You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There seems to only be a rule for using \overline{} when displaying recurring/repeating decimals. If you use the \dot{} representation the generated text is very literal in comparison.
I suppose this is more of a feature request. Is there any chance of getting the same result for \dot{} as we do for \overline{} or is there a different latex command recommended for the dot notation?
Examples:
LaTeX: 2.\overline{34} Spoken text:the repeating decimal 2 point followed by repeating digits 3 4 MathML:
Thanks for the request.
I had a more elaborate heuristic for interpretation for multiple overaccents, ellipses etc. But at the time it broke too many things so I did not continue that line of work. I might be worth revisiting.
There seems to only be a rule for using
\overline{}
when displaying recurring/repeating decimals. If you use the\dot{}
representation the generated text is very literal in comparison.I suppose this is more of a feature request. Is there any chance of getting the same result for
\dot{}
as we do for\overline{}
or is there a different latex command recommended for the dot notation?Examples:
LaTeX:
2.\overline{34}
Spoken text:
the repeating decimal 2 point followed by repeating digits 3 4
MathML:
LaTeX:
2.\dot{3}\dot{4}
Spoken text:
2 period 3 dot above 4 dot above
MathML:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: