You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
description: These test the linear Bradford adaptations from CATs.js against the matrices <a href="http://www.brucelindbloom.com/index.html?Eqn_ChromAdapt.html">published by Lindbloom</a>
The trouble is that
Lindbloom uses low precision rounded-off matrices
Lindbloom uses a slightly different definition of D65 and D50, thus gets different results
Lindbloom is AFAICT the only source for the "expected" values for adaptation to and from other whitepoints
There would be value in recalculating these to a higher precision, and using those values as "expected" to test for later regressions.
There are 13 tests in the old Chromatic adaptation test suite and 2 in the new test suite
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: