-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pulse sequence reconsideration (and fMRI techniques) #156
Comments
For existing instances this means the following clean up: Technique library > T1PulseSequence >>>> MRIWeighting library > T1weighting Technique library > spinEchoPulseSequence >>>> MRIPulseSequence library > spinEchoPulseSequence Additional instance list will follow shortly |
also related: #130 |
Additionally we should add / correct these pulse sequences (not finished yet with summary): spin echo pulse sequence (see comment below)
inversion recovery pulse sequence (see comment below)
gradient echo sequence (see comment below)
diffusion weighted sequence
saturation recovery sequence (TBD) echo-planar pulse sequence
spiral pulse sequence (TBD)
fast spin echo pulse sequence
|
During offline meeting with @spieschnik, @Peyman-N and @tgbugs:
|
During offline meeting with @spieschnik, @Peyman-N. @lzehl and @tgbugs:
Open question: |
Offline discussion with @tgbugs and @lzehl about the general organization of pulse sequences: Start problem is that T1 and T2 are, in the physical sense not pulse sequences (e.g., https://radiopaedia.org/articles/mri-pulse-sequences-1 does not even list it under pulse sequences, and this quote "The MR signal intensity (S) produced using a spin echo sequence is proportional to the proton density (ρH), TR, T1, TE and T2, described by the equation S ∝ ρH [1-eTR/T1]e-TE/T2 4.")
Generic pulse sequences and contrast as separate parameter or have all combinations? - @tgbugs: rather split them
contrast agents (given to specimen or quality of the specimen) vs. weighting/contrast (algorithm that produces the contrasted image, hopefully making sense but theoretically could be applied to any kind of data) vs. pulse sequences (machine settings and which coil(s) were used and such, physically available data)
examples:
contrast agent: oxygenated hemoglobin vs. deoxygenated hemoglobin
pulse sequence: radio echo sequence, etc.
MRI parameter weighting: T1, T2, T2star, proton-density, diffusion-weighted?, more?
Additionally some MRI technique should be reconsidered:
functional MRI:
fMRI as superclass for BOLD fMRI (blood oxygenation level dependent), VASO fMRI (vascular space occupancy) and ASL fMRI (arterial spin labeling)
This is related to #128 (MRI as superclass with structural MRI and functional MRI)
diffusion-weighted imaging:
is a protocol and not a single technique, should probably be sMRI + diffusion-weighted + some pulse sequence; what to do about these complex processes? should the "endpoint" be registered or not?
To Do:
To Discuss:
also related to #57
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: