Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Any test or example on lidar mapping #17

Open
ZorAttC opened this issue Jun 10, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

Any test or example on lidar mapping #17

ZorAttC opened this issue Jun 10, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@ZorAttC
Copy link

ZorAttC commented Jun 10, 2024

I try to run the nvblox_ros on the dataset of VLP16 and I got bad result.I run fast-lio to get the tf,and the rosbag link is https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NGTN3aULoTMp3raF75LwMu-OUtzUx-zX/view.

When the lidar parameter is
image
I got trouble

image

When I modify the lidar parameter to be
image
I got a result like this ,it is definitely wrong.
image

another test:
image
image
some meshes come out,but they are still noisy and the ground disappear.
Since the readme has nothing to tutor me to configure the lidar and make it work,I need help sincerely.

@YinghaoJia98
Copy link

The code of lidar parameters might include some little mistakes. At least, in the line 124 of nvblox_node.cpp, it should be 'nh_private_.param("lidar_height", lidar_height_, lidar_height_);'.

@YinghaoJia98
Copy link

The code of lidar parameters might include some little mistakes. At least, in the line 124 of nvblox_node.cpp, it should be 'nh_private_.param("lidar_height", lidar_height_, lidar_height_);'.

And the parameters of your lidar who generates the PCL should be correct absolutely.

@ZorAttC
Copy link
Author

ZorAttC commented Jul 2, 2024

The code of lidar parameters might include some little mistakes. At least, in the line 124 of nvblox_node.cpp, it should be 'nh_private_.param("lidar_height", lidar_height_, lidar_height_);'.

And the parameters of your lidar who generates the PCL should be correct absolutely.

The code of lidar parameters might include some little mistakes. At least, in the line 124 of nvblox_node.cpp, it should be 'nh_private_.param("lidar_height", lidar_height_, lidar_height_);'.

And the parameters of your lidar who generates the PCL should be correct absolutely.

yeah,nvblox is strict to the sensor parameters,so I choose vdbfusion a substitute.

@ZorAttC
Copy link
Author

ZorAttC commented Jul 2, 2024

The code of lidar parameters might include some little mistakes. At least, in the line 124 of nvblox_node.cpp, it should be 'nh_private_.param("lidar_height", lidar_height_, lidar_height_);'.

The code of lidar parameters might include some little mistakes. At least, in the line 124 of nvblox_node.cpp, it should be 'nh_private_.param("lidar_height", lidar_height_, lidar_height_);'.

I noticed this,but still not working :(

@YinghaoJia98
Copy link

The code of lidar parameters might include some little mistakes. At least, in the line 124 of nvblox_node.cpp, it should be 'nh_private_.param("lidar_height", lidar_height_, lidar_height_);'.

The code of lidar parameters might include some little mistakes. At least, in the line 124 of nvblox_node.cpp, it should be 'nh_private_.param("lidar_height", lidar_height_, lidar_height_);'.

I noticed this,but still not working :(

I have test it by a VLP-16 in simulation. It appears to be functioning normally.
Screenshot from 2024-07-02 21-51-52

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants