You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was studying your paper and I noticed that there are some typos in the simple interest vs compound interest example in the graphic on the readme and in figure 1 in your paper on arxiv: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2211.12588. The answer that you are claiming is correct is actually incorrect. I performed the calculation using three different solving techniques and each time came up with a rate of about 12.646198272705078%.
Here is a sample program (actually produced by github copilot using your exact prompt) that finds the correct answer:
def find_interest_rate(P, T, N, diff):
def f(R):
return P * (1 + R/N)**(N*T) - P - P*R*T - diff
a, b = 0, 1
while abs(b - a) >= 1e-6:
c = (a + b) / 2
if f(c) == 0:
break
elif f(a) * f(c) < 0:
b = c
else:
a = c
return c
P = 20000 # principal amount
T = 3 # time in years
N = 1 # number of times interest is compounded per year
diff = 1000 # difference between compound interest and simple interest
R = find_interest_rate(P, T, N, diff)
print(f"The interest rate is {R * 100}%")
There are also some typos in the paper related to this example in the paragraph right after the heading 2.2 Program of Thoughts. In some places the paper refers to a 2 year period and in others it refers to a 3 year period. (By the way I did check the calculation using a 2 year period and that also does not match the number that is in the graphic.)
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
I was studying your paper and I noticed that there are some typos in the simple interest vs compound interest example in the graphic on the readme and in figure 1 in your paper on arxiv: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2211.12588. The answer that you are claiming is correct is actually incorrect. I performed the calculation using three different solving techniques and each time came up with a rate of about 12.646198272705078%.
Here is a sample program (actually produced by github copilot using your exact prompt) that finds the correct answer:
There are also some typos in the paper related to this example in the paragraph right after the heading
2.2 Program of Thoughts
. In some places the paper refers to a 2 year period and in others it refers to a 3 year period. (By the way I did check the calculation using a 2 year period and that also does not match the number that is in the graphic.)Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: