Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

end2end: add tests for workflow scripts with just dryrun enabled #28

Open
fnrizzi opened this issue Sep 9, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

end2end: add tests for workflow scripts with just dryrun enabled #28

fnrizzi opened this issue Sep 9, 2022 · 0 comments
Assignees
@marcinwrobel1986

Comments

@fnrizzi
Copy link
Member

fnrizzi commented Sep 9, 2022 •
edited
Loading

BEFORE this, we need to complete #27

ensure the workflow scripts execute the correct steps and product the correct dir structure.
To do this, for each driver script, we want to test various workflows by setting up combinations of workflow yaml files.
We can start from the yaml files arelady in the end-to-end-roms subdirs but need to test various combinations that exercise the workflow drivers properly.
marcinwrobel1986 pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 29, 2022
#28: - added tests with dryrun for end2end
dd0bf16 
- added tests activation to CMakeLists.txt
@marcinwrobel1986 marcinwrobel1986 mentioned this issue Sep 29, 2022
Merged
marcinwrobel1986 pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 30, 2022
#28: - separate the tests
7f94e1b 
- put tests in separated directories
- saved tutorials_build.py in scripts
fnrizzi added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 30, 2022
@fnrizzi
Merge pull request #43 from Pressio/28-end2end-add-tests-for-workflow…
24167d7 
…-scripts-with-just-dryrun-enabled

#28: add tests for workflow scripts with just dryrun enabled
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@marcinwrobel1986 marcinwrobel1986

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@fnrizzi @marcinwrobel1986