You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We need to add this license to metacatalog (the license will exclusively be used for the DEM).
We can do "everything" with the DEM:
Article 4. Right of Use
The Licensor grants to the User the following non-exclusive rights of use regarding the Copernicus WorldDEM-30:
(a) reproduction;
(b) distribution;
(c) communication to the General Public;
(d) adaptation, modification and combination with other data and information.
I'm not sure if it is enough to just link the license to the DEM entry. According to the license, we also need to use the following note when we distribute the DEM:
We use Entry.citation to store the specific requirement how to cite the datasouce. The statement used on modification should be added to the Entry.abstract to inform the user, that the data source has to be cited in a specific way.
The Copernicus World-DEM-30 has a specific license, which is described here: https://docs.sentinel-hub.com/api/latest/static/files/data/dem/resources/license/License-COPDEM-30.pdf
We need to add this license to metacatalog (the license will exclusively be used for the DEM).
We can do "everything" with the DEM:
I'm not sure if it is enough to just link the license to the DEM entry. According to the license, we also need to use the following note when we distribute the DEM:
And where we use or modify the DEM (tools!), we need to use this note:
@mmaelicke do you think it is the right approach to add this specific license to metacatalog?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: