You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The accumulo website only hosts the public API javadocs.
This is problematic as the website link does not have verbiage that describes these javadocs are only scoped to the public API classes.
Looking at javadoc.io, there is a clear difference between the package index available between the 2.1.3 versions of accumulo.
I'm not sure what the problem is that you're reporting here. Yes, the docs are a subset of all the Java code. That is intentional, and fits our general theme of trying to document what we think is useful/relevant for users to know. I don't think there is any implication that the javadocs are comprehensive.
The javadoc jars published to Maven Central, however, are comprehensive, and I believe that's what powers javadoc.io. But, what a third party chooses to publish has no bearing on what we choose to publish. I'm not sure there's anything for us to fix here.
Also, for what it's worth, the links on the downloads page refers to these as "Java API", which I think aligns nicely with the subset we're choosing to publish. So, I don't think there's anything to do for this issue.
The accumulo website only hosts the public API javadocs.
This is problematic as the website link does not have verbiage that describes these javadocs are only scoped to the public API classes.
Looking at javadoc.io, there is a clear difference between the package index available between the 2.1.3 versions of accumulo.
https://accumulo.apache.org/docs/2.x/apidocs/allpackages-index.html
https://www.javadoc.io/doc/org.apache.accumulo/accumulo-core/2.1.3/allpackages-index.html
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: