Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can we start creating standard docs for this package? #485

Open
GeorgePearse opened this issue Feb 27, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Can we start creating standard docs for this package? #485

GeorgePearse opened this issue Feb 27, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@GeorgePearse
Copy link

GeorgePearse commented Feb 27, 2023


🚀 Feature

Separate docs website, or much more detail in readmes throughout the website.

Motivation & Examples

Tell us why the feature is useful.

  • Package in its current form is very difficult to get started with (I'm trying to deploy one of these models to a raspberry pi in some form which avoids the need to install torch etc. ideally ONNX).

Describe what the feature would look like, if it is implemented.

  • Website documenting typical workflows and benchmarks on different machines for different models

I'd be keen to work on all of this.

@GeorgePearse GeorgePearse added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 27, 2023
@GeorgePearse
Copy link
Author

Caveat - I had not found this notebook https://github.com/facebookresearch/d2go/blob/main/demo/d2go_beginner.ipynb which I believe resolves most of my frustrations.

@GeorgePearse
Copy link
Author

There also seems to be some tooling provided for knowledge distillation but no docs on how to use it?

@wat3rBro
Copy link
Contributor

wat3rBro commented Mar 1, 2023

@GeorgePearse Thanks for the interest, there might be certain experimental features in the codebase but mainly for internal use, we'll update the doc if we decide to release them.

@GeorgePearse
Copy link
Author

What's the status of distillation? If I could specify a torchscript path to an X101 from detecctron2 that would be great.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants