-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
VS2019: Extremely high memory usage with v3.4.1.21 #28
Comments
Hmm I tried opening the main GitExtensions repo on VS 16.11.3 with and without the 3.4.1 extension installed and it seemed roughly about the same memory consumption on my machine and didn't crash 🤷♂️ I'm wondering if this is related to my NuGet update changes:
I've made 3 test builds by reverting both of these changes and either one. If it wouldn't be too much trouble could you see if any of them fix the memory issue for you? |
Hmm yes that result doesn't make sense to me, wondering if I got them mixed up somehow... Have done another set: I don't think they get cached 😕 I found this article on the |
OK, last post in that tripleposting thread :) I troubleshooted it further and seems like clearing out (i.e. EDIT: |
Please let me know if I do anything to provide more information about this bug. As it stands I don't know if I can e.g. force this extension to log anything for me.
Upgrading the GitExt VS2019 extension from v3.4.0.7 (the newest build on GitHub) to v3.4.1.21 (the newst build on VS Marketplace) seems to result in an extremely high memory usage of
devenv.exe
, circa 2GB for just the IDE loaded with no code! With a bigger solution loaded,devenv.exe
easily crashes as it runs out of memory.v3.4.0.7, IDE loaded with no code:
v3.4.1.21, IDE loaded with no code:
For all I know, it wasn't "always" like this as it seems to have worked fine for me until yesterday. To my knowledge I have not changed any settings, the last thing I did in VS before I noticed things started breaking was opening a CMake project via VS. Because I am not sure how to debug this, I do not know if this action had any relevance to the issue or not.
So far I observed this on VS16.11.2 and VS16.11.3.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: