You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am currently working on some display libraries for supporting some parallel (8080) displays on some different teensy boards.
Some of them can be ordered with optional Capacitive touch controllers. I thought I would try out a version of the
touch paint sketch on a few of these devices, but the begin methods fail.
They fail as they have a different Vend ID and Chip ID. If I comment out the test, it appears to work.
Not sure which route I will take on all of these, as I do have library that we used for the RA8875 that Sumotoy did back awhile
ago, that might work as well.
Not sure if you are interested in this or not, or best approach, could have a table of valid VEND/CHIP...
Thanks
Kurt
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am currently working on some display libraries for supporting some parallel (8080) displays on some different teensy boards.
Some of them can be ordered with optional Capacitive touch controllers. I thought I would try out a version of the
touch paint sketch on a few of these devices, but the begin methods fail.
They fail as they have a different Vend ID and Chip ID. If I comment out the test, it appears to work.
First one: NT35510:
https://www.buydisplay.com/4-inch-3-97-inch-tft-lcd-display-module-480x800-optional-touch-screen-1
Second one ILI9488
https://www.buydisplay.com/lcd-3-5-inch-320x480-tft-display-module-optl-touch-screen-w-breakout-board
I have not tried out the touch RA8876 one yet:
https://www.buydisplay.com/7-inch-1024x600-ips-tft-touch-display-module-with-i2c-spi-for-arduino
Looks like it has a different controller chip and different connector pinout.
Capacitive Touch Controller FT5316
Not sure which route I will take on all of these, as I do have library that we used for the RA8875 that Sumotoy did back awhile
ago, that might work as well.
Not sure if you are interested in this or not, or best approach, could have a table of valid VEND/CHIP...
Thanks
Kurt
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: