You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
When you deploy anyone of Magda's connectors, they will create certain aspects necessary for the connector to operate but if there are existing aspects within the database they will be overwritten by the connector when deployed. This proved frustrating when I would modify the project open data aspect to reference a different schema standard but would be overwritten with the default schema standard upon deployment of the connector.
Describe the solution you'd like
I would like when deploying a connector, that it preforms a check for existing aspects and does not overwrite an aspect if it already exists within the database. Adding this to the connector-sdk would be helpful for future development of connectors.
Describe alternatives you've considered
N/A
Additional context
N/A
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We can test the existence of the aspect definitions when this option is false.
As it's part of connector options, it will be configurable via the connector helm chart.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
When you deploy anyone of Magda's connectors, they will create certain aspects necessary for the connector to operate but if there are existing aspects within the database they will be overwritten by the connector when deployed. This proved frustrating when I would modify the project open data aspect to reference a different schema standard but would be overwritten with the default schema standard upon deployment of the connector.
Describe the solution you'd like
I would like when deploying a connector, that it preforms a check for existing aspects and does not overwrite an aspect if it already exists within the database. Adding this to the connector-sdk would be helpful for future development of connectors.
Describe alternatives you've considered
N/A
Additional context
N/A
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: