You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Description
The question here is whether the ARF needs to contain high-level requirements regarding the UI of a Wallet Instance, and if so, which ones.
Planned publication discussion paper
3 September 2025
Link to discussion paper link will follow
Links to discussion thread(s) link will follow
Discussion close
Three weeks later.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We (Sezoo) are currently supporting Swinburne University (https://www.swinburne.edu.au/, one of the global design factory universities) in research on wallet design, looking specifically at the need for guidelines to provide consistent messaging and experience for users as wallets support higher risk/value/privacy interactions.
Swinburne have just finished the literature research and will be moving onto questionnaires with wallet designers shortly. We have a few good links into the wallet UX design community, but would be happy to have others proposed.
Our thinking is that we need guidelines at a high level to ensure that the experience is uniform enough that we know how a wallet will inform us about other parties, warn us about risks and help us make informed choices.
Imagine if car designers were allowed to play with which way round the brake and throttle go in a car. No-one wants wallet choices to suffer from as many (poor) design interpretations as cookie choices.
The guidelines need to be developed by a multidisciplinary team of digital sociologists, UX designers, technologists, lawyers, anthropologists, behavioral scientists etc. Think WCAG for mobile wallets.
Description
The question here is whether the ARF needs to contain high-level requirements regarding the UI of a Wallet Instance, and if so, which ones.
Planned publication discussion paper
3 September 2025
Link to discussion paper
link will follow
Links to discussion thread(s)
link will follow
Discussion close
Three weeks later.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: