Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate soundness of symbolic execution against remote state #229

Open
d-xo opened this issue Mar 17, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Investigate soundness of symbolic execution against remote state #229

d-xo opened this issue Mar 17, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@d-xo
Copy link
Collaborator

d-xo commented Mar 17, 2023

Our new storage representation is a lot more flexible than our old one. It should allow us to (in principle) combine symbolic reads / writes with state fetched remotely. We do however need to be careful here, it would be pretty easy to introduce unsoundness here (and I suspect that we probably do right now).

We should test around this feature any more, and either fix any soundness issues that arise, or restrict it's operation so that all user exposed combinations are sound.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant