You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, there is a hardcoded limit for the maximum task call.
In my use case, I'm using it wilt some nested loops to call a task with very specifc vars per loop. Having a specific task for this is making sense for me as 1) I can use labels to see progress and 2) can implement some status checks to see if the task actually needs to be executed in full.
The initial execution is > 1000, but subsequent ones are in most cases way less when combined with the status check.
can we have some parameter/config to specify a different max number
can we have this check against eg the label, or the structure that is used for run: when changed ?
option not to increase the counter when the task is skipped depending on the status/ changed sources ?
Currently using a workaround by not calling a task on a loop, but invoking a command 'task '
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, there is a hardcoded limit for the maximum task call.
In my use case, I'm using it wilt some nested loops to call a task with very specifc vars per loop. Having a specific task for this is making sense for me as 1) I can use labels to see progress and 2) can implement some status checks to see if the task actually needs to be executed in full.
The initial execution is > 1000, but subsequent ones are in most cases way less when combined with the status check.
Currently using a workaround by not calling a task on a loop, but invoking a command 'task '
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: