Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update "Do model names need to be unique?" to "Do ref-able resource names need to be unique?" #5927

Closed
1 task done
graciegoheen opened this issue Aug 13, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #5968
Closed
1 task done
Labels
content Improvements or additions to content improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear size: x-small This change will take under 3 hours to fix.

Comments

@graciegoheen
Copy link
Collaborator

Contributions

  • I have read the contribution docs, and understand what's expected of me.

Link to the page on docs.getdbt.com requiring updates

https://docs.getdbt.com/faqs/Models/unique-model-names

What part(s) of the page would you like to see updated?

Names of any ref-able resources need to be unique:

  • models
  • seeds
  • snapshots

Additional information

cc: @gshank @dbeatty10

@graciegoheen graciegoheen added content Improvements or additions to content improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear size: x-small This change will take under 3 hours to fix. labels Aug 13, 2024
mirnawong1 added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 27, 2024
this pr updates the existing faq
(https://docs.getdbt.com/faqs/Models/unique-model-names) to include ref
resource names, not ust model name.

Resolves #5927
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
content Improvements or additions to content improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear size: x-small This change will take under 3 hours to fix.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant