You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was using extract-allc to merge CG counts across strands on version 1.0.8 of allcools. I encountered the following and wanted to check if this was the expected behavior / if you had any recommendations.
The ultimate goal might be to compare, for example, methylation at that "...84" position across samples. Can't say for certain because I don't have the original alignments, but I wonder if Sample1 and Sample6 may just have happened to have coverage at position 85 but not 84.
Was hoping to check with you if (1) this is the expected output, or if I ran something incorrectly here. More generally, is it (2) more intuitive to make it so strand-merged output is always relative to the cytosine on the reference + strand? If so, not sure if it requires a major code change or a user could just normalize the files by calculating CorrectPos = Pos - 1 when Strand == "-" after extract-allc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi Hanqing:
Hope you're well!
I was using
extract-allc
to merge CG counts across strands on version 1.0.8 of allcools. I encountered the following and wanted to check if this was the expected behavior / if you had any recommendations.Example command:
Example region in the output .allc across different samples:
The ultimate goal might be to compare, for example, methylation at that "...84" position across samples. Can't say for certain because I don't have the original alignments, but I wonder if Sample1 and Sample6 may just have happened to have coverage at position 85 but not 84.
Was hoping to check with you if (1) this is the expected output, or if I ran something incorrectly here. More generally, is it (2) more intuitive to make it so strand-merged output is always relative to the cytosine on the reference + strand? If so, not sure if it requires a major code change or a user could just normalize the files by calculating CorrectPos = Pos - 1 when Strand == "-" after
extract-allc
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: