You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There's a couple words floating around relating to the idea of adding a texture, label, or ID to a mesh, image, or 2D polygon. We should try to standardize the language around this for interpretability.
In my mind, texture is the broadest word. In most cases, it does refer to a scalar or integer label, so maybe label makes sense in most contexts. The one exception is colors. The word ID I think should be avoided if there's a chance we're actually talking about scalar/continuous data. But I think it's reasonable in contexts where we are explicitly processing integer class ID data.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There's a couple words floating around relating to the idea of adding a texture, label, or ID to a mesh, image, or 2D polygon. We should try to standardize the language around this for interpretability.
In my mind, texture is the broadest word. In most cases, it does refer to a scalar or integer label, so maybe
label
makes sense in most contexts. The one exception is colors. The wordID
I think should be avoided if there's a chance we're actually talking about scalar/continuous data. But I think it's reasonable in contexts where we are explicitly processing integer class ID data.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: