.packit.yaml

---
specfile_path: contrib/packaging/bootc.spec

files_to_sync:
  - contrib/packaging/bootc.spec
  - .packit.yaml

upstream_tag_template: v{version}

upstream_package_name: bootc
downstream_package_name: bootc

srpm_build_deps:
  - cargo
  - git
  - zstd
  - libzstd-devel
  - ostree-devel
  - openssl-devel

actions:
  # The last setp here is required by Packit to return the archive name
  # https://packit.dev/docs/configuration/actions#create-archive
  create-archive:
    - bash -c "cargo install cargo-vendor-filterer"
    - bash -c "cargo xtask spec"
    - bash -c "cat target/bootc.spec"
    - bash -c "cp target/bootc* contrib/packaging/"
    - bash -c "ls -1 target/bootc*.tar.zstd | grep -v 'vendor'"
  # Do nothing with spec file. Two steps here are for debugging
  fix-spec-file:
    - bash -c "cat contrib/packaging/bootc.spec"
    - bash -c "ls -al contrib/packaging/"

jobs:
  # Only add CS10 and RHEL-9 RPM build test
  # But no e2e test on CS10 and RHEL-9
  - job: copr_build
    trigger: pull_request
    targets:
      # Primary targets are c9s, c10s and fedora:41 right now, which build
      # for all architectures
      - centos-stream-9-x86_64
      - centos-stream-9-aarch64
      - centos-stream-9-ppc64le
      - centos-stream-9-s390x
      - centos-stream-10-x86_64
      - centos-stream-10-aarch64
      - centos-stream-10-ppc64le
      - centos-stream-10-s390x
      - fedora-41-x86_64
      - fedora-41-aarch64
      - fedora-41-ppc64le
      - fedora-41-s390x
      # Sanity check on secondary targets, fewer architectures just
      # because the chance that we break e.g. ppc64le *just* on
      # rawhide is basically nil.
      - fedora-rawhide-x86_64
      - fedora-rawhide-aarch64
      - rhel-9-x86_64
      - rhel-9-aarch64

  - job: tests
    trigger: pull_request
    targets:
      - fedora-41-x86_64
      - fedora-41-aarch64
    tmt_plan: /integration
    skip_build: true
    identifier: integration-test