Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CORE dataset vs. Semantic Scholar #17

Open
bruffridge opened this issue Apr 16, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

CORE dataset vs. Semantic Scholar #17

bruffridge opened this issue Apr 16, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@bruffridge
Copy link
Member

bruffridge commented Apr 16, 2021

Which dataset should we work with first? Things to consider:

  1. (Most important) Which dataset contains more biomimicry articles? (Alex and Colleen)
  2. Which dataset is easier to work with? (download, extract, clean, dedup, etc.) (dinopanda)
  3. Which dataset is easier to pull down new articles that we haven't labelled yet. (dinopanda)
  4. Which has better data quality? (Shruti)
  5. Which contains the most data elements important to us? (full text url, title, abstract, fulltext, others?) (Shruti)

Semantic Scholar vs. CORE

@bruffridge
Copy link
Member Author

  1. Semantic Scholar
  2. Wash
  • dinopanda

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants