You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Context
I found S1 mutations a super useful coloring in the pre-Omicron days.
Unfortunately, Omicron has so many S1 mutations now that new S1 mutations are no longer identifiable through this coloring.
Description
It would be great if we could add a few colorings to ncov that are at branch level.
This would allow more informative tree scanning/browsing by coloring at a local level - where granularity is not hidden through signal/noise issues.
Examples
While we're at it - we may want to add other things as branch colorings, like number of reversions on a branch, to quickly be able to spot bad branches.
I could imagine that there are other metrics where a branch-level delta coloring would be great.
In fact, we may even want to think about integrating a coloring "delta" mode into Auspice. Anything that gets accumulated could also be displayed in delta/diff branch mode. @jameshadfield
Possible solution
Add a script that calculates branch diffs based on cumulative information already present in the auspice.json - post processing of the auspice.json tree.
Alternatively, this could be a separate node-data.json input.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Context
I found S1 mutations a super useful coloring in the pre-Omicron days.
Unfortunately, Omicron has so many S1 mutations now that new S1 mutations are no longer identifiable through this coloring.
Description
It would be great if we could add a few colorings to ncov that are at branch level.
This would allow more informative tree scanning/browsing by coloring at a local level - where granularity is not hidden through signal/noise issues.
Examples
While we're at it - we may want to add other things as branch colorings, like number of reversions on a branch, to quickly be able to spot bad branches.
I could imagine that there are other metrics where a branch-level delta coloring would be great.
In fact, we may even want to think about integrating a coloring "delta" mode into Auspice. Anything that gets accumulated could also be displayed in delta/diff branch mode. @jameshadfield
Possible solution
Add a script that calculates branch diffs based on cumulative information already present in the auspice.json - post processing of the auspice.json tree.
Alternatively, this could be a separate node-data.json input.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: