Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OMI_link should add note for implementations without physics engine #179

Open
lyuma opened this issue Jul 6, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

OMI_link should add note for implementations without physics engine #179

lyuma opened this issue Jul 6, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@lyuma
Copy link
Contributor

lyuma commented Jul 6, 2023

OMI_link and OMI_seat currently depends (optionally?) on OMI_physics_body (and by extension, OMI_physics_shape).

I was worried about the dependency on OMI_physics_body reducing adoption of OMI_link which is otherwise a simple spec.

I want to add a note to OMI_link that it is acceptable to implement this and read the shape information from the physics properties, without necessitating a whole physics engine implementation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant