Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8.0-20241120-5019b12 Missing Motor Numbers in Outputs tab for MR #2262

Closed
b14ckyy opened this issue Nov 23, 2024 · 5 comments
Closed

8.0-20241120-5019b12 Missing Motor Numbers in Outputs tab for MR #2262

b14ckyy opened this issue Nov 23, 2024 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@b14ckyy
Copy link
Collaborator

b14ckyy commented Nov 23, 2024

The Outputs Tab misses the numbering on the Motor Graphic to identify motor positions and test order:

image
image

@mmosca
Copy link
Collaborator

mmosca commented Nov 23, 2024

Did it have that before? I think it never did. It can be helpful though.

@b14ckyy
Copy link
Collaborator Author

b14ckyy commented Nov 23, 2024

I thought it did at some point.
Without them, identifying the motors can be hard as I need to screenshot or not down from the mixer page.

@mmosca
Copy link
Collaborator

mmosca commented Nov 23, 2024

I thought it did at some point. Without them, identifying the motors can be hard as I need to screenshot or not down from the mixer page.

The motor numbers are usually marked on the esc and the mixer is needed to understand where they are in the quad, in case someone had it mixed up by rotating the esc.

I do think it is a good idea overall, but it needs to match what the mixer thinks it is, and potentially, have the motor order wizard here as well

@b14ckyy
Copy link
Collaborator Author

b14ckyy commented Nov 23, 2024

Motor wizard is a neat feature but should get an update. Its a long time since I did with BF but I think there it twitches a motor with short pulses of 10% throttle and you click on a graphic what motor is spinning. This way the mixer is set up.

@sensei-hacker
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixed in #2263

I do think it is a good idea overall, but it needs to match what the mixer thinks it is,

It does now. It used to have a static image with the default positions from the preset.
Then it had none. Now it has them correct, matching the mixer.

Caused by #1910
The preview image from the mixer was reused on the outputs tab.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants