Remove all introduced in 5.x mentions from the dev branch #2022
Conversation
modules/ROOT/pages/authentication-authorization/manage-users.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
modules/ROOT/pages/authentication-authorization/ldap-integration.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
modules/ROOT/pages/authentication-authorization/manage-users.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
modules/ROOT/pages/authentication-authorization/manage-users.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
modules/ROOT/pages/authentication-authorization/manage-users.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
modules/ROOT/pages/authentication-authorization/manage-users.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| @@ -3107,11 +3107,11 @@ m|+++false+++ | |||
| |=== | |||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
| [role=label--new-5.7 label--dynamic-5.10 label--enterprise-edition] | |||
| [role=label--dynamic label--enterprise-edition] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| [role=label--dynamic label--enterprise-edition] | |
| [role=label--dynamic-5.10 label--enterprise-edition] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I am not sure about this. In 2025, it is dynamic.
modules/ROOT/pages/database-administration/composite-databases/delete-composite-databases.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
modules/ROOT/pages/procedures.adoc
Outdated
| @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ For more information, see the link:{neo4j-docs-base-uri}/cdc/{page-version}/[CDC | |||
| | *Mode* 3+| READ | |||
| |=== | |||
|
|
|||
| [role=label--new-5.17 label--beta] | |||
| [role=label--beta] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do we need this label here? The CDC feature is GA starting from 5.23.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If it is GA, no.
modules/ROOT/pages/procedures.adoc
Outdated
| @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ For more information, see the link:{neo4j-docs-base-uri}/cdc/{page-version}/[CDC | |||
| | *Mode* 3+| READ | |||
| |=== | |||
|
|
|||
| [role=label--enterprise-edition label--new-5.17 label--beta label--admin-only] | |||
| [role=label--enterprise-edition label--beta label--admin-only] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| [role=label--enterprise-edition label--beta label--admin-only] | |
| [role=label--enterprise-edition label--beta label--GA-5.23 label--admin-only] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
or to remove the beta label and not to use the GA label?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think that we should remove all mentions of 5.x, including GAs, etc. If the feature is no longer beta, we should also remove beta labels.
|
One general question: there is the PR to remove all mentions of the discover service v1. Do we need to remove labels from settings, procedures, etc. here if they will be completely removed in the aforementioned PR? |
…on.adoc Co-authored-by: NataliaIvakina <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: NataliaIvakina <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: NataliaIvakina <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: NataliaIvakina <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: NataliaIvakina <[email protected]>
…/delete-composite-databases.adoc Co-authored-by: NataliaIvakina <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: NataliaIvakina <[email protected]>
modules/ROOT/pages/procedures.adoc
Outdated
| @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ For more information, see the link:{neo4j-docs-base-uri}/cdc/{page-version}/[CDC | |||
| | *Replaced by* 3+| xref:procedures.adoc#db_cdc_query[`db.cdc.query()`] | |||
| |=== | |||
|
|
|||
| [role=label--enterprise-edition label--beta] | |||
| [role=label--enterprise-edition label--beta label--GA-5.23] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actually, I think it should be just:
[role=label--enterprise-edition]
Co-authored-by: NataliaIvakina <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: NataliaIvakina <[email protected]>
Hmm, that's a good question. There will be conflicts between those two PRs for sure. Probably, it doesn't really matter if we fix them now. |
|
This PR includes documentation updates Updated pages: |
No description provided.