You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 21, 2024. It is now read-only.
The workbook explains that desired output and actual output may look very different under inspection tools because of the global phase component, but it suggests that the test harness will do the correct thing and ignore the (physically) unobservable. But then the provided solution for T1.6 does not succeed. Is there code that can make this test pass? Or is there something wrong with the test?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
The workbook explains that desired output and actual output may look very different under inspection tools because of the global phase component, but it suggests that the test harness will do the correct thing and ignore the (physically) unobservable. But then the provided solution for T1.6 does not succeed. Is there code that can make this test pass? Or is there something wrong with the test?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: