Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dear author, I want to know the reason for setting γ=2.2 #5

Open
UnTIo opened this issue Dec 26, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Dear author, I want to know the reason for setting γ=2.2 #5

UnTIo opened this issue Dec 26, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@UnTIo
Copy link

UnTIo commented Dec 26, 2024

Dear author, I want to know the reason for setting γ=2.2

@fuat-arslan
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for your interest in our work. The parameter γ=2.2 was selected based on careful cross-validation during the development phase. It consistently provided better results across the metrics we evaluated in our experiments with different datasets. Additionally, it aligns with the mathematical properties of g(t) as defined by Equation (6) in the paper, corresponding to its integral over the interval [0,T].

To make the approach more adaptable for other applications, we introduced the γ configuration in the code, allowing users to adjust the scaling as needed. You can adjust the gamma configuration to suit your specific use case and fine-tune the bridge here:

gamma: 1 # Gamma value that controls noise in the end-point of the bridge

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants