MLO evaluation: Continous Work on the List of Used Ontologies

[HendrikBorgelt]

This issue is associated with the charter epic #2.

Which mid-level (domain-agnostic) ontology does this issue address?

As the list of used Ontologies inside the NFDI has still a lot of inconsistent expressions and could be evaluated more in-depth, we should discuss the criteria of evaluation.
see https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1UAfDKo2gKiaFldEeitMUcO8Gl1Fjyb_r_bp1V4JW0Es/edit#gid=3857951

What further steps are needed to be taken or discussed by/in our WG regarding this issue?

1. Find Curators who maintain and contact the respective Consortia if action is needed.
2. Define Possible entries for a lot of the columns so that we can compare and reuse the dataset more efficently. Morst important entries are
   • Modularity
   • Domain
   • Format (a syntax is not equivalent to Semantic Format e.g. Thesauri, Taxonomy, Ontology and thus we should divide this into syntax and Semantic format)
   • Links to Ontology and Version used