Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create scout view page #31

Open
andrewda opened this issue Jan 25, 2019 · 7 comments
Open

Create scout view page #31

andrewda opened this issue Jan 25, 2019 · 7 comments

Comments

@andrewda
Copy link
Member

It'd be nice to be able to click on individual scouts for a team and see how they performed that match (maybe also links to other scouts for other teams in the same match?) This would allow you to easily see if a low/high statistic was because of some obvious strategy (e.g. Team 1 is typically really good at the scale, but they had Team 2 on their alliance who is even better, so Team 1 primarily focused on the switch and lowered their scale average).

@gnawinganimal
Copy link
Member

Excellent idea! How does a team specific table sound? I basically have all the code written for this already. (Instead of fixing the team number we could fix the scout name and the timestamp if alex gets on that) anyway, this would allow you to associate data from the same scouts with eachother

@gnawinganimal
Copy link
Member

gnawinganimal commented Jan 25, 2019

Lol I should have read your description better, yeah I see what you are saying now. How about MATCH specific tables?

@andrewda
Copy link
Member Author

Yeah, that sounds even better, actually!

@gnawinganimal
Copy link
Member

Or both 😂

@gnawinganimal
Copy link
Member

The scout view page could be useful as well, for instance if we wanted to look for any obviously invalid scouts and edit the data manually (seems kinda sketch, but idk could come in handy), so lets keep the issue open. I'll make a new one for team specific and match specific tables

@andrewda
Copy link
Member Author

I'm assuming a team-specific page would fall under #21?

@gnawinganimal
Copy link
Member

Well, slightly different idea, but now that you mention it yeah it is kind of the same...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants