You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Similar clang-tidy, it might be better to make the analyses simpler and later use the extracted features and statistics to combine interesting data to gain insights.
E.g. instead of improving ALA to find uses of algorithms in both callexpressions and function pointer, maybe it would be better to rename ALA to std-algorithms-call-exprs and write a second analysis called std-algorithms-functions-pointers.
I reckon that this would greatly aid in keeping the analyses written more simple and more clear.
Right now, one has to really study the doc to understand what ALA really does, which is hard to do and hard to maintain.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Similar clang-tidy, it might be better to make the analyses simpler and later use the extracted features and statistics to combine interesting data to gain insights.
E.g. instead of improving ALA to find uses of algorithms in both callexpressions and function pointer, maybe it would be better to rename ALA to std-algorithms-call-exprs and write a second analysis called std-algorithms-functions-pointers.
I reckon that this would greatly aid in keeping the analyses written more simple and more clear.
Right now, one has to really study the doc to understand what ALA really does, which is hard to do and hard to maintain.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: