-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Suggestion: Provide multiple virtual outputs #16
Comments
@qgazq do you have any other options? I use multiple as well, default of 2-3 to support a free community so I also realize this is likely not to happen any time soon and is a ton of work. I'm guessing I'll stick to OBS 27 as long as possible. |
Yes, there are other options it turns out. Option 1) is to stick with OBS 27 (not ideal) When I get some time I'll do an OBS28 portable install and try options 2 and 4. I'm convinced one of them will give the results I want without having to stay on OBS27, and without having to implement this ticket. |
I realize this is a large ask and would be a significant amount of effort, so I'm not really expecting this to happen, but worth a suggestion.
Instead of just controlling the built-in Virtual Cam, could this plugin be expanded to provide new virtual cams. I.e. do what https://obsproject.com/forum/resources/obs-virtualcam.949/ used to do, but has been depricated as OBS provides a virtual source, and this plugin allows it to be used as a filter.
The issue is I use multiple virtual outputs, as a default 2, but I have used up to 5 before.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: