangerous places then it saves the lives of soldiers who won't be sent thereKeypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Military companies provide valuable expertise to supplement the armed forcesKeypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies do a good service by providing security where neededKeypoint: Private military companies increase safety", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies provide an armed protection for some that may not have it normallyKeypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies do a good service by providing security where neededKeypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies lack the principles and morality of legislated military and are more prone to commits war crimes.Keypoint: Private military companies are not professional", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban private military companies as they are not trained and subject to the same scrutiny as the military.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban private military companies since these private companies can do things their own way and are not controlled by the government. they can fill in spots the government doesn't address.Keypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They just care about money and usually not care about innocent civilians and people who safer in the war.Keypoint: Private military companies are not professional", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies can move more quickly and secretly than government troops.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies hire dedicated people to become soldiers; they are likely more skilled than the kids we send out onto the battleground now.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies can save the government moneyKeypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Having private military companies keeps ideas flowing and more exploration into new technology and weapons so it should not be banned.Keypoint: Private military companies are well-trained/better equipped", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies can have very specialized skills that the military can use so they can be helpfulKeypoint: Private military companies are well-trained/better equipped", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are needed to provide security when the military can not do the jobKeypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They provide useful additional support to armiesKeypoint: Private military companies are well-trained/better equipped", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The private military companies are owned by elites who bet on wars to obtain millions in profitsKeypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies perpetuate war and should be bannedKeypoint: Private military companies solicit engaging, or prolonging, conflict", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private miltary companies are open to abusing their privileges because they are not under the same direct scrutiny as the regular military.Keypoint: Private military companies are not professional", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies only purpose is to make money and as a result they don't focus on protection as much as they should be.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban private military companies because they help to protect peopleKeypoint: Private military companies increase safety", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban private military companies as they shouldn't protect for financial gainKeypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban private military companies as they are not trained and subject to the same scrutiny as the military.Keypoint: Private military companies are not professional", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need the private military companies instead of having to exhaust our military and putting them in direct danger so that they can not protect our own country.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are wrong and should be banned immediately. they are being paid to create war, not to help prevent it.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are around to make a profit and may do things that are dangerous in order to cut expensesKeypoint: Private military companies are not professional", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies' primary goal is profit. they are not motivated by the desire to serve their nation. they are very difficult to regulate and to hold responsible for their actions.Keypoint: Private military companies are not professional", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They provide a valuable service that goes above and beyond what our military can do.Keypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies can provide many security benefits within our countryKeypoint: Private military companies increase safety", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies take the pressure away from the regular military leaving them less thin on the ground.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are trained for combat and can assist the governmental military groupsKeypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are simply another one for a country to defend themselves against potential aggressors. if a company can perform a service and make money at it, good for them.Keypoint: Private military companies are well-trained/better equipped", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies can be much more advanced and skilled than our current branches of the military.Keypoint: Private military companies are well-trained/better equipped", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Pmcs should be banned as they exist only to profit from war, unrest and destruction. they are immoralKeypoint: Private military companies main interest is profit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban private military companies, as soon as fighting is for financial gain rather than for your country and your freedom, the ethics of the military action are compromised.Keypoint: Private military companies are not professional", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some private companies are irresponsible and inadequate and should be bannedKeypoint: Private military companies cannot be trusted to be loyal to the hiring country", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban private military companies as they are often manned by ex-military members and as such are well trained and a useful addition to our normal military.Keypoint: Private military companies increase safety", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies support the military in their job and free up more military personnel to do the job of the military.Keypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban private military companies because there is no proper monitoring of their services in term of misconduct in handling certain issuesKeypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies can operate in ways to keep us safe that the government isn't allowed to.Keypoint: Private military companies are well-trained/better equipped", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are operated for profit rather than for the defence of nations.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies specialize in services to help our military.Keypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies have no governmental controls and can attack people in their own country.Keypoint: Private military companies main interest is profit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private companies are able to be better funded than government militaries and therefore are better equiped for dangerous situationsKeypoint: Private military companies are well-trained/better equipped", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies might be engaged in times of conflict when regular national military service is not eunoughKeypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies serve a purpose especially in war torn areas and a lot of military veteransKeypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are only in it for the financial gainKeypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without private military companies the army wouldn't be able to provide enough personnel every day in crisis environments and therefore its essential they remain.Keypoint: Private military companies are well-trained/better equipped", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are trained for combat and can assist the governmental military groupsKeypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies provide a valuable service assisting regular formations when it come to low-level concerns, freeing the army up from more mainstream activities and saving money.Keypoint: Private military companies are well-trained/better equipped", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies do some of the work our soldiers do so they can concentrate on more important rolesKeypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies provide valuable services in areas that are not served by enough military personnelKeypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are only out for profit and not patriotism and should be banned.Keypoint: Private military companies main interest is profit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They can go where an official government entity cannotKeypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies can do things the real military cannot, or be hired for short term assignments.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies offer a valuable service for instances where government military cannot do what needs to be done for fear or repercussions.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies tend to save the company hiring them money.Keypoint: Private military companies are well-trained/better equipped", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies help bring down the cost of military action by our government.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies take strain off of state military forces in active warzones.Keypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are fewer american casualties when using private military companies.Keypoint: Private military companies are well-trained/better equipped", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies operate without any oversight and are modern day mercenaries that answer to no one and strain relations with other nations.Keypoint: Private military companies main interest is profit", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Having private military companies keeps ideas flowing and more exploration into new technology and weapons so it should not be banned.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban private military companies since these private companies can do things their own way and are not controlled by the government. they can fill in spots the government doesn't address.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without private military companies, the military would be ill equipped and not able to get the tools they need,Keypoint: Private military companies increase safety", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They are not held accountable in the same way regular armies are. it has been reported that some of these companies don't follow the rules of engagement thus committing crimes.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't ban private military because if there was a war then we need all the extra power that there is.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When there is a shortage of military manpower, private military companies can fill the gaps.Keypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies support the military in their job and free up more military personnel to do the job of the military.Keypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban private military companies because your contract can be bought at any moment by another company leading to instabilityKeypoint: Private military companies cannot be trusted to be loyal to the hiring country", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies take the pressure away from the regular military leaving them less thin on the ground.Keypoint: Private military companies can supplement regular armies in specific tasks that armies cannot, or do not want, to do", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban this because they cant be controlled and could turn against the government or people. they also might cause more problems then help solve them.Keypoint: Private military companies are less ethical and violate rights or commit crimes", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The pay is good and they use new technolodgyKeypoint: Private military companies are well-trained/better equipped", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The private military companies are owned by elites who bet on wars to obtain millions in profitsKeypoint: Private military companies main interest is profit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies abuse the locals and lack effective oversight so should be banned.Keypoint: Private military companies are not professional", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies provide additional soldiers in places where it is necessaryKeypoint: Hiring private military companies is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A private company's main interest is to profit and this can lead to bad practices or even corruption. they most definitely should not be trusted to run a military where life and death decisions need to be made.Keypoint: Private military companies main interest is profit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies are around to make a profit and may do things that are dangerous in order to cut expensesKeypoint: Private military companies main interest is profit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Private military companies only exist to continue and profit from warfare. their operations are immoral and unlawful.Keypoint: Private military companies main interest is profit", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They are not held accountable in the same way regular armies are. it has been reported that some of these companies don't follow the rules of engagement thus committing crimes.Keypoint: Private military companies are not professional", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - } - ] -} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/tasks/task1294_kpa_keypoint_matching_child_actors_topic.json b/tasks/task1294_kpa_keypoint_matching_child_actors_topic.json deleted file mode 100644 index 18a6b1253..000000000 --- a/tasks/task1294_kpa_keypoint_matching_child_actors_topic.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2841 +0,0 @@ -{ - "Contributors": [ - "Arjun Ashok" - ], - "Source": [ - "ArgKP (https://github.com/IBM/KPA_2021_shared_task)" - ], - "Definition": "The input contains an argument and a keypoint on the topic \"We should ban the use of child actors\", separated by \"\".Your task is to answer if the keypoint matches the argument and summarizes exactly what the argument means, in the context of this topic.", - "Categories": [ - "Classification -> Verification -> Summary Verification", - "Text Comparison" - ], - "Domains": [ - "Reviews", - "Law", - "Dialogue" - ], - "Input_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Output_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Instruction_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Positive Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: So few child actors go on to have a stable childhood and normal adulthood having lived in the artificial world of show business.Keypoint: Child performers tend to develop problems later in life", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that so few child actors go on to have a stable childhood and normal adulthood having lived in the artificial world of show business." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are many protections available for child actors to permit them to work and be safeKeypoint: Child performers should not be banned as long as there is supervision/regulation", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that there are many protections available for child actors to permit them to work and be safe" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Being able to portray children is an important part of today's media. there are already sufficient regulations in place to ensure the safety of the actors, and it gives children a financial head start.Keypoint: The parents should decide for their child", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that being able to portray children is an important part of today's media. there are already sufficient regulations in place to ensure the safety of the actors, and it gives children a financial head start." - } - ], - "Negative Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Because many child actors end up pscyhologically damaged and neglected, ruining the rest of their livesKeypoint: Child performers tend to develop problems later in life", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that because many child actors end up pscyhologically damaged and neglected, ruining the rest of their lives" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are needed to portray children in movies and shows. we can't ban them.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that child actors are needed to portray children in movies and shows. we can't ban them." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The use of child actors shall be banned because fame at a young age rarely results in a normal healthy lifeKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that the use of child actors shall be banned because fame at a young age rarely results in a normal healthy life" - } - ], - "Instances": [ - { - "input": "Argument: As long as it doesn't interfere with their schooling and they are well looked after i don't see a problem.Keypoint: Child performers should not be banned as long as there is supervision/regulation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are needed to ply childrens rolesKeypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many child actors aren't taught how to cope with fame and end up turning to drugs and alcohol which is bad for them.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The use of child actors shold be banned because while they are working they are not getting the education they will most likely need to get on in adult lifeKeypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are useful as it allows these children to earn a living doing something they enjoy.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Kids whose parents pushed them into acting never had a choice, and worse, they never had the chance to be a kid.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Who or what would they use instead of a child actor?as long as the child works regular hours and still goes to school what is the problem?Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we don't have child actors then we cannot create movies and dramas that other children can relate to.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are needed to portray children in movies and shows. we can't ban them.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Acting takes children away from their education and normal childhood pursuitsKeypoint: Child performers tend to develop problems later in life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban the use of child actors because it exposed them to the horrors of the entertainment industry and cause drug addictions or mental issues when they get olderKeypoint: Child performers tend to develop problems later in life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are more safe guards than ever before in the hollywood industry to keep children safe while acting.Keypoint: Child performers should not be banned as long as there is supervision/regulation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are needed to play the roles of childrenKeypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are necessary and children can learn how to work even from an early ageKeypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Who or what would they use instead of a child actor?as long as the child works regular hours and still goes to school what is the problem?Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a parent sees that their child has the ability to get into the entertainment business at an early age, it should be encouraged. everyone wants a better life and if they can start early, great.Keypoint: The parents should decide for their child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children in film and tv are regularly exploited and ill-treated by vain and self serving producers who have no ongoing concern for the well being of their young charges and so they should not be usedKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban the use of child actors because they should be in school and learningKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The use of child actors should be banned to end the exploitation.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are important so programs can show people of ages and are reflective of society. child actors are an important part of the industry and are needed to reflect people accurately.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Look at the tragedies of numerous child stars, it is very rare a child actor doesn't face trouble and actually become successful adults.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban the use of child actors since it puts so much pressure on them. they should be growing up with a stable life and just enjoy being a kid.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Acting is very trying. it places a huge strain on children, and many end up being abused or using drugs to escape the pressure.Keypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: As long as protections are in place to care for vulnerable youngsters, child actors can be just as fulfilled and respected as their eldersKeypoint: Child performers should not be banned as long as there is supervision/regulation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors should be banned as they are not given a chance to live a normal lifeKeypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban the use of child actors because then no movies would have children in themKeypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Acting is an exhausting profession and deprives children of their childhoodKeypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children should be free to have fun and enjoy life not made to work in hire pressure situations so we should ban the use of child actors.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many child actors are put under a huge amount of pressure to perform well and can be denied most of their childhood by unscrupulous adults that only want to profit from their talents.Keypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors will do just fine with proper supervision and regulationKeypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban the use of child actors as this is exploitation of children who, probably, are forced into working rather than choosing to.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Acting takes away the opportunity for a child to be able to live their lives like a normal childKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It's the parents' decision whether a child actsKeypoint: The parents should decide for their child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are vital to the entertainment industry.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors can secure a future for college with the earnings they make and can be protected by family and managers to insure their safety in their young acting careers.Keypoint: Child performers should not be banned as long as there is supervision/regulation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Acting can be an amazing opportunity for children which could potentially lead to a full career.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are often exploited by the film industry or their own parents.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: As long as regulations are followed to protect the children, it should be allowed. they have an opportunity to save money for a head start on adulthood.Keypoint: Child performers should not be banned as long as there is supervision/regulation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban the use of child actors because it is a form of brainwashing, exploitation and only exposing them to pedophiles out thereKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children are often used by their parents to make money just because they have a natural ability to act.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are treated as adults and miss out on the social and emotional maturity process that children need to become healthy adults.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban the use of child actors because they should be in school and learningKeypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors often become ill adjusted adults and often fall into substance abuseKeypoint: Child performers tend to develop problems later in life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are really doing labor and child labor is against the law.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Acting can be a very prosperous career, and it would be a shame to take this option away if a child is truly willing to do it.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There have been many cases of child actors who end up addicted to drugs or alcoholKeypoint: Child performers tend to develop problems later in life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many children have a love of and a desire to go into acting and should not be prevented from doing so.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Tv shows and movies need child actors to tell stories.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It would be strange if no movies had children in them.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Tv shows and movies need child actors to tell stories.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Movies and shows without children in them would feel incomplete and unrealistic.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors too often grow up to be very troubled adults. this is unfair to them and as such, we should ban the use of child actors.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: As long as protections are in place to care for vulnerable youngsters, child actors can be just as fulfilled and respected as their eldersKeypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There have been many cases of child actors who end up addicted to drugs or alcoholKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors do not get a proper education and as such, the use of child actors should be bannedKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors too often grow up to be very troubled adults. this is unfair to them and as such, we should ban the use of child actors.Keypoint: Child performers tend to develop problems later in life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are often exploited by the film industry or their own parents.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We can't ban the usage of child actors because these talented children have the right to perform and earn money. this early acting can lead them to stardom which might not otherwise occur later.Keypoint: Child performers achieve success/confidence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The use of child actors exploits a child and can have negative effects on themKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban child actors as a part of banning child labour. exploitation of a child through working is wrong regardless of the specific job roleKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are forced to grow up way too fast, they are thrown into a world of drugs and sex at an early age. kids should be away from all that until hollywood is safe for them.Keypoint: Child performers have a lot of pressure", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children play important roles in many television shows and movies. it would be a great loss not to have them performing.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors can make a good amount of money for their future doing something they enjoyKeypoint: Child performers achieve success/confidence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Movies and shows without children in them would feel incomplete and unrealistic.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban the use of child actors because it forces them to grow up too quick and could damage them when they get older.Keypoint: Child performers tend to develop problems later in life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are exposed to too much of an adult world and are at a greater risk of being exposed to drugs and drink. many former child actors have ended up as addicts because of this.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children are naive and are often manipulated or not given fair compensationKeypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children need to be in school and with their families not workingKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are needed for many roles in the television and movie industry.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If children are spending there time acting this will detract from their education as they will not have enough time to study.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are necessary and children can learn how to work even from an early ageKeypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents often force their children into acting for their own selfish reasonsKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are carefully monitored and protected by current laws and should not be banned.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban the use of child actors because it is important for them to concentrate on education and making money and fame at a young age can be harmful.Keypoint: Child performers have a lot of pressure", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban the use of child actors because children many times are part of a television or movie script. as long as the child actor has parental guidance, everything is fine.Keypoint: The parents should decide for their child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are at risk for abuse mentally and sexually which will destroy their development in lifeKeypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Acting puts too much pressure on children and they are too young to handle itKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are subjected to far too much pressure and are unable to live a normal life playing with friends and going to school. this pressure normally leads to health problems in later life.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors can be overworked and they can miss out on their education.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subjecting children to the pressures of television and movies increases the chances that said child will grow up to have a substance abuse problem to cope with the pressuresKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children often can not handle the fame and have issues growing up including drug useKeypoint: Child performers tend to develop problems later in life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a child wants to act they have every right toKeypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are fine to use as long as there is a responsible adult watching them.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: And if we forbid it, who will play the role of the children? this is a decision only of parents and children, the government should not get involvedKeypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors become adults far too quickly and should not be allowed to act until they are adultsKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban the use of child actors because it is important for them to concentrate on education and making money and fame at a young age can be harmful.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are needed for roles that could not be fulfilled by adults so banning their use would be impossible.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children are taken advantage of by adults who are just concerned about making moneyKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban the use of child actors as parents have the right to determine if their child is able to successfully act in a capacity it does them no harm.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children should be learning and playing, not workingKeypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Acting at a young age not only gives a child the experience that is needed but it also gives them confidence as well as making money that they can use for later on in lifeKeypoint: Child performers achieve success/confidence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban the use of child actors as many are talented actors who enjoy performing and can use this as a stepping stone to an adult career.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is no logical reason to ban the use of child actors, they have protections so they are not overworked.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Are we going to make movies without children at all? banning child actors does not seem reasonable in this billion dollar industry.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors should not be banned because who else would play the children in movies? and that cannot be avoided because children are a part of life, and therefore, part of many stories.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: How are you going to make tv shows and movies without children?Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a child wishes to be an actor and they are given time to be a child, then it should be allowed.Keypoint: Child performers achieve success/confidence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The use of child actors should be banned to end the exploitation.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Too much fame at a young age has proven to have ruined many livesKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: And if we forbid it, who will play the role of the children? this is a decision only of parents and children, the government should not get involvedKeypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are important so programs can show people of ages and are reflective of society. child actors are an important part of the industry and are needed to reflect people accurately.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors lose the sense of a proper childhood.Keypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't ban the use of child actors because it is a way for children to find a career early in their lifeKeypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Use of child actors gives us a lot of great shows we wouldn't have if there were not child actorsKeypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children should be free to do what they want with their consent and their parents consentKeypoint: The parents should decide for their child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors become adults far too quickly and should not be allowed to act until they are adultsKeypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without child actors there will be no characters for actual children to relate toKeypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are able to access school work on set, and have a protected upbringing. there is no need to ban the use of children in tv and films as there is no harm caused.Keypoint: Child performers should not be banned as long as there is supervision/regulation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They are given a wonderful opportunity to provide their own wealth for when they are adults as well as the opportunity to have valuable life experience in acting.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Being able to portray children is an important part of today's media. there are already sufficient regulations in place to ensure the safety of the actors, and it gives children a financial head start.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children provide unique storytelling opportunities for movies and should not be banned as long as they are properly raised and cared for.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Placing pressure and fame upon someone so young as been shown to cause mental problems in later life.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors should not be banned because who else would play the children in movies? and that cannot be avoided because children are a part of life, and therefore, part of many stories.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If acting is their passion they should be able to pursue that no matter what their ageKeypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A talented child should be able to pursue their dreams and help make a story come to life.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The role of a child actor cannot be fulfilled by adults to cannot possibly be banned.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors do not have a normal upbringing or education due to the nature of their work taking them far and wide to work which is detrimental to their wellbeing.Keypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many films and television shows have child roles which could only be filled by children. as long as the children are protected it means that the finished product will have higher artistic integrity.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subjecting children to the pressures of television and movies increases the chances that said child will grow up to have a substance abuse problem to cope with the pressuresKeypoint: Child performers tend to develop problems later in life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't ban the use of child actors because it lets kids follow their dream of acting early on and can lead to an early retirementKeypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is not right to ban child actors if the child wishes to go to work in that field and achieve their wishes and progress.Keypoint: Child performers achieve success/confidence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A talented child should be able to pursue their dreams and help make a story come to life.Keypoint: Child performers achieve success/confidence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Acting can be an amazing opportunity for children which could potentially lead to a full career.Keypoint: Child performers achieve success/confidence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban child actors because many of them end up having troubles later in life and they are put at risk when they are on sets instead of being with people their own age.Keypoint: Child performers tend to develop problems later in life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They dont get the formal education that other children get and they might be too tired to study which might affect them academicallyKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are exploited both by parents and the video industry, children should study and grow without workingKeypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors do not get to live a proper young persons life and experience childhood play, education and social interaction, so should be bannedKeypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: As long as child actors are protected and monitored, their participation in the acting industry should be allowed.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban the use of child actors because it is important for them to concentrate on education and making money and fame at a young age can be harmful.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are often exploited by the film industry and should not be usedKeypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should prohibit this because it affects the development and normal behavior of childrenKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children are vulnerable to being exploited by greedy entertainment corporation and are not protected from the dangers of the industry so we should ban child actors.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors should be banned as they miss out on growing up properly in a stable family environment and get adequate education.Keypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors do not get to have real childhoods.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban the use of child actors because then movies and sows wouldn't have any children in themKeypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Because many child actors end up pscyhologically damaged and neglected, ruining the rest of their livesKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many child actors aren't taught how to cope with fame and end up turning to drugs and alcohol which is bad for them.Keypoint: Child performers tend to develop problems later in life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are exposed to too much of an adult world and are at a greater risk of being exposed to drugs and drink. many former child actors have ended up as addicts because of this.Keypoint: Child performers tend to develop problems later in life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children should grow up going to school with their peers and playing with neighborhood friends. child actors are taken out of this environment and made to work in an adult environment.Keypoint: Child performers have a lot of pressure", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are robbed of their childhood and can face much emotional turmoil as an adult from missing this important step in childhood.Keypoint: Child performers have a lot of pressure", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children should be able to live a normal childhood instead of having to miss out on many things. in a way, it is a form of child labor.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Acting is an art and not a job so banning the use of children in acting roles is preventing children from exploring their creative ability in that area and should not be banned.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many child actors are put under a huge amount of pressure to perform well and can be denied most of their childhood by unscrupulous adults that only want to profit from their talents.Keypoint: Child performers tend to develop problems later in life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Acting exposes children to a variety of people and places, giving them valuable life experience they would not receive otherwise.Keypoint: Child performers achieve success/confidence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Acting is very trying. it places a huge strain on children, and many end up being abused or using drugs to escape the pressure.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Using child actors is exploitative and should be viewed as the same as child labor.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban the use of child actors because it strips them of childhood, let them be children and play and mess aroundKeypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children should not be made to work because there parents want to benefit from them. by banning child actors we will ban parent's profits over childhood.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't ban the use of child actors. i think this role can be good for children, it opens up career doors, and who would fill all the roles that need a child not an adult..Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are needed to play the roles of childrenKeypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are needed to ply childrens rolesKeypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are many protections available for child actors to permit them to work and be safeKeypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If children are spending there time acting this will detract from their education as they will not have enough time to study.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors do not have a normal upbringing or education due to the nature of their work taking them far and wide to work which is detrimental to their wellbeing.Keypoint: Child performers tend to develop problems later in life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors should be banned because the children are often exploited for their roles and because they end up with more money than they know what to do with and often squander it on drugs and other vices.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Banning child actors would be denying many very talented young individuals from becoming something great from an early age.Keypoint: Child performers achieve success/confidence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without child actors there wouldn't be any films that children can relate to. they need to see their own peers in situations they can comprehend.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors do not get a proper education and as such, the use of child actors should be bannedKeypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: For a parent to basically sell their child out as labor for their own purposes is wrong. children should be allowed to grow up in a normal environment.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors do not get to have real childhoods.Keypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban the use of child actors because it strips them of childhood, let them be children and play and mess aroundKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should prohibit this because it affects the development and normal behavior of childrenKeypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors often become ill adjusted adults and often fall into substance abuseKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This is child labor and child labor is illegal.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors lose their childhood by working at such a young age, growing up in a stressful, toxic environment, instead of a loving family.Keypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are notorious for being groomed by the industry and abused. we must keep them safe.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children should be able to live a normal childhood instead of having to miss out on many things. in a way, it is a form of child labor.Keypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It would be strange if no movies had children in them.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban the use of child actors because it is a form of brainwashing, exploitation and only exposing them to pedophiles out thereKeypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are protected by stringent health and safety regulations, they have to still receive schooling and the money they earn means they will be able to do the things they want as adults.Keypoint: Child performers should not be banned as long as there is supervision/regulation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors do not have a normal upbringing or education due to the nature of their work taking them far and wide to work which is detrimental to their wellbeing.Keypoint: Child performers have a lot of pressure", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are more safe guards than ever before in the hollywood industry to keep children safe while acting.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The use of child actors is well regulated enough that there are no serious harms.Keypoint: Child performers should not be banned as long as there is supervision/regulation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are enough rules and policies in place to protect child actors, making it a safe professionKeypoint: Child performers should not be banned as long as there is supervision/regulation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban child actors as a part of banning child labour. exploitation of a child through working is wrong regardless of the specific job roleKeypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: To tell a story in theater or movies we need children actors. without them stories could only be about adults. stories that have entertained us from lassie to mary poppins would not exist.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It's necessary to have children in tv shows and movies and therefore banning them from acting makes no sense.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Banning child actors would impose serious limitations on the entertainment industry.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors should be banned because the children are often exploited for their roles and because they end up with more money than they know what to do with and often squander it on drugs and other vices.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children are far too easy to exploit and they sometimes end up being far too precocious at an early age due to fame and all it brings.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The use of child actors helps the children learn a profession or skill that they can use to be a productive part of society.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban the use of child actors because even from a young age, some people know that acting is a career they legitimately want to pursue. they're not being forced into it.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If parents agree for their kids to do acting, i can`t see any problem with it.Keypoint: The parents should decide for their child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are an important part of the acting industry and should continue to be allowed with restrictions to ensure the child's well being.Keypoint: Child performers should not be banned as long as there is supervision/regulation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors do not have a normal upbringing or education due to the nature of their work taking them far and wide to work which is detrimental to their wellbeing.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Kids whose parents pushed them into acting never had a choice, and worse, they never had the chance to be a kid.Keypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are often pushed into this by their parents who take their money.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The use of child actors should not be banned because there are many acting roles for children that would not otherwise be accurately portrayedKeypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many child actors are put under a huge amount of pressure to perform well and can be denied most of their childhood by unscrupulous adults that only want to profit from their talents.Keypoint: Child performers have a lot of pressure", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors get exploited in hollywood and this ban would stop that.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are forced to grow up way too fast, they are thrown into a world of drugs and sex at an early age. kids should be away from all that until hollywood is safe for them.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are too often exploited and abused in one way or another, creating too many problem adults or early deaths and as such, we should strive to eliminate their use.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban the use of child actors because children many times are part of a television or movie script. as long as the child actor has parental guidance, everything is fine.Keypoint: Child performers should not be banned as long as there is supervision/regulation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are protected by stringent health and safety regulations, they have to still receive schooling and the money they earn means they will be able to do the things they want as adults.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children are often used by their parents to make money just because they have a natural ability to act.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Acting takes children away from their education and normal childhood pursuitsKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors can secure a future for college with the earnings they make and can be protected by family and managers to insure their safety in their young acting careers.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban the use of child actors as parents have the right to determine if their child is able to successfully act in a capacity it does them no harm.Keypoint: The parents should decide for their child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If they want to be an actor it is their choiceKeypoint: Child performers achieve success/confidence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The usage of child actors should not be banned as they are an important part of the acting field they have adults who can make rationale decisions for them.Keypoint: Child performers achieve success/confidence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are all too often traumatised or abused so their use should be banned.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children are taken advantage of by adults who are just concerned about making moneyKeypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Tv and theatre will always have a need for child actors, as long as it doesn't interfere with their education or place too much demands on them, then it shouldn't be a problem.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a child wishes to act and the mother and father agree they ought to be permitted to act because there are rules to protect them at workKeypoint: Child performers should not be banned as long as there is supervision/regulation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children often can not handle the fame and have issues growing up including drug useKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Kids are very important to movies and tv shows. without them it would be dull. they are home schooled and get the education they need and it gives them an early start to fame.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors can secure a future for college with the earnings they make and can be protected by family and managers to insure their safety in their young acting careers.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't ban the use of child actors as it builds skills and teaches them how to listen to instructionsKeypoint: Child performers achieve success/confidence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are notorious for being groomed by the industry and abused. we must keep them safe.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Look at the tragedies of numerous child stars, it is very rare a child actor doesn't face trouble and actually become successful adults.Keypoint: Child performers tend to develop problems later in life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors should be banned as they are not given a chance to live a normal lifeKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Acting is an exhausting profession and deprives children of their childhoodKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are an important part of the acting industry and should continue to be allowed with restrictions to ensure the child's well being.Keypoint: The parents should decide for their child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban the use of child actors because they belong in schoolKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: For a parent to basically sell their child out as labor for their own purposes is wrong. children should be allowed to grow up in a normal environment.Keypoint: Child performers tend to develop problems later in life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors do not have a normal upbringing or education due to the nature of their work taking them far and wide to work which is detrimental to their wellbeing.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The use of child actors should not be banned because there are many acting roles for children that would not otherwise be accurately portrayedKeypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are put in situation vulnerable to predators, miss opportunities of education as well as being able to form solcial bonds in the everyday world.Keypoint: Child performers have a lot of pressure", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban the use of child actors because then movies and sows wouldn't have any children in themKeypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are exploited by adults and should be bannedKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are robbed of their childhood and can face much emotional turmoil as an adult from missing this important step in childhood.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The usage of child actors should not be banned as they are an important part of the acting field they have adults who can make rationale decisions for them.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: With the proper support system and watch dogs, we can provide healthy environments for child actors.Keypoint: Child performers should not be banned as long as there is supervision/regulation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Banning child actors would be denying many very talented young individuals from becoming something great from an early age.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors can be overworked and they can miss out on their education.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a child wants to act they have every right toKeypoint: Child performers achieve success/confidence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a parent sees that their child has the ability to get into the entertainment business at an early age, it should be encouraged. everyone wants a better life and if they can start early, great.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: As long as regulations are followed to protect the children, it should be allowed. they have an opportunity to save money for a head start on adulthood.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Tv and theatre will always have a need for child actors, as long as it doesn't interfere with their education or place too much demands on them, then it shouldn't be a problem.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The use of child actors should be banned because the work takes them from the education they will most likely need to obtain gainful employment in adult lifeKeypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban child actors because it would look weird if a 40 year old man was playing a child in a film.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are too often exploited and abused in one way or another, creating too many problem adults or early deaths and as such, we should strive to eliminate their use.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If parents agree for their children to acting in movies, can`t see any problem with it.Keypoint: The parents should decide for their child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are subjected to far too much pressure and are unable to live a normal life playing with friends and going to school. this pressure normally leads to health problems in later life.Keypoint: Child performers have a lot of pressure", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't ban the use of child actors because it is a way for children to find a career early in their lifeKeypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are exploited by adults and should be bannedKeypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors can be overworked and they can miss out on their education. this can lead to difficulties in later life if they don't graduate school with any qualifications.Keypoint: Child performers have a lot of pressure", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban the use of child actors because children many times are part of a television or movie script. as long as the child actor has parental guidance, everything is fine.Keypoint: Child performers achieve success/confidence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban the use of child actors because it would be awfully strange to watch programs and never see a child as that is not real life.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children should be allowed to grow up at their own pace, child actors have an abnormal upbringing and are exposed to things at an early age which makes it difficult for them to then lead a normal life.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The use of child actors exploits a child and can have negative effects on themKeypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a child is passionate about acting they should be allowed to pursue that dreamKeypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban the use of child actors since it puts so much pressure on them. they should be growing up with a stable life and just enjoy being a kid.Keypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban the use of child actors because children many times are part of a television or movie script. as long as the child actor has parental guidance, everything is fine.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban child actors because many of them end up having troubles later in life and they are put at risk when they are on sets instead of being with people their own age.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are often pushed into this by their parents who take their money.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors have far wider experiences than other children giving them confidence and money that can enhance their adult lives.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children do not have the maturity level to decide if a life in the entertainment field is something they want. it gets pushed by their parents while the child is possibly not prepared for that life.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children do not have the maturity level to decide if a life in the entertainment field is something they want. it gets pushed by their parents while the child is possibly not prepared for that life.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban the use of child actors because it takes away their childhood and innocence and forces them to grow up too fast.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The use of child actors is well regulated enough that there are no serious harms.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: For a parent to basically sell their child out as labor for their own purposes is wrong. children should be allowed to grow up in a normal environment.Keypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children need to be in school and with their families not workingKeypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: For a parent to basically sell their child out as labor for their own purposes is wrong. children should be allowed to grow up in a normal environment.Keypoint: Child performers have a lot of pressure", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban child actors because it would look weird if a 40 year old man was playing a child in a film.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban the use of child actors because it exposed them to the horrors of the entertainment industry and cause drug addictions or mental issues when they get olderKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are subjected to far too much pressure and are unable to live a normal life playing with friends and going to school. this pressure normally leads to health problems in later life.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Using child actors is exploitative and should be viewed as the same as child labor.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Acting may be a dream for a child and we do not want to crush their dreams.Keypoint: Child performers achieve success/confidence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are useful as it allows these children to earn a living doing something they enjoy.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is no logical reason to ban the use of child actors, they have protections so they are not overworked.Keypoint: Child performers should not be banned as long as there is supervision/regulation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Being able to portray children is an important part of today's media. there are already sufficient regulations in place to ensure the safety of the actors, and it gives children a financial head start.Keypoint: Child performers should not be banned as long as there is supervision/regulation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is not right to ban child actors if the child wishes to go to work in that field and achieve their wishes and progress.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Acting takes away the opportunity for a child to be able to live their lives like a normal childKeypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are treated poorly in the industry.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are needed for many roles in the television and movie industry.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children should not be made to work because there parents want to benefit from them. by banning child actors we will ban parent's profits over childhood.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It makes children work when they are too young to be able to decide for themselves and they lose the time with school friends and just being a kidKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children should be free to have fun and enjoy life not made to work in hire pressure situations so we should ban the use of child actors.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are treated as adults and miss out on the social and emotional maturity process that children need to become healthy adults.Keypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't ban the use of child actors as it builds skills and teaches them how to listen to instructionsKeypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Acting puts too much pressure on children and they are too young to handle itKeypoint: Child performers have a lot of pressure", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: How are you going to make tv shows and movies without children?Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The role of a child actor cannot be fulfilled by adults to cannot possibly be banned.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children play important roles in many television shows and movies. it would be a great loss not to have them performing.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Kids should be kids and not put to work. especially when some roles can cause emotional trauma and lasting effects when children's understanding of real and fake is often blurred.Keypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Banning child actors would impose serious limitations on the entertainment industry.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Acting can be a very prosperous career, and it would be a shame to take this option away if a child is truly willing to do it.Keypoint: Child performers achieve success/confidence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are carefully monitored and protected by current laws and should not be banned.Keypoint: Child performers should not be banned as long as there is supervision/regulation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors miss out on socialization with kids their own age and fall behind in schoolKeypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Acting takes children away from their education and normal childhood pursuitsKeypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are robbed of their childhood and can face much emotional turmoil as an adult from missing this important step in childhood.Keypoint: Child performers tend to develop problems later in life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors can make a good amount of money for their future doing something they enjoyKeypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: As long as there is proper protection for child actors there is no reason that they should not be able to perform on screenKeypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban the use of child actors because they need to be kids not waste their lifes actingKeypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We must not prohibit the use of child actors because it goes against the right to work. children under the supervision of their parents can develop their artistic talent without affecting their personal growthKeypoint: Child performers should not be banned as long as there is supervision/regulation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The use of child actors shall be banned because fame at a young age rarely results in a normal healthy lifeKeypoint: Child performers tend to develop problems later in life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children in film and tv are regularly exploited and ill-treated by vain and self serving producers who have no ongoing concern for the well being of their young charges and so they should not be usedKeypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children are naive and are often manipulated or not given fair compensationKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Using child actors can create unimaginable pressure ans stress on the child if they become a star or the production is a success and this can lead to substance abuse problems to cope with said pressureKeypoint: Child performers have a lot of pressure", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Using child actors is exploitation, it prevent children from having a childhood, children will not chose this for themselves they are pushed into it by parents wanting their 5 minutes of fame and the money.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without child actors, there will be less movies and tv shows for children to enjoy. talented children may not develop a love for acting if they can never pursue it at an early age.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban the use of child actors because they need to be kids not waste their lifes actingKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a parent sees that their child has the ability to get into the entertainment business at an early age, it should be encouraged. everyone wants a better life and if they can start early, great.Keypoint: Child performers should not be banned as long as there is supervision/regulation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors cannot be banned since a typical family would never be able to be depicted on film or televisionKeypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It's necessary to have children in tv shows and movies and therefore banning them from acting makes no sense.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban the use of child actors because children many times are part of a television or movie script. as long as the child actor has parental guidance, everything is fine.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children should be free to have fun and enjoy life not made to work in hire pressure situations so we should ban the use of child actors.Keypoint: Child performers have a lot of pressure", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are able to access school work on set, and have a protected upbringing. there is no need to ban the use of children in tv and films as there is no harm caused.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The use of child actors should be banned because the work takes them from the education they will most likely need to obtain gainful employment in adult lifeKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Are we going to make movies without children at all? banning child actors does not seem reasonable in this billion dollar industry.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban the use of child actors as many are talented actors who enjoy performing and can use this as a stepping stone to an adult career.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are exploited both by parents and the video industry, children should study and grow without workingKeypoint: Child performers have a lot of pressure", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Who or what would they use instead of a child actor?as long as the child works regular hours and still goes to school what is the problem?Keypoint: The parents should decide for their child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Using child actors is exploitation, it prevent children from having a childhood, children will not chose this for themselves they are pushed into it by parents wanting their 5 minutes of fame and the money.Keypoint: Child performers tend to develop problems later in life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are vital to the entertainment industry.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors will do just fine with proper supervision and regulationKeypoint: Child performers should not be banned as long as there is supervision/regulation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are enough rules and policies in place to protect child actors, making it a safe professionKeypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban the use of child actors because it robs them of their childhood and forces them to grow up too fast.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It makes children work when they are too young to be able to decide for themselves and they lose the time with school friends and just being a kidKeypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children should be allowed to grow up at their own pace, child actors have an abnormal upbringing and are exposed to things at an early age which makes it difficult for them to then lead a normal life.Keypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents often force their children into acting for their own selfish reasonsKeypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If they want to be an actor it is their choiceKeypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a child wishes to act and the mother and father agree they ought to be permitted to act because there are rules to protect them at workKeypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are often forced to grow up too quickly and lose out on a traditional childhood.Keypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are needed to fulfill certain rolesKeypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors lose their childhood by working at such a young age, growing up in a stressful, toxic environment, instead of a loving family.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors can secure a future for college with the earnings they make and can be protected by family and managers to insure their safety in their young acting careers.Keypoint: Child performers achieve success/confidence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children can learn a lot by acting, and they can be good actors under adult supervisionKeypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are treated poorly in the industry.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They are given a wonderful opportunity to provide their own wealth for when they are adults as well as the opportunity to have valuable life experience in acting.Keypoint: Child performers achieve success/confidence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors can easily get exploited and abused.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors miss out on socialization with kids their own age and fall behind in schoolKeypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children should grow up going to school with their peers and playing with neighborhood friends. child actors are taken out of this environment and made to work in an adult environment.Keypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: So few child actors go on to have a stable childhood and normal adulthood having lived in the artificial world of show business.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban the use of child actors as many are talented actors who enjoy performing and can use this as a stepping stone to an adult career.Keypoint: Child performers achieve success/confidence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Use of child actors gives us a lot of great shows we wouldn't have if there were not child actorsKeypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: As long as the child really wants to do it and is being properly supervised, they should be allowed to act.Keypoint: Child performers should not be banned as long as there is supervision/regulation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children shouldn't have to work at all- they should be playing and learning.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children provide unique storytelling opportunities for movies and should not be banned as long as they are properly raised and cared for.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The use of child actors should be banned as children are not capable of making important decisions and some do not have trustworthy parents to make rationale decisions.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors can be overworked and they can miss out on their education. this can lead to difficulties in later life if they don't graduate school with any qualifications.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without child actors there wouldn't be any films that children can relate to. they need to see their own peers in situations they can comprehend.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is too much exploitation of minors in the entertainment industry. with advances in cgi, child actors can and should become a thing of the past.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Using child actors only makes them more susceptible to drug use later on.Keypoint: Child performers tend to develop problems later in life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban the use of child actors as it could cause huge job losses in the entertainment industry.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are subjected to far too much pressure and are unable to live a normal life playing with friends and going to school. this pressure normally leads to health problems in later life.Keypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without child actors, a significant amount of movies and tv series simply couldn't be made and networks would struggle to fill their slotsKeypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If there are problems with kids and acting then just regulate it more and don't ban it completelyKeypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are an important part of the acting industry and should continue to be allowed with restrictions to ensure the child's well being.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The use of child actors helps the children learn a profession or skill that they can use to be a productive part of society.Keypoint: Child performers achieve success/confidence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The use of child actors shold be banned because while they are working they are not getting the education they will most likely need to get on in adult lifeKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children are exploited by their parents and content creators for moneyKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban the use of child actors because the entertainment industry would no longer be able to produce many popular shows resulting in huge joblosses.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban the use of child actors because it takes away their childhood and innocence and forces them to grow up too fast.Keypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We must not prohibit the use of child actors because it goes against the right to work. children under the supervision of their parents can develop their artistic talent without affecting their personal growthKeypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They may miss out on other things like schoolingKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban the use of child actors as this is exploitation of children who, probably, are forced into working rather than choosing to.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors can easily get exploited and abused.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban the use of child actors as many are talented actors who enjoy performing and can use this as a stepping stone to an adult career.Keypoint: Child performers should not be banned as long as there is supervision/regulation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a child wishes to be an actor and they are given time to be a child, then it should be allowed.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors should be banned as they miss out on growing up properly in a stable family environment and get adequate education.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They may miss out on other things like schoolingKeypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are often forced to grow up too fast in a way that stunts their development permanently.Keypoint: Child performers tend to develop problems later in life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: As long as the child really wants to do it and is being properly supervised, they should be allowed to act.Keypoint: Child performers achieve success/confidence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many films and television shows have child roles which could only be filled by children. as long as the children are protected it means that the finished product will have higher artistic integrity.Keypoint: Child performers should not be banned as long as there is supervision/regulation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children should grow up going to school with their peers and playing with neighborhood friends. child actors are taken out of this environment and made to work in an adult environment.Keypoint: Child performers tend to develop problems later in life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This is child labor and child labor is illegal.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children should grow up going to school with their peers and playing with neighborhood friends. child actors are taken out of this environment and made to work in an adult environment.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children are exploited by their parents and content creators for moneyKeypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are robbed of their childhood and can face much emotional turmoil as an adult from missing this important step in childhood.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Acting takes children away from their education and normal childhood pursuitsKeypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are fine to use as long as there is a responsible adult watching them.Keypoint: Child performers should not be banned as long as there is supervision/regulation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Being able to portray children is an important part of today's media. there are already sufficient regulations in place to ensure the safety of the actors, and it gives children a financial head start.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The use of child actors should be banned as children are not capable of making important decisions and some do not have trustworthy parents to make rationale decisions.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: As long as there is proper protection for child actors there is no reason that they should not be able to perform on screenKeypoint: Child performers should not be banned as long as there is supervision/regulation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban the use of child actors because the entertainment industry would no longer be able to produce many popular shows resulting in huge joblosses.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are needed to fulfill certain rolesKeypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors can secure a future for college with the earnings they make and can be protected by family and managers to insure their safety in their young acting careers.Keypoint: The parents should decide for their child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If acting is their passion they should be able to pursue that no matter what their ageKeypoint: Child performers achieve success/confidence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are needed for roles that could not be fulfilled by adults so banning their use would be impossible.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are at risk for abuse mentally and sexually which will destroy their development in lifeKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors have far wider experiences than other children giving them confidence and money that can enhance their adult lives.Keypoint: Child performers achieve success/confidence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Acting exposes children to a variety of people and places, giving them valuable life experience they would not receive otherwise.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are exploited both by parents and the video industry, children should study and grow without workingKeypoint: Child performers tend to develop problems later in life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It's the parents' decision whether a child actsKeypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors can be overworked and they can miss out on their education. this can lead to difficulties in later life if they don't graduate school with any qualifications.Keypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many child actors are put under a huge amount of pressure to perform well and can be denied most of their childhood by unscrupulous adults that only want to profit from their talents.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is a risk of children exploitation by forcing them to act things they wouldn't normally do in lifeKeypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban the use of child actors because then no movies would have children in themKeypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children should be learning and playing, not workingKeypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many children have a love of and a desire to go into acting and should not be prevented from doing so.Keypoint: Child performers achieve success/confidence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children are far too easy to exploit and they sometimes end up being far too precocious at an early age due to fame and all it brings.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Acting is an art and not a job so banning the use of children in acting roles is preventing children from exploring their creative ability in that area and should not be banned.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many films and television shows have child roles which could only be filled by children. as long as the children are protected it means that the finished product will have higher artistic integrity.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If parents agree for their kids to do acting, i can`t see any problem with it.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are often forced to grow up too quickly and lose out on a traditional childhood.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children should be free to have fun and enjoy life not made to work in hire pressure situations so we should ban the use of child actors.Keypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Using child actors only makes them more susceptible to drug use later on.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban the use of child actors because it forces them to grow up too quick and could damage them when they get older.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are put in situation vulnerable to predators, miss opportunities of education as well as being able to form solcial bonds in the everyday world.Keypoint: Child performers tend to develop problems later in life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban the use of child actors as many are talented actors who enjoy performing and can use this as a stepping stone to an adult career.Keypoint: The parents should decide for their child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we don't have child actors then we cannot create movies and dramas that other children can relate to.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban the use of child actors because even from a young age, some people know that acting is a career they legitimately want to pursue. they're not being forced into it.Keypoint: Child performers achieve success/confidence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are robbed of their childhood and can face much emotional turmoil as an adult from missing this important step in childhood.Keypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban the use of child actors since they are well supervised and the industry are regulated to protect them.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Acting is very trying. it places a huge strain on children, and many end up being abused or using drugs to escape the pressure.Keypoint: Child performers tend to develop problems later in life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children should be free to have fun and enjoy life not made to work in hire pressure situations so we should ban the use of child actors.Keypoint: Child performers tend to develop problems later in life", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban the use of child actors as it could cause huge job losses in the entertainment industry.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The usage of child actors should not be banned as they are an important part of the acting field they have adults who can make rationale decisions for them.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are all too often traumatised or abused so their use should be banned.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They dont get the formal education that other children get and they might be too tired to study which might affect them academicallyKeypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't ban the use of child actors. i think this role can be good for children, it opens up career doors, and who would fill all the roles that need a child not an adult..Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many films and television shows have child roles which could only be filled by children. as long as the children are protected it means that the finished product will have higher artistic integrity.Keypoint: Child performers achieve success/confidence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children are humans too and with their consent and their parent's consent, should be allowed to workKeypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors lose the sense of a proper childhood.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are forced to grow up way too fast, they are thrown into a world of drugs and sex at an early age. kids should be away from all that until hollywood is safe for them.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children shouldn't have to work at all- they should be playing and learning.Keypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are not able to make their own decisions and are placed in situations that they do not understand for the financial benefit of others and should be banned.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Placing pressure and fame upon someone so young as been shown to cause mental problems in later life.Keypoint: Child performers have a lot of pressure", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are not able to make their own decisions and are placed in situations that they do not understand for the financial benefit of others and should be banned.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are really doing labor and child labor is against the law.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is too much exploitation of minors in the entertainment industry. with advances in cgi, child actors can and should become a thing of the past.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without child actors there will be no characters for actual children to relate toKeypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors need to be in acting because many movies and shows have child parts in them,Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Who or what would they use instead of a child actor?as long as the child works regular hours and still goes to school what is the problem?Keypoint: Child performers achieve success/confidence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Kids should be kids and not put to work. especially when some roles can cause emotional trauma and lasting effects when children's understanding of real and fake is often blurred.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: For a parent to basically sell their child out as labor for their own purposes is wrong. children should be allowed to grow up in a normal environment.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Acting takes children away from their education and normal childhood pursuitsKeypoint: Child performers have a lot of pressure", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are an important part of the acting industry and should continue to be allowed with restrictions to ensure the child's well being.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Acting may be a dream for a child and we do not want to crush their dreams.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are subjected to far too much pressure and are unable to live a normal life playing with friends and going to school. this pressure normally leads to health problems in later life.Keypoint: Child performers tend to develop problems later in life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We can't ban the usage of child actors because these talented children have the right to perform and earn money. this early acting can lead them to stardom which might not otherwise occur later.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without child actors, there will be less movies and tv shows for children to enjoy. talented children may not develop a love for acting if they can never pursue it at an early age.Keypoint: Child performers achieve success/confidence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many films and television shows have child roles which could only be filled by children. as long as the children are protected it means that the finished product will have higher artistic integrity.Keypoint: The parents should decide for their child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: With the proper support system and watch dogs, we can provide healthy environments for child actors.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are not mature enough to handle the pressures of show business.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban the use of child actors since they are well supervised and the industry are regulated to protect them.Keypoint: Child performers should not be banned as long as there is supervision/regulation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't ban the use of child actors because it lets kids follow their dream of acting early on and can lead to an early retirementKeypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban the use of child actors because it would be awfully strange to watch programs and never see a child as that is not real life.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children should grow up going to school with their peers and playing with neighborhood friends. child actors are taken out of this environment and made to work in an adult environment.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Using child actors is exploitation, it prevent children from having a childhood, children will not chose this for themselves they are pushed into it by parents wanting their 5 minutes of fame and the money.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors do not get to live a proper young persons life and experience childhood play, education and social interaction, so should be bannedKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban the use of child actors because they belong in schoolKeypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Using child actors can create unimaginable pressure ans stress on the child if they become a star or the production is a success and this can lead to substance abuse problems to cope with said pressureKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children should be free to do what they want with their consent and their parents consentKeypoint: Child performers achieve success/confidence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without child actors, a significant amount of movies and tv series simply couldn't be made and networks would struggle to fill their slotsKeypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are often exploited by the film industry and should not be usedKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children are vulnerable to being exploited by greedy entertainment corporation and are not protected from the dangers of the industry so we should ban child actors.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Kids are very important to movies and tv shows. without them it would be dull. they are home schooled and get the education they need and it gives them an early start to fame.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should ban the use of child actors because it robs them of their childhood and forces them to grow up too fast.Keypoint: Child performers are losing their childhood", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If parents agree for their children to acting in movies, can`t see any problem with it.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Who or what would they use instead of a child actor?as long as the child works regular hours and still goes to school what is the problem?Keypoint: Child performers should not be banned as long as there is supervision/regulation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Too much fame at a young age has proven to have ruined many livesKeypoint: Child performers tend to develop problems later in life", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: As long as child actors are protected and monitored, their participation in the acting industry should be allowed.Keypoint: Child performers should not be banned as long as there is supervision/regulation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors need to be in acting because many movies and shows have child parts in them,Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are often forced to grow up too fast in a way that stunts their development permanently.Keypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors get exploited in hollywood and this ban would stop that.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is a risk of children exploitation by forcing them to act things they wouldn't normally do in lifeKeypoint: Being a performer harms the child's education", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are put in situation vulnerable to predators, miss opportunities of education as well as being able to form solcial bonds in the everyday world.Keypoint: Child performers are at risk of exploitation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Acting is very trying. it places a huge strain on children, and many end up being abused or using drugs to escape the pressure.Keypoint: Child performers have a lot of pressure", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Acting at a young age not only gives a child the experience that is needed but it also gives them confidence as well as making money that they can use for later on in lifeKeypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: To tell a story in theater or movies we need children actors. without them stories could only be about adults. stories that have entertained us from lassie to mary poppins would not exist.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children are humans too and with their consent and their parent's consent, should be allowed to workKeypoint: The parents should decide for their child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: As long as it doesn't interfere with their schooling and they are well looked after i don't see a problem.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban the use of child actors because we would not have the shows and movies that are otherwise available.Keypoint: Child performers are necessary for roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are an important part of the acting industry and should continue to be allowed with restrictions to ensure the child's well being.Keypoint: Child performers achieve success/confidence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If there are problems with kids and acting then just regulate it more and don't ban it completelyKeypoint: Child performers should not be banned as long as there is supervision/regulation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Children can learn a lot by acting, and they can be good actors under adult supervisionKeypoint: Child performers should not be banned as long as there is supervision/regulation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors cannot be banned since a typical family would never be able to be depicted on film or televisionKeypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not ban the use of child actors because we would not have the shows and movies that are otherwise available.Keypoint: Acting may be the child's dream", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a child is passionate about acting they should be allowed to pursue that dreamKeypoint: Child performers achieve success/confidence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Child actors are not mature enough to handle the pressures of show business.Keypoint: Child performers have a lot of pressure", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - } - ] -} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/tasks/task1295_kpa_keypoint_matching_guantanamo_bay_detection_camp_topic.json b/tasks/task1295_kpa_keypoint_matching_guantanamo_bay_detection_camp_topic.json deleted file mode 100644 index 9435308e2..000000000 --- a/tasks/task1295_kpa_keypoint_matching_guantanamo_bay_detection_camp_topic.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2500 +0,0 @@ -{ - "Contributors": [ - "Arjun Ashok" - ], - "Source": [ - "ArgKP (https://github.com/IBM/KPA_2021_shared_task)" - ], - "Definition": "The input contains an argument and a keypoint on the topic \"We should close Guantanamo Bay detention camp\", separated by \"\".Your task is to answer if the keypoint matches the argument and summarizes exactly what the argument means, in the context of this topic.", - "Categories": [ - "Classification -> Verification -> Summary Verification", - "Text Comparison" - ], - "Domains": [ - "Reviews", - "Law", - "Government and Politics", - "Dialogue" - ], - "Input_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Output_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Instruction_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Positive Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: It helps protect the usa as the terrorist are not in the usa so certain laws wont apply to these people.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that it helps protect the usa as the terrorist are not in the usa so certain laws wont apply to these people." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prisoners are subjected to practices and conditions that are regarded as inhumaneKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp personnel commit crimes against the prisoners", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that prisoners are subjected to practices and conditions that are regarded as inhumane" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay provides intelligence information that may crack terrorist cells and prevent future attacks.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that guantanamo bay provides intelligence information that may crack terrorist cells and prevent future attacks." - } - ], - "Negative Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Whatever public diplomacy advantage may be achieved by closing the facility would be offset by the damage done to national securityKeypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that whatever public diplomacy advantage may be achieved by closing the facility would be offset by the damage done to national security" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should keep guantanamo bay detection camp open because one of the most guarded prisons and can hold the baddest criminalsKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that we should keep guantanamo bay detection camp open because one of the most guarded prisons and can hold the baddest criminals" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay detection camp offers an essential form of law enforcement and imprisonment for serious criminals and has provided important intelligence in ongoing surveillance.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that guantanamo bay detection camp offers an essential form of law enforcement and imprisonment for serious criminals and has provided important intelligence in ongoing surveillance." - } - ], - "Instances": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo serves an important purpose in securely housing foreign suspected criminals for deportation or trial while keeping us soil secure from retaliation for these people.Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay detection camp should be closed because it's a place of extreme torture.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp personnel commit crimes against the prisoners", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay treats the prisoners barbarically; it must be closed downKeypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Its continued existence beyond the boundaries of the law makes a mockery of american values and weakens our standing in the worldKeypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay detention camp is synonymous with torture and the flagrant abuse of human rights; it must be shut down immediately.Keypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo is expensive, making it a theft from taxpayers for no real benefit.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Detaining terrorists at guantanamo bay keeps them off the battlefield.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay exists to remove dangerous terrorists from the outside world, eliminated their ability to recruit and plan attacks.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay has been useful in extracting information from enemy combatants and should not be closed.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay provides a valuable service in the war on terrorKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay exists to remove dangerous terrorists from the outside world, eliminated their ability to recruit and plan attacks.Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Usa must have a detention center for criminals who attempt against national security and must be outside our territoryKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By violating the human rights of detainees at guantanamo bay, the u.s. loses its authority to request from other countries to stop their human rights violations.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is expensive", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should close guantanamo bay since the treatment of these inmates is likely inhumane and some are there with no real proof they belong there, but will never even get a trial.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp personnel commit crimes against the prisoners", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Keeping terrorist and criminal contained allows the government to collect information and prevent terrorist attacks.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay maintains terrorists that are a threat to the united states and keep foreign prisoners so as they are not returned to their countries to commit continued acts of terrorism.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: No one should be kept in the detection camp without the verdict of judge and proof of their guiltKeypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It does not hold many people & is not worth the money spent to keep it openKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is a place of victimization of human rights, unfair detention to some innocent prisoners that have been unfairly and unjustly racially profiled.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo can provide security for accused terrorists who would be hurt in the general prison population.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should close it, it costs tax payers too much in taxesKeypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prisoners are subjected to practices and conditions that are regarded as inhumaneKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay has a reputation that the usa needs to get away from and so needs to close itKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It houses some very dangerous criminals who should not be allowed into the countryKeypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is far better to house dangerous terrorists outside the united states and guantanamo bay is the perfect place to do that so we must keep it open.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It keeps all the dangerous criminals away from the societyKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The inhumane activities in guantanamo bay detention camp must come to an end.Keypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should close guantanamo bay detection camp because it is very expensive to runKeypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should close guantanamo bay detection camp as it is a known center of severe restrictive punishment and should not be allowed to continue in a civilized society.Keypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It keeps all the dangerous criminals away from the societyKeypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay provides a valuable service in the war on terrorKeypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay's treatment of prisoners violates the geneva conventionKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp personnel commit crimes against the prisoners", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should close it, it is inhumane the way the prisoners are treated thereKeypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay undemocratically burdens us citizens in terms of both liberties and financesKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is an important tool for the war on terror and it shows the lengths we are willing to go to fight the enemyKeypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is tool to break down individuals accused or suspected of terrorism to avert other acts of terrorism, so should be kept open in the fight against terrorism.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay uses torture on it's prisoners which is cruel and inhumane.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is far better to house dangerous terrorists outside the united states and guantanamo bay is the perfect place to do that so we must keep it open.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The practices used at guantanamo bay are inhumane. no person deserved to be tortured and abused. not only that the tax payers are footing the bill. instead of keeping prisoners contained we must exterminate.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It's a great place to keep terrorist suspects away from the general population keeping us all safer while they are under investigation.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't close guantanamo bay detection camp for peace of worldKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is inhumane and there is no oversight over how it is run.Keypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is a stain on america's reputation as a lawful and just country.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It's a great place to keep terrorist suspects away from the general population keeping us all safer while they are under investigation.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is an important part of our military arsenal and cannot be removed. it stands as a testament that we are strongerKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guatanamo bay uses torture on its prisoners and should be closed.Keypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo has been a place for torture and needs to be shut down.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Closing guantanamo bay could result in detainees being sent to supermax prisons where their conditions would be worse.Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay serves no purpose aside from committing atrocious human rights violations in the name of protection. half the prisoners aren't even proven to be guilty. it's an embarrassment to democracy.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is expensive", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need guantanamo bay so we have a place to keep terrorists locked up and away from mainland usaKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It needs to remain so that the public is protectedKeypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is a place where terrorists can be held away from the general prison population where they would be vulnerable or in a position to spread their ideologyKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not close guantanamo bay detention camp as we desperately need a facility to hold the worst of the worst criminals.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay helps to find out vital information about terrorists and their planned attacks. this should be done by any means necessary.Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many prisoners have been tortured there and this goes against the human rights act and should be stopped.Keypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Detaining terrorists at guantanamo bay ensures they cannot plan future attacks on america.Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The prisoners at guantanamo bay are dangerous and if let go will only try to hurt us againKeypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are criminals being held in there that shouldn't be let out.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo has destroyed the reputation of the usa as leader of the \"free world. \" whatever little we gain from it just isn't worth it.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay shouldnt be closed as it is detaining terrorists that many countries wont acceptKeypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The existence of guantanamo bay ensures global security.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is a gross violation of international humans rights law and has no place in a civilized country's jurisprudence process.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is a symbol of discrimination/injustice", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should close guantanamo bay since the treatment of these inmates is likely inhumane and some are there with no real proof they belong there, but will never even get a trial.Keypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't ban it because there may be no other way to get information out of individuals which are a threat to the world.Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay detention camp uses questionable tactics to get information from prisoners.Keypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay provides a way of finding out information about terrorist cells and so could potentially save american lives.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay detection camp shouldn't be closed because it helps with national protectionKeypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Those who agree in the need to use guantanamo bay believe that it offers national protection against those people who are seen as a terrorist riskKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not close guantanamo bay detection camp because some of the prisoners are very evil people and will do harm to othersKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not close guantanamo bay detention camp is because you cannot bring the prisoners of war into the country where they can can escape and cause more chaosKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to quit spending money on guantanamo bay detention camp as it is a very expensive prison to tax payers.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There have been abuses of prisoners in this camp. even enemies should not be treated this way.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay detention camp needs to remain open for the safety of our country.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay allows the extraction of information from terrorists, information that is vital to our national securityKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prisoners have not had a trial and have been victims of human rights violations during their detention.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Everything about guantanamo bay violates fundamental, international human rights. people are held without trial, tortured and mistreatedKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp personnel commit crimes against the prisoners", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is an important tool for the war on terror and it shows the lengths we are willing to go to fight the enemyKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay detention camp needs to remain open for the safety of our country.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should close guantanamo bay detention camp because it is cost the tax payers a lot of money to keep it running.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The guantanomo bay camp should be closed as people are kept there without fair trialsKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The camp at guantanamo bay should be closed because it is an extra judicial locality that can hold people indefinitely without due process and without regard to human rights.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is necessary to maintain guantanamo if we want to succeed in the war against terrorismKeypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Closing guantanamo would embolden terrorists who would feel like it is a concession.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not close guantanamo bay detection camp because there are a lot of bad men there and they do not need to be let into the public populationKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not close guantanamo bay because it is a foothold in cuba. it serves as a place for certain criminals who do not belong in regular jails or prisons.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is illegal to detain prisoners indefinitely without bringing them to trial.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It only exists to torture and indefinitely detain people without trialKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is expensive", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is used to house the worst terrorists; if we close it, they might be kept in a less secure location.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay should be closed, it is barbaric in it's treatment of prisoners and only costs us tax payers more.Keypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay's history of torture and other constitutional violations is antithetical to american values.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay shouldnt be closed as it is detaining terrorists that many countries wont acceptKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is not right to hold people indefinitely without a trial and due processKeypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is an inhumane camp that is well hidden from international view and likely to not ensure a fair trial is had.Keypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Detaining terrorists at guantanamo bay keeps them off the battlefield.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Due to the history of abuses at this base it should be closedKeypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not close guantanamo bay detection camp because we need a place to punish dangerous peopleKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should close it, it costs tax payers too much in taxesKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo can provide security for accused terrorists who would be hurt in the general prison population.Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay detention camp is synonymous with torture and the flagrant abuse of human rights; it must be shut down immediately.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp personnel commit crimes against the prisoners", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay detention camp should be closed because it is a stain on the reputation of the usaKeypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is needed to house terrorists in order to make the world a safer place.Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is being used to torture and maim individuals without any real purpose.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prisoners have not had a trial and have been victims of human rights violations during their detention.Keypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay houses terriorists that can not be movedKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay detention camp should be closed because it is a stain on the reputation of the usaKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There have been abuses of prisoners in this camp. even enemies should not be treated this way.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It houses some of the most dangerous people and those people should be as far from society as possible.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay uses torture on it's prisoners which is cruel and inhumane.Keypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to be able to isolate terrorists to keep our country safe and guantanamo bay serves this purposeKeypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It enable the us to interrogate suspects without them endangering the us mainland.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It's a great place to keep terrorist suspects away from the general population keeping us all safer while they are under investigation.Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This camp is too expensive to maintain, especially with such few prisoners.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There have been abuses of prisoners in this camp. even enemies should not be treated this way.Keypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay should not be closed because it is able to successfully house dangerous criminals.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay detention camp uses questionable tactics to get information from prisoners.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It only exists to torture and indefinitely detain people without trialKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp personnel commit crimes against the prisoners", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prisoners have not had a trial and have been victims of human rights violations during their detention.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is a symbol of discrimination/injustice", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to quit spending money on guantanamo bay detention camp as it is a very expensive prison to tax payers.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We got a lot of intelligence information from the detainees there that already helped us in the war on terrorism, so we should keep the camp.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The detainees are treated unjustly, and their conditions are inhumane.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should close guantanamo bay detention camp because it is cost the tax payers a lot of money to keep it running.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is an important part of our military arsenal and cannot be removed. it stands as a testament that we are strongerKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It only exists to torture and indefinitely detain people without trialKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should close guantanamo bay detection camp as it is a known center of severe restrictive punishment and should not be allowed to continue in a civilized society.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is unnecessary to spend so much money on maintaining the installations of guantanamoKeypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guatanamo bay uses torture on its prisoners and should be closed.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The site represents an option to isolate dangerous criminals from outside the usKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo uses torture, which is against international law.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp personnel commit crimes against the prisoners", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: For safety reason we need to keep the camp open.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay detention camp is a large waste of tax payer money, especially since there are facilities within the country that can serve the same purposeKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should close guantanamo bay detection camp because it is very expensive to runKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo harms america's image abroad, making diplomacy more difficult.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Everything about guantanamo bay violates fundamental, international human rights. people are held without trial, tortured and mistreatedKeypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: In no detention center should it be the case that detainees are held indefinitely without a trial, this contravenes all legal rights to a fair trial, innocent until proven guilty and due processKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not close guantanamo bay because it is a foothold in cuba. it serves as a place for certain criminals who do not belong in regular jails or prisons.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The detention camp is a stain on the honor of the usa.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay maintains terrorists that are a threat to the united states and keep foreign prisoners so as they are not returned to their countries to commit continued acts of terrorism.Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This camp is too expensive to maintain, especially with such few prisoners.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay undemocratically burdens us citizens in terms of both liberties and financesKeypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay serves no purpose aside from committing atrocious human rights violations in the name of protection. half the prisoners aren't even proven to be guilty. it's an embarrassment to democracy.Keypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay still houses criminals and keeps them from again hurting the publicKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay provides a safe place to house those people who pose a real threat to national security.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay runs on a decree that allows it to hold prisoners without trial. this violates a basic fundamental right and almost certainly means there are prisoners held that are innocentKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It`s been proved that some of guantanamo bay people has been identified as terrorist and knowing that guantanamo bay should still be in operation.Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay houses many terrorists who would not be able to survive in any other prison settingKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The camp at guantanamo bay should be closed because it is an extra judicial locality that can hold people indefinitely without due process and without regard to human rights.Keypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is a gross violation of international humans rights law and has no place in a civilized country's jurisprudence process.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay detection camp has inhuman conditions.Keypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is a place of cruelty and is very inhumane.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp personnel commit crimes against the prisoners", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should close guantanamo bay detection camp because some of the people are treated badlyKeypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to keep guantanamo bay detention camp open as we need a place to keep the worst of the worst criminals and not place them in other countries where they could cause harm to others.Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is the best place to detain the people there. they are far too dangerous to be moved stateside.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Where there's toleration of imprisonment without due process there's a risk of losing the entire democracy.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Whatever public diplomacy advantage may be achieved by closing the facility would be offset by the damage done to national securityKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Detaining terrorists at guantanamo bay ensures they cannot plan future attacks on america.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay detention camp is synonymous with torture and the flagrant abuse of human rights; it must be shut down immediately.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We have obtained valuable information from these prisoners. this information protects our citizensKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay provides a way of finding out information about terrorist cells and so could potentially save american lives.Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is hardly used since 9/11 and is costing the government money.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need guantanamo bay so we have a place to keep terrorists locked up and away from mainland usaKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should close guantanamo bay detection camp because it has been reported that many prisoners have been tortured.Keypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is unnecessary to spend so much money on maintaining the installations of guantanamoKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should close guantanamo bay because it's unfair to continue to hold human beings in prison without giving them a fair trialKeypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The existence of guantanamo bay ensures global security.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many prisoners have been tortured there and this goes against the human rights act and should be stopped.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay's treatment of prisoners violates the geneva conventionKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay detection camp is an embarrassment to the usKeypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay detention camps are a heavy drain on government funds and should be closed. if needed, other military prisons can be used.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is used to house terrorists; if we close it, they might be released to some place where it would be easier for them to escape.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo has destroyed the reputation of the usa as leader of the \"free world. \" whatever little we gain from it just isn't worth it.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay uses torture on it's prisoners which is cruel and inhumane.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp personnel commit crimes against the prisoners", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Quantanamo bay should be closed because it violates human rightsKeypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We got a lot of intelligence information from the detainees there that already helped us in the war on terrorism, so we should keep the camp.Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay helps to find out vital information about terrorists and their planned attacks. this should be done by any means necessary.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is a place of cruelty and is very inhumane.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The practices used at guantanamo bay are inhumane. no person deserved to be tortured and abused. not only that the tax payers are footing the bill. instead of keeping prisoners contained we must exterminate.Keypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay maintains terrorists that are a threat to the united states and keep foreign prisoners so as they are not returned to their countries to commit continued acts of terrorism.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Circumventing the law by building detention camps off of us soil makes a mockery of the very institutions america is trying to protect.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is needed to house terrorists in order to make the world a safer place.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo serves an important purpose in securely housing foreign suspected criminals for deportation or trial while keeping us soil secure from retaliation for these people.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay detention camp is synonymous with torture and the flagrant abuse of human rights; it must be shut down immediately.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is an infringement on human rightsKeypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is being used to torture and maim individuals without any real purpose.Keypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay housing the most dangerous criminals to our country and the idea of it also aids in preventing some from embarking on terrorist tactics for fear of imprisonment in the facility.Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is somewhere safe to house suspected terrorists therefore it is necessary.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not close guantanamo bay detection camp because there are a lot of bad men there and they do not need to be let into the public populationKeypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay violates many international treaties on the treatment of prisoners.Keypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The guantanamo bay camp is necessary for national securityKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The guantanamo bay camp is necessary for national securityKeypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should close guantanamo bay detection camp because it has been reported that many prisoners have been tortured.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prisoners have not had a trial and have been victims of human rights violations during their detention.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay detection camp shouldn't be closed because it helps with national protectionKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Everything about guantanamo bay violates fundamental, international human rights. people are held without trial, tortured and mistreatedKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay houses many terrorists who would not be able to survive in any other prison settingKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay houses the most dangerous threats to america and americans, including terrorists that can offer valuable insight to aid in preventing terror attacks.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By violating the human rights of detainees at guantanamo bay, the u.s. loses its authority to request from other countries to stop their human rights violations.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need guantanamo bay so we have a place to keep terrorists locked up and away from mainland usaKeypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It enable the us to interrogate suspects without them endangering the us mainland.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay detection camp needs to be closed as this this prison is costing the united states millions of dollars for a prison that is no longer needed.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not close guantanamo bay detection camp because there are a lot of bad men there and they do not need to be let into the public populationKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The detainees are treated unjustly, and their conditions are inhumane.Keypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many prisoners have been tortured there and this goes against the human rights act and should be stopped.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp personnel commit crimes against the prisoners", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't close guantanamo bay detection camp for national securityKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should close guantanamo bay because it has been nothing but a source of suspicion and accusations of prisoner abuse tainting the reputation of the us.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is expensive", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: To keep america and it's allies safe and to rid the world of terrorists we need to keep guantanamo bay open. these are enemies and dangerous people. we need to get them to talk and give us intel we need.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't ban it because there may be no other way to get information out of individuals which are a threat to the world.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There have been abuses of prisoners in this camp. even enemies should not be treated this way.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp personnel commit crimes against the prisoners", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo is a torture center and must be closedKeypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Closing gitmo will only lead to more terrorists running free and thus jeopardizing our safety.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should close guantanamo bay detection camp because some of the people are treated badlyKeypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Closing guantanamo bay could result in detainees being sent to supermax prisons where their conditions would be worse.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay's history of torture and other constitutional violations is antithetical to american values.Keypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It has provided useful information to help find terrorists and stop terror attacks.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is a secure location to imprison potential terrorists, who are a threat to us national security.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Where there's toleration of imprisonment without due process there's a risk of losing the entire democracy.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not close guantanamo bay detection camp because some of the prisoners are very evil people and will do harm to othersKeypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay detention camps are a heavy drain on government funds and should be closed. if needed, other military prisons can be used.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo can provide security for accused terrorists who would be hurt in the general prison population.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prisoners held here are often tortured illegally.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay's treatment of prisoners violates the geneva conventionKeypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to be able to isolate terrorists to keep our country safe and guantanamo bay serves this purposeKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not close guantanamo bay as it is one of a small number of highly secure detention camps in which intelligence against future threats can be gathered and which may help to act as a deterrent.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo harms america's image abroad, making diplomacy more difficult.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is a stain on the reputation of the usa that has acted to further the cause of terrorists around the worldKeypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The guantanomo bay camp should be closed as people are kept there without fair trialsKeypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is an infringement on human rightsKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp personnel commit crimes against the prisoners", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prisoners are subjected to practices and conditions that are regarded as inhumaneKeypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay houses some of the most dangerous criminals in the world. where would these people go if it was closed? who would take them? no one. they'd be back in the world allowed to kill again.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay violates many international treaties on the treatment of prisoners.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay detection camp stops terrorismKeypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should close guantanamo bay since the treatment of these inmates is likely inhumane and some are there with no real proof they belong there, but will never even get a trial.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is expensive", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo is far more secure than most prisons, preventing the worst criminals from escaping.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not close guantanamo bay detection camp because some of the prisoners are very evil people and will do harm to othersKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: In no detention center should it be the case that detainees are held indefinitely without a trial, this contravenes all legal rights to a fair trial, innocent until proven guilty and due processKeypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The horrific conditions and treatment are inhumane, and despite what someone has done they deserve a basic quality of life.Keypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The detention camp is a stain on the honor of the usa.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The inmates of guantanamo bay are terrorists and a danger to the person on the street, closing guantanamo bay would put thousands of innocent people at risk.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should close gauntanamo bay detention camp because it is a costly way of holding just a few inmates.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The guantanamo bay detention camp keeps those prisoners out of circulation and away from the american public making it safer for our country.Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It has provided useful information to help find terrorists and stop terror attacks.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay's treatment of prisoners violates the geneva conventionKeypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Detaining terrorists at guantanamo bay keeps them off the battlefield.Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay has been useful in extracting information from enemy combatants and should not be closed.Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is a place where the most dangerous terrorists can be isolated and interrogated securelyKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The guantanamo bay camp is necessary for national securityKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is the best option for housing terrorists.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The usa should be above holding political prisoners.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay houses some of the worlds most dangerous terrorists and in order to keep people safe it must stay open.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It needs to remain so that the public is protectedKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo uses torture, which is against international law.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The use of guantanamo bay makes the united states look bad and we should close it down.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The guantanamo bay detention camp treats its prisoners inhumanely; therefore it should be closed.Keypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay housing the most dangerous criminals to our country and the idea of it also aids in preventing some from embarking on terrorist tactics for fear of imprisonment in the facility.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is not right to hold people indefinitely without a trial and due processKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It does not hold many people & is not worth the money spent to keep it openKeypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay detention camp is a large waste of tax payer money, especially since there are facilities within the country that can serve the same purposeKeypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It`s been proved that some of guantanamo bay people has been identified as terrorist and knowing that guantanamo bay should still be in operation.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay still houses criminals and keeps them from again hurting the publicKeypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay houses some of the worlds most dangerous terrorists and in order to keep people safe it must stay open.Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The camp should remain open and it keep society safeKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guatanamo bay uses torture on its prisoners and should be closed.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp personnel commit crimes against the prisoners", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should close guantanamo bay since the treatment of these inmates is likely inhumane and some are there with no real proof they belong there, but will never even get a trial.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Closing gitmo will only lead to more terrorists running free and thus jeopardizing our safety.Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Keeping terrorist and criminal contained allows the government to collect information and prevent terrorist attacks.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It houses some very dangerous criminals who should not be allowed into the countryKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't close guatanamo bay detection camp because there is no where else to keep these terrorists. it seems to be working fine so why make a change?Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay violates many international treaties on the treatment of prisoners.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is expensive", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay helps to find out vital information about terrorists and their planned attacks. this should be done by any means necessary.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is a place of victimization of human rights, unfair detention to some innocent prisoners that have been unfairly and unjustly racially profiled.Keypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is simply a place for the united states to torture prisoners without having to answer to the law.Keypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It keeps all the dangerous criminals away from the societyKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay shouldnt be closed as it is detaining terrorists that many countries wont acceptKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Whatever public diplomacy advantage may be achieved by closing the facility would be offset by the damage done to national securityKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need guantanamo bay to stay open in order to detain and interrogate enemy combatants in support of our war efforts.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay houses some of the worlds most dangerous terrorists and in order to keep people safe it must stay open.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is hardly used since 9/11 and is costing the government money.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It helps protect the usa as the terrorist are not in the usa so certain laws wont apply to these people.Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is a stain on america's reputation as a lawful and just country.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Due to the history of abuses at this base it should be closedKeypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prisoners held here are often tortured illegally.Keypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is necessary to maintain guantanamo if we want to succeed in the war against terrorismKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay detection camp stops terrorismKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Quantanamo bay should be closed because it violates human rightsKeypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The prisoners at guantanamo bay are dangerous and if let go will only try to hurt us againKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't ban it because there may be no other way to get information out of individuals which are a threat to the world.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is an important part of our military arsenal and cannot be removed. it stands as a testament that we are strongerKeypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay uses torture on it's prisoners which is cruel and inhumane.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't close guantanamo bay detection camp for peace of worldKeypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prisoners are tortured beyond reasons there and it's a human right's violationKeypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay detection camp offers an essential form of law enforcement and imprisonment for serious criminals and has provided important intelligence in ongoing surveillance.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay detection camp shouldn't be closed because it helps with national protectionKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The torture in guantanamo bay are inhumane and awful. these people should be facing a judge and jury for their crimes. if you want info out of them give them less prison time. torture is not the answer.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prisoners are subjected to practices and conditions that are regarded as inhumaneKeypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay detection camp has inhuman conditions.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prisoners held here are often tortured illegally.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The inmates of guantanamo bay are terrorists and a danger to the person on the street, closing guantanamo bay would put thousands of innocent people at risk.Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The torture in guantanamo bay are inhumane and awful. these people should be facing a judge and jury for their crimes. if you want info out of them give them less prison time. torture is not the answer.Keypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: For safety reason we need to keep the camp open.Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay detection camp should be closed because it's a place of extreme torture.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Detaining terrorists at guantanamo bay ensures they cannot plan future attacks on america.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prisoners are being tortured and held without being given a fair trial, which is inhumane.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay allows the extraction of information from terrorists, information that is vital to our national securityKeypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay houses some of the most dangerous criminals in the world. where would these people go if it was closed? who would take them? no one. they'd be back in the world allowed to kill again.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prisoners held here are often tortured illegally.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp personnel commit crimes against the prisoners", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is a place of cruelty and is very inhumane.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay detection camp is an embarrassment to the usKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is the site where many war crimes occurred such as torture and indefinite mention, many people were let go because of lack of evidence and it is a stain on our history.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not close guantanamo bay because it is a foothold in cuba. it serves as a place for certain criminals who do not belong in regular jails or prisons.Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It needs to remain so that the public is protectedKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to keep guantanamo bay detention camp open as we need a place to keep the worst of the worst criminals and not place them in other countries where they could cause harm to others.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Closing guantanamo bay could result in detainees being sent to supermax prisons where their conditions would be worse.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is the best option for housing terrorists.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We have obtained valuable information from these prisoners. this information protects our citizensKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is illegal to detain prisoners indefinitely without bringing them to trial.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is a secure location to imprison potential terrorists, who are a threat to us national security.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Circumventing the law by building detention camps off of us soil makes a mockery of the very institutions america is trying to protect.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Its continued existence beyond the boundaries of the law makes a mockery of american values and weakens our standing in the worldKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: To keep america and it's allies safe and to rid the world of terrorists we need to keep guantanamo bay open. these are enemies and dangerous people. we need to get them to talk and give us intel we need.Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay runs on a decree that allows it to hold prisoners without trial. this violates a basic fundamental right and almost certainly means there are prisoners held that are innocentKeypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay detection camp stops terrorismKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We got a lot of intelligence information from the detainees there that already helped us in the war on terrorism, so we should keep the camp.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It helps protect the usa as the terrorist are not in the usa so certain laws wont apply to these people.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo is a torture center and must be closedKeypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay houses the most dangerous threats to america and americans, including terrorists that can offer valuable insight to aid in preventing terror attacks.Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prisoners have not had a trial and have been victims of human rights violations during their detention.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is expensive", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't close guantanamo bay detection camp for national securityKeypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay provides intelligence information that may crack terrorist cells and prevent future attacks.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is a symbol of muslim discrimination.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay detection camp needs to be closed as this this prison is costing the united states millions of dollars for a prison that is no longer needed.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't close guantanamo bay detection camp for national securityKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The camp should remain open and it keep society safeKeypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay provides a safe place to house those people who pose a real threat to national security.Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need guantanamo bay to stay open in order to detain and interrogate enemy combatants in support of our war efforts.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The camp should remain open and it keep society safeKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The prisoners at guantanamo bay are dangerous and if let go will only try to hurt us againKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay provides a valuable service in the war on terrorKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The existence of guantanamo bay ensures global security.Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Those who agree in the need to use guantanamo bay believe that it offers national protection against those people who are seen as a terrorist riskKeypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is a symbol of muslim discrimination.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is a symbol of discrimination/injustice", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The guantanamo bay detention camp treats its prisoners inhumanely; therefore it should be closed.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo has been a place for torture and needs to be shut down.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp personnel commit crimes against the prisoners", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is an inhumane camp that is well hidden from international view and likely to not ensure a fair trial is had.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Usa must have a detention center for criminals who attempt against national security and must be outside our territoryKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The guantanamo bay detention camp keeps those prisoners out of circulation and away from the american public making it safer for our country.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It houses some of the most dangerous people and those people should be as far from society as possible.Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We have obtained valuable information from these prisoners. this information protects our citizensKeypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is the site where many war crimes occurred such as torture and indefinite mention, many people were let go because of lack of evidence and it is a stain on our history.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp personnel commit crimes against the prisoners", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need guantanamo bay to stay open in order to detain and interrogate enemy combatants in support of our war efforts.Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should close it, it is inhumane the way the prisoners are treated thereKeypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is tool to break down individuals accused or suspected of terrorism to avert other acts of terrorism, so should be kept open in the fight against terrorism.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay has a reputation that the usa needs to get away from and so needs to close itKeypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Those who agree in the need to use guantanamo bay believe that it offers national protection against those people who are seen as a terrorist riskKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is simply a place for the united states to torture prisoners without having to answer to the law.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many prisoners have been tortured there and this goes against the human rights act and should be stopped.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is expensive", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It`s been proved that some of guantanamo bay people has been identified as terrorist and knowing that guantanamo bay should still be in operation.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is used to house terrorists; if we close it, they might be released to some place where it would be easier for them to escape.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should close guantanamo bay because it's unfair to continue to hold human beings in prison without giving them a fair trialKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: These people, who was captured overseas for terrorism they done, should be treated like the terrorists and kept in the special place like guantanamo bay detection campKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay allows the extraction of information from terrorists, information that is vital to our national securityKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay's history of torture and other constitutional violations is antithetical to american values.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is expensive", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Usa must have a detention center for criminals who attempt against national security and must be outside our territoryKeypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: No one should be kept in the detection camp without the verdict of judge and proof of their guiltKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It houses some very dangerous criminals who should not be allowed into the countryKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The use of guantanamo bay makes the united states look bad and we should close it down.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prisoners are being tortured and held without being given a fair trial, which is inhumane.Keypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The horrific conditions and treatment are inhumane, and despite what someone has done they deserve a basic quality of life.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay provides a way of finding out information about terrorist cells and so could potentially save american lives.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many prisoners have been tortured there and this goes against the human rights act and should be stopped.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By violating the human rights of detainees at guantanamo bay, the u.s. loses its authority to request from other countries to stop their human rights violations.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay housing the most dangerous criminals to our country and the idea of it also aids in preventing some from embarking on terrorist tactics for fear of imprisonment in the facility.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is a stain on the reputation of the usa that has acted to further the cause of terrorists around the worldKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't close guantanamo bay detection camp for peace of worldKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prisoners are tortured beyond reasons there and it's a human right's violationKeypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay has a bad reputation so close it and move the prisoners to another locationKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo is expensive, making it a theft from taxpayers for no real benefit.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The usa should be above holding political prisoners.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay provides a safe place to house those people who pose a real threat to national security.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't close guatanamo bay detection camp because there is no where else to keep these terrorists. it seems to be working fine so why make a change?Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay has been useful in extracting information from enemy combatants and should not be closed.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Closing gitmo will only lead to more terrorists running free and thus jeopardizing our safety.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should close guantanamo bay detection camp because it is costly for taxpayers to keep it open with only a small amount of criminals being held thereKeypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't close guatanamo bay detection camp because there is no where else to keep these terrorists. it seems to be working fine so why make a change?Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Everything about guantanamo bay violates fundamental, international human rights. people are held without trial, tortured and mistreatedKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is expensive", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are criminals being held in there that shouldn't be let out.Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay detection camp is nothing but a place of extreme torture.Keypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay treats the prisoners barbarically; it must be closed downKeypoint: Unjust treatment/tactics are used in the guantanamo bay detention camp", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is necessary to keep terrorists in a place where they are able to be questioned and are in a secure locationKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should close gauntanamo bay detention camp because it is a costly way of holding just a few inmates.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is inhumane and there is no oversight over how it is run.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay should not be closed because it is able to successfully house dangerous criminals.Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay detention camp needs to remain open for the safety of our country.Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay should be closed, it is barbaric in it's treatment of prisoners and only costs us tax payers more.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guatanamo bay uses torture on its prisoners and should be closed.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp harms the us image/reputation/institutions", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay is a secure location to imprison potential terrorists, who are a threat to us national security.Keypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: For safety reason we need to keep the camp open.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The inhumane activities in guantanamo bay detention camp must come to an end.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The inmates of guantanamo bay are terrorists and a danger to the person on the street, closing guantanamo bay would put thousands of innocent people at risk.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should close guantanamo bay detection camp because it is costly for taxpayers to keep it open with only a small amount of criminals being held thereKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to keep it open , where else will these people that are there go?Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay has a bad reputation so close it and move the prisoners to another locationKeypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is a place of cruelty and is very inhumane.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is a symbol of discrimination/injustice", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is necessary to keep terrorists in a place where they are able to be questioned and are in a secure locationKeypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternatives", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay detection camp is nothing but a place of extreme torture.Keypoint: Detainees have the right to trial in us courts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Guantanamo bay houses many terrorists who would not be able to survive in any other prison settingKeypoint: Closing the guantanamo bay detention camp would harm national security", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is a place of cruelty and is very inhumane.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is expensive", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not close guantanamo bay as it is one of a small number of highly secure detention camps in which intelligence against future threats can be gathered and which may help to act as a deterrent.Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is essential to gain intelligence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - } - ] -} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/tasks/task1296_kpa_keypoint_matching_mandatory_retirement_topic.json b/tasks/task1296_kpa_keypoint_matching_mandatory_retirement_topic.json deleted file mode 100644 index a22cb5063..000000000 --- a/tasks/task1296_kpa_keypoint_matching_mandatory_retirement_topic.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2026 +0,0 @@ -{ - "Contributors": [ - "Arjun Ashok" - ], - "Source": [ - "ArgKP (https://github.com/IBM/KPA_2021_shared_task)" - ], - "Definition": "The input contains an argument and a keypoint on the topic \"We should end mandatory retirement\", separated by \"\".Your task is to answer if the keypoint matches the argument and summarizes exactly what the argument means, in the context of this topic.", - "Categories": [ - "Classification -> Verification -> Summary Verification", - "Text Comparison" - ], - "Domains": [ - "Reviews", - "Law", - "Government and Politics", - "Dialogue" - ], - "Input_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Output_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Instruction_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Positive Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: We should end mandatory retirement as it is ageist and outdated and people should be given the opportunity to work for as long as they feel able.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that we should end mandatory retirement as it is ageist and outdated and people should be given the opportunity to work for as long as they feel able." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It forces more qualified people out of jobs & replaces them with less qualified peopleKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that it forces more qualified people out of jobs & replaces them with less qualified people" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement transitions older people into the next stage of their lives.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that mandatory retirement transitions older people into the next stage of their lives." - } - ], - "Negative Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement is a form of age discrimination.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that mandatory retirement is a form of age discrimination." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should end mandatory retirement because some people need to keep working in order to be able to afford to retire.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement reduces the quality of life for those forced to retire", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that we should end mandatory retirement because some people need to keep working in order to be able to afford to retire." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement puts pressure on the government to maintain social services for older people such as social security and pension programs that benefit society as a whole.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that mandatory retirement puts pressure on the government to maintain social services for older people such as social security and pension programs that benefit society as a whole." - } - ], - "Instances": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement allows there to be enough jobs for the next generation, which is more important since these are people who don't have family to rely on and are only starting to build their lives.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without mandatory retirement people can be free to work for extremely long times. this reduces the pool of jobs for younger workers.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement is age discrimination and shouldn't be allowed to happen.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement is not fair/discriminatory", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should end mandatory retirement because it is unfair to discriminate against people on the basis of their age when other forms of discrimination are illegalKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People entering the workforce are having trouble finding jobs. they cannot pay their bills and move up in life if not employed. unless older workers leave work, those trying to start work life cannot.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Everyone should have the choice when to retire.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Certain professions, such as police officer and air traffic controller, have mandatory retirement ages to ensure that the person who is responsible for the safety of others remains competent to do his jobKeypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not end mandatory retirement because the world is already over-populated and people need to retire so that others can back-fill their jobs.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This gives young people a chance to workKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory requirement would inject a new energy and innovation into any given field, and would combat unemployment among young peopleKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement is age-based discrimination. it is discriminatory to assume that everyone who reaches the age of 65 or 70 is incompetent.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement is not fair/discriminatory", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should end mandatory retirement because it discriminates against people due to their age, which is beyond their control.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement is not fair/discriminatory", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement allows there to be enough jobs for the next generation, which is more important since these are people who don't have family to rely on and are only starting to build their lives.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some people are capable of working way beyond the retirement age and should be able to work and increase their retirement funds as long as they ant.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If someone can still work they should be allowed. it will cause less strain on social security.Keypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without mandatory retirement people can be free to work for extremely long times. this reduces the pool of jobs for younger workers.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement should continue because it keeps the workforce freshKeypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement should stop because older people should not be pushed out.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement is not fair/discriminatory", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement allow new workers a chanceKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By having mandatory retirement we are opening job positions for the younger people who need to being their workforce life. they bring new ideas to the workforce that will benefit society.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be able to work as long as they want to.Keypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be able to continue working if they chooseKeypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People shouldn't be forced to retire at a certain age because people all have different abilities at the same age and some can definitely still work.Keypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is beneficial for companies to bring in fresh faces and ideas so that the company does not get stagnatKeypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some people are capable of working way beyond the retirement age and should be able to work and increase their retirement funds as long as they ant.Keypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should end mandatory retirement because elderly people often need their income from work to live.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should have to retire at a certain age so jobs become available for younger people.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not end mandatory retirement because current workers benefited from the policy and should have to 'pay it forward' to younger people.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement put high-skilled workers out of jobs. putting a pressure in the working field and jeopardizing economic progressKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age harms the economy", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement is unfair to those who will still need the income to survive after a certain age.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement reduces the quality of life for those forced to retire", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement helps younger generations by opening up more positions in the workforceKeypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People are living far longer than they used to and are not ready to retire at the age they used to. many need the income to support their longer livesKeypoint: A mandatory retirement is not fair/discriminatory", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement helps create space in the workforce for younger more educated workers.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be able to work for as long as they're healthy and able to do the job.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement contributes to leaving older people feeling directionless after being forced to stop working against their will. this contributes to high rates of depression and other mental illnesses in older populations.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement reduces the quality of life for those forced to retire", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People are living longer and we do not have the right to stop them from working if that is what they want to do.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement helps keep the work force young and vitalKeypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement allows job markets to be cleared of those that should be retired because of slowing of the cognitive processes associated with old age letting in younger job seekers.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should allow for everyone to work as long as they wish to provide for themselvesKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should end mandatory retirement because some people need to keep working in order to be able to afford to retire.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Forcing workers out of their position is unethical because it is likely to make them destitute and possibly homeless.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement reduces the quality of life for those forced to retire", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If people want to work passed a certain age it is their choiceKeypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement can force older, less-resilient workers out of the workforce, replacing them with younger, better workers.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement discriminates people based on their age, as it doesn't take into account the capacity of the individual to perform their job at a high level.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Individuals are the best arbiters of their own desires and good, they should be able to choose when to retire on their own. mandatory retirement strips people of their agency and choice.Keypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement helps create space in the workforce for younger more educated workers.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a person loves their job and isn't physically or mentally draining on them why should we force them to leave what they love? they may not be financially secure enough to retire as well.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not end mandatory retirement because the world is already over-populated and people need to retire so that others can back-fill their jobs.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement creates jobs for younger people who may otherwise struggle to find employment.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement should stop because older people should not be pushed out.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement results in the loss of institutional knowledge, which can have devastating consequences.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age harms the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Although elderly people may want to continue working to make more money it could be dangerous for their bodies to continue at a fast paced work environment. we have to look out for their safety.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should end mandatory retirement because it should be up to each individual what age they feel they are unable to work any longerKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be allowed to work for as long as they want and as long as they are capableKeypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many older people are perfectly capable of contributing to the workforce. they should not be punished by being forced to retire at a particular ageKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement removes experienced personnel form the rosters who still have many working years ahead of them due to longer life spans.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be allowed to retire when they are readyKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement is needed to keep businesses new and fresh with innovation from the younger generation.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should end mandatory retirement because no one has the right to tell another person when they have to stop working. it is an individual's choice and should be left up to them when they wish to call it quits.Keypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement brings too much stress to both businesses who are now out a knowledgeable employee and to the person who now no longer has employment.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement is not fair/discriminatory", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement put high-skilled workers out of jobs. putting a pressure in the working field and jeopardizing economic progressKeypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement discriminates based on age, not ability and should be endedKeypoint: A mandatory retirement is not fair/discriminatory", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement creates employment opportunities for the younger generation of workers, who would otherwise be increasingly shunted out.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Older employees have a wealth of knowledge and experience and forcing them to retire could put a company's productivity at risk.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement is age-based discrimination. it is discriminatory to assume that everyone who reaches the age of 65 or 70 is incompetent.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not force people out of the workplace if they can continue to offer skills to companies.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not end mandatory retirement because some jobs are dangerous and it would put the elderly people that choose to still work in danger and or others that are around themKeypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement helps combat unemployment among young people.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement ages are inconsistent with modern workplace practices and are contrary to the desire for age equalityKeypoint: A mandatory retirement is not fair/discriminatory", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement forces people who are still excellent at their jobs to quit working long before they are ready.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By forcing someone to retire it then means that spot is open for a younger person to fill the role, someone who could really use the moneyKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Forcing members of a profession to retire at a certain age creates an experience drain.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some people have not saved enough money to retire, so making retirement mandatory just forces our elderly into poverty.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement reduces the quality of life for those forced to retire", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Making people retire opens up positions for young people rather than leaving them at the bottom rung of careers forever.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement opens up jobs for those unemployeed or are starting out in the workplace.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Older workers tend to command far higher salaries than younger workers. mandatory retirement allows younger, cheaper workers to take the place of older, more expensive employees.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should have to retire at a certain age so jobs become available for younger people.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People who wish to continue working should be able to do soKeypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People who have gained a lot of wisdom and experience are an asset to any company and if they are perfectly healthy and wanting to continue to share their knowledge, they should have that option.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement allows job markets to be cleared of those that should be retired because of slowing of the cognitive processes associated with old age letting in younger job seekers.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement could force whole blocks of experienced veterans to retire every year, with a deleterious effect on industryKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age harms the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement having so many positive outcomes and the biggest one is that young people get experience and also in today digitalised world young people understand better than older generations.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement brings too much stress to both businesses who are now out a knowledgeable employee and to the person who now no longer has employment.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement is unconstitutional ageism because it discriminates on inalienable characteristics of the worker.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should end mandatory retirement because it is unfair to discriminate against people on the basis of their age when other forms of discrimination are illegalKeypoint: A mandatory retirement is not fair/discriminatory", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement allows new workers to take the place of older workers that are past their prime and just need to retire.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should end this because if people believe they are still able to work then let them. they may get depressed if they dont.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement ensures that at least some positions open up in a profession on a predictable basis. it allows younger workers to enter the field as older workers exit.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Forcing members of a profession to retire at a certain age creates an experience drainKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age harms the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some older workers love their job and would be devastated to be forced to stop workingKeypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should end mandatory retirement because a person should be able to work for as long as they wish as long as they do not pose as a safety threat to those around them.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If people are still able to do good work then there should be no reason to force them to retireKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People have the right to work until they wantKeypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A mandatory retirement age allows employers to be able to bring fresh talent into their workforceKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement often forces out the most skilled and experienced members of the labor force, meaning from an economic perspective it leads to declined productivity and quality of goods and services.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement is not fair/discriminatory", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement allows for youger generations to enter the workplaceKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some people are poor financial planners, some were dealt a bad hand in life and it's necessary to continue working past retirement or they won't be able to support themselves. it would create suffering.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement forces people to end careers before they are readyKeypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There aren't enough jobs for young peopleKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: With so many living longer and healthier lives we should embrace keeping them in the workforce.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People who are not financially prepared for retirement may not have the means to live out a financially secure retirement, and may be forced to go back to work at an even later age.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement reduces the quality of life for those forced to retire", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should end mandatory retirement cause not everybody wants to retire from their jobsKeypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement leaves openings in the job force for those that are stronger and more capable of doing the jobs.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not end mandatory retirement because it opens up positions to women, people of color, and immigrants who were not able to take those jobs due to past discrimination.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should end mandatory retirement because it stops elderly from being able to work if they are still physically ableKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement discriminates people based on their age, as it doesn't take into account the capacity of the individual to perform their job at a high level.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement is not fair/discriminatory", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement allows workplaces to free up jobs for younger workersKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement is harmful to the nation's productivity and economyKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age harms the economy", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement results in the loss of institutional knowledge, which can have devastating consequences.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be able to work as long as they want to.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Companies with a mandatory retirement policy might avoid becoming stale and outdated by constantly infusing their workforces with fresh talentKeypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement creates jobs for younger people who may otherwise struggle to find employment.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If the workers are still performing at an adequate level, they should not be forced to retire simply based on their age.Keypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory retirement is necessary and fair because it gives workers the opportunity to enjoy their old age without completing a workday. non-execution of mandatory retirement should not endKeypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement is a good way of refreshing the workforce, motivating those lower in the pecking order and creating employment opportunities.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: In today's society people are living to a greater age and we should not penalise those people who want to continue working by forcing them to retire.Keypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should end mandatory retirement some people have to work to supplement government pensions. it gives them social interaction which they may not have if they arent workingKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement is necessary in some fields to let go of the older, more error-prone workers.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many people that are forced into retirement often do not have the means of supporting themselves financially, and so either turn to part time, low-wage work or welfare to sustain themselves.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement reduces the quality of life for those forced to retire", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not end mandatory retirement because by having mandatory retirement it gives younger people jobsKeypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Its unfair to force people to quit workingKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement could force whole blocks of experienced veterans to retire every year, with a deleterious effect on industryKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many retirees are often below the poverty line, unable to heat their house and unable to eat a healthy diet. allow them the opportunity to work later in life to be able to improve their standard of lifeKeypoint: A mandatory retirement reduces the quality of life for those forced to retire", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a person loves their job and isn't physically or mentally draining on them why should we force them to leave what they love? they may not be financially secure enough to retire as well.Keypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement should continue because it keeps the workforce freshKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: As long as someone is capable of doing his job it should be his choice when to retire and not the decision of some bureaucrat.Keypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People shouldn't be forced to retire at a certain age because people all have different abilities at the same age and some can definitely still work.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement allows new workers to take the place of older workers that are past their prime and just need to retire.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement forces people to end careers before they are readyKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement is a form of age discrimination.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement is not fair/discriminatory", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement helps younger workers get jobsKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not end mandatory retirement because it helps to open new jobs and positions to the younger generations looking for jobs.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Citizens should have the right to choose when to withdrawKeypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement having so many positive outcomes and the biggest one is that young people get experience and also in today digitalised world young people understand better than older generations.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: No one should be forced to work or stop work against their will, this is hugely discriminatory and infringing on basic rightsKeypoint: A mandatory retirement is not fair/discriminatory", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The loss of experience and knowledge from mandatory retirement is costly to businessesKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age harms the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement is discriminatory and should be bannedKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Making people retire opens up positions for young people rather than leaving them at the bottom rung of careers forever.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People are valuable at any age and should be allowed to work for as long as they want toKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A worker should not be forced to retire if he feels he can still adequately produce for his employer.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should end mandatory retirement cause not everybody wants to retire from their jobsKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement opens up jobs for those unemployeed or are starting out in the workplace.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to free up jobs for people just entering the workforceKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement allow new workers a chanceKeypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A mandatory retirement age helps employers regularly refresh the workforce with fresh talentKeypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement helps keep the work force young and vitalKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Companies with a mandatory retirement policy might avoid becoming stale and outdated by constantly infusing their workforces with fresh talentKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should end mandatory retirement because elderly people often need their income from work to live.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement reduces the quality of life for those forced to retire", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Everyone should have the choice when to retire.Keypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: In today's society people are living to a greater age and we should not penalise those people who want to continue working by forcing them to retire.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement helps younger workers get jobsKeypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement puts pressure on the government to maintain social services for older people such as social security and pension programs that benefit society as a whole.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age harms the economy", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should end mandatory retirement because it's unthinkable that you could force someone to stop working. every human being should have the right to make that choice for themselves.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement is age discrimination and therefore should be ended.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement is not fair/discriminatory", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The workforce can benefit from the skills and experience of older workers.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement can force older, less-resilient workers out of the workforce, replacing them with younger, better workers.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should not be forced to retire if they are still in good health and can still be useful for their companies.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By pushing an older group of people out of a particular profession, this makes room for a younger generation to enter the workforceKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By freeing up space across professional hierarchies mandatory retirement provides more opportunities for career growth and upward mobility for younger people.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement fuels social isolation in older populations because we live in a society that encourages the development of social lives around your work.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement reduces the quality of life for those forced to retire", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement makes sure that fresh ideas and fresh bodies keep flowing through business which is a good thing.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement makes room in the workforce for younger more able bodied individuals to work.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People are living healthier longer now and forcing retirement based on arbitrary guidelines like age is a bad idea.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be allowed to work as long as they likeKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: No one should be forced to work or stop work against their will, this is hugely discriminatory and infringing on basic rightsKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement allows younger generations to get a fair chance to advance and is therefore necessary.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement leaves openings in the job force for those that are stronger and more capable of doing the jobs.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to force people into retirement to open up jobs for the younger generation.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not end mandatory retirement because people need to retire whether they realize it or not, it is not up to them, they of course have no free will.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should end this because if people believe they are still able to work then let them. they may get depressed if they dont.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement is not fair/discriminatory", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A mandatory retirement age allows employers to be able to bring fresh talent into their workforceKeypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retiremen pushes those with something still to contribute out of the workplace, which can be damaging to the persons wellbeing and healthKeypoint: A mandatory retirement reduces the quality of life for those forced to retire", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People entering the workforce are having trouble finding jobs. they cannot pay their bills and move up in life if not employed. unless older workers leave work, those trying to start work life cannot.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement is an extremely detrimental concept as businesses can lose their most valued and knowledgeable employeesKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age harms the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If the workers are still performing at an adequate level, they should not be forced to retire simply based on their age.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement should be ended as it is unfair on older people.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement should be ended as it is discriminatory.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement is not fair/discriminatory", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many retirees are often below the poverty line, unable to heat their house and unable to eat a healthy diet. allow them the opportunity to work later in life to be able to improve their standard of lifeKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should end mandatory retirement because it stops elderly from being able to work if they are still physically ableKeypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There aren't enough jobs for young peopleKeypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we don't have mandatory retirement, then it will be more difficult for the younger generation to receive promotions at work.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not end mandatory retirement because some people have hazardous jobs and they need to be forced to retire from them to let the younger people take overKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should not be forced to retire if they are still in good health and can still be useful for their companies.Keypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement creates a society that recognizes the unique needs of the older population and encourages social spending to support them.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not end mandatory retirement because people need to stop working and enjoy life before they die.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be allowed to retire when they are readyKeypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Older workers have more experience and expertise than young workers.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement makes room for younger workersKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement is not fair for those who are actually more than capable to carry on with their jobsKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement is age discrimination and shouldn't be allowed to happen.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By having mandatory retirement we are opening job positions for the younger people who need to being their workforce life. they bring new ideas to the workforce that will benefit society.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Forcing workers out of their position is unethical because it is likely to make them destitute and possibly homeless.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement allows for youger generations to enter the workplaceKeypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement is age discrimination and therefore should be ended.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People are living healthier longer now and forcing retirement based on arbitrary guidelines like age is a bad idea.Keypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: For people who work in skilled manual jobs it comes to a point where it is no longer safe for them work, the retirement age is used to protect people of a certain age as a safety precautionKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Forcing members of a profession to retire at a certain age creates an experience drain.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age harms the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should end mandatory retirement because if a person feels like working, there should not be anything to stop them.Keypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should end mandatory retirement because is important in economics highKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: With so many living longer and healthier lives we should embrace keeping them in the workforce.Keypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some people have not saved enough money to retire, so making retirement mandatory just forces our elderly into poverty.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement put high-skilled workers out of jobs. putting a pressure in the working field and jeopardizing economic progressKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should have the choice to retire when they are able or want to. if someone wants to continue working for as long as the choose, that should be their right to do so.Keypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement lets companies more easily make space for new workers that have more of an incentive to work hard at a new job.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retiremen pushes those with something still to contribute out of the workplace, which can be damaging to the persons wellbeing and healthKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age harms the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People who wish to continue working should be able to do soKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should end mandatory retirement because if a person feels like working, there should not be anything to stop them.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A mandatory retirement age helps employers regularly refresh the workforce with fresh talentKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If people want to work passed a certain age it is their choiceKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People who are not financially prepared for retirement may not have the means to live out a financially secure retirement, and may be forced to go back to work at an even later age.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be able to choose when they retire.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement is necessary to free jobs for young peopleKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should end mandatory retirement because is important in economics highKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age harms the economy", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement is harsh. it pushes workers who might still be viable out of the workforce for no other reason than their age, often leaving them to struggle.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People are living far longer than they used to and are not ready to retire at the age they used to. many need the income to support their longer livesKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age harms the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: As long as someone is capable of doing his job it should be his choice when to retire and not the decision of some bureaucrat.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement put high-skilled workers out of jobs. putting a pressure in the working field and jeopardizing economic progressKeypoint: A mandatory retirement reduces the quality of life for those forced to retire", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If someone can still work they should be allowed. it will cause less strain on social security.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It forces more qualified people out of jobs & replaces them with less qualified peopleKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age harms the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement is not fair for those who are actually more than capable to carry on with their jobsKeypoint: A mandatory retirement is not fair/discriminatory", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement put high-skilled workers out of jobs. putting a pressure in the working field and jeopardizing economic progressKeypoint: A mandatory retirement is not fair/discriminatory", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People are now living longer and staying healthy. they should be able to work as long as they are able to and contribute to our society.Keypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement removes experienced personnel form the rosters who still have many working years ahead of them due to longer life spans.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age harms the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not end mandatory retirement for a few reasons. the older workers are clogging up positions that the younger generations need to start their careers. the older workers also aren't as efficient.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement keeps professions and companies lively and dynamicKeypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People have the right to work until they wantKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement brings too much stress to both businesses who are now out a knowledgeable employee and to the person who now no longer has employment.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age harms the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some people are not ready to retire at the mandatory age and want to keep workingKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not force people out of the workplace if they can continue to offer skills to companies.Keypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People are living longer and healthier lives and often wish to continue working.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should end mandatory retirement some people have to work to supplement government pensions. it gives them social interaction which they may not have if they arent workingKeypoint: A mandatory retirement reduces the quality of life for those forced to retire", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement helps combat unemployment among young people.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement allows workplaces to free up jobs for younger workersKeypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement creates employment opportunities for the younger generation of workers, who would otherwise be increasingly shunted out.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People are now living longer and staying healthy. they should be able to work as long as they are able to and contribute to our society.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement ensures that at least some positions open up in a profession on a predictable basis. it allows younger workers to enter the field as older workers exit.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should allow for everyone to work as long as they wish to provide for themselvesKeypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Forcing members of a profession to retire at a certain age creates an experience drainKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By freeing up space across professional hierarchies mandatory retirement provides more opportunities for career growth and upward mobility for younger people.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some people are not ready to retire at the mandatory age and want to keep workingKeypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should end this because if people believe they are still able to work then let them. they may get depressed if they dont.Keypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without a mandatory retirement younger workers would have decreased opportunities for promotionKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some people are poor financial planners, some were dealt a bad hand in life and it's necessary to continue working past retirement or they won't be able to support themselves. it would create suffering.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age harms the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The questionable health of older members of society should not be put at risk by making them work into old age, therefore we should keep mandatory retirement.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People are living longer and healthier lives and often wish to continue working.Keypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement fuels social isolation in older populations because we live in a society that encourages the development of social lives around your work.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some older workers love their job and would be devastated to be forced to stop workingKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should end mandatory retirement as it is ageist and outdated and people should be given the opportunity to work for as long as they feel able.Keypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Citizens should have the right to choose when to withdrawKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we end mandatory retirement many older workers that want to retire after many years of service may be denied that rightKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement forces people who are still excellent at their jobs to quit working long before they are ready.Keypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some people are able to work way beyond the regular retirement age. they should be able work as long as they want and continue to be productive.Keypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A worker should not be forced to retire if he feels he can still adequately produce for his employer.Keypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement is necessary to free jobs for young peopleKeypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement is needed to keep businesses new and fresh with innovation from the younger generation.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Older employees have a wealth of knowledge and experience and forcing them to retire could put a company's productivity at risk.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age harms the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many people that are forced into retirement often do not have the means of supporting themselves financially, and so either turn to part time, low-wage work or welfare to sustain themselves.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement is a good way of refreshing the workforce, motivating those lower in the pecking order and creating employment opportunities.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory retirement is necessary and fair because it gives workers the opportunity to enjoy their old age without completing a workday. non-execution of mandatory retirement should not endKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement ages are inconsistent with modern workplace practices and are contrary to the desire for age equalityKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should end mandatory retirement because it's unthinkable that you could force someone to stop working. every human being should have the right to make that choice for themselves.Keypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we don't have mandatory retirement, then it will be more difficult for the younger generation to receive promotions at work.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Although elderly people may want to continue working to make more money it could be dangerous for their bodies to continue at a fast paced work environment. we have to look out for their safety.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should have the choice to retire when they are able or want to. if someone wants to continue working for as long as the choose, that should be their right to do so.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not end mandatory retirement for a few reasons. the older workers are clogging up positions that the younger generations need to start their careers. the older workers also aren't as efficient.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement is unconstitutional ageism because it discriminates on inalienable characteristics of the worker.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement is not fair/discriminatory", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many older people are perfectly capable of contributing to the workforce. they should not be punished by being forced to retire at a particular ageKeypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By pushing an older group of people out of a particular profession, this makes room for a younger generation to enter the workforceKeypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement should end because it cuts everyone off at a certain age. many people are able to work and need to work well past that age.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should end this because if people believe they are still able to work then let them. they may get depressed if they dont.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age harms the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People are valuable at any age and should be allowed to work for as long as they want toKeypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be able to continue working if they chooseKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be allowed to work for as long as they want and as long as they are capableKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By forcing someone to retire it then means that spot is open for a younger person to fill the role, someone who could really use the moneyKeypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement makes room in the workforce for younger more able bodied individuals to work.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement is harsh. it pushes workers who might still be viable out of the workforce for no other reason than their age, often leaving them to struggle.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement reduces the quality of life for those forced to retire", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should end this because if people believe they are still able to work then let them. they may get depressed if they dont.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement reduces the quality of life for those forced to retire", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be able to work for as long as they're healthy and able to do the job.Keypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement makes sure that fresh ideas and fresh bodies keep flowing through business which is a good thing.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement ensures a turnaround of the workforce and positions at entry levelKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without a mandatory retirement younger workers would have decreased opportunities for promotionKeypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement should be ended as it is discriminatory.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement contributes to leaving older people feeling directionless after being forced to stop working against their will. this contributes to high rates of depression and other mental illnesses in older populations.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Older workers have more experience and expertise than young workers.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age harms the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: As people age they automatically become less cognitively and physically responsive. mandatory retirement makes sure that professions are filled with people who are at their peak of cognitive and physical performance.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement should end because it cuts everyone off at a certain age. many people are able to work and need to work well past that age.Keypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not end mandatory retirement because by having mandatory retirement it gives younger people jobsKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should end mandatory retirement because a person should be able to work for as long as they wish as long as they do not pose as a safety threat to those around them.Keypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Its unfair to force people to quit workingKeypoint: A mandatory retirement is not fair/discriminatory", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It should be allowed so younger people can get into the workplace.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to force people into retirement to open up jobs for the younger generation.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement is harmful to the nation's productivity and economyKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory requirement would inject a new energy and innovation into any given field, and would combat unemployment among young peopleKeypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be able to choose when they retire.Keypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Individuals are the best arbiters of their own desires and good, they should be able to choose when to retire on their own. mandatory retirement strips people of their agency and choice.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not end mandatory retirement because current workers benefited from the policy and should have to 'pay it forward' to younger people.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be allowed to work as long as they likeKeypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement should be ended as it is unfair on older people.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement is not fair/discriminatory", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not end mandatory retirement because people need to stop working and enjoy life before they die.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement allows younger generations to get a fair chance to advance and is therefore necessary.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement ensures a turnaround of the workforce and positions at entry levelKeypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should end mandatory retirement because it should be up to each individual what age they feel they are unable to work any longerKeypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not end mandatory retirement because it helps to open new jobs and positions to the younger generations looking for jobs.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement helps younger generations by opening up more positions in the workforceKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to free up jobs for people just entering the workforceKeypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should end mandatory retirement because it discriminates against people due to their age, which is beyond their control.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If people are still able to do good work then there should be no reason to force them to retireKeypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People who have gained a lot of wisdom and experience are an asset to any company and if they are perfectly healthy and wanting to continue to share their knowledge, they should have that option.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age harms the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People are living longer and we do not have the right to stop them from working if that is what they want to do.Keypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some people are able to work way beyond the regular retirement age. they should be able work as long as they want and continue to be productive.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This gives young people a chance to workKeypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People are living far longer than they used to and are not ready to retire at the age they used to. many need the income to support their longer livesKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement lets companies more easily make space for new workers that have more of an incentive to work hard at a new job.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement is discriminatory and should be bannedKeypoint: A mandatory retirement is not fair/discriminatory", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The workforce can benefit from the skills and experience of older workers.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age harms the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People are living far longer than they used to and are not ready to retire at the age they used to. many need the income to support their longer livesKeypoint: We should let everyone retire when they are ready", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement makes room for younger workersKeypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People are living far longer than they used to and are not ready to retire at the age they used to. many need the income to support their longer livesKeypoint: A mandatory retirement reduces the quality of life for those forced to retire", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should end mandatory retirement because no one has the right to tell another person when they have to stop working. it is an individual's choice and should be left up to them when they wish to call it quits.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement is an extremely detrimental concept as businesses can lose their most valued and knowledgeable employeesKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is beneficial for companies to bring in fresh faces and ideas so that the company does not get stagnatKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It should be allowed so younger people can get into the workplace.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age creates opportunities for other workers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Older workers tend to command far higher salaries than younger workers. mandatory retirement allows younger, cheaper workers to take the place of older, more expensive employees.Keypoint: Mandatory retirement age benefits those that are about to be retired", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The loss of experience and knowledge from mandatory retirement is costly to businessesKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement discriminates based on age, not ability and should be endedKeypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mandatory retirement is unfair to those who will still need the income to survive after a certain age.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement age decreases institutional knowledge", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some people are poor financial planners, some were dealt a bad hand in life and it's necessary to continue working past retirement or they won't be able to support themselves. it would create suffering.Keypoint: A mandatory retirement reduces the quality of life for those forced to retire", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - } - ] -} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/tasks/task1297_kpa_keypoint_matching_nuclear_weapons_topic.json b/tasks/task1297_kpa_keypoint_matching_nuclear_weapons_topic.json deleted file mode 100644 index 71409b220..000000000 --- a/tasks/task1297_kpa_keypoint_matching_nuclear_weapons_topic.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,1060 +0,0 @@ -{ - "Contributors": [ - "Arjun Ashok" - ], - "Source": [ - "ArgKP (https://github.com/IBM/KPA_2021_shared_task)" - ], - "Definition": "The input contains an argument and a keypoint on the topic \"We should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons\", separated by \"\".Your task is to answer if the keypoint matches the argument and summarizes exactly what the argument means, in the context of this topic.", - "Categories": [ - "Classification -> Verification -> Summary Verification", - "Text Comparison" - ], - "Domains": [ - "Reviews", - "Law", - "Government and Politics", - "Dialogue" - ], - "Input_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Output_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Instruction_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Positive Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Having nuclear weapons actually stops nations from going to war because of the fear of how it might escalateKeypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that having nuclear weapons actually stops nations from going to war because of the fear of how it might escalate" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The use of nuclear weapons is a good tool to guard against mutual destruction.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that the use of nuclear weapons is a good tool to guard against mutual destruction." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons have a capacity to wipe out an entire nationKeypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that nuclear weapons have a capacity to wipe out an entire nation" - } - ], - "Negative Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons stop countries from attacking those that hold them and therefore protect those countries.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that nuclear weapons stop countries from attacking those that hold them and therefore protect those countries." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons aid in deterring other countries from attacks and also symbolizes a countries world power.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that nuclear weapons aid in deterring other countries from attacks and also symbolizes a countries world power." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nothing good comes from nuclear weapons. humans need to get along and work together for a better world instead of finding new ways to destroy the enemy.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that nothing good comes from nuclear weapons. humans need to get along and work together for a better world instead of finding new ways to destroy the enemy." - } - ], - "Instances": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Having nuclear weapons increases nation's power and statusKeypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons will destroy all life it is not banned.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should allow for nuclear weapons for without it, the world will be tortured by people who have no morals and will slowly kill us all.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The potential destruction to our entire planet is on the line so we must fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons present a balance between the great powers of the world.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons also provide a safety net for countries in case of an attack and should not be banned.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons are the most dangerous thing on earth and should be abolishedKeypoint: Nuclear weapons provoke or escalate a disastrous military action", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They are a valuable deterrant to having another world war.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The abolition of nuclear weapons is a hugely important goal on the path to world peace.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons provide a deterrent for starting a major conflict.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The immediate results of a nuclear attack are already devastating, but the lasting effects make it that much more cruel.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Allowing nations to have nuclear weapons contributes to peace as nobody wants to start a war that will result in mutual destruction.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Having nuclear weapons acts as a deterrent for other nations who also have them, it means they will not use theirs against us as we would retaliate wiping them out too so they prevent war.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons are needed as a prevention measure.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons should not be abolished because we need them to defend our countryKeypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons create unnecessary political tensionKeypoint: Nuclear weapons provoke or escalate a disastrous military action", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The united states, at least, needs nuclear weapons for protection in order to deter other countries from attacking.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons, as any other weapons, can be used for protection, deterrence, and ensuring rather than disrupting safety. our goal should be to control the proliferation of nuclear weapons rather than get rid of them.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons prevent conflicts from dragging onward because once they are used involved countries lose the motivation to continue fighting (re: hiroshima and nagasaki).Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons should be abolished since it is inconceivable that they could be ever used because of the catestrophic consequencesKeypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear explosions are incredibly bad for the environment: killing all organisms and causing a drop in global temperature and rainfall. the changes are so harmful to the earth and humans that we must abolish nuclear weapons.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By doing away with nuclear weapons, we can make the world safer from war and accidental explosions.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It would make everyone safer if nuclear weapons did not exist.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons provoke or escalate a disastrous military action", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Destroying nuclear bombs would work to a nations disadvantage because they will be vulnerable to attacksKeypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons are dangerous when possessed by a country that places no value on human lifeKeypoint: Nuclear weapons provoke or escalate a disastrous military action", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The threat of nuclear weapons keeps despots and tyrants in check.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons are a deterent to mutual destructionKeypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons are one of the biggest threats facing humanity today. abolishing them would eliminate that threat.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons are a huge deterent to our enemiesKeypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are still dangerous countries that don't possess nuclear weapons and that is what prevents them from attacking a country that has themKeypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons because they turn short term political problems into permanent environmental problems.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is a risk of terrorists getting a nuclear weapon and creating a dirty bomb capable of destroying cities with millions of citizens.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should because they are extremely dangerous.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear war will destroy the entire planet.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Any use of nuclear weapons in war would result in mutually assured destruction and likely the devastation of the entire planet, and any amount of conventional warfare is preferable to that outcome.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons because the use of nuclear weapons can destroy an entire city or country.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abolish nuclear weapons as it will only encourage countries to develop other weaponry in order to have either a deterrent or a force against other countries.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons because if our country was ever attacked with nuclear weapons, we need to be able to fight back.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight to abolition nuclear weapons because if they get in the wrong hands many people will be killedKeypoint: Nuclear weapons provoke or escalate a disastrous military action", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: All nuclear weapons should be abolished. the bombs strike at innocent people not just soldiers. the bombs can knock out cities. true devastation are the results of them.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should continue to support nuclear weapons because there will be a day our country will regret not having the bigger and better weapon to defend our country.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons are a necessary latent defence mechanism, holding that potential prevents actual conflict because the unspoken threat protects usKeypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: These weapons could kill an entire state of people at once, they are too dangerous.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons provoke or escalate a disastrous military action", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: As long as nuclear weapons exist people will confuse missile-like objects in the sky for nukes, which causes massive public terrors that are very bad for states and individual people.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons can bring about a certain level of respectKeypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons are only safe if the leaders in charge can be trusted. it would only take one leader to destroy the whole planet.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons as they can cause catastrophic consequences and can cause unspeakable suffering.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons provoke or escalate a disastrous military action", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The use of nuclear weapons would cause the complete annihilation of both the attacker and the defender.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons because it lead to more power for the country and lowers the chance of a nuclear warKeypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should get rid of it because there are to many risks involvedKeypoint: Nuclear weapons provoke or escalate a disastrous military action", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons create unnecessary political tensionsKeypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons present a threat to global security when they are in the hands of dictators.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons provoke or escalate a disastrous military action", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Every country talking about peace and at the same time building and producing more nuclear weapons which should be stopped and only way for that is abolition.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons are too dangerous to keep. we must get rid of all of them or face a nuclear winter.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons is dangerour for all people and should be bannedKeypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Testing of nuclear weapons causes pollution and destruction of the environment.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons are currently the most destructive weapons available today. they kill or maim not only the combatants but innocent people and children.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If no country had nuclear weapons the world would be a safer place.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons are a necessary evil that have kept the peace in uncertain timesKeypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons are dangerous in the hands of dictators, who could use them to cause mass destruction.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons have ensured that there has not been a third world war because of the destructive threatKeypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If nuclear weapons fall into the wrong hands, e.g. terrorist regimes, they can be used for nefarious purposes.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons create unnecessary political tensionKeypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not live in a world where there is a threat of a nuclear weapon being used and therefore we should fight to ban them.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should because they are extremely dangerous.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons provoke or escalate a disastrous military action", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons are very volatile and should be done away with.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If all nuclear weapons were destroyed then the world would be a safer place.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons encourage global stability and increase peace.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons are a strong argument to stop any possible foreign aggressionKeypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons since just having nuclear weapons deters another nation from starting a major conflict with us.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons present a threat to global security when they are in the hands of dictators.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons are deadly and eventually we might need them.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A terrorist group with a nuclear weapon could cause immense and immediate damage and devastation.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Abolishing nuclear weapons is the only way to ensure that those weapons never fall in the hands of nefarious actors, such as terrorist organizations.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons are a safety net that we should useKeypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons should not be abolished because they provide a safety net. rogue nations have fear of the power of nuclear weapons.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight for the abolition nuclear weapons because of the dangers involved. misuse of nuclear weapons could lead to another world l war.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Abolishing nuclear weapons is an unrealistic goal. the technology exists and it will be used.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: These weapons could kill an entire state of people at once, they are too dangerous.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Our goal should be the abolition of nuclear weapons because a nuclear war would likely destroy the world.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons provoke or escalate a disastrous military action", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons are the only thing keeping some countries safe from another country. getting rid of them would cause immediate deaths from the resulting wars.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons because even one nuclear strike could lead to mutually assured destruction.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Arms races which result from the presence of nuclear weapons increase danger as states are more likely to entrust nukes to less experienced military personnel and have more difficulty tracking them.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons provoke or escalate a disastrous military action", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: As long as nuclear weapons exist, the entire world has to worry about nations deciding to fire them at another or terrorists getting hold of them and causing disasterKeypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons must be maintained as a deterrent to full scale nuclear war, as mutually assured destruction may very well prevent all out nuclear war.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Fallout from nuclear weapons gets carried across the world by the wind, we must abolish nuclear weapons so that conflicts between individual states don't cause nuclear damage in neighboring states.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons are the only way to achieve orderKeypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons being around is a big reason wars have not started.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons can be fired remotely. they do not require a battlefield presence and thus are not a direct threat to personnel.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Abolishing nuclear weapons is a good action to take. nuclear weapons are dangerous and could expose the planets to extreme destructionKeypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons will result in world destruction and should be abolishedKeypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons, by virtue of the principle of mutual assured destruction, have made another great war between global powers impossible.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Any use of nuclear weapons in war would result in mutually assured destruction and likely the devastation of the entire planet, and any amount of conventional warfare is preferable to that outcome.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons provoke or escalate a disastrous military action", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons as they can cause catastrophic consequences and can cause unspeakable suffering.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons because if someone sets them off it would be the end of the world as we know itKeypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Countries with nuclear weapons are better able to defend themselves than countries without.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons because there is no safe way to dispose of the warheads that they use, and at least now they are well maintained and monitored.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons have helped keep the peace in a dangerous and uncertain world for several decadesKeypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons shouldn't exist and if used erroneously could destroy the planetKeypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons are effective in creating a stand-off between counties that have them. this can result in less people dying.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Having nuclear weapons lowers the chance of a nuclear war because no one will mess with a country that will use them because it is used the war will end instant due to the country being wiped off the mapKeypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons act as a deterrent, getting rid of them could mean rebel countries using theirs with no threat of retaliationKeypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Even if nations were able to survive a nuclear war, they resulting nuclear fallout and climate change would likely make life on earth difficult for centuries to come, dooming future generations.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons have the ability to destroy the entire human race and should be banned.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons to ensure a safe future for our children and the world.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons are a symbol of power and strength that can prevent other countries from attacks, giving us a place as a world power.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons are much less costly than the massive numbers of conventional weapons which would be required to replace them.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We can't guarantee that our enemies would not create them behind our back, and then obliterate us.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons actually promote peace as the threat of their use discourages strife.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By having nuclear weapons the world has managed to avoid a major war. they act as an insurance policy.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Having nuclear weapons is a protective measure ensuring other countries with them are unlikely to launch attacks.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We can't trust every nuclear power to denuclearize, keeping some weapons in stock keeps peace.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight for the abolition nuclear weapons because of the dangers involved. misuse of nuclear weapons could lead to another world l war.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons provoke or escalate a disastrous military action", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Abolishing nuclear weapons is the only way to ensure that those weapons never fall in the hands of nefarious actors, such as terrorist organizations.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons provoke or escalate a disastrous military action", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Disarming all states will make them susceptible when one corrupt state or non-state actor doesn't follow the rules. when everyone has nuclear weapons, there is more of a check on individual dangerous actors.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight for the absolution of nuclear weapons so that the world can have the best chance of everlasting peace. there would be no threat of these weapons destroying the world.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons cause wars and are not a sufficient deterrentKeypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons because they pose an existential threat to civilization.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons provoke or escalate a disastrous military action", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A country should have the right to defend itself in whatever way it sees fit even if they do not intend to use nuclear weapons.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons are an effective threat that have prevented world war for 70 yearsKeypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If nuclear weapons fall into the wrong hands, e.g. terrorist regimes, they can be used for nefarious purposes.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons provoke or escalate a disastrous military action", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons development leads to other non-combative discoveries, such as nuclear energy.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons are being developed by governments that cannot be assured of judicial usage, leaving the planet vulnerable to destructionKeypoint: Nuclear weapons provoke or escalate a disastrous military action", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons are being developed by governments that cannot be assured of judicial usage, leaving the planet vulnerable to destructionKeypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The threat of nuclear weapons helps keep other countries from declaring wars.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The theory of \"mutual assured destruction\" is viable today as much as it was in the cold war, and the result is relative peaceKeypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: As it is becoming increasingly obvious that they are too dangerous to keep. they cause devastating destruction and in the wrong hands could cause the end of the world.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Countries that abolish nuclear weapons will leave themselves defenseless to the countries that refuse to.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons help to keep the peace between countries; abolition would potentially see some of the stock filter into terrorist hands, and become exponentially more dangerous.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons promote diplomacy as a solution to conflict.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Just having the ability to use a nuclear weapon often can be a deterrent.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons help to insure that other countries will not attach because they in turn will most certainly be destroyed.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons put everyone at risk and protect no one; there is no reason to keep them.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons provoke or escalate a disastrous military action", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons shouldn't exist and if used erroneously could destroy the planetKeypoint: Nuclear weapons provoke or escalate a disastrous military action", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to stop creating and hoarding weapons that can potentially destroy the entire planetKeypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear deterrent stops one country from attacking another for fear that the other country could retaliate with nuclear weapons so, by removing that deterrent, the risk becomes greaterKeypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons do not keep the peace; they breed fear and mistrust among nations.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons are dangerous in the hands of dictators, who could use them to cause mass destruction.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons provoke or escalate a disastrous military action", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The stockpiling of nuclear weapons ensures that other countries will not attempt to attack. the concept of mutual destruction is a great barrier to nuclear war.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons kill thousands of innocent civilians, men, women and children.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons are important in the fight against those who want to hurt their enemiesKeypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons are dangerous in the hands of evil dictators.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons provoke or escalate a disastrous military action", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The one occasion where neclear weapon has been used has brought to the world unimaginable suffering and death. we definately don't want to try that again.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons are a good defense and allows a nation to protect themselvesKeypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a country uses nuclear weapons and another country responds by also using nuclear weapons both will be destroyedKeypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons because countries have them to protect themselves against other countriesKeypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons have the capability to destroy civilization at a stoke, and are far too dangerous to be in the hands of any individual country.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Don't let anyone fool you with talks about deterrence and so-called \"nuclear peace\" - weapons are made to kill, this is their sole purpose. and nuclear weapons are made to kill millions! they are pure evil.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons have a capacity to wipe out an entire nationKeypoint: Nuclear weapons provoke or escalate a disastrous military action", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons are the only thing keeping some countries from fighting.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Having nuclear weapons provides a good defense and a strong offense against threatening countries.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons are dangerous in the hands of evil dictators.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons become more and more of a threat as they age and more countries seek to acquire them as well as terrorists as the weapons proliferate.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons provoke or escalate a disastrous military action", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The u. s needs nuclear weapons, just having them prevents other countries from attacking us.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The only reason nuclear weapons exist is so one country has the ability to destroy another country or force them into submission. the only thing they do is murder.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons are only safe if the leaders in charge can be trusted. it would only take one leader to destroy the whole planet.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons provoke or escalate a disastrous military action", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The choice presented to the human society is simple: either live in constant fear of the other and go down in a spectacular feat of self-destruction, or finally evolve and put an end to nuclear weapons.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons have proved to be an effective way of keeping peace between the superpowersKeypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight to abolition nuclear weapons because if they get in the wrong hands many people will be killedKeypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is a risk of terrorists getting a nuclear weapon and creating a dirty bomb capable of destroying cities with millions of citizens.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons provoke or escalate a disastrous military action", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons because they pose an existential threat to civilization.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They provide security in the form of mutually assured destructionKeypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nuclear weapons are a strong defense for countries against the possible aggression of others. it doesn't have to be used, but the threat of it keeps others is line. ,Keypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we abolish nuclear weapons, we make ourselves vulnerable to attackKeypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't fight to get rid of nuclear weapons. they provide a deterrent to serious conflict because even the smaller countries who have nuclear weapons pose a threatKeypoint: Nuclear weapons is essential for protection and deterrence", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The use of nuclear weapons would cause the complete annihilation of both the attacker and the defender.Keypoint: Nuclear weapons provoke or escalate a disastrous military action", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - } - ] -} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/tasks/task1298_kpa_keypoint_matching_urbanization_topic.json b/tasks/task1298_kpa_keypoint_matching_urbanization_topic.json deleted file mode 100644 index 4612964dd..000000000 --- a/tasks/task1298_kpa_keypoint_matching_urbanization_topic.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2584 +0,0 @@ -{ - "Contributors": [ - "Arjun Ashok" - ], - "Source": [ - "ArgKP (https://github.com/IBM/KPA_2021_shared_task)" - ], - "Definition": "The input contains an argument and a keypoint on the topic \"We should fight urbanization\", separated by \"\".Your task is to answer if the keypoint matches the argument and summarizes exactly what the argument means, in the context of this topic.", - "Categories": [ - "Classification -> Verification -> Summary Verification", - "Text Comparison" - ], - "Domains": [ - "Reviews", - "Law", - "Government and Politics", - "Dialogue" - ], - "Input_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Output_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Instruction_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Positive Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization can create job opportunities people benefit from improved facilities such as hospitals schools shops etcKeypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that urbanization can create job opportunities people benefit from improved facilities such as hospitals schools shops etc" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should stop urbanization because of the pollution and over crowding problems it causes.Keypoint: Urbanization causes crime", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that we should stop urbanization because of the pollution and over crowding problems it causes." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization leads to the destruction of many animals and plants.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that urbanization leads to the destruction of many animals and plants." - } - ], - "Negative Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization ruins the environment and pushes out existing animal species from their homes.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that urbanization ruins the environment and pushes out existing animal species from their homes." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization helps to create jobs & new opportunities for peopleKeypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that urbanization helps to create jobs & new opportunities for people" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization allows populations easier access to food and services that improve quality of life.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that urbanization allows populations easier access to food and services that improve quality of life." - } - ], - "Instances": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is something that shouldn't happen because of poverty and overcrowding.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization can cause an increase in crime rates and pollutionKeypoint: Urbanization is causing a strain on the cities' resources", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight urbanization because simply due to increase in poverty and pollution in term of when more people more water usage, more land clearing and other waste and this cause health problemKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is a necessary part of economic expansion and improvement.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Too much urbanization means less green space for people to enjoy and disturbs nature that resides there.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The more crowded a place become the more crime rises.Keypoint: Urbanization causes crime", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is destroying the countryside and the habitat of many animals.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization ghettos up an area and ruins it making it too populated and more crimes happenKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight urbanization because some parts of nature have been destroyed.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization ghettos up an area and ruins it making it too populated and more crimes happenKeypoint: Urbanization causes crime", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization destroys valuable green space and contributes to the planet's ever growing pollution problem.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are less farms that can support a family. people who want access to things like great libraries, hospitals, theaters, need to live in a metropolis.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is a grave threat to our environment and it should be stopped.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is inevitable in the current environment, as most of the jobs and opportunities are in the big cities - we should focus on making the best of it rather than stopping it entirely.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization should be fought as it has a negative impact on rural areas as more and more leave those areas to move to cities.Keypoint: Urbanization causes crime", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not fight urbanization because it gives people places to live and workKeypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization from village areas brings in more workforce which could help the economyKeypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization leads to more concentrated pockets of pollution.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is destroying green resources, and we should really care more about our planet rather than new constructions.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization damages the environment.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization provides housing and jobs to areas that need it.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is a necessary part of economic expansion and improvement.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization can increase over crowding which in turn can lead to a rise in crime.Keypoint: Urbanization causes crime", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization provides more economic opportunities in areas that desperately need them.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization brings jobs, and is good for the economy.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight urbanization because it causes smog and air pollutionKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization helps poorer people in rural areas who lack the resources they need to survive. urbanization eliminates the obstacles such as transportation, medical care access.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not fight urbanization as growth only provides more opportunities for a community.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization has no regards to environmental protection and causes severe pollutionKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization contributes to pollution and overcrowding which also causes rents to rise that can displace a family that is already struggling to meet its needs.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is destructive to nature and soon we will have none left if we aren't careful.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization for people living in the country would be a good thing. it would be easier for them to have closer access to stores and other important places and this could make it happen.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nature provides habitat to hundreds of native species. if urbanization continues, they will be at risk of extinction and once the damage has been done, it cannot be reversed.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight urbanization to protect the ozone layerKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization damages the environment.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization brings jobs, and is good for the economy.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to continue to fight urbanization because the cities are getting way too over populated in which the government can not fully support efficiently.Keypoint: Urbanization is causing a strain on the cities' resources", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are a lot more job opportunities for people in urban centers.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is destroying green resources, and we should really care more about our planet rather than new constructions.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is bad because it means leads to more pollution.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization creates overcrowded places with high crimeKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight urbanization to protect the ozone layerKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization leads to more cars and more pollution. this in turn leads to ill health.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The more crowded a place become the more crime rises.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization results in overcrowding in cities. the cities become more pollute, more congested. streets are full of cars. resources suc as sewer, water and infrastructure are strained.Keypoint: Urbanization is causing a strain on the cities' resources", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization helps people find better jobsKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is killing off nature and its habitantsKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be allowed to go where they wish to live and work and inevitably they will wish to go to developed areas for greater job opportunities and amenities.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization creates spaces that are unhealthy and crime riddenKeypoint: Urbanization causes crime", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Quick urbanization usually happens in unscrupulous ways with worker abuse and immense pollution.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization creates an area of poor quality of life, overcrowded, polluted streets, and a hub for crimeKeypoint: Urbanization causes crime", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many of our natural habitats and ecosystems have been lost to urbanization, thereby rendering some many species of animals endangeredKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should all be against urbanization. rural areas are very important to growing crops and goods from animals. these industrial buildings create a lot of pollution as well.Keypoint: Urbanization causes crime", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization creates spaces that are unhealthy and crime riddenKeypoint: Urbanization is causing a strain on the cities' resources", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is just the natural consequence of life and there's no need to fight it. we all need homes and places to shop. it's going to happen, just embrace it.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should stop urbanization because of the pollution and over crowding problems it causes.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is leading to pollution, traffic congestion, and dense populations. this puts pressure on every infrastructure, and forces prices of everything to rise. cities have trouble meeting basic needsKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A city is the best place for people to have what they need near byKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is the most efficient manner of structuring a community to enable access to public spaces, amenities, healthcare, public transport, schools and reduce the need for long car journeysKeypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization packs more people into smaller spaces causing more crime, pollution and diseases.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization means affordable housing, access to supportive resources and community services, and better healthcare for the area.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization has everything nearby some those that can't travel far will have everything they need close to themKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization destroys the natural beauty of the area and should be fought againstKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight urbanization because more populous areas also see an increase in crime.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight urbanization as it eats up our green spaces which we need to provide oxygen and food.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization can enable people to have closer access to key services such as hospitals and supermarkets.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanzation result in homelessness, inner city poverty and a huge drain on limited public services , so we should move away from this to provide better opportunities in less developed areas.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight urbanization because we need to conserve trees.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization can enable people to have closer access to key services such as hospitals and supermarkets.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization helps poorer people in rural areas who lack the resources they need to survive. urbanization eliminates the obstacles such as transportation, medical care access.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization destroys nature and increases pollution.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization helps people stay close to the stuff they need like grocery storesKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization creates overcrowding and pollutionKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to have land that is not urban to support natureKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization helps people stay close to the stuff they need like grocery storesKeypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization allows people easier access to jobs, transportation and health care providers.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need more housing for people and so we need to urbanize more.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight urbanization because it leads to air pollutionKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Grouping people together as in urbanization, makes it easier to control crimes and puts them closer to necessary medical facilities.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is destructive to nature and soon we will have none left if we aren't careful.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization causes more crime, more pollution, and destroys the environment.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight urbanization because it leads to more harms than good. cities have increased pollution, drug use, and crime as opposed to rural areas. there is more homeless in cities as well.Keypoint: Urbanization is causing a strain on the cities' resources", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization leads to a loss of small town identities, unsightly urban skyscrapers, and a mass increase of pollution.Keypoint: Urbanization causes crime", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is essentially unavoidable to allow us to live in proximity to necessary services and amenities, employment and friends and familyKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization allows people access to transportation and medical services.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization creates population centers where major companies would establish themselves which makes it easier to get jobsKeypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be allowed to go where they wish to live and work and inevitably they will wish to go to developed areas for greater job opportunities and amenities.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not fight urbanization because it creates more jobs, more jobs more incomesKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanisation increases crime since there's more people in an area.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization brings jobs, and is good for the economy.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization destroys valuable green space and contributes to the planet's ever growing pollution problem.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization provides more available jobs for peopleKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization reduces our wildife and nature.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not fight urbanization as it is inevitable that people are going to want to go to where there are jobs, entertainment and opportunity.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization results in resources becoming more scarceKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to have some untouched land for crops and natureKeypoint: Urbanization causes crime", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are less farms that can support a family. people who want access to things like great libraries, hospitals, theaters, need to live in a metropolis.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is destroying the countryside and the habitat of many animals.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization destroys natural habits, impacting negatively the environment and endangering many native species of animals, plants and insect life.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight urbanization because some parts of nature have been destroyed.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization causes more crime, more pollution, and destroys the environment.Keypoint: Urbanization is causing a strain on the cities' resources", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The urbanization of american is detrimental to the country because it creates large segments of society that cannot support themselves and intensifies pollution and the use of resources.Keypoint: Urbanization causes crime", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be allowed to go where they wish to live and work and inevitably they will wish to go to developed areas for greater job opportunities and amenities.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is essentially unavoidable to allow us to live in proximity to necessary services and amenities, employment and friends and familyKeypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is destroying our natural habitat by over-expanding humans reach. we need to scale back rather than continuing to destroy our environment.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Increasing urbanization can have negative impacts on the natural enviromentKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is the threat to our planet.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization leads to many new jobs and companies being able to expand their business. this means more goods produced in america and more happy people and money to be made.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanisms destroy the environment and ecosystems, we can not continue preying on our planetKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization leads to a loss of small town identities, unsightly urban skyscrapers, and a mass increase of pollution.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is leading to pollution, traffic congestion, and dense populations. this puts pressure on every infrastructure, and forces prices of everything to rise. cities have trouble meeting basic needsKeypoint: Urbanization is causing a strain on the cities' resources", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization turns the natural environment into a contrete jungle.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization destroys natural habitats for animals and plants.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanisation increases crime since there's more people in an area.Keypoint: Urbanization causes crime", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization destroys natural habitats for animals and plants.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization destroys nature and destroys the world for future generations.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight it because to many buildings and cars will be bad for the pollution. and many natural parks and countryside will be destroyed.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: As the global population continues to grow, urbanization is required to ensure that there are enough houses and employment opportunities for society to function.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization will create more job and housing opportunities for lower income people.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight urbanization because we need to conserve trees.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cities bring everything closer together and make it easier to do everything as a result of that.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight urbanization as it eats up our green spaces which we need to provide oxygen and food.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It leads to the destruction of nature and our ecosystemKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It creates congestion and pollutionKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not fight urbanization because it gives more people places to liveKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight urbanization as it is leeching talent and investment from the countryside and creating inequality.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization for people living in the country would be a good thing. it would be easier for them to have closer access to stores and other important places and this could make it happen.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization goes hand in hand with mass transit, leading to more jobs and an easier way to get to those jobs, which benefits everybody.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cities bring everything closer together and make it easier to do everything as a result of that.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization means affordable housing, access to supportive resources and community services, and better healthcare for the area.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight urbanization because it causes more air pollution than there already isKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization destroys nature and increases pollution.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is better to encourage urbanization as it damage the countryside, wildlife and open spaces lessKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization causes more crime, more pollution, and destroys the environment.Keypoint: Urbanization causes crime", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is destroying our natural habitat by over-expanding humans reach. we need to scale back rather than continuing to destroy our environment.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is not good for nature & increases pollution & climate changeKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization allows easier access to essential services such as healthcare and educationKeypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It could provide more jobs and promote growth for businesses.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A city is the best place for people to have what they need near byKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization has caused too much destruction of wildlife habitat and should be fought against. we are losing species left and right due to this.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization destroys green space, which has been shown to have a detrimental effect on human mental states.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is not good for nature & increases pollution & climate changeKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to have some untouched land for crops and natureKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should all be against urbanization. rural areas are very important to growing crops and goods from animals. these industrial buildings create a lot of pollution as well.Keypoint: Urbanization is causing a strain on the cities' resources", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight urbanization because it causes smog and air pollutionKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization will increase available housing which we need.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Its good to keep everyone in an urban environment because less travel is needed and it helps the environment.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization increases pollution and congestion in cities.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization allows for more employment opportunities, greater housing options as well as access to employment.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is a major source of pollution when you consider large cities such as london, where air quality is extremely poor and children suffer from respiratory diseases.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization helps people find better jobsKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization increases pollution and congestion in cities.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization leads to a loss of small town identities, unsightly urban skyscrapers, and a mass increase of pollution.Keypoint: Urbanization is causing a strain on the cities' resources", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is good because it means society can concentrate services - such as hospitals - in one place, thus reducing costs.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization concentrates people in one are thus increasing pollution.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Lots of trees get cut down every year to make urban cities, that's bad for the environmentKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization has caused too much destruction of wildlife habitat and should be fought against. we are losing species left and right due to this.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should stop urbanization because of the pollution and over crowding problems it causes.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Its good to keep everyone in an urban environment because less travel is needed and it helps the environment.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is much easier to provide services to an urbanised area than a populus spread out over a great distance, making planning for services much simpler and cost effective.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cities bring everything closer together and make it easier to do everything as a result of that.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization creates an area of poor quality of life, overcrowded, polluted streets, and a hub for crimeKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is leading to pollution, traffic congestion, and dense populations. this puts pressure on every infrastructure, and forces prices of everything to rise. cities have trouble meeting basic needsKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is the root cause of crime and the breakdown of inner citiesKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We cannot continue to urbanize our environment and expect the planet to cope with the ever increasing pollutionKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not fight urbanization as growth only provides more opportunities for a community.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is bad for farmers because they have less land to grow crops and is hurtful for the environmentKeypoint: Urbanization causes crime", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization destroys the countryside and with it much natural beauty.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need more housing for people and so we need to urbanize more.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization harms the environment by replacing green, natural spaces with concrete jungles.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight urbanization because simply due to increase in poverty and pollution in term of when more people more water usage, more land clearing and other waste and this cause health problemKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization destroys natural habits, impacting negatively the environment and endangering many native species of animals, plants and insect life.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization leads to more cars and more pollution. this in turn leads to ill health.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanisation leads to the loss of countrysideKeypoint: Urbanization causes crime", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We cannot continue to urbanize our environment and expect the planet to cope with the ever increasing pollutionKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization creates population centers where major companies would establish themselves which makes it easier to get jobsKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nature provides habitat to hundreds of native species. if urbanization continues, they will be at risk of extinction and once the damage has been done, it cannot be reversed.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't fight urbanization because cities are a more economical way of living. it reduces pollution by having less people driving cars and it uses less natural resources by building livings places uprightKeypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization also creates job opportunities for many people as well as housing.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is destroying natural habitats for animals leading them to decrease populations. destroying trees are harming air quality.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization helps people find better jobsKeypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should all be against urbanization. rural areas are very important to growing crops and goods from animals. these industrial buildings create a lot of pollution as well.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Concentrating large number of people and resources increases pollution and lessons the feeling of wellbeing among it's citizens.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not fight urbanization as it is inevitable that people are going to want to go to where there are jobs, entertainment and opportunity.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization packs more people into smaller spaces causing more crime, pollution and diseases.Keypoint: Urbanization is causing a strain on the cities' resources", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization turns the natural environment into a contrete jungle.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization allows easier access to essential services such as healthcare and educationKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization allows the country to save money because they can build centralized services such as hospitals and schools.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanzation result in homelessness, inner city poverty and a huge drain on limited public services , so we should move away from this to provide better opportunities in less developed areas.Keypoint: Urbanization is causing a strain on the cities' resources", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization hurts the environment & takes away from natureKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization can provide more affordable places for people to live and cut down on homelessness.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is leading to pollution, traffic congestion, and dense populations. this puts pressure on every infrastructure, and forces prices of everything to rise. cities have trouble meeting basic needsKeypoint: Urbanization causes crime", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is a grave threat to our environment and it should be stopped.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization allows people easier access to jobs, transportation and health care providers.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization destroys nature by using large amounts of the water and land available.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't fight urbanization because cities are a more economical way of living. it reduces pollution by having less people driving cars and it uses less natural resources by building livings places uprightKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urban centers are technology hubs and house millions of jobs.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is necessary for societies to grow and cilvilizations to prosper.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization can provide more affordable places for people to live and cut down on homelessness.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is key to an efficient modern community. it ensures we have access to utilities, hospitals, food shops, water and for the lowest cost per personKeypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight urbanization so that we help to preserve our natural environment.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Dense cities concentrate pollution.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Dense cities concentrate pollution.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization can cause an increase in crime rates and pollutionKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is one of the main causes of climate change and reducing its impact is importantKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization provides many opportunities for growthKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization leads to increasesd air pollution which has a significant impact on human healthKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Quick urbanization usually happens in unscrupulous ways with worker abuse and immense pollution.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization contributes to overcrowding, poverty and environmental degredation.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization leads to more pollution, illness, and poor living conditions.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is a good thing because there is more jobs availableKeypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization id needed to allow business to flourish and communities to succeed.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization leads to significant air pollution which can have serious impacts on human healthKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization makes environmental sense as concentrated resources can be be used efficiently by more people.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is the most efficient manner of structuring a community to enable access to public spaces, amenities, healthcare, public transport, schools and reduce the need for long car journeysKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Its good to keep everyone in an urban environment because less travel is needed and it helps the environment.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanisation makes all amenities closer so it's more convenient to everyone.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urban development of neighborhoods leads to more crime and violence..Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is just the natural consequence of life and there's no need to fight it. we all need homes and places to shop. it's going to happen, just embrace it.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization can bring much needed money to a city.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we fight urbanization, there would be less pollutionKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanisation makes all amenities closer so it's more convenient to everyone.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The urbanizations destroy the environmentKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to have some untouched land for crops and natureKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization allows populations easier access to food and services that improve quality of life.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization allows easier access to essential services such as healthcare and educationKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization creates spaces that are unhealthy and crime riddenKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight urbanization because it leads to more harms than good. cities have increased pollution, drug use, and crime as opposed to rural areas. there is more homeless in cities as well.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is causing more pollution and hurting the environmentKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization harms the environment by replacing green, natural spaces with concrete jungles.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization creates overcrowded places with high crimeKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A city is the best place for people to have what they need near byKeypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to have land that is not urban to support natureKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight urbanization because of the environmental impacts it has on the planet.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight urbanization because of the environmental impacts it has on the planet.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization results in overcrowding in cities. the cities become more pollute, more congested. streets are full of cars. resources suc as sewer, water and infrastructure are strained.Keypoint: Urbanization causes crime", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization allows for more investing opportunities.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanisation leads to the loss of countrysideKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is key to an efficient modern community. it ensures we have access to utilities, hospitals, food shops, water and for the lowest cost per personKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization leads to deforestation and increased levels of pollution as well as concentration of waste and garbage.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is a major source of pollution when you consider large cities such as london, where air quality is extremely poor and children suffer from respiratory diseases.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The urbanization of american is detrimental to the country because it creates large segments of society that cannot support themselves and intensifies pollution and the use of resources.Keypoint: Urbanization is causing a strain on the cities' resources", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization of areas has a positive effect on the growth and productivity of citizens. it helps society become and stay competitive in a global culture.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization helps people stay close to the stuff they need like grocery storesKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization helps to create jobs & new opportunities for peopleKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is important for the growth of economiesKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization results in overcrowding in cities. the cities become more pollute, more congested. streets are full of cars. resources suc as sewer, water and infrastructure are strained.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanisation leads to the loss of countrysideKeypoint: Urbanization is causing a strain on the cities' resources", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is just the natural consequence of life and there's no need to fight it. we all need homes and places to shop. it's going to happen, just embrace it.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight it because to many buildings and cars will be bad for the pollution. and many natural parks and countryside will be destroyed.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is the most efficient manner of structuring a community to enable access to public spaces, amenities, healthcare, public transport, schools and reduce the need for long car journeysKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight urbanization because it leads to more harms than good. cities have increased pollution, drug use, and crime as opposed to rural areas. there is more homeless in cities as well.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization will create more job and housing opportunities for lower income people.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is essentially unavoidable to allow us to live in proximity to necessary services and amenities, employment and friends and familyKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization allows for more employment opportunities, greater housing options as well as access to employment.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization means increased pollution.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization gives people more access to public transportation, employment opportunities, and health care services.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization gives people more access to public transportation, employment opportunities, and health care services.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization results in resources becoming more scarceKeypoint: Urbanization causes crime", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight urbanization since takes over lands that could be used for farms and the natural landscapes.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization hurts the environment & takes away from natureKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not fight urbanization because it gives people places to live and workKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization leaves rural communities impoverished. it should be stemmed so that rural areas continue to thrive and develop.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Lots of trees get cut down every year to make urban cities, that's bad for the environmentKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization creates an area of poor quality of life, overcrowded, polluted streets, and a hub for crimeKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization allows for more employment opportunities, greater housing options as well as access to employment.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is a good thing because there is more jobs availableKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Increasing urbanization can have negative impacts on the natural enviromentKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization from village areas brings in more workforce which could help the economyKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization can cause an increase in crime rates and pollutionKeypoint: Urbanization causes crime", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are a lot more job opportunities for people in urban centers.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization allows people access to transportation and medical services.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization will increase available housing which we need.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization destroys the enviroment, and mankind should be finding ways of utilising the space already occupied more efficiently instead.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization reduces our wildife and nature.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization and having high concentration of people in these areas will cause and increase in crime.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization allows populations easier access to food and services that improve quality of life.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization destroys the enviroment, and mankind should be finding ways of utilising the space already occupied more efficiently instead.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization leaves rural communities impoverished. it should be stemmed so that rural areas continue to thrive and develop.Keypoint: Urbanization causes crime", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization makes environmental sense as concentrated resources can be be used efficiently by more people.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization increases the growth of pollution and crimeKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is destroying natural habitats for animals leading them to decrease populations. destroying trees are harming air quality.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is something that shouldn't happen because of poverty and overcrowding.Keypoint: Urbanization is causing a strain on the cities' resources", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization should be fought as it has a negative impact on rural areas as more and more leave those areas to move to cities.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization helps poorer people in rural areas who lack the resources they need to survive. urbanization eliminates the obstacles such as transportation, medical care access.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight urbanization so that we help to preserve our natural environment.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization hurts nature which in turns harms the people and future generations.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is one of the causes of climate changeKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanisation limits what farmland is available to produce food.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization leads to more concentrated pockets of pollution.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It creates congestion and pollutionKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is good because it means society can concentrate services - such as hospitals - in one place, thus reducing costs.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization destroys nature and destroys the world for future generations.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is the root cause of crime and the breakdown of inner citiesKeypoint: Urbanization causes crime", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization leads to increasesd air pollution which has a significant impact on human healthKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Grouping people together as in urbanization, makes it easier to control crimes and puts them closer to necessary medical facilities.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is killing off nature and its habitantsKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is bad for farmers because they have less land to grow crops and is hurtful for the environmentKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization can bring much needed money to a city.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization allows the country to save money because they can build centralized services such as hospitals and schools.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The urbanizations destroy the environmentKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight urbanization because cities are a despot for waste, drugs, disease, and homelessness. the majority of hiv cases and drug addiction cases are in major cities.Keypoint: Urbanization causes crime", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we fight urbanization, then less people would be able to find jobsKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization creates more poverty and crime.Keypoint: Urbanization causes crime", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization has no regards to environmental protection and causes severe pollutionKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization can cause an increase in crime rates and pollutionKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we fight urbanization, then less people would be able to find jobsKeypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is bad because it means leads to more pollution.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization hurts nature which in turns harms the people and future generations.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Grouping people together as in urbanization, makes it easier to control crimes and puts them closer to necessary medical facilities.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization provides housing and jobs to areas that need it.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It could provide more jobs and promote growth for businesses.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization would have a very negative effect on the environment because of pollution. having clean air and water are always essential for a healthy society.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization has everything nearby some those that can't travel far will have everything they need close to themKeypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization creates overcrowding and pollutionKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is the threat to our planet.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not fight urbanization because it gives more people places to liveKeypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The urbanization of american is detrimental to the country because it creates large segments of society that cannot support themselves and intensifies pollution and the use of resources.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization can enable people to have closer access to key services such as hospitals and supermarkets.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization can create job opportunities people benefit from improved facilities such as hospitals schools shops etcKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization leads to overcrowding and scarce resourcesKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization allows people access to transportation and medical services.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization increases the growth of pollution and crimeKeypoint: Urbanization causes crime", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Concentrating large number of people and resources increases pollution and lessons the feeling of wellbeing among it's citizens.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization destroys the countryside and with it much natural beauty.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization will allow a large number of jobs to be available in one city, thus allowing people to take mass transit to work, reducing traffic and pollution.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization has everything nearby some those that can't travel far will have everything they need close to themKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization provides more available jobs for peopleKeypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization of areas has a positive effect on the growth and productivity of citizens. it helps society become and stay competitive in a global culture.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is good because it means society can concentrate services - such as hospitals - in one place, thus reducing costs.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is one of the main causes of climate change and reducing its impact is importantKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization increases the growth of pollution and crimeKeypoint: Urbanization is causing a strain on the cities' resources", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization should be banned to save on forest destruction, animal extinction, and overall save the environment.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is better to encourage urbanization as it damage the countryside, wildlife and open spaces lessKeypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization contributes to pollution and overcrowding which also causes rents to rise that can displace a family that is already struggling to meet its needs.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should encourage urbanization because people have to close access to food, jobs and medical care will decrease their need to own cars to travel long distances.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is better to encourage urbanization as it damage the countryside, wildlife and open spaces lessKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should encourage urbanization because people have to close access to food, jobs and medical care will decrease their need to own cars to travel long distances.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not fight urbanization as it is inevitable that people are going to want to go to where there are jobs, entertainment and opportunity.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization leads to deforestation and increased levels of pollution as well as concentration of waste and garbage.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It leads to the destruction of nature and our ecosystemKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are less farms that can support a family. people who want access to things like great libraries, hospitals, theaters, need to live in a metropolis.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight urbanization because it leads to more harms than good. cities have increased pollution, drug use, and crime as opposed to rural areas. there is more homeless in cities as well.Keypoint: Urbanization causes crime", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization can increase over crowding which in turn can lead to a rise in crime.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization destroys green space, which has been shown to have a detrimental effect on human mental states.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight urbanization because it causes more air pollution than there already isKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to continue to fight urbanization because the cities are getting way too over populated in which the government can not fully support efficiently.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization allows people easier access to jobs, transportation and health care providers.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization should be banned to save on forest destruction, animal extinction, and overall save the environment.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight urbanization because it leads to air pollutionKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization leads to more pollution, illness, and poor living conditions.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urban centers are technology hubs and house millions of jobs.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization increases the growth of pollution and crimeKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization and having high concentration of people in these areas will cause and increase in crime.Keypoint: Urbanization causes crime", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization packs more people into smaller spaces causing more crime, pollution and diseases.Keypoint: Urbanization causes crime", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need more housing for people and so we need to urbanize more.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization leads to significant air pollution which can have serious impacts on human healthKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization provides more economic opportunities in areas that desperately need them.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization can cause pollution and other environmental issuesKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization can bring much needed money to a city.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization for people living in the country would be a good thing. it would be easier for them to have closer access to stores and other important places and this could make it happen.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight urbanization because more populous areas also see an increase in crime.Keypoint: Urbanization causes crime", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: As the global population continues to grow, urbanization is required to ensure that there are enough houses and employment opportunities for society to function.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization provides many opportunities for growthKeypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Too much urbanization means less green space for people to enjoy and disturbs nature that resides there.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is killing off habitats and therefore, animals overallKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization will create more job and housing opportunities for lower income people.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is important for the growth of economiesKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The urbanization of american is detrimental to the country because it creates large segments of society that cannot support themselves and intensifies pollution and the use of resources.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization would have a very negative effect on the environment because of pollution. having clean air and water are always essential for a healthy society.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is killing off habitats and therefore, animals overallKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization creates overcrowded places with high crimeKeypoint: Urbanization causes crime", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization goes hand in hand with mass transit, leading to more jobs and an easier way to get to those jobs, which benefits everybody.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization allows for more investing opportunities.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbaniz. ation is critical to handle growing populations.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization can provide more affordable places for people to live and cut down on homelessness.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is inevitable in the current environment, as most of the jobs and opportunities are in the big cities - we should focus on making the best of it rather than stopping it entirely.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urban development of neighborhoods leads to more crime and violence..Keypoint: Urbanization causes crime", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization can cause pollution and other environmental issuesKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should support keeping land untouched and able to grow cropsKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It could provide more jobs and promote growth for businesses.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanisation limits what farmland is available to produce food.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight urbanization as it is leeching talent and investment from the countryside and creating inequality.Keypoint: Urbanization causes crime", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization results in resources becoming more scarceKeypoint: Urbanization is causing a strain on the cities' resources", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization means affordable housing, access to supportive resources and community services, and better healthcare for the area.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization gives people more access to public transportation, employment opportunities, and health care services.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization from village areas brings in more workforce which could help the economyKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization leads to many new jobs and companies being able to expand their business. this means more goods produced in america and more happy people and money to be made.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not fight urbanization because it creates more jobs, more jobs more incomesKeypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization destroys nature by using large amounts of the water and land available.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is inevitable in the current environment, as most of the jobs and opportunities are in the big cities - we should focus on making the best of it rather than stopping it entirely.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization destroys the natural beauty of the area and should be fought againstKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization will allow a large number of jobs to be available in one city, thus allowing people to take mass transit to work, reducing traffic and pollution.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization means increased pollution.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization contributes to overcrowding, poverty and environmental degredation.Keypoint: Urbanization causes crime", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not fight urbanization because it gives more people places to liveKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization also creates job opportunities for many people as well as housing.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanisation makes all amenities closer so it's more convenient to everyone.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization concentrates people in one are thus increasing pollution.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization provides more available jobs for peopleKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization will allow a large number of jobs to be available in one city, thus allowing people to take mass transit to work, reducing traffic and pollution.Keypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanisms destroy the environment and ecosystems, we can not continue preying on our planetKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is one of the causes of climate changeKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization packs more people into smaller spaces causing more crime, pollution and diseases.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight urbanization since takes over lands that could be used for farms and the natural landscapes.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization creates overcrowding and pollutionKeypoint: Urbanization causes crime", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is bad for farmers because they have less land to grow crops and is hurtful for the environmentKeypoint: Urbanization is causing a strain on the cities' resources", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization creates more poverty and crime.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should support keeping land untouched and able to grow cropsKeypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is a necessary part of economic expansion and improvement.Keypoint: Urbanization benefits the environment", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization provides many opportunities for growthKeypoint: Urbanization benefits the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should fight urbanization because cities are a despot for waste, drugs, disease, and homelessness. the majority of hiv cases and drug addiction cases are in major cities.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is important for the growth of economiesKeypoint: Cities offer more opportunities", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many of our natural habitats and ecosystems have been lost to urbanization, thereby rendering some many species of animals endangeredKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization ruins the environment and pushes out existing animal species from their homes.Keypoint: Urbanization harms the environment", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization causes more crime, more pollution, and destroys the environment.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we fight urbanization, there would be less pollutionKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization is causing more pollution and hurting the environmentKeypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization leads to the destruction of many animals and plants.Keypoint: Restrictions on migration would benefit people in the rural areas economically/socially", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Urbanization leads to overcrowding and scarce resourcesKeypoint: Urbanization is causing a strain on the cities' resources", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - } - ] -} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/tasks/task1299_kpa_keypoint_matching_compulsory_voting.json b/tasks/task1299_kpa_keypoint_matching_compulsory_voting.json deleted file mode 100644 index 19fcdf9b5..000000000 --- a/tasks/task1299_kpa_keypoint_matching_compulsory_voting.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,3094 +0,0 @@ -{ - "Contributors": [ - "Arjun Ashok" - ], - "Source": [ - "ArgKP (https://github.com/IBM/KPA_2021_shared_task)" - ], - "Definition": "The input contains an argument and a keypoint on the topic \"We should introduce compulsory voting\", separated by \"\".Your task is to answer if the keypoint matches the argument and summarizes exactly what the argument means, in the context of this topic.", - "Categories": [ - "Classification -> Verification -> Summary Verification", - "Text Comparison" - ], - "Domains": [ - "Reviews", - "Law", - "Government and Politics", - "Dialogue" - ], - "Input_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Output_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Instruction_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Positive Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Some people would not have the transport or the monetary funds to be able to get to a voting booth to place their vote. this would lead to economic hardship.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that some people would not have the transport or the monetary funds to be able to get to a voting booth to place their vote. this would lead to economic hardship." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would give a accurate figure of how people voteKeypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that compulsory voting would give a accurate figure of how people vote" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: You can't force someone to vote,what if they don't like either party, not voting is them expressing this.Keypoint: Not everyone has the ability to go to vote", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that you can't force someone to vote,what if they don't like either party, not voting is them expressing this." - } - ], - "Negative Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would insure that every eligible voting citizen is able to aid in who they want for political offices.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that compulsory voting would insure that every eligible voting citizen is able to aid in who they want for political offices." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A system of compulsory voting would mean that politicians would have to consider the needs of the whole electorate rather than just those who turn out to voteKeypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that a system of compulsory voting would mean that politicians would have to consider the needs of the whole electorate rather than just those who turn out to vote" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is not democratic to force voting. people should have the right to decide if they want to vote.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that it is not democratic to force voting. people should have the right to decide if they want to vote." - } - ], - "Instances": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Voting is a right, not a law. no one should be forced to vote if they don't want toKeypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: With voter turnout at an all-time low in many areas, voting should be made mandatory.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A high turnout is important for a proper democratic mandate and the functioning of democracyKeypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is the duty of eveyone to be aware of the political situation and have your say for your benefitKeypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is important that every voice is heard when it comes to elections. otherwise we cannot be sure the government really represents the people.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A well informed population is always better for the voting process and democracy. forcing populations to vote undermines the well of free people and should not be adopted.Keypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting will force citizens to vote even if they do not understand the system and therefore give a false election result.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: With lower than ever voter turn outs, voting should be made mandatory so that democratic voting can be shared by all.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting will improve voter turn out and ensure that everyone is fairly represented.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Freedom of choice, democracy supporting free will and having a penalties if somebody not attended voting is beyond the line.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would cause people with little to no information to cast votes based on things as silly as names while knowing nothing of the candidates stance on anythingKeypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A system of compulsory voting would mean that politicians would have to consider the needs of the whole electorate rather than just those who turn out to voteKeypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should introduce compulsory voting since everyone should vote and what better way to encourage voting than by making mandatory.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Voting is a responsibility and should be mandatory.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting forces the citizen to pay attention the policies that affect them and decide accordingly instead of allowing only certain groups to control policy.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting is in complete violation of the democratic process, which is freedom of action and expression - forcing anything on a person is wrong.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting could improve peoples knowledge of politics if they knew they had to vote they might learn more about politicsKeypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would make it certain that everyone would vote in every election.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting makes the population more involved in the election process, and would give results that more accurately reflected the will of the electors.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting can help encourage better results during electionsKeypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting forces low information voters into the system that may only vote for candidates that promise free services.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should not be forced to vote if they don't feel compelled to vote for a candidate or issue..Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .Keypoint: Not everyone has the ability to go to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting will insure that everyone has a vote and a say.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: In countries like australia, compulsory voting has increased voter participation.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not introduce compulsory voting because this is a free country, if you don't want to vote, that is your right not to.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People have the right to abstain from voting, especially among the disabledKeypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Forcing people to vote would lead to people just picking a candidate because they have to, not because they believe them to be a better optionKeypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would ensure greater political activism among the publicKeypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: With voter turnout at an all-time low in many areas, voting should be made mandatory.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People have a right to vote and they also have a right not to vote if they don't like any of the candidatesKeypoint: Not everyone has the ability to go to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People being forced to vote when they don't wish to will distort the results with unresearched and made-up candidates that they begrudgingly vote for.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If it against their will people will choose randomly and it will negate the choices of othersKeypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Everyone has a right to vote and to not vote if they don't want to. if someone doesn't think any of the candidates are capable then they shouldn't be forced to put them in office.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Voting is a right, not a law. no one should be forced to vote if they don't want toKeypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need more people to speak in electionsKeypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting gives everyone a say in their electionsKeypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Would increase voter turnout. guarantees that everyone has a say.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting is not an answer, because those people who do not care or know exactly what they are voting for may just vote for random things even though they may ultimately oppose what they are voting for.Keypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Forcing people to vote would lead to people just picking a candidate because they have to, not because they believe them to be a better optionKeypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Elections are supposed to be won by the opinion of the people. if only a select few people vote, then the result only reflects their opinions, not that of the whole population.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vote is the basis of democracy and must be mandatoryKeypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If someone has no choice it is wrong to insist that they chooseKeypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We must ensure everyone's voice is heard by introducing compulsory voting.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would cause people with little to no information to cast votes based on things as silly as names while knowing nothing of the candidates stance on anythingKeypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should do because then it will be more fair when the results come in because everyone has had their say.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Would increase voter turnout. guarantees that everyone has a say.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would make the election practice fairer.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would be beneficial because more people would take an interest in politics, creating a more fair representation in government.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not introduce compulsory voting as some people's vote is choosing not to vote and they should be allowed to behave as they wish.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Voting and not voting is an exercise of freedom of expression and speech, therefore protected. creating laws forcing voting violates the rights of individuals.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should not be forced to vote if they dont want to, its an abuse of powerKeypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A well informed population is always better for the voting process and democracy. forcing populations to vote undermines the well of free people and should not be adopted.Keypoint: Not everyone has the ability to go to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Making voting compulsory goes fundamentally against democratic government. a choice not to vote is as valid a choice as voting for a party.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some people would not have the transport or the monetary funds to be able to get to a voting booth to place their vote. this would lead to economic hardship.Keypoint: Not everyone has the ability to go to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should introduce compulsory voting since everyone should vote and what better way to encourage voting than by making mandatory.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting infringes on peoples rights.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Turn out figures are unacceptably low, we need to motivate people to be active voters for a representative democracyKeypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: You cannot enforce such a requirement. some people just don't care about politics and you can't force them to do so.Keypoint: Not everyone has the ability to go to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting greatly increases voter turnoutKeypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: With lower than ever voter turn outs, voting should be made mandatory so that democratic voting can be shared by all.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should introduce compulsory voting because it helps make sure everyone gives their input in electionsKeypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not introduce compulsory voting because that would allow those that have no clue to vote for the least favorable candidates.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to introduce compulsory voting as everyone should vote so that we have a better balance and a more accurate outcome.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would make it certain that everyone would vote in every election.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting improves voting turnaround.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would saturate the polls with new faces, causing more change and better results.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By requiring all citizens to vote, we would be able to elect politicians who more accurately represent the public's will.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Too many people do not take responsibility for their part in democracyKeypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Voting is such an important part of being part of society and its decision making process that it should be compulsory.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is important that every voice is heard when it comes to elections. otherwise we cannot be sure the government really represents the people.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It can be viewed as undemocratic to force people to have to vote.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would mean our electorate would more represent our vales.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It should be everyone's responsibility to vote so there is a fair representation at the polling station rather than just a small percentage deciding the fate of everyone.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should introduce compulsory voting because it helps make sure everyone gives their input in electionsKeypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Voter turnout these days are dropping steadily so we need to make everyone vote to show the true representation of the peopleKeypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting takes into account the voice of all people. it's then compulsory everybody votesKeypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would make the opinions of everyone's opinions be taken into account.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would give a accurate figure of how people voteKeypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting won't make more people vote. people restraining to vote is already a choice they made not to vote for any of the candidateKeypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Voting should not be enforced as some candidates and prospective legislation may not be aligned to a voters views and would infringe on the views and rights of citizens.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The right for every citizen to vote was a hard battle and now they have that right they should use it.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting will insure that everyone has a vote and a say.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting ensures everyone's vote will be countedKeypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting will increase peoples awareness of political issuesKeypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People have the right to abstain from voting, especially among the disabledKeypoint: Not everyone has the ability to go to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Everyone should be required to vote to make sure that people who are elected are chosen by the majority.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not introduce compulsory voting as some people's vote is choosing not to vote and they should be allowed to behave as they wish.Keypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would mean our electorate would more represent our vales.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting ensures everyone's vote will be countedKeypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If people are forced to vote we will get a larger representation of the populationKeypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People have a right to vote and they also have a right not to vote if they don't like any of the candidatesKeypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should not be forced to vote any more than they should be forced to have insurance or be fined for the lack of.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not force people to vote. they may not be informed and just randomly mark the ballot.Keypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting puts a strain on the freedom of individualsKeypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would insure everyone has a say in voting as well as be a way to aid in eliminating electoral voting as compulsory would be a more accurate voting system for the people's voice.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be free to vote or not to voteKeypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Far too few people actually vote, meaning that those in government are not truly representative of the people.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It should be an individual choice who to vote for, or indeed if to vote at all. the state has no role to coerce anyone into participating in elections if they do not want to.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting will increase peoples awareness of political issuesKeypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Voting should be a choice for every personKeypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Voting is a right, but we should also have a right not to vote. if no party truly reflects are views we should not be forced to vote for just the least bad optionKeypoint: Not everyone has the ability to go to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would make the election practice fairer.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Voting is a responsibility and should be mandatory.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: While election participation may be declining, it is a person's choice whether they choose to take part in the voting process and this choice should not be removedKeypoint: Not everyone has the ability to go to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Choosing to abstain from voting is a vote in itself. refusing to support either candidate is a valid choice, and should be honored.Keypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We were given the right to vote but not an order to vote which means that it is a choice and should remain so.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Not everyone has the transportation, ability to take off work, etc that would allow them to go vote.Keypoint: Not everyone has the ability to go to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People have self ownership and can choose to not voteKeypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should introduce compulsory voting because every people in a certain country should vote because they are a citizen of that country and still needed to be countedKeypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Forcing people to vote or face a penalty is what a dictatorship sounds like. compulsory voting is a bad idea. i don't believe it would change the results anyways.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Everyone should vote, and the only way to ensure that happens is by instituting compulsory voting.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A well informed population is always better for the voting process and democracy. forcing populations to vote undermines the well of free people and should not be adopted.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Not everyone has the transportation, ability to take off work, etc that would allow them to go vote.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is no way a person should be forced to vote in a compulsory voting ruling as not everyone stays versed in the political world which would end up with people just guessing the the best person may loose.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: No one should be forced to vote. it goes against the principles of our nation and its freedoms. it is a right, but that doesn't mean anyone has to do it.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We were given the right to vote but not an order to vote which means that it is a choice and should remain so.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting makes for more informed votersKeypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We live in a democratic society and people should not be forced to vote if they dont want toKeypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting could lead to an uninformed public electing unqualified people to officeKeypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not introduce compulsory voting because people of no education or hardly any will vote and they have no idea who or what they are voting forKeypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: In a democracy people have a right to choose not to voteKeypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should introduce compulsory voting because it helps make sure everyone gives their input in electionsKeypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting should be introduced because it actually increases voter turnout.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Elected officials are currently chosen by about 20% of the population and thus do not represent everyoneKeypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: I think we should introduce compulsory voting. voting is a massive change in the future for all of us and each of us have a duty to cast our vote. there is way too much voter suppression and apathy.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Choosing to abstain from voting is a vote in itself. refusing to support either candidate is a valid choice, and should be honored.Keypoint: Not everyone has the ability to go to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: In a democracy, one should be allowed to choose for themselves whether or not they would like to vote.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting is against our right to freedom.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The number of people participating in voting across all elections has been steadily declining year on year so we need compulsory voting to ensure representative electionsKeypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should introduce compulsory voting because democracy loses out when people get turned off politics and don't get involvedKeypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting will lead to a far more representative system of parliament because everyone's vote will be taken into consideration.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We live in a democratic society and people should not be forced to vote if they dont want toKeypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Not everyone has a strong opinion on every topic. those who choose not to participate should have the freedom not to.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should introduce compulsory voting as all citizens need to have their voices heard to make the outcomes of elections more credible and truly representative of the whole population.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People who dont want to vote should not be forced to do so.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This would ensure that everyone's opinion is being represented and that everyone will have to think and take part in politics and how it affects them.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should introduce compulsory voting as all citizens need to have their voices heard to make the outcomes of elections more credible and truly representative of the whole population.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would make the vote mean even less since so many people would be voting out of requirement than any real desire or knowledgeKeypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People have the right to abstain from voting, especially among the disabledKeypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting shouldn't be introduced because it violates freedom of choice.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By requiring all citizens to vote, we would be able to elect politicians who more accurately represent the public's will.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Forcing everyone to vote will cause voter apathy which makes useless or ill informed votesKeypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: With voter turnout at an all-time low in many areas, voting should be made mandatory.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting educates the population.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: In countries like australia, compulsory voting has increased voter participation.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The number of people participating in voting across all elections has been steadily declining year on year so we need compulsory voting to ensure representative electionsKeypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting could improve peoples knowledge of politics if they knew they had to vote they might learn more about politicsKeypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Too many people do not take responsibility for their part in democracyKeypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be free to vote or not vote.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If everyone votes, the results actually reflect what people want.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting forces low information voters into the system that may only vote for candidates that promise free services.Keypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It can be viewed as undemocratic to force people to have to vote.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is a person's right to choose whether or not to vote. some people do not care about politics.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Forcing people to vote wouldn't make much difference, they could just chose anyone instead of who is best for the jobKeypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: All votes should be heard and must be obligatory for all adults and not voting must include some penalties.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: More votes would be cast if there was compulsory votingKeypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is the right of an individual on whether they want to act on their right to vote, or not.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Elections are supposed to be won by the opinion of the people. if only a select few people vote, then the result only reflects their opinions, not that of the whole population.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is not democratic to force voting. people should have the right to decide if they want to vote.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The whole point of democracy is to give people the choice who or who not to vote forKeypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting will increase the number of voter turnout.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People have the right to vote. they shouldnt be forced to if they arent interestedKeypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting takes away people's freedom to choose whether or not they want to vote.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting violates our rights.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Forcing people to vote reluctantly could make them vote for any random person.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The country is run by people who are selected by voters. all people have a stake in the government so all should be required to vote and show their opinions.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .Keypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting forces the citizen to pay attention the policies that affect them and decide accordingly instead of allowing only certain groups to control policy.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting forces people to engage with democracyKeypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting should be introduced because it actually increases voter turnout.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People who have no clue about the issues and people who are not into politics would be voting for someone they know nothing about.Keypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting is against our right to freedom.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting will force citizens to vote even if they do not understand the system and therefore give a false election result.Keypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would give a accurate figure of how people voteKeypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting ensures everyone's vote will be countedKeypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A well informed population is always better for the voting process and democracy. forcing populations to vote undermines the well of free people and should not be adopted.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Everyone should have the option of not engaging with the voting process if that is their choice.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would make the opinions of everyone's opinions be taken into account.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Freedom of choice, democracy supporting free will and having a penalties if somebody not attended voting is beyond the line.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Participation is necessary for a functional democracy.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This would ensure that everyone's opinion is being represented and that everyone will have to think and take part in politics and how it affects them.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would see to it that we have the person the people, all the people, truly want in each area of our government.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Elections are supposed to be won by the opinion of the people. if only a select few people vote, then the result only reflects their opinions, not that of the whole population.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Voting and not voting is an exercise of freedom of expression and speech, therefore protected. creating laws forcing voting violates the rights of individuals.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Voting is a privilege, but not something that should be forced. if someone doesn't like either candidate why should they be forced to choose?Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The only way to have a true democracy is if every voice is heard.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A high turnout is important for a proper democratic mandate and the functioning of democracyKeypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is the right of an individual on whether they want to act on their right to vote, or not.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Everyone has a say at who is voted in and who is voted out.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: You cannot enforce such a requirement. some people just don't care about politics and you can't force them to do so.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not introduce compulsory voting as some people's vote is choosing not to vote and they should be allowed to behave as they wish.Keypoint: Not everyone has the ability to go to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The right to vote is a democratic right, it is not however democratic to force people to vote, people can abstain if they wishKeypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: American citizens have the right to choose whether or not they want to vote.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: More votes would be cast if there was compulsory votingKeypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would be an effective antidote to voter suppression. more voter participation makes for a healthier democracy.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should introduce compulsory voting as all citizens need to have their voices heard to make the outcomes of elections more credible and truly representative of the whole population.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting is a violation of civil rightsKeypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Everyone should be required to vote to make sure that people who are elected are chosen by the majority.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some people choose not to vote for ethical reasons.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting shouldn't be introduced because it violates freedom of choice.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would ensure that the person or party elected is the one that geniunely has the most support of the entire electorate.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Ensuring everyone has a voice in our elections is critical to a functioning democracyKeypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Free speech is an unalienable right. no one should be compelled to be forced to voteKeypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should not be forced to vote if they dont want to, its an abuse of powerKeypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting is a violation of one's free will and government should not infringe on a persons free will choice.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Where compulsory voting exists, in countries like australia, participation rates are the highest in the world. this inevitably leads to more truly representative democracy.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This would help get many more people to the polls to voteKeypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People who dont want to vote should not be forced to do so.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It should be introduced as many people do not vote which reduces the turnoutKeypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting can help encourage better results during electionsKeypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting takes into account the voice of all people. it's then compulsory everybody votesKeypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is a person's right to choose whether or not to vote. some people do not care about politics.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting improves voting turnaround.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A low turn out means that the elected government does not represent the true wishes of the country. making voting compulsory would mean that an elected government had a true mandate.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting won't make more people vote. people restraining to vote is already a choice they made not to vote for any of the candidateKeypoint: Not everyone has the ability to go to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not force people to vote. they may not be informed and just randomly mark the ballot.Keypoint: Not everyone has the ability to go to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting will lead to a far more representative system of parliament because everyone's vote will be taken into consideration.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If people are forced to vote we will get a larger representation of the populationKeypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Everyone should have the option of not engaging with the voting process if that is their choice.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This would help get many more people to the polls to voteKeypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Being forced to do anything inhibits freedom.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would mean the government more truly reflects the thoughts of the people.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting infringes on our freedom.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should introduce compulsory voting because every people in a certain country should vote because they are a citizen of that country and still needed to be countedKeypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting will increase peoples awareness of political issuesKeypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting ensures that our leaders reflect the will of all people, not just those who were able/motivated enough to make it to the polls.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It should be the right of the individual whether to vote or not to vote.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Far too few people actually vote, meaning that those in government are not truly representative of the people.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting means that politicians have to address the concerns of the whole electorate rather than just focusing on those groups of people who usually turn out to voteKeypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It's important that everyone have a say by voting. if everyone had to vote we would have a fair view of what everyone thought about who should be elected, not just those who could be bothered to turn up.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If everyone votes, the results actually reflect what people want.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If someone has no choice it is wrong to insist that they chooseKeypoint: Not everyone has the ability to go to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Voting is an important part of making democracy work, and should be mandatory.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting is unconstitutional, and forcing people to do something they do not want to do never turns out as planned.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting does not promote democratic engagement instead in turns voting in to a tick box excerciseKeypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting should be introduced to ensure that the results of elections are completely representative of the population.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not introduce compulsory voting because we could end up with a lot of illiterate people votingKeypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting could improve peoples knowledge of politics if they knew they had to vote they might learn more about politicsKeypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Making voting compulsory goes fundamentally against democratic government. a choice not to vote is as valid a choice as voting for a party.Keypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting will increase the number of voter turnout.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would ensure that the person or party elected is the one that geniunely has the most support of the entire electorate.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Voting is such an important part of being part of society and its decision making process that it should be compulsory.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Voting should not be enforced as some candidates and prospective legislation may not be aligned to a voters views and would infringe on the views and rights of citizens.Keypoint: Not everyone has the ability to go to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is as much a persons right to choose not to vote for a person as it is to vote for them.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to introduce compulsory voting as everyone should vote so that we have a better balance and a more accurate outcome.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nobody should have to cast a vote if they don't want to, and compulsory voting can be very inconvenient for those who can't get to a polling place for whatever reason.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be allowed to not vote as a way to protest the governmentKeypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is the right of the individual whether they vote, as much as who they vote for. not voting is a choice, a protected right in a free country and can't be trampled on.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting is an infringement on personal choiceKeypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Forcing a person to vote when they know nothing of current issues could lead to them voting for someone that will cause more harm than good.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting ensures that our leaders reflect the will of all people, not just those who were able/motivated enough to make it to the polls.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not introduce compulsory voting as it violates the rights of freedom.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This country believes in free will. no person should be forced to vote. even by not voting a person is making a statement about their opinion of the country.Keypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would insure everyone has a say in voting as well as be a way to aid in eliminating electoral voting as compulsory would be a more accurate voting system for the people's voice.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting won't make more people vote. people restraining to vote is already a choice they made not to vote for any of the candidateKeypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The whole point of democracy is to give people the choice who or who not to vote forKeypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting will improve voter turn out and ensure that everyone is fairly represented.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting takes into account the voice of all people. it's then compulsory everybody votesKeypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be free to vote or not vote.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would be an effective antidote to voter suppression. more voter participation makes for a healthier democracy.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: While election participation may be declining, it is a person's choice whether they choose to take part in the voting process and this choice should not be removedKeypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting gives everyone in society their say in politicsKeypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting gives everyone in society their say in politicsKeypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting should be introduced to ensure that the results of elections are completely representative of the population.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting will lead to a far more representative system of parliament because everyone's vote will be taken into consideration.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This country believes in free will. no person should be forced to vote. even by not voting a person is making a statement about their opinion of the country.Keypoint: Not everyone has the ability to go to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: While election participation may be declining, it is a person's choice whether they choose to take part in the voting process and this choice should not be removedKeypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would make the election practice fairer.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some people cannot afford to vote, for example if they live to far away from the voting office.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Where compulsory voting exists, in countries like australia, participation rates are the highest in the world. this inevitably leads to more truly representative democracy.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vote is the basis of democracy and must be mandatoryKeypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is as much a persons right to choose not to vote for a person as it is to vote for them.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Part of living in a free nation is having the freedom not to particpate in the election processKeypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People have the right to not vote, if they so chooseKeypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Voting is a right, a privilege but a person should not be forced to vote, especially if there is not a candidate that a person agrees with in regards to their views.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If everyone voted there would be a fairer and more accurate representation of leaders and government and requiring voting is the only way to achieve this.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is the duty of eveyone to be aware of the political situation and have your say for your benefitKeypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting will cause more people to take an interest in politics which, in turn, will benefit everyoneKeypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting is an infringement on personal choiceKeypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should not be forced to vote if they don't feel compelled to vote for a candidate or issue..Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is the right of the individual whether they vote, as much as who they vote for. not voting is a choice, a protected right in a free country and can't be trampled on.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Voting is an important part of making democracy work, and should be mandatory.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't introduce compulsory voting because it isnt fair to force people to vote if they don't want. a vote essentially supports a politician's future actions. some people may not like either candidateKeypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Ensuring everyone has a voice in our elections is critical to a functioning democracyKeypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not introduce compulsory voting as it violates the rights of freedom.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting greatly increases voter turnoutKeypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would ensure greater political activism among the publicKeypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People who have no clue about the issues and people who are not into politics would be voting for someone they know nothing about.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: You can't force someone to vote,what if they don't like either party, not voting is them expressing this.Keypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting will increase the number of voter turnout.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would mean the government more truly reflects the thoughts of the people.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting infringes on people's rights to not vote as a protest against plethora of things, such as the voting system as it is, corruption in government, etc.Keypoint: Not everyone has the ability to go to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not introduce compulsory voting because we could end up with a lot of illiterate people votingKeypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The number of people participating in voting across all elections has been steadily declining year on year so we need compulsory voting to ensure representative electionsKeypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: I think we should introduce compulsory voting. voting is a massive change in the future for all of us and each of us have a duty to cast our vote. there is way too much voter suppression and apathy.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting will improve voter turn out and ensure that everyone is fairly represented.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldnt because people might just vote for anyone if they have no interest in politics and could sway the vote.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting should be introduced to ensure that the results of elections are completely representative of the population.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Every individual should be able to choose whether or not they want to voteKeypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would get everyone a voice in the electionKeypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would make it certain that everyone would vote in every election.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some people choose not to vote for ethical reasons.Keypoint: Not everyone has the ability to go to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not force people to vote. they may not be informed and just randomly mark the ballot.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't introduce compulsory voting because it isnt fair to force people to vote if they don't want. a vote essentially supports a politician's future actions. some people may not like either candidateKeypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Voting is a matter of choice and should not be forced.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Voting is a right, a privilege but a person should not be forced to vote, especially if there is not a candidate that a person agrees with in regards to their views.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People have the right to vote. they shouldnt be forced to if they arent interestedKeypoint: Not everyone has the ability to go to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some people don't care about voting and if required would just pick random choices, which could have disastrous consequences.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some people cannot afford to vote, for example if they live to far away from the voting office.Keypoint: Not everyone has the ability to go to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: No one should be forced to do anything in our country.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be allowed to not vote as a way to protest the governmentKeypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some may not like the choice of canidates so they should not have to vote.Keypoint: Not everyone has the ability to go to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting is in complete violation of the democratic process, which is freedom of action and expression - forcing anything on a person is wrong.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting infringes on people's rights to not vote as a protest against plethora of things, such as the voting system as it is, corruption in government, etc.Keypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Everyone has a say at who is voted in and who is voted out.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would force those who do not agree with candidates to vote for someone they are not confident in.Keypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Forcing people to vote reluctantly could make them vote for any random person.Keypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Elections are part of a democratic process, and freedom of expression is a cornerstone of this - making voting compulsory is a denial of the very liberty voting is meant to symbolise.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A system of compulsory voting would mean that politicians would have to consider the needs of the whole electorate rather than just those who turn out to voteKeypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Voter turnout these days are dropping steadily so we need to make everyone vote to show the true representation of the peopleKeypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some people choose not to vote for ethical reasons.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting makes for more informed votersKeypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting means that politicians have to address the concerns of the whole electorate rather than just focusing on those groups of people who usually turn out to voteKeypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: In a democracy, one should be allowed to choose for themselves whether or not they would like to vote.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting is not an answer, because those people who do not care or know exactly what they are voting for may just vote for random things even though they may ultimately oppose what they are voting for.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting will cause more people to take an interest in politics which, in turn, will benefit everyoneKeypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Choosing to abstain from voting is a vote in itself. refusing to support either candidate is a valid choice, and should be honored.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would make the vote mean even less since so many people would be voting out of requirement than any real desire or knowledgeKeypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By requiring all citizens to vote, we would be able to elect politicians who more accurately represent the public's will.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting is inconvenient, especially to those with mobility issues or just cannot take time off work to vote.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting ensures that our leaders reflect the will of all people, not just those who were able/motivated enough to make it to the polls.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: You cannot enforce such a requirement. some people just don't care about politics and you can't force them to do so.Keypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People have a right to vote and they also have a right not to vote if they don't like any of the candidatesKeypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be given a choice whether they would like to vote or not, it would be undemocratic to not give the people a choice.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If everyone votes, the results actually reflect what people want.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Voting is a privilege, but not something that should be forced. if someone doesn't like either candidate why should they be forced to choose?Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not introduce compulsory voting because people of no education or hardly any will vote and they have no idea who or what they are voting forKeypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Every individual should be able to choose whether or not they want to voteKeypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting will cause more people to take an interest in politics which, in turn, will benefit everyoneKeypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some people choose not to vote for ethical reasons.Keypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would make the opinions of everyone's opinions be taken into account.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting is against freedom, everyone has the right to choose whether or not they want to vote in a free & open societyKeypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would get everyone a voice in the electionKeypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should introduce compulsory voting because each citizen has a right to voice their opinion on who is leading this country.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: All votes should be heard and must be obligatory for all adults and not voting must include some penalties.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting is inconvenient, especially to those with mobility issues or just cannot take time off work to vote.Keypoint: Not everyone has the ability to go to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Each person has the right to decide if they want to vote or not. forcing people to do something is the exact opposite of what this country is supposed to be about.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: All votes should be heard and must be obligatory for all adults and not voting must include some penalties.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would mean that every voice is heard and every one is counted.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The right for every citizen to vote was a hard battle and now they have that right they should use it.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Forcing a person to vote when they know nothing of current issues could lead to them voting for someone that will cause more harm than good.Keypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting puts a strain on the freedom of individualsKeypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If people are forced to vote we will get a larger representation of the populationKeypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is a violation of a person's rights to force them to vote in an election if they do not wish to do so.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting is a violation of civil rightsKeypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting educates the population.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Voting is such an important part of being part of society and its decision making process that it should be compulsory.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting does not promote democratic engagement instead in turns voting in to a tick box excerciseKeypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would see to it that we have the person the people, all the people, truly want in each area of our government.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be given a choice whether they would like to vote or not, it would be undemocratic to not give the people a choice.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Far too few people actually vote, meaning that those in government are not truly representative of the people.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People have self ownership and can choose to not voteKeypoint: Not everyone has the ability to go to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need more people to speak in electionsKeypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting makes the population more involved in the election process, and would give results that more accurately reflected the will of the electors.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Not everyone has a strong opinion on every topic. those who choose not to participate should have the freedom not to.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting could lead to an uninformed public electing unqualified people to officeKeypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Elected officials are currently chosen by about 20% of the population and thus do not represent everyoneKeypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We must ensure everyone's voice is heard by introducing compulsory voting.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting can help encourage better results during electionsKeypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting will insure that everyone has a vote and a say.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting violates our rights.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not introduce compulsory voting because that would allow those that have no clue to vote for the least favorable candidates.Keypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Voting is a right, but we should also have a right not to vote. if no party truly reflects are views we should not be forced to vote for just the least bad optionKeypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People have the right to abstain from voting, especially among the disabledKeypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would mean that every voice is heard and every one is counted.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting takes away people's freedom to choose whether or not they want to vote.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The right for every citizen to vote was a hard battle and now they have that right they should use it.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting infringes on people's rights to not vote as a protest against plethora of things, such as the voting system as it is, corruption in government, etc.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: I think we should introduce compulsory voting. voting is a massive change in the future for all of us and each of us have a duty to cast our vote. there is way too much voter suppression and apathy.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would saturate the polls with new faces, causing more change and better results.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A high turnout is important for a proper democratic mandate and the functioning of democracyKeypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not introduce compulsory voting because this is a free country, if you don't want to vote, that is your right not to.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting goes against people's liberties and freedoms.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Voting is a right, but we should also have a right not to vote. if no party truly reflects are views we should not be forced to vote for just the least bad optionKeypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Each person has the right to decide if they want to vote or not. forcing people to do something is the exact opposite of what this country is supposed to be about.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would only cause uneducated votes to be cast and not be a real benefit to the country.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is important that every voice is heard when it comes to elections. otherwise we cannot be sure the government really represents the people.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: With lower than ever voter turn outs, voting should be made mandatory so that democratic voting can be shared by all.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Elections are part of a democratic process, and freedom of expression is a cornerstone of this - making voting compulsory is a denial of the very liberty voting is meant to symbolise.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Choosing to abstain from voting is a vote in itself. refusing to support either candidate is a valid choice, and should be honored.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Voting should be a option for adults and making people to have to vote is out of mind and has no connection to democracy and to our style of life.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not introduce compulsory voting because in a democracy people should be free to choose their own actions.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Free speech is an unalienable right. no one should be compelled to be forced to voteKeypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting gives everyone a say in their electionsKeypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People could just vote for anyone without choosing the best canidateKeypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This would help get many more people to the polls to voteKeypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It should be an individual choice who to vote for, or indeed if to vote at all. the state has no role to coerce anyone into participating in elections if they do not want to.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nobody should have to cast a vote if they don't want to, and compulsory voting can be very inconvenient for those who can't get to a polling place for whatever reason.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting is unconstitutional, and forcing people to do something they do not want to do never turns out as planned.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would force those who do not agree with candidates to vote for someone they are not confident in.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would mean our electorate would more represent our vales.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting means that politicians have to address the concerns of the whole electorate rather than just focusing on those groups of people who usually turn out to voteKeypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: No one should be forced to do anything in our country.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should introduce compulsory voting because each citizen has a right to voice their opinion on who is leading this country.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Turn out figures are unacceptably low, we need to motivate people to be active voters for a representative democracyKeypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Voting should be a choice for every personKeypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Forcing everyone to vote will cause voter apathy which makes useless or ill informed votesKeypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting should be introduced because it actually increases voter turnout.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should do because then it will be more fair when the results come in because everyone has had their say.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would promote the general public to take responsibility in choosing their elected officials.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: In a democracy people have a right to choose not to voteKeypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be allowed to not vote as a way to protest the governmentKeypoint: Not everyone has the ability to go to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If it against their will people will choose randomly and it will negate the choices of othersKeypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: No one should be forced to vote. it goes against the principles of our nation and its freedoms. it is a right, but that doesn't mean anyone has to do it.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Voting is an important part of making democracy work, and should be mandatory.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting infringes on our freedom.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vote is the basis of democracy and must be mandatoryKeypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need more people to show up at the polls and vote.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is a violation of a person's rights to force them to vote in an election if they do not wish to do so.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A low turn out means that the elected government does not represent the true wishes of the country. making voting compulsory would mean that an elected government had a true mandate.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting forces people to engage with democracyKeypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting greatly increases voter turnoutKeypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Turn out figures are unacceptably low, we need to motivate people to be active voters for a representative democracyKeypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would mean the government more truly reflects the thoughts of the people.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Voting should be a option for adults and making people to have to vote is out of mind and has no connection to democracy and to our style of life.Keypoint: Not everyone has the ability to go to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would insure that every eligible voting citizen is able to aid in who they want for political offices.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It should be introduced as many people do not vote which reduces the turnoutKeypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be free to vote or not to voteKeypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should introduce compulsory voting as everyone should have a say in who is voted into offices.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting infringes on peoples rights.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People being forced to vote when they don't wish to will distort the results with unresearched and made-up candidates that they begrudgingly vote for.Keypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldnt because people might just vote for anyone if they have no interest in politics and could sway the vote.Keypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A low turn out means that the elected government does not represent the true wishes of the country. making voting compulsory would mean that an elected government had a true mandate.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Elected officials are currently chosen by about 20% of the population and thus do not represent everyoneKeypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should introduce compulsory voting as everyone should have a say in who is voted into offices.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would be beneficial because more people would take an interest in politics, creating a more fair representation in government.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting is a violation of one's free will and government should not infringe on a persons free will choice.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Part of living in a free nation is having the freedom not to particpate in the election processKeypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People have the right to not vote, if they so chooseKeypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is no way a person should be forced to vote in a compulsory voting ruling as not everyone stays versed in the political world which would end up with people just guessing the the best person may loose.Keypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Where compulsory voting exists, in countries like australia, participation rates are the highest in the world. this inevitably leads to more truly representative democracy.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The country is run by people who are selected by voters. all people have a stake in the government so all should be required to vote and show their opinions.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: American citizens have the right to choose whether or not they want to vote.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should not be forced to vote any more than they should be forced to have insurance or be fined for the lack of.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Everyone should vote, and the only way to ensure that happens is by instituting compulsory voting.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would require everyone to participate in our democracy and ensure that a candidate is selected by more than just the 10 or 20 percent of the population that gets out to vote.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some people don't care about voting and if required would just pick random choices, which could have disastrous consequences.Keypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would insure that every eligible voting citizen is able to aid in who they want for political offices.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People have self ownership and can choose to not voteKeypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some may not like the choice of canidates so they should not have to vote.Keypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting gives everyone a say in their electionsKeypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is the duty of eveyone to be aware of the political situation and have your say for your benefitKeypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People who are old enough to vote should do their part to help the country.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If everyone voted there would be a fairer and more accurate representation of leaders and government and requiring voting is the only way to achieve this.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should introduce compulsory voting as everyone should have a say in who is voted into offices.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting educates the population.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People who are old enough to vote should do their part to help the country.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting goes against people's liberties and freedoms.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need more people to speak in electionsKeypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Voting is a responsibility and should be mandatory.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some may not like the choice of canidates so they should not have to vote.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting improves voting turnaround.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Voting is a matter of choice and should not be forced.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The right to vote is a democratic right, it is not however democratic to force people to vote, people can abstain if they wishKeypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would saturate the polls with new faces, causing more change and better results.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would only cause uneducated votes to be cast and not be a real benefit to the country.Keypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Voting should be a option for adults and making people to have to vote is out of mind and has no connection to democracy and to our style of life.Keypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If someone has no choice it is wrong to insist that they chooseKeypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Forcing people to vote or face a penalty is what a dictatorship sounds like. compulsory voting is a bad idea. i don't believe it would change the results anyways.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It should be the right of the individual whether to vote or not to vote.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting .Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting is against freedom, everyone has the right to choose whether or not they want to vote in a free & open societyKeypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People will be forced to vote for a person they do not want to. they will just mark something and potentially effect the nation.Keypoint: Compulsory voting can cause people to vote in an uninformed/random manner", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting makes the population more involved in the election process, and would give results that more accurately reflected the will of the electors.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting will be difficult to enforce on the elderly and others who will have a difficult time voting.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Would increase voter turnout. guarantees that everyone has a say.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would get everyone a voice in the electionKeypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It's important that everyone have a say by voting. if everyone had to vote we would have a fair view of what everyone thought about who should be elected, not just those who could be bothered to turn up.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Everyone should vote, and the only way to ensure that happens is by instituting compulsory voting.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not introduce compulsory voting because in a democracy people should be free to choose their own actions.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: You can't force someone to vote,what if they don't like either party, not voting is them expressing this.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Looking at the current state of politics around the world it is evident that democracy only exists through vigilance. compulsory voting would help to keep democracy alive when under threat.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This country believes in free will. no person should be forced to vote. even by not voting a person is making a statement about their opinion of the country.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would see to it that we have the person the people, all the people, truly want in each area of our government.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting forces people to engage with democracyKeypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would insure everyone has a say in voting as well as be a way to aid in eliminating electoral voting as compulsory would be a more accurate voting system for the people's voice.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Everyone has a right to vote and to not vote if they don't want to. if someone doesn't think any of the candidates are capable then they shouldn't be forced to put them in office.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should do because then it will be more fair when the results come in because everyone has had their say.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would mean that every voice is heard and every one is counted.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People will be forced to vote for a person they do not want to. they will just mark something and potentially effect the nation.Keypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Being forced to do anything inhibits freedom.Keypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This would ensure that everyone's opinion is being represented and that everyone will have to think and take part in politics and how it affects them.Keypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting will be difficult to enforce on the elderly and others who will have a difficult time voting.Keypoint: Not everyone has the ability to go to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would be an effective antidote to voter suppression. more voter participation makes for a healthier democracy.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If everyone voted there would be a fairer and more accurate representation of leaders and government and requiring voting is the only way to achieve this.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Forcing people to vote wouldn't make much difference, they could just chose anyone instead of who is best for the jobKeypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People have the right to vote. they shouldnt be forced to if they arent interestedKeypoint: Citizens have a right not to vote", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People could just vote for anyone without choosing the best canidateKeypoint: Abstaining from a vote is also reflecting your preferences", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting makes for more informed votersKeypoint: People have an obligation to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Making voting compulsory goes fundamentally against democratic government. a choice not to vote is as valid a choice as voting for a party.Keypoint: Not everyone has the ability to go to vote", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It should be everyone's responsibility to vote so there is a fair representation at the polling station rather than just a small percentage deciding the fate of everyone.Keypoint: Compulsory voting increases representation", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Too many people do not take responsibility for their part in democracyKeypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Compulsory voting would ensure that the person or party elected is the one that geniunely has the most support of the entire electorate.Keypoint: Compulsory voting will cause more people to become interested in politics", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - } - ] -} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/tasks/task1300_kpa_keypoint_matching_cannabis_topic.json b/tasks/task1300_kpa_keypoint_matching_cannabis_topic.json deleted file mode 100644 index 22e4f33db..000000000 --- a/tasks/task1300_kpa_keypoint_matching_cannabis_topic.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2740 +0,0 @@ -{ - "Contributors": [ - "Arjun Ashok" - ], - "Source": [ - "ArgKP (https://github.com/IBM/KPA_2021_shared_task)" - ], - "Definition": "The input contains an argument and a keypoint on the topic \"We should legalize cannabis\", separated by \"\".Your task is to answer if the keypoint matches the argument and summarizes exactly what the argument means, in the context of this topic.", - "Categories": [ - "Classification -> Verification -> Summary Verification", - "Text Comparison" - ], - "Domains": [ - "Reviews", - "Law", - "Government and Politics", - "Dialogue" - ], - "Input_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Output_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Instruction_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Positive Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: It can be very beneficial for people with certain illnesses so should be legalKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that it can be very beneficial for people with certain illnesses so should be legal" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize cannabis because it would cut down on crime and illegal dealings.Keypoint: Legalizing cannabis will reduce black-market/criminal activity", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that we should legalize cannabis because it would cut down on crime and illegal dealings." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing marijuana would benefit the black market / drug cartels since the prices charged by state-licensed sellers can easily be undercut by cartels.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that legalizing marijuana would benefit the black market / drug cartels since the prices charged by state-licensed sellers can easily be undercut by cartels." - } - ], - "Negative Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis should be legalized as it has been medically proved to be a beneficial pain management treatment for people who may not have direct access to a physician.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that cannabis should be legalized as it has been medically proved to be a beneficial pain management treatment for people who may not have direct access to a physician." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis especially the skunk variety can be very harmful to people and can lead on to them using harder drugs so therefore it should be illegal.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that cannabis especially the skunk variety can be very harmful to people and can lead on to them using harder drugs so therefore it should be illegal." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing cannabis would lead to more car accidents with people driving under the influenceKeypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that legalizing cannabis would lead to more car accidents with people driving under the influence" - } - ], - "Instances": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Smoking cannabis causes unknown brain damage and can have effects lasting years after the last time it was smoked. people using cannabis are more likely to have mental health problems.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The medicinal use of cannabis is so widespread, accepted and proven that its legalization is unstoppableKeypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is a safe medicinal plant, it helps people.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is considered a soft drug and has been shown to be successful in the treatment of range of mental and physical illnesses. legalizing it reduces the criminality associated with its distributionKeypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marijuana is part of drug culture so using it leads to other, much more dangerous drug use.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is no worse than alcohol, which has been legal for years, it's a waste of money to enforce a pointless law.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis can be a gateway drug for other more harmful substances, and starts the user on a slippery, downward slope of dependence and addiction.Keypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Smoking cannabis causes unknown brain damage and can have effects lasting years after the last time it was smoked. people using cannabis are more likely to have mental health problems.Keypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalising cannabis would take the trade out of the hands of criminal gangsKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: American academy of pediatrics said that adverse effects of teen marijuana use include memory, attention and concentration problems; alterations in motor control, coordination, reaction time and problem-solving abilitiesKeypoint: Legal cannabis will boost the black-market/criminal activity", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize cannabis, it is a gateway drug and causes psychosis and paranoiaKeypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize cannabis because it can relieve pain for people with serious illnesses such as cancer and msKeypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize cannabis because it is a gateway drugKeypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It has many good uses & could be a good tax revenue generator for the states & federal governmentKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is less dangerous than other things which are currently legal, such as alcohol and cigarettes. it also has many medical usesKeypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't legalize cannabis as it could lead to an addiction of other, more addictive drugs which could then lead to turning to crime as a way of getting hold of those drugsKeypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize cannabis as it is a harmful foreign substance that causes brain damage when consumed on a regular basis.Keypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis might encourage young people to use illegal drugs alsoKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalising cannabis could normalise it and encourage more children to partakeKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is the last hope for many people with chronic pain, and it is way safer than many prescription drugs.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis can help cure people with several problems, legalizing it will provide people with a better quality productKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis should be banned because it is a gateway drug to other harder drugs that are mind altering.Keypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Law enforcement are unable to effectively prevent the large scale distribution of cannabis and it's using up too many resources so they should just legalize and regulate it instead.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is seen as a gateway to other more harmful drugs and shown to have harmful effects to mental health and should, therefore, be banned.Keypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marijuana is part of drug culture so using it leads to other, much more dangerous drug use.Keypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing and taxing cannabis would bring in billions of dollars to fund the government.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis leads on to much harder drugs and addictionKeypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis can offer solace for those people who suffer from great pain due to illness or disability. it is often better than medication that is currently available.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is a hallucinogenic product that can harm a persons memory, lower their inhibitions and cause a person to make dangerous choices and is addictive. all of these behaviors can be destructive.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Because cannabis use has associated health risks such as developing schizophrenia or other psychotic illness it should not be legalizedKeypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Buying illegal marijuana on the street is unsafe. it could be laced with unknown substances. legal marijuana is regulated for consumer safety.Keypoint: If cannabis was legalized it could be regulated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is safer than alcohol, there's no overdosing and driving while high is less likely to cause an accident than driving drunk. there's no reason for it to be illegal.Keypoint: Cannabis is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize cannabis because it can cause overdoses and mental illnessesKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize cannabis for best healthy of bodyKeypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is less harmful than alcohol and takes up too much of law enforcement resources because of its outlaw status.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing cannabis would save us money we waste on law enforcement and imprisonment for this nonviolent offense.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize cannabis since it is a mood-altering drug that may lead younger people into trying more drugs.Keypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Adults should be able to choose substances that they want to use.Keypoint: People should be allowed to do whatever they want to their own bodies", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It should be legal for the people that need it to help them deal with health issuesKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldnt legalize cannabis like any drug its addictive and can be abused and affect the sensesKeypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is safer than alcohol, there's no overdosing and driving while high is less likely to cause an accident than driving drunk. there's no reason for it to be illegal.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't legalize cannabis because it has been proven to increase the likelihood of mental illnesses such as depressionKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis should remain illegal as it can have bad affects on a persons health.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: So many people already use cannabis that the only real difference legalizing would make would be that the profits could be taxed.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis has proven to be a better alternative to opioids in the management of pain. it is a natural plant and should be legal.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is not a dangerous drug such as meth and should be legalized for all the country to enjoy, like alochol.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't legalize cannabis because then it will be easier to get and i think dealers will get it easier and then try to resell it for more.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis helps cancer patients more than pharmacy drugs.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is a vital drug for many, providing relief from the pain of degeneterative diseases (eg multiple schlerosis) unobtainable elsewhere.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is a useful medicinal plant which people should be able to use legally.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is useful in helping people with mental and physical diseases and legalizing it would make it easier for them to acquire it.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize cannabis because it will bring revenue for the government and can be made to a quality standard ensuring no hidden ingredients.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis has medical benefits that could be used to give relief to people with chronic illnesses.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is seen as a gateway to other more harmful drugs and shown to have harmful effects to mental health and should, therefore, be banned.Keypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marijuana harms the brain and any amount of cannabis use may increase the risk of developing mental health problemsKeypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Allowing people to use a gateway drug like cannabis is steering them towards a life of addiction.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize cannabis as it can help aid the recovery of many medical needs that alternative medicines don't helpKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis should be legalized as there it is less addictive than other drugs including smoking and alcohol and does not result in the destructive behaviors associated with them.Keypoint: Cannabis is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If cannabis was legalized it would make it more accessible to young people and possibly lead to stronger drugs.Keypoint: Legal cannabis will boost the black-market/criminal activity", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis should be legalized as it can be beneficial to use cannabis for certain medial conditions.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing cannabis could encourage more young people to take it up.Keypoint: Legal cannabis can be getting to the hand of underage teenagers/children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize a dangerous drug, it gives it a stamp of approval and this is an irresponsible message to send to youthKeypoint: Legal cannabis can be getting to the hand of underage teenagers/children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalization will allow the government to set age restrictions on consumersKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize cannabis as it appears to do more good than harm for those that have illnesses.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing recreational marijuana will add billions to the economy, create hundreds of thousands of jobs, and save limited police resourcesKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is less harmful than tobacco. it is time we allow people to make their own decisions about cannabis.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing cannabis would make it less profitable for criminalsKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is no more harmful than alcohol which is legal.Keypoint: Cannabis is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis can not be legal because of the damage that excessive consumption doesKeypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize cannabis because it helps with medical issues some people haveKeypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis should be legalized just for the tax revenue alone. it is widely used and safer than alcohol or tobacco. let's make money and make it legal now.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing marijuana would end the costly enforcement of marijuana laws and free up police resources which could focus on more serious crimes.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Buying illegal marijuana on the street is unsafe. it could be laced with unknown substances. legal marijuana is regulated for consumer safety.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing marijuana would increase its use by teens. marijuana is especially dangerous for young people, because their brains are not fully developed.Keypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marijuana-related traffic accidents and deaths would increase if marijuana was legalized.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing cannabis opens the door to many more potentially dangerous drugs being legalized, we must make sure that the only legalized use of any drug is controlled by the medical profession.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: You can't legalize marijuana until you find a way to do test for it on auto drivers.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: While benefits exist, so do risks. new studies have shown that there are also dangers associated with use especially by teenagers, where their brain is impacted. long term effects are too risky.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People have the right to live their lives in any way they choose and the government doesn't have the right to tell adults what they can put in their own bodiesKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize cannabis so people can use it for medicinal purposesKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The increased tax revenue gained from legalizing marijuana can be used to fund public projects, fix roads, improve schools, etc.Keypoint: Cannabis is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis can cause psychosis and permanent mental illness, additionally cannabis users often go to on to take to harder drugs, increasing the risk of illegal drug taking and criminal activity.Keypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize cannabis because it helps many sick peopleKeypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing cannabis is dangerous to society as users may overdose.Keypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis should be legalized just for the tax revenue alone. it is widely used and safer than alcohol or tobacco. let's make money and make it legal now.Keypoint: Cannabis is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is less dangerous than other things which are currently legal, such as alcohol and cigarettes. it also has many medical usesKeypoint: Cannabis is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing cannabis can increase the number of drug addicts, therefore we shall notKeypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marijuana harms the brain and any amount of cannabis use may increase the risk of developing mental health problemsKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is know to lead to progressive drug use, leading to addictions to other substances.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing marijuana would lead to a reduction in gang-related drug violence.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is a gateway drug to getting involved with more serious drugs and therefore shouldn't be legalised.Keypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize cannabis so people can use it for medicinal purposesKeypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Richard nixon scheduled cannabis along with harder drugs in order to disenfranchise voters who would oppose him. cannabis has equivalent harms to alcohol. therefore it should be legalized and regulated.Keypoint: Cannabis is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis can be used effectively for medicinal purposes to provide relief from sever medical conditions. legalizing cannabis would reduce the amount of criminal activities and make our streets safer.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is a gateway drug that can lead to users using more potent drugs like cocaine.Keypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize cannabis because it would cut down on crime and illegal dealings.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis has been shown to provide pain relief in chronically ill patients, legalization would help ease their suffering.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is gateway drug to other harmful substances such as cocaineKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Richard nixon scheduled cannabis along with harder drugs in order to disenfranchise voters who would oppose him. cannabis has equivalent harms to alcohol. therefore it should be legalized and regulated.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing cannabis would make it less profitable for criminalsKeypoint: Legalizing cannabis will reduce black-market/criminal activity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sale of cannabis should not be legalized because it is a dangerous drug with known risks and adverse effectsKeypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis can help people alleviate painKeypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marijuana use can lead to the use of harder, more harmful drugs such as heroin and cocaine.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize cannabis because it is has many health benefitsKeypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize cannabis because it helps with medical issues some people haveKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The medicinal use of cannabis is so widespread, accepted and proven that its legalization is unstoppableKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize cannabis because it is harmless.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is no worse than alcohol, which has been legal for years, it's a waste of money to enforce a pointless law.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The increased tax revenue gained from legalizing marijuana can be used to fund public projects, fix roads, improve schools, etc.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It impairs your mind so it should be illegalKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis should remain illegal as it can have bad affects on a persons health.Keypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't legalize cannabis because it could potentially lead to increases in addictions to other drugs that are far more dangerous than cannabisKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If there are no third party harms, then an individual should be able to use any substance they so choose.Keypoint: People should be allowed to do whatever they want to their own bodies", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis especially the skunk variety can be very harmful to people and can lead on to them using harder drugs so therefore it should be illegal.Keypoint: Legal cannabis will boost the black-market/criminal activity", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize cannabis because it is a gateway drugKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis should be legalized as it can be beneficial to use cannabis for certain medial conditions.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Alcohol and tobacco cause way more damage to society than cannabis does, yet they are still legal.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis has many benefits to cancer patients and people with other painful conditions.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis has been proven to have a link with schizophrenia. cannabis should not be legalized unless this link is disproven.Keypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The healing properties of cannabis are necessary to alleviate the health of many patients who do not have access to it due to its restrictionKeypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marijuana has numerous proven medical benefits.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Given the now proven medical benefits, the legalisation of cannabis is now inevitableKeypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis can offer solace for those people who suffer from great pain due to illness or disability. it is often better than medication that is currently available.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Laboratory testing and regulations of legalized marijuana will ensure that it is safe for use and free of harmful substancesKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is known for its medicinal properties, people should have the freedom to use what calms their painKeypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize cannabis then more children will get a hold of itKeypoint: Legal cannabis can be getting to the hand of underage teenagers/children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marijuana has numerous proven medical benefits.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis help patients with cancer pain, a natural remedy for relief as well as other medical issues such as insomnia, without any unnatural chemical additives.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We must support the use of legalize cannabis for healthKeypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legal domestic production of legalized marijuana is taking money away from drug cartelsKeypoint: Legalizing cannabis will reduce black-market/criminal activity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It helps so many people and there is no good reason for it to be illegal when alcohol is not.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If alcohol is legal why not cannabis ? alcohol is far more dangerous than cannabisKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Due to so much controversy and contraband of this substance, it would save many deathsKeypoint: Legalizing cannabis will reduce black-market/criminal activity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis can cause impaired driving and can be difficult to regulateKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis can be used effectively for medicinal purposes to provide relief from sever medical conditions. legalizing cannabis would reduce the amount of criminal activities and make our streets safer.Keypoint: Cannabis is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis has many valuable medical uses.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis should be legalized as there it is less addictive than other drugs including smoking and alcohol and does not result in the destructive behaviors associated with them.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It will encourage the younger generation to start taking the drug, there will be more cases of people driving under the influence which is a danger to others resulting in serious injury or even deathKeypoint: Legal cannabis can be getting to the hand of underage teenagers/children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis especially the skunk variety can be very harmful to people and can lead on to them using harder drugs so therefore it should be illegal.Keypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sale of cannabis should not be legalized because it is a dangerous drug with known risks and adverse effectsKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is a gateway drug to getting involved with more serious drugs and therefore shouldn't be legalised.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: You can't legalize marijuana until you find a way to do test for it on auto drivers.Keypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People use it anyway and it has many health benefits.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is known for its medicinal properties, people should have the freedom to use what calms their painKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis has multiple documented health benefitsKeypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Availability of legalized marijuana would have a trickle-down impact and the drug would find its way to underage personsKeypoint: Legal cannabis can be getting to the hand of underage teenagers/children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis leads on to much harder drugs and addictionKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing marijuana would put one more harmful substance in our societyKeypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis should be legalized just for the tax revenue alone. it is widely used and safer than alcohol or tobacco. let's make money and make it legal now.Keypoint: If cannabis was legalized it could be regulated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis should be legalized just for the tax revenue alone. it is widely used and safer than alcohol or tobacco. let's make money and make it legal now.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should allow personal choice in this matter, legalized cannabis is safer, reduces criminal gains from the sale of it and allows for medical capabilities to be exploredKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize cannabis because it can help people with certain health problems be relieved of their symptomsKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is a wonder drug for people who suffer from certain diseases, as it can significantly reduce pain.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing cannabis would lower incarceration rates and bring in a lot of revenueKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing cannabis would cause overdose problems and possible deathKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize cannabis because a natural plant should not be regulated. cannabis is shown to naturally help with certain medical conditions and it's much safer than alcohol for recreational use.Keypoint: Cannabis is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is a harmful and addictive drug that has a high risk of causing long term health problems including serious mental illness, it should never be made legal.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is seen as a gateway to other more harmful drugs and shown to have harmful effects to mental health and should, therefore, be banned.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis legalization could be a lucrative source of revenueKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis carries carcinogenic risks; government should minimize risks.Keypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis increases drug trafficking and violence in the streetsKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis has many medicinal properties that pharmaceutical drugs can't fix and should be legalizedKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It helps so many people and there is no good reason for it to be illegal when alcohol is not.Keypoint: If cannabis was legalized it could be regulated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing marijuana would lead to an increased incidence of marijuana addiction.Keypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is a vital drug for many, providing relief from the pain of degeneterative diseases (eg multiple schlerosis) unobtainable elsewhere.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If cannabis was legalized it would make it more accessible to young people and possibly lead to stronger drugs.Keypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: So many people could use cannabis for pain relief that to legalize it is the only sensible option.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis has been shown to negatively affect the brain, causing psychosis and paranoia and should continue to be controlledKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis has been shown to be less harmful than alcohol so legalising it makes perfect sense.Keypoint: Cannabis is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Because cannabis use has associated health risks such as developing schizophrenia or other psychotic illness it should not be legalizedKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is no more dangerous than alcohol which is legal.Keypoint: Cannabis is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The medicinal effects of cannabis are very necessary for our societyKeypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption causes more damage to people than cannabis smoking does and they are both legalKeypoint: Cannabis is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing cannabis will make it more easily accessible to those who need it for medical reasons.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't legalize cannabis because then it will be easier to get and i think dealers will get it easier and then try to resell it for more.Keypoint: Legal cannabis will boost the black-market/criminal activity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalization of marijuana will create a huge industry that utilizes people for profit and targets childrenKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't legalize cannabis because it has been proven to increase the likelihood of mental illnesses such as depressionKeypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalising cannabis could normalise it and encourage more children to partakeKeypoint: Legal cannabis can be getting to the hand of underage teenagers/children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis has been proven to have a link with schizophrenia. cannabis should not be legalized unless this link is disproven.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis can be used for a number of medical issues so making it legal will help with thatKeypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is extremely useful in battling a wide range of medical maladiesKeypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is extremely useful in battling a wide range of medical maladiesKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Given the now proven medical benefits, the legalisation of cannabis is now inevitableKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis has been shown to be less harmful than alcohol so legalising it makes perfect sense.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis provides an introduction to more addictive drugs and can cause mental illness and so should not be legalizedKeypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis has multiple documented health benefitsKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The use of cannabis does not stop there. many go for the next high of hashish. then on to other drugs. cannabis should not be allowed to stop this progressions.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We must support the use of legalize cannabis for healthKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis might encourage young people to use illegal drugs alsoKeypoint: Legal cannabis can be getting to the hand of underage teenagers/children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize cannabis because it will bring revenue for the government and can be made to a quality standard ensuring no hidden ingredients.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The healing properties of cannabis are necessary to alleviate the health of many patients who do not have access to it due to its restrictionKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If there are no third party harms, then an individual should be able to use any substance they so choose.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalized marijuana use will lower street crime by paralyzing the criminal market where violence actually occursKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis has been shown to cause mental problems in teen users and shouldn't be legal.Keypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It has many good uses & could be a good tax revenue generator for the states & federal governmentKeypoint: Cannabis is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize cannabis, it is a gateway drug and causes psychosis and paranoiaKeypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize cannabis because it is has many health benefitsKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Law enforcement are unable to effectively prevent the large scale distribution of cannabis and it's using up too many resources so they should just legalize and regulate it instead.Keypoint: If cannabis was legalized it could be regulated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing marijuana boosts the economy and increases tax revenue.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis can help cure people with several problems, legalizing it will provide people with a better quality productKeypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize cannabis for health purposesKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is less dangerous than other things which are currently legal, such as alcohol and cigarettes. it also has many medical usesKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The medicinal effects of cannabis have brought many benefits to our society in recent years. that is why i believe that its legalization should be allowed in our society.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize cannabis because it helps many people that have painKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis has been shown to cause mental problems in teen users and shouldn't be legal.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: To legalize cannabis would be to tell people that it is safe to use, which is untrue, which would result in many more using it and an epidemic in psychological problemsKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing marijuana would end the costly enforcement of marijuana laws and free up police resources which could focus on more serious crimes.Keypoint: Legalizing cannabis will reduce black-market/criminal activity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Alcohol and tobacco cause way more damage to society than cannabis does, yet they are still legal.Keypoint: Cannabis is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis use leads to the use of other drugs.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalized cannabis can be more closely regulated and taxed. it makes it safer than illegal weed and helps provide tax dollars.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Laboratory testing and regulations of legalized marijuana will ensure that it is safe for use and free of harmful substancesKeypoint: If cannabis was legalized it could be regulated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize cannabis as it is a harmful foreign substance that causes brain damage when consumed on a regular basis.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis can be a gateway drug for other more harmful substances, and starts the user on a slippery, downward slope of dependence and addiction.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Smoking cannabis increases the risk of depression for young people who have a genetic vulnerability to the mental illnessKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis helps cancer patients more than pharmacy drugs.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We cannot legalize drugs like cannabis because we will destroy our society by legalizing drug addictionKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis use leads to the use of other drugs.Keypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis legalization would make our roads more dangerous.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This is a potential gateway drug towards more dangerous substancesKeypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalise cannabis because scientific studies have proven that it helps people with diseases such as parkinson's and will be much cheaper than the current medicines.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize cannabis because it will bring revenue for the government and can be made to a quality standard ensuring no hidden ingredients.Keypoint: If cannabis was legalized it could be regulated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Smoking cannabis at a young age can disrupt the natural growth of the brainKeypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is gateway drug to other harmful substances such as cocaineKeypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The entire chain of suppliers, including growers, distributors, and retailers will be regulated while marijuana is legalized and business is taken away from the drug cartelsKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis has been proven as very effective for medical useKeypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing cannabis would increase its usage and lead to many people becoming addictsKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing cannabis opens the door to many more potentially dangerous drugs being legalized, we must make sure that the only legalized use of any drug is controlled by the medical profession.Keypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be allowed to decide whether to use cannabis themselves.Keypoint: People should be allowed to do whatever they want to their own bodies", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize cannabis as it has been proven to have long term mental health and concentration issues.Keypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis should be legalized because it is a natural creation of the earth and no one has the right to deny others the opportunity to put into their bodies what they believe benefits themKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis especially the skunk variety can be very harmful to people and can lead on to them using harder drugs so therefore it should be illegal.Keypoint: Legal cannabis can be getting to the hand of underage teenagers/children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis has been proven to create or make worse mental conditions in teens.Keypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is a gateway drug that can lead to far worse drugsKeypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis can help people alleviate painKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing cannabis would cause overdose problems and possible deathKeypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The medical benefits of cannabis use has been documented in recent years. it's highly beneficial to those with epilepsy and cancer patients. access needs to expand to those who need it.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is the last hope for many people with chronic pain, and it is way safer than many prescription drugs.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalized cannabis because drug dealers will take advantage of it and very highly many many will addicted to itKeypoint: Legal cannabis will boost the black-market/criminal activity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing marijuana would increase its use by teens. marijuana is especially dangerous for young people, because their brains are not fully developed.Keypoint: Legal cannabis can be getting to the hand of underage teenagers/children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People use it anyway and it has many health benefits.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Is proven by scientists that cannabis helps to improve many diseases and has been used for many years, so it must be legalKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Due to so much controversy and contraband of this substance, it would save many deathsKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is no more dangerous than alcohol which is legal.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is considered a soft drug and has been shown to be successful in the treatment of range of mental and physical illnesses. legalizing it reduces the criminality associated with its distributionKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legal domestic production of legalized marijuana is taking money away from drug cartelsKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is a gateway drug that can lead to far worse drugsKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalized cannabis can be more closely regulated and taxed. it makes it safer than illegal weed and helps provide tax dollars.Keypoint: If cannabis was legalized it could be regulated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing cannabis could encourage more young people to take it up.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis can potentially provide a route into experimenting with harder drugs.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis can be used effectively for medicinal purposes to provide relief from sever medical conditions. legalizing cannabis would reduce the amount of criminal activities and make our streets safer.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is a hallucinogenic product that can harm a persons memory, lower their inhibitions and cause a person to make dangerous choices and is addictive. all of these behaviors can be destructive.Keypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldnt legalize cannabis like any drug its addictive and can be abused and affect the sensesKeypoint: Legal cannabis will boost the black-market/criminal activity", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis legalization would make our roads more dangerous.Keypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis has been shown to provide pain relief in chronically ill patients, legalization would help ease their suffering.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalization of marijuana will create a huge industry that utilizes people for profit and targets childrenKeypoint: Legal cannabis can be getting to the hand of underage teenagers/children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Because cannabis helps regulate body weight, it only makes sense that it would help prevent and regulate diabetes.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalise cannabis because scientific studies have proven that it helps people with diseases such as parkinson's and will be much cheaper than the current medicines.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is seen as a gateway to other more harmful drugs and shown to have harmful effects to mental health and should, therefore, be banned.Keypoint: Legal cannabis will boost the black-market/criminal activity", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The use of cannabis does not stop there. many go for the next high of hashish. then on to other drugs. cannabis should not be allowed to stop this progressions.Keypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People have the right to live their lives in any way they choose and the government doesn't have the right to tell adults what they can put in their own bodiesKeypoint: People should be allowed to do whatever they want to their own bodies", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is no more harmful than alcohol which is legal.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize cannabis as it may help with medical complaints that other medications have failedKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is a gateway drug that can lead to users using more potent drugs like cocaine.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The legalization of cannabis directly impacts the illegal traffic by taking away the profitability of the business, and would allow alleviating the suffering of many people who get relief using it as medicine.Keypoint: Legalizing cannabis will reduce black-market/criminal activity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If people need it for health reasons then it is okKeypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This is a potential gateway drug towards more dangerous substancesKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is no worse than alcohol and should be legal to every adult american citizen.Keypoint: Cannabis is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing cannabis will just pave the way for other drugs to be legalized and it should not be allowed.Keypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is a gateway drug. studies have shown that a significant number of cannabis users go on to try stronger drugs such as opioids, cocaine and heroinKeypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The medicinal effects of cannabis have brought many benefits to our society in recent years. that is why i believe that its legalization should be allowed in our society.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is useful in helping people with mental and physical diseases and legalizing it would make it easier for them to acquire it.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is a dangerous drug and encourages crimeKeypoint: Legal cannabis will boost the black-market/criminal activity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize cannabis then more children will get a hold of itKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis has been proven as very effective for medical useKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't legalize cannabis because it will make the younger crowd think drugs aren't as bad as they are told and could lead them to experimenting with other drugs and creating a drug addictionKeypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis has been shown to be safer than alcohol and less addictive. there is no real reason to keep it an illegal substance.Keypoint: Cannabis is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is a gateway drug to more harmful drugs.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalized cannabis because drug dealers will take advantage of it and very highly many many will addicted to itKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing cannabis would lower incarceration rates and bring in a lot of revenueKeypoint: Legalizing cannabis will reduce black-market/criminal activity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The legalization of cannabis directly impacts the illegal traffic by taking away the profitability of the business, and would allow alleviating the suffering of many people who get relief using it as medicine.Keypoint: Cannabis is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is not a dangerous drug such as meth and should be legalized for all the country to enjoy, like alochol.Keypoint: Cannabis is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize cannabis because it can relieve pain for people with serious illnesses such as cancer and msKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If cannabis was legalized it would make it more accessible to young people and possibly lead to stronger drugs.Keypoint: Legal cannabis can be getting to the hand of underage teenagers/children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is a gateway drug, and we don't want to encourage people to go down this dangerous path.Keypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is a gateway drug to other more harmful drugs such as heroin.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing cannabis would save us money we waste on law enforcement and imprisonment for this nonviolent offense.Keypoint: Cannabis is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize cannabis because it will bring revenue for the government and can be made to a quality standard ensuring no hidden ingredients.Keypoint: Cannabis is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis has medical benefits that could be used to give relief to people with chronic illnesses.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The medicinal effects of cannabis are very necessary for our societyKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Is proven by scientists that cannabis helps to improve many diseases and has been used for many years, so it must be legalKeypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing marijuana would put one more harmful substance in our societyKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It should be legal for the people that need it to help them deal with health issuesKeypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis can cause psychosis and permanent mental illness, additionally cannabis users often go to on to take to harder drugs, increasing the risk of illegal drug taking and criminal activity.Keypoint: Legal cannabis can be getting to the hand of underage teenagers/children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis can potentially provide a route into experimenting with harder drugs.Keypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis use has been shown to adversely affect the brains of users. this has been proven by brain scans.Keypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize cannabis as it has been proven to have long term mental health and concentration issues.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalized marijuana use will lower street crime by paralyzing the criminal market where violence actually occursKeypoint: Legalizing cannabis will reduce black-market/criminal activity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It impairs your mind so it should be illegalKeypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is a holistic and natural cure for cancer patients and should therefore be legalizedKeypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't legalize cannabis because it could potentially lead to increases in addictions to other drugs that are far more dangerous than cannabisKeypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: American academy of pediatrics said that adverse effects of teen marijuana use include memory, attention and concentration problems; alterations in motor control, coordination, reaction time and problem-solving abilitiesKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By legalizing cannabis you are making it easier to get a hold of, which then encourages younger adults/teenagers to start smoking & become addictedKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If cannabis is legal it can be regulated and taxedKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Making it legal would just lead to worse drug usageKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis can be used effectively for medicinal purposes to provide relief from sever medical conditions. legalizing cannabis would reduce the amount of criminal activities and make our streets safer.Keypoint: Legalizing cannabis will reduce black-market/criminal activity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Making it legal would just lead to worse drug usageKeypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis should not be legalized because it is a gateway drug to harder substance abuse.Keypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize cannabis because it helps many sick peopleKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is only a gateway to much more dangerous drugs.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: To legalize cannabis would be to tell people that it is safe to use, which is untrue, which would result in many more using it and an epidemic in psychological problemsKeypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is a wonder drug for people who suffer from certain diseases, as it can significantly reduce pain.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing cannabis will just lead many people to experiment with other more dangerous drugsKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis help patients with cancer pain, a natural remedy for relief as well as other medical issues such as insomnia, without any unnatural chemical additives.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis has been proven to alleviate pain, hep with insomnia and decrease stress in a natural method.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is only a gateway to much more dangerous drugs.Keypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing cannabis would increase its usage and lead to many people becoming addictsKeypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The medical benefits of cannabis use has been documented in recent years. it's highly beneficial to those with epilepsy and cancer patients. access needs to expand to those who need it.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is considered by many to be less harmful than alcohol or tobacco and can be used for medicinal purposes. legalizing it would also bring in extra tax revenueKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: I has been scientifically proven that cannabis is useful in treating pain in ms sufferers. it has also shown great promise in the reduction of seizures in those with sever epilepsy.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The legalization of cannabis directly impacts the illegal traffic by taking away the profitability of the business, and would allow alleviating the suffering of many people who get relief using it as medicine.Keypoint: People should be allowed to do whatever they want to their own bodies", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is seen by many as a gateway drug, namely that using cannabis results in a much higher chance of users moving on to harder drugs such as opioids or even heroin and cocaineKeypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis legalization could be a lucrative source of revenueKeypoint: Cannabis is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Recreational weed will increase dui incidentsKeypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize cannabis, it is a gateway drug and causes psychosis and paranoiaKeypoint: Legal cannabis will boost the black-market/criminal activity", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is a safe medicinal plant, it helps people.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing marijuana would lead to a reduction in gang-related drug violence.Keypoint: Legalizing cannabis will reduce black-market/criminal activity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis has been proved to be less harmful than other drugs and play a beneficial and safe form of medication for some illnesses and so should be legalizedKeypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis especially the skunk variety can be very harmful to people and can lead on to them using harder drugs so therefore it should be illegal.Keypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We cannot legalize drugs like cannabis because we will destroy our society by legalizing drug addictionKeypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis can relieve the spasticity of the muscles that is sometimes associated with multiple sclerosis and paralysisKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If cannabis was legalized it would make it more accessible to young people and possibly lead to stronger drugs.Keypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis use has been shown to adversely affect the brains of users. this has been proven by brain scans.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis can provide relief for a number of ailments without the side effects of regular medications.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis can cause psychosis and permanent mental illness, additionally cannabis users often go to on to take to harder drugs, increasing the risk of illegal drug taking and criminal activity.Keypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize cannabis because a natural plant should not be regulated. cannabis is shown to naturally help with certain medical conditions and it's much safer than alcohol for recreational use.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It will encourage the younger generation to start taking the drug, there will be more cases of people driving under the influence which is a danger to others resulting in serious injury or even deathKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing it would eliminate the black market for cannabis and will also free up prisons of people who are arrested and sentenced for cannabis possession.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marijuana has proven medical benefits for patients suffering from diseases such as cancer, aids, and glaucoma.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize cannabis because it can help people with certain health problems be relieved of their symptomsKeypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is know to lead to progressive drug use, leading to addictions to other substances.Keypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It can be very beneficial for people with certain illnesses so should be legalKeypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is considered by many to be less harmful than alcohol or tobacco and can be used for medicinal purposes. legalizing it would also bring in extra tax revenueKeypoint: If cannabis was legalized it could be regulated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing cannabis is dangerous to society as users may overdose.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Recreational weed will increase dui incidentsKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize cannabis as it appears to do more good than harm for those that have illnesses.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis can not be legal because of the damage that excessive consumption doesKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It helps so many people and there is no good reason for it to be illegal when alcohol is not.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis has been proven to create or make worse mental conditions in teens.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: American academy of pediatrics said that adverse effects of teen marijuana use include memory, attention and concentration problems; alterations in motor control, coordination, reaction time and problem-solving abilitiesKeypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If cannabis is legal it can be regulated and taxedKeypoint: If cannabis was legalized it could be regulated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing cannabis can increase the number of drug addicts, therefore we shall notKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Smoking marijuana is no worse than drinking booze and that goes on everywhere.Keypoint: Cannabis is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is a gateway drug and many people start with it and end up on far worse.Keypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis provides an introduction to more addictive drugs and can cause mental illness and so should not be legalizedKeypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing recreational marijuana will add billions to the economy, create hundreds of thousands of jobs, and save limited police resourcesKeypoint: Cannabis is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing marijuana would benefit the black market / drug cartels since the prices charged by state-licensed sellers can easily be undercut by cartels.Keypoint: Legal cannabis will boost the black-market/criminal activity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize cannabis since it is a mood-altering drug that may lead younger people into trying more drugs.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize cannabis because it can cause overdoses and mental illnessesKeypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The entire chain of suppliers, including growers, distributors, and retailers will be regulated while marijuana is legalized and business is taken away from the drug cartelsKeypoint: Legalizing cannabis will reduce black-market/criminal activity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldnt legalize cannabis like any drug its addictive and can be abused and affect the sensesKeypoint: Legal cannabis can be getting to the hand of underage teenagers/children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The legalization of cannabis directly impacts the illegal traffic by taking away the profitability of the business, and would allow alleviating the suffering of many people who get relief using it as medicine.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is seen by many as a gateway drug, namely that using cannabis results in a much higher chance of users moving on to harder drugs such as opioids or even heroin and cocaineKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If alcohol is legal why not cannabis ? alcohol is far more dangerous than cannabisKeypoint: Cannabis is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be able to decide themselves if they want to use itKeypoint: People should be allowed to do whatever they want to their own bodies", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis will lead to the use of hard drugs which will increase crimeKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: I has been scientifically proven that cannabis is useful in treating pain in ms sufferers. it has also shown great promise in the reduction of seizures in those with sever epilepsy.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is less harmful than alcohol and takes up too much of law enforcement resources because of its outlaw status.Keypoint: Cannabis is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Allowing people to use a gateway drug like cannabis is steering them towards a life of addiction.Keypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize cannabis as it can help aid the recovery of many medical needs that alternative medicines don't helpKeypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marijuana has proven medical benefits for patients suffering from diseases such as cancer, aids, and glaucoma.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption causes more damage to people than cannabis smoking does and they are both legalKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize cannabis, it is a gateway drug and causes psychosis and paranoiaKeypoint: Legal cannabis can be getting to the hand of underage teenagers/children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is a gateway drug. studies have shown that a significant number of cannabis users go on to try stronger drugs such as opioids, cocaine and heroinKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalization will allow the government to set age restrictions on consumersKeypoint: If cannabis was legalized it could be regulated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Adults should be able to choose substances that they want to use.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The legalization of cannabis directly impacts the illegal traffic by taking away the profitability of the business, and would allow alleviating the suffering of many people who get relief using it as medicine.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: So many people could use cannabis for pain relief that to legalize it is the only sensible option.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be allowed to decide whether to use cannabis themselves.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Smoking cannabis increases the risk of depression for young people who have a genetic vulnerability to the mental illnessKeypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis should be legalized as it has been medically proved to be a beneficial pain management treatment for people who may not have direct access to a physician.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should allow personal choice in this matter, legalized cannabis is safer, reduces criminal gains from the sale of it and allows for medical capabilities to be exploredKeypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: While benefits exist, so do risks. new studies have shown that there are also dangers associated with use especially by teenagers, where their brain is impacted. long term effects are too risky.Keypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If cannabis was legalized it would make it more accessible to young people and possibly lead to stronger drugs.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing marijuana would lead to an increased incidence of marijuana addiction.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis has been shown to negatively affect the brain, causing psychosis and paranoia and should continue to be controlledKeypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The use of cannabis can provide a route into more harmful drug use.Keypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It has too many bad side effects so should not be legalKeypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is a gateway drug to more harmful drugs.Keypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is a gateway drug, and we don't want to encourage people to go down this dangerous path.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis should not be legalized because it is a gateway drug to harder substance abuse.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis has many benefits to cancer patients and people with other painful conditions.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The use of cannabis can provide a route into more harmful drug use.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Availability of legalized marijuana would have a trickle-down impact and the drug would find its way to underage personsKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing cannabis would lead to more car accidents with people driving under the influenceKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marijuana-related traffic accidents and deaths would increase if marijuana was legalized.Keypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis should be legalized because it is a natural creation of the earth and no one has the right to deny others the opportunity to put into their bodies what they believe benefits themKeypoint: People should be allowed to do whatever they want to their own bodies", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis has been proven to alleviate pain, hep with insomnia and decrease stress in a natural method.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is no worse than alcohol and should be legal to every adult american citizen.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is less harmful than tobacco. it is time we allow people to make their own decisions about cannabis.Keypoint: Cannabis is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis has been proved to be less harmful than other drugs and play a beneficial and safe form of medication for some illnesses and so should be legalizedKeypoint: Cannabis is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It helps so many people and there is no good reason for it to be illegal when alcohol is not.Keypoint: Cannabis is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Smoking cannabis at a young age can disrupt the natural growth of the brainKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis carries carcinogenic risks; government should minimize risks.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing cannabis will just pave the way for other drugs to be legalized and it should not be allowed.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is a gateway drug and many people start with it and end up on far worse.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize cannabis for best healthy of bodyKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing cannabis will make it more easily accessible to those who need it for medical reasons.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis has many medicinal properties that pharmaceutical drugs can't fix and should be legalizedKeypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Smoking marijuana is no worse than drinking booze and that goes on everywhere.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Marijuana use can lead to the use of harder, more harmful drugs such as heroin and cocaine.Keypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If people need it for health reasons then it is okKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis will lead to the use of hard drugs which will increase crimeKeypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis increases drug trafficking and violence in the streetsKeypoint: Legal cannabis will boost the black-market/criminal activity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be able to decide themselves if they want to use itKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis has been shown to be safer than alcohol and less addictive. there is no real reason to keep it an illegal substance.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis should be banned because it is a gateway drug to other harder drugs that are mind altering.Keypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize cannabis because it is harmless.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is seen as a gateway to other more harmful drugs and shown to have harmful effects to mental health and should, therefore, be banned.Keypoint: Legal cannabis can be getting to the hand of underage teenagers/children", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis has many valuable medical uses.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing and taxing cannabis would bring in billions of dollars to fund the government.Keypoint: Cannabis is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It has too many bad side effects so should not be legalKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing marijuana boosts the economy and increases tax revenue.Keypoint: Cannabis is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is a dangerous drug and encourages crimeKeypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize cannabis for health purposesKeypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By legalizing cannabis you are making it easier to get a hold of, which then encourages younger adults/teenagers to start smoking & become addictedKeypoint: Legal cannabis can be getting to the hand of underage teenagers/children", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is a harmful and addictive drug that has a high risk of causing long term health problems including serious mental illness, it should never be made legal.Keypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing cannabis will just lead many people to experiment with other more dangerous drugsKeypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: So many people already use cannabis that the only real difference legalizing would make would be that the profits could be taxed.Keypoint: Cannabis is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize a dangerous drug, it gives it a stamp of approval and this is an irresponsible message to send to youthKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis has proven to be a better alternative to opioids in the management of pain. it is a natural plant and should be legal.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize cannabis as it may help with medical complaints that other medications have failedKeypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize cannabis because it helps many people that have painKeypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis can cause impaired driving and can be difficult to regulateKeypoint: Cannabis increases lack-of-judgement/accidents", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is less dangerous than other things which are currently legal, such as alcohol and cigarettes. it also has many medical usesKeypoint: If cannabis was legalized it could be regulated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't legalize cannabis because it will make the younger crowd think drugs aren't as bad as they are told and could lead them to experimenting with other drugs and creating a drug addictionKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is a holistic and natural cure for cancer patients and should therefore be legalizedKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis can provide relief for a number of ailments without the side effects of regular medications.Keypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is a useful medicinal plant which people should be able to use legally.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalising cannabis would take the trade out of the hands of criminal gangsKeypoint: Legalizing cannabis will reduce black-market/criminal activity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis can be used for a number of medical issues so making it legal will help with thatKeypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't legalize cannabis as it could lead to an addiction of other, more addictive drugs which could then lead to turning to crime as a way of getting hold of those drugsKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis can relieve the spasticity of the muscles that is sometimes associated with multiple sclerosis and paralysisKeypoint: Cannabis is safe/healthy/pain-relief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Because cannabis helps regulate body weight, it only makes sense that it would help prevent and regulate diabetes.Keypoint: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs yet remain legal", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize cannabis, it is a gateway drug and causes psychosis and paranoiaKeypoint: Cannabis harms the body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing it would eliminate the black market for cannabis and will also free up prisons of people who are arrested and sentenced for cannabis possession.Keypoint: Legalizing cannabis will reduce black-market/criminal activity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Cannabis is a gateway drug to other more harmful drugs such as heroin.Keypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - } - ] -} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/tasks/task1301_kpa_keypoint_matching_prostitution_topic.json b/tasks/task1301_kpa_keypoint_matching_prostitution_topic.json deleted file mode 100644 index fc6b8226b..000000000 --- a/tasks/task1301_kpa_keypoint_matching_prostitution_topic.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2632 +0,0 @@ -{ - "Contributors": [ - "Arjun Ashok" - ], - "Source": [ - "ArgKP (https://github.com/IBM/KPA_2021_shared_task)" - ], - "Definition": "The input contains an argument and a keypoint on the topic \"We should legalize prostitution\", separated by \"\".Your task is to answer if the keypoint matches the argument and summarizes exactly what the argument means, in the context of this topic.", - "Categories": [ - "Classification -> Verification -> Summary Verification", - "Text Comparison" - ], - "Domains": [ - "Reviews", - "Law", - "Government and Politics", - "Dialogue" - ], - "Input_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Output_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Instruction_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Positive Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitutes will now have legal protection against abuse, trafficking, and diseasesKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for the workers", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that prostitutes will now have legal protection against abuse, trafficking, and diseases." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is immoral and leads to a public health problemKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that prostitution is immoral and leads to a public health problem. Instead, it points out that it leads to illegal activities." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is the oldest profession and will never go away. making it legal can help to make it safer.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument about prostitution being an old profession. Instead, it refers to a boost in economy." - } - ], - "Negative Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: There are different types of prostitution, not all is abusive and exploitative. a regulated industry based upon freedom of choice is a positive liberation and safer than the situation todayKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument correctly, so the answer should be True." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are different types of prostitution, not all is abusive and exploitative. a regulated industry based upon freedom of choice is a positive liberation and safer than the situation todayKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that there are different types of prostitution, not all is abusive and exploitative. " - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution needs to remain illegal as it is not fair to a woman to have to sell their bodies in order to make a decent wage.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that it is not fair to a woman to have to sell their bodies in order to make a decent wage. So the correct answer is False." - } - ], - "Instances": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would prevent exploitation and trafficking of sex workersKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution spreads sex diseases.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize prostitution so that we can regulate it and make it safer for the prostitutes and the clients.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize prostitution because they spread too many deceases so we need to get rid of prostitutionKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is the 'oldest profession', it is not going any where. so rather than ignore it, we should legalize it so sex workers are less vulnerable to drug addiction and violence.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution gives prostitutes less value to pimps and human trafficking, which decreases human trafficking and weakens cartels over all - creating over flow benefits in decreasing drug trafficking.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution will make it easier for dangerous pimps and human trafficking rings to hide their unsavory practices behind a legal cover.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is an unsafe industry that puts women in harms way and should be kept illegal for their safetyKeypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution should not be legalized as it is an unclean professionKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase violence against women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution should be legal as women should be able to use their bodies however they like.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution has correlations to organized crime, especially human trafficking. this casts doubt on a prostitute's consent.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution could provide a valuable source of tax revenue if it was legalized.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work increases sex workers' benefits (e.g. health care, safe sex, unionization, etc.)", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize prostitution because they spread too many diseasesKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is immoral and encourages cheatingKeypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalising prostitution will ensure the safety of both the sex trade worker and clientKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would mean it could be made saferKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution could be better regulated and made saferKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize prostitution because it is going to happen no matter what, so allow it legally so the women can be safe and get the proper care needed in this profession.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize prostitution so that we can regulate it and make it safer for the prostitutes and the clients.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will allow to regulate those in the profession ", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution promotes human trafficking. it makes it impossible to investigate traffickers and help victims if they appear to be operating in a legal profession, allowing trafficking to flourish.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize prostitution that way the prostitutes have federal laws that ensure that they have a safe working environment since prostituting is a dangerous profession that can lead to death.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will allow to regulate those in the profession ", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution goes against everything we believe in as a nationKeypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The freedom of choice should be protected, legalizing prostitution is a way of empowering woman to choose what to do with their body and respecting their freedom to do so.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is going to happen anyway, legalizing would make it saferKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution happens; legalizing it would make it saferKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is inherently dangerous to women. they are treated harshly and without respect. they are also subjected to deadly diseasesKeypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should have the right to do whatever they would like to with their bodies in private.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution could be better regulated and made saferKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalization of prostitution would allow regulation and provide safe environmentsKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalization would allow for regulations that can help protect the safety of the workers as well as allowing for financial recognition and regulation.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't because it will dangerous profession and it shouldn't be encouraged.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase violence against women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution should be legalied so women can work in safe spaces rather than be at risk working on the streetsKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would increase global human trafficking and violent crime.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize prostitution because they spread too many deceases so we need to get rid of prostitutionKeypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution will continue regardless, legalization woueld make it safer.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitutes will now have legal protection against abuse, trafficking, and diseasesKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize prostitution because it is a victimless crime and many prostitutes enter the profession of their own free will.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize prostitution because they spread too many diseasesKeypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If prostitution was legal there would be less disease and related crimes.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is a major spread of disease and should not be legalized.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize prostitution since it is immoral and spreads disease if prostitution were completely stopped then so would the spread of dangerous std's.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalization would empower prostitutes to have healthier practices like condom use, since right now they are pressured out of it in part because they have no legal power.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalization would allow for regulations that can help protect the safety of the workers as well as allowing for financial recognition and regulation.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will allow to regulate those in the profession ", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize prostitution because it leads to secondary crime around the brothels, such as drug use.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A man or woman has the right to do what they wish with their body, and if they choose to sell it for sex, the government should not interfere.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalization of prostitution would allow regulation and provide safe environmentsKeypoint: Legalizing sex work increases sex workers' benefits (e.g. health care, safe sex, unionization, etc.)", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution gives women a choice about their bodies.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalising abuse does not stop the inherant abuse of women in the sex trade.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase violence against women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution is the only way to protect both customers and prostitutes from being exploited by criminalsKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution can protect those already in the business and become another source of income for those that is having a hard time finding workKeypoint: Legalizing sex work increases sex workers' benefits (e.g. health care, safe sex, unionization, etc.)", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize prostitution so that we can regulate it and make it safer for the prostitutes and the clients.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work increases sex workers' benefits (e.g. health care, safe sex, unionization, etc.)", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If women want to make money by selling their body and men wish to buy then they should be able to trade as they please.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is a legal right a woman inherently got from the constitution. a woman has the right to do as she wish with her bodyKeypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Selling sex, and paying for sex, are both immoral deeds.Keypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution will make it easier for dangerous pimps and human trafficking rings to hide their unsavory practices behind a legal cover.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution allows the profession to have some oversight and controls, thus making it safer for all involved.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would increase sexually transmitted diseases, human trafficking and violent crimeKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would make it safer for all.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution promotes human trafficking. it makes it impossible to investigate traffickers and help victims if they appear to be operating in a legal profession, allowing trafficking to flourish.Keypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By making prostitution legal, sex workers will be able to unionize and protect themselves from those who would exploit them.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By leagalizing prostitution, we remove most of the stigma associated with that lifestyle and make it safer. it's one of the oldest professions and should be respected and made legal.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is not right to legitimize something that is fundamentally immoral and hurts those who engage in itKeypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is a job choice for many women who should not be punished for finding a way to support themselves and their families.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will allow to regulate those in the profession ", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution will allow prostitutes to push for equitable contracts and conditions, something they can't do in the status quo since their work is illegal.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize prostitution because that way more prostitutes will take care of themselves medically so they won't catch or spread diseasesKeypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution allows people already illegally engaging in the industry to feel safer with their work as they are able to report bad clients to the authorities without fear of prosecutionKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A woman should have the right to sell her body in any way she deems acceptable.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would reduce crime and get prostitutes off the streets.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution could be better regulated and made saferKeypoint: Legalizing sex work increases sex workers' benefits (e.g. health care, safe sex, unionization, etc.)", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Rights to individual autonomy and privacy allow adults to make their own decisions and sexual activity is a private, individual choice that should not be subject to criminal penaltiesKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution will make it possible to regulate it so we could fight std's, underage prostitution and woman trafficking.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will allow to regulate those in the profession ", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution encourages exploitative families and friends to push women into prostitution for their own gain.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalising abuse does not stop the inherant abuse of women in the sex trade.Keypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution causes the spread of disease and crimeKeypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize prostitution so that workers can receive some protections and not be afraid of filing charges against abusive customers.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalized prostitution will prevent under age girls from being prostitutesKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will allow to regulate those in the profession ", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would allow prostitutes to seek protection from the police.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize prostitution because it will be regulated meaning the females will be saferKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution should be legal because it is a woman's choice. if made legal could be licensed and regulated for health and safety.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would allow for regulations and benefits that would help sex workers via offering protection with rights granted to legal employment as well as financial prosperity.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work increases sex workers' benefits (e.g. health care, safe sex, unionization, etc.)", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution ensures the workers to have adequate health check ups and protection from harm.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By legalizing prostitution we can regulate medical checkups and thereby help to prevent the spread of disease.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work increases sex workers' benefits (e.g. health care, safe sex, unionization, etc.)", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is the oldest profession and will never go away. making it legal can help to make it safer.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution should be allowed if the participants both agree.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution opens a door to a whole industry of sex traffickingKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If it is legalized it would make the women saferKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is a scourge on society and shouldn't be allowed to operate freely.Keypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize prostitution because it would lead to an increase in human trafficking of young women and girls.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution allows the profession to have some oversight and controls, thus making it safer for all involved.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution causes the spread of disease and crimeKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase violence against women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution will help countries budget and that money can be used in supporting so many causes in our society.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work increases sex workers' benefits (e.g. health care, safe sex, unionization, etc.)", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is a major spread of disease and should not be legalized.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution leads to abuse and human trafficing.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalization would empower prostitutes to have healthier practices like condom use, since right now they are pressured out of it in part because they have no legal power.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work increases sex workers' benefits (e.g. health care, safe sex, unionization, etc.)", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize prostitution because freedom should be absolute. if i wish to make money having sex, i should have that right. having it legal will reduce the violence and increase safety.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing would lead to regulations, making it more safe for all participantsKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize prostitution, it a horrible and demeaning occupation and should remain illegalKeypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize prostitution, it a horrible and demeaning occupation and should remain illegalKeypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitutes deserve the same rights as workers in any other trade.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would erode moral values and reduce the safety of women so it should never be legal.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution can be regulated and made safe if it was legalized.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would allow the government to regulate prostitution and make it safer.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is already taking place, and legalizing it would bring about healthier conditions for women. it would also lessen violence.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalising prostitution might lead to better conditions and regulations to protect women.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution will always go on and it better that both client and sex worker feel comfortable about their rights and approaching the police should something go wrong.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't because it will dangerous profession and it shouldn't be encouraged.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize prostitution because that way more prostitutes will take care of themselves medically so they won't catch or spread diseasesKeypoint: Legalizing sex work increases sex workers' benefits (e.g. health care, safe sex, unionization, etc.)", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would reduce crime and get prostitutes off the streets.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution is necessary to protect the rights of sex workersKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize prostitution because it is a victimless crime and many prostitutes enter the profession of their own free will.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is the 'oldest profession', it is not going any where. so rather than ignore it, we should legalize it so sex workers are less vulnerable to drug addiction and violence.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should because people will always do it so at least this way it can be safer and more controlled for the woman.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Adults have the right to do what they want with their own bodiesKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is an inherently coercive and damaging profession that endangers women.Keypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalising prostitution could lead to more people becoming involved in organised crime.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution will make it possible to regulate it so we could fight std's, underage prostitution and woman trafficking.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By leagalizing prostitution, we remove most of the stigma associated with that lifestyle and make it safer. it's one of the oldest professions and should be respected and made legal.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize prostitution since it is immoral and spreads disease if prostitution were completely stopped then so would the spread of dangerous std's.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Being able to control prostitution will allow us to drastically reduce some crimes and better serve the health of the workers and prevent the spread of sex diseasesKeypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is inherently dangerous to women. they are treated harshly and without respect. they are also subjected to deadly diseasesKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is a dirty thing that allows for the possibility of mass spreading of disease. eliminating prostitution is not only the right thing to do but healthier for the world.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It sets a bad example for younger generation and takes them away from the ethics of the societyKeypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing would lead to regulations, making it more safe for all participantsKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will allow to regulate those in the profession ", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution ensures the workers to have adequate health check ups and protection from harm.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize prostitution because that way more prostitutes will take care of themselves medically so they won't catch or spread diseasesKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would lead to an increase of child abductions for the sex trade.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution should never be legalized. too much danger of spreading of diseases can happen, women can be seriously hurt or murdered, and it is gross seeing women selling themselves on the streetKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Would increase violence against women ans children.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase violence against women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution can spread disease and hurt the lives of a spouse. people should not try to make a profit to satisfy another's needs. it is a crime that cen lead to more serious crimes.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize prostitution because it will be regulated meaning the females will be saferKeypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would mean the government could raise taxes on the earnings. it would also mean that women struggling to feed and house families would be under less threat of prosecution.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution will make sex workers safer because they will no longer have to hide, be ruled by criminals or judged as ones.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution should never be legalized. too much danger of spreading of diseases can happen, women can be seriously hurt or murdered, and it is gross seeing women selling themselves on the streetKeypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution is necessary to protect the rights of sex workersKeypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is a job choice for many women who should not be punished for finding a way to support themselves and their families.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would encourage immoral behavior in our society.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is going to be practiced irrespective of its lawful status, and legalization would improve both safety standards and the health of the sex workers.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If women want to make money by selling their body and men wish to buy then they should be able to trade as they please.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution allows the profession to have some oversight and controls, thus making it safer for all involved.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalising prostitution could lead to more serious crimes such as women becoming involved in the drug trade or people trafficking.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would lead to increases in sexually transmitted diseases.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Very often prostitutes are the most vulnerable in society and have drug and alcohol problems. they need to be properly protected.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution should never be legalized. too much danger of spreading of diseases can happen, women can be seriously hurt or murdered, and it is gross seeing women selling themselves on the streetKeypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would safeguard the people who engage in the act, both the one giving the service and the one receivingKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is immoral and decriminalizing it won't change thatKeypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If legal, prostitution can be taxed, resulting in more money to fund social programs.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work increases sex workers' benefits (e.g. health care, safe sex, unionization, etc.)", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution should be legal as women should be able to use their bodies however they like.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If prostitution was legalized then the women in the profession would have legal recourse if they are treated badly by clients or those who employ them.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People are free to use their bodies anyway they want toKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would promote sex traffickingKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A woman should have the right to use her body however she wants to support herself.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution can serve as a front for human traffickingKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalize prostitution so sex workers don't have to continue to work in unsafe environmentsKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalized prostitution carries with it a whole host of detriments such as drug use, disease,cartel-level pimping as well as an explosion in volume. most employed are very young, as low as 14.Keypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would increase sexually transmitted diseases, human trafficking and violent crimeKeypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People committing rape could just leave money and claim that they paid for it and that it was legal and consentual.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase violence against women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The choice between what two consenting adults do is not up to the governmentKeypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution leads to more women getting raped, beaten , mentally abused and killed.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would increase global human trafficking and violent crime.Keypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize prostitution because freedom should be absolute. if i wish to make money having sex, i should have that right. having it legal will reduce the violence and increase safety.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution will allow prostitutes to actually report and press charges against problematic pimps and johns, something they can't do right now.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By making prostitution legal, sex workers will be able to unionize and protect themselves from those who would exploit them.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution will help countries budget and that money can be used in supporting so many causes in our society.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A woman that is okay with selling her body is going to do it anyway so might as well make it legal.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would allow for regulations and benefits that would help sex workers via offering protection with rights granted to legal employment as well as financial prosperity.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will allow to regulate those in the profession ", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution opens a door to a whole industry of sex traffickingKeypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A woman that is okay with selling her body is going to do it anyway so might as well make it legal.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is immoral and leads to a public health problemKeypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution should not be legalized as it is an unclean professionKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution isnt going anywhere. at least if it's legalized it would take the profession out of the hands of criminals and be safer for the women.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would safeguard the people who engage in the act, both the one giving the service and the one receivingKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution will continue regardless, legalization woueld make it safer.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Selling sex for money is immoral, and it is very dangerous especially when it is unregulated.Keypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize prostitution because it leads to secondary crime around the brothels, such as drug use.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would mean it could be made saferKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would only help the pimps. it would also increase demands and possibly human trafficking.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If someone, out of their own complete free will, wants to sell themselves sexually they should have the right to do so.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution isnt going anywhere. at least if it's legalized it would take the profession out of the hands of criminals and be safer for the women.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is inherently dangerous to women. they are treated harshly and without respect. they are also subjected to deadly diseasesKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase violence against women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalising prostitution may promote the spread of sexually transmitted diseases.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It will be a safer environment for women to make this legitimate choice to sell their companionship and sexual servicesKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution has the potential to increase sex traffickingKeypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution can be regulated and made safe if it was legalized.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work increases sex workers' benefits (e.g. health care, safe sex, unionization, etc.)", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would mean the government could raise taxes on the earnings. it would also mean that women struggling to feed and house families would be under less threat of prosecution.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is immoral and wrong and should not be allowedKeypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize prostitution as this would enable sex workers to have better healthcare, support and workers' rights.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution leads women to abusive and dangerous situations and should never be legalized.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution will make it possible to regulate it so we could fight std's, underage prostitution and woman trafficking.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalized prostitution carries with it a whole host of detriments such as drug use, disease,cartel-level pimping as well as an explosion in volume. most employed are very young, as low as 14.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase violence against women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution should be allowed if the participants both agree.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would prevent exploitation and trafficking of sex workersKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution leads to more women getting raped, beaten , mentally abused and killed.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase violence against women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would erode moral values and reduce the safety of women so it should never be legal.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize prostitution because the prostitutes spread diseases, therefore, we need to get them off the streets and keep it illegalKeypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would promote sex traffickingKeypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is going to be practiced irrespective of its lawful status, and legalization would improve both safety standards and the health of the sex workers.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution can protect those already in the business and become another source of income for those that is having a hard time finding workKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is a scourge on society and shouldn't be allowed to operate freely.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We allow people to sell their eggs and sperm. we should allow people to sell the use of their penises and vaginas.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By legalizing prostitution we can regulate medical checkups and thereby help to prevent the spread of disease.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Very often prostitutes are the most vulnerable in society and have drug and alcohol problems. they need to be properly protected.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution should never be legalized. too much danger of spreading of diseases can happen, women can be seriously hurt or murdered, and it is gross seeing women selling themselves on the streetKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase violence against women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution will legitimize it as a profession and allow workers to unionize and collect benefitsKeypoint: Legalizing sex work increases sex workers' benefits (e.g. health care, safe sex, unionization, etc.)", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing would lead to regulations, making it more safe for all participantsKeypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When sex work is treated as criminal behavior sex workers cannot rely on support or protection from the policeKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is going to happen anyway, legalizing would make it saferKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is immoral and leads to a public health problemKeypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize prostitution because freedom should be absolute. if i wish to make money having sex, i should have that right. having it legal will reduce the violence and increase safety.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If prostitution was legal it would give prostitutes a lot more protection.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution causes the spread of disease and crimeKeypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If prostitution was legal it would give prostitutes a lot more protection.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution gives women a choice about their bodies.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would allow for medical care for all involved.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be able to do what they want with their bodies. by bringing it out in the open it will be far safer.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalising prostitution might lead to better conditions and regulations to protect women.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution gives another option for work and protect those already in itKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If prostitution were legal, there could be more government regulation. that regulation would allow for less disease and less human trafficking.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It would increase tax dollars & help the economy as it would be regulatedKeypoint: Legalizing sex work increases sex workers' benefits (e.g. health care, safe sex, unionization, etc.)", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: More people could consider it a viable choice of job if it's seen as legal which is morally corrupt.Keypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution allows the profession to have some oversight and controls, thus making it safer for all involved.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will allow to regulate those in the profession ", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is a job choice for many women who should not be punished for finding a way to support themselves and their families.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It would increase tax dollars & help the economy as it would be regulatedKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legitimate prostitutes as in those not forced into the trade are hurting no one and simply providing pleasure at a cost. pleasure that some people can't get obtain any other way.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution should be legalied so women can work in safe spaces rather than be at risk working on the streetsKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would only help the pimps. it would also increase demands and possibly human trafficking.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Being able to control prostitution will allow us to drastically reduce some crimes and better serve the health of the workers and prevent the spread of sex diseasesKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would spread many diseases.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would allow prostitutes to seek protection from the police.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be free to do with their bodies as they wishKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If legal, prostitution can be taxed, resulting in more money to fund social programs.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize prostitution since it is immoral and spreads disease if prostitution were completely stopped then so would the spread of dangerous std's.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase violence against women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People committing rape could just leave money and claim that they paid for it and that it was legal and consentual.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution promotes violent crimes against women.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is immoral and decriminalizing it won't change thatKeypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution can spread disease and hurt the lives of a spouse. people should not try to make a profit to satisfy another's needs. it is a crime that cen lead to more serious crimes.Keypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution can be regulated and made safe if it was legalized.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It allows control of the industry including paying of taxes and checks for stisKeypoint: Legalizing sex work increases sex workers' benefits (e.g. health care, safe sex, unionization, etc.)", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It can protect women from abuse and violence as they will be able to seek help if prostitution is legalizedKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is going to be practiced irrespective of its lawful status, and legalization would improve both safety standards and the health of the sex workers.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work increases sex workers' benefits (e.g. health care, safe sex, unionization, etc.)", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution can protect those already in the business and become another source of income for those that is having a hard time finding workKeypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalized prostitution will prevent under age girls from being prostitutesKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution will make sex workers safer because they will no longer have to hide, be ruled by criminals or judged as ones.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When sex work is treated as criminal behavior sex workers cannot rely on support or protection from the policeKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalization would allow for regulations that can help protect the safety of the workers as well as allowing for financial recognition and regulation.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution will cause a more dangerous environment for those trying to escape and will make sex trafficking more commonKeypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Rights to individual autonomy and privacy allow adults to make their own decisions and sexual activity is a private, individual choice that should not be subject to criminal penaltiesKeypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution is the only way to protect both customers and prostitutes from being exploited by criminalsKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalising prostitution might lead to better conditions and regulations to protect women.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will allow to regulate those in the profession ", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize prostitution because it will be regulated meaning the females will be saferKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Selling sex, and paying for sex, are both immoral deeds.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is a legal right a woman inherently got from the constitution. a woman has the right to do as she wish with her bodyKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When sex work is treated as criminal behavior sex workers cannot rely on support or protection from the policeKeypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is an unsafe industry that puts women in harms way and should be kept illegal for their safetyKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase violence against women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is immoral and leads to a public health problemKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase violence against women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If prostitution was legal there would be less disease and related crimes.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It allows control of the industry including paying of taxes and checks for stisKeypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution can be regulated and made safe if it was legalized.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize prostitution. it is not right for women or men to make a living by having sex. it will lead to a society in which marriages fall apart and children are harmed in the process.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution promotes human trafficking. it makes it impossible to investigate traffickers and help victims if they appear to be operating in a legal profession, allowing trafficking to flourish.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would lead to an increase of child abductions for the sex trade.Keypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution leads to abuse and human trafficing.Keypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The choice between what two consenting adults do is not up to the governmentKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is degrading and inhuman. it is a way of commodifying people and treating them as no more than merchandise.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution goes against everything we believe in as a nationKeypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution should be legal because it is a woman's choice. if made legal could be licensed and regulated for health and safety.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will allow to regulate those in the profession ", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalising prostitution will ensure the safety of both the sex trade worker and clientKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is linked to many rapes, molestation and murders of young women.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase violence against women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is already taking place, and legalizing it would bring about healthier conditions for women. it would also lessen violence.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize prostitution so that we can regulate it and make it safer for the prostitutes and the clients.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is immoral and wrong and should not be allowedKeypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalising prostitution might lead to better conditions and regulations to protect women.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should because people will always do it so at least this way it can be safer and more controlled for the woman.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize prostitution because it leads to secondary crime around the brothels, such as drug use.Keypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalising abuse does not stop the inherant abuse of women in the sex trade.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Banning prostitution is must for all of us who cares about moral and dignity of women.Keypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The legalization of prostitution would allow the people involved to be much safer since they would be able to rely on the protection of the policeKeypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is immoral and encourages cheatingKeypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The legalization of prostitution would allow the people involved to be much safer since they would be able to rely on the protection of the policeKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution will allow prostitutes to actually report and press charges against problematic pimps and johns, something they can't do right now.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Banning prostitution is must for all of us who cares about moral and dignity of women.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution could be better regulated and made saferKeypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If prostitution were legal, there could be more government regulation. that regulation would allow for less disease and less human trafficking.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will allow to regulate those in the profession ", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalization of prostitution would allow regulation and provide safe environmentsKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will allow to regulate those in the profession ", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If it is legalized it would make the women saferKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The freedom of choice should be protected, legalizing prostitution is a way of empowering woman to choose what to do with their body and respecting their freedom to do so.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize prostitution because it is going to happen no matter what, so allow it legally so the women can be safe and get the proper care needed in this profession.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't because it will dangerous profession and it shouldn't be encouraged.Keypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution sends the message that prostitution is okay, but it is not. prostitution is just the tip of the iceberg of human trafficking and abuse. it should not be condoned.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is an inherently coercive and damaging profession that endangers women.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution will legitimize it as a profession and allow workers to unionize and collect benefitsKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize prostitution so that we can regulate it and make it safer for the prostitutes and the clients.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be able to do what they want with their bodies. by bringing it out in the open it will be far safer.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is an inherently coercive and damaging profession that endangers women.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase violence against women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would allow for regulations and benefits that would help sex workers via offering protection with rights granted to legal employment as well as financial prosperity.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is linked to many rapes, molestation and murders of young women.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution spreads sex diseases.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Bodily autonomy is a fundamental right, and prostitution is just a way of exercising it. therefore it must be legalized.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We allow people to sell their eggs and sperm. we should allow people to sell the use of their penises and vaginas.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalising prostitution could lead to more serious crimes such as women becoming involved in the drug trade or people trafficking.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be free to do with their bodies as they wishKeypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would lead to an increase of child abductions for the sex trade.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would make the profession less dangerous and less hazardous to one's health.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalization would allow for regulations that can help protect the safety of the workers as well as allowing for financial recognition and regulation.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By making prostitution legal, sex workers will be able to unionize and protect themselves from those who would exploit them.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution will cause a more dangerous environment for those trying to escape and will make sex trafficking more commonKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase violence against women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution promotes violent crimes against women.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase violence against women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would be beneficial for the government because will increase the tax money and will be helpful in resolving issues in society.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work increases sex workers' benefits (e.g. health care, safe sex, unionization, etc.)", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution leads women to abusive and dangerous situations and should never be legalized.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase violence against women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are different types of prostitution, not all is abusive and exploitative. a regulated industry based upon freedom of choice is a positive liberation and safer than the situation todayKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will allow to regulate those in the profession ", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women consent into this profession and have the right to earn a living however they wish.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would provide safety measures to protect women who might end up in violent situations.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It can protect women from abuse and violence as they will be able to seek help if prostitution is legalizedKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If prostitution were legal, there could be more government regulation. that regulation would allow for less disease and less human trafficking.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing would lead to regulations, making it more safe for all participantsKeypoint: Legalizing sex work increases sex workers' benefits (e.g. health care, safe sex, unionization, etc.)", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution allows people already illegally engaging in the industry to feel safer with their work as they are able to report bad clients to the authorities without fear of prosecutionKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize prostitution because it is going to happen no matter what, so allow it legally so the women can be safe and get the proper care needed in this profession.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work increases sex workers' benefits (e.g. health care, safe sex, unionization, etc.)", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize prostitution because the prostitutes spread diseases, therefore, we need to get them off the streets and keep it illegalKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize prostitution that way the prostitutes have federal laws that ensure that they have a safe working environment since prostituting is a dangerous profession that can lead to death.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It will be a safer environment for women to make this legitimate choice to sell their companionship and sexual servicesKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A woman should have the right to use her body however she wants to support herself.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is a dirty thing that allows for the possibility of mass spreading of disease. eliminating prostitution is not only the right thing to do but healthier for the world.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution has existing since the beginning of civilisation and legalising it takes sex workers out of a legal grey area and can improve their safety and standardize working conditions.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalized prostitution will increase taxes collected from persons working in the industryKeypoint: Legalizing sex work increases sex workers' benefits (e.g. health care, safe sex, unionization, etc.)", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would strengthen the position of women - the best way to combat sexual violence.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize prostitution because freedom should be absolute. if i wish to make money having sex, i should have that right. having it legal will reduce the violence and increase safety.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work increases sex workers' benefits (e.g. health care, safe sex, unionization, etc.)", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution makes it safer and also means the services are taxed, generating more revenue.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It's a slippery slope. morally it gives the wrong message. next it will be seen as a career move.Keypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would allow the government to regulate prostitution and make it safer.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will allow to regulate those in the profession ", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize prostitution because it would lead to an increase in human trafficking of young women and girls.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution will always go on and it better that both client and sex worker feel comfortable about their rights and approaching the police should something go wrong.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would spread many diseases.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would be beneficial for the government because will increase the tax money and will be helpful in resolving issues in society.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is a disgraceful trade and should remain banned in all areas.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If prostitution was legalized then the women in the profession would have legal recourse if they are treated badly by clients or those who employ them.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitutes deserve the same rights as workers in any other trade.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work increases sex workers' benefits (e.g. health care, safe sex, unionization, etc.)", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution is necessary to protect the rights of sex workersKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution makes it safer and also means the services are taxed, generating more revenue.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize prostitution because that way more prostitutes will take care of themselves medically so they won't catch or spread diseasesKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize prostitution that way the prostitutes have federal laws that ensure that they have a safe working environment since prostituting is a dangerous profession that can lead to death.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution will allow prostitutes to push for equitable contracts and conditions, something they can't do in the status quo since their work is illegal.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work increases sex workers' benefits (e.g. health care, safe sex, unionization, etc.)", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A woman should have the right to sell her body in any way she deems acceptable.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would make it safer for all.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalize prostitution so sex workers don't have to continue to work in unsafe environmentsKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would allow for medical care for all involved.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work increases sex workers' benefits (e.g. health care, safe sex, unionization, etc.)", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalization of prostitution would allow regulation and provide safe environmentsKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution should be legal because it is a woman's choice. if made legal could be licensed and regulated for health and safety.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution will cause a more dangerous environment for those trying to escape and will make sex trafficking more commonKeypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize prostitution because freedom should be absolute. if i wish to make money having sex, i should have that right. having it legal will reduce the violence and increase safety.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will allow to regulate those in the profession ", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would strengthen the position of women - the best way to combat sexual violence.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution could provide a valuable source of tax revenue if it was legalized.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would encourage immoral behavior in our society.Keypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It allows control of the industry including paying of taxes and checks for stisKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will allow to regulate those in the profession ", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It's a slippery slope. morally it gives the wrong message. next it will be seen as a career move.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If someone, out of their own complete free will, wants to sell themselves sexually they should have the right to do so.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would provide safety measures to protect women who might end up in violent situations.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would mean the government could raise taxes on the earnings. it would also mean that women struggling to feed and house families would be under less threat of prosecution.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work increases sex workers' benefits (e.g. health care, safe sex, unionization, etc.)", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution needs to remain illegal as it is not fair to a woman to have to sell their bodies in order to make a decent wage.Keypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Would increase violence against women ans children.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would lead to increases in sexually transmitted diseases.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitutes will now have legal protection against abuse, trafficking, and diseasesKeypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution happens; legalizing it would make it saferKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution could be better regulated and made saferKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will allow to regulate those in the profession ", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is not right to legitimize something that is fundamentally immoral and hurts those who engage in itKeypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Selling sex for money is immoral, and it is very dangerous especially when it is unregulated.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we legalize and regulate prostitution then it will be safer for everyone and also generate revenue for the state.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work increases sex workers' benefits (e.g. health care, safe sex, unionization, etc.)", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution sends the message that prostitution is okay, but it is not. prostitution is just the tip of the iceberg of human trafficking and abuse. it should not be condoned.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution is necessary to protect the rights of sex workersKeypoint: Legalizing sex work increases sex workers' benefits (e.g. health care, safe sex, unionization, etc.)", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalization of prostitution would allow regulation and provide safe environmentsKeypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution leads to abuse and human trafficing.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Being able to control prostitution will allow us to drastically reduce some crimes and better serve the health of the workers and prevent the spread of sex diseasesKeypoint: Legalizing sex work increases sex workers' benefits (e.g. health care, safe sex, unionization, etc.)", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A man or woman has the right to do what they wish with their body, and if they choose to sell it for sex, the government should not interfere.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalized prostitution will increase taxes collected from persons working in the industryKeypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legitimate prostitutes as in those not forced into the trade are hurting no one and simply providing pleasure at a cost. pleasure that some people can't get obtain any other way.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would encourage immoral behavior in our society.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase violence against women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would make the profession less dangerous and less hazardous to one's health.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we legalize and regulate prostitution then it will be safer for everyone and also generate revenue for the state.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution has existing since the beginning of civilisation and legalising it takes sex workers out of a legal grey area and can improve their safety and standardize working conditions.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Bodily autonomy is a fundamental right, and prostitution is just a way of exercising it. therefore it must be legalized.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize prostitution so that workers can receive some protections and not be afraid of filing charges against abusive customers.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution encourages exploitative families and friends to push women into prostitution for their own gain.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we legalize and regulate prostitution then it will be safer for everyone and also generate revenue for the state.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women have free will, and they choose to work and earn a (good) living as prostitutes. we don't have a right to withhold it from them.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalising prostitution could lead to more people becoming involved in organised crime.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is a disgraceful trade and should remain banned in all areas.Keypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize prostitution as this would enable sex workers to have better healthcare, support and workers' rights.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work increases sex workers' benefits (e.g. health care, safe sex, unionization, etc.)", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution has existing since the beginning of civilisation and legalising it takes sex workers out of a legal grey area and can improve their safety and standardize working conditions.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would allow the government to regulate prostitution and make it safer.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution should not be legalized as it is an unclean professionKeypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalized prostitution carries with it a whole host of detriments such as drug use, disease,cartel-level pimping as well as an explosion in volume. most employed are very young, as low as 14.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If prostitution was legalized then the women in the profession would have legal recourse if they are treated badly by clients or those who employ them.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should have the right to do whatever they would like to with their bodies in private.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would make the profession less dangerous and less hazardous to one's health.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would allow for regulations and benefits that would help sex workers via offering protection with rights granted to legal employment as well as financial prosperity.Keypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize prostitution that way the prostitutes have federal laws that ensure that they have a safe working environment since prostituting is a dangerous profession that can lead to death.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing would lead to regulations, making it more safe for all participantsKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: More people could consider it a viable choice of job if it's seen as legal which is morally corrupt.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution can be regulated and made safe if it was legalized.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will allow to regulate those in the profession ", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women have free will, and they choose to work and earn a (good) living as prostitutes. we don't have a right to withhold it from them.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Selling sex for money is immoral, and it is very dangerous especially when it is unregulated.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People are free to use their bodies anyway they want toKeypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It sets a bad example for younger generation and takes them away from the ethics of the societyKeypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize prostitution. it is not right for women or men to make a living by having sex. it will lead to a society in which marriages fall apart and children are harmed in the process.Keypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution gives prostitutes less value to pimps and human trafficking, which decreases human trafficking and weakens cartels over all - creating over flow benefits in decreasing drug trafficking.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalization would empower prostitutes to have healthier practices like condom use, since right now they are pressured out of it in part because they have no legal power.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize prostitution because that way more prostitutes will take care of themselves medically so they won't catch or spread diseasesKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will allow to regulate those in the profession ", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is going to be practiced irrespective of its lawful status, and legalization would improve both safety standards and the health of the sex workers.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will allow to regulate those in the profession ", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution can serve as a front for human traffickingKeypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution makes it safer and also means the services are taxed, generating more revenue.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution has correlations to organized crime, especially human trafficking. this casts doubt on a prostitute's consent.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution has the potential to increase sex traffickingKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize prostitution because it is going to happen no matter what, so allow it legally so the women can be safe and get the proper care needed in this profession.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution sends the message that prostitution is okay, but it is not. prostitution is just the tip of the iceberg of human trafficking and abuse. it should not be condoned.Keypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution ensures the workers to have adequate health check ups and protection from harm.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work increases sex workers' benefits (e.g. health care, safe sex, unionization, etc.)", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is going to be practiced irrespective of its lawful status, and legalization would improve both safety standards and the health of the sex workers.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would increase global human trafficking and violent crime.Keypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution can spread disease and hurt the lives of a spouse. people should not try to make a profit to satisfy another's needs. it is a crime that cen lead to more serious crimes.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase violence against women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalization would empower prostitutes to have healthier practices like condom use, since right now they are pressured out of it in part because they have no legal power.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will allow to regulate those in the profession ", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women consent into this profession and have the right to earn a living however they wish.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work boosts the economy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution is inherently dangerous to women. they are treated harshly and without respect. they are also subjected to deadly diseasesKeypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would increase sexually transmitted diseases, human trafficking and violent crimeKeypoint: Legalization will lead to more sexually transmitted diseases", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalization would empower prostitutes to have healthier practices like condom use, since right now they are pressured out of it in part because they have no legal power.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prostitution will cause a more dangerous environment for those trying to escape and will make sex trafficking more commonKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Adults have the right to do what they want with their own bodiesKeypoint: Sex work is a valid choice over your body", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would erode moral values and reduce the safety of women so it should never be legal.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase violence against women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalising prostitution may promote the spread of sexually transmitted diseases.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will increase immoral behaviour like pimping/organized crime/trafficking", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would erode moral values and reduce the safety of women so it should never be legal.Keypoint: Selling one's body is immoral", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing prostitution would allow the government to regulate prostitution and make it safer.Keypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The legalization of prostitution would allow the people involved to be much safer since they would be able to rely on the protection of the policeKeypoint: Legalizing sex work will make the profession safer for women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - } - ] -} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/tasks/task1302_kpa_keypoint_matching_sex_selection_topic.json b/tasks/task1302_kpa_keypoint_matching_sex_selection_topic.json deleted file mode 100644 index 9d4ddb0d5..000000000 --- a/tasks/task1302_kpa_keypoint_matching_sex_selection_topic.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2662 +0,0 @@ -{ - "Contributors": [ - "Arjun Ashok" - ], - "Source": [ - "ArgKP (https://github.com/IBM/KPA_2021_shared_task)" - ], - "Definition": "The input contains an argument and a keypoint on the topic \"We should legalize sex selection\", separated by \"\".Your task is to answer if the keypoint matches the argument and summarizes exactly what the argument means, in the context of this topic.", - "Categories": [ - "Classification -> Verification -> Summary Verification", - "Text Comparison" - ], - "Domains": [ - "Reviews", - "Law", - "Government and Politics", - "Dialogue" - ], - "Input_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Output_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Instruction_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Positive Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection will increase abortionsKeypoint: Sex selection will create abortions/infanticide", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that sex selection will increase abortions" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Pre-selecting your baby's sex is a form of gender discrimination.Keypoint: Sex selection reaffirms gender stereotypes/biases", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that pre-selecting your baby's sex is a form of gender discrimination." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection will have troublesome effects on gender disparity.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that sex selection will have troublesome effects on gender disparity." - } - ], - "Negative Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Absolutely supporting legalizing sex selection as some parents not able to have male or female kids so having a choice to choose the gender of next kid is absolutely amazing.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that absolutely supporting legalizing sex selection as some parents not able to have male or female kids so having a choice to choose the gender of next kid is absolutely amazing." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection should not be legalized as it isnt ethical its going against the natural course of lifeKeypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that sex selection should not be legalized as it isnt ethical its going against the natural course of life" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection should be legalized because it gives couples the options to plan a familyKeypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that sex selection should be legalized because it gives couples the options to plan a family" - } - ], - "Instances": [ - { - "input": "Argument: There will be an imbalance if one sex is continuously chosen over anotherKeypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Allowing couples to choose the gender of their child makes for happier families.Keypoint: Sex selection makes the family more happy/complete", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Selecting the sex of babies could lead to an in balance in society demonstrated by china , where the one child policy resulted in areas where there are approximately 10 males to 1 female.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection should be legalized as it should be the parents choice a couple may have three boys and want a girlKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalised sex selection will cause a damaging shift in the usual 50:50 demographic split between men and womenKeypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection is parents playing god with science and nature and should not be alllowed.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection may lead to discrimination and further sexism in society, especially in areas where female babies are already looked on as lesser.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Its unnatural. you shouldn't have the right or ability to choose or abort based solely on sex. this can lead to complete disproportionate numbers if people decide to favor one sex over the other.Keypoint: Sex selection is expensive", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People shouldn't be allowed to play godKeypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection does not hurt anybody so people should have the freedom to choose the sex of their childKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be able to choose the sex of children if they want toKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize sex selection as people have every right to chose the sex of the child they wish to raise.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize sex selection as everyone should have the right to determine the sex of their children.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection should be legalized because it gives couples the options to plan a familyKeypoint: Sex selection will prevent abortions/infanticide", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection should be a constitutional right of a parentKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalise sex selection because in countries where everyone wants a male child, can cause massive problems to the country.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection (for non medical reasons) is unethical.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Since the parents create the fetus, they should be entitled to choose it's sexKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing sex selection will help parents to have the exact family makeup they have always dreamed of.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection should be legalised for parents who wish to choose the sex of their child. it is no one else's business but their own.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: For those who have a genetic disorder linked to the sex of the child preventing the birth of a child with a serious illness and to prevent abuse and neglect of or treatment of a child of the unwanted gender.Keypoint: Sex selection prevents diseases in the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalising sex selection will gradually create harmful gender imbalances - harmful in the short term due to negative value stereotypes that could be attribute to a particular sex, and long term to birth rates.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection can allow for stable families to be formedKeypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection is all normal. parents should be free to choose which of a son or a daughter they want to raiseKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Knowing the gender of your baby makes it easier to purchase items for the baby before its birth.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Most people believe that sex selection is immoral and unethical and leads to serious societal issues.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection should be a parent's choice.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When families are only permitted to have one child, it is important for parents to be able to select the sex of that child.Keypoint: Sex selection prevents diseases in the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing sex selection will help reduce the number of children who suffer from sex-linked genetic diseasesKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection can allow for stable families to be formedKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize sex selection because it will lead to an imbalance between men and women in society.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection permits an equal balance of children of each sex to be bornKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sec selection is a right parents have in the process of childbirthKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents should be able to choose what sex child they are going to have.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents should be able to plan out their family the way they please and that includes selecting the sex of their children, if possible.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection may cause an imbalance in genders in the general population.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents should be able to utilize any technological advances they wish in order to build their ideal family.Keypoint: Sex selection prevents diseases in the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Absolutely supporting legalizing sex selection as some parents not able to have male or female kids so having a choice to choose the gender of next kid is absolutely amazing.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Maximizing reproductive freedom includes sex selection.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection may cause an imbalance in genders in the general population.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection can allow for stable families to be formedKeypoint: Sex selection makes the family more happy/complete", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Behind the innocent phrase of\"sex selection\" there's actually medical procedures that could be harmfull for the mother, and in other cases means abortions, which are very controversial.Keypoint: Sex selection will create abortions/infanticide", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection allows for families to better match the unit that will better match their ideal family unitKeypoint: Sex selection prevents diseases in the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be able to chose the sex of their childKeypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents should have the right to make decisions about their own child.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize sex selection and leave mother nature to doing her job and not try to become god.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing sex selection will tip the population genders out of balanceKeypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't because that should be decided naturally.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Gender selection helps families balance the number of boys and girls in their family.Keypoint: Sex selection makes the family more happy/complete", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize sex selection because i think people should be able to pick if they want their child to be a boy or a girlKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection could cause more of one sex thus creating an imbalance.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The selection of sex is a valid option for couples who wish to take itKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing sex selection would be too costly, causing a surplus of one gender in just a couple decades time.Keypoint: Sex selection is against tradition", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It helps to insure that the parents get the gender of the child they want and will loveKeypoint: Sex selection will prevent abortions/infanticide", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection is playing god, will create gender imbalances and create negative stereotypes concerning male/female preferences.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalising sex selection will gradually create harmful gender imbalances - harmful in the short term due to negative value stereotypes that could be attribute to a particular sex, and long term to birth rates.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Pre-selecting your baby's sex is a form of gender discrimination.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection is unnatural and goes against the view that it is up to god to decide the child one will have.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection is unnatural and will have long term negative consequences on society. we will become overpopulated with male children and females will become targets of sexual crimes.Keypoint: Sex selection is against tradition", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is immoral & unnatural & should not be legalizedKeypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize sex selection as everyone should have the right to determine the sex of their children.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize sex selection because an imbalance of men and women will lead to more violence against women down the line as more young men are unable to find partners.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The selection of sex is a valid option for couples who wish to take itKeypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection might cause an excess of one sex to be born at a specific timeKeypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize sex selection because people should be able to pick the sex of the baby they want instead of having the sex forced on themKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Allowing sex selection may lead to a gender imbalance in the population causing problems for future generations.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize sex selection because it immoral to try and play god and decide what sex the baby will be. this will lead to more males than females in society which is a form of discriminationKeypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The selection of sex can help to overcome hereditary diseases that are typical of a specific sexKeypoint: Sex selection prevents diseases in the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection allows for closer relationships between parent and child when they get the sex of child they desireKeypoint: Sex selection makes the family more happy/complete", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If there's a scientific capability to do it - we have no right to stop people from having what they wantKeypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This is immoral and unnatural and goes against what nature intendedKeypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection should be a choice for parents to make and therefore should be legalized.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize sex selection because it might cause an unbalanced society.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This will lead to fewer unwanted children and improve parental satisfactionKeypoint: Sex selection makes the family more happy/complete", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize sex selection because it lets the family choose what kind of child they will haveKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Its unnatural. you shouldn't have the right or ability to choose or abort based solely on sex. this can lead to complete disproportionate numbers if people decide to favor one sex over the other.Keypoint: Sex selection is against tradition", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection will leave some countries with more males than females because certain countries value males more than femalesKeypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize sex selection because we should not be playing god.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The selection of sex can break the natural balance between males and femalesKeypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection strengthens sexist stereotypes and gender biases.Keypoint: Sex selection reaffirms gender stereotypes/biases", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It's a personal decision that should not be regulatedKeypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection should be allowed so that families can have children of the gender they desire without overpopulating in an attempt to gain the desires sex. selection would reduce births of an unwanted sex.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People shouldn't be allowed to play godKeypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There seems to be no harm to wanting to choose the sex of your baby, particularly if there are hereditary diseases which affect your family that could be stopped by choosing one sex over the other.Keypoint: Sex selection prevents diseases in the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection strengthens sexist stereotypes and gender biases.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection can cause an over abundance of one sex over the other.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection can prevent gender-specific diseases from being passed onto a baby.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are valid medical reasons for using sex selection to combat certain diseasesKeypoint: Sex selection prevents diseases in the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection is against nature and messes up the biological makings of the child for future harmKeypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex section could be useful in balancing the genders of a larger family, and surely parents can be afforded some degree of control?Keypoint: Sex selection prevents diseases in the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection permits an equal balance of children of each sex to be bornKeypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection can cause an over abundance of one sex over the other.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Allowing sex selection may lead to a gender imbalance in the population causing problems for future generations.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People's freedoms should be maximized as long as no one is harmed. therefore, a couple should have the freedom to choose the sex of its child.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize sex selection because it gives the parents a choice of choosing exactly the kind of family they wantKeypoint: Sex selection makes the family more happy/complete", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When families are only permitted to have one child, it is important for parents to be able to select the sex of that child.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing sex selection goes against the laws of natureKeypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize sex selection as this is enabling people to play god and may lead to the destabilisation of future generations e.g. more males than femalesKeypoint: Sex selection is against tradition", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Gender selection helps families balance the number of boys and girls in their family.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize sex selection and leave mother nature to doing her job and not try to become god.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize sex selection because no man should play god.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection might cause an excess of one sex to be born at a specific timeKeypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalized sex selection would help couples prepare for the birth of their babyKeypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize sex selection because it might cause an unbalanced society.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection is all normal. parents should be free to choose which of a son or a daughter they want to raiseKeypoint: Sex selection makes the family more happy/complete", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When people mess with mother nature by trying to select the sex of their child, only bad things can happen.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some parents may already have 2 boys and kept all of their clothes, etc. if they can chose to have another boy they will be able to save a large amount of money by not having to buy new gender specific items.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People's freedoms should be maximized as long as no one is harmed. therefore, a couple should have the freedom to choose the sex of its child.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection can lead to a serious gender imbalanceKeypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection can be used to help balance out families so that there aren't several kids of one gender.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalise sex selection because some genetic diseases can only be found in either man or females and if it runs in the family then it can give the child a chance to live a normal life.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Selecting the sex of your baby will mean perfectly healthy babies are aborted because the parents want to choose the sex, which surely must be morally corrupt.Keypoint: Sex selection will create abortions/infanticide", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This should be left up to the adults to decide since adults can make their own choicesKeypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we gave people the right to choose the sex we will have very few females in our world. they most likely would choose a boy. let god be the creator of the child and we should never intervene.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The third world already suffers from an imbalanced birth rate with more men than woman born. making it legally possible will worsen the problems we see today- difficulty to find a wife, restlessness and violence.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing sex selection will tip the population genders out of balanceKeypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize sex selection. if i want to have a baby girl, who has the right to deny me my wish? what if i had two boys already and don't want a third?Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection can be useful for a family to balance out their's; say a family has three boys, and wants a girl.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection is unethical and morally wrong - no child should be discarded because of their gender.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing sex selection will help parents to have the exact family makeup they have always dreamed of.Keypoint: Sex selection makes the family more happy/complete", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: With the $20,000 price tag on something that is not 100% accurate, sex selection is only made available to the wealthy.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection allows for families to better match the unit that will better match their ideal family unitKeypoint: Sex selection will prevent abortions/infanticide", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection allows for closer relationships between parent and child when they get the sex of child they desireKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection is a safe tool to help parents attain the family they dream of, thus should be legalizedKeypoint: Sex selection will prevent abortions/infanticide", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection reinforces a culture of male-dominated sexism and devalues women.Keypoint: Sex selection reaffirms gender stereotypes/biases", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It will result in more elective abortions and cause a gender imbalanceKeypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If all families decide to only select one sex then there will be an imbalance between the sexesKeypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Most people believe that sex selection is immoral and unethical and leads to serious societal issues.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection allows people to play god and can create an imbalance between sexes in the population as a wholeKeypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This will lead to fewer unwanted children and improve parental satisfactionKeypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection can possibly destroy the natural selection and over balance the society.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This could cause imbalance in population, if a generation is selected as mainly male or femaleKeypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Families have the right to use available technology to create the family they want.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection is immoral, and we should avoid using scientific tools in this way.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection is playing god, will create gender imbalances and create negative stereotypes concerning male/female preferences.Keypoint: Sex selection reaffirms gender stereotypes/biases", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Selecting sex might throw off the balance between male and female. many cultures value males over femalesKeypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection is against nature and messes up the biological makings of the child for future harmKeypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection may lead to discrimination and further sexism in society, especially in areas where female babies are already looked on as lesser.Keypoint: Sex selection reaffirms gender stereotypes/biases", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection leads to higher abortion ratesKeypoint: Sex selection will create abortions/infanticide", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection should be legalized as it should be the parents choice a couple may have three boys and want a girlKeypoint: Sex selection makes the family more happy/complete", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we allow sex selection it will be open to abuse by people who want to create their idea of the perfect family, aborting perfectly healthy babies for vanity.Keypoint: Sex selection is against tradition", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some serious genetic disorders which are linked to the sex of a child can be avoided if sex selection is allowedKeypoint: Sex selection prevents diseases in the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: What kind of society do we live in if people can murder their own child just because it is the \"wrong\" gender?Keypoint: Sex selection will create abortions/infanticide", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People being able to outwardly choose how they feel on the inside is importantKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection is against many religions and is offensive. people should not be playing god with the natural process of life.Keypoint: Sex selection is against tradition", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize sex selection as it is a parents right to choose and many families may want a girl after many boys and so sex selection will help ensure a wanted pregnancy.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection is a safe tool to help parents attain the family they dream of, thus should be legalizedKeypoint: Sex selection prevents diseases in the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It will result in more elective abortions and cause a gender imbalanceKeypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalising sex selection would cause an imbalance in the male to female ratio in the population leading to serious social problemsKeypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents have the right to select the sex of their childKeypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Countries that used sex selection, like china, now have a problem with two many older men and not enough women to marry them and have more children for the next generation.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is nothing wrong with a family wanting a specific sex when they have a child. this should be supported and families should be helped in any way to achieve their desired result.Keypoint: Sex selection makes the family more happy/complete", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection can be used to help balance out families so that there aren't several kids of one gender.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This is immoral and unnatural and goes against what nature intendedKeypoint: Sex selection is expensive", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not allow such an immoral thing that will more than likely fuel the inequality of genders by promoting men as more valuableKeypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalise sex selection because in countries where everyone wants a male child, can cause massive problems to the country.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize sex selection because it will lead to an imbalance between men and women in society.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing sex selection goes against the laws of natureKeypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be able to select the sex of the children so that they can balance their family the way they wish it to be.Keypoint: Sex selection will prevent abortions/infanticide", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize sex selection because it immoral to try and play god and decide what sex the baby will be. this will lead to more males than females in society which is a form of discriminationKeypoint: Sex selection is expensive", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The selection of sex is a private and personal decision of the parents and must be respectedKeypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: For some people the choice of sex is importantKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents should not play god and choose what kind of child they wantKeypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It`s wrong, just wrong to mess with god`s choice of baby sex selection. unborn kid is holly creatures and should not be disturbed.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There seems to be no harm to wanting to choose the sex of your baby, particularly if there are hereditary diseases which affect your family that could be stopped by choosing one sex over the other.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not be playing god. don't mess with nature.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If all families decide to only select one sex then there will be an imbalance between the sexesKeypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection can lead to societies where there are more men than women. this can mean that a lot of men cannot find a wife and are unhappy.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection allows for families to better match the unit that will better match their ideal family unitKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection can lead to a gender imbalance if one sex is favoured over the other. this can lead to a lack of suitable partners in the future and people being forced to lead a single life.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize sex selection because it should be up to people to make that choice. freedom of choice is vital in democracies and should be protected where possible.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sec selection is a right parents have in the process of childbirthKeypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Gender selection is an extremely expensive medical process.Keypoint: Sex selection is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There will be an imbalance if one sex is continuously chosen over anotherKeypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should be able to choose the sex we wish to have.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection goes against nature and god. we don't have a right to start changing the things that are just 'meant to be\".Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Allowing couples to choose the gender of their child makes for happier families.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize sex selection because people should have the right to pick if they want to raise a boy or a girlKeypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If people can afford it then it is their choiceKeypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection could lead to gender inbalance in some societies.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It helps to insure that the parents get the gender of the child they want and will loveKeypoint: Sex selection prevents diseases in the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This will lead to fewer unwanted children and improve parental satisfactionKeypoint: Sex selection prevents diseases in the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some serious genetic disorders which are linked to the sex of a child can be avoided if sex selection is allowedKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some parents may already have 2 boys and kept all of their clothes, etc. if they can chose to have another boy they will be able to save a large amount of money by not having to buy new gender specific items.Keypoint: Sex selection makes the family more happy/complete", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Its unnatural. you shouldn't have the right or ability to choose or abort based solely on sex. this can lead to complete disproportionate numbers if people decide to favor one sex over the other.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents should have the right to decide what gender of child they want.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance by distorting the natural male-female sex ratio.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Its unnatural. you shouldn't have the right or ability to choose or abort based solely on sex. this can lead to complete disproportionate numbers if people decide to favor one sex over the other.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We are breaking the law of nature if we allow sex selectionKeypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalise sex selection because some genetic diseases can only be found in either man or females and if it runs in the family then it can give the child a chance to live a normal life.Keypoint: Sex selection prevents diseases in the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a person decides that they are willing to raise and suppose another human being for 18 or more years, they should at least be able to decide what sex they want that person to be.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: In countries like china, where parents can only have one child, it is important to allow them to select the sex of their child.Keypoint: Sex selection makes the family more happy/complete", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The selection of sex can help to overcome hereditary diseases that are typical of a specific sexKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection has a bad side effect.. increased abortion.Keypoint: Sex selection will create abortions/infanticide", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex section could be useful in balancing the genders of a larger family, and surely parents can be afforded some degree of control?Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection allows parents to get the type of child they wish and prepare accordingly for their raising.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection should be allowed so that families can have children of the gender they desire without overpopulating in an attempt to gain the desires sex. selection would reduce births of an unwanted sex.Keypoint: Sex selection will prevent abortions/infanticide", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize sex selection because in regions where infanticide is practiced, this would make it unnecessary.Keypoint: Sex selection will prevent abortions/infanticide", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection is unnatural and will have long term negative consequences on society. we will become overpopulated with male children and females will become targets of sexual crimes.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents should be able to plan out their family the way they please and that includes selecting the sex of their children, if possible.Keypoint: Sex selection makes the family more happy/complete", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Not enough girls will be selected by sexist cultures which will result in social strain in future years.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection allows people to play god and can create an imbalance between sexes in the population as a wholeKeypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex section could be useful in balancing the genders of a larger family, and surely parents can be afforded some degree of control?Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection can possibly destroy the natural selection and over balance the society.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some illnesses are inherited by one gender or another, sex selection would enable these families to have a child without this illness, it would also result in fewer abortions of children who are the wrong sex.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection encourages gender discrimination, which is illegalKeypoint: Sex selection reaffirms gender stereotypes/biases", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection should be legalized because it gives couples the options to plan a familyKeypoint: Sex selection prevents diseases in the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a family has a child or multiple children of the same sex, sex selection allows for the family to insure they have a child of the opposite sex.Keypoint: Sex selection will prevent abortions/infanticide", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection is immoral and favors one sex over another.Keypoint: Sex selection is against tradition", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is against nature and could upset the balance of the population.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection would fulfill the dreams of many parents.Keypoint: Sex selection will prevent abortions/infanticide", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing sex selection is the right thing for personal freedom of choice.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Not enough girls will be selected by sexist cultures which will result in social strain in future years.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection is playing god, will create gender imbalances and create negative stereotypes concerning male/female preferences.Keypoint: Sex selection is against tradition", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing sex selection is the right thing for personal freedom of choice.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should be able to choose the sex we wish to have.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection is unnatural and goes against the view that it is up to god to decide the child one will have.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection can lead to a serious gender imbalanceKeypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be able to select the sex of the children so that they can balance their family the way they wish it to be.Keypoint: Sex selection makes the family more happy/complete", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is not ethical to decide the sex of the child because it violates the natural balance of thingsKeypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The third world already suffers from an imbalanced birth rate with more men than woman born. making it legally possible will worsen the problems we see today- difficulty to find a wife, restlessness and violence.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection leads to higher abortion ratesKeypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize sex selection because it gives the parents a choice of choosing exactly the kind of family they wantKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize sex selection because it lets the family choose what kind of child they will haveKeypoint: Sex selection prevents diseases in the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It`s wrong, just wrong to mess with god`s choice of baby sex selection. unborn kid is holly creatures and should not be disturbed.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection will increase abortionsKeypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This should be left up to the adults to decide since adults can make their own choicesKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Families deserve the right to choose the sex they are most comfortable raising.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection reinforces a culture of male-dominated sexism and devalues women.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize sex selection because it should be up to people to make that choice. freedom of choice is vital in democracies and should be protected where possible.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection should be legalised as in the right circumstances can avoid necessary pain and suffering for children who would be born with life limiting conditions.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It should not be legal, it is costly and morally wrongKeypoint: Sex selection is against tradition", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize sex selection as with all the developments in the world we should be allowed to choose the sex of our children.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If people can afford it then it is their choiceKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection allows parents to get the type of child they wish and prepare accordingly for their raising.Keypoint: Sex selection makes the family more happy/complete", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents should not play god and choose what kind of child they wantKeypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize sex selection. if i want to have a baby girl, who has the right to deny me my wish? what if i had two boys already and don't want a third?Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection is immoral and favors one sex over another.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: With the $20,000 price tag on something that is not 100% accurate, sex selection is only made available to the wealthy.Keypoint: Sex selection is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection should be allowed to those who want a certain gender.Keypoint: Sex selection makes the family more happy/complete", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalised sex selection will cause a damaging shift in the usual 50:50 demographic split between men and womenKeypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Families deserve the right to choose the sex they are most comfortable raising.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are some genetic disorders which affect only one gender; sex selection can save parents these consequences.Keypoint: Sex selection prevents diseases in the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing sex selection goes against all laws of nature.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection is immoral, and we should avoid using scientific tools in this way.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a person decides that they are willing to raise and suppose another human being for 18 or more years, they should at least be able to decide what sex they want that person to be.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be able to utilize new sciences as they please.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize sex selection because we should not be playing god.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection goes against nature and should not be legalized, it's like playing god.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It can lead to a gender imbalance in societyKeypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Behind the innocent phrase of\"sex selection\" there's actually medical procedures that could be harmfull for the mother, and in other cases means abortions, which are very controversial.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The right to bodily autonomy permits mothers to have abortions for sex selective purposesKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection has a bad side effect.. increased abortion.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Allow the selection of sex could alter the natural order of thingsKeypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection could lead to gender inbalance in some societies.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection would stop people having an abortion when they don't have the gender of child they wanted.Keypoint: Sex selection will prevent abortions/infanticide", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection goes against the morals of many christian beliefs and should not be allowed. we should not be playing god.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection should be allowed to those who want a certain gender.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: For some people the choice of sex is importantKeypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection (for non medical reasons) is unethical.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection can lead to societies where there are more men than women. this can mean that a lot of men cannot find a wife and are unhappy.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection is parents playing god with science and nature and should not be alllowed.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be able to choose the sex of children if they want toKeypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some illnesses are inherited by one gender or another, sex selection would enable these families to have a child without this illness, it would also result in fewer abortions of children who are the wrong sex.Keypoint: Sex selection prevents diseases in the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize sex selection because the parents are free to decide what gender they wantKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents should be able to choose what sex child they are going to have.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is not ethical to decide the sex of the child because it violates the natural balance of thingsKeypoint: Sex selection is against tradition", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection goes against the morals of many christian beliefs and should not be allowed. we should not be playing god.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection should be legal for parents to select the sex of the child. parents with all boys or all girls should have the choice of selecting the other sex.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing sex selection goes against all laws of nature.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection can allow for stable families to be formedKeypoint: Sex selection prevents diseases in the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is better to never be born than to be born to parents who do not want you, therefore, we should legalize sex selection.Keypoint: Sex selection will prevent abortions/infanticide", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are valid medical reasons for using sex selection to combat certain diseasesKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection will have devastating consequences for gender imbalance.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should have the freedom to choose the gender they want their baby to be.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing sex selection will help reduce the number of children who suffer from sex-linked genetic diseasesKeypoint: Sex selection prevents diseases in the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection will have devastating consequences for gender imbalance.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection leads to further harms against women. many families would choose to only have boys. the population would end up highly uneven and thrown into chaos.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection should be allowed so that families can have children of the gender they desire without overpopulating in an attempt to gain the desires sex. selection would reduce births of an unwanted sex.Keypoint: Sex selection makes the family more happy/complete", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The selection of sex is a private and personal decision of the parents and must be respectedKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize sex selection because in regions where infanticide is practiced, this would make it unnecessary.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize sex selection because it immoral to try and play god and decide what sex the baby will be. this will lead to more males than females in society which is a form of discriminationKeypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing medical sex selection can prevent the abortion of unwanted gendered babiesKeypoint: Sex selection will prevent abortions/infanticide", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection is interfering with the natural process and should stay illegal.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection can prevent gender-specific diseases from being passed onto a baby.Keypoint: Sex selection prevents diseases in the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection could create places where boys outnumber girls by a lot since there are many places that value boys more than girls, and this could create problems as they get olderKeypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There could well be valid medical and genetic reasons why a couple may which to ensure a child of a particulat gender - this should be an available option for them.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should have the freedom to choose the gender they want their baby to be.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize sex selection because an imbalance of men and women will lead to more violence against women down the line as more young men are unable to find partners.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Maximizing reproductive freedom includes sex selection.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This is immoral and unnatural and goes against what nature intendedKeypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be able to chose the sex of their childKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not allow such an immoral thing that will more than likely fuel the inequality of genders by promoting men as more valuableKeypoint: Sex selection is against tradition", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should have the right to choose the sex of their childKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection leads to further harms against women. many families would choose to only have boys. the population would end up highly uneven and thrown into chaos.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection should be legalised as in the right circumstances can avoid necessary pain and suffering for children who would be born with life limiting conditions.Keypoint: Sex selection prevents diseases in the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection is a choice that should be between the parents, not something the government to be involved in.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection allows for families to better match the unit that will better match their ideal family unitKeypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is immoral & unnatural & should not be legalizedKeypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection is unethical and morally wrong - no child should be discarded because of their gender.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize sex selection because people should have the right to pick if they want to raise a boy or a girlKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents should have the right to decide what gender of child they want.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should have the right to choose the sex of their childKeypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection enhances people's right to choose and should be legalized.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents should be able to utilize any technological advances they wish in order to build their ideal family.Keypoint: Sex selection will prevent abortions/infanticide", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be able to select the sex of the children so that they can balance their family the way they wish it to be.Keypoint: Sex selection prevents diseases in the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we allow sex selection it will be open to abuse by people who want to create their idea of the perfect family, aborting perfectly healthy babies for vanity.Keypoint: Sex selection will create abortions/infanticide", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It will result in more elective abortions and cause a gender imbalanceKeypoint: Sex selection is against tradition", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection should be a constitutional right of a parentKeypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize sex selection because the parents are free to decide what gender they wantKeypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: For those who have a genetic disorder linked to the sex of the child preventing the birth of a child with a serious illness and to prevent abuse and neglect of or treatment of a child of the unwanted gender.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection allows families to be balanced.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection does not hurt anybody so people should have the freedom to choose the sex of their childKeypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If there's a scientific capability to do it - we have no right to stop people from having what they wantKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection allows parents who want a girl to get a girl.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalising sex selection would cause an imbalance in the male to female ratio in the population leading to serious social problemsKeypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is nothing wrong with a family wanting a specific sex when they have a child. this should be supported and families should be helped in any way to achieve their desired result.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection should be allowed so that families can have children of the gender they desire without overpopulating in an attempt to gain the desires sex. selection would reduce births of an unwanted sex.Keypoint: Sex selection prevents diseases in the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't because that should be decided naturally.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People being able to outwardly choose how they feel on the inside is importantKeypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection should be allowed so that families can have children of the gender they desire without overpopulating in an attempt to gain the desires sex. selection would reduce births of an unwanted sex.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection can allow for stable families to be formedKeypoint: Sex selection will prevent abortions/infanticide", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection is a choice that should be between the parents, not something the government to be involved in.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is better to never be born than to be born to parents who do not want you, therefore, we should legalize sex selection.Keypoint: Sex selection prevents diseases in the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize sex selection as with all the developments in the world we should be allowed to choose the sex of our children.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection allows for families to better match the unit that will better match their ideal family unitKeypoint: Sex selection makes the family more happy/complete", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance by distorting the natural male-female sex ratio.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This could cause imbalance in population, if a generation is selected as mainly male or femaleKeypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are some genetic disorders which affect only one gender; sex selection can save parents these consequences.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It should not be legal, it is costly and morally wrongKeypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection could create places where boys outnumber girls by a lot since there are many places that value boys more than girls, and this could create problems as they get olderKeypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize sex selection because i think people should be able to pick if they want their child to be a boy or a girlKeypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We are breaking the law of nature if we allow sex selectionKeypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize sex selection because it immoral to try and play god and decide what sex the baby will be. this will lead to more males than females in society which is a form of discriminationKeypoint: Sex selection is against tradition", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some couples may have devastating genetic diseases tied to sex so having a choice for a healthy child is immenseKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing sex selection will help ensure the children brought into the world will be wanted and loved by their parents.Keypoint: Sex selection makes the family more happy/complete", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection is a safe tool to help parents attain the family they dream of, thus should be legalizedKeypoint: Sex selection makes the family more happy/complete", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection would stop people having an abortion when they don't have the gender of child they wanted.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There could well be valid medical and genetic reasons why a couple may which to ensure a child of a particulat gender - this should be an available option for them.Keypoint: Sex selection prevents diseases in the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection leads to a gender imbalance in the next generationKeypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not be playing god. don't mess with nature.Keypoint: Sex selection is against tradition", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Families should have the right to choose the sex of their babies.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It will result in more elective abortions and cause a gender imbalanceKeypoint: Sex selection will create abortions/infanticide", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Since the parents create the fetus, they should be entitled to choose it's sexKeypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If someone would rather have a boy or a girl, they should have the right to choose.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection would fulfill the dreams of many parents.Keypoint: Sex selection prevents diseases in the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Allow the selection of sex could alter the natural order of thingsKeypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection is interfering with the natural process and should stay illegal.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents should be able to utilize any technological advances they wish in order to build their ideal family.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing sex selection will help ensure the children brought into the world will be wanted and loved by their parents.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When families are only permitted to have one child, it is important for parents to be able to select the sex of that child.Keypoint: Sex selection will prevent abortions/infanticide", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection leads to a gender imbalance in the next generationKeypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection goes against nature and should not be legalized, it's like playing god.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection will have troublesome effects on gender disparity.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It can lead to a gender imbalance in societyKeypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This should be banned as it is immoral.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents should have the right to make decisions about their own child.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex section could be useful in balancing the genders of a larger family, and surely parents can be afforded some degree of control?Keypoint: Sex selection will prevent abortions/infanticide", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection would obviously lead to an imbalance and discrimination of one sex, especially in societies that have traditionally viewed women as inferior or unwanted as children.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection would obviously lead to an imbalance and discrimination of one sex, especially in societies that have traditionally viewed women as inferior or unwanted as children.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some couples may have devastating genetic diseases tied to sex so having a choice for a healthy child is immenseKeypoint: Sex selection prevents diseases in the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Selecting the sex of your baby will mean perfectly healthy babies are aborted because the parents want to choose the sex, which surely must be morally corrupt.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we can control what sex the child will be born as and families want to do that we should legalize it. if this doesn't harm the child and they grow up healthy it hurts nobody by doing this.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection can be useful for a family to balance out their's; say a family has three boys, and wants a girl.Keypoint: Sex selection will prevent abortions/infanticide", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing sex selection would be too costly, causing a surplus of one gender in just a couple decades time.Keypoint: Sex selection is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection will increase the already ridiculously high number of abortions happening in the world.Keypoint: Sex selection will create abortions/infanticide", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection should not be legalized as it isnt ethical its going against the natural course of lifeKeypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing medical sex selection can prevent the abortion of unwanted gendered babiesKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize sex selection because it lets the family choose what kind of child they will haveKeypoint: Sex selection will prevent abortions/infanticide", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection should be a choice for parents to make and therefore should be legalized.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are many medical conditions that are related to a specific gender, if either of the parents are known carriers of a disease they may be able to use sex selection to make sure they have a healthy babyKeypoint: Sex selection prevents diseases in the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection is against many religions and is offensive. people should not be playing god with the natural process of life.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing sex selection would be too costly, causing a surplus of one gender in just a couple decades time.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If one gender greatly outnumbers the other, it could cause big problems when they become adults and can't find partners to have children with.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection is playing god, will create gender imbalances and create negative stereotypes concerning male/female preferences.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection will increase the already ridiculously high number of abortions happening in the world.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection shouldn't be legalized because it's a breach of moral and ethicsKeypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are many medical conditions that are related to a specific gender, if either of the parents are known carriers of a disease they may be able to use sex selection to make sure they have a healthy babyKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalizing sex selection would be too costly, causing a surplus of one gender in just a couple decades time.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection could cause more of one sex thus creating an imbalance.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When people mess with mother nature by trying to select the sex of their child, only bad things can happen.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize sex selection as people have every right to chose the sex of the child they wish to raise.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Families should have the right to choose the sex of their babies.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: In countries like china, where parents can only have one child, it is important to allow them to select the sex of their child.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If someone would rather have a boy or a girl, they should have the right to choose.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is better to never be born than to be born to parents who do not want you, therefore, we should legalize sex selection.Keypoint: Sex selection makes the family more happy/complete", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Countries that used sex selection, like china, now have a problem with two many older men and not enough women to marry them and have more children for the next generation.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we gave people the right to choose the sex we will have very few females in our world. they most likely would choose a boy. let god be the creator of the child and we should never intervene.Keypoint: Sex selection is against tradition", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is against nature and could upset the balance of the population.Keypoint: Sex selection is against tradition", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection would fulfill the dreams of many parents.Keypoint: Sex selection makes the family more happy/complete", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize sex selection as it is a parents right to choose and many families may want a girl after many boys and so sex selection will help ensure a wanted pregnancy.Keypoint: Sex selection will prevent abortions/infanticide", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection allows parents who want a girl to get a girl.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection is unethical, it shouldn't matter if the baby is born a boy or a girl, as long as the baby is healthy that's all what matters. parents shouldn't be acting like godKeypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It helps to insure that the parents get the gender of the child they want and will loveKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize sex selection as it is a parents right to choose and many families may want a girl after many boys and so sex selection will help ensure a wanted pregnancy.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It should not be legal, it is costly and morally wrongKeypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Selecting the sex of babies could lead to an in balance in society demonstrated by china , where the one child policy resulted in areas where there are approximately 10 males to 1 female.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection can lead to a gender imbalance if one sex is favoured over the other. this can lead to a lack of suitable partners in the future and people being forced to lead a single life.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The selection of sex can break the natural balance between males and femalesKeypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Parents have the right to select the sex of their childKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It should not be legal, it is costly and morally wrongKeypoint: Sex selection is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Its unnatural. you shouldn't have the right or ability to choose or abort based solely on sex. this can lead to complete disproportionate numbers if people decide to favor one sex over the other.Keypoint: Sex selection reaffirms gender stereotypes/biases", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection will leave some countries with more males than females because certain countries value males more than femalesKeypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a family has a child or multiple children of the same sex, sex selection allows for the family to insure they have a child of the opposite sex.Keypoint: Sex selection prevents diseases in the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize sex selection as this is enabling people to play god and may lead to the destabilisation of future generations e.g. more males than femalesKeypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This should be banned as it is immoral.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It's a personal decision that should not be regulatedKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection enhances people's right to choose and should be legalized.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection is unethical, it shouldn't matter if the baby is born a boy or a girl, as long as the baby is healthy that's all what matters. parents shouldn't be acting like godKeypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize sex selection because people should be able to pick the sex of the baby they want instead of having the sex forced on themKeypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection should be legalised for parents who wish to choose the sex of their child. it is no one else's business but their own.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The right to bodily autonomy permits mothers to have abortions for sex selective purposesKeypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should legalize sex selection as it is a parents right to choose and many families may want a girl after many boys and so sex selection will help ensure a wanted pregnancy.Keypoint: Sex selection prevents diseases in the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: What kind of society do we live in if people can murder their own child just because it is the \"wrong\" gender?Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection should be a parent's choice.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection allows families to be balanced.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection goes against nature and god. we don't have a right to start changing the things that are just 'meant to be\".Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize sex selection because it immoral to try and play god and decide what sex the baby will be. this will lead to more males than females in society which is a form of discriminationKeypoint: Sex selection will create abortions/infanticide", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection should be legal for parents to select the sex of the child. parents with all boys or all girls should have the choice of selecting the other sex.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be able to utilize new sciences as they please.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection shouldn't be legalized because it's a breach of moral and ethicsKeypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection encourages gender discrimination, which is illegalKeypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not legalize sex selection because no man should play god.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Families have the right to use available technology to create the family they want.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If one gender greatly outnumbers the other, it could cause big problems when they become adults and can't find partners to have children with.Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalance", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Selecting sex might throw off the balance between male and female. many cultures value males over femalesKeypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Knowing the gender of your baby makes it easier to purchase items for the baby before its birth.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Legalized sex selection would help couples prepare for the birth of their babyKeypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Gender selection is an extremely expensive medical process.Keypoint: It is unethical/unhealthy for parents to intervene", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If a family has a child or multiple children of the same sex, sex selection allows for the family to insure they have a child of the opposite sex.Keypoint: Sex selection allows for better family planning", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex selection can be useful for a family to balance out their's; say a family has three boys, and wants a girl.Keypoint: Sex selection prevents diseases in the child", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This is immoral and unnatural and goes against what nature intendedKeypoint: Sex selection is against tradition", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we can control what sex the child will be born as and families want to do that we should legalize it. if this doesn't harm the child and they grow up healthy it hurts nobody by doing this.Keypoint: It is within the freedoms of the parents to select the sex of the child", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - } - ] -} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/tasks/task1303_kpa_keypoint_matching_flag_burning_topic.json b/tasks/task1303_kpa_keypoint_matching_flag_burning_topic.json deleted file mode 100644 index 51badb348..000000000 --- a/tasks/task1303_kpa_keypoint_matching_flag_burning_topic.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,1864 +0,0 @@ -{ - "Contributors": [ - "Arjun Ashok" - ], - "Source": [ - "ArgKP (https://github.com/IBM/KPA_2021_shared_task)" - ], - "Definition": "The input contains an argument and a keypoint on the topic \"We should prohibit flag burning\", separated by \"\".Your task is to answer if the keypoint matches the argument and summarizes exactly what the argument means, in the context of this topic.", - "Categories": [ - "Classification -> Verification -> Summary Verification", - "Text Comparison" - ], - "Domains": [ - "Reviews", - "Law", - "Government and Politics", - "Dialogue" - ], - "Input_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Output_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Instruction_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Positive Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: The flag is an american symbol of honer and integrity and should not be destroyed as this is negative to the values shared by the majority of americans.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that the flag is an american symbol of honer and integrity and should not be destroyed as this is negative to the values shared by the majority of americans." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is an offensive action against those who have risked their lives or died defending that flag. those who burn that flag should be arrested.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that flag burning is an offensive action against those who have risked their lives or died defending that flag. those who burn that flag should be arrested." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should prohibit flag burning for various reasonn one is peace of worldKeypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that we should prohibit flag burning for various reasonn one is peace of world" - } - ], - "Negative Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is constitutionally protected. free speech and expression is the cornerstone of democracy. prohibiting this is a slippery slope of rights being abolished.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that flag burning is constitutionally protected. free speech and expression is the cornerstone of democracy. prohibiting this is a slippery slope of rights being abolished." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: America was founded by the freedom of expression, so people should be allowed to burn a flag, regardless of whether i agree with the concept or notKeypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that america was founded by the freedom of expression, so people should be allowed to burn a flag, regardless of whether i agree with the concept or not" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning should not be allowed as it causes civil unrestKeypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that flag burning should not be allowed as it causes civil unrest" - } - ], - "Instances": [ - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit flag burning because people have rights to do whatever they want to do and plus flag burning is not going to hurt anyone it only hurt their own identityKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Burning a flag should not be allowed as it is against a country's sense of nationalism and pride.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a legitimate form of protest and is protected as free speech. to prohibit flag burning is to attack freedom of expression.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning should be prohibited because it is a disrespect to the citizens of the regions it representsKeypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Burning the national flag can incite hatred and therefore it should be banned.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It really is just a gesture of anger towards another country that does not lead to anything else other than being a symbol of feeling.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a means of expression and should be allowed under freedom of speech.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a constitutional right and cannot be banned without changing the constitution.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: To ban flag burning would be a serious violation of the first ammendment.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is simply a form of protesting that isn't harming anyone directly.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The right to free speech also includes flag burning, which is used to express an opinion.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a constitutional right and should not be a criminal offenseKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a right protected under the first amendment. it should be considered free speech.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is an important symbol of defiance and protest, that can be used to show opposition to an oppressive or criminal abuse of power.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is free speech and free speech is allowedKeypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The flag is an important symbol of the country and shouldn't be destroyed.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is meant to incite violent reactions and cause suffering to people who care about the flag, which means it isn't protected under the first amendment and should be banned.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is disrespectful to the country and everything it stands for.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: While it may be offensive, flag burning does not incite to violence nor does it cause any direct harm to any individual therefore there is no justification for banning the act.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The flag is an american symbol of honer and integrity and should not be destroyed as this is negative to the values shared by the majority of americans.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a right protected under the first amendment. it should be considered free speech.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is merely a very visible form of freedom of expression, which should be protected to the same degree as freedom of speech.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If you buy a flag it is your propertyKeypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A flag symbolizes a country and by burning it you are showing disrespectKeypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is a traitorous action by terroristsKeypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: To prohibit flag burning is to deny people their rights its a way of expressing opinionKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit flag burning because there are many legitimate reasons to burn a flag in protest.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is free speech and free speech is allowedKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning can be deeply offensive and could be seen as racism.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning should be considered free speech or freedom of expression, so it should be allowed.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit flag burning because people have the right to do so as long as they are doing it peacefully and not harming anyone.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The first amendment allows for people to peacefully protest, which includes flag burningKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Burning of the flag is free speech. even if we don't agree, it's still protected and should remain as such.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prohibiting flag burning is a dangerous step onto the path of limiting free speech.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The prohibition of flag burning is equal to prohibition of free speechKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit flag burning because people have rights to do whatever they want to do and plus flag burning is not going to hurt anyone it only hurt their own identityKeypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Burning the flag is freedom of speech and it would be unconstitutional to ban it.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is freedom of speech and should not be prohibited.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is a form of freedom of speech and therefore should not be banned.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is the most insulting way of attacking a countries values and opinions and shows a lack of respect beyond acceptanceKeypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is technically a form of speech and therefore protected by the countries laws.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning should be prohibited because it is a practice used by foreign countries to protest whatever they want about our country. we should respect our flag.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a use of free speech which we should never prohibit.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We have a right to free speech as long as we are not hurting others. even distasteful actions such as this must be tolderatedKeypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A person has a right to state his opinion about how he feels about his countryKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is disrespectful to the country and to those who fought for the freedom the flag represents.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Burning the flag is freedom of speech and it would be unconstitutional to ban it.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Freedom of speech and expression protects flag burning. you can't prohibit this act without directly violating individual's rights. you can not cherry pick which rights are upheld.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is unpatriotic and causes division among peopleKeypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Everyone should be free to do whatever they wantKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is unpatriotic and an act of terror.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is protected under the first amendment as a right to free speech.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a form of expression, so a ban would be unconstitutional.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning should be prohibited because the flag represents freedom. you should not be allowed to destroy an american icon.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is the most insulting way of attacking a countries values and opinions and shows a lack of respect beyond acceptanceKeypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning its like a insult to other peopleKeypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Burning the flag is freedom of speech and should be allowedKeypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning isn't a big problem in the status quo. prohibiting it will bring attention to the practice and cause social discontent where there isn't any in the status quo.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a constitutionally protected act of free speechKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is disrespectable to america as it represents everything we, as americans hold dear and true.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It's only a flag and simply a protest when it's burned by people who feel they cannot otherwise make their voices heard.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is only an expression of dissatiafactionKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a use of free speech which we should never prohibit.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Burning the american flag is an act of desecration.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We have a right to free speech as long as we are not hurting others. even distasteful actions such as this must be tolderatedKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prohibiting flag burning is the right thing to do to respect our nation.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit flag burning as it is an extension of free speech and people should not be prevented from acting as they feel.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Burning the flag is free speech; thus, the right to burn the flag should be protected.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is disruptive to civil peace.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is technically a form of speech and therefore protected by the countries laws.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit flag burning everyone should have the freedom to do what they want to do, and it is just a flag not an important symbol of our nation.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit flag burning everyone should have the freedom to do what they want to do, and it is just a flag not an important symbol of our nation.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit flag burning because freedom of speech is one of the defining rights of the american citizens.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a freedom that is guaranteed by the first amendmentKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Everyone should be free to do whatever they wantKeypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a legitimate form of expression.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Clearly it must be forbidden, the lack of respect for national symbols should not be toleratedKeypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should prohibit flag burning as it shows absolute no respect for one's country.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be free to do as they please.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be able to express views in any way they wish; burning flags is a way of doing thisKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: America was founded by the freedom of expression, so people should be allowed to burn a flag, regardless of whether i agree with the concept or notKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a delibrate act of rabble-rousing, fanning tensions with the express interest of causing unrest and violence.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit flag burning since we a free country and that means we should be free to burn the flag if we want to.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a valid protest method that doesn't harm anyone.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is merely a very visible form of freedom of expression, which should be protected to the same degree as freedom of speech.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a right given by free speech. we cannot enforce prohibiting this.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Burning our flags and disrespecting our country should be illegal. they should be locked up in a federal prison. if you don't love this country you should not be here.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is protected under free speechKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is only an expression of dissatiafactionKeypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Freedom of speech and expression protects flag burning. you can't prohibit this act without directly violating individual's rights. you can not cherry pick which rights are upheld.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Burning a flag is an inflammatory gesture and it should be banned.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Burning a flag is a very offensive and toxic expression of hatred against people from a particular country and it's therefore a form of hate crime.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prohibiting flag burning is the right thing to do to respect our nation.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is offensive to many peopleKeypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is just an unnecessary and offensive act of vandalism and should be prohibitedKeypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This is an offensive and provocative act that is not achieving anything positiveKeypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is just another form of first ammendment speech and should be protected.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Burning a flag is a constitutional right and should not be prohibited.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is absolutely no need for it and it does not accomplish anything other than offending the country that the flag belongs to, causing war.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is freedom of speech and should not be prohibited.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It really is just a gesture of anger towards another country that does not lead to anything else other than being a symbol of feeling.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is an extremist action and leads to further conflict and resentmentKeypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The flag is a symbol of the united states, our way of life, our freedom, or soldiers and deserves respect.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a form of freedom of speech which is a protected right.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Burning your flag should be a right for people who want to do thatKeypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a sign of protest, which is covered by the constitution and should not be prohibited so as not to violate one's constitutional rights.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The flag is a piece of cloth. it is nothing but a symbol. we have the freedom to express ourselves and one form of expression should be being allowed to light a fire under a flag.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is simply a form of protesting that isn't harming anyone directly.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a right guaranteed under the first amendmentKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning should be prohibited because it can antagonize people in our country who take the flag and it's meaning seriouslyKeypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is just an unnecessary and offensive act of vandalism and should be prohibitedKeypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is disrespectable to america as it represents everything we, as americans hold dear and true.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is unpatriotic and promotes discrimination against people from the country who's flag is being burned.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a form of free speech and should not be bannedKeypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flags are essentially just a glorilized piece of fabric. a person should have the right to burn a flag as long as they own it.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a reasonable way of expressing displeasure with the state or government and shouldn't be banned.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Despite political beliefs, the flag is an important symbol which should be respected no matter what.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The flag is a representation of our country. people have died for the flag. we should respect the flag, respect the country and stop allowing the burning of the flag.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning qualifies as the right to protest, which is a right upheld by the constitution.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning an act of arson against a national treasureKeypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is disruptive to civil peace.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Our flag should be revered and held with reespectKeypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Burning the flag is freedom of speech and should be allowedKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning isn't the best way to protest. our flag represents us and is a sacred symbol. burning it is irresponsibleKeypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning prohibition is silly. it's just a piece of cloth with an assigned symbol and connotation. prohibition certainly seems to fly in the face of \"freedom of expression. \"Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Too much has been lost to protect the flag. we cannot allow it to be burned.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Burning the flag is free speech; thus, the right to burn the flag should be protected.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is very disrespectful and inflammatory and causes even more trouble.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is like spitting in this country's idealsKeypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Burning a flag is a form of speech and as we have freedom of speech in our nation, it should be allowed under the constitution.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is a manner of free speech currently protected under the first amendment. banning it would be unconstitutional.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should prohibit flag burning because it is an act of terror. those who burn flags are an enemy of the state by destroying the countries symbol.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is disrespectful to the men and women who carried that flag while they fought and died for our freedom.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a right given by free speech. we cannot enforce prohibiting this.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It's freedom of expression for those who want to take a stand.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning should be prohibited because it is a practice used by foreign countries to protest whatever they want about our country. we should respect our flag.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is wrong and goes against the morals of the usa.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning, while not a good thing, should still be protected under our granted freedoms in this country since it doesn't cause harm to another person.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is dangerous because it incites people to violence.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is disrespectful to the many soldiers that have lost their lives to protect this country.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a constitutionally protected act of free speechKeypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The first amendment protects the right to free speech, which includes flag burning.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Burning our flag disrespects our country.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Burning a flag is a constitutional right and should not be prohibited.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a blatantly hostile, disrespectful action what should be bannedKeypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is an insult to all those that served the country.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit flag burning as it is an extension of free speech and people should not be prevented from acting as they feel.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is a symbol of our country and stands for important things and should be protected.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should prohibit flag burning because most people think it should be limited, and democracies should respect the will of the people even if it is unpalatable.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Burning the flag is a strong and valid way of making a statement against an oppressive regime that is non-violentKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning, while not a good thing, should still be protected under our granted freedoms in this country since it doesn't cause harm to another person.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a freedom of expression that is protected by the first amendment of the constitutionKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is disrespected to anyone who has ever faught for their country.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning should not be prohibited because it is unconstitutional and violates our freedom of speechKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Burning the flag, despite being an offense to some people is also an act of freedom of expression and must be respectedKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning should be prohibited because it is a desecration of the flag and should be illegalKeypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many lives have been lost defending the flag and the country it represent. burning the flag is a complete slap in the face to everything our country stands for.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Each individual may be able to freely express themselves against the system without hurting another individual. freedom of expression should not be prohibited in any wayKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Burning of the flag is free speech. even if we don't agree, it's still protected and should remain as such.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should prohibit flag burning because people that burn flags are genuinely not very nice people and should not be encouraged with their actions.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It often inflames the situations and leads to violenceKeypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is basically incitement and should be treated as a criminal offence because it placed societies in danger.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is not speech but an unnecessary and offensive act of vandalismKeypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a constitutional right and should not be a criminal offenseKeypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is a symbol of our country and stands for important things and should be protected.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The prohibition of flag burning is equal to prohibition of free speechKeypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Clearly it must be forbidden, the lack of respect for national symbols should not be toleratedKeypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The first amendment protects the right to free speech, which includes flag burning.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning, while the majority hate it, is a simple way of protesting that is not physically hurting anyone.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: I thnink that we should prohibit flag burningbecause is repsect of countyKeypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Despite political beliefs, the flag is an important symbol which should be respected no matter what.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should prohibit flag burning because the flag is a symbol of our country and if people don't like it they should just leave our country not burn our flagsKeypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning should be banned because it is an assault on our country.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The right to free speech also includes flag burning, which is used to express an opinion.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should have the right to do what they want with something they've bought.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should prohibit flag burning since it disrespects our country.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is a form of freedom of speech and therefore should not be banned.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is disrespect to the country and to the men and women that have served it, so flag burning should be prohibitedKeypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning should not be prohibited as it is an individuals right to protest and to make this a crime will be costly and difficult to prove. ,Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A flag symbolizes a country and by burning it you are showing disrespectKeypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit flag burning as it is a victimless activity and merely reflects people's freedom of expression.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is protected under free speechKeypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Burning a flag is a form of free speech, therefore it forms a constitutional right and should not be banned.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is just another form of first ammendment speech and should be protected.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning should be prohibited because it is a desecration of the flag and should be illegalKeypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The supreme court has ruled that it is a form of free speech & should not be bannedKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The flag represents our country and the sacrifices so many have made to keep us free. it should be respected.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Its a form of free speech which we do not prohibit in the usa.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is disrespectful to those who have died defending this countryKeypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is an offense to those that have fought and died under that flag. it is like a slap in the face to those that have served the country.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a right to free speech and, therefore, should be protected.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is basically incitement and should be treated as a criminal offence because it placed societies in danger.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is dangerous because it incites people to violence.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should prohibit flag burning because people can be very emotional if they feel their country is being insulted and this can lead to violence.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a right to free speech and, therefore, should be protected.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should prohibit flag burning as it shows absolute no respect for one's country.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning should be considered free speech or freedom of expression, so it should be allowed.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a treasonous and traitorous act which should attract severe punishment.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Burning our flags and disrespecting our country should be illegal. they should be locked up in a federal prison. if you don't love this country you should not be here.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: I thnink that we should prohibit flag burningbecause is repsect of countyKeypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should prohibit flag burning because it's unpatriotic and leads to worse things like rioting.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Our flag should be revered and held with reespectKeypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning isn't the best way to protest. our flag represents us and is a sacred symbol. burning it is irresponsibleKeypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning should be prohibited because the flag represents freedom. you should not be allowed to destroy an american icon.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a freedom that is guaranteed by the first amendmentKeypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is disrespect to the country and to the men and women that have served it, so flag burning should be prohibitedKeypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The flag is an important symbol of the country and shouldn't be destroyed.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is just a piece of material and therefore not that importantKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a constitutional right and cannot be banned without changing the constitution.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People should be free to do as they please.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Each person has the right to express their opinion in the best way that seemsKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should prohibit flag burning because is esentail and fundamental in countris in warKeypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The first amendment protects you right to do this.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We cannot prohibit flag burning. it is a form of protest and should be protected by the first amendment which is freedom of speech.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Its a form of free speech which we do not prohibit in the usa.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit flag burning because expressing political opinions is protected speech in liberal democratic countries.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Societal outrage is not a strong enough reason to suppress free speech, since this can be a justification for banning anything that upsets people. people who don't like flag burning can just look away.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is an act of great emotional relevance and should be banned in addition to a humiliation to the countryKeypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The first amendment protects you right to do this.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit flag burning as it is a victimless activity and merely reflects people's freedom of expression.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is unpatriotic and disrespectul to a country and its laws.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a deliberately incendiary and provocative act, the ultimate goal of which is to stir civil unrest and create violence.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Each individual may be able to freely express themselves against the system without hurting another individual. freedom of expression should not be prohibited in any wayKeypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't prohibit flag burning because it is a way of showing freedom of speechKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is just a way of showing your feelings and should not be banned.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It often inflames the situations and leads to violenceKeypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is constitutionally protected. free speech and expression is the cornerstone of democracy. prohibiting this is a slippery slope of rights being abolished.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Too much has been lost to protect the flag. we cannot allow it to be burned.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Burning our flag disrespects our country.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a delibrate act of rabble-rousing, fanning tensions with the express interest of causing unrest and violence.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is protected by the first amendment.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning should not be prohibited because it is unconstitutional and violates our freedom of speechKeypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is one of the most disrespectful acts someone can doKeypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a right guaranteed under the first amendmentKeypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit flag burning since we a free country and that means we should be free to burn the flag if we want to.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a right of free speech and should be protectedKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit flag burning because freedom of speech is one of the defining rights of the american citizens.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is a manner of free speech currently protected under the first amendment. banning it would be unconstitutional.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Burning the national flag can incite hatred and therefore it should be banned.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The burning of our flag is a spit in the face to everything our country stands for along with the men and women who died to protect it.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't prohibit flag burning because it is a way of showing freedom of speechKeypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Burning a flag is an inflammatory gesture and it should be banned.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a means of expression and should be allowed under freedom of speech.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is absolutely no need for it and it does not accomplish anything other than offending the country that the flag belongs to, causing war.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning represents subversion and should be prohibited for the sake of national cohesion.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is protected by the first amendment.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is an american's right of freedom to burn the flag to show their displeasure again a country that continues to show disrespect of their own people.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is an unnecessary gesture that only serves to be divisiveKeypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prohibiting flag burning threatens freedom of speech.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is protected under the first amendment as a right to free speech.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is disrespectful to the men and women who carried that flag while they fought and died for our freedom.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning allows individuals to show their discontent with a country's policies in a peaceful way.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Burning the flag is a strong and valid way of making a statement against an oppressive regime that is non-violentKeypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning allows individuals to show their discontent with a country's policies in a peaceful way.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning can be deeply offensive and could be seen as racism.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is an important expression of free speech to which people have a right in a democractic countryKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is an expression of free speechKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prohibiting flag burning would be impinging the right of free speech.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is abhorrent to all patriots, as the flag is a symbol of all that a country stands forKeypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning shouldn't be prohibit flag burning because it limits freedom of speechKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is disrespectful to the memory of men and women who died fighting wars in the name of capitalism and should be prohibitedKeypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Burning the flag is protected free speech, just like criticism of the government.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is too extreme a form of protest that insults most people and more importantly those that served in the armed forces, and also severely undermines cohesion within a nation.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning should not be allowed as it causes civil unrestKeypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The flag is a symbol of the united states, our way of life, our freedom, or soldiers and deserves respect.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is an outright slap in the face to all the men and women who have given their life to protect our country and that act should be banned.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is the biggest way to disrespect your country, it should not be tolerated.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should prohibit flag burning because it is disrespectful to the countryKeypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning offends people so should be banned.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Living in democracy, every persona has a choice to to whatever they wants in their privacy and flag burning is one of it.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is an expression of free speech which no reputable democracy should consider banningKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a right of free speech and should be protectedKeypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a deliberately incendiary and provocative act, the ultimate goal of which is to stir civil unrest and create violence.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prohibiting flag burning threatens freedom of speech.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a freedom of speech and as such is protected under the constitution. it is an act of defiance that must continue to be allowed to protect freedoms for all.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Whilst flag burning is wrong we cannot have a 'big brother' state where every move for every person is dictated by the state, people need to be educated not dictated to.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It's only a flag and simply a protest when it's burned by people who feel they cannot otherwise make their voices heard.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The flag represents our country and the sacrifices so many have made to keep us free. it should be respected.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Burning your flag should be a right for people who want to do thatKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prohibiting flag burning is a dangerous step onto the path of limiting free speech.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is an expression of free soeechKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is an insult to those that fought to protect our freedom as well as an insult to the families who had loved ones give their lives to protect our country.Keypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a form of free speech and should not be bannedKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The act of flag burning is just about the most disgusting act a person can take part in. the flag should be respected by all and never be allowed to be burned or disrespected in any way.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a stab in the heart to the country you choose to liveKeypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Living in democracy, every persona has a choice to to whatever they wants in their privacy and flag burning is one of it.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is a valid protest and is backed by our constitutionKeypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is disrespectful to the memory of men and women who died fighting wars in the name of capitalism and should be prohibitedKeypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: To ban flag burning would be a serious violation of the first ammendment.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a valid protest method that doesn't harm anyone.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prohibiting flag burning would be impinging the right of free speech.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit flag burning because there are many legitimate reasons to burn a flag in protest.Keypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should prohibit flag burning because it is unpatriotic and it leads to dissent. the act of disgracing an emblem of a country makes one an enemy of the state and they should be arrestedKeypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning represents subversion and should be prohibited for the sake of national cohesion.Keypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is an expression of free speech which no reputable democracy should consider banningKeypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is an extremist action and leads to further conflict and resentmentKeypoint: Flag burning is an inflammatory act", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This is an offensive and provocative act that is not achieving anything positiveKeypoint: Flags are important symbols that should be respected", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Burning the flag is protected free speech, just like criticism of the government.Keypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The supreme court has ruled that flag burning is a form of free speech and is protectedKeypoint: Flag burning is justified due to freedom of expression", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Flag burning is a freedom of expression that is protected by the first amendment of the constitutionKeypoint: Flag burning is an effective tool of expression/protest/critique", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - } - ] -} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/tasks/task1304_kpa_keypoint_matching_women_in_combat_topic.json b/tasks/task1304_kpa_keypoint_matching_women_in_combat_topic.json deleted file mode 100644 index b5c49b352..000000000 --- a/tasks/task1304_kpa_keypoint_matching_women_in_combat_topic.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2398 +0,0 @@ -{ - "Contributors": [ - "Arjun Ashok" - ], - "Source": [ - "ArgKP (https://github.com/IBM/KPA_2021_shared_task)" - ], - "Definition": "The input contains an argument and a keypoint on the topic \"We should prohibit women in combat\", separated by \"\".Your task is to answer if the keypoint matches the argument and summarizes exactly what the argument means, in the context of this topic.", - "Categories": [ - "Classification -> Verification -> Summary Verification", - "Text Comparison" - ], - "Domains": [ - "Reviews", - "Law", - "Government and Politics", - "Dialogue" - ], - "Input_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Output_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Instruction_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Positive Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: There is no reason that a women that meets the standards should not be put in combat if she chooses to do soKeypoint: Women should be accepted as long as they pass the tests", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that there is no reason that a women that meets the standards should not be put in combat if she chooses to do so" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are a distraction in combat and are too emotional for the realities of warfare.Keypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that women are a distraction in combat and are too emotional for the realities of warfare." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should be allowed in combat because they can possess the same skills as men to be able to perform effectively.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that women should be allowed in combat because they can possess the same skills as men to be able to perform effectively." - } - ], - "Negative Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Women are just as capable at defending our country as men and preventing them from military duties is equivacable to gender inequality.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that women are just as capable at defending our country as men and preventing them from military duties is equivacable to gender inequality." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should have equal right to men and there for should be allowed to go into combatKeypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that women should have equal right to men and there for should be allowed to go into combat" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Men are physically superior to women. we should only have the strongest people in combatKeypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that men are physically superior to women. we should only have the strongest people in combat" - } - ], - "Instances": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Women who are fit to serve in combat situations should be allowed to do so. once they pass the requirements, we have no rights to stop them.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women bring a lot of intelligence and strategy when they go into combat that enhances the effectiveness of their units.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women have the knowledge and abilities to be able to contribute in any combat situation.Keypoint: Women can overcome differences and be just as capable in combat", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit women in combat because they should be considered equal to menKeypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are equal to men and have a right to combat if they feel it's right for themKeypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: An enemy can not attack to see that the opponent is a woman, an ally could act recklessly if the partner to save is a woman, as you see it is an abuse to the figure of the woman.Keypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should not be in armed combat. they cannot physically compete against men in strength and endurance all factors in a battle.Keypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should not be on the front lines in combat because they will take longer to recover from what they see emotionally.Keypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are too emotional and weak to be able to face the realities of combat and they should be banned from combatKeypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: In todays society where equality for women has been hard earned, it is the right of a woman to serve in a combat role if they so wish.Keypoint: Women should be able to serve in combat if they choose to", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women can do everything a man can do and if they pass all required tests and tasks, then they should be allowed in combat.Keypoint: Women should be accepted as long as they pass the tests", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Womens bodies are not suited to combat and any woman killed in combat is a potential miss for the country in terms of reproduction of the next generation.Keypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should prohibit women in combat because of lack of strength and endurance to do the job that is needed.Keypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are physically weaker than men so it does not make sense to allow them to engage in combat.Keypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should be prohibited as they arent as strong as men and can be more emotional therefore they wouldnt think as clearly as menKeypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The idea that women should not be allowed in combat is antiquated and anti-equality. women should be given the same options in the military that men are given.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are more likely to be taken captive and sexually abused.Keypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit women in combat because if they want to have mens jobs they should have them all that includes combatKeypoint: Women should be able to serve in combat if they choose to", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are less productive and less ready to face horrible scenes and they should be withdraw from the combat.Keypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are a distraction in combat and are too emotional for the realities of warfare.Keypoint: Women should serve in safer roles", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women have the right to fight just as men do.Keypoint: Women should be able to serve in combat if they choose to", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit women in combat because women can be perform just as well as men can.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should prohibit women in combat because of lack of strength and endurance to do the job that is needed.Keypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Men are physically superior to women. we should only have the strongest people in combatKeypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: All citizens should be given equal opportunity. if a woman wants to support her country on the battlefield, she should be able to do so.Keypoint: Women can create unique skills/strategies", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women can do almost everything a man can but she is the weaker sex and should not be in combatKeypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are less productive and less ready to face horrible scenes and they should be withdraw from the combat.Keypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women have the same right to bodily autonomy as men and this includes choosing a career path, including service in a combat roleKeypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should not be on the front lines in combat because they will take longer to recover from what they see emotionally.Keypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women have the right to fight just as men do.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women do not have the physical strength to support their counterparts in combat.Keypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women belong in combat just as much as men do because they are trained just as hard as men.Keypoint: Women can create unique skills/strategies", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Womens bodies are not suited to combat and any woman killed in combat is a potential miss for the country in terms of reproduction of the next generation.Keypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women can do everything a man can do and if they pass all required tests and tasks, then they should be allowed in combat.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By allowing women in combat we are putting them at a higher risk than men because they are not as strong or fast in reacting therefore they are putting themselves and everyone around them in danger.Keypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women have right to choose their careers and follow their passions therefore they should be allow to combat if that's their goal and if they are fit for itKeypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Equal rights for women makes it obvious that they also have the equal right to be part of our combat forces.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit women in combat as women are as vital as men in this situation and can bring new skills and opinions in a war environment.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit women in combat because they have the same rights as menKeypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are not as physically strong or able as their male comrades.Keypoint: Women soldier capture is a big concern", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women have the right to fight just as men do.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women in the military should be created equally as they receive the same rate of pay.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women can not physically perform like a man can and should not be in situations where they need to rescue someone physically they are unable to do.Keypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If they want equal rights then they can serve and dieKeypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should let women in combat as long as they have proved themselves to be capableKeypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are not as physically and mentally strong as men, and thus, should not be relied upon in armed combat.Keypoint: Women soldier capture is a big concern", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is scientifically proven that women are as capable as men in combat operations, so discrimination of women is not explained.Keypoint: Women can overcome differences and be just as capable in combat", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They are not as strong, or have the endurance that men doKeypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women can do the job just as well as any man can this is not the dark ages anymore.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is no reason to force those who are fit for combat to leave the armed forces as long as they voluntarily want to be in themKeypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are more fragile and might not be able to do as good of a job as menKeypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't prohibit women in combat because it lets women pursue something they are passionate aboutKeypoint: Women should be able to serve in combat if they choose to", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women have the equal right to fight in combat zones if they feel that is what they should do and are capable and so should not be prohibited from doing so.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit women in combat since there are many physically fit women that are able to handle the physical demands of combat. it should be a choice as long as you pass the physical tests.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are more level-headed than men and would be an asset in a combat roleKeypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are just as capable at defending our country as men and preventing them from military duties is equivacable to gender inequality.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Given the characteristic of sensitivity generally present in the female gender, this could put at risk combat operationsKeypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women bring different and unique skills to combat roles and should be allowed to serve. they are better at collective reasoning, group work and creating a collaborative plan for success.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women can be as physically capable as men and because they think differently to men can bring a different perspective that could be invaluable in combat.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We can't have women in combat because if they have a relationship with a male in their unit it could create problems and put them and others at riskKeypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is no reason to believe that women cannot be as reliable as men on the battleground.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are by nature nurturers and protectors of life, as such they have no place in combat.Keypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are smaller and weaker than men and their reaction time isn't as fast. therefore women in combat not only put themselves in danger, but also the people around them.Keypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Provided they are not placed in overtly physical roles, there is a place for women in the military - inclusion should be based on individal ability, not dictated by outdated ideas about gender restrictions.Keypoint: Women should be accepted as long as they pass the tests", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women have fought long and hard for equality in all walks of life including the forces, if they are trained and able then there is no reason why they cannot be on the front line with menKeypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Combat is never an individual against another individual and women are capable of using the same weapons as men as long as they are trained properlyKeypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Due to their physical makeup women do not naturally have the strength that men do and they would be at an unfair disadvantage in combatKeypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: As a whole, women are more emotional and may not be able to handle combat emotionallyKeypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women can be determined and strong as some men, so who are we to stop them from combating?Keypoint: Women can overcome differences and be just as capable in combat", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Oh please, we cannot prohibit women in combat. they are just as strong and tough as men and deserve to be treated equally.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are just as capable of combat as men are and it is sex discrimination to not allow them in combat.Keypoint: Women can overcome differences and be just as capable in combat", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: All citizens should be given equal opportunity. if a woman wants to support her country on the battlefield, she should be able to do so.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women shouldn't be allowed to fight because men are inherently stronger and would usually defeat them resulting in more injuries.Keypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women don't belong on the battlefield because there are so many things that can go wrong if they get too emotionalKeypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are smaller and weaker than men and their reaction time isn't as fast. therefore women in combat not only put themselves in danger, but also the people around them.Keypoint: Women should serve in safer roles", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should prohibit women in combat, the natural urge for a man to protect a woman means male military are distracted from their combatKeypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should be prohibited in combat because i think they are better suited at home and in the community.Keypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are more likely to be taken captive and sexually abused.Keypoint: Women soldier capture is a big concern", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are smaller and weaker than men and would be more susceptible to capture.Keypoint: Women soldier capture is a big concern", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They are not a physically strong as menKeypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women lack the stamina to be in combat rolesKeypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit women in combat as they have earned their equal rights and if they want to and feel they can go into combat should be allowed toKeypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are weaker on average than men. in combat only the strongest should be allowed.Keypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should just stay home and be safeKeypoint: Women should serve in safer roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women have been fighting for equal rights for years and prohibiting women in combat would be a giant step backwards.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are equally as capable as men and should be afforded the same opportunitiesKeypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not allow women to be put into the dangerous situation of being involved in the front lines of war. they should be protected and allow the men to be the ones to put themselves at risk.Keypoint: Women should serve in safer roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit women in combat because women can be perform just as well as men can.Keypoint: Women can overcome differences and be just as capable in combat", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women aren't as physically capable as men of handling the physical pressures of combat.Keypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should be prohibited from combat as they are the weaker sex physically and have bodily functions that cannot be accommodated well in the field.Keypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We can't have women in combat because if they have a relationship with a male in their unit it could create problems and put them and others at riskKeypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are not as physically strong as men and may hinder operations.Keypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are more likely to be targeted in combatKeypoint: Women soldier capture is a big concern", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women want to defend their country. they should be allowed to fight in a battle to support their country and its cause.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If women want equal rights, they should have to do go into combat just as a man would have toKeypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women in combat is perfectly acceptable because they can do just as much as menKeypoint: Women can overcome differences and be just as capable in combat", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prohibiting women in combat is sexist. women are just as capable of men in combat with proper training.Keypoint: Women can overcome differences and be just as capable in combat", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women can do almost everything a man can but she is the weaker sex and should not be in combatKeypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Male soldiers will be distracted by female soldiers, which can be dangerousKeypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should be prohibited in combat because they are physically weaker than men and may well slow down combat missions.Keypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If they want equal rights then they can serve and dieKeypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should not be in combat because they do not have the muscle mass needed to be as strong as men. they could be a danger to themselves and others when not strong enough to do hand to hand combat.Keypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It would be a breach of equality rights to prohibit women from combat activities.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is no need to prohibit women from combat as long as there are conditions for fitness in place. any individual who meets the necessary fitness levels will be able to be of use in combat.Keypoint: Women should be accepted as long as they pass the tests", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should not be in combat because they do not have the muscle mass needed to be as strong as men. they could be a danger to themselves and others when not strong enough to do hand to hand combat.Keypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are not as physically and mentally strong as men, and thus, should not be relied upon in armed combat.Keypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are not as physically and mentally strong as men, and thus, should not be relied upon in armed combat.Keypoint: Women should serve in safer roles", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are human beings with autonomy and the freedom to choose for themselves whether to put their lives at risk for their country.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: In a world of equal opportunities we should allow women to enter combat if they so choose.Keypoint: Women should be able to serve in combat if they choose to", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should be equally allowed to serve in combat just as men can since they add unique interpersonal skills to the military unit.Keypoint: Women can create unique skills/strategies", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should prohibit women in combat as they are not able to be as resilient under pressure.Keypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Woman are not as strong as men and would be a distraction on the battlefieldKeypoint: Women soldier capture is a big concern", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are just as capable of combat as men are and it is sex discrimination to not allow them in combat.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should be prohibited as they arent as strong as men and can be more emotional therefore they wouldnt think as clearly as menKeypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If women can pass all the tests required then they are fit for combatKeypoint: Women should be accepted as long as they pass the tests", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women who have the right training should be allowed to serve their countries in combat.Keypoint: Women should be accepted as long as they pass the tests", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women who have the right training should be allowed to serve their countries in combat.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should prohibit women in combat as they are not able to be as resilient under pressure.Keypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should not be in combat because they might serve as a distraction or not be able to keep upKeypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are physically weaker than men so it does not make sense to allow women in combat.Keypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are allowed just as much as men to go to war.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is way too much more that can be done to a captured woman in a combat area then can happen to a man.Keypoint: Women soldier capture is a big concern", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should prohibit women in combat, they are a distraction to male fighters who think they must protect the femalesKeypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are inherently weaker and should not be allowed in combatKeypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If they want equal rights they should be drafted and fight in wars just like men.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should not be in armed combat. they cannot physically compete against men in strength and endurance all factors in a battle.Keypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should be prohibited in combat because their bodies and physical strength is not equal to that of men and so they would be at greater risk in hand to hand combat and the like.Keypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should not be excluded from combat based on gender. combat capabilities are person related, not gender related.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should have this option open to them if they feel that it is their duty as this is a tenet of freedom.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should be prohibited from combat roles because they are not physically able to perform many of the tasks requiredKeypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: To achieve true equality we should allow women to join men in fighting warsKeypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are smaller and weaker than men and their reaction time isn't as fast. therefore women in combat not only put themselves in danger, but also the people around them.Keypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Woman are weaker in body strength. they also get monthly periods. they are not as physically able to fight as men are so keep them out of battle.Keypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women want to defend their country. they should be allowed to fight in a battle to support their country and its cause.Keypoint: Women should be able to serve in combat if they choose to", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Woman should be allowed in combat. they are as strong mentally and physically as men.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women in combat can be an unwanted distraction, they can also be a serious liability on the battlefield that can cost lives. combat should be left to the men like it's always been.Keypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Woman are biologically not as strong as men so they have no place on the battlefieldKeypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are weaker than men so it is folly to allow them to engage in combat.Keypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are not as physically strong as men and may hinder operations.Keypoint: Women soldier capture is a big concern", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Due to their physical makeup women do not naturally have the strength that men do and they would be at an unfair disadvantage in combatKeypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are more emotionally sensitive and may have more emotional problems after returning from combat.Keypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should prohibit women in combat because woman aren't physically built for combatKeypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If women want to stand up to fight and protect our country that desire and conviction needs to continue.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should not be in combat because they do not have the muscle mass needed to be as strong as men. they could be a danger to themselves and others when not strong enough to do hand to hand combat.Keypoint: Women should serve in safer roles", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women in combat can be an unwanted distraction, they can also be a serious liability on the battlefield that can cost lives. combat should be left to the men like it's always been.Keypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women do not have the physical abilities that men do, which are necessary in life or death combat situationsKeypoint: Women soldier capture is a big concern", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women bring a lot of intelligence and strategy when they go into combat that enhances the effectiveness of their units.Keypoint: Women can create unique skills/strategies", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should prohibit women in combat because they are not as strong as menKeypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not allow women to serve in active combat due to their lack of suitability in a life threatening scenario and the danger to their mental health.Keypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is no reason to believe that women cannot be as reliable as men on the battleground.Keypoint: Women can overcome differences and be just as capable in combat", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are perceived to be the weaker sex and could leave us at a disadvantage.Keypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should prohibit women in combat because they are not as strong as menKeypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women have already proven themselves in combat, therefore they should be allowed to continue to help their country in this capacity.Keypoint: Women can create unique skills/strategies", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should be given the opportunity to serve their country if they choose toKeypoint: Women should be able to serve in combat if they choose to", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are human beings with autonomy and the freedom to choose for themselves whether to put their lives at risk for their country.Keypoint: Women should be able to serve in combat if they choose to", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Woman are often as fit and strong as men, both mentally and physically, and should be allowed in combat if they chooseKeypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By allowing women in combat we are putting them at a higher risk than men because they are not as strong or fast in reacting therefore they are putting themselves and everyone around them in danger.Keypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Woman in combat can equally do just as much as their male counterparts in combat duty.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women can have any job they want in these modern times and if serving their country is appealing to them then they should be allowed to serve just like anyone else.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women have the knowledge and abilities to be able to contribute in any combat situation.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women aren't as physically capable as men of handling the physical pressures of combat.Keypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women can have any job they want in these modern times and if serving their country is appealing to them then they should be allowed to serve just like anyone else.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should be free to choose if they wish to serve in the armed forces and engage in combat.Keypoint: Women should be able to serve in combat if they choose to", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Prohibiting women in combat is sexist. women are just as capable of men in combat with proper training.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are not as physically and mentally strong as men, and thus, should not be relied upon in armed combat.Keypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are just as able as men in perfoming all of the roles that military service requiresKeypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are not physically or emotionally prepared for the traumas of combat.Keypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are weaker on average than men. in combat only the strongest should be allowed.Keypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: In todays society where equality for women has been hard earned, it is the right of a woman to serve in a combat role if they so wish.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women physically do not have the strength, both emotionally and physically, to perform combat under pressure and women should be prohibited from combat.Keypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women can be every bit as tough as men and deserve to be treated equally which means they ought to be allowed to fight in combat alongside menKeypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are inherently weaker and should not be allowed in combatKeypoint: Women soldier capture is a big concern", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women have the right to equal opportunity including military combat.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are just as capable of combat as men are and not allowing them in a combat situation is sex discrimination.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should prohibit women in combat because they aren't physically capable, females are proven to be weaker than males.Keypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should not be in combat because they do not have the muscle mass needed to be as strong as men. they could be a danger to themselves and others when not strong enough to do hand to hand combat.Keypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are a distraction in combat and are too emotional for the realities of warfare.Keypoint: Women soldier capture is a big concern", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is no reason to force those who are fit for combat to leave the armed forces as long as they voluntarily want to be in themKeypoint: Women should be able to serve in combat if they choose to", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: With modern equipment there is no difference between the abilities of males and females in combat roles therefore we should allow women in combatKeypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit women in combat because they should be considered equal to menKeypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Gender should not matter when it comes to combat. as long as proper physical and mental tests are in place that iss all that should matter for selection.Keypoint: Women should be accepted as long as they pass the tests", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: An enemy can not attack to see that the opponent is a woman, an ally could act recklessly if the partner to save is a woman, as you see it is an abuse to the figure of the woman.Keypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Gender should not matter when it comes to combat. as long as proper physical and mental tests are in place that iss all that should matter for selection.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some occupations require specialist physical skills and attributes that the female body simply doesn't possess, and it is harmful to think otherwise merely as a sop to gender equality.Keypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are inherently weaker and should not be allowed in combatKeypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women belong in combat just as much as men do because they are trained just as hard as men.Keypoint: Women should be accepted as long as they pass the tests", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Woman should be allowed in combat. they are as strong mentally and physically as men.Keypoint: Women can create unique skills/strategies", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Elimating women from combat situations flies in the face of gender equality - it is outdated to limit the participation of somebody purely based on sex, irrespective of how dangerous it may be.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are just as capable of combat as men are and it is sex discrimination to not allow them in combat.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It would be a breach of equality rights to prohibit women from combat activities.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women can do anything men can and it is an archaic thought to believe they should be kept away from war situations.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women shouldn't be in combat because they aren't as strong or fast as men and can be a weak linkKeypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is way too much more that can be done to a captured woman in a combat area then can happen to a man.Keypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women can do anything men can and it is an archaic thought to believe they should be kept away from war situations.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are not as physically strong or able as their male comrades.Keypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women do not have the skills or dispositions necessary to be assets in combat situations.Keypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't prohibit women in combat as woman are equal to men in many ways. we all have the right to fightKeypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women belong in combat just as much as men do because they are trained just as hard as men.Keypoint: Women should be able to serve in combat if they choose to", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women just don't have the physical or mental strength to be relied upon in armed combat.Keypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are not as physically strong or able as their male comrades.Keypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are not as physically strong as men and may hinder operations.Keypoint: Women should serve in safer roles", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should not be banned from combat as they are now an intergral part of the military and have proved to be as proficient as men in the roles they have filled.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women have the equal right to fight in combat zones if they feel that is what they should do and are capable and so should not be prohibited from doing so.Keypoint: Women should be able to serve in combat if they choose to", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If they can pass all training and everything what`s need to get involve in the combat, can`t see why they should not be in the combat?Keypoint: Women should be accepted as long as they pass the tests", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should be prohibited from combat as they are the weaker sex physically and have bodily functions that cannot be accommodated well in the field.Keypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit women in combat as women are as vital as men in this situation and can bring new skills and opinions in a war environment.Keypoint: Women can create unique skills/strategies", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many women are not a physically strong as menKeypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women can provide supporting roles in combat that complement the roles of men they serve with.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women have fought for the right to serve. there is no prohibiting of women on combat, they earned the right to fight and die.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some women are more skilled combat fighters than men. why should their skills be stifled?Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women have right to choose their career path and as long as they are well suited and fully aware of the risks there is no reason why they shouldn't be in combatKeypoint: Women should be able to serve in combat if they choose to", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Combat is too brutal and harsh and women should be prohibited from itKeypoint: Women soldier capture is a big concern", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should be free to choose if they wish to serve in the armed forces and engage in combat.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women just don't have the physical or mental strength to be relied upon in armed combat.Keypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women have fought long and hard for equality in all walks of life including the forces, if they are trained and able then there is no reason why they cannot be on the front line with menKeypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are not as physically strong or able as their male comrades.Keypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If women want to stand up to fight and protect our country that desire and conviction needs to continue.Keypoint: Women should be able to serve in combat if they choose to", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are too emotional and weak to be able to face the realities of combat and they should be banned from combatKeypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not allow women to be put into the dangerous situation of being involved in the front lines of war. they should be protected and allow the men to be the ones to put themselves at risk.Keypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are not as strong as men so more people would be killed or injured with them on the battlefield.Keypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are cases where women have excelled in combat especially as fighter pilots and strategic leadership.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women can be every bit as tough as men and deserve to be treated equally which means they ought to be allowed to fight in combat alongside menKeypoint: Women can create unique skills/strategies", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should be prohibited from combat roles because they are not physically able to perform many of the tasks requiredKeypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are strong and smart and are a great asset to a unit in combat.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should prohibit women in combat, they are a distraction to male fighters who think they must protect the femalesKeypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should not be banned from combat as they are now an intergral part of the military and have proved to be as proficient as men in the roles they have filled.Keypoint: Women can overcome differences and be just as capable in combat", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women have fought for the right to serve. there is no prohibiting of women on combat, they earned the right to fight and die.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should be prohibited in combt as they are always going to have an extra emotional aspect for men which makes them vulnerable in combat.Keypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are just as capable as men and often think with cooler heads, which make them valuable assets in combat.Keypoint: Women can overcome differences and be just as capable in combat", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women shouldn't be allowed to fight because men are inherently stronger and would usually defeat them resulting in more injuries.Keypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are smaller and weaker than men and would be more susceptible to capture.Keypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are as capable as men to enter in armed combatKeypoint: Women can overcome differences and be just as capable in combat", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women and men serving in the same units on the front line can cause many problems. if romantic relations occur this can cause a distraction on the battlefield and disrupt teamwork if there is a falling out.Keypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Equal rights for women makes it obvious that they also have the equal right to be part of our combat forces.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Woman are weaker in body strength. they also get monthly periods. they are not as physically able to fight as men are so keep them out of battle.Keypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should prohibit women in combat as they create a false sense that they need to be protected which male soldiers will try to fulfil, meaning they are left vulnerableKeypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: As long as women are fully trained there are many roles that they can do equally as well as men. the main criteria for combat should be fitness not gender.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should let women in combat as long as they have proved themselves to be capableKeypoint: Women should be accepted as long as they pass the tests", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women can be as physically capable as men and because they think differently to men can bring a different perspective that could be invaluable in combat.Keypoint: Women can create unique skills/strategies", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women have right to choose their career path and as long as they are well suited and fully aware of the risks there is no reason why they shouldn't be in combatKeypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should have equal right to men and there for should be allowed to go into combatKeypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Anyone who is physically qualified should be able to be in combatKeypoint: Women should be accepted as long as they pass the tests", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some occupations require specialist physical skills and attributes that the female body simply doesn't possess, and it is harmful to think otherwise merely as a sop to gender equality.Keypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are a distraction in combat and are too emotional for the realities of warfare.Keypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women can provide supporting roles in combat that complement the roles of men they serve with.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit women in combat because they have the same rights as menKeypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women do not have the physical abilities that men do, which are necessary in life or death combat situationsKeypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should not be in combat because they do not have the muscle mass needed to be as strong as men. they could be a danger to themselves and others when not strong enough to do hand to hand combat.Keypoint: Women soldier capture is a big concern", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are equally as capable as men and should be afforded the same opportunitiesKeypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is scientifically proven that women are as capable as men in combat operations, so discrimination of women is not explained.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some women are more skilled combat fighters than men. why should their skills be stifled?Keypoint: Women can create unique skills/strategies", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should not be in combat because they might serve as a distraction or not be able to keep upKeypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women have already proven themselves in combat, therefore they should be allowed to continue to help their country in this capacity.Keypoint: Women can overcome differences and be just as capable in combat", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women have right to choose their careers and follow their passions therefore they should be allow to combat if that's their goal and if they are fit for itKeypoint: Women should be able to serve in combat if they choose to", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If they want equal rights they should be drafted and fight in wars just like men.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is no need to prohibit women from combat as long as there are conditions for fitness in place. any individual who meets the necessary fitness levels will be able to be of use in combat.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are just as capable of fighting as men.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women can have any job they want in these modern times and if serving their country is appealing to them then they should be allowed to serve just like anyone else.Keypoint: Women can create unique skills/strategies", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are equal to men and have a right to combat if they feel it's right for themKeypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women have the right to fight just as men do.Keypoint: Women can create unique skills/strategies", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women can be determined and strong as some men, so who are we to stop them from combating?Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are perfectly capable of performing well in combat situations. they have enough strength and agility to be capable soldiers and they posses excellent mental agility when making decisions.Keypoint: Women should be accepted as long as they pass the tests", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Combat is too brutal and harsh and women should be prohibited from itKeypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit women in combat, if they meet all other requirements and pass fitness tests, gender is irrelevantKeypoint: Women should be accepted as long as they pass the tests", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't prohibit women in combat because it lets women pursue something they are passionate aboutKeypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are not as strong as men so more people would be killed or injured with them on the battlefield.Keypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: In a world of equal opportunities we should allow women to enter combat if they so choose.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are more fragile and might not be able to do as good of a job as menKeypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are just as capable of combat as men are and it is sex discrimination to not allow them in combat.Keypoint: Women can create unique skills/strategies", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should prohibit women in combat, the natural urge for a man to protect a woman means male military are distracted from their combatKeypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should prohibit women in combat as they create a false sense that they need to be protected which male soldiers will try to fulfil, meaning they are left vulnerableKeypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit women in combat as they have earned their equal rights and if they want to and feel they can go into combat should be allowed toKeypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women who are fit to serve in combat situations should be allowed to do so. once they pass the requirements, we have no rights to stop them.Keypoint: Women should be accepted as long as they pass the tests", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't stop woman going into combat because everyone is equal and if a woman thinks she can fight then she should be allowed to do so..Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are cases where women have excelled in combat especially as fighter pilots and strategic leadership.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If they can pass all training and everything what`s need to get involve in the combat, can`t see why they should not be in the combat?Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are as capable as men to enter in armed combatKeypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women don't belong on the battlefield because there are so many things that can go wrong if they get too emotionalKeypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Combat is never an individual against another individual and women are capable of using the same weapons as men as long as they are trained properlyKeypoint: Women can overcome differences and be just as capable in combat", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Woman are not as strong as men and would be a distraction on the battlefieldKeypoint: Women should serve in safer roles", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Woman are not as strong as men and would be a distraction on the battlefieldKeypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women in combat shouldn't be prohibited because it's an opportunity for them to reach their dreamsKeypoint: Women should be able to serve in combat if they choose to", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are by nature nurturers and protectors of life, as such they have no place in combat.Keypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are just as capable of fighting as men.Keypoint: Women can overcome differences and be just as capable in combat", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are strong and smart and are a great asset to a unit in combat.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit women in combat because they have every much right to fight for their country as men.Keypoint: Women should be able to serve in combat if they choose to", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are physically weaker than men so it does not make sense to allow women in combat.Keypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should be prohibited in combat because i think they are better suited at home and in the community.Keypoint: Women should serve in safer roles", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Provided they are not placed in overtly physical roles, there is a place for women in the military - inclusion should be based on individal ability, not dictated by outdated ideas about gender restrictions.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are just as capable of combat as men are and not allowing them in a combat situation is sex discrimination.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They are not as strong, or have the endurance that men doKeypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women bring different and unique skills to combat roles and should be allowed to serve. they are better at collective reasoning, group work and creating a collaborative plan for success.Keypoint: Women can create unique skills/strategies", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should prohibit women in combat because woman aren't physically built for combatKeypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Elimating women from combat situations flies in the face of gender equality - it is outdated to limit the participation of somebody purely based on sex, irrespective of how dangerous it may be.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't prohibit women in combat as woman are equal to men in many ways. we all have the right to fightKeypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are physically weaker than men so it does not make sense to allow them to engage in combat.Keypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many women are not a physically strong as menKeypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: As a whole, women are more emotional and may not be able to handle combat emotionallyKeypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Anyone who is physically qualified should be able to be in combatKeypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are smaller and weaker than men and their reaction time isn't as fast. therefore women in combat not only put themselves in danger, but also the people around them.Keypoint: Women soldier capture is a big concern", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are allowed just as much as men to go to war.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women in combat are a distraction, as a man's natural instinct is to protect a female. the male soldiers wouldn't be able to effectively do their jobs.Keypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women shouldn't be in combat because they aren't as strong or fast as men and can be a weak linkKeypoint: Women soldier capture is a big concern", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should be allowed in combat because they can possess the same skills as men to be able to perform effectively.Keypoint: Women can overcome differences and be just as capable in combat", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women have the right to equal opportunity including military combat.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit women in combat because why would you deny someone who is willing to die for their country? a soldier is a soldier no matter what gender they are.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women can have any job they want in these modern times and if serving their country is appealing to them then they should be allowed to serve just like anyone else.Keypoint: Women should be able to serve in combat if they choose to", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should be allowed the same opportunities as men including combat.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Woman should be allowed in combat. they are as strong mentally and physically as men.Keypoint: Women can overcome differences and be just as capable in combat", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Male soldiers will be distracted by female soldiers, which can be dangerousKeypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women lack the stamina to be in combat rolesKeypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should be prohibited from combat roles because they lack the physical size and strength to perform many of the tasks required of themKeypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are not as physically strong or able as their male comrades.Keypoint: Women should serve in safer roles", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: All citizens should be given equal opportunity. if a woman wants to support her country on the battlefield, she should be able to do so.Keypoint: Women should be able to serve in combat if they choose to", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are just as capable as men and often think with cooler heads, which make them valuable assets in combat.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are not physically or emotionally prepared for the traumas of combat.Keypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If women want equal rights, they should have to do go into combat just as a man would have toKeypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is no reason that a women that meets the standards should not be put in combat if she chooses to do soKeypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women can do the job just as well as any man can this is not the dark ages anymore.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women can not physically perform like a man can and should not be in situations where they need to rescue someone physically they are unable to do.Keypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit women in combat, if they meet all other requirements and pass fitness tests, gender is irrelevantKeypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should have this option open to them if they feel that it is their duty as this is a tenet of freedom.Keypoint: Women should be able to serve in combat if they choose to", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are weaker than men so it is folly to allow them to engage in combat.Keypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Oh please, we cannot prohibit women in combat. they are just as strong and tough as men and deserve to be treated equally.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit women in combat because if they want to have mens jobs they should have them all that includes combatKeypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: To achieve true equality we should allow women to join men in fighting warsKeypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit women in combat because why would you deny someone who is willing to die for their country? a soldier is a soldier no matter what gender they are.Keypoint: Women should be able to serve in combat if they choose to", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women in armed conflicts are prone to violations by enemiesKeypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Woman are often as fit and strong as men, both mentally and physically, and should be allowed in combat if they chooseKeypoint: Women can overcome differences and be just as capable in combat", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not allow women to serve in active combat due to their lack of suitability in a life threatening scenario and the danger to their mental health.Keypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women can be every bit as tough as men and deserve to be treated equally which means they ought to be allowed to fight in combat alongside menKeypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When women are on the front line of combat then men will be looking out for them and not concentrating on their own safety - causing more casualties.Keypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should be prohibited in combat because they are physically weaker than men and may well slow down combat missions.Keypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are perceived to be the weaker sex and could leave us at a disadvantage.Keypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Given the characteristic of sensitivity generally present in the female gender, this could put at risk combat operationsKeypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Woman in combat can equally do just as much as their male counterparts in combat duty.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should not be excluded from combat based on gender. combat capabilities are person related, not gender related.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit women in combat because they have every much right to fight for their country as men.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When women are on the front line of combat then men will be looking out for them and not concentrating on their own safety - causing more casualties.Keypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is scientifically proven that women are as capable as men in combat operations, so discrimination of women is not explained.Keypoint: Women can create unique skills/strategies", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should be allowed the same opportunities as men including combat.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are just as able as men in perfoming all of the roles that military service requiresKeypoint: Women can overcome differences and be just as capable in combat", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: They are not a physically strong as menKeypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: With modern equipment there is no difference between the abilities of males and females in combat roles therefore we should allow women in combatKeypoint: Women can overcome differences and be just as capable in combat", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are not as physically and mentally strong as men, and thus, should not be relied upon in armed combat.Keypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women in combat might be a distraction to men if the men are poorly trained.Keypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: All citizens should be given equal opportunity. if a woman wants to support her country on the battlefield, she should be able to do so.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The women are as much or more hardened than the men, and with the received training they can handle situations of stress even better than some men.Keypoint: Women can overcome differences and be just as capable in combat", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women do not have the physical abilities that men do, which are necessary in life or death combat situationsKeypoint: Women should serve in safer roles", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should be given the opportunity to serve their country if they choose toKeypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: As long as women are fully trained there are many roles that they can do equally as well as men. the main criteria for combat should be fitness not gender.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Woman are biologically not as strong as men so they have no place on the battlefieldKeypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women in combat is perfectly acceptable because they can do just as much as menKeypoint: Women can create unique skills/strategies", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are more likely to be targeted in combatKeypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If women can pass all the tests required then they are fit for combatKeypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women have fought for decades and centuries for equal rights, not allowing them to participate in serving their country is a massive step backwards.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women in combat might be a distraction to men if the men are poorly trained.Keypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women do not have the physical abilities that men do, which are necessary in life or death combat situationsKeypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women do not have the physical strength to support their counterparts in combat.Keypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are a distraction in combat and are too emotional for the realities of warfare.Keypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women in armed conflicts are prone to violations by enemiesKeypoint: Women soldier capture is a big concern", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should be accepted into the ranks of the soldiery just as men if they too have passed the necessary assessments as they too can fulfil an important role which compliments existing soldiersKeypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is scientifically proven that women are as capable as men in combat operations, so discrimination of women is not explained.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should be prohibited from combat roles because they lack the physical size and strength to perform many of the tasks required of themKeypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should just stay home and be safeKeypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women have the same right to bodily autonomy as men and this includes choosing a career path, including service in a combat roleKeypoint: Women should be able to serve in combat if they choose to", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The women are as much or more hardened than the men, and with the received training they can handle situations of stress even better than some men.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women in the military should be created equally as they receive the same rate of pay.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women physically do not have the strength, both emotionally and physically, to perform combat under pressure and women should be prohibited from combat.Keypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are more level-headed than men and would be an asset in a combat roleKeypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Combat is too brutal and harsh and women should be prohibited from itKeypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The idea that women should not be allowed in combat is antiquated and anti-equality. women should be given the same options in the military that men are given.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should be accepted into the ranks of the soldiery just as men if they too have passed the necessary assessments as they too can fulfil an important role which compliments existing soldiersKeypoint: Women should be accepted as long as they pass the tests", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should be prohibited in combt as they are always going to have an extra emotional aspect for men which makes them vulnerable in combat.Keypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women and men serving in the same units on the front line can cause many problems. if romantic relations occur this can cause a distraction on the battlefield and disrupt teamwork if there is a falling out.Keypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women shouldn't be in combat because they aren't as strong or fast as men and can be a weak linkKeypoint: Women should serve in safer roles", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women in combat shouldn't be prohibited because it's an opportunity for them to reach their dreamsKeypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not prohibit women in combat since there are many physically fit women that are able to handle the physical demands of combat. it should be a choice as long as you pass the physical tests.Keypoint: Women should be accepted as long as they pass the tests", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women can be every bit as tough as men and deserve to be treated equally which means they ought to be allowed to fight in combat alongside menKeypoint: Women can overcome differences and be just as capable in combat", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women have been fighting for equal rights for years and prohibiting women in combat would be a giant step backwards.Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women have fought for decades and centuries for equal rights, not allowing them to participate in serving their country is a massive step backwards.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should be prohibited in combat because their bodies and physical strength is not equal to that of men and so they would be at greater risk in hand to hand combat and the like.Keypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women do not have the physical abilities that men do, which are necessary in life or death combat situationsKeypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should prohibit women in combat because they aren't physically capable, females are proven to be weaker than males.Keypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women in combat are a distraction, as a man's natural instinct is to protect a female. the male soldiers wouldn't be able to effectively do their jobs.Keypoint: Women in combat can be a distraction or harm the function of the military", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women do not have the skills or dispositions necessary to be assets in combat situations.Keypoint: Men are better suited to combat roles than women", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women should be equally allowed to serve in combat just as men can since they add unique interpersonal skills to the military unit.Keypoint: Women are an asset in combat", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Women are more emotionally sensitive and may have more emotional problems after returning from combat.Keypoint: Women cannot overcome physical/emotional/mental barriers", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't stop woman going into combat because everyone is equal and if a woman thinks she can fight then she should be allowed to do so..Keypoint: There should be equality between men and women.", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - } - ] -} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/tasks/task1305_kpa_keypoint_matching_journalism_topic.json b/tasks/task1305_kpa_keypoint_matching_journalism_topic.json deleted file mode 100644 index a5b6d5724..000000000 --- a/tasks/task1305_kpa_keypoint_matching_journalism_topic.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2476 +0,0 @@ -{ - "Contributors": [ - "Arjun Ashok" - ], - "Source": [ - "ArgKP (https://github.com/IBM/KPA_2021_shared_task)" - ], - "Definition": "The input contains an argument and a keypoint on the topic \"We should subsidize journalism\", separated by \"\".Your task is to answer if the keypoint matches the argument and summarizes exactly what the argument means, in the context of this topic.", - "Categories": [ - "Classification -> Verification -> Summary Verification", - "Text Comparison" - ], - "Domains": [ - "Reviews", - "Law", - "Government and Politics", - "Dialogue" - ], - "Input_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Output_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Instruction_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Positive Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism would give the government control over itKeypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that subsidizing journalism would give the government control over it" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need journalists to keep us informed as to what is going on in the worldKeypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that we need journalists to keep us informed as to what is going on in the world" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism would make it more efficient.Keypoint: Subsidies will increase the quality of journalism", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that subsidizing journalism would make it more efficient." - } - ], - "Negative Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize journalism as it is a key element to investigating wrong doings in societyKeypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that we should subsidize journalism as it is a key element to investigating wrong doings in society" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism subsidized by authoritarian regimes becomes a propaganda machine used to control people, telling them what to think and spreading lies to hide totalitarian regimes' abusesKeypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that journalism subsidized by authoritarian regimes becomes a propaganda machine used to control people, telling them what to think and spreading lies to hide totalitarian regimes' abuses" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Quality journalism is important it's the way we know what the people in power are doing. it's important to fund that.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that quality journalism is important it's the way we know what the people in power are doing. it's important to fund that." - } - ], - "Instances": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism must reach all citizens and the central government must ensure that information reaches all corners of the nationKeypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism would eventually lead to biased news and articlesKeypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism could raise questions about bias and editorial independence.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize journalism because it will help guarantee good honest reporting.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We already are in high enough debt, we don't need to make it worse be subsidizing pointless things.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are many sectors need subsidizing more than journalism, journalists already make good money, more money to them will be a waste.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize journalism as they are private companies and can raise tons of money without our fear of bad reporting because their company would tank if they reported bad news.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Knowledge is power and freedom, funding the public's access to high quality, trustworthy journalism is a worthy pursuit to enable a better equipped societyKeypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is incredibly important when it comes to unbiased coverage of our government.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing everything a person does can drain the pocket overtime.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism will lead to legislators threatening news agencies with taking their funding away if they report controversial content.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Non-trustworthy news sources and fake news stories abound. we must subsidize investigative journalism in order to ensure we have reliable news sources that report real facts.Keypoint: Subsidies will increase the quality of journalism", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Better journalism is needed to keep our governments in check and the general population in the knowKeypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism would result in pro-government bias. journalists would be less comfortable criticizing the government so as not to\"bite the hand that feeds them\".Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: High-quality journalism requires time, expertise, and research. all of this requires money.Keypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism should be subsidized to ensure that the news reported is objective and full of facts as opposed to the subjective views that can be posted by anyone on social media.Keypoint: Subsidies will increase the quality of journalism", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is a vital source of real information and news to make sure people are properly informed about the world so subsidizing it would help ensure that it continues without bias.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism subsidized by authoritarian regimes becomes a propaganda machine used to control people, telling them what to think and spreading lies to hide totalitarian regimes' abusesKeypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Supporting journalism makes sense because people want and need correct factsKeypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize journalism is because the government will have a full control of news they are reporting and this is not good there is always a favorable sides will take placeKeypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize journalism so that we can continue to receive quality media.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism ought to be subsidized because few people are buying newspapersKeypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism should be completely free and clear of government interventionKeypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Funding journalism would create a conflict of intrestKeypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should, if it's subsidised it could mean better journalismKeypoint: Subsidies will increase the quality of journalism", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize journalism to ensure media has the proper means to get the correct answers to the public.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism should be free from bias and present facts no matter what. if subsidized news would. have an automatic bias towards whoever is funding it which leads to inaccurate reporting and doubtful audiences.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need journalists to help keep the government in check and bring to light abuses of power.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalists receiving subsidies can be biased and untrustworthyKeypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism allows the news outlets to be of a higher quality and keep people more informed about the world around themKeypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism can make enough income to support itself as is seen by the countless successful media outletsKeypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is an important trade which keeps the people informed about all major issues.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When you subsidize journalism you are making the reporting agency less likely to report anything bad about the place that is providing the funding. therefore you are getting less accurate news.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism should be subsidized as the media is a important part of our democracy as it allows people to be more informed and clued up on all the issues in the world.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism should be subsidized because democracy can only function if the electorate is well informedKeypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism should be completely free and clear of government interventionKeypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are more important issues like health and safety to to spend our money on than journalismKeypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Funding journalism would create a conflict of intrestKeypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism is unfair. you're basically paying someone to spread your own beliefs.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalists receiving subsidies can be biased and untrustworthyKeypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing would create biased reporting.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is important in this country.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are many sectors need subsidizing more than journalism, journalists already make good money, more money to them will be a waste.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize journalism because it acts to protect poorly run and inefficent media companies from normal market forcesKeypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without journalism people have no way of having the information that empower them to make informed voting decisions, making journalism central to democracy and therefore in need of subsidization.Keypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism can lead to biased reporting as news outlets will be influenced by those who subsidize themKeypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism should be free from bias and present facts no matter what. if subsidized news would. have an automatic bias towards whoever is funding it which leads to inaccurate reporting and doubtful audiences.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is critical to creating an informed populace. subsidization will allow it to provide even more information.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize journalism because it acts to protect poorly run and inefficent media companies from normal market forcesKeypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism should be subsidized to ensure people's voices are heard and represented.Keypoint: Subsidies will increase the quality of journalism", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism would result in pro-government bias. journalists would be less comfortable criticizing the government so as not to\"bite the hand that feeds them\".Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism will limit journalists right of freedom of speech and they won't be able to cover the stories we needKeypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The is enough money in journalism already, and funds available through subsidies should be redirected towards more worthwhile causes such as healthcare.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If journalism is funded by the government the government will regulate the newsKeypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism cannot be unbiased with subsidizationKeypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism cannot be unbiased with subsidizationKeypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize journalism because it can be very helpful in getting important information to peopleKeypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If journalism is funded it would provide wider and better coverage therefore we would be better informedKeypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: By subsidizing journalist, we can get a more truthful account of facts since they would not need donations.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism would not remain independent if it received subsidies from the government.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidising journalism would enable more people to broadcast their viewpoint and include more opinions in mainstream journalism.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We already are in high enough debt, we don't need to make it worse be subsidizing pointless things.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism will be expensive for the government, the money should be used to fulfill more existential needs like housing and food instead.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism allows the news outlets to be of a higher quality and keep people more informed about the world around themKeypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It would make journalism biased, and the content would be authentic, it will lead to lots of fake news.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When you subsidize journalism you are making the reporting agency less likely to report anything bad about the place that is providing the funding. therefore you are getting less accurate news.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism should be subsidized because democracy can only function if the electorate is well informedKeypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism will be expensive for the government, the money should be used to fulfill more existential needs like housing and food instead.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism is a dangerous slope to government interference in the press.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism allows more voices to be heardKeypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Even the appearance of control through subsidies destroys the credibility of newspapers.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism would eventually lead to biased news and articlesKeypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism will lead to corruption, i.e. print the story the way i told you to or your funding is cut.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize journalism because it will undermine editorial independence and make all the news more biased towards the government.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize journalism so that journalists can cover the most important issues, rather than only the most profitable ones.Keypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidising journalism will put more resources into good investagative journalism.Keypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism provides necessary information to the populationKeypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If the government subsidized journalism it would give them full control over what we saw and heard leading to secrets and mistrusts.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism would make it more efficient.Keypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism and free press are essential for transparency in society and it is important to keep people informed.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many communities have little or no coverage of local events subsidized journalism would help to fill this gap.Keypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is imperative to a fully functioning democracyKeypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is more important than ever in an era of fake news and social media.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism and free press are essential for transparency in society and it is important to keep people informed.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: State subsidies for journalism will make journals financially dependent on the government, which will allow the government to influence what news gets reported and how the reporting is done.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The journalism won't be able to be trusted. it could be biased depending on who does the subsidising.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If subsidised by the government then they might be biased, afraid of losing the moneyKeypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It could help improving the quality of production of news events and in turn could benefit the economy by becoming a major distributorKeypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism can make enough income to support itself as is seen by the countless successful media outletsKeypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize journalism because we would not get accurate news.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The journalism won't be able to be trusted. it could be biased depending on who does the subsidising.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Funding journalism would create a conflict of intrestKeypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize journalism to help them to cover more stories real stories with facts more efficiently and to reach more people about important issues in our day to day life from politic to the world issuesKeypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Reputable journalists should get the funds they need to get their stories quickly and accurately.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is more important than ever in an era of fake news and social media.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize journalism because it is essential that we have access to news and events around the world. without journalism there will be massive corruption and less intelligence.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is imperative to a fully functioning democracyKeypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism puts the news into the control of government entities that can prevent truth in reporting to the government's own agenda and imposed beliefs.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should, if it's subsidised it could mean better journalismKeypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism increases journalist pay, allowing for better journalism.Keypoint: Subsidies will increase the quality of journalism", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism keeps people informed about what is going on with their governmentKeypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Better journalism is needed to keep our governments in check and the general population in the knowKeypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: High-quality journalism requires time, expertise, and research. all of this requires money.Keypoint: Subsidies will increase the quality of journalism", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is an essential part of democracy and freedom of expression and should not be subsidized by the state.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The reporting of news is an important serviceKeypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism being subsidized would be dangerous in that it allows the possibility for one side to push their own agenda rather than seeking out the actual truth to report.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If journalism is funded by the government the government will regulate the newsKeypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism acts as a check on public institutions and should be subsidized, as private funds are no longer enough to sustain their mission.Keypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidization will allow journals to act on stories that are most important instead of just those that will get them the most money, which means you will get more airing of important but less catchy stories.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism can lead to biased reporting as news outlets will be influenced by those who subsidize themKeypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism means more resources at the disposal of journalists / news media companies. more resources leads to better-quality journalism overall.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is an important part of our political system; it keeps citizens informed and exposes government corruption.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize journalism because it acts to protect poorly run and inefficent media companies from normal market forcesKeypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidising journalism will put more resources into good investagative journalism.Keypoint: Subsidies will increase the quality of journalism", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism needs no help, there is a vast array of ways to get information and subsidizing it would only create polarization of informationKeypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize journalism because money is fungible and this would trade off with education and other more important issues.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism would make it beholden to the current administration and the integrity would decline.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If subsidised by the government then they might be biased, afraid of losing the moneyKeypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidized journalism could cause the journalists to become biased towards whoever is subsidizing them.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize journalism because it will undermine editorial independence and make all the news more biased towards the government.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The government is too debt-burdened. it can't afford to subsidize journalism.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidies can make journalists biased towards the companies subsidising themKeypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism provides people with accurate and up to date information that is essential to a positive well being.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It could become partial to whoever paysKeypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism must be subsidized by democratic governments to combat fake news propagated by corporations who don't have people's best interests in mindKeypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism would lead to nothing but manipulating journalists and leaving the general public unable to trust in them.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism will enable higher salaries be paid to journalists and ensure we keep good, talented newspeople reporting the news.Keypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The is enough money in journalism already, and funds available through subsidies should be redirected towards more worthwhile causes such as healthcare.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If subsidised by the government then they might be biased, afraid of losing the moneyKeypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism puts the news into the control of government entities that can prevent truth in reporting to the government's own agenda and imposed beliefs.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism should not be subsidized because subsidies could too easily be allotted according to political beliefs.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism only succeeds in propping up weak and poorly run organizations which otherwise would soon failKeypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism puts the news into the control of government entities that can prevent truth in reporting to the government's own agenda and imposed beliefs.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism makes it impossible to criticize the government in fear of losing a subsidy.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is the heart of a nation development by spreading needed and vital information to the population. it's a noble duty which should gain recognition and more fundingKeypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism will be expensive for the government, the money should be used to fulfill more existential needs like housing and food instead.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism is a dangerous slope to government interference in the press.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism needs funding to continue its important job of delivering information to the public.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is the only way to create government and other institutional accountability, since investigative journalists are the main people who explore cover ups and corruption, meaning it should be subsidized.Keypoint: Subsidies will increase the quality of journalism", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If journalism was subsidised it would encourage more inaccurate, poor quality work.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalists receiving subsidies can be biased and untrustworthyKeypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism will lead to legislators threatening news agencies with taking their funding away if they report controversial content.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not because then more journalists will pop up and could spread false information.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is the heart of a nation development by spreading needed and vital information to the population. it's a noble duty which should gain recognition and more fundingKeypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism could cause them to not report only what the government (or whoever is paying the bill) will allow them to.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Quality journalism is important it's the way we know what the people in power are doing. it's important to fund that.Keypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Making journalism subject to the forces of capitalism negatively affects their impartialityKeypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism would make it beholden to the current administration and the integrity would decline.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize journalism because information is necessary to facilitate democracy.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize journalism because money is fungible and this would trade off with education and other more important issues.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is critical to creating an informed populace. subsidization will allow it to provide even more information.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism allows the news outlets to be of a higher quality and keep people more informed about the world around themKeypoint: Subsidies will increase the quality of journalism", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism will limit journalists right of freedom of speech and they won't be able to cover the stories we needKeypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism ought to be subsidized because few people are buying newspapersKeypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This would provide more accurate and less biased opinions.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism could raise questions about bias and editorial independence.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism acts as a check on public institutions and should be subsidized, as private funds are no longer enough to sustain their mission.Keypoint: Subsidies will increase the quality of journalism", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize journalism because we need to keep local journalism alive so people are aware of what is going on in their community, but small news papers are struggling the most.Keypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize journalism to help them to cover more stories real stories with facts more efficiently and to reach more people about important issues in our day to day life from politic to the world issuesKeypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is essential for an informed democracy, so better journalism means more effective democracy.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism would give the government control over itKeypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is an important part of our political system; it keeps citizens informed and exposes government corruption.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: State subsidies for journalism will make journals financially dependent on the government, which will allow the government to influence what news gets reported and how the reporting is done.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism means more resources at the disposal of journalists / news media companies. more resources leads to better-quality journalism overall.Keypoint: Subsidies will increase the quality of journalism", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: One problem i find with subsidizing it is that when they go after the people in power they could cut their funding so they would be gun shy about reporting that.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism will limit journalists right of freedom of speech and they won't be able to cover the stories we needKeypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize journalism because it can be very helpful in getting important information to peopleKeypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: One problem i find with subsidizing it is that when they go after the people in power they could cut their funding so they would be gun shy about reporting that.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism should be subsidize to promote impartial news and rigorous workKeypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without journalism people have no way of having the information that empower them to make informed voting decisions, making journalism central to democracy and therefore in need of subsidization.Keypoint: Subsidies will increase the quality of journalism", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism will lead to legislators threatening news agencies with taking their funding away if they report controversial content.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism would result in pro-government bias. journalists would be less comfortable criticizing the government so as not to\"bite the hand that feeds them\".Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize journalism as they are private companies and can raise tons of money without our fear of bad reporting because their company would tank if they reported bad news.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Reputable journalists should get the funds they need to get their stories quickly and accurately.Keypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism lowers the barrier to entry and can allow more fake news and junk reporting to proliferate so to speakKeypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism could raise questions about bias and editorial independence.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism has been an important profession.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidized journalism ensures that the news is factual and from a reliable source so i agree with it.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism might allow companies to pay for opinions, thus introducing biases in reporting.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism only succeeds in propping up weak and poorly run organizations which otherwise would soon failKeypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is important enough to society to be subsidized because it provides information that people can't get on their own.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Even the appearance of control through subsidies destroys the credibility of newspapers.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The is enough money in journalism already, and funds available through subsidies should be redirected towards more worthwhile causes such as healthcare.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize journalism because a lot of the journalists spread false newsKeypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is important to ensure that the population is informed about important issues.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Funding comes with overt or covert strings attached, certain criticisms of the government would vanishKeypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize journalism because democracy can only function well if the public is well informed by exposure to a broad spectrum of views.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Even if the government doesn't gain influence over the reported news, the perception that it does will increase public distrust and prevent journalists from doing their job.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The government is too debt-burdened. it can't afford to subsidize journalism.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism might allow companies to pay for opinions, thus introducing biases in reporting.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Funding comes with overt or covert strings attached, certain criticisms of the government would vanishKeypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism allows news organizations to avoid manipulation by companies through advertising spending.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need high quality journalism to combat corruption in our nationKeypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism should not be subsidized because subsidies could too easily be allotted according to political beliefs.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism should be funded by the government as it promotes learning and worldwide communication.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If journalism is funded by the government the government will regulate the newsKeypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Non-trustworthy news sources and fake news stories abound. we must subsidize investigative journalism in order to ensure we have reliable news sources that report real facts.Keypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are more important issues like health and safety to to spend our money on than journalismKeypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism should be subsidized to ensure that the news reported is objective and full of facts as opposed to the subjective views that can be posted by anyone on social media.Keypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Due to the rise of instant gratification online media and the fall of print media, journalism has been struggling economically a lot more in recent times. subsidization will pull it out of the slump.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize journalism because money is fungible and this would trade off with education and other more important issues.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize journalism is because the government will have a full control of news they are reporting and this is not good there is always a favorable sides will take placeKeypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize journalism is because the government will have a full control of news they are reporting and this is not good there is always a favorable sides will take placeKeypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: I believe the government should help pay for journalism because it would allow for better coverage of news events, and help pay the high costs of filming.Keypoint: Subsidies will increase the quality of journalism", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism helps to lower the socioeconomic barriers to publishing press and allows a wider range of views and people to be respresented in the pressKeypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize journalism because it plays an important role in our society by keeping us informed of current events with facts and background information.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize journalism because we would not get accurate news.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize journalism because information is necessary to facilitate democracy.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism allows more voices to be heardKeypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism would make it beholden to the current administration and the integrity would decline.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidising journalism would enable more people to broadcast their viewpoint and include more opinions in mainstream journalism.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism acts as a check on public institutions and should be subsidized, as private funds are no longer enough to sustain their mission.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When journalism is subsidized it is less likely they will report anything negative about the source they are receiving funding from therefore distorting the factsKeypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Presentation of information is important and needs help to keep it viable and reliable.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism keeps people informed about what is going on with their governmentKeypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Better journalism is needed to keep our governments in check and the general population in the knowKeypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism might allow companies to pay for opinions, thus introducing biases in reporting.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't subsidize journalism. there are plenty of people who can privately fund journalism if they wish and keep us informed. there are more important causes to invest in than government journalistsKeypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism plays an essential role as watchdog of democracy, and keeping citizens informed. such a valuable industry deserves government subsidization.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is necessary to a free, democratic society and so we must support it by subsidizing the news.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It would help people be more aware of news and the world around themKeypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism makes it impossible to criticize the government in fear of losing a subsidy.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is necessary to any society, to both report the news and keep people informed of important issues they may not be aware of otherwise.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is dead as many new outlets are heavily biased and strive for sensational news rather than accurate newsKeypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize journalism because democracy can only function well if the public is well informed by exposure to a broad spectrum of views.Keypoint: Subsidies will increase the quality of journalism", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism will enable higher salaries be paid to journalists and ensure we keep good, talented newspeople reporting the news.Keypoint: Subsidies will increase the quality of journalism", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism should be completely free and clear of government interventionKeypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Supporting journalism makes sense because people want and need correct factsKeypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism increases journalist pay, allowing for better journalism.Keypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidies can make journalists biased towards the companies subsidising themKeypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism would lead to nothing but manipulating journalists and leaving the general public unable to trust in them.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It would help people be more aware of news and the world around themKeypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: State subsidies for journalism will make journals financially dependent on the government, which will allow the government to influence what news gets reported and how the reporting is done.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is important in this country.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism needs no help, there is a vast array of ways to get information and subsidizing it would only create polarization of informationKeypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize journalism as they are private companies and can raise tons of money without our fear of bad reporting because their company would tank if they reported bad news.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism opens up the door to bias in the media.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This would provide more accurate and less biased opinions.Keypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't subsidize journalism. there are plenty of people who can privately fund journalism if they wish and keep us informed. there are more important causes to invest in than government journalistsKeypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism should be subsidized to make sure every journalist has what they need to investigate stories.Keypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize journalism because we would not get accurate news.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Making journalism subject to the forces of capitalism negatively affects their impartialityKeypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize journalism because it will help guarantee good honest reporting.Keypoint: Subsidies will increase the quality of journalism", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize journalism as it is a key element to investigating wrong doings in societyKeypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism can make enough income to support itself as is seen by the countless successful media outletsKeypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalists need to be funded so they can travel and get the truth about news stories instead of spreading rumors.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism would lead to nothing but manipulating journalists and leaving the general public unable to trust in them.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism should be subsidized as the media is a important part of our democracy as it allows people to be more informed and clued up on all the issues in the world.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Quality journalism is important it's the way we know what the people in power are doing. it's important to fund that.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism should not be subsided as this would call into question whether the media are truly independent and would be a conflict of interest.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Without journalism people have no way of having the information that empower them to make informed voting decisions, making journalism central to democracy and therefore in need of subsidization.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This would provide more accurate and less biased opinions.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Reputable journalists should get the funds they need to get their stories quickly and accurately.Keypoint: Subsidies will increase the quality of journalism", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Quality journalism is important it's the way we know what the people in power are doing. it's important to fund that.Keypoint: Subsidies will increase the quality of journalism", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: High-quality journalism requires time, expertise, and research. all of this requires money.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is incredibly important when it comes to unbiased coverage of our government.Keypoint: Subsidies will increase the quality of journalism", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize journalism because we need to keep local journalism alive so people are aware of what is going on in their community, but small news papers are struggling the most.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is important enough to society to be subsidized because it provides information that people can't get on their own.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Presentation of information is important and needs help to keep it viable and reliable.Keypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism provides information and news so that we can know what is going on outside of our immediate areaKeypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If journalism is funded it would provide wider and better coverage therefore we would be better informedKeypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism needs no help, there is a vast array of ways to get information and subsidizing it would only create polarization of informationKeypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is incredibly important when it comes to unbiased coverage of our government.Keypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Investigative journalism is a cornerstone of democracy because it holds politicians accountable.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Investigative journalism is a cornerstone of democracy because it holds politicians accountable.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is an essential part of democracy and freedom of expression and should not be subsidized by the state.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism would not remain independent if it received subsidies from the government.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism should be subsidised to enable more publications to circulate giving a wider choice of view.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is the only way to create government and other institutional accountability, since investigative journalists are the main people who explore cover ups and corruption, meaning it should be subsidized.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism should be subsidized to ensure people's voices are heard and represented.Keypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism needs funding to continue its important job of delivering information to the public.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize journalism because currently long form, investigative journalism is going away, which threatens the in-depth analysis voters need to understand complex issues.Keypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is a public good, that it has broad social benefits far beyond that between buyer and seller, journalism need the resources to get it producedKeypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are many sectors need subsidizing more than journalism, journalists already make good money, more money to them will be a waste.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism would not remain independent if it received subsidies from the government.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalists need to be funded so they can travel and get the truth about news stories instead of spreading rumors.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not because then more journalists will pop up and could spread false information.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It would make journalism biased, and the content would be authentic, it will lead to lots of fake news.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism would give the government control over itKeypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is a vital source of real information and news to make sure people are properly informed about the world so subsidizing it would help ensure that it continues without bias.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism should not be subsided as this would call into question whether the media are truly independent and would be a conflict of interest.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It would make journalism biased, and the content would be authentic, it will lead to lots of fake news.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism plays an essential role as watchdog of democracy, and keeping citizens informed. such a valuable industry deserves government subsidization.Keypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize journalism because it will undermine editorial independence and make all the news more biased towards the government.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism plays an essential role as watchdog of democracy, and keeping citizens informed. such a valuable industry deserves government subsidization.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It could become partial to whoever paysKeypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is essential for an informed democracy, so better journalism means more effective democracy.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism should be funded by the government as it promotes learning and worldwide communication.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism provides information and news so that we can know what is going on outside of our immediate areaKeypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism subsidized by authoritarian regimes becomes a propaganda machine used to control people, telling them what to think and spreading lies to hide totalitarian regimes' abusesKeypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism should remain a part of the free enterprise system and be supported by those who consume it, not a government subsidy. they should be used for essentials welfare programs only.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidization will allow journals to act on stories that are most important instead of just those that will get them the most money, which means you will get more airing of important but less catchy stories.Keypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing would create biased reporting.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism is unfair. you're basically paying someone to spread your own beliefs.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When you subsidize journalism you are making the reporting agency less likely to report anything bad about the place that is providing the funding. therefore you are getting less accurate news.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism provides people with accurate and up to date information that is essential to a positive well being.Keypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism is a dangerous slope to government interference in the press.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is a public good, that it has broad social benefits far beyond that between buyer and seller, journalism need the resources to get it producedKeypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is necessary to a free, democratic society and so we must support it by subsidizing the news.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing would create biased reporting.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism needs funding to continue its important job of delivering information to the public.Keypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidized journalism could cause the journalists to become biased towards whoever is subsidizing them.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The distribution of knowledge and news is importantKeypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Even the appearance of control through subsidies destroys the credibility of newspapers.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism should be free from bias and present facts no matter what. if subsidized news would. have an automatic bias towards whoever is funding it which leads to inaccurate reporting and doubtful audiences.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize journalism because we need to keep local journalism alive so people are aware of what is going on in their community, but small news papers are struggling the most.Keypoint: Subsidies will increase the quality of journalism", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism opens up the door to bias in the media.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism only succeeds in propping up weak and poorly run organizations which otherwise would soon failKeypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize journalism because it is essential that we have access to news and events around the world. without journalism there will be massive corruption and less intelligence.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism would make it more efficient.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize journalism because democracy can only function well if the public is well informed by exposure to a broad spectrum of views.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Funding comes with overt or covert strings attached, certain criticisms of the government would vanishKeypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Making journalism subject to the forces of capitalism negatively affects their impartialityKeypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism means more resources at the disposal of journalists / news media companies. more resources leads to better-quality journalism overall.Keypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The reporting of news is an important serviceKeypoint: Subsidies will increase the quality of journalism", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism can lead to biased reporting as news outlets will be influenced by those who subsidize themKeypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidized journalism could cause the journalists to become biased towards whoever is subsidizing them.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is incredibly important when it comes to unbiased coverage of our government.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The government is too debt-burdened. it can't afford to subsidize journalism.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It could help improving the quality of production of news events and in turn could benefit the economy by becoming a major distributorKeypoint: Subsidies will increase the quality of journalism", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize journalism so they can do a lot of a better job in reporting news and what they are reporting can be controlledKeypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism should be subsidized to ensure people's voices are heard and represented.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize journalism to help them to cover more stories real stories with facts more efficiently and to reach more people about important issues in our day to day life from politic to the world issuesKeypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If the government subsidized journalism it would give them full control over what we saw and heard leading to secrets and mistrusts.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize journalism because it is a poor use of public money when things like healthcare and education are short of fundingKeypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize journalism because it is a poor use of public money when things like healthcare and education are short of fundingKeypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism lowers the barrier to entry and can allow more fake news and junk reporting to proliferate so to speakKeypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is an essential part of democracy and freedom of expression and should not be subsidized by the state.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism should be subsidized to ensure that the news reported is objective and full of facts as opposed to the subjective views that can be posted by anyone on social media.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize journalism to ensure media has the proper means to get the correct answers to the public.Keypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are more important issues like health and safety to to spend our money on than journalismKeypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need journalists to help keep the government in check and bring to light abuses of power.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize journalism because it plays an important role in our society by keeping us informed of current events with facts and background information.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism should not be subsided as this would call into question whether the media are truly independent and would be a conflict of interest.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism makes it impossible to criticize the government in fear of losing a subsidy.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize journalism because a lot of the journalists spread false newsKeypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Access to information is a crucial right for a voter in a democratic societyKeypoint: Subsidies will increase the quality of journalism", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The reporting of news is an important serviceKeypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: One problem i find with subsidizing it is that when they go after the people in power they could cut their funding so they would be gun shy about reporting that.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Even if the government doesn't gain influence over the reported news, the perception that it does will increase public distrust and prevent journalists from doing their job.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Access to information is a crucial right for a voter in a democratic societyKeypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is the backbone of a free societyKeypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism cannot be unbiased with subsidizationKeypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Access to information is a crucial right for a voter in a democratic societyKeypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Newspapers are dying and need the support.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism provides necessary information to the populationKeypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If the government subsidized journalism it would give them full control over what we saw and heard leading to secrets and mistrusts.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism lowers the barrier to entry and can allow more fake news and junk reporting to proliferate so to speakKeypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Even if the government doesn't gain influence over the reported news, the perception that it does will increase public distrust and prevent journalists from doing their job.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidising journalism will put more resources into good investagative journalism.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism should be subsidize to promote impartial news and rigorous workKeypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism has been an important profession.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Due to the rise of instant gratification online media and the fall of print media, journalism has been struggling economically a lot more in recent times. subsidization will pull it out of the slump.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing everything a person does can drain the pocket overtime.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Knowledge is power and freedom, funding the public's access to high quality, trustworthy journalism is a worthy pursuit to enable a better equipped societyKeypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism being subsidized would be dangerous in that it allows the possibility for one side to push their own agenda rather than seeking out the actual truth to report.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize journalism to ensure media has the proper means to get the correct answers to the public.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism opens up the door to bias in the media.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism could cause them to not report only what the government (or whoever is paying the bill) will allow them to.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is a vital source of real information and news to make sure people are properly informed about the world so subsidizing it would help ensure that it continues without bias.Keypoint: Subsidies will increase the quality of journalism", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Knowledge is power and freedom, funding the public's access to high quality, trustworthy journalism is a worthy pursuit to enable a better equipped societyKeypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism must reach all citizens and the central government must ensure that information reaches all corners of the nationKeypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When journalism is subsidized it is less likely they will report anything negative about the source they are receiving funding from therefore distorting the factsKeypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism is unfair. you're basically paying someone to spread your own beliefs.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is an important trade which keeps the people informed about all major issues.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidies can make journalists biased towards the companies subsidising themKeypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't subsidize journalism. there are plenty of people who can privately fund journalism if they wish and keep us informed. there are more important causes to invest in than government journalistsKeypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize journalism so that we can continue to receive quality media.Keypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It could become partial to whoever paysKeypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism provides people with accurate and up to date information that is essential to a positive well being.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism would eventually lead to biased news and articlesKeypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not because then more journalists will pop up and could spread false information.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is the backbone of a free societyKeypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The distribution of knowledge and news is importantKeypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism increases journalist pay, allowing for better journalism.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism being subsidized would be dangerous in that it allows the possibility for one side to push their own agenda rather than seeking out the actual truth to report.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is important to ensure that the public is able to receive the news.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing everything a person does can drain the pocket overtime.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidization will allow journals to act on stories that are most important instead of just those that will get them the most money, which means you will get more airing of important but less catchy stories.Keypoint: Subsidies will increase the quality of journalism", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need journalists to keep us informed as to what is going on in the worldKeypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize journalism so they can do a lot of a better job in reporting news and what they are reporting can be controlledKeypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is an important part of our political system; it keeps citizens informed and exposes government corruption.Keypoint: Subsidies will increase the quality of journalism", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is important to ensure that the population is informed about important issues.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is important to ensure that the public is able to receive the news.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize journalism so they can do a lot of a better job in reporting news and what they are reporting can be controlledKeypoint: Subsidies will increase the quality of journalism", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize journalism because a lot of the journalists spread false newsKeypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is a public good, that it has broad social benefits far beyond that between buyer and seller, journalism need the resources to get it producedKeypoint: Subsidies will increase the quality of journalism", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If journalism was subsidised it would encourage more inaccurate, poor quality work.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize journalism because it is a poor use of public money when things like healthcare and education are short of fundingKeypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The journalism won't be able to be trusted. it could be biased depending on who does the subsidising.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When journalism is subsidized it is less likely they will report anything negative about the source they are receiving funding from therefore distorting the factsKeypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Newspapers are dying and need the support.Keypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is more important than ever in an era of fake news and social media.Keypoint: Subsidies will increase the quality of journalism", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If journalism was subsidised it would encourage more inaccurate, poor quality work.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism could cause them to not report only what the government (or whoever is paying the bill) will allow them to.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If journalism is funded it would provide wider and better coverage therefore we would be better informedKeypoint: Subsidy increases objectivity in reporting", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We already are in high enough debt, we don't need to make it worse be subsidizing pointless things.Keypoint: Journalism is like every other business and if it is not sustainable it should fail", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism should not be subsidized because subsidies could too easily be allotted according to political beliefs.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism allows more voices to be heardKeypoint: A subsidy is important to make journalism viable", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism will lead to corruption, i.e. print the story the way i told you to or your funding is cut.Keypoint: It is preferable to spend the money elsewhere", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Journalism is necessary to any society, to both report the news and keep people informed of important issues they may not be aware of otherwise.Keypoint: Journalism is important to information-spreading/accountability", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing journalism will lead to corruption, i.e. print the story the way i told you to or your funding is cut.Keypoint: Government intervention has the risk of inserting bias/harming objectivity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - } - ] -} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/tasks/task1306_kpa_keypoint_matching_space_exploration_topic.json b/tasks/task1306_kpa_keypoint_matching_space_exploration_topic.json deleted file mode 100644 index 67d363d96..000000000 --- a/tasks/task1306_kpa_keypoint_matching_space_exploration_topic.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,3058 +0,0 @@ -{ - "Contributors": [ - "Arjun Ashok" - ], - "Source": [ - "ArgKP (https://github.com/IBM/KPA_2021_shared_task)" - ], - "Definition": "The input contains an argument and a keypoint on the topic \"We should subsidize space exploration\", separated by \"\".Your task is to answer if the keypoint matches the argument and summarizes exactly what the argument means, in the context of this topic.", - "Categories": [ - "Classification -> Verification -> Summary Verification", - "Text Comparison" - ], - "Domains": [ - "Reviews", - "Law", - "Government and Politics", - "Dialogue" - ], - "Input_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Output_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Instruction_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Positive Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize space exploration as we have learnt a lot and can advance through technologyKeypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that we should subsidize space exploration as we have learnt a lot and can advance through technology" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration advances the frontiers of mankind, and could well discover new resources that will be invaluable due to the depletion of those on earth.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that space exploration advances the frontiers of mankind, and could well discover new resources that will be invaluable due to the depletion of those on earth." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should because we can still learn so much about space.Keypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that we should because we can still learn so much about space." - } - ], - "Negative Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a vastly costly exercise that would drain much needed finances for other more worthwhile projects if it were subsidised.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that space exploration is a vastly costly exercise that would drain much needed finances for other more worthwhile projects if it were subsidised." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize space exploration because the money should be used for more important things like medical researchKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that we should not subsidize space exploration because the money should be used for more important things like medical research" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is essential to lead the way into discovering new technologies and it also leads to countries co-operating with each other on an international level.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that space exploration is essential to lead the way into discovering new technologies and it also leads to countries co-operating with each other on an international level." - } - ], - "Instances": [ - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a costly waste of money; that money could be much better spent elsewhere.Keypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration has the potential to bring an economy worth trillions . we should do all in our power to help that become a reality.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is morally wrong to fund space exploration when we have people here on earth that we need to help first.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The costs of space exploration are best left to private enterprise since there are better uses for public moneyKeypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Spcae exploration is very expensive and there are millions of people suffering who would benefit greatly from the money that is spent subsidizing space exploration.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a way to discover new worlds therefore we should put more money to explore the universeKeypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are more immediate needs here on earth, there's no reason to explore space. we have to care for what we have already.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration can tell us so much about the world that we live in and help us to identify potential threats that the human race may need to prepare for.Keypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are more immediate needs here on earth, there's no reason to explore space. we have to care for what we have already.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize space exploration as there is a need to continue to develop the technology to enable mankind to survive on earth and elsewhere.Keypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidized space exploration is essential as it helps with wider scientific developmentKeypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration technology can lead to benefits here on earth. the ballpoint pen was invented by a space program and now people everywhere use them!Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are many more practical realms of scientific inquiry that need our support more urgently.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should quit subsidizing the space exploration program as it is a huge waste of money, which could be used to do a lot of good here on earth.Keypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration subsidizes should be stopped as the millions of dollars being spent on this exploration could be used to help the millions of people living in the united statesKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize space exploration because the money spent could be put to better use such as hunger and finding homes for our homeless.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is too frivolous to spend tax dollars on when people are starving.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration needs our support to help us understand the universe and our place in it.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The money spent on space exploration would be better used to combat problems on earthKeypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: No one owns space and it's bigger than imaginable. there's no reason to race to and dump money into space exploration right now. more important causes like our starving or impoverished citizens come first.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Humans are explorers, it's built into us, it's our destiny and it's therefore within our interests to spend money and resources to discover what's out there.Keypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is vital that we have the ability to explore other worlds. the earth is rapidly running out of room and resources, only through exploration can we find more places to live.Keypoint: Space exploration is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize space exploration because there are far more important things to spend public money on closer to home such as healthcare, education and transport infrastructureKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration has the ability to solve the problem of limited materials on earthKeypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is vital that we have the ability to explore other worlds. the earth is rapidly running out of room and resources, only through exploration can we find more places to live.Keypoint: Space exploration is necessary for the future survival of humanity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration should be subsidized as it brings innovation and scientific developmentKeypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is incredibly costly and the burden should not be placed on taxpayers.Keypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is nice but we need to deal with things here on earth first, such as climate changeKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The technology we get from space exploration alone is worth the cost of itKeypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are much more worthy causes to invest in than space exploration, which benefits nobody.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is expensive, dangerous, and there really doesn't seem to be a point to it.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a drain on public funds, money could instead be spent on health care or education.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should because we can still learn so much about space.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is literally burning money and the benefits are not clear other than promoting a countries powerKeypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It can open doors for advancement and should be supported by the government.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is an important tool to better understand the universe we live in.Keypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Our survival as a species depends on expanding into space so it should be subsidised.Keypoint: Space exploration is necessary for the future survival of humanity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is an expenditure so esoteric, it does not justify its hefty cost to the public.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration gives us an advantage over other countries, allowing us to improve satellite placement that can help protect from combat enemies.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is a lot to be learned from space exploration which has already produced many lifesaving inventionsKeypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It will help future generations when the earth diesKeypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration can allow for satellite placement to warn of weather as well as the actions of countries that intend to cause harm.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidized space exploration is essential as it helps with wider scientific developmentKeypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize space exploration because we already spend enough on it. we can always have private companies like elon musk pay for additional space explorationKeypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration technology can lead to benefits here on earth. the ballpoint pen was invented by a space program and now people everywhere use them!Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is expensive and money should not be wasted on something that will probably never improve life on earth.Keypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is the future of our lives and should be continued.Keypoint: Space exploration is necessary for the future survival of humanity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We have much bigger issues that need our money.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize space exploration because the money should be used for more important things like medical researchKeypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are already too many problems in the world that could use the resources more than space.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize space exploration because that money could be spend on much more pressing matters like helping the homeless and research into cures for cancer.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidized space exploration shouldn't be allowed because it's expensiveKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Exploring the earth is more important than what's outside of it and should receive the subsidy instead.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mankind will eventually have to colonize space to avoid extinction. we should start working on it immediatelyKeypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is important and has led to ground-breaking technologies and co-operations between countries.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We just don't have enough excess funds yo support this type of exploration.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration can lead to new discoveries and might save planet earth in the futureKeypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is necessary to expand the frontiers of the human race, possibly even laying the groundwork for future colonization.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It costs too much money to send space ships to other planetsKeypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration may be the only future for mankindKeypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Spcae exploration is very expensive and there are millions of people suffering who would benefit greatly from the money that is spent subsidizing space exploration.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't subsidize space exploration because it is too expensive for little resultKeypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The universe outside of our planet holds the most fascinating mysteries, of course we should explore it and learn, it is ignorant and arrogant to think this planet is all that mattersKeypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration should be subsidized because the information learned from it could provide useful to our planet.Keypoint: Space exploration is necessary for the future survival of humanity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Our survival as a species depends on expanding into space so it should be subsidised.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Humans shouldn't colonize space until we learn to care for earthKeypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing space exploration takes money away from more important issues.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is too frivolous to spend tax dollars on when people are starving.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We have much bigger issues that need our money.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration has a big rule to play in the progress of science and we have an obligation to support it.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is wasted money. no one knows what is out there, and the money could go to proven issues on earth.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is is the next frontier for human life and needs to be subsidized to defer some of the costs.Keypoint: Space exploration is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many of the technological advances brought about by space exploration have eventual benefits for society in general.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is important and has led to ground-breaking technologies and co-operations between countries.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize space exploration because we already spend enough on it. we can always have private companies like elon musk pay for additional space explorationKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The technology developed for space exploration has also had uses in regular life - subsidizing space exploration would also have positive trickle down effects.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is vital to the future of humanity, when we destroy this planet, we will need to have an alternativeKeypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The exploration of space can only improve on the knowledge of things here on earth as we learn more and more about the makeup of the universe.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize space exploration as there is a need to continue to develop the technology to enable mankind to survive on earth and elsewhere.Keypoint: Space exploration is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to subsidize space exploration in order to find an inhabitable planet we can live on when we finally destroy the one we live on now. supply housing forKeypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize space exploration because we already spend enough on it. we can always have private companies like elon musk pay for additional space explorationKeypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is estimated that the economic value of every dollar spent on the space exploration program is worth $8-$10, this makes it a very sound investment that advances technology, science and medicine.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is important. we need a solution to the population, environment, energy and natural resources problems we face on earth.Keypoint: Space exploration is necessary for the future survival of humanity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration costs too much money that could be spent on better thing such as helping the poor in society.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize space exploration because is important discover other resourcesKeypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is incredibly important for future scientific advancements and must be funded properly.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a waste of money that could be used to feed peopleKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We have so much to learn from space exploration, secrets of the universe that could change the way we understand our existence, it is a worthy exploitKeypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is vital to continued scientific discovery.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Exploration of space is important to gaining knowledge of the universeKeypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is horrifically expensive, and the money would be far better spent on more earth bound needs, such as medical research.Keypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The money spent on subsidizing space exploration could be better spent on other things that help all of societyKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration provides important scientific discoveriesKeypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Because of overpopulation space exploration must be subsidized so that humanity can find a new home since it has destroyed earthKeypoint: Space exploration is necessary for the future survival of humanity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We have so many issues in the world, its silly to funnel more money into space.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We have too many problems here on our own planet to worry about putting money into searching space.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We just don't have enough excess funds yo support this type of exploration.Keypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration provides the basis for scientific development in many ways and should be subsidizedKeypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Exploration of space is important to gaining knowledge of the universeKeypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is vital that we have the ability to explore other worlds. the earth is rapidly running out of room and resources, only through exploration can we find more places to live.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't subsidize space exploration because the money could be better spent on other things such as the nhs or the social care systemKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Exploration of space has not produced any tangible benefits yet, so funding should be discontinuedKeypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidized space exploration is a waste of money better used on other things and the money should be found by the large space agencies.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It's luxury spending, maybe better to invest the money in healthcare or education.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration must be supported because helping us, humans to keep our planet earth safe and secure.Keypoint: Space exploration is necessary for the future survival of humanity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is useful for all the innovations it bringsKeypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a waste of money when there are bigger problems on this planet that should be taken are of firtKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize it because we one day may need to find a place for new resourcesKeypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidiize space exploration as by understanding other planets and their ecosystems, we may be able to understand our own planet more.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Because of overpopulation space exploration must be subsidized so that humanity can find a new home since it has destroyed earthKeypoint: Space exploration is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Government should keep money for space exploration to find new locations to live and/or remove dangerous waste from earth.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is not yielding anything useful to society and should not be subsidized.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are many more practical realms of scientific inquiry that need our support more urgently.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration should not be subsidized because it is not affordable. there is not enough money available in mostcountries to even support health care and security without space exploration too.Keypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidising space exploration is a waste of money that can be put to use in other ways that would actually help societyKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing space exploration will help us to learn more about the areas outside of earth's atmosphere and, perhaps, teach us things that will improve our quality of life here on earth.Keypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration isn't necessary so the money could go to much more useful things such as education for children and providing health care for people.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a field which the private sector is fully capable to fulfill, as elon musk shows us.Keypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is incredibly important for future scientific advancements and must be funded properly.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration encourages inventions beneficial to our everyday lives, as well as economic stimulation.Keypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to find a new planet with resources before we use ours up, putting more into space exploration would help accomplish this.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a waste and we need to tend to our own planet's needs first.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize space exploration as there are far more important and urgent issues to deal with on earth at this time.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing space exploration will help us to learn more about the areas outside of earth's atmosphere and, perhaps, teach us things that will improve our quality of life here on earth.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The universe outside of our planet holds the most fascinating mysteries, of course we should explore it and learn, it is ignorant and arrogant to think this planet is all that mattersKeypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is no urgent need for us to be exploring space. we don't need to waste our tax dollars on this right now. if there's any danger to our world then maybe it would be a good idea but there isn't.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are better things to spend money onKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration has produced nothing useful, the funding would be better used elsewhereKeypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize space exploration because it can help provide us with education of the universe around usKeypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize space exploration because we should concentrate on fixing earth firstKeypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize space exploration because the money spent could be put to better use such as hunger and finding homes for our homeless.Keypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should be concentrating on and spending money on making our world a better place then out exploring other worlds and space needlessly.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The money used on space exploration could be used on alternative initiatives such as an health and combating poverty.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration has a huge part in the future progress of humanity.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is morally wrong to fund space exploration when we have people here on earth that we need to help first.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration needs our support to help us understand the universe and our place in it.Keypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are already too many problems in the world that could use the resources more than space.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing space exploration is extremely expensive and takes money away from projects that need it now.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration should be subsidized as it allows us to try and find an alternative place to live if we destroy our own planet.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize space exploration as there are more than enough companies with the finances to do this and who will eventually benefit from these developments.Keypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space mining could help us find valuable minerals that are usefulKeypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize space exploration for reserach in other planetsKeypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is estimated that the economic value of every dollar spent on the space exploration program is worth $8-$10, this makes it a very sound investment that advances technology, science and medicine.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration provides important scientific discoveriesKeypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Knowledge is power and each new discovery can be applied to countless other things that can benefit our daily livesKeypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a costly waste of money; that money could be much better spent elsewhere.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidies are a zero sum game, by subsidizing space exploration we are neglecting more important fields such as education or affordable housing.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration could serve as an insurance policy should something devastating happen to our planet.Keypoint: Space exploration is necessary for the future survival of humanity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is necessary as we continue to make our earth more and more uninhabitable.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Money can be spent on more lucrative things such as feeding the hungry and providing homes. subsidizing space exploration can take away from that.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration costs too much money that could be spent on better thing such as helping the poor in society.Keypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is an extravagance in this era of poverty and injustice, we should concentrate government money on those areas instead.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It costs too much money to send space ships to other planetsKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exporation requires vast sums of money that would be better spent closer to home on things like healthcare and schoolsKeypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration encourages inventions beneficial to our everyday lives, as well as economic stimulation.Keypoint: Space exploration is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration can provide valuable scientific information, and should be subsidized to ensure its continuationKeypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is an extravagance in this era of poverty and injustice, we should concentrate government money on those areas instead.Keypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidies are a zero sum game, by subsidizing space exploration we are neglecting more important fields such as education or affordable housing.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is expensive, dangerous, and there really doesn't seem to be a point to it.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is expensive, dangerous, and there really doesn't seem to be a point to it.Keypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Exploration of space has not produced any tangible benefits yet, so funding should be discontinuedKeypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are so many other problems in the world such as sickness and poverty. money should be used for those, not for getting to a rock in a distant place.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration should be subsidized because the information learned from it could provide useful to our planet.Keypoint: Space exploration is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is such a costly exercise that subsidising would put an enormous strain on any country's finances that can be ill afforded when there are so many more causes that need supporting on earth.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidising space exploration would enable more discoveries to be made.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration should be subsidized as it allows us to try and find an alternative place to live if we destroy our own planet.Keypoint: Space exploration is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidising space exploration would enable more discoveries to be made.Keypoint: Space exploration is necessary for the future survival of humanity", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The money spent on space exploration would be better spent on improving life on earth.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is very costly and the money could be spent elsewhere for something more beneficial for the societyKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is vital that we have the ability to explore other worlds. the earth is rapidly running out of room and resources, only through exploration can we find more places to live.Keypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to subsidize space exploration so we can find somewhere for the human race to go when we finally get done destroying our planet.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is is the next frontier for human life and needs to be subsidized to defer some of the costs.Keypoint: Space exploration is necessary for the future survival of humanity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is nothing but a waste of money that could be used to help people on hearthKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There doesn't seem to be a broader point to exploring space other than to explore - government subsidies should go to programs that benefit people on earth in the present.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidized space exploration is a waste of money better used on other things and the money should be found by the large space agencies.Keypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a very expensive undertaking that produces little benefit to societyKeypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing space exploration takes money away from more important issues.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is plenty of private funding available for space exploration; thus, a government subsidy is unnecessary.Keypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing space exploration will help us to learn more about the areas outside of earth's atmosphere and, perhaps, teach us things that will improve our quality of life here on earth.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration has made satellites possible.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a vastly costly exercise that would drain much needed finances for other more worthwhile projects if it were subsidised.Keypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should be concentrating on and spending money on making our world a better place then out exploring other worlds and space needlessly.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize space exploration because it is beneficial for educational purposesKeypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a drain on public funds, money could instead be spent on health care or education.Keypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is important to know what else is in the universe for protection and exploratory purposes.Keypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mankind will eventually have to colonize space to avoid extinction. we should start working on it immediatelyKeypoint: Space exploration is necessary for the future survival of humanity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Technologies developed for space exploration have lead to the development of other very valuable technologies.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Spend that money on things that truly matter right now, that can save lives, promote sustainability of this planet and make it a better place. that needs to be prioritized before we spend a fortune out in spaceKeypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we subsidised space exploration we could learn more about our own planet from space in wys that we couldn't learn about it from here on earth.Keypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: In times of austerity, no government can afford the costly exercise of subsidising space exploration.Keypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We and learn as much as we can. need to continue to explore outer spaceKeypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We have so much to learn from space exploration, secrets of the universe that could change the way we understand our existence, it is a worthy exploitKeypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is good to invest in space technology to explore and know as well as for technological developmentKeypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration can lead to new discoveries and might save planet earth in the futureKeypoint: Space exploration is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mankind will eventually have to colonize space to avoid extinction. we should start working on it immediatelyKeypoint: Space exploration is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to find a new planet with resources before we use ours up, putting more into space exploration would help accomplish this.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It will help future generations when the earth diesKeypoint: Space exploration is necessary for the future survival of humanity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Eventually we will need to seek out other planets to settle on in cases of emergencyKeypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is a lot to be learned from space exploration which has already produced many lifesaving inventionsKeypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration should be subsidized as it brings innovation and scientific developmentKeypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are better things to spend money onKeypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing space exploration is extremely expensive and takes money away from projects that need it now.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is useful for all the innovations it bringsKeypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a very expensive undertaking that produces little benefit to societyKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidiize space exploration as by understanding other planets and their ecosystems, we may be able to understand our own planet more.Keypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration has the ability to solve the problem of limited materials on earthKeypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is expensive and money should not be wasted on something that will probably never improve life on earth.Keypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration should not be subsidized because it is not affordable. there is not enough money available in mostcountries to even support health care and security without space exploration too.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize space exploration because it is very expensive in terms of the minute benefit we as a nation get out of it.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is invaluable because it may help us to find solutions for global warming or even planets that can sustain human life.Keypoint: Space exploration is necessary for the future survival of humanity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The budget for we must cooperate with subsidize space exploration is very high and negativeKeypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are much more important things to spend money on; space exploration is a low priority and should not be subsidizedKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is estimated that the economic value of every dollar spent on the space exploration program is worth $8-$10, this makes it a very sound investment that advances technology, science and medicine.Keypoint: Space exploration is necessary for the future survival of humanity", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are more important things to spend public funds on such as health care, housing and education.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not be spending money on exploring what is beyond the planet when we need those government funds so badly now on this planetKeypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration should be subsidized as it allows us to try and find an alternative place to live if we destroy our own planet.Keypoint: Space exploration is necessary for the future survival of humanity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Technologies developed for space exploration have lead to the development of other very valuable technologies.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is too costly and the money can be spent on urgent needs.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The country only has a certain amount of money, and it would be used better to help people here on earth than to explore space.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: More money needs to be spent on improving the world we live on, reducing poverty, pollution, crime and disease rather than going off to places that are no use to humans at all.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should susidize space exploration because it could help find useful things needed on earth for the worldKeypoint: Space exploration is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is literally burning money and the benefits are not clear other than promoting a countries powerKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a waste of money and it would be better spent elsewhereKeypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Because of overpopulation space exploration must be subsidized so that humanity can find a new home since it has destroyed earthKeypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize space exploration because is important discover other resourcesKeypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration will pave the way to find us a new place to inhabit, in case we need to leave earth for whatever reason in the future.Keypoint: Space exploration is necessary for the future survival of humanity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidising space exploration would enable more discoveries to be made.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Exploration of space has not produced any tangible benefits yet, so funding should be discontinuedKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The costs of space exploration are best left to private enterprise since there are better uses for public moneyKeypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a waste of taxpayers money and should be funded by private enterprises.Keypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration can allow for satellite placement to warn of weather as well as the actions of countries that intend to cause harm.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize space exploration for reserach in other planetsKeypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration has made satellites possible.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we subsidised space exploration we could learn more about our own planet from space in wys that we couldn't learn about it from here on earth.Keypoint: Space exploration is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is horrifically expensive, and the money would be far better spent on more earth bound needs, such as medical research.Keypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We just don't have enough excess funds yo support this type of exploration.Keypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Money can be spent on more lucrative things such as feeding the hungry and providing homes. subsidizing space exploration can take away from that.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidize space exploration is waste of money and such a money should be invested in people.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize space exploration to find what information is available in our solar system.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If space exploration was subsidised then we could learn a lot more about it and this would be beneficial for the world.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not not subsidize space exploration since all that money could be used to improve earth.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to subsidize space exploration because there are so many mysteries of the universe that need to be explored for the betterment of mankind.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration will pave the way to find us a new place to inhabit, in case we need to leave earth for whatever reason in the future.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Eventually we will need to seek out other planets to settle on in cases of emergencyKeypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: More money needs to be spent on improving the world we live on, reducing poverty, pollution, crime and disease rather than going off to places that are no use to humans at all.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is horrifically expensive, and the money would be far better spent on more earth bound needs, such as medical research.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is estimated that the economic value of every dollar spent on the space exploration program is worth $8-$10, this makes it a very sound investment that advances technology, science and medicine.Keypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a waste of time and money and we should focus on sustaining earthKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration could serve as an insurance policy should something devastating happen to our planet.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are much more important things to spend money on; space exploration is a low priority and should not be subsidizedKeypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration has spillover technology that will benefit us on earth.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a waste of time and money and we should focus on sustaining earthKeypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We learn more about science and our environment/ universe with space exploration. this also creates more jobs.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize space exploration because it is the future of our species at stake. the earth is slowly dying due to global warming and it is necessary to find our next livable planet to move toKeypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are so many other problems in the world such as sickness and poverty. money should be used for those, not for getting to a rock in a distant place.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is very costly and the money could be spent elsewhere for something more beneficial for the societyKeypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration should be subsidized because the information learned from it could provide useful to our planet.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a waste of money that could be used to feed peopleKeypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't subsidize space exploration because it is too expensive for little resultKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize space exploration because earth is quickly becoming uninhabitable and drained of resources. our survival depends on finding somewhere else to go.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This is too expensive and we have more pressing issues down at earthKeypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration helps us better understand the universe we live in.Keypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize space exploration because that money could be spend on much more pressing matters like helping the homeless and research into cures for cancer.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Spend that money on things that truly matter right now, that can save lives, promote sustainability of this planet and make it a better place. that needs to be prioritized before we spend a fortune out in spaceKeypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration can lead to new technologies and innovations therefore we should subsidise it with public funds.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is very expensive and the government should be spending the money on more important things.Keypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is plenty of private funding available for space exploration; thus, a government subsidy is unnecessary.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is nothing that can come from space research that will help the country so why waste so much money?Keypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration gives insight into our world and other planets which could be invaluable.Keypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is too costly and there aren't enough tangible benefits to justify subsidizationKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Exploring the earth is more important than what's outside of it and should receive the subsidy instead.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is vital that we have the ability to explore other worlds. the earth is rapidly running out of room and resources, only through exploration can we find more places to live.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't subsidize space exploration because it can be very costlyKeypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is estimated that the economic value of every dollar spent on the space exploration program is worth $8-$10, this makes it a very sound investment that advances technology, science and medicine.Keypoint: Space exploration is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a useless project that only matters for a small number of scientist. there are more important projects to be subsidized for the progress of humanity than thisKeypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are so many things in this world left to discover, so we should definitely support space research.Keypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This is too expensive and we have more pressing issues down at earthKeypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidising space exploration would enable more discoveries to be made.Keypoint: Space exploration is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing space exploration will help us to learn more about the areas outside of earth's atmosphere and, perhaps, teach us things that will improve our quality of life here on earth.Keypoint: Space exploration is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration gives insight into our world and other planets which could be invaluable.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is too costly and the money can be spent on urgent needs.Keypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration encourages inventions beneficial to our everyday lives, as well as economic stimulation.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize space exploration as there is a need to continue to develop the technology to enable mankind to survive on earth and elsewhere.Keypoint: Space exploration is necessary for the future survival of humanity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration must be supported because helping us, humans to keep our planet earth safe and secure.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize space exploration as there are more than enough companies with the finances to do this and who will eventually benefit from these developments.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space explorations can help education us about the universe around us and lead to extraordinary discoveriesKeypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The exploration of space can only improve on the knowledge of things here on earth as we learn more and more about the makeup of the universe.Keypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration need only be done by the private sector.Keypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is very costly and the money could be spent elsewhere for something more beneficial for the societyKeypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration isn't necessary so the money could go to much more useful things such as education for children and providing health care for people.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a costly waste of money; that money could be much better spent elsewhere.Keypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When we subsidize space exploration we contribute to the advancement of mankind through science, which is a good thing.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration gives us an advantage over other countries, allowing us to improve satellite placement that can help protect from combat enemies.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Spcae exploration is very expensive and there are millions of people suffering who would benefit greatly from the money that is spent subsidizing space exploration.Keypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize space exploration because its too expensiveKeypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing space exploration is extremely expensive and takes money away from projects that need it now.Keypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not be spending money on exploring what is beyond the planet when we need those government funds so badly now on this planetKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidize space exploration is waste of money and such a money should be invested in people.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing space exploration will help us to learn more about the areas outside of earth's atmosphere and, perhaps, teach us things that will improve our quality of life here on earth.Keypoint: Space exploration is necessary for the future survival of humanity", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is too costly and the money can be spent on urgent needs.Keypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a vastly costly exercise that would drain much needed finances for other more worthwhile projects if it were subsidised.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration can lead to new technologies and innovations therefore we should subsidise it with public funds.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a field which the private sector is fully capable to fulfill, as elon musk shows us.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is such a costly exercise that subsidising would put an enormous strain on any country's finances that can be ill afforded when there are so many more causes that need supporting on earth.Keypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is too costly and there aren't enough tangible benefits to justify subsidizationKeypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should susidize space exploration because it could help find useful things needed on earth for the worldKeypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize space exploration to find what information is available in our solar system.Keypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is very expensive and the government should be spending the money on more important things.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is too costly and the money can be spent on urgent needs.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize space exploration as we have learnt a lot and can advance through technologyKeypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize space exploration because its too expensiveKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is not yielding anything useful to society and should not be subsidized.Keypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is incredibly costly and the burden should not be placed on taxpayers.Keypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't subsidize space exploration because the money could be better spent on other things such as the nhs or the social care systemKeypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We have too many problems here on our own planet to worry about putting money into searching space.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration may be the only future for mankindKeypoint: Space exploration is necessary for the future survival of humanity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is nothing but a waste of money that could be used to help people on hearthKeypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration provides the basis for scientific development in many ways and should be subsidizedKeypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When we subsidize space exploration we contribute to the advancement of mankind through science, which is a good thing.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to subsidize space exploration in order to find an inhabitable planet we can live on when we finally destroy the one we live on now. supply housing forKeypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We have more important things to spend money onKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Obligatory of all governments in the world must be subsidizing space exploration because we will learn how to defend our own planet.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize space exploration because it increases the knowledge of the universe we are inKeypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Our world will not hold all the people much longer. subsidizing space exploration will enable us to possibly colonize other worlds.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize space exploration because the money spent could be put to better use such as hunger and finding homes for our homeless.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize space exploration so we can continue to learn about our universe and any threats or benefits it offers.Keypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: No one owns space and it's bigger than imaginable. there's no reason to race to and dump money into space exploration right now. more important causes like our starving or impoverished citizens come first.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We have more important things to spend money onKeypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize space exploration because it is very expensive in terms of the minute benefit we as a nation get out of it.Keypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration can provide valuable scientific information, and should be subsidized to ensure its continuationKeypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize space exploration because it can help provide us with education of the universe around usKeypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize space exploration as it is important to learn more about the universe and investigate the possibility of other life forms.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration should be subsidized as it will benefit us in the future with technology advancements.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space will one day be an important resource so we need to further explore it.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Our world will not hold all the people much longer. subsidizing space exploration will enable us to possibly colonize other worlds.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration can lead to new discoveries and might save planet earth in the futureKeypoint: Space exploration is necessary for the future survival of humanity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space is the last unexplored frontier, and has many possibilities for scientific advancementKeypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is very costly and the money could be spent elsewhere for something more beneficial for the societyKeypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are more important things to spend public funds on such as health care, housing and education.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exporation requires vast sums of money that would be better spent closer to home on things like healthcare and schoolsKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a good adventure. our planet is in a future risk of extinct and we should best prepare our refuge in space explorationKeypoint: Space exploration is necessary for the future survival of humanity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a drain on public funds, money could instead be spent on health care or education.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a waste and we need to tend to our own planet's needs first.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize space exploration as there are far more important and urgent issues to deal with on earth at this time.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There doesn't seem to be a broader point to exploring space other than to explore - government subsidies should go to programs that benefit people on earth in the present.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Because of overpopulation space exploration must be subsidized so that humanity can find a new home since it has destroyed earthKeypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we subsidised space exploration we could learn more about our own planet from space in wys that we couldn't learn about it from here on earth.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize space exploration because the money should be used for more important things like medical researchKeypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is important. we need a solution to the population, environment, energy and natural resources problems we face on earth.Keypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize space exploration because it is the future of our species at stake. the earth is slowly dying due to global warming and it is necessary to find our next livable planet to move toKeypoint: Space exploration is necessary for the future survival of humanity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we subsidised space exploration we could learn more about our own planet from space in wys that we couldn't learn about it from here on earth.Keypoint: Space exploration is necessary for the future survival of humanity", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When we subsidize space exploration we contribute to the advancement of mankind through science, which is a good thing.Keypoint: Space exploration is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize space exploration because we need to know if there are other things in the universe that may some day harm the earth.Keypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is literally burning money and the benefits are not clear other than promoting a countries powerKeypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mankind has so much more to learn about physics and the nature of things through space exploration that it must be subsidized.Keypoint: Space exploration is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Humans are explorers, it's built into us, it's our destiny and it's therefore within our interests to spend money and resources to discover what's out there.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is vital to see if there are other planets that are habitableKeypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration encourages inventions beneficial to our everyday lives, as well as economic stimulation.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is nice but we need to deal with things here on earth first, such as climate changeKeypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mankind will eventually have to colonize space to avoid extinction. we should start working on it immediatelyKeypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The money spent on space exploration would be better spent on improving life on earth.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to find minerals that are becoming scarce on our planetKeypoint: Space exploration is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We have better things to spend money on than space explorationKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration has spillover technology that will benefit us on earth.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Knowledge is power and each new discovery can be applied to countless other things that can benefit our daily livesKeypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: In times of austerity, no government can afford the costly exercise of subsidising space exploration.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration should be subsidized because the information learned from it could provide useful to our planet.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mankind has so much more to learn about physics and the nature of things through space exploration that it must be subsidized.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many scientific discoveries have come from space exploration.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing space exploration is extremely expensive and takes money away from projects that need it now.Keypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration has produced nothing useful, the funding would be better used elsewhereKeypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many of the technological advances brought about by space exploration have eventual benefits for society in general.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to subsidize space exploration because there are so many mysteries of the universe that need to be explored for the betterment of mankind.Keypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a good adventure. our planet is in a future risk of extinct and we should best prepare our refuge in space explorationKeypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is necessary as we continue to make our earth more and more uninhabitable.Keypoint: Space exploration is necessary for the future survival of humanity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mankind will eventually have to colonize space to avoid extinction. we should start working on it immediatelyKeypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is no urgent need for us to be exploring space. we don't need to waste our tax dollars on this right now. if there's any danger to our world then maybe it would be a good idea but there isn't.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize space exploration because there are far more important things to spend public money on closer to home such as healthcare, education and transport infrastructureKeypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are much more worthy causes to invest in than space exploration, which benefits nobody.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration subsidizes should be stopped as the millions of dollars being spent on this exploration could be used to help the millions of people living in the united statesKeypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We learn more about science and our environment/ universe with space exploration. this also creates more jobs.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This would enable even further exploration into unknown universes and discoveries we could not have previously imagined if there were more money via subsidies to space exploration projects.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are more practical needs, like housing and infrastructure, in which we should invest.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a good adventure. our planet is in a future risk of extinct and we should best prepare our refuge in space explorationKeypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a useless project that only matters for a small number of scientist. there are more important projects to be subsidized for the progress of humanity than thisKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mankind has so much more to learn about physics and the nature of things through space exploration that it must be subsidized.Keypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a waste of money when there are bigger problems on this planet that should be taken are of firtKeypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidising space exploration is a waste of money that can be put to use in other ways that would actually help societyKeypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We learn more about science and our environment/ universe with space exploration. this also creates more jobs.Keypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are so many things in this world left to discover, so we should definitely support space research.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Because of overpopulation space exploration must be subsidized so that humanity can find a new home since it has destroyed earthKeypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a waste of money and it would be better spent elsewhereKeypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration advances the frontiers of mankind, and could well discover new resources that will be invaluable due to the depletion of those on earth.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is wasted money. no one knows what is out there, and the money could go to proven issues on earth.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space is the last unexplored frontier, and has many possibilities for scientific advancementKeypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The money used on space exploration could be used on alternative initiatives such as an health and combating poverty.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nasa and other space organizations have developed many useful technologies in the pursuit of space exploration and should be subsidized.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration should be subsidized as it allows us to try and find an alternative place to live if we destroy our own planet.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize more space exploration because it is our future. we can use this exploration to learn about our solar system, galaxy, and increase our innovation.Keypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is important to know what else is in the universe for protection and exploratory purposes.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The budget for we must cooperate with subsidize space exploration is very high and negativeKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is the future of our lives and should be continued.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We must continue to support space exploration economically, we must always have vision to the future and see better thingsKeypoint: Space exploration is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration should not be subsidized because it is not affordable. there is not enough money available in mostcountries to even support health care and security without space exploration too.Keypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize more space exploration because it is our future. we can use this exploration to learn about our solar system, galaxy, and increase our innovation.Keypoint: Space exploration is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space mining could help us find valuable minerals that are usefulKeypoint: Space exploration is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is good to invest in space technology to explore and know as well as for technological developmentKeypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize space exploration as it is important for the world to know what else is out there.Keypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration costs too much money that could be spent on better thing such as helping the poor in society.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration should be subsidized as it allows us to try and find an alternative place to live if we destroy our own planet.Keypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidized space exploration shouldn't be allowed because it's expensiveKeypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration has a huge part in the future progress of humanity.Keypoint: Space exploration is necessary for the future survival of humanity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We have so many issues in the world, its silly to funnel more money into space.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is expensive and money should not be wasted on something that will probably never improve life on earth.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space explorations can help education us about the universe around us and lead to extraordinary discoveriesKeypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize space exploration because we need to know if there are other things in the universe that may some day harm the earth.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is invaluable because it may help us to find solutions for global warming or even planets that can sustain human life.Keypoint: Space exploration is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is essential to lead the way into discovering new technologies and it also leads to countries co-operating with each other on an international level.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is wasted money. no one knows what is out there, and the money could go to proven issues on earth.Keypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should continue to subsidize space exploration because we need to know if there is viable places besides earth that may be a resource to us in the future.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should quit subsidizing the space exploration program as it is a huge waste of money, which could be used to do a lot of good here on earth.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize it because we one day may need to find a place for new resourcesKeypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration helps us better understand the universe we live in.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is an important tool to better understand the universe we live in.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We learn more about science and our environment/ universe with space exploration. this also creates more jobs.Keypoint: Space exploration is necessary for the future survival of humanity", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is very expensive and the government should be spending the money on more important things.Keypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We have better things to spend money on than space explorationKeypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize space exploration as it is important for the world to know what else is out there.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The technology developed for space exploration has also had uses in regular life - subsidizing space exploration would also have positive trickle down effects.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a good adventure. our planet is in a future risk of extinct and we should best prepare our refuge in space explorationKeypoint: Space exploration is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is nothing that can come from space research that will help the country so why waste so much money?Keypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is incredibly costly and the burden should not be placed on taxpayers.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We need to subsidize space exploration so we can find somewhere for the human race to go when we finally get done destroying our planet.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is important. we need a solution to the population, environment, energy and natural resources problems we face on earth.Keypoint: Space exploration is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The technology we get from space exploration alone is worth the cost of itKeypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We and learn as much as we can. need to continue to explore outer spaceKeypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is an extravagance in this era of poverty and injustice, we should concentrate government money on those areas instead.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should continue to subsidize space exploration because we need to know if there is viable places besides earth that may be a resource to us in the future.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Obligatory of all governments in the world must be subsidizing space exploration because we will learn how to defend our own planet.Keypoint: Space exploration is necessary for the future survival of humanity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mankind has so much more to learn about physics and the nature of things through space exploration that it must be subsidized.Keypoint: Space exploration is necessary for the future survival of humanity", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize space exploration because earth is quickly becoming uninhabitable and drained of resources. our survival depends on finding somewhere else to go.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is necessary to expand the frontiers of the human race, possibly even laying the groundwork for future colonization.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration need only be done by the private sector.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize space exploration as it is important to learn more about the universe and investigate the possibility of other life forms.Keypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is vital to the future of humanity, when we destroy this planet, we will need to have an alternativeKeypoint: Space exploration is necessary for the future survival of humanity", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration should be subsidized because the information learned from it could provide useful to our planet.Keypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration can tell us so much about the world that we live in and help us to identify potential threats that the human race may need to prepare for.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Spend that money on things that truly matter right now, that can save lives, promote sustainability of this planet and make it a better place. that needs to be prioritized before we spend a fortune out in spaceKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We shouldn't subsidize space exploration because it can be very costlyKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration advances the frontiers of mankind, and could well discover new resources that will be invaluable due to the depletion of those on earth.Keypoint: Space exploration is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration encourages inventions beneficial to our everyday lives, as well as economic stimulation.Keypoint: Space exploration is necessary for the future survival of humanity", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Humans shouldn't colonize space until we learn to care for earthKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The money spent on subsidizing space exploration could be better spent on other things that help all of societyKeypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize space exploration so we can continue to learn about our universe and any threats or benefits it offers.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize space exploration because it increases the knowledge of the universe we are inKeypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is vital to see if there are other planets that are habitableKeypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Many scientific discoveries have come from space exploration.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration has produced nothing useful, the funding would be better used elsewhereKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not not subsidize space exploration since all that money could be used to improve earth.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It can open doors for advancement and should be supported by the government.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should quit subsidizing the space exploration program as it is a huge waste of money, which could be used to do a lot of good here on earth.Keypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If space exploration was subsidised then we could learn a lot more about it and this would be beneficial for the world.Keypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is such a costly exercise that subsidising would put an enormous strain on any country's finances that can be ill afforded when there are so many more causes that need supporting on earth.Keypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a waste of taxpayers money and should be funded by private enterprises.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration costs too much money that could be spent on better thing such as helping the poor in society.Keypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It's luxury spending, maybe better to invest the money in healthcare or education.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is nothing that can come from space research that will help the country so why waste so much money?Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exporation requires vast sums of money that would be better spent closer to home on things like healthcare and schoolsKeypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Mankind has so much more to learn about physics and the nature of things through space exploration that it must be subsidized.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There are more practical needs, like housing and infrastructure, in which we should invest.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This would enable even further exploration into unknown universes and discoveries we could not have previously imagined if there were more money via subsidies to space exploration projects.Keypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Government should keep money for space exploration to find new locations to live and/or remove dangerous waste from earth.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a way to discover new worlds therefore we should put more money to explore the universeKeypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space will one day be an important resource so we need to further explore it.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is an expenditure so esoteric, it does not justify its hefty cost to the public.Keypoint: Space exploration is expensive", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is vital to continued scientific discovery.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a waste of money and it would be better spent elsewhereKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a good adventure. our planet is in a future risk of extinct and we should best prepare our refuge in space explorationKeypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration should be subsidized as it will benefit us in the future with technology advancements.Keypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidising space exploration would enable more discoveries to be made.Keypoint: Space exploration unravels information about the universe", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Subsidizing space exploration takes money away from more important issues.Keypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is horrifically expensive, and the money would be far better spent on more earth bound needs, such as medical research.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The country only has a certain amount of money, and it would be used better to help people here on earth than to explore space.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize space exploration because it is beneficial for educational purposesKeypoint: Space exploration can help in colonizing the resources/lands of other planets", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration has the potential to bring an economy worth trillions . we should do all in our power to help that become a reality.Keypoint: Space exploration is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This is too expensive and we have more pressing issues down at earthKeypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not subsidize space exploration because we should concentrate on fixing earth firstKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This is too expensive and we have more pressing issues down at earthKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Spcae exploration is very expensive and there are millions of people suffering who would benefit greatly from the money that is spent subsidizing space exploration.Keypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a waste of money that could be used to feed peopleKeypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a costly waste of money; that money could be much better spent elsewhere.Keypoint: There are issues more important to fund than space exploration", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration has a big rule to play in the progress of science and we have an obligation to support it.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is such a costly exercise that subsidising would put an enormous strain on any country's finances that can be ill afforded when there are so many more causes that need supporting on earth.Keypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If we subsidised space exploration we could learn more about our own planet from space in wys that we couldn't learn about it from here on earth.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration can tell us so much about the world that we live in and help us to identify potential threats that the human race may need to prepare for.Keypoint: Space exploration is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The money spent on space exploration would be better used to combat problems on earthKeypoint: Space exploration can be carried by the private sector", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Space exploration is a waste of time and money and we should focus on sustaining earthKeypoint: Space exploration is ineffective", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should subsidize space exploration because is important discover other resourcesKeypoint: Space exploration is financially beneficial", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Nasa and other space organizations have developed many useful technologies in the pursuit of space exploration and should be subsidized.Keypoint: Space exploration improves science/technology", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - } - ] -} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/tasks/task1307_kpa_keypoint_matching_vocational_education_topic.json b/tasks/task1307_kpa_keypoint_matching_vocational_education_topic.json deleted file mode 100644 index 5d392d349..000000000 --- a/tasks/task1307_kpa_keypoint_matching_vocational_education_topic.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2302 +0,0 @@ -{ - "Contributors": [ - "Arjun Ashok" - ], - "Source": [ - "ArgKP (https://github.com/IBM/KPA_2021_shared_task)" - ], - "Definition": "The input contains an argument and a keypoint on the topic \"The vow of celibacy should be abandoned\", separated by \"\".Your task is to answer if the keypoint matches the argument and summarizes exactly what the argument means, in the context of this topic.", - "Categories": [ - "Classification -> Verification -> Summary Verification", - "Text Comparison" - ], - "Domains": [ - "Reviews", - "Law", - "Government and Politics", - "Dialogue" - ], - "Input_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Output_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Instruction_language": [ - "English" - ], - "Positive Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: A vow of celibacy is an archaic stricture that limits the freedoms of priests and harms their relationship with the world as they are less relatable to normal people and are suppressing their natural drives.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that a vow of celibacy is an archaic stricture that limits the freedoms of priests and harms their relationship with the world as they are less relatable to normal people and are suppressing their natural drives." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should be a personal choice, no one should be denied this right, it can allow religious leaders to feel closer to their god and remove distractions from their faithKeypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that the vow of celibacy should be a personal choice, no one should be denied this right, it can allow religious leaders to feel closer to their god and remove distractions from their faith" - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The requirement of celibacy by religious leaders deters individuals from religious vocationsKeypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that the requirement of celibacy by religious leaders deters individuals from religious vocations" - } - ], - "Negative Examples": [ - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is antiquated and obsolete in today's world, therefore it should be abandoned.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that the vow of celibacy is antiquated and obsolete in today's world, therefore it should be abandoned." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abandon the vow of celibacy because it is a centuries old custom that is seen as sacred and holy.Keypoint: Religious experiences and traditions should be maintained", - "output": "False", - "explanation": "The keypoint summarizes the argument that we should not abandon the vow of celibacy because it is a centuries old custom that is seen as sacred and holy." - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is an important part of the religious experience of some and should not be taken away.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": "True", - "explanation": "The keypoint does not summarize the argument that the vow of celibacy is an important part of the religious experience of some and should not be taken away." - } - ], - "Instances": [ - { - "input": "Argument: If celibacy is abolished maybe there will be less molestation in the churchKeypoint: Celibacy leads to wrong sexual behaviour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is sacred and shows purity and should be encouraged not abandoned.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is outdated and causes many potential candidates for the priesthood to abandon or avoid their ambition of joining the church or to seek unhealthy outlets for their urges.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is outdated in today's society and no longer has any value.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is outdated in today's society and no longer has any value.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If celibacy is abolished maybe there will be less molestation in the churchKeypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy represents an outdated view on sexual behaviorKeypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People's feelings can change. it is unfair to hold someone's future self to a vow that they made not knowing who they would be in the future.Keypoint: Celibacy is unhealthy/unnatural", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Vows of celibacy are a way of expressing devotion and channelling ones thoughts away from desire into worship.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy shouldn't be abandoned because it can lower the spread of stdsKeypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of chastity should be abandoned as it goes against human needs, urges and instinct and can cause dysfunctional thinking and acts.Keypoint: Celibacy is unhealthy/unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy strengthens one's relationship to god without carnal distractions.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It shouldn't be abandoned because the people choosing that life know that they are required to be celibate and it's a decision that they make for themselves.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is a time honored tradition that allows priests to focus solely on their commitment to the churchKeypoint: Religious experiences and traditions should be maintained", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People can do what they want. if they want to stay celibate, that is their business.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy allows the priest to be completely focused on his parish community without distraction.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Too often this vow is broken and becomes difficult for someone to adhere to. it is not a necessity and goes against the law of nature.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This practice is not natural and often leads to secret crimes especially on children.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy keeps the honor and respect of the priesthoodKeypoint: Celibacy makes the priests to be perceived as holy", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy in the church is an antiquated vow and should be abandoned. it brings harm in the form of unnatural acts against easy prey to satisfy sexual urges which are normal and are being treated as if a sin.Keypoint: Celibacy leads to wrong sexual behaviour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should be abandoned, repressing human nature has led to abuse and desperationKeypoint: Celibacy leads to wrong sexual behaviour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is an unnecessary restriction that is putting too much pressure on people to maintain a lifestyle we are not biologically designed to adhere toKeypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy detracts otherwise talented individuals from entering the clergy.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is outdated and causes many potential candidates for the priesthood to abandon or avoid their ambition of joining the church or to seek unhealthy outlets for their urges.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should not be abandoned because the vow is scared and does not harm anyone that does not believe in the vow.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It should be abandoned because they have the same desires as every human hasKeypoint: Celibacy is unhealthy/unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy should not be abandoned as it a staement by the person of their personal beliefs and it is their right to express this.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy allows a man, or woman, to remain fully focused and committed to their dedication to god without outside distractionsKeypoint: Celibacy makes the priests to be perceived as holy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should not be abandoned because it allows priests and nuns to concentrate on serving their god instead of being distracted by the needs of man.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is an ancient ritual of priesthood that serves the purpose of maintaining purity and should not be abandoned.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy puts undue pressure on priests to have a lifestyle that is unnatural and has been linked to child abuse cases because of their frustration.Keypoint: Celibacy reduces the pool of people wanting to become priests", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: In this day and age there is no place for the vow of celibacyKeypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This is an outdated practice that has no bearing in todays world.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy keeps the honor and respect of the priesthoodKeypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is old-fashioned and outdated and therefore should be abandoned.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We live in a free and open society if people choose to be celibate then we should respect their choice.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is an unnatural state for humans and should be abandoned by the church and others. it leads to negative behaviors based on the attempt to suppress a normal human urge to procreate.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: All human beings have the right to satisfy our needsKeypoint: Celibacy is unhealthy/unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is an ancient law that is a cruel requirement defying a natural part of a human's life and often deters people from entering certain professions and this should be abandoned.Keypoint: Celibacy leads to wrong sexual behaviour", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy holds many virtues, offers protection from disease as well as prevents unwanted pregnancies.Keypoint: Removing celibacy could lead to sexually reckless acts", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is unnatural to be celibate & it should be abandonedKeypoint: Celibacy is unhealthy/unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Vow of celibacy is not fair to put on any human being because everyone has sexual urges which means the priests can commit evil acts of sex on minors. it should be abandoned.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is an outdated thinkingKeypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is an important cornerstone of the church, a way to show that god is above all and we need that now more than ever.Keypoint: Celibacy makes the priests to be perceived as holy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A vow of celibacy does nothing but cause issues inside religious groups, such as that of young boys and priests.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is a tradition and traditions are important to uphold.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This is a church tradition that needs to be upheld.Keypoint: Religious experiences and traditions should be maintained", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abandon the vow of celibacy, to some religious clergy it is a fundamental part of their faith and it ought to be their choice to make this commitmentKeypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex is a very important part of life, if someone is celibate this makes it very difficult to not only find someone to have a long term relationship but also to maintain a happy & healthy relationshipKeypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is an outdated idea from the early churches. many priests do not live up to the vow they take.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is very likely responsible for the thousands of sexual abuses perpetrated by catholic priestsKeypoint: Celibacy leads to wrong sexual behaviour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is an outdated thinking that is not realisticKeypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy before marriage protects young people from diseaseKeypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is a time honored tradition that allows priests to focus solely on their commitment to the churchKeypoint: Priests choose to be celibates", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should not be abandoned because it allows priests and nuns to concentrate on serving their god instead of being distracted by the needs of man.Keypoint: Removing celibacy could lead to sexually reckless acts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy must be abandoned because it is something old, the world has evolved and this is going to be understood by the faithful.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy vows are unnatural, and can cause problems.Keypoint: Celibacy is unhealthy/unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is unnatural and serves no useful purpose in regards to a persons faithKeypoint: Celibacy is unhealthy/unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The teachings of the catholic church go back centuries and celibacy is one of the fundamentals that cannot just be abandoned without harming the whole concept of catholisism.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is an important part of priesthood and being holy.Keypoint: Celibacy makes the priests to be perceived as holy", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy before marriage protects young people from diseaseKeypoint: Removing celibacy could lead to sexually reckless acts", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy puts undue pressure on priests to have a lifestyle that is unnatural and has been linked to child abuse cases because of their frustration.Keypoint: Celibacy leads to wrong sexual behaviour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is unnatural for people to be celibate and particularly those who then go on to be involved in other people's marriages and children such as priests will have absolutely no idea of the subject matter.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: I think it's unhealthy for a couple to not have sex until marriage. it can create tension and cause some people to cheat and have sex with another person.Keypoint: Celibacy reduces the pool of people wanting to become priests", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some religions, such as roman catholicism, choose to require celibacy in their fully-ordained ministers, male or female. out of respect for a person's religion, celibacy should not be prohibited.Keypoint: Celibacy makes the priests to be perceived as holy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should not be abandoned as it shows the willingness to make sacrifices on behalf of god.Keypoint: Celibacy is a strong religious belief", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is outdated and causing destructive temptation in the clergy.Keypoint: Celibacy reduces the pool of people wanting to become priests", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The marriage would be a big distraction to priests and they should devote their life and time to god and preachingKeypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is antiquated and with the diminution of overly religious beliefs, celibacy no longer needs encouragement nor promotional encouragement.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is ridiculous that anyone would not have sex because of some 2000 year old fairy tale.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is no longer relevant in today's society and should be abandonedKeypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy in the church is an antiquated vow and should be abandoned. it brings harm in the form of unnatural acts against easy prey to satisfy sexual urges which are normal and are being treated as if a sin.Keypoint: Celibacy reduces the pool of people wanting to become priests", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy goes against our basic instincts, and those who are most vulnerable could fall victim to their lapses.Keypoint: Celibacy is unhealthy/unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should not be abandoned because when a priest enters into service the church should be his highest callingKeypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People's feelings can change. it is unfair to hold someone's future self to a vow that they made not knowing who they would be in the future.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The catholic church is suffering and churches closing due to the lack of priests. many men choose to leave the priesthood because they want to marry. ending the vow of celibacy would help end this problemKeypoint: Celibacy reduces the pool of people wanting to become priests", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Vow of celibacy is no longer relevant in the modern era and should be abolished.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should be a personal choice, no one should be denied this right, it can allow religious leaders to feel closer to their god and remove distractions from their faithKeypoint: Celibacy makes the priests to be perceived as holy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy when used honestly means more focus on the flock than the priest's own family so should be kept.Keypoint: Celibacy is a strong religious belief", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is an outdated concept that unjustly prevents people from enjoying the family life that is desired by most and should be strived to attain.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy in the church is an antiquated vow and should be abandoned. it brings harm in the form of unnatural acts against easy prey to satisfy sexual urges which are normal and are being treated as if a sin.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy allows a priest to concentrate on his job and his congregation without the complications that come with having relationships and families to deal with.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should be abandoned because it is too much temptation to not have sex.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is a unique part of the catholic church and ensures a priest is not splitting themselves between their parishioners and their family, thus giving better spiritual service.Keypoint: Religious experiences and traditions should be maintained", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Remaining celibate has a long history and a major tenet of some religionsKeypoint: Religious experiences and traditions should be maintained", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We live in a time were people's sexual experience isn't important anymore, being a virgin isn't a requisite to marriage.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is unnatural for people to be celibate and particularly those who then go on to be involved in other people's marriages and children such as priests will have absolutely no idea of the subject matter.Keypoint: Celibacy is unhealthy/unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is the only 100% effective way to prevent pregnancyKeypoint: Removing celibacy could lead to sexually reckless acts", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When someone becomes a nun or priest they should wholly devote themselves to god only.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy shouldn't be abandoned because it is still important to many people and it goes hand and hand with many religionsKeypoint: Celibacy is a strong religious belief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is a fundamental pillar of catholicism and we can not abandon itKeypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is outdated and causing destructive temptation in the clergy.Keypoint: Celibacy is unhealthy/unnatural", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is an outdated ideology and did not apply until recently in religious orders.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The psychological consequences of celibacy are evident after several cases of pedophilia, i do not think the church should persist in thisKeypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is outdated, and unnecessary. the sexual drive is human nature, and there is no need to deny it.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Some religions, such as roman catholicism, choose to require celibacy in their fully-ordained ministers, male or female. out of respect for a person's religion, celibacy should not be prohibited.Keypoint: Celibacy is a strong religious belief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is a vow that has been a long held tradition in the church and shouldn't be changedKeypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy ensure 100% commitment of a person entering the profession so the celibacy vow should not be abandoned.Keypoint: Celibacy is a strong religious belief", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is an outdated concept that unjustly prevents people from enjoying the family life that is desired by most and should be strived to attain.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should be abandoned as it is now outdated and is often based on religion which people do not follow today.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is no longer considered an important qualityKeypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A vow of celibacy is an archaic stricture that limits the freedoms of priests and harms their relationship with the world as they are less relatable to normal people and are suppressing their natural drives.Keypoint: Celibacy is unhealthy/unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should not be abandoned as religious people have lived this way for a long time and their traditions should be respected.Keypoint: Religious experiences and traditions should be maintained", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A vow of celibacy is an archaic stricture that limits the freedoms of priests and harms their relationship with the world as they are less relatable to normal people and are suppressing their natural drives.Keypoint: Celibacy leads to wrong sexual behaviour", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy allows a priest to concentrate solely on god and hi parish without distractions. it means a priest has more time and energy for both his people and his god.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Churches that promote celibacy do so for reasons of their faith and we have no right to say they should abandon those beliefs.Keypoint: Celibacy is a strong religious belief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy allows priests and nuns to concentrate on helping others and helps them in their walk with their god.Keypoint: Celibacy is a strong religious belief", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy ensure 100% commitment of a person entering the profession so the celibacy vow should not be abandoned.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This vow is a sacred thing and means the person has chosen to concentrate wholly on god not their own wants.Keypoint: Removing celibacy could lead to sexually reckless acts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should not be abandoned because the vow is scared and does not harm anyone that does not believe in the vow.Keypoint: Celibacy is a strong religious belief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy keeps individuals focused on important issues and not on their own personal lifeKeypoint: Celibacy is a strong religious belief", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: With the sexual revolution, the vow of celibacy is outdated and has little value in today's society.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is one of the most important tenets of the catholic faith and should not be abandonedKeypoint: Celibacy is a strong religious belief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should not be abandoned because it allows priests and nuns to concentrate on serving their god instead of being distracted by the needs of man.Keypoint: Priests choose to be celibates", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy, and those who choose to make that vow, should be respected. it should be a matter of individual choice for the individual.Keypoint: Priests choose to be celibates", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is an outdated tradition that deters otherwise eligible men from priesthoodKeypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should be abandoned because it is unhealthy for anyone to repress feelings of desire and often leads to ghastly scandals in churches taking advantage of little children.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is an outdated concept that causes unnecessary stress on those who take them.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: More men and women would be willing to become priests or pastors.Keypoint: Celibacy reduces the pool of people wanting to become priests", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A priest chooses to make a vow to god to be celibate. he is not forced. if he chooses to become a priest he makes this vow. we should not try to take this away from becoming a priest.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is a unique part of the catholic church and ensures a priest is not splitting themselves between their parishioners and their family, thus giving better spiritual service.Keypoint: Celibacy is a strong religious belief", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is an ancient ritual of priesthood that serves the purpose of maintaining purity and should not be abandoned.Keypoint: Religious experiences and traditions should be maintained", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should be abandoned because it today's world it mostly goes ignoredKeypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is unnatural to be celibate & it should be abandonedKeypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: In this day and age there is no place for the vow of celibacyKeypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This practice is not natural and often leads to secret crimes especially on children.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A priest chooses to make a vow to god to be celibate. he is not forced. if he chooses to become a priest he makes this vow. we should not try to take this away from becoming a priest.Keypoint: Priests choose to be celibates", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should not be abandoned because people have the right to not enter into a marital or sexual relationship.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Normal men and women need the ability to respond to their sexual needs.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy has a positive side as it promotes self awareness and avoids pregnancy or sexually transmitted diseases. within holy orders it allows for greater dedication to god's work.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This vow is a sacred thing and means the person has chosen to concentrate wholly on god not their own wants.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should be abandoned because it is not natural.Keypoint: Celibacy is unhealthy/unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is responsible for the child abuse cover up by the catholic churchKeypoint: Celibacy leads to wrong sexual behaviour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is a state of purity the church should maintain as a devotion to god. it demonstrates a priests sacrifice and commitment to religious principals and allows people to place faith in their leaders .Keypoint: Removing celibacy could lead to sexually reckless acts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Vow of celibacy is important for some religious members and should be allowed to remain.Keypoint: Celibacy is a strong religious belief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy shouldn't be abandoned because it is still important to many people and it goes hand and hand with many religionsKeypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: In a religious sense, the outdated vows of celibacy should be lifted. priests should be allowed to marry and have sex like everyone else.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is antiquated and with the diminution of overly religious beliefs, celibacy no longer needs encouragement nor promotional encouragement.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It needs to be brought up to the current time and be abandoned, they have the same desires as everyone elseKeypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is no longer relevant in today's society and should be abandonedKeypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy represents an outdated view on sexual behaviorKeypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is outdated, times have changed. it also begs to question whether the vow of celibacy is contributing to the frequent assaults plaguing the catholic church.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex is a very important part of life, if someone is celibate this makes it very difficult to not only find someone to have a long term relationship but also to maintain a happy & healthy relationshipKeypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy shouldn't be abandoned - people should be allowed to do whatever they want to do,Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is antiquated and obsolete in today's world, therefore it should be abandoned.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should be abandoned because it represents a major barrier to men considering entering the priesthoodKeypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: In this age it is not expected anymore for anyone to be celibateKeypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is outdated and as we live in modern world, should be banned as once.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should not be abandoned as it shows the willingness to make sacrifices on behalf of god.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Vow of celibacy is no longer relevant in the modern era and should be abolished.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy shouldn't be abandoned as everyone has a choice if they want to indulge in such activitiesKeypoint: Priests choose to be celibates", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Religious institutions should not change their precepts only to fit in the with the prevailing ideas. if their policies are based on the truth of their beliefs then they should not change their positionsKeypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is an outdated idea from the early churches. many priests do not live up to the vow they take.Keypoint: Celibacy is unhealthy/unnatural", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy allows priests to remain 100% focused on their congregation and to not be distracted by partners or children or other family mattersKeypoint: Celibacy is a strong religious belief", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should be abandoned, repressing human nature has led to abuse and desperationKeypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is too hard to follow. people have needs.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This vow is a sacred thing and means the person has chosen to concentrate wholly on god not their own wants.Keypoint: Celibacy makes the priests to be perceived as holy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy allows a priest to concentrate on his job and his congregation without the complications that come with having relationships and families to deal with.Keypoint: Celibacy is a strong religious belief", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should not be abandoned as religious people have lived this way for a long time and their traditions should be respected.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy shouldn't be abandoned because it is sacred to become a priests and it follows the way of the bibleKeypoint: Celibacy makes the priests to be perceived as holy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: No need to abandon the vow of celibacy because it tests the faith and devotion of the priest to god. those that are truly good and spiritual don't need have sexual relations when in a relationship with god.Keypoint: Celibacy makes the priests to be perceived as holy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex is unimportant for a growing number in society - the vow of celibacy formalises this, and enables the mind and body to focus more clearly and without emotional distraction.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We are all open to temptation even those who have vowed celibacy. denial can lead to depression, anxiety and increasingly the chance of inappropriate actions to secretly meet desires.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If the vow of celibacy is not abandoned, the number of men joining the priesthood will continue to decline.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is too restrictive and hard to maintain. plus it's not actually mandated in the scriptures. therefore let's do away with it and let them be happy.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human sexual desires are god given and their is nothing to gain by repressing themKeypoint: Celibacy is unhealthy/unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy puts undue pressure on priests and leads to secret homosexuality and pedophilia and should be stopped.Keypoint: Celibacy leads to wrong sexual behaviour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abandon the vow of celibacy because it is a centuries old custom that is seen as sacred and holy.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is outdated and as we live in modern world, should be banned as once.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is outdated in today's society and so it should be abandoned.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Religious institutions should not change their precepts only to fit in the with the prevailing ideas. if their policies are based on the truth of their beliefs then they should not change their positionsKeypoint: Religious experiences and traditions should be maintained", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy puts undue pressure on priests to have a lifestyle that is unnatural and has been linked to child abuse cases because of their frustration.Keypoint: Celibacy is unhealthy/unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy allows a priest to concentrate solely on god and hi parish without distractions. it means a priest has more time and energy for both his people and his god.Keypoint: Celibacy is a strong religious belief", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A vow of celibacy is so outdated it has no place in modern societyKeypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy symbolizes a priest or nun's commitment to their calling, and is an important show of faith.Keypoint: Removing celibacy could lead to sexually reckless acts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is a time honored tradition that allows priests to focus solely on their commitment to the churchKeypoint: Removing celibacy could lead to sexually reckless acts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should be abandoned because it is too much temptation to not have sex.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Vows of celibacy are a way of expressing devotion and channelling ones thoughts away from desire into worship.Keypoint: Celibacy is a strong religious belief", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should be abandoned because it is outdated and usually causes more harm than good because the celibate person looks for release in the wrong places.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People that take the vow of celibacy do so willingly and the option to take the vow should remainKeypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is an important part of priesthood and being holy.Keypoint: Removing celibacy could lead to sexually reckless acts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: I think it's unhealthy for a couple to not have sex until marriage. it can create tension and cause some people to cheat and have sex with another person.Keypoint: Celibacy is unhealthy/unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This is a church tradition that needs to be upheld.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Sex is unimportant for a growing number in society - the vow of celibacy formalises this, and enables the mind and body to focus more clearly and without emotional distraction.Keypoint: Celibacy is a strong religious belief", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A vow of celibacy is so outdated it has no place in modern societyKeypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: For most people, celibacy goes against human nature. the scandals of the catholic church relating to the sexual predators who have taken this vow as well as the vow of priesthood is a good example.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should be abandoned as no one should be forced to live that way as it is unnatural.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We are all open to temptation even those who have vowed celibacy. denial can lead to depression, anxiety and increasingly the chance of inappropriate actions to secretly meet desires.Keypoint: Celibacy leads to wrong sexual behaviour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It shouldn't be abandoned because the people choosing that life know that they are required to be celibate and it's a decision that they make for themselves.Keypoint: Priests choose to be celibates", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy shouldn't be abandoned because it is sacred to become a priests and it follows the way of the bibleKeypoint: Celibacy is a strong religious belief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Priests are human as well and have needs which can lower the rate of sexual abuse in the churchKeypoint: Celibacy leads to wrong sexual behaviour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is an ancient ritual of priesthood that serves the purpose of maintaining purity and should not be abandoned.Keypoint: Priests choose to be celibates", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Traditionally some religions feel like the practice of celibacy ensures their members are purer.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should not be abandoned because people have the right to not enter into a marital or sexual relationship.Keypoint: Priests choose to be celibates", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is a personal choice and should be left to the individualKeypoint: Priests choose to be celibates", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy must be kept in order for the church to remain faithful to tradition. otherwise it is no longer the same religion.Keypoint: Religious experiences and traditions should be maintained", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is one of the most important tenets of the catholic faith and should not be abandonedKeypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We should not abandon the vow of celibacy, to some religious clergy it is a fundamental part of their faith and it ought to be their choice to make this commitmentKeypoint: Celibacy is a strong religious belief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is an ancient ritual of priesthood that serves the purpose of maintaining purity and should not be abandoned.Keypoint: Celibacy makes the priests to be perceived as holy", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Members of the church should not be expected to uphold an ancient vow such as that of celibacy. sex happens all the time.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should be abandoned because not everyone can hold up to the lifelong commintmentKeypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This is an outdated practice that has no bearing in todays world.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The marriage would be a big distraction to priests and they should devote their life and time to god and preachingKeypoint: Celibacy is a strong religious belief", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is outdated, and unnecessary. the sexual drive is human nature, and there is no need to deny it.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This practice is not natural and often leads to secret crimes especially on children.Keypoint: Celibacy reduces the pool of people wanting to become priests", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The psychological consequences of celibacy are evident after several cases of pedophilia, i do not think the church should persist in thisKeypoint: Celibacy leads to wrong sexual behaviour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is an unnecessary restriction that is putting too much pressure on people to maintain a lifestyle we are not biologically designed to adhere toKeypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It needs to be brought up to the current time and be abandoned, they have the same desires as everyone elseKeypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is outdated in today's society and so it should be abandoned.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy should not be abandoned as it a staement by the person of their personal beliefs and it is their right to express this.Keypoint: Celibacy is a strong religious belief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: To move with the modern times the vow of celibacy should be abandoned.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy vows are unnatural, and can cause problems.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This is an established tenet of certain churches. abandoning it would infringe on their freedom of religionKeypoint: Celibacy makes the priests to be perceived as holy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is unnatural and causes harm.Keypoint: Celibacy is unhealthy/unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The catholic church is suffering and churches closing due to the lack of priests. many men choose to leave the priesthood because they want to marry. ending the vow of celibacy would help end this problemKeypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: To move with the modern times the vow of celibacy should be abandoned.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is a centuries old tenet that is no longer viable and should be abandonedKeypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is an important part of the religious experience of some and should not be taken away.Keypoint: Celibacy is a strong religious belief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should not be abandoned because it is part of some religionsKeypoint: Religious experiences and traditions should be maintained", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should not be abandoned because when a priest enters into service the church should be his highest callingKeypoint: Celibacy makes the priests to be perceived as holy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy allows priests to remain 100% focused on their congregation and to not be distracted by partners or children or other family mattersKeypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should not be abandoned because it is part of some religionsKeypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is outdated and causing destructive temptation in the clergy.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This is an established tenet of certain churches. abandoning it would infringe on their freedom of religionKeypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should be abandoned because it is unhealthy for anyone to repress feelings of desire and often leads to ghastly scandals in churches taking advantage of little children.Keypoint: Celibacy is unhealthy/unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is an outdated concept. with sex just about everywhere, it is almost impossible to expect people to adhere to this vow today.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy must be abandoned because it is something old, the world has evolved and this is going to be understood by the faithful.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is an outdated ideology and did not apply until recently in religious orders.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Normal men and women need the ability to respond to their sexual needs.Keypoint: Celibacy is unhealthy/unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is a requirement for christianity and each religion has its rules and must be respectedKeypoint: Celibacy is a strong religious belief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We live in a time were people's sexual experience isn't important anymore, being a virgin isn't a requisite to marriage.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy shouldn't be abandoned their are some people who still believe in following this commitment.Keypoint: Celibacy is a strong religious belief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy allows a man, or woman, to remain fully focused and committed to their dedication to god without outside distractionsKeypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is outdated and irrelevant to current times. sex is no longer considered a shameful, unnatural act.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is not necessary in this day and age as it is more widely accepted.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Members of the church should not be expected to uphold an ancient vow such as that of celibacy. sex happens all the time.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is an unnatural state for humans and should be abandoned by the church and others. it leads to negative behaviors based on the attempt to suppress a normal human urge to procreate.Keypoint: Celibacy is unhealthy/unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is a unique part of the catholic church and ensures a priest is not splitting themselves between their parishioners and their family, thus giving better spiritual service.Keypoint: Celibacy makes the priests to be perceived as holy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy allows priests and nuns to concentrate on helping others and helps them in their walk with their god.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should be abandoned as it is old school and we need to get updated as a society.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is a unique part of the catholic church and ensures a priest is not splitting themselves between their parishioners and their family, thus giving better spiritual service.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The catholic church is suffering and churches closing due to the lack of priests. many men choose to leave the priesthood because they want to marry. ending the vow of celibacy would help end this problemKeypoint: Celibacy leads to wrong sexual behaviour", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is an ancient law that is a cruel requirement defying a natural part of a human's life and often deters people from entering certain professions and this should be abandoned.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should be abandoned because it does more harm than good in that many people who practice celibacy, such as priests, often crack and seek release in harmful ways.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy imposes unnatural restrictions on an individual - sexual appetite is normal, and shutting this off leads to emotional problems, isolation and guilt.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy puts undue pressure on priests and leads to secret homosexuality and pedophilia and should be stopped.Keypoint: Celibacy reduces the pool of people wanting to become priests", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: For most people, celibacy goes against human nature. the scandals of the catholic church relating to the sexual predators who have taken this vow as well as the vow of priesthood is a good example.Keypoint: Celibacy leads to wrong sexual behaviour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is a fundamental pillar of catholicism and we can not abandon itKeypoint: Religious experiences and traditions should be maintained", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy has a positive side as it promotes self awareness and avoids pregnancy or sexually transmitted diseases. within holy orders it allows for greater dedication to god's work.Keypoint: Celibacy is a strong religious belief", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should be abandoned because not everyone can hold up to the lifelong commintmentKeypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This is an established tenet of certain churches. abandoning it would infringe on their freedom of religionKeypoint: Celibacy is a strong religious belief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is unnatural and causes harm.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: All human beings have the right to satisfy our needsKeypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Human sexual desires are god given and their is nothing to gain by repressing themKeypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should be abandoned as it is now outdated and is often based on religion which people do not follow today.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is outdated and irrelevant to current times. sex is no longer considered a shameful, unnatural act.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is a serious shortage of priests and this can be remedied by abandoning the vow of celibacy.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is what drives the religious people to commit crimesKeypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of chastity should be abandoned as it goes against human needs, urges and instinct and can cause dysfunctional thinking and acts.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is a tradition and traditions are important to uphold.Keypoint: Religious experiences and traditions should be maintained", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This is an established tenet of certain churches. abandoning it would infringe on their freedom of religionKeypoint: Religious experiences and traditions should be maintained", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is a pretty strong religious belief. those who believe in celibacy should have the right to do so. having sex before marriage is a sin in their eyes and society shouldn't judge.Keypoint: Celibacy is a strong religious belief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is an outdated concept that causes unnecessary stress on those who take them.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: There is a serious shortage of priests and this can be remedied by abandoning the vow of celibacy.Keypoint: Celibacy reduces the pool of people wanting to become priests", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is not necessary in this day and age as it is more widely accepted.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Remaining celibate has a long history and a major tenet of some religionsKeypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Priests are human as well and have needs which can lower the rate of sexual abuse in the churchKeypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is unnatural and serves no useful purpose in regards to a persons faithKeypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy imposes unnatural restrictions on an individual - sexual appetite is normal, and shutting this off leads to emotional problems, isolation and guilt.Keypoint: Celibacy is unhealthy/unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A vow of celibacy is an archaic stricture that limits the freedoms of priests and harms their relationship with the world as they are less relatable to normal people and are suppressing their natural drives.Keypoint: Celibacy reduces the pool of people wanting to become priests", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A vow of celibacy is an archaic stricture that limits the freedoms of priests and harms their relationship with the world as they are less relatable to normal people and are suppressing their natural drives.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy removes sexual activity with a view to focusing on a larger purpose - it can be seen as training the mind, and allows otherwise unforeseen advances of thought and discourse.Keypoint: Celibacy makes the priests to be perceived as holy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy goes against our basic instincts, and those who are most vulnerable could fall victim to their lapses.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should be abandoned to prevent such unattainable pressures being placed upon religious leadersKeypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should be abandoned because it is unhealthy for anyone to repress feelings of desire and often leads to ghastly scandals in churches taking advantage of little children.Keypoint: Celibacy leads to wrong sexual behaviour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People that take the vow of celibacy do so willingly and the option to take the vow should remainKeypoint: Priests choose to be celibates", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We are all open to temptation even those who have vowed celibacy. denial can lead to depression, anxiety and increasingly the chance of inappropriate actions to secretly meet desires.Keypoint: Celibacy reduces the pool of people wanting to become priests", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Taking a vow of celibacy is an individual's right of choice in a free world that should be allowed and totally respected.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is no longer considered an important qualityKeypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should be abandoned because it is unhealthy for anyone to repress feelings of desire and often leads to ghastly scandals in churches taking advantage of little children.Keypoint: Celibacy reduces the pool of people wanting to become priests", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This practice is not natural and often leads to secret crimes especially on children.Keypoint: Celibacy is unhealthy/unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is very likely responsible for the thousands of sexual abuses perpetrated by catholic priestsKeypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of chastity should be abandoned as it goes against human needs, urges and instinct and can cause dysfunctional thinking and acts.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is connection to the god and any banning on it would be sin and should not be touched.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is responsible for the child abuse cover up by the catholic churchKeypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is a state of purity the church should maintain as a devotion to god. it demonstrates a priests sacrifice and commitment to religious principals and allows people to place faith in their leaders .Keypoint: Celibacy makes the priests to be perceived as holy", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Traditionally some religions feel like the practice of celibacy ensures their members are purer.Keypoint: Celibacy makes the priests to be perceived as holy", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: No need to abandon the vow of celibacy because it tests the faith and devotion of the priest to god. those that are truly good and spiritual don't need have sexual relations when in a relationship with god.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: When someone becomes a nun or priest they should wholly devote themselves to god only.Keypoint: Celibacy is a strong religious belief", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should be abandoned as it is old school and we need to get updated as a society.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of chastity should be abandoned as it goes against human needs, urges and instinct and can cause dysfunctional thinking and acts.Keypoint: Celibacy leads to wrong sexual behaviour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy symbolizes a priest or nun's commitment to their calling, and is an important show of faith.Keypoint: Priests choose to be celibates", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Vows of celibacy are an archaic remnant of an older way of thinking and for the sake of bringing religious leaders closer to understanding the lives of normal people, should be left behindKeypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy holds many virtues, offers protection from disease as well as prevents unwanted pregnancies.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is the vow of celibacy that has been the cause of many frustrated priests that have gone on to abuse children.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy puts undue pressure on priests and leads to secret homosexuality and pedophilia and should be stopped.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The urge of physical needs may interfere with the ability to be a good religious person, celibacy allow clergymen to focus on higher thingsKeypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is ridiculous that anyone would not have sex because of some 2000 year old fairy tale.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is a state of purity the church should maintain as a devotion to god. it demonstrates a priests sacrifice and commitment to religious principals and allows people to place faith in their leaders .Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is an outdated concept. with sex just about everywhere, it is almost impossible to expect people to adhere to this vow today.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The teachings of the catholic church go back centuries and celibacy is one of the fundamentals that cannot just be abandoned without harming the whole concept of catholisism.Keypoint: Religious experiences and traditions should be maintained", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is a test of faith and an opportunity through denial to express the importance of that faith. if you make a vow its important to keep to it otherwise it becomes worthlessKeypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We live in a free and open society if people choose to be celibate then we should respect their choice.Keypoint: Priests choose to be celibates", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Pledging yourself to a celibate life as a way to honor a commitment to god is one of the most amazing sacrifices a person can make. it shows true devotion to god and should be commended.Keypoint: Celibacy makes the priests to be perceived as holy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is an outdated thinking that is not realisticKeypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The requirement of celibacy by religious leaders deters individuals from religious vocationsKeypoint: Celibacy reduces the pool of people wanting to become priests", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: More men and women would be willing to become priests or pastors.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is a centuries old tenet that is no longer viable and should be abandonedKeypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Too often this vow is broken and becomes difficult for someone to adhere to. it is not a necessity and goes against the law of nature.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is an important part of priesthood and being holy.Keypoint: Priests choose to be celibates", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is a time honored tradition that allows priests to focus solely on their commitment to the churchKeypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should be abandoned because it represents a major barrier to men considering entering the priesthoodKeypoint: Celibacy reduces the pool of people wanting to become priests", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy removes sexual activity with a view to focusing on a larger purpose - it can be seen as training the mind, and allows otherwise unforeseen advances of thought and discourse.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should be abandoned to prevent such unattainable pressures being placed upon religious leadersKeypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is a personal choice and should be left to the individualKeypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Pledging yourself to a celibate life as a way to honor a commitment to god is one of the most amazing sacrifices a person can make. it shows true devotion to god and should be commended.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is an important cornerstone of the church, a way to show that god is above all and we need that now more than ever.Keypoint: Celibacy is a strong religious belief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy shouldn't be abandoned because it can lower the spread of stdsKeypoint: Removing celibacy could lead to sexually reckless acts", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is a requirement for christianity and each religion has its rules and must be respectedKeypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy puts undue pressure on priests to have a lifestyle that is unnatural and has been linked to child abuse cases because of their frustration.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy strengthens one's relationship to god without carnal distractions.Keypoint: Celibacy is a strong religious belief", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Churches that promote celibacy do so for reasons of their faith and we have no right to say they should abandon those beliefs.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: If the vow of celibacy is not abandoned, the number of men joining the priesthood will continue to decline.Keypoint: Celibacy reduces the pool of people wanting to become priests", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: We are all open to temptation even those who have vowed celibacy. denial can lead to depression, anxiety and increasingly the chance of inappropriate actions to secretly meet desires.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy must be kept in order for the church to remain faithful to tradition. otherwise it is no longer the same religion.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is an outdated tradition that deters otherwise eligible men from priesthoodKeypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: I think it's unhealthy for a couple to not have sex until marriage. it can create tension and cause some people to cheat and have sex with another person.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy in the church is an antiquated vow and should be abandoned. it brings harm in the form of unnatural acts against easy prey to satisfy sexual urges which are normal and are being treated as if a sin.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Vows of celibacy are an archaic remnant of an older way of thinking and for the sake of bringing religious leaders closer to understanding the lives of normal people, should be left behindKeypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is an outdated concept that imposes impossible standards and restrictions, fostering harmful feeling of guilt and failure amongst those in religious walks of life.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: This practice is not natural and often leads to secret crimes especially on children.Keypoint: Celibacy leads to wrong sexual behaviour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is old-fashioned and outdated and therefore should be abandoned.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is what drives the religious people to commit crimesKeypoint: Celibacy leads to wrong sexual behaviour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: In a religious sense, the outdated vows of celibacy should be lifted. priests should be allowed to marry and have sex like everyone else.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy detracts otherwise talented individuals from entering the clergy.Keypoint: Celibacy reduces the pool of people wanting to become priests", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is an ancient ritual of priesthood that serves the purpose of maintaining purity and should not be abandoned.Keypoint: Removing celibacy could lead to sexually reckless acts", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is too restrictive and hard to maintain. plus it's not actually mandated in the scriptures. therefore let's do away with it and let them be happy.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is outdated, times have changed. it also begs to question whether the vow of celibacy is contributing to the frequent assaults plaguing the catholic church.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is connection to the god and any banning on it would be sin and should not be touched.Keypoint: Celibacy makes the priests to be perceived as holy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy shouldn't be abandoned as everyone has a choice if they want to indulge in such activitiesKeypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy shouldn't be abandoned - people should be allowed to do whatever they want to do,Keypoint: Priests choose to be celibates", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should be abandoned because it does more harm than good in that many people who practice celibacy, such as priests, often crack and seek release in harmful ways.Keypoint: Celibacy leads to wrong sexual behaviour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should be abandoned because it is outdated and usually causes more harm than good because the celibate person looks for release in the wrong places.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy shouldn't be abandoned their are some people who still believe in following this commitment.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy symbolizes a priest or nun's commitment to their calling, and is an important show of faith.Keypoint: Celibacy is a strong religious belief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should be abandoned as no one should be forced to live that way as it is unnatural.Keypoint: Celibacy is unhealthy/unnatural", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: A vow of celibacy does nothing but cause issues inside religious groups, such as that of young boys and priests.Keypoint: Celibacy leads to wrong sexual behaviour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is too hard to follow. people have needs.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is the vow of celibacy that has been the cause of many frustrated priests that have gone on to abuse children.Keypoint: Celibacy leads to wrong sexual behaviour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should be abandoned because it today's world it mostly goes ignoredKeypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy keeps individuals focused on important issues and not on their own personal lifeKeypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of chastity should be abandoned as it goes against human needs, urges and instinct and can cause dysfunctional thinking and acts.Keypoint: Celibacy reduces the pool of people wanting to become priests", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy, and those who choose to make that vow, should be respected. it should be a matter of individual choice for the individual.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Vow of celibacy is not fair to put on any human being because everyone has sexual urges which means the priests can commit evil acts of sex on minors. it should be abandoned.Keypoint: Celibacy leads to wrong sexual behaviour", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should be abandoned because it is not natural.Keypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is a pretty strong religious belief. those who believe in celibacy should have the right to do so. having sex before marriage is a sin in their eyes and society shouldn't judge.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is sacred and shows purity and should be encouraged not abandoned.Keypoint: Celibacy is a strong religious belief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: People can do what they want. if they want to stay celibate, that is their business.Keypoint: Priests choose to be celibates", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: In this age it is not expected anymore for anyone to be celibateKeypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Taking a vow of celibacy is an individual's right of choice in a free world that should be allowed and totally respected.Keypoint: Priests choose to be celibates", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy when used honestly means more focus on the flock than the priest's own family so should be kept.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is a test of faith and an opportunity through denial to express the importance of that faith. if you make a vow its important to keep to it otherwise it becomes worthlessKeypoint: Celibacy is a strong religious belief", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: With the sexual revolution, the vow of celibacy is outdated and has little value in today's society.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is an outdated concept that imposes impossible standards and restrictions, fostering harmful feeling of guilt and failure amongst those in religious walks of life.Keypoint: Celibacy is unhealthy/unnatural", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is the only 100% effective way to prevent pregnancyKeypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy is an outdated thinkingKeypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy is a state of purity the church should maintain as a devotion to god. it demonstrates a priests sacrifice and commitment to religious principals and allows people to place faith in their leaders .Keypoint: Priests choose to be celibates", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Celibacy allows the priest to be completely focused on his parish community without distraction.Keypoint: Celibacy makes the priests to be perceived as holy", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: Vow of celibacy is important for some religious members and should be allowed to remain.Keypoint: Celibacy allows a priest to focus on god", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The vow of celibacy should be abandoned because it is unhealthy for anyone to repress feelings of desire and often leads to ghastly scandals in churches taking advantage of little children.Keypoint: Celibacy is too pressuring/diffcult", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It should be abandoned because they have the same desires as every human hasKeypoint: Celibacy is outdated", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: It is a vow that has been a long held tradition in the church and shouldn't be changedKeypoint: Religious experiences and traditions should be maintained", - "output": [ - "True" - ] - }, - { - "input": "Argument: The urge of physical needs may interfere with the ability to be a good religious person, celibacy allow clergymen to focus on higher thingsKeypoint: Celibacy is a strong religious belief", - "output": [ - "False" - ] - } - ] -} \ No newline at end of file