Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Future of standalone-json #1

Open
phprus opened this issue Mar 14, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Future of standalone-json #1

phprus opened this issue Mar 14, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@phprus
Copy link

phprus commented Mar 14, 2022

Tell me, please, is the development of standalone-json planned?
Including transferring bug fixes from boost.json, etc...

@ddevienne
Copy link

The beta of Boost 1.79 mention Standalone mode is available here, but there is no official release. And the doc still references Boost.JSON heavily, notably stating upfront C++11, but only later mentioning C++17 for standalone. The doc should be clearer, that this is a fork, and that C++17 is required. Should macros for standalone be removed then too? Also, any plans to re-namespace this standalone fork? Again, the doc mentions inline-namespace and thus co-existence with Boost.JSON being possible, but immediately discourages it hinting at the opposite. A clearer statement is needed. Large organizations inevitably end-up pulling shared-libraries from different somewhat-independent teams in the same process, so interop with Boost and Boost.JSON matter. My $0.02.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants