We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
作者你好,我在我的数据集上运行了你的代码,实验结果很不错。但我有一个问题,就是在cut_mix_label_adaptive函数中,为什么要用到两次cutmix?这个本质不就是将一个更小的labeled区域转移到unlabeled吗?感觉用一次cutmix就行了。有点不太理解,希望作者解答一下,感谢!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
您好。这份工作其实就一个观点,增大随机性来产生prediction disagreement。 参考这个,#18 , 这么玩也是为了增大随机性,在citys上这样做会更好。当然了,也是为了弱化labeled数据的影响,因为训练的时候已经在过采样labeled数据了。Hope it helps.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
作者你好,我在我的数据集上运行了你的代码,实验结果很不错。但我有一个问题,就是在cut_mix_label_adaptive函数中,为什么要用到两次cutmix?这个本质不就是将一个更小的labeled区域转移到unlabeled吗?感觉用一次cutmix就行了。有点不太理解,希望作者解答一下,感谢!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: