You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For example, you can be able to test not only on different couchs on the same room, but also define them on the same room so the train data apply to the bigger region too (couch1 + living, couch2 + living). It could be possible to return the different "closures" from more specific to more generic, or viceversa.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think it needs some discussion, but it's a good idea.
I guess the simplest way would be to maybe make a directory called ~/.whereami/areas, in which we have an area name (living.txt) with the names of the subregions (couch1, couch2) in it rather than sample data?
You could just as easily just do this all from a label standpoint. For example, name it living/couch1 and living/couch2 - this would automatically tell you where you are as well as where that is as well.
For example, you can be able to test not only on different couchs on the same room, but also define them on the same room so the train data apply to the bigger region too (couch1 + living, couch2 + living). It could be possible to return the different "closures" from more specific to more generic, or viceversa.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: