Is better documentation needed?

[gaurav21r]

Guys, first of all. Great job! This is a fantastic framework! 👍

As this is the port of impress.js there is one essential feature missing I think which will also contribute to jmpress.js 's development from the community.

The inline code documentation is certainly very very lacking although there is a good modular architecture. Compare it to the no so modular but beautifully documented https://github.com/bartaz/impress.js/blob/master/js/impress.js

My team and I can work on inline documentation and send Pull Requests. But I wanted to conform from @sokra @shama whether they would be open to such a thing as I don't want our efforts to goto waste.

Personally, it took me quite some time to get around the code before I could contribute. Its certainly intimidating!

[sokra]

Sure you can work on documentation. 👍 We'll comment on and merge your PRs.

[sokra]

If you have any question about code fragments, feel free to ask.

[JJ]

Totally. I do have to work a lot through examples to get something done.

[ramboldio]

👍

[FagnerMartinsBrack]

Any news on this one?

[gaurav21r]

Whoops, got busy with other projects! But definitely in my radar. Anyone else interested in contributing to this? We can share the workload.

[JJ]

Count me in if needed.