Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Arkane: enthalpy of formation vs. integrated enthalpy #2745

Open
hram27 opened this issue Dec 14, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Arkane: enthalpy of formation vs. integrated enthalpy #2745

hram27 opened this issue Dec 14, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@hram27
Copy link

hram27 commented Dec 14, 2024

Hello,

In Arkane, when fitting thermochemistry, one declares species() with E0, which is enthalpy of formation at 0 K inclusive of zero-point energy. This is shown as I have done so in the image below, as an example.

image

The enthalpy of formation at 298 K is given in the output.py file after running thermo(species, 'NASA').

image

However, this does not seem to be the enthalpy of formation at 298 K. Rather, this appears to be the enthalpy of formation at 0 K, summed with the integral of the heat capacity between 0 and 298 K. The value should be relative to the standard references. If only integrated, the temperature dependence would be purely an increasing enthalpy with increasing temperature, but the enthalpy of formation has usually more complex temperature dependence.

Is this an error in the distributed Arkane code, an error in my local installation, or an error in my input or running of the program?

Thanks,
Hrishikesh Ram
Westmoreland Group, Dept. of Chemical Engineering, NC State University

@JacksonBurns
Copy link
Contributor

@rwest can you check this out?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants