You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
OMI_link and OMI_seat currently depends (optionally?) on OMI_physics_body (and by extension, OMI_physics_shape).
I was worried about the dependency on OMI_physics_body reducing adoption of OMI_link which is otherwise a simple spec.
I want to add a note to OMI_link that it is acceptable to implement this and read the shape information from the physics properties, without necessitating a whole physics engine implementation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
OMI_link and OMI_seat currently depends (optionally?) on OMI_physics_body (and by extension, OMI_physics_shape).
I was worried about the dependency on OMI_physics_body reducing adoption of OMI_link which is otherwise a simple spec.
I want to add a note to OMI_link that it is acceptable to implement this and read the shape information from the physics properties, without necessitating a whole physics engine implementation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: